50
FAO Fisheries LlEiorts, No 162 FID/L16 En) Report of the Tenth Session of the COMMI EE ON FISHERIES Rome, 310 June 1975 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS

COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

FAO Fisheries LlEiorts, No 162 FID/L16 En)

Report of the Tenth Session of the

COMMI EE ON FISHERIES

Rome, 310 June 1975

FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS

Page 2: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted
Page 3: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

REPOR')

of the

TENTH S5ION OF THE COLTTEE ON FISHERIES

Rome, 3-10 June 1975

FOOD AND A IULTURE OR Z.ATION OF

Rome, Jiy 1975

UNITED NATIONS

FAO Fisheries Re orts No. 162 FID R162 En

Page 4: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

Dist'

All IAO Ykiube' Nc,tiono dAaciooic.to Nomboro

Pioipzto in tho.00aeionOihr i orciod Jaiiono cwiIoictional Oriitions

?PO D3parïxen oT FicthorieoFiohory Officcwo in F1O Rojional Offices

ii

0F THIS REPORT

Bibliographic Entry

FAO0 Corniroo on Fishories0Romo9 3-10 tïtno 1975(1975)

1VAO Fioh0Rop0, (162):37 p0Ropoii of ho tih sooiion of the...0.

This is the fi version of the report ae approved by the Tenth See ion of the Co itteeon Fisheri s

N.. TI

Page 5: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

iii

10 Jtme 1975

I';r., c

Oooii

Dear trI hw th oom o tmj o ou 1i:eotyiki tho roport o the

PeTU LiO1 Of LL COfl1LiìOO O1 L'i1hOOL) I1 \J he1O i Romefrom 3 o 10 JuTe 1975e

Yoiri fibhfu11y

Poro FriooCiiixmioo o ior.oci

Page 6: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted
Page 7: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

Fis].d Progiwte

eui çr end e

e ro men

cu].ture

COOPERATION IN WIlTED NATIONS SYS :i IN iL iTION TO FIS

United Ntione Conference on the Liìw of the SRo].a1ione with c4hr United Natioru o

NATI S CONSIDERED r TEE (' CIL OF FAO

SU TED IttJ W IT1 e OFOF coriii .ft

rrisDATE 0E OF SESSION

V

TADLE OF CONTENTS

TRS REQUIRING ¿TENTION BI 'L'IE QCJNCIL

O?TIG OF SESSION

OF TRE A(NDà AU) FOR THE 51011

:11ATIONAL 3F1ECTZ OF FISRERT IIANA AND 1EVELO

Th, - of ihe world fihezy reeorn'oeeFieIoy ceocUy e w.tion end oufloo1Ao,vitteF 0f rr ou3. fìhery hodieiRovicu o the cthin r-v1 ompoeition o' the F).elieryConiiteo for 1th Eon 0ei'tr&. At].rmtio (CCiW)

TATION OF 1iR1L A1J) BILAFISHERY PRQIFtODLE OF TI) F

THE WORK OF FAO T THE IINLD OF FIS(REQu. ?iD ACTIVITIES)

F&ehery rov.rceoFiehery roouvoeFi& x'eow'oe

.h42y OIOW'CInc' ìng fib prothctionFish rti1izationComnoditioe e p]. inRegio i activi10Ethiot ion and training

Pages vii - viiiParagraphe i - 4

5-. 6

7 35

7 - 1213 - 18.19 - 29

30 - 35

36 - 42

43 - 45

46 - 68

53-5455

56

57

58 60

61 - 6364

65

66 -68

69 84

69 - 7475-84

85 - 88

89 .- 93

94

95 - 96

: ¿: ASISTANCE FO

nr tES DORING 1976-77

vat ion

stioni

SESSION

Page 8: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

vi

41. :ijt o' u ob3crvrl Page 16

13 - Art by tlw D?pily Di ctor-Une1 t opin iiio 26

O - Arcr by VO D0 Lyci, Diror-Geneii or the Ntioi:ein OríìcQ or toi'ocoo 29

D 35

- J4t Of doouet8 36

Page 9: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL

AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION

L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN

rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e

Th Comnittee noted tb1; omittini Porivtau enehovct the oatch o' othr cnwiuefieherion oontined to case wt about 2 nilliou tons a ysa Sinon nearly ali fish

tOcb3 were mo rately or hsatiy oploitsd, much of the fwtb.er devnlopncnt u1d haveto come from more rational and bettor wnad vstin Tie Coemittee reiterated theneed for more oplote id timoly data to permit the e4option of appropriate ngeneitmoasersr. Specific csu tiens were made for improvi th cXltton, compilation anddieeninaion of itierj and other data &d thc need fw tr,Xniug £r these subjectsw ozephasizod The Cumritee req steci FAO to centthue to uit ruinrly reviews ofthe state of parns 7-.12)

The Coraiittoo emphasized the impo1ant role o gion&. fishery bodies and, notedthat for FAO bo&tes this role was now more rsrtLy corworned, wìth the maement and.development of f hsrieu It was recommended ti it ohould review oritica]ly the over-ail performmoc of conai fishery bodies and point out short uine as appropriate0

In d o seing the uor1 o the Fishery Committee for the Eastern Contrai Atlantic(cECiF), the Cou ttee noted the ursnt need for as essin. the state of eploitation ofthe living resources in the Eastern Centrai Atlantic and recoisniandod that the CEQAF Sub-Committ@e on ianaenient uf Reeoucsu within the Limi-ts of National J'irisdiotion shouldbe convened at an ly date to review the sitwitiun aed formulate appropriate resomuien-dat tone.

As regards the consultation which the Director-Ckmerai been authorised by theCouncil to cnry ou conoez'iing the proposed tnrtablishmont o an inland fishery bodyfor the Near East, A1a and the Far Eant, the Couuet'ttee w'tnd that insufficient replieshad been received for a recoanezìdation to be made. The Committee invited the Direotor-General to report further on this matter at ito next ueueiouQ (parano 19, 21, 35, 87)

United Nations Conference on the Yjii of the Sea

The Committee comuiented on the contribution made by FAO to the wor1 of the Confer-oe which should continuo, und thoroughly LiOOLWOQd the inoreaseci responsibilities

that mi t bave to lxi awaQd by FAO and by the Couniittoc itself after the emergence ofa new loul order govex'ning the uses of the ooean It requested the Seoretariat to meiseprepexatione for a meeting of its Sub-Committee on tho Povulopuent of Cooperation WithInternational Orsnisations Conoerned. with Fisheries. The Sub-Ooimuittse, scheduled tomeet early in 1976, should in particular propeus measures designed to improve and. fur-.ther rwbionnlie existing arronouentu for fishery m' uient, and development, andconsider the roles to be played by thu vuirious f iuhery bod.i, the Committee and. -theDepartment of Fisheries of FAO, bearing in miud the need to accelerate the tz'anwfer o±tsohnoloy to developing uountrioe in the fishery sector. (parao 69-72)

(continued)

Page 10: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

Coordinat!c?o:' û iera]. id bJ.n1er'.rjtij-j o ioh'y

The On1ee xiderlined. the roi- improved co uLtatiori between doiiors recipientsand executing ageflcies to athieve th maximum efficiency in fishery development sistance,It roq-uosted FAO to oolloot naly and diseemL formation on fisheries aid2 donorcriteria end the needs of potential cipionts rfha Co ittee felt that the 'egional andinter-reg-louai Íshery pro jeote ez.øouted by FAO 1hrothout' the worH offered scope for

.aoiing a.d fron bilatcrc'l c' ai cooî. a i , aSvoorn 2t(paras. 36-42)

The work of FAO in the ±'ìeid of

tho Cow*te r'' icheries

ries d'una 197677

The Conmittee expressed general satisfaction with the pret3tìon and contents ofthe proposed Prog-enme of Work of FAO in Fisheries for 1976-77 'ith the way its roc-ommendatious regarding priorities had been net Sorne concern o,'oec1 'that theproposed. increase for the Department of Fisheries would b xai' na].l

Tho Committee noted a'oval the continuing owth i'-ie.ld. rogainne butexpressed concern ).rjt appropriato increases in the the overallProgramme for which ho Departaent was respozisiblo, might eu"

The Commit-bee strongly endorsed the concept of deoent:iabion but stressed that-this rust no-b lead to Ir eutation of FAO's fishery pro1: Ji.oh needed to be efleo-.-bivoly planned end coordinated by the Department of : uider the gidanco of theCommittee itself, (parase 46-68)

-bc'b:vly cheduled to b hold in Rome at the end ci' 8øptembsr(paras. 9, 96)

Page 11: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

OPENING OF THE SESSION

ï The Committee on B9therie held. io Tenfla eeion in Rome from 3 to 10 Jwie 1975e ftSeeion wa teic1ed by 43 meber3 of he.Committee by obaerveWv from 11 other FAO rombrntion and the US SJL by x'epreiitative of the United &tione Development Progrìmithe Intor,vernmeital Oceanorphic Cooimiioii, a:ad the European Economic Community, an9 brobservers from two other A lirrt of deletes and obecrvergiven in Aq:L to hi. e rpo:-

2 The Seion w opened by t Ohiriun l Pcre Prieto (Peru), nd the participuitwelcomed by Íoy I. Dputy ireooWCuo,l of FAO in an add.res the

oZ which ii reproduced thic copo

3 The uo3t opc?1:oi eT ;1io Socxd.ou of the J::. D0 Layahi , Director.-Geteralo" 1'e Na i O Cc o 9. o.o oí o ? roroc'co O <' dree t the nvtat iortho irectorCil of &O on tiiuc riovoLopcu ci c'ooe thOr n the last føw yor'rii: lull text o o4drooc r crn oducod. u AricUC h j

: Ifl reply to uoi;ior for c fLoor L'h :r,i1 üiat Morocco equJm''-to vin ioiiv-. j pr; c they h.d t have retito training abroad vifl thr oro :iwh training in Morocco eif11e epreeed htr: ooimtr q r;ro rappe1; :o co i1ion ithin the freiieijor1, othe Fishery OcJ;to :c o oru AtI :;o tmoí.) d outliied bilworlmeute for co oi . t10 !oc ;r Vi ud Sene3. Ior000t ).c3,chivod 14 pc cooui; co :Li. çtcow yeo but ou3y abrn

pevoout .... t.or t; o t ;oiçh iruniy;ioiu :U OOr'a&Ii PQt1 ) '

the coitry ioub,oc1. :t1 ;i- jfln 11C1.t1(,liotQQd tooxperienco 1' a1oi bo oir::cl.. rn ;c ho Uopoc hn,t the oIpcbrtcbJ r

oroccn Bupy.:.cr1 tyii? '.Thtc :o c tkrt,' -tho 1.d :'oo iqoroign ezobt

P1w Cc i;ar 1mo i1.ç A';cw\ )1I)-#; j íl U O hiE repOX1 The cioovjneniWL ch flo i » 'ho (1ç iir¿ I r .i Pywçh r vopert

6 A z't'tin ç,ì,;;çn c'íJ,n;:; Q nrJclLvon Q. Notitvxm 'r'oo cn'-. ;ir io '*;;nr:. oç Ao:o

o

( r) Thopono :'

7 The Socot,v tho ov;c thc rc:n iQ1.(i :iihcy cnavoori( .00wnot OO7X/(5/ ) t(l,iOI(t( líJ ¿C1)j,17 ïìio1 U1OP1C1 hoprerenod X .j:orl ';li; t:.0 oï.ow 1zri..L3. ioiu ;o bo pioa'tor'o of bbe el3o.voc o. LVO io:.'I,t U '.ÍALO7 Û OW.'CQU Povawn, iiihho oluoc Q WC O!.1 lií,d!,çici 3rJo.aot .,upn ir3 R:lOr.Lh nion1. j o1oiycu, ; otgL bo ueftz1 if ho iornwtionror&U m ic ici ooi :Qtod oi by li@ c).ow1 boaiCrj çouLc3 bc mtIt vja, iotod c 'epo' thci1 iid eJ' oprod ovory ;1ree or 'oiu yocrcuriin ;1io oia;o ci 1w i.Lo1io'y W uovJ.t bi ïtìocr iirefvJ. i'ur 1nnorc?,3ever1 e1otioíij vcotdo '1io Uoîoo rjhotJ.d i!zo c oriiici c1u3iO O.0 thotion of rçion1 bodice xd poir out hortcomin a approprite1,

8 The Coiuioo ioioc. thY ho nohovei the catches of othex marine f 1'continued to oie c cbcw 2 ui11ioi oiu por ear The n1ysi by regioii how. ;ha1;ner1y all the roc1w eupportin aor :tj1wrjo uo': moderately or heavily expt«...and that there eve few ii1r oo tíore rpicCIy expendin Some expnion oou]4r;iocour on lightly oloicJ u-oki o co oiiUoul iype oo OX the Pacgonian Bheif ox ìi

ADOPTION O! L.

Page 12: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

the northw tn Indian Ooean w1 on leae conventionl 3tooka auch an Antarcticii'i1ì but much of the further development on the more familier typea of fiah conaideredth ;hie review would bave to come from more retional end better eci lwvveating ofatocia alree4y heavily tiahed. Unfortunately a more thorough eaamont of the atate ofmany atooke t&i made difficult by the inadequacy of banjo atatiet-J.c3- and other dataa

9 Inadequate, incomplete or delayed statistical end otr information continued to be amajar impediment to botter and more tiiiy ac:c-.t b-te of fish atooke- The basicresponsibility for improving itati icr enc other dc. with the individuai governments,and. the Committee stressed that go-ornmet chorcck oc th commitment to collect2compilo and disseminato adequate statistica and pecially with respect tofisheries on stocke exploited by more than one oouy sj ,rrb±cs still lack the neo-eseary institutional xraniments and staff propor.L ,- icticc and data couac-t:on, and therefore training in these subjects needa o h'i priority0 It was noted

t increasing phais was being given in FAO ±5-eid pro. c.itiOUL r U2':touz regional progrwes to improving statistics and tra. Mt Th tds welcomed and -the desire was expressed that the into :be

by FAO end its Depc.rtinent of Fisheries should be strong-bho i;; \OX1L.stitution in obtaining rea

io It was suggested thut i-b would he useful if the diffic » hd riaen iicollection of adequate data could be pinpointed, posaibly hj Co thuating 1or1cing hartyfor Atlantic Fishery S-batietics0 This body had greatly hlped the woxl of reporting to andcompilation o± data by regiona]. bodies in the Atlantic ou1. might extend its scope to otherparts of the worith It was also au sted that a lVr nupi of statietics would be facil-.itated by olear and specific guidance on the typoc tail of data tua-t should be collected0In this connection it was proposod. that u. small 'oip of specialista should, with the cooper-ation of the Advisory Commit-toe of cperts on rin Resources Research (ACNRR), excuntzie indetail the quality and scope oi' data that aro required, .nd -the procedures for data collec--

tion, compilation and dissemination0 In many fiahories it is difficult to collect data inthe detail wished by scientiats and others but, even in these situtiona, it should be poccible to collect adequate data for guiding -the dovelopmoat and manaement of such fiiherieí;

11 It wea atreaaed. that timely aupply of da-ba wa ercontia]. ptioularly in respect ofatooke with high variability or which were in need of men -c.nb, While complete data,particularly for ioug-rana fihoriee, might not be avilah.L or aome montha, i wan notedthat some regional bocUec in the North Atlantic request, c iioiifoer countries supply, pre-

limiriary catch statietics very quick.lyQ It was felt that IAO should similarly request earlydata, particularly in respect of atatistical areas that are the responsibility of FAO bodiesond the Committee urd member countries to comply with auch requests0

12 It was noted that lit-tie information had been presented about co-oalied umconvitiolspecies, including Antarctic 1rill0 ut these resources were of gci importootia]. supply of food for -the benefit of the world community as a whole0 FAO should thereforegive attention to the collection and compilation of information on these rosourcos and theirstate oÍ' exploitation so : to onsrn'o their rational exploita-tien and to facilitate in thebug torta the full prbioipation by developiug couutriea The Committee requested the Sec-rotai-it to report on this xn-ter to ita next uuOiO

13 The Committee on Fiaherica at ita Ninth Soaion (i974) ad that thfornitionregarding economic end aocial aepeota of fiaharea whould h i eoi.od t aoh of ita ieí-ajonc to auppiement the annua]. review of the atate of exploitation of the or1driahoryreaourcea The Coiittee ooucidered the firat of auch ro.:; (1(Wi/75/5) which rvwedreceflt trena in the produetion oonumption end kì in th i.tn fihery oiodJ. oa ofitei'ntion1 :importance togother With an aiuouamont of th for tho nxt 12

2

(b) Fiahe Ltuation and outlook

Page 13: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

jj IPFC - Indo-Pacific Fisheries CouncilIOV - Indi& Oc ioIìory Commission

3

14 Noting t t the report would form the basis for the fisheries chapter in the 1975 odi-

tion of FAOs arnival Commodity Reviei and Outlook 1974-75g the Corn ittee expressed its appre-ciation and approval of the reportes format and contents in particu1ai for the current natureof the information0 It tas observed that in complementing the annual review of the state offishery resources9 the report enabled the Committee o conaider in a more complete and com-prehensive er the tihole spectrum of international probleme of fishery management enddevelopment0

15 There ueral E that the lue of such revis would b hanced by more

d information on end evali';tion of trends in the cost of inputs to fishing as tiell

5 formation on fleets manpn end oti socioocoornic data0 In thic connection atten-

t on iae dratin to the fact tha much relevant information concerning the developed countriesla already submitted to the O enication for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) andrevieed by i ts Coemittoc on F.oheriee which tae also referred to as a valuable source ofup-o--date ecoornic data anorally0 It wou].d howover be neceosary9 uithin the cystern which

i[ being or øied by FAO, to collect information on a comperablo baeis from developing cotai-t-iec and, while there we'e al'eady como data in cistenco on foote and manpower9 there wereat present no arrangenonto for collecting data on other inpurJ euch as the coot of fuel

16 The Comuittee requested that consideration ehould bc g5en to he posoibility of pre-paring and distributing commodity roviewe more frcuontly thon annually0 It uas suggested

that AO should eaine the poibilitioe of ectabliching en iaternational market information system deoiod to poovido both developed and developing countriec with regular, up-to-date market telligenoe0 At the came time oth delegations felt that PAO chou].d give

reator attention to studioc ecmining the lo ,rocpecte for the morketing of fishery

commodities0

17 The Committee noted that at a when total ounpiios of fish were barely increasing,there tiers diffiouitio in diopooing ol' oupplieo in sorno parte of the world despite the

shortage of food in othero0 It wan obciorvod that the problem arose from general tronde ineconomic development, in particular differoncoc in income levels0 Unicos bacio causeo wereremoved, this may hamper tho welcome exponsion of flohories by developing cotrieo foretports to earn their much n000d foroii enchango0 The Committee re-emphasized the needfor greater attention to inadccpiaoioo in procorvation, marketing end diotribntion facili-ties0

18 The Cowiitteo also dioctvieod pblicioo end meocoros bain teken by eotain gou'ornrnontcto encourage fiohery devoloment and uuggoetod th a moro opocific review of ouch govern-

ment actions might be undertaken by the Committee at a futuro cession0

(o) Activitios of regional fishery bodies

19 The Coimittee emp.ized the important role that regional fishery bodice had, ong

other functions, in enouring the full end rational exploitation of fish recourcoe0 Itnoted that this rolo, at any rato for ]?AO hodioo, te changing from one that wan oosentiallya matter of diijongoing and enchonging the recuite of ocientific otudico and other informa-tion, to one that wan mere directly concerned with the management of heavily fichad stocksnd with the development aepects of fiohory aetivitioo in oaoh area0 In this oecond stage,

the information and data activities trill continueend indoeti become more importantbutwill tend to bo moro oloocly lin:ed to iimodiate problo!o, particularly in the formulationof possible management moacuroo0 It oes noted that in the northeact Atlantic those tworoles were, for reasoo of history, being carried out by two distinct bodies0

20 The progress bing aohiovod by subsidiary bodies of FAO, especially those that had metsince the lest cession of the Committee, wee noted0 Particular metiou ws made of thejoint IPFC/IOFC jJ Sytosium on the Economic end Social Aspects of National Fisheries Pion-

Page 14: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

4

ning. The Committee especially welço....r:.-, the s-tops being -baien, including the follow-up ofthis symposium, -to enable the I?FC -to meet it responsibilities to the region more ade-quately,

21 There was some discussion of the vole of the Committee vis-s-vie the regional fisherybodies, both inside and oixbjdo FAO. It was felt -that the proper function of the Committeewas to review cri-tically their overall performance and the degree to which they wore main-taining the stocks and the fisher-cu on -them in a satisfactory condition. In this cormec-tien -there was a general feeling that, while regional bodies bad. rua-de commendable prou esain difficult circumstances in recent years, this progress barely kept pace with the morcas-.

ing needs t'or proper mnnament of heavily fished stocks.. In particular, few bodies, eveuwhen maintaining the l'ish stocks at a rr.000nablo level, had bc uccescmul in ensuringeconomically healthy ±'iherioc, bu-t i noicd that iome hoc1.oc bd iniroduoed controlmeasures in anticipation o± cloar evide:c,

22 The Oonmiitoo cood that noverai ctepe might be ot4ar uy X'AO to im-prove the pr:?ornw.00 of regional bodio9 especially in ro'c1 to itic Qnd. other data,

and to took a eEJaNtt; and tbat improvement in the enforcemnt of ecouimonded meaeuree was

doirabie9 Inadeqicy of ottios azLd other data wa a c3 p'obiom and one in whichregional bodies baci major rewjouibiiitie. Thec inclucicd -1ie compilation of data z'eported

the activo purew. of other data b he available rc o reported and, cepeciallyin re8peot o± developing member cnis9 ieitance to them in their data collection work9Po meet theee reeponøibiiitias, it w coiod that regional bodìee muet have adoqnatefunding0

23 It was noted. that AO could not provide ita regional bodies With -the desirable degreeof support to enable them to carry out ail their functions, ticularly in statiatios, a-t

least not within ii;s Je r ñ'cgrammo. The Committee was informed., however, that supportwas being provided by the United. Nations Development Progrw e (UND?) ng regional pro-jects and -that this w enabling come si ficant improvements to be achieved, e.g. 1-nrespect of catch and effort statistica in the Eastern Central Atlantic. Ii rocommendodthat euch support be continued and iucroed until -the national capabilities to provide sta-tistios and. other d- for the regions were raised -to the desired level. Stock assessmentswould be improved no-t only by botter data but aleo by an increased. number of experienced.specialists in tlu fi)cl in both clevelopod. azid- developi. countries. Plus w a matter ofbetter training, nd the holding of -training courses in stock assessment and related sub-jects should continue 1th the assistance ot' FAO.

24 another way to improve the et'ficincy of regional bodies could be by botter 000rdinationbetween them. A si or an infovmal meeting, bringing tothor the staffs of these bodies,would he1 identify methods of improving their offctivsness and in reviewing possible commonservices. Particular advantage might be iued by iategrating some of the etatistical anddata activities in-to a common network.

25 A numb?r of opioc of general in-bereut, which merited muore dotxled ex&uination bythe Comîn1-ttco nd warrontod otuy by -the FAO Secretariat, were idoatifi.od. The problemof ciiveraion of effort from a stock coming under quota or other w icit to other tooks

was sopecially mentioned. The more comprehensive system of quotas thin 'the North Atlan-

tic reacio diversion tiithin thic region less likely bu't at -the same tire inorceasod. the pro-bability of signi2ioau-b diversion of some fleets to areas ou-tide the North Atlantic andoutside the iin?dia-o responsibility of 'the North Atlantic bodies.

26 A pazrticu].ar caee o interaction between different regione 'iae tuna. Not only i-athere coneidorable movement of tuna veeao].r3 betweon 000aucJ, hut 0.130 of aome etooka. The

opinion OipX i:CL prevtoue. osaioxw et' thu Couittee that corain *peotc of tuna datahandling, r'oh and mnagemont would be be c1elt With by come global arrangement, wasrepatod; thi , howevcr uithou pro judice to tho juriedietional c].aima of the coastalStat 080

Page 15: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

5

27 Within the North At].aitjo th wtprd quota ytni we sending to bring &outreauction in Iie size of fl.eets, nd could id to iwprovod economic perQr1LI8flCe; howeverthe need. for bett?r econoniic ruiri baci o far in ener1 received. re].tive1y little at-ten-tian from regional bodies M ot the oonomic apcet of mnagzunt are of qiitegnera1 rs1evanc, e coidrabion of iy of iiiatchiug i.nput (numbers of veae1 etc),to the magnitu1e of tho a1].ow.b1e catcli, an ìt could. be ho].pîu]. for these to be dìousedby the Commi-t-e This could a10 faoi3itate the transfer of exprie1ce froza the NorthM;:Lantio anil other J'egionB where aaaeiiet Iad boen prob1en for ìeoies and. ia nowbethg actively nd oi'teu successfully dealt with, to other regions in which tho needa wereculy recently becoming apparent0

2b As a par-ticulai' oxaiiple of economic cenai eration, il; was noted that the ree-I. returnsrom fiahiflg OQU1d be improved by a system of catch quotas that did. not react too violently

to fluctuationa in the fish stock but minimized the VeriatiQus in the emmt taken by eachcountry in successive yee-re even though this might cause some slight fall in total grosscatch over the yes. At the a time, i-t was rscoised that within the total allowableo'tch there could be changes in the proportions taken by diffe-rent countries, which mighttake account inter alia of the gitiinate aspirations of developing countries,

29 The Commit-tee discussed the possibility of the s regional bo dealing with fisherymanagement end the LIIemamOnt and control of other uses of the oceans, including activitiesthat cause pollution. !hils any impact of those uses on the fish stocks should he taken intoaccount in fishery managemente.g. in setting the level of the allowable catchin generalthe nature of the problem, and the institutions eM teresin involved were so differentthat, .ri the view of oevcs.aJ. dologat.one, they wci best denl with by ceparate regionalbodice. For countries ni-tb limited ste-ft end there could, however, be some advan-.-tage in combination of funotiona,

(d) Review of the status and cow osition of the J'isheCowmni.ttco for the Jastern Central Atlantic (SEC

30 The Committee considered this item on the bmis of document CQFI/75/7e This documentbad been submitted for cçsmnent -to the member countries of CECA]?. The Cowwitte heard anoral report on the substantive comments that bad been received at the Urne from four oi.r ofthe 28 member countries0

31 As regards uembership of CECA?, the Committee was of the view that the criteria laiddown by the Council of'D'AO fox' the selection of member countries by the Director-Generalwere sufficiently broad and flexible to meet requirements and new developments. It wasinformed that in practice the Director-General selected new member countries upon theirrequest and in consultation with the Bureau of CECA?.

32 The Committee noted that CECA? was called "cowiui-ttee" because it had been establishedunder Article VI-2 of -the FAO Constitution and conited of selected Member Ne-tious andAssociate Members of the Orgenizat-ion. Changing t'te name to UoommiseiozzH would require adecision of -the Council to reconstitute CECA? wider Article VI-1 of tlie Constitution as abody, the membership of which uculd be cuori to all Member Nvti.ona and. Asoce-l.o Members oFAO, Th Conmii-ttee reached th conclusion that such a oh5n'4 was nc4 warranted at thepresent time particularly as memberhip oould be enlarged under the present statutem.

33 The Committee noted that, wi-thin the definition of its toxins of refereric, CECA? hadbeen able to develop LtS e-ot.vities ux a very aat.sfe-ctory manricmr as regarda both tho man-agement and developimnn't of fisheries in i-te area, It therefore ag'eed that there we-s rie

need to modify 'the functions of CECA?,

34 however, 'the Coìttoe felt that the question of the composition, statue and functionset' CECA? should he kept uridei rov1e, 1t voqwmrted the ocx etariul, to submit to the nextsession of CECA? a. report ombodying -the views emmarised iii the preceding pat" :: apha, e-awell as the comments received from the mober con-tries of CECA? oir document C0F1175/70

Page 16: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

35 In he ooure of the debate refer wa niade to the rgen need for aeeseing theniate of exploitation of the living reeouroee in the Eastern Central .4.t].antic0 The Coni-mittee reconmended tha- the CECAF Sub-Coiuittee Qfl ageniont o± Renotirces within theLimite of National Juriediction ehould be convened at an early dMe to review the aituationand formulate appropriate recomxnondations0 It requested the Secretariat to obtain and. as-emb1e the fullest possible information on actual and planned exploitation of resources inthe CECAF area for the use of thè Sub-Conimittee0

COORDINATION OF MULTILATERtIJJ Ai BILATERALASSISTANCE Ék iiisuÉy on' ocs36 Using as s. basis document COFI/75/59 the Conwuittee diecmssod procedures for the givingand receiving of multilateral and bilateral assistance to fishe'y development programmesand reviewed the role of FAO in relation to the coordination end øffective use of such aid..a significant trend. is the tendency for bilateral aid to be disbursed within a multilateral

uìiework and for bilateral donors to make use of FAO's epecialícd knowledge and experienceth executing assistance projects. The Committee agreed that whilrt id coordination at thecountry level is o1eriy the responsibility of the recipient guverninent concerned, the of-fctive use of technical and othx assistance depends essentially upon the fullest flow ofinformation between recipient countries, donor countries and iu].tilateral agenoise.

37 112 this rsepeot the Committee emphasized that FAO is uniquely placed to play a vitalrole in the collection and dissemination of information ori matters of interest concerningdevelopment assistance in the fiehsries sector0 Whilst noting the importance of FAO'sbasic aotivitien in collecting collating and presenting data on the world catch and itsutiliation resource potential aM prospective oonsusiption and in sponsoring internationalweetings concerned with fishery management and development the Committee requested that theOginization should in addition systematically collect asalye and disseminate informationon fisheries aid on donor criteria and. the needs of potential reoipients In thin conriec-tien9 the Committees together with regional fishery bodies, could. provide an appropriateforum throuh thich to cohige tuoh data. rft esmbly of the data would depend heavilyupon the 000prciou Of doflor aoiss and recipient countries in the supply of information9and mimbs o ii1isr pGrJod their wiulin'iees to participate in such a procoss

38 2hu oI!diiY;uo u1Lju :doroc. FAOÎU cowinui tiorl: in he1piii uovntioe u-ith fisheriesuocto de iuiuit p1ii!.ig mnd rojeot proporation0 ocw dev opinent p12nninC arid. in-dccuLto rojo pi hwe boon idontified. i boina oin oi the iairi cono-Vraints tothu noo efîoctvo u.Ju ci nid, o.id zhilu . owiu inmibea- o. uovtxiu hi nou ostablishedfnirly uophitj-cztud -ion&l pnuln oieou, in others9 upeoi&iied cs istnce from FAOin thoic eru zould. b tjo:Leojiod, A uiiibu o iuinboro tho attention to tho inpoz'tanoeof poLitpx'o juut o:uu nnd to tho nuod. fornally to ovniutu the uooeos or otherwino ofupocific iohcry devclopiiiunt pro co; thu Oonwittou ag.e'd that WO had au iraportc.ntoont'iutiou to w!:o by riiutiii donorri uud Luoipiontti in uuoh o entu intrcoi of thu ltnt owludo cpxirod

39 Thu Om*tue ncybud tiiM the UiD? v.0 in thu p oucuii of tiuw!j ito 000diiMionOOhiLLiLJ ULd -LJ to p!aou uutoì uiphaoiu than bcfo ou uitu tc, fiuher 6.evulop-.

IKilt 1)O UL!J1uU9 t1ouh tonni t2Ldinur--oionni pio juotu £n thin contoxt,th Oonittuú that i4unal und intuiugic,na1 pì'o juoto o:Luurly oifurud uoa'o foi the000rdinLi.tion ai tuU?uopmuut aLJUitJ.tnco und fo ttiwiupj 1i1atcral uouiouO of aid, aiidnotud .1th utiuio-jLoi thu yotht uib o' untih po'&iiiuIuu uìn uutabiiuhud. o uuppotsdby &O

40 tuutiun wi to ho taut a± uthniniutciriw aid p ii.uwtu und, in viuw of theiu' oóo-tiau o L from biltural uouioou tli-;, iltilMo:I,

i upitly 'tair far Luru to ouio that adcjuatu ,.,,vLuiuu -u mude £oi'uj[jtLli,

41 In viow of ui i üraiia competition for rout:underlinod thu uru. fo aolAbiuued und inprovod conuni : ;ion Êiu'm

1 :.hutj, the Coiuiittee

uìou9 rooipients and

Page 17: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

execting aoiee to achieve the irrnm effioincy in fishery development sistance0 It

agreed that whilst each ooimtrys aoeoifio and unique needs must be reoonized there weremeny common factors which made i.- desirable to consider the overall problem of developmenton a broad basis0

42 The Committee stressed. that JJ'AO ie in a etong position to meke a major contributionto the more effective coord.inat on in' rntio:;., efforts to promote rational progrnmesof fishery development0 Obse:u ",Li' one cf ' KJnnl results of the United Nations Con-ferco on the Lcu of ho I to bc u c'o in the need for tecimical assis-anc to the fisheries of d've.-:' untr:Les the Gomi.i;tee aeed that the subject should

be kept imder review at

POLEMS OF LÂ1)

43 The Coimsittoc d5 vft3oJ. "ii ic :r;1 o onts COFI/75/9, COFI/75/1OC'OFI/75/Inf 4 d GOT" /75/ ' 3 - f' hc d cusoxon of thesneral papers relating o r topt hrt'c, rb() l Ji i.abester Chairman of

sub-Commission iii of ti , :cnl 'ici Yr 'ne uisiou (E.tFAC) on thev;zx'k of BIFAC in relation t , oo,:'\

44 In the disouion c'Ter í 'f :izi].and fisheries theimportamos of fi'h o ' I ' orn many of the dovelopincountries op'îi. C e'c'c t1:, i ,l o:nansion of both oaptw'e fish-enes and fish pro oioi '.'ov,» pi ulnn'e c-n'c xio,-,ed. in many areas of thewonld Aqaculturo nrtcuJLarly tTì seen 'i prr' lo c ibm for a considerable in-crease of aniu4 protei.n Dele.tions strongly ,':.'::ried the proamme of FAO with redto inland waters 1:i felt that moro emp1r:i. hrr,ld b placed on this problem with inten-ifioation and expiou of both a4quotoru ;:i'riìes and project activities in thefield. It was d that the scope fo development of inland fisheries in most ofthe developing eout ice lo.vgc nd 'U'a FAO siovld iutnsfy i.s 1wrk in Ghls sector,in particular in the matter o irthe'' rcscct,ch c'ad trnnsfer of available teohnolo to

improve the stocking arz to iurxNa ' irt3 hectrn of inland ;Ors045 Much interest was sho in matters arising from the talk Qn water cuity control andthe derivation of un o qr y e !. c, ' cand in -"c l'i t' Mny oowttries arebeginning to have probl :,uo.atQd u tli wctor ïtlity ctn it i's onerally felt thatadvice was needed boorc. th p:obloo become ciocprod li,. this connection the role ofEIFC was strongly aprociatd. cid broader efforts along these lines by other inland fish-ery bodies were consideied appropriate0

THE WORIC OF FEO IN TE FIE1D Oit' 'ISIE'Th I.WD GREGULAR

46 The Committee ezressed general satisfaction with the presentation and oontent ofthe docusent on the Programme of tork of FAO in the field of fisheri.os dvning 1976-77(COFI/75/11) whioh contained. introductory paragraphs of a general nature in Part I whilePart II was devoted to the sub-progrnoo of the Department of Fisheries under the RegularPrograe. Part III gave details of thc Field Programme arid some indications of it rela-tion to the Regular Programme Several delegations felt that this last part should in thefuture be enlarged to give further details and. to allow closer comparisons with Part IL

47 The Coneittee was informed, that for the 1976-77 Regular Programme a net programme in-orease of 19 percent (at 197/75 coste) was being proposed. for the Department of Fisheriesin the Siimi'y Programme of Uork . Thicl;oi oubi'tod. to th FAO Council0 This comparedwith proposed net proçtv'tts increo:;es el 2 pent for the Forestry Department, 25 percentfor the Economic and. Social Donar aent end 48 procnt for the Agriculture Vspartmerzt0While the Committee noted 'pith sorne concern that the increase for the Department of Fish-ones would b relatively it exprossed satisfaction at the way the reoonnientionsand comments of th Committee made at its proviens esrions as to the activities to whichpriority should. be givc'n had. been met to the o:ton iOflbhlee

Page 18: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

48 The Committee noted with partioiz satisfaction the rapid recent growth in the FieldProgramme, which was still mainly financed by UND?, but to which trust funds provided bybilateral development agencies were making an increasing contribution0 It was informedthat the question of UND? agency costs had. now been clarified in the sense that the paymentsby U1DP (a-t present at the rato of 14 percent) wore exclusively for project formulation (2percent) and non-technical support (12 percent), FAO bore the other costr3 including anyexcess of the cost of pro ject formulation and non-technical bactopping, and the total costsof overall policy-making bodies? planning and technical backstopping0 Taking account of allthese items, the actual overhead costs borne by FAO were estimated to be 19 .roent and ac-cordingly there was a. difference of about 5 percent between the figure paid by UND? and thetotal cost0 At the 1974 level of the Fisheries Field Programme, this amounted to approxi-mately half a million dollars a year from Regular Prosamme funds, which themselves amountedto somewhat less than U.S0 Z4 million a year.

49 The Committee questioned whether or not the rapid growth of the Field Programme withoutapnropriate increases in the regular bu. tt was hnpering the execution of the Regular Pro-rmeQ The situation needed to be watched to ensure that the overall programme for which

tht Department of Fisheries eponsible could be carried out in an orderly falmion0growth of the Field Fo would require special sffortm in recruitment and the. Com

mitt ce noted that improveiner; in recruitment planning was already being made and would becontinuad0

50 Th Committee further noted. tìrnt the Director-General in implementing a policy ofdoc tra1iztion ua proposing very sub entirU ien in the budgets of FAO regionaloffices a part of vihich would. be devoted. to teher or tork The Commi tee strongly en.-

dorod the Gonoeptí of dec traliatiou1, pertioularly in the sense that it would providegreater support to the regional fishery bodies , but otressed. howevr that deceniraliza-tien muet not d o rsmentatiou of FAO's fishery pro ammo which needed. to be effectivelyp1uiecl and 000rdiucted by tho Department of Fisheries under the gui.dance of the Commìtteeit,e:i

51 Tho Com;teo £elt that omsc eiTert must be macle to evaluate more thorowhly theresults o the Deportment's ork particularly under the Field Progrinne, perhaps by in-depth studies of particular rioctoz's of 5CtVitYm possibly by outside erts0 It wasrealized? however, tt evaluation of individual country projects in particular might bdifficult0

52 In studying Part ri of the d.ocument mbers expressed their general support for thenine sub-progrms and the bre&. own of resources between tIiem

Fishery resources survey d

53 Phis continues to be one of the basic aspects of the proaurne in fisheries, somedelegates pointed out that the information provided a result of iìrk under this sub-prore should be of a ld.nd that would enable developing countries to preparo feasi-bility utudies on the basis of which they could obtain support for investment projectsfrom public or privatem national or thtornatio sources of finance. Such informationwas also essential for ratio management of fish stockai, end was especially importantwith respect to those harvested by moro than one country0

54 It was urged that further efforts were needed to collect better statistics and dataneeded for stock ovalwtion0 Every effort i t be u ..e to ensure that data provided wereup to date end tiere put to ¿od we. FAO should further ;ingbhen it functions as auorvioin& agency to p'ovids info ution on various poctm ei' fisheries within the frame-work of -the into c ita otsui of the Do tuent of Fioheris Special attentionshould. be given to ttmo need for strengthening national capabilities in resource evaluation,

Page 19: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

Fishery resources: 'et55 The ment programme w small and ii was one where the future role of FAO had notyet been oloarly identified. FAO should expand its assistance 11% this area in view of thelikely o in the regime of the seau Countries will wish to continue -to develop theirooastal fisheries and. Will have to acquire the ezpertise to m'o their fishery resources0FAO could help with this9 both nationally and regionally0

resources: environmeirt

56 This was an area where FAO cooperated with the many other ors. izat ions thab were con-ce'nzd with various peo-te oi' environment and pollution0 Work under this sub-programmehad been carried out, o a 1ar extent, with extra-budge-tary funds, including those from'tho United Nations Iivironment Programme (UNEP) and. bilateral donors, particularly theSwedish International Development 'cy (SI]) Some deletions expresaed concern about-the level of funding under the Regular Progr- n»e no-t bein increased and, accordingly,fishery interests migirt be jeopardized if the Department of Fisheries was no-t in a positionto maintain ita loading rolo in -this field0 It was noted, however, that much work had beendone during the current biennium -to contribute touardw the protection of living resources

d. fisheries from pollution0

Flehe resources rrultur

9

57 General support t: tj expressed. for the strengthening of the aquaculture progr i It

was thought that exeion of aquaculture might be spurred by the more ed coct of marinofishing operations. Aquaculture could contribute to increasing supplies of protein foodd thi: especially important in countries where there was a protein gap, It could. also

help build up exports oÍ' high-value products to earn foreign exchange. The rwtic improve-.meut of stocks could 'be an important factor fox' the future. Special attention should. begiven to wa-tar quality criteria and to the protection from pollution of areas suitable foraquaculture. The Ooumìttee noted -that the Aquaoullure Development and. Coordination Progrwas now in operationQ Sirorig support tas expressed for the Technical Conference on Aqua-culture which to b h].d in Kyoto in ay and June 1976e

:

Increaain. fish rod.uotio.

58 The Coi*itteo stressed the importance of eu-llscale fisheries, and ozpreased agroomentwith the increasing wsis the Dopa tment wee giving to these activities The muall-ecalofisheries progroeme cj oriowted in a psitìvo end. reaListic way Particular attention wasdx'wn to the fact that projeots should. be well integrated., that new teolmiques introducodshould be adapted. to conditiona in local OOflÌ 'ities, d thvt improvements in fishing boatsengines and. gear ahould be matched with improvements in landing, storge, processing endmarketing facilities0

59 The importance of oinall..scele fisheries lay in their economic and social &spootu andparticularly the cmployment provided0 It was, however, r000g4isod. that those fisherieswove frequently not profitable and o±'fortu ahould be made to rectify this by measures ouchas improving the apeolficatione for boats and. organising cooperativos of various kinde(production, supply, oed.it) for small-scale fishermen0

60 The Committee also noted, With nt, tht L'or fish industry dvelo.'ent goner.-ally, the D tmeat tas concentrating on promoting cooperation between well-establishedindustries and ins-titwUonz in the developed end dovolopin countries,

i

61 The Oo iitoo oiirecU tuo need o' proved oilitioo fcn the li, orcio, pro-000siR2g and. dl ribuion o? ih und iiehery pod.uoto end drew p tinu:tur c ention to thQneed to oiat dovoicipi iu in providing fot ion on potentiel opob metotuand pricou f'or voiou fiul y piod.uots t aloe opioiuod tho i otanoo ei' a iotin thedeveloping couxi.trioo in boing progrnoo or quality oontrol and. fiulz iflop3rtion

Page 20: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

lo

peoí1iy to nu'e iha; ported ±i&;y pxodtLctI3 niet b.ic hy ie.e reqnn1L id cow.-rnodity a'de w'e beiflg on n inter tiozi.1 hjo .62 Attention wa th'nzn o the fo i ro.ucing 1o..co proc ing thnicIÌe in thedveiopiii, outr'c Io 9W Wt 1,hc pi.c o 1e'y pioUuot, Leuauecl %-n.Lh1n the ieaohof oontuner Tho impQrrcQ of. povrc fi.thtry oduçti for hum, coni.inption re a].3o

63 Th Coim;Ltto £clt ha o or i.md at cLi ih pX'OdUCttQU muwV be matohsd byçíu1 eft'ort to ewo thai oaoho weo prop?riy u11c tW1 1b3t preeent WOZ'ld 1Ve1of 'ite poU(e ue ruc1

2Qr:si22(' ;hc pcpo;o1 Proi' mc f 11ors for coo.'o w ihc Coittoh?1ieVjI hwi Ve thorJ1 continue 'o give hi}i ::ccty çi 'hor'o civitjrn.1 The

of 1mIn ;ci countriei, thvouh thc' Oouwby xpoeti.ve 1tu'T very ;Lmportnt ao he on fishery comuQdil;y iycii iïch roviowea the 1on4rw

)b',J prQr3pccto ÇQ\ thr' iflU. Of LcCtCCt fi13o Vuorlc wou1t ocn' iu yOC iiQfl Of comp C)1T r I fo jo it veetj

1tioiz o1berpx,oc fxiu di.:'c.cat oovtr.o

6 Th :;x'ow1.;.G f reiona1 o'tivit:co an roconied nc :'J, uuppoz't wac ivonr hc ( opcnc in cigrac the oomi huii4 Ct ij Ao'ect that poLblo xtenDien

OL Ç rL .itb(w jurthct&oYL woui.d, u eovcrrl ouri, reu.LL in the need. or expmno.on of.cç,vj 'cÌr ptcuJ.r1y where ooaetcU utntou tiere developing oountrie In prom

mntiiig dovoioeiot Wvoloping countrioe had aleo to work together in many in-Lic roly ho rejon.L1 îliory bodieri tiic cctw'.t,oA of whoh woc aoordimi,od.

thie oivwìeo woLd he called. upon to play ¿ moxe înipçirtcxit role acuiutingLhe çounI u, h th ouiii'Lt,ion and. oQduabLou o nevroe x'oi L'hery mana-emntond ctnvol C1oe c 'c'u ohoi].cI bQ ivn o porJeib.lJ,t.e!J ci x'cional ooLlabçratoubot,'oon t i ohn ccl. t i iituiion d lo the uçu up whc o 'eael.bto of regional:ìi or voc2tiona1 training mece in itutee oentrei ehould. beai';tod in reaching regional 3tunclarde of

?4L:66 Tho ÇomwLi;toc; ono nioo the importaxìce ci' othcwion nc trtni at U 1cve].aEud th oiJ. oor. Pi view woi opreîod. that itt inffiI,inoy pooib1y the rnjorcnot;raint ;ø fJ.ohory 1ì()vo1opont0 The Conmitiee the?ofore wolcoweO. the propoíod Gtrength-ciAg of Thi rjb rormïno otd tbvt the need foz ii;ionJ. c±Tortn in this etorwiid beoome ovan more preLei ae icite1oping oountrìee incee. thea' coitro1i over coawtalwvteoo zid cxpi4ed thetr i witriou coording1y

67 rtinin w rquird for cii cvbeor.ec of high cnd diunievs1 perí3crnn], adJBini.-iLuhe.L.ioe eflLIt3 ud erar inan-irie p'LouneJ0 Ivh L.mi.od oux'ce abao lon di;Cfieuit to otrilco but e±'forti riboulO. be co ntated. on the training

Qf AnptIucborJ in Iho thve1opin, Qoutr.ec on biuLdin up the oapcity of ezirting tra.nininutiut i ana. priouLarIy x'egion. training inetitutiune. The C ittee iscoendedthvt priority ihou1t be giv to stx'engthEkniig exivbiu ti.tubion to cater adequatelyfor crowing rcion]. ring r irente tt w aleo propoeed that offorte ehould bewade to increase the diei;ribution oÍ training inazivaie other rberia]. in appropriatelenguages Attontion wae th'tin to the 1acilitie provided. i eeveral covntriee for trainiucovree L'or eoientitE d teohnologite from dvelopin ca&rieo und. the value of ex-chnge of pereonnel betwen iretiiutioue wac reeeed.

Page 21: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

C( .:E ION DI ¶E UNIPFD ICÏ

i:-f;ionC_Co

11 -

ioe68 The Committee aa a ho1e e-pressed satiaction about the results and effects of thework of the UDP/FAO inter-regionaJ. and glob.L proammes in ostorin development in thefisheries sector particularly for the devslopin oowitries There i strong support forad&itional assistance in this area to w'e the coordination of development activities,cot only ori an iuter-re-ional basIs but :Lo to eneure the most effective delivery of s.lassistance being provided from bilat) ud multilteïa1 souroes Mention was made bysever. delegates o± the need for a effective arruch to the mantement of resourcesin ca1 areas9 particularly in vi cL' he poible outooris of the United Nations Confer-eno c. the Law of the Sea

69 Committee consired item on the basip of doov.inents COI/75/1 2 endo'/75/Inf3 It commanded the Secretariat on the ueefuness and tiality of the in-fo: Qn provided on the rftj Scr).on oZ' thc Co ?rrcuo? on c -;: ìf the Sea that had.

ld in cnev-a froi 7 o 9 i : -:cr a9preoic!.tion forfuvther contz'ibui. nade by th Depc:trcit ,-' o'Ìz ol' the Conference

Delegations referred in partikYv1:'r o he hiEL ri a. lu.e o th reporton FAO the FO Co ïtto on )chtoe d d onJ. Kichory bodìoo TheCommittee inictcd thv he i :ptent o :-'. hc').or iud eontinu to provide such tech-'ucal and scon..L',.c nc' e ho Co croro '

70 While roeogaizìu tho Comit;oe could pOjid noi' prejudice the outcomeof the Confcreoe, mcuy dclnticcc ntveceoU 'br; inì vieti9 thc Committee ud ÀÂOyould have to i'ruv iicro:acjo 'cwponcibilition c'ad to thin ovid, the timo hadIo asoose oho-torm ud lontorm uedo in tho eoor, rI0 Uiechare ofresponsibilitioc tîoru,1.d be jeov'rdi,ed br f'ç oL' ';10 (oiittoc', ai the only intev-governmental boy Wali.0 -tri. Ith fihory policy oi tTorld'-yide baic , to ev1luzte at thisat ,e the action that uld he rti.irod aîl;or the ouìevenoe of a new roime9 whatevoi' thatmight be0 The uiier). character ai' the c}itmgoa th% ou d affect fi3herieo umis already'apparent end it uaí sscntial to cnrure thet theec ohijs would no disrupt thetien arid idiiition or the iic resourcee of he oa Par'tin r emphasis was placedon the need to foster t'ud acoelcre the of ec o)í, to developing coastalstates and provide theai with support arid advice on fishery u: and developmentThe r 'oral fishery bodia established within the fremoro! o.' AO tould have to play aleading role in achieving this obectivo0 In this oouioc Lou, it uas noted with apprecia-tion that measures ha4 a3.ready been -teken or were being eken to strengthen thee bodies9As re de other fishery bodies, it was suggested that FAO could assist them in theiradaptation to new conditions I-t was also oba1elvod. that efforts should be made to ensurethat o d circumstances should. not result in excessive difficulties for a certain numberof countries In coxiolunion, a number of delegations proposed that, as a first step, thestudy of' the above matters should be entrusted by the Committee to its Sub-Committee on theDevelopment of Cooperation with International Criations Concerned with Fisheries0 TheSub-Committee would report to the nect session of the Committee0

71 Some delegations stated that they had reservations about the need to undertake thisstudy at the present times since they felt that there was as yet no sufficiently clear in-dication regarding the final outcome of the Conference on the Law of the Sea0 In theirview, it would be difficult to determine what assumptions the Sub-Committee should take asa baste for ì-ts work0

72 The Committee ìna].1y iìecided that a meeting of the Sub-Committee should b convenedear].y in 1976 amicI requested the Secretariat to arrange and prsare the documentation endinformation -that be nccessary with the nid oL outside ccperte aa appropriate9 Uponthe reoonendation of a draftiu group, which met wider the chairmanship of the Chairman

Page 22: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

of the Commit-tee ¿tocç', i (;» / j,jiinendmerte o Reoiuì.0 U) ¡/ çì»zñ the ft.»»»»-

(a) :Cn agrph 2 ::. ȍul;. rrh ()The Suorit-;-e

- çj»j rç -i h»'Ì) ; »:

and a'».a»tzia, » »

uLCÄ11 'FC1. t»: ;

C(

eovrcoe uuder

prpo o h» ».» » »»

xa.oïi: »g h1ec11rdiu1' :ç2ûîcaçc» c»ot v br'

O3l 1OI CsC1)L1»kV.0 t'.,cnd »h »r 'e J ay.0 b

'' 1eic o » :.

i. iOCt, coo.Pio U

i,' » c'xrt,) »

iç çi '»

75 fe Conìii ç , C çi I ç

t, ci '.r tho ,i''»»;. - 'c; »: »ç» - », , , '

(IC;TO, -b' »HC i,:»» 1, » -rper1Idor&'. Oi'» :.';'.'': ( ;ç-Ini (-»

.AJp3ìc o? £'.' i' ., ,; »,.:; i1' ,Org ;Lß-bio _"I(O . 1 Cc»-» ;- .- ;'( Iç'::ii»pSup0 i ) ue"uJ. o o'cr»- to io.»: ç :' » 'ç.

76 he Coi iiï' ¿»:i»: .' aten'ir' »to )1(ii

mechanitm0 ].' cp.r »'.. :,m,. ».1. ».-i. for ;1 ' - »»

FAO/IOC Peie]. of )3hould be appo ,irir 'ç ç 'ç,)ll, i nr »'vd » .: -

produote of JDiÏ th çc:Io of :» ç- b u » ' , b»

iii, r-ç,»»;;lt 'çç i

n1e the foilowin.' est'b1iehed

follows

(i ]l',,ç (ççDj,(çççj p,' Nih.hc ' Eea and

»,1h,» i;'jcç:ç and Into»'»'ç»»-

»» 331) chah

,» 'o 1),Cfl ofiCT '"

hh partlo-icw :Cìehcy

i » »»' '' oc 1POççcç cud ihe

order1',' ,»»»iu »ñ.th

)'kC 1<:,çI.ç IC. :' orj,41 ,, I; o . ç i !çj:.LOflL 000p-c-C,'. (COt 1J ç(. »,(iyJ r;O,O, Ln:» »' i.» » ». »»i,,»«I jpoci cJ, problom

O ' tJ C»ú O » lI 'I' I -' I, » '» ,. ,;»',çe-,i I '/» , (,ç , li 'PVA0 COI'

»(;I,i, ,_ o ' ' ' i -1, ' ' »» ç, ,- ».

(b) »'1' -ç-, - ,, ,,;,»,,--,.', ;, », -,,, ,» » », d ,» çl',,ç ,', I ?',CißOP»M of''Io I

' :»»: , i » - » ç » -» ' ». ç i » » - »i »

» »» ç ' » ' . » li Ufli» Od i igdoni .

ç :»» l ,»',i»»»,: - ,»- , ,ç, ,,» Id .. i c » - '»- » - ç jwç,Li id; o thor Meinbr

:, - -i ç (p ''\»( ) »» 'C "ç' »t- » 'p ç ç ç i I, r i ' » » , , » -'C ç 'LI » » ouI O re-ovoEJ o;rta i

':i,i_',h p.' »

' _-'c 'û » 'ç » -» cc»,» , »» ,, I, o» 'i ,, »» i ç» » »

iq -;hat th!.r wero iwt'» ç :; : ç: » »»1 i» C i»:-»ç- 0( 't,hi

'f4 rq o, II''l), » , , -,, ç , » , i' i » I ' i,, » I c, ' p ' I; » ', 'ç i » ç , ' »'Id » 'It L I) tiLt wv' rfrom LQ' Li::,,Li o»,k »»' ,»' » ' C , 'i».,. (Ui » , » p bt-ç» , .I4» ' ci» . ..: t,' u tb'' 3uh -Ooîmi1çoe

(b) J:

»1 i;Ñ»o(13 odic'u t'ud i n par»»».ç çcII,L»tr 11e 000auo8raphy

C - -';: :, -» UTI the :r,nter'o .0 be SoL'»'n;ifio

I L» » » 'i » ,(11» tJ.caouj. ç,vI VO- -' . »-ç1,» , .'»:)/»I c»nt't co'i/i/i 3,

-,-r,. of ICSPRO ac e. coordinating» '»1'» ' I) I :r»o Jw1. a Joint

y -J- ;.om (ASFL3)» ',ic»' L»' '»- ci-i'ìoe't of Uit

'-»ac. 'r-i f'Lrct ineet.in-;

Page 23: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

- 13

would be held in July 1975e It would review the requtresen'ts of marine science and the fish-aries comi3mnity so that AZFIS could meet these.

77 In discusBing relations ',ih IOQ the. Committeo noted its relationship to ICSPROc IOC

served also to cooririate the activities of the or iations participatthg in ICSFO With.espect to aspects of marine science of common concern to them.

78 close collaboration between FAO end ICC was noted With satIsfaction by variotnm del-.egations It ould. be desirable that relationship between FAO and bC bodies should bemore ol'&1y defined., The importance o continuing and etreuthening such collaboration,espeot' 2' i.fl connection with the intcirnational cooperative investiatione varioum globalproj: aud training sud education? stressed0

79 Several members emphasized the need to avoid duplication of fishery activities in theproganr;e Of the United Nations gencies and in particular in the 100-sponsored internation' .l 000perativo thvestitior I wan felt tt these investi#tions tended to includemore 2d rore living rosourece ?ectr , including fisheries sud aquaotz]ture, while FAO andits subsidiary bodies were desid to, and. in fact did work in the rme geographical re'-g-ions these fields. It was pxLnted. out that such cooperativo shouldstimulate and. supplement rather than duplicate the worh of LPO bodies and. fieldpro jeote and that of other agencies It was suemtd 1i rnmho countries should ensure'that their delegations to meetin of other United iom encioc.i be given coordinatedinstructions in order to avoid inconsistencies ande when relevantm be briefed on thespecific capabili.t&es of IAO.

80 The Committee was informed. by the Secretary of IOC that collaboration between the Coin-mission and the ICBPO agenoies anong which FAO ha.s been one of the major contributors,had been inost productive and obviouimly IC5FOvs function as a coordinating mechanism waseffective. In describing the reorgisation of tuo international cooperative iuvestigationin the Caa'ibbean the Secretary of ICC surod the 0omui.ttee that the 0ommision was notinterested in setting up bodies to duplicato the activities of other United Nations onCios

that lie was certain that in the revsod pro'reiiiaos overlapping bctwoc)n the terms ofreference of United Nations bodies nd he arrauccemento for the follot.up of cooperativeinvostition iiuld b effectively avoided.0 The Secretary also mentioned the olos colla-boration between FAO and. ICC in ether international cooperative iuvonione, e.g. theCooperative Invor igations u, the oditovraneau (Cia) cnd the Co orattvo Study of theKuroshic and Ad.,1c'ont Reionn (0S.() nd outlined his plena to ño1.op 'ue:e effective coor-dintiozi Within the .1odite nneíu oo iibai; QRz-QJJAg nctivttios in the marine conoce couldhe undertaken With the viinimu of ilcatiou. The (mmitto noted With intorerit thct auinformation paper could coon be publ.ohcd by ICC on bodice iling with poU.wion.

81 Several members pointed out that it was necessary to avoìd the creation of new bocUeswi-thin th United Nations syst to u.ndevtake new tasks in the marine sciences and in fish-enes; they believed. such new tae should, where poesible be undertaken by existing bodies,

82 The COittOc noted the frher progress made in the implementation of the InteratodGlobal Ocean Station System (boss) and. stressed aiu the importance of identify-Lug thefishery r ixirements of the system as soon as poiblo, The Committee c informed t1ìtFAO was active&y pursuing this matters although the task was difficult c'nd. time-oonsvising

83 The Conitnittee welcomed collaboration with WEP which was not an operational bodrand. believed that U1 support bould be obtained for FAO iork and projects whsiover appro-priate. It OXpDesSed concern about the number of bodiec dealing with pollution andy hero

there was need to avoid duplication.

84 One delegation throw attention to the fact that cooperation in ethiozition and trainingmight usefully be coordinated With the International Labour Organization (ILO).

Page 24: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

85 The Counittee was given 'ocotiut th COFI/75/14 and C0I/75/14 Sup.1, o±the er of concern or icet to i tht had been coneiderec3. by the Sixty-Fourth See-cien f th Council ud that were uot covered under other iteis el the agenda

86 The Coimuittee noted 'y4Lth pD oìiou th the Couoil he'd authorized the Director-Q'eneral to oonu1t with o ri flbor cw th LMin Izterica ende in thelight of thiu concultation to rub1iuh :eionl body undor A'ticle VI-1 of the FAOConet? ution o do& nh ," I- s0 I, iiouud t1ict favourabto rp1iee hadalre&cr beu x'eaeived from a y' jf thu cowtou e crnod and. that the proposedbody could be expected to b or.3y or hlfLuhed uly ± i9?6

87 As edi Ui conu1tatii 'iu h1, beQ O.c3d ïo oxyou; kQr1i -Tho oi ., ,íJo:7 boy ho Ne' arbAci &' he Uo b1 c' L Coroe'ndhud cLei 1Jc4 ud 3h- .., ct'. tb »? jaivo 'Cp.ioúu! ,i'O ji a o

d pr'úi 1hJ ocj 1iQuc ) Oo1obc-3 Libc 974) 1 du u O; tl ': 1l ou lJhct14 u voidoth.J'L.4 c r.1íiO OZ'1iThLi CX OU DLLt?IJOIJ Li UY) Jl» J N1J ctc1. VX1CtiOW

Ihh 10 'j.: (;? p:ti wc jO1 'hi : ip b.ou 1ic Ooxoii Lu iet id 1io Oct çxi it ad'iub1,

i :orico ar ;Lcju h'c 1wo oovo1 d the couoiwiiouriu:41 UJ) iid cj DJpoo U hox o thi cte 1c

jOÍtJ U!O O)V1 QL)d 1ìu Uo.. O hb Oce bhOo bo

tjJJ cj) vL,u bhj rsut um Oo 'u !.0 euìu: u) &b.o PU.LU

i&ci[JO C (J3d vo o bothi0 ao'ot ii.h,, 3flrU '' orj aci

W&Y íJ;4:flA p)F '&J iì6 )i': ' 'Í u_: .

89 2'hu Oor!Lli;oc) LíLÁ u:úio : 1!c:t CkO 31 UULO (QYobor 1974)ìo :L13o b}iu ub)uo kit .iioii :roltpìun A,C;ivaL o: oo'i&ìooOu[ip::od wi;1 '10 IUtV() tyU::i oi'u cu iiar i 10 toka ibaLovor12 onoi t

90 O)UJ iu 41() h LeLdo.i 1c -eda o Li )owh E LJuiflfl CW JOt LOJu X1 OjtT, 1Iut 'O )OLO O joint ven-

tui'ort fiu1o; 1ri4 bn uc

91 1t1& OQ!LÇ1;Qo iu ;o.Lc IiL31.):çr ua gc)U u 10 tLon3.,ol t; ijh 1tt)) rtCk .riI .omo

1LU ' hJ .)1LL iry' X1J nid b2 i.1ii:OimO&i ba ± ud b uiot, ' i,r..«/ JLc) L.Lt,tfi úy Wcd by IAOo- i10 o L.etLo o baLuL, ai i:& &;;f, o1ihe ciih t Itudy of

'bei o c±ti z!th rtho u ii.jcd iv h, utl uvoLu,92 ovocL tiud t i&i o th ty umd uu.o 000tuof ?iuhory poduotu u1iotLd be od cu a LjO ot 10 o u .o uiuuioi of

1i Cothitoo ihio1 tiui2 .joL? uJr tliitj ijut Othû dol Lt'ouedwould bu btiuÏy u iLl 1uph th ttuu» o pooeii £Wdöiilxi f f iudiwtu obi i1u Jci )V tk i.iubjeb wa'intod

14

1i csi BI 9 CIL 01? FAC

Page 25: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

itß d.iaoussion at an early dMe under standard items of' the Coaunittees onda, such as the

fishery commodity situation and outloo1c.

93 As regards the agenda as a whole, the Committee agreed. that a certain deee of f3ci-bility hou1d be maintained in view of possible de lopmenta at the Uuited Nations Conferzceon the Law of the Sea, It therefore invited the DirectorGeneral and the Chairman of the

Coimnittee to bear this matter in mind.

ANY OTEiR WT1!

94 No other matter was raised,

DATE AND PLACE 0F ThE XT SESSIC

95 The Committee was informed that the Fourth 5esion of the United Nation@ Conference onthe Law of the Sea was scheduled to be held. in New York from 29 Naroli to 21 May 1976 and

that a decision regarding a Fifth Session in 1976 had been left to the Fourth Session, In

the cirownetances and bearing in mind. that the Council of FAO normally met in Ootober, the

Committee agreed. that its Eleventh Session should be tentatively scheduled for the end of

September 1976, and that the precise timing should be loft to the DirectorGeneral io decidein consultation with the Chairman of the Committee.

96 The Committee noted that tri accordance with Rule II-3 of it Ru1e of Pz'ooedwe, theEleventh Session would have to be held at the He.qwwters of FAO in Rome.

Page 26: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

!PLd1X A

S OF THE OOMITTEE

.na.

JA GHIREtLI1, J,I.0o,í: jero ba jador

inhda de la Repblioa Ar tPj dell'Esqui].ino 200185 Roma

En

:oir, A,G,Fix3' .eitant SeoretaryOpvions BranchPisheries DivisionDepartment of ioult'ure

Canberra A000T0 2604

DALL Dr, W0Heady Criitaoe Biolor GroupCow nwealth Soientiflo Indwtrial

Rocearoh Or niviion (CSIRO)Croula, Nw South Wales 2130

ladesh

SALAEITThDIN, LPinent Ropro entatire of .ladosh

to FAOEwb&iy of tho People'., Republic of

gladeshVia E Pe-trel].a 300198 Rome

LIST OF EATEZ AffD O]ERVS

- 16

NEIVA, G.S,ologo de Pesca

ketituto de PescaAv0 Bartolomeu de Guamao 192S toe, Sao Paulo

C

VERNON, G,C,DirectorInteziational !r me PolicyInteriational Fisheries and ÌE

DirectorateFisheriee and ins Servios5. Booth StreetOtt , Ontario K1A 0H3

HaRT, R,Advisor, International DevelopmentInternational arios and Narine

DirectorateFisheries and Marine ServiosDeprtaoni; of the 1!kivironmentOttaua, Ontario ¡(lA 0H3

Go

Special Advisor, FisheriesConadian International Development122 B3nk StreetOttawa, Ontario

WI tF Vivian F0Permanent Representative of to FAO

b ay of CanadaVia G.B, de' Rosai 2700161 Rome

R.A0

Advocdo ChileSUDEPEEdificio PescaPra XV de Novembre 4Rio c.s J siro, bara

Page 27: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

Cuba

WJ0I RNGEL R.flc-.nitro de ECOIQ1n81i-tuto Taciona3. d la PeoaEneevad4 de Potes y A1ta.rePuerQ Peque.rq

GQJ:.t ROJ.A JPi' EecretriQ

Pxe de Cuba aute l II0Vi dei NQn-bi Pioli 44/800197 Rora

c

NEQRD JPuit Secetyb7 Q' 'i131i'i3

16Copezbgen

tL 1'11ICX LiLaClii'iuwNoern ]ì'ìtherioe Cous61 Nubi zteL SbzeQtA1oxuncÙia

ÌWLt ]L DIN, ¿MCciLcknoil O .zati.oz fo

quat.o tOQW'OOU4 TVai'aT SixeotNacsr W1.yCatxo

EL 3WIF, Dr. R.,Gewi'u1 Dii'eotor 'oz k3uziou4O 1.ffaio0er1 Epti ibi.oii foi'

qiatic Reøow'oer4 Tarwa 2treitNaii' C.tyCIiiZTJ

17 -

USIN? I:.A.Ititute o? 'iherie and. 0oeanogriphy1Cred y

J?jnleij.d

1 'iir; t P.,IrpeiYO3?Minictry of £grioultiir and Foresti'ylil1itu1i 3A

00170 iimi 17j5r UM Fi'of V0aae ncl 1iiihery }teevott Institute

P0 260Pt1i].iu i00531 53

Fawe

D0QUT, LDii' ?Jw.-aUjoint de8 ptohee i'iti1ae8

L w (i'al I l m.riue chaO.e3 , Fowt oy75007 Pcrir

Gobia

XBB S0or.eí 0ioo'er,oi3 oj.00n

6 Nl.nc FoehoxoJw jul

rQD a.TIUì ei''ode. &iniury o Food., ALQu1tui'ood. 1ai'ei 'y

5300 om

(iio?OY1ALT CL

au oja.iwoo iez'zionauAubad.o Le thAnû pau.v ].'op.3

uoi).ew.XoVi L. Qi8UJ. 41D197 Rose

Page 28: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

Gv

DO1I, L.Dx'eotorNaUonal Fihory IupeotorateM5: r1ry of Agriculture d Food.K:t;'.: taajoe tr 11

9 zu r Ofce

OThl ihory Xncipcotoratety cl Arioultrne .ud Food

i-Ii Lajoa tr 11

i.x0Additional SecretarylVïirziL3try of AgricultureWw Doihi

Ir1c:AOUAONO, H0Dircotor of PlanningDirectorate- eral of FiherieeDep'tmont of Lii; icultureTal Slmba Raya 16J't iESI?iT HA1] A0

ernate Por eut Repreuentative ofInd.onei to FAO

lcr of Ind.oneeiVia Piemonte 12700187 Rome

Iran

OUIWI9 Dr. à.LAeeietant Director of ReeearohFiehertee Oompxky

darpihlL1vi

18 -

Ireland.

O'SULLIVAN, D.Ai.stnt SecretaryDopament of Agriculture nd. Fisheriee

Dublin 2

Israel

Ita

OLIVA, Dr. A.Directeur do 000ÇjonDirection gnOrle doe pechos maritimee!4iniet,re de la marine mare & deViale Aeta00144 Rome

P0RE:I, Dr. A0Direction zA5rale de la production

r1 colo

de l'-ioulture t forttsVia Settembre 2000187 Rome

SUDi9 Dr. A.Ooun@UorReoorch and Development Detït

1erio Agoncsy

Minietry of c&oulture and. Foreatry2-1 umigaekiCha-a Tokyo

SAlTO, T.Alternate Permanent Repre2entative

of Ja to FAOEmbaeBy of JapVia Viz'injo Oraini 1800192 Rome

SHflOIORA, LIntia-Uonal Affairc Divieion

ox'ie AcyIiniotry of Agriculture and Forestry2-1 KaìtekiChiyoda.ku, Tokyo

Page 29: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

IWNGIJ? D.0UAder-SecretaryMinietry o Touriem and WildlifePO Box 30027Nairobi

Lictcc of Fiuherie1her:LB puuont

MifliLt7 of !Jourjgim cd WildlifoBox 40241

Nairobi

1CODOCÇUb1iQ of)

LBE, 01azi-IiFilzerìe AttaokZEwbanEr of the Republic of KoreaVia Barnaba Oriani 3000197 Rome

Libian Arab abi,c

ZAFa, Son oellence L Maxime-Paoalbaeeadeur

Amba.eeade de la Rpubliquo Mal :eyVia R Zandonai 84/A00194 Rome

u

RAVMJOJAONAV I

Repreentant permrwnt adjointdu I agacer auprìe de la FAO

ubaaeade de la Republique )elagaeyVia R Zandonei 84/A00194 Rome

- 19 -

MOSKOVITS9 Dr, I.Permanent Repreaentative of Malta to FAO

baey of MaltaLungotevere Maralo 1200186 Rome

Netherlend

PftLIO, Dr A.00Head., Department of See and Coaatal

Mniotx'y of Agriculture and Pieheriele van den Bochetraet 4The e

LI0NRiS, H0Director o I1ericuMiniotry of Aeioulture, biimal Huebanthly

and Filex'teoPromibo, Surinam

OUNNINGRAN, B0T0DirectorFiuheriee Nan ment DtvteiouMinirtry of . icultiwe and iehez'ieaP,0, Box 2298Wellington

!iriaDADA, 30F0Acting DirectorFederal Department of FtaherieuP.M,BO 12529

SAETIRSDL, GDirectorMarine Reaeurch Inetitute of the

Directorate of FieherießNordneeperken 2Bergen

]3tGESBN 3r0, P.CouneellorMiniatry of Fioheriec0e lo-Dep

Malawi

ZUIWtA A,J.P0Pro ject Co-ManagerPromotion of Ixib rated. FiekLeriea DevelopmentPEO. Box 593Lïlongwe

Page 30: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

T

Bopr loc:y Co'e

:r 2 01QDpr

i!;JL LTJ J0/r :!.:r':L ;pi3Iìrm ? F.

cij Arri 22C :5 *K.

: FP2 Ltr!: c:oc2ivario y i1..tro

7c,jcucrJ.oOt9Q d Pfli1, 8nIiO la FAO

Va (L 530O9 ,:Q;r

:cv VIC DEpOcC) P1(C Adj u-to ckv10 :i '/io

1i 21QTQ cl Fa!flá e la FAOVia C 5300194

U £

(7 çj:, fn 'Lc5a y Eoon6nrLoa(':,O Ç()

(o r'ç 351

iOÏ.A, 4W1M') Dflop or ' o Poao dol

io .o iitT( dc. Pofk co la X?j\O

Ç(O015.

2O.

SI1J(.0 R A0Co jeoImhija& dici ?er ante la Santa SedeVia del M ohciio 7500193 Roiìa

SI'0 OAOEO

Coiocia]. aohLboy c.' the Rpublio of the PhtïippineVia di lTa].entino 12-1400197 flc:

Polid.

MâJ ])I' R0H0Sea Fìheric3 :íiituteAi Zjeotia 1Qdyia

South Viet-

Ronaîa

SamL. ¿c.bia

]AY0U Dr0 ¡LR.FiohoiocicuL1 orrch Centeruhddiyab, Jedi

AIP-9A.C9 50A0r!rinc Rccoiuo eoarc,herAiculiu.ral Reaoacb Center

yah9 JeddJth

Djrclf(Y,Y Or.J pO.eIno th ioioppomo z'waj.J3.,P0 289

Page 31: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

IWIUEL Y PINI, J.Director General do PeeC&

Direcciôn General de Pesca Z4arftimaRuiz de Laacän iMadrid

cOiiiaaz, R.Reprcsentante Permanente de Espaa

agie la FAODibajda de HeVia di Monte Briauzo 5600186 Ro

Sweden

HOLT, Dr. J.Director- .eralNational Board of FisheriesPackS--403 10 Gotbenburg

AUGUSTINSSON, L.Deputy Head of DiviaiozS eh International Develo t AuthorityS-105 25 Stoolthoira

L' ''UIST, Dr. A.Inatituto of Narine Rese oS-453 OOL i

Thailand

Puniaia

- 21 -

6Z[(1RK, Dr. A,Director-General of FisheriesGeneral Directorate of FisheriesMinistry of Aiculture

el caddesi 9Ankara

TENCI, K.Agricultural Counsellor and Alternato

Perm ont Representative of Turkey to FAO]abassy of the Republic of TurkeyVia Palestro 2800155 Rome

da

Unid ¿rab

AL THY, M,S,Director of FisheriesMinistry of Agriculture and FisheriesP.O. Box 1509Dubai

A.R.&sistant Director of Soil and WaterConoorvction

Ministry oi' iculture and FisheriesP.O. Box 1509Dubai

AGLIN, A.J,0's Special Representative on InternationalFisheries oíions

De ment of Arioulture d Fisheriesfor Scotl.d

le House3 . Y.aweon StrrotHdiubm'h 3, Scotland

STO , J.S.Fisheries AdviserMinistry of Overseas DevelopmentEl d HouseStag PlaceLondon SW1E 5DH, land

LA]YNORE, A.A,W,Permanent Representative of the UnitedIingdom to FAO

British 1!i syVia XX Sottabre 80/A00187 Rome

BERMEJO MARTINEZ, VJef0 5' 3eooi5n

feral do Pesca ft i!4jni;.erio de ComercioRui de Aaxc5n 1Madrid

Page 32: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

D0L

rc' 'TyJ; Izo ccrç j'» ro Scz'vlcc,

Oo:Lio oophoic

iLfl 1iLJ o OeoeoctYobo 98102

O?iCii Affairo' oçç

ni4 iiic AÑ.:çío coD000 20250

D0 JOAO!. ori crcñ for International

;3o Anc,mo1Jr:'o r'jr

c'

O OÇCOO i iç 20352

O

T'Y ç;çO ;fv

ç tn (oco of Oc an AffairsÇOL ï) 2O2O

CLJS I,

rurj Ipection d Safetyiiíco:\i,rì1 Iiic c±c Scvicc

Ocinççij o2fI AcpIwrio

UO3 oZ C000aYn:,or DCo 2023

I0iï)i, p0!)norO- i-

ìtoii £irtncc.Ù o:col DevolopeUi: C0 20523

Dciroco. oì'o li FAO1fL1bjc do iobï:.ei dol Ui'yï)a ''i: 101) :3

22

, B0 1arioflona?rc Pcrianente

do. woy cîc la FAObijc c' ìopiThlic dol Uruguayc

00198

Zai

i;i,r. )')

cpï': pt2 Ei12pp1&?At de laTh'. upr3 de la FAO

puh.icp.o du ZareVio. /o0018'! OO

O?I J.1BIR NATIONSOT kL1S OF THE COMITT

ThCThI T0Liic:ço Coocillox'

biade de lE Fu3publique algthidìocrtiuo c popu1ire

Vi di Vii.la R ..oti 20ooî6î Rose

U ZAT! tJNChir d f'aice a,i0 and Alter te

Poon Repro zi&vive ofo FAO

bccî o? Bw)1 Eolliii 20fl0 c?rr4O

Cou

TSILA, A,R,ConcoillorHii&n)o dcciBrno.lho

ublic of)

forets

Page 33: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

uinea Biseau

VIEIRA, H.Secrtaire gên6ra].Coøuissariat des connunioations et

transportcD.F. 306Biseau

Mexioo

RODR1UEZ, X.Agrc4o economico - Repx entaMe de

CONAUPOVialc Peteur 65-800144 Ro

ro

LAYACHI, D.Directeur g&iralOffice national des pohes13-15, rue Chevalier Ba cl

Casablanca

AZZOU, LDirect curInstitut dea p)oheeRue da Ti.znit

Cacablanca

C0.RI, B,

Directeur gnralSooit PRO4, rue ClemonouC ab].anca

Niger

NAJDA, I.Directeur des eaux et forhsMinietre do l'oonomie ruraleNiainoy

RUIVO, Dr. M.Secretary of State for Fisheries!ttnietGz'io EconOmiaPr y do ComercioLisbo i

CAÇAfl.S, Dr. R.DirectorInternational Fisheries Relations and

Cooperation Service aPr Duque da Terceira 24, 2Lisboa

DA CRUZ, Dr. M.Secretary to the Secretary of State

for FisheriesIinictrïo cia Economia

Pr a do ComercioLisboa i

Sr !

GOONEWRDENE, E G.Secretaryliuirbry of FisheriesP.O. L* 1707llo FoColombo

th S FROM Ne STATES

Union of Soviet Socialist Republics

LAPITSICI, Dr. V.G.Ministry of FisheriesRozhdestr Icy 12

Moscow

VOLODARS M.YMinistry of FisheriesRo estreneky 12Moscow

ø D'OGO I.ieur du CREP

Direction de l'environn ont

'do u

Venezuela

OLA {' R., H,L,Representante Alterno do Venezuela

ante la FAObajada de Vezuela

Vi1.e Bruno ; zzi 10900197 Roma

Page 34: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

REPI'ÂTIV$ 0F ¶ThNTIO13 W r-EcI x'i1

RI1 D', TESeior Thchical MvieorDivioioa i:'or Glob d. Iz

Pro jocto

United NtioioNew Yorl, L,T0 10017, U0S0A0

t rnGRIWT'N, R000Ao.u'Lt ocro(.iryoc7, P].00 do 000y75700 Podio, F

*Ab

i Coum ission

24

GUEST'

r0 D Loh.DirccorCc'a1

National X'ithorou 0u o. Morocco

L.f

or;:ï':v'r_c, F' j-'

EOOCnI ve1oMc

oLc,v:'L ¿diior13 WÌ0

2 :uç LJO3115T3 Fii Oodo i6 Fraico

0DS AL IZATIONS

Ooioi orO %Df ¡)onio lloriet3

t-o EC0MIC c0'UITY

0, Dr0Hocd, DiviGio.i of cu1tumDirocorato Ci-1 fcr D elo

Coor,xvio!CCE200, ru de la L01Ìr:ellee 1040,,

Covxec

d Liv stock 7 c o-ooyent d 75700 Yri. J1fl00

Page 35: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

- 25 -

DPYiG CONITT

L';i 'iDr.C' 3

ï:ï Ierica

i'rt Di ctorGi c.hie) Popp

jjc;j Op Kojima

Dizc1 hcy Rico&ùivi.iion H0 ahar

Diroor Fithry I trjc fi Winger

SECRTIRIAT

Scx'etry JEQ GLIOZ)L1 Officer

ikiriee)A1ct Sro'eay J ) ,L ficdornç»

$cioz 11c:f Liior Officer

Page 36: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

Mr C'; ; Di; :

thc

LDDRE DY TI1 DPthlY'ii owc

.00gLtod. íiy J -bo hoid k; .

afï.... c. coeiuiori. o othtí; nb1e yoi ..fc tI o± i):o ( '

L,'r o JT7 o1(' 'i12y Q Ó).D (o-ï', OTh ?.toirrß a c:i.0 n' iY5 OMJ. O cu 1211iL L. .

ho tii c:J; 'r: !tci tkiJ ¿) Ì(jQK fl

yow ConittoeYou tìouhtOto and.

ci'coo on;iot îom oh tocici ezt nowin N?r York t

vro I io iiht it i

;i , .. iì Ootob' iv h d'i1j irt on th3 United.Lt eoo o 4 ot thi Co'in.1tee' jo 'hcì Uorld D'ood.

i1ì ch 'iii: ccc'Tk c ïou I r; ponrñ.bility OÍ.AQri EzJ "ono OEtii1 VIry:

Le o rav n.. u'd.ci about t Wo1c1 Pood, this ubjoi. i not onO OU,..

f.. "ood OL?eonco .yfJ t kiopa in xcL j fight o e' i.u1.& 'L. c'c. Ct i)j, jO Qí'j Of lheiubo';!u iuuut i:u (JJX4,UÇ) O 1L() c i nt;''C!1iy

7AO '1:', k,U i U'(L), (O jIj UU[3'.z'jSj(, ' '!O oitiiczooof ';10 (JL'C+' :'; nL»MJ o. ' A!d.

MLi :o' ( tu , ' u oo ;o? ¿3 1OOr1j'j ' h o i' 'I . Lib t X; .0 : : it a'()!itu N.;iuu iuiLu huuu1 ['u . iç uuuny b' thc.

LJ , 'LiL:) U» ;oJO *'u policy-.n

'k'LJ tJi!C 'ooi! (J4j.,'(i:,'Lr;Lj Liuj!u uj'uuit' us.' 1?L'.) hu; 'h octtalo! '!u .Ld uJ!ct u ,u :;4 )%'c.Lauc)ci o.' uruiLLtb1u !i

d.Q'iîo:!4thk OO1.' '' :; LJ L hu Ltuu cx cio 4ilioiI)cO)J Q CtL y' Jt J !ÌI (IL! TL.s( .A O J. L'vi, ¿ (J '(St) (J oo L r bou

Oun' ¿o L ç c4y t'e ',.. 4ic , ti o. tic o ' u t i. t 4 wio o C!31Ci ± orfooc. Lu oin to oLit iCiLP L' thu 'o iu'th fc'ite o' pepu].ct.ton

x Lu thoo o.,v_itx'joo Mch cre ÏIÌOÍJ 'i bl to 'tho t1n'c:t oi' inforoeeen food.uhortceu dto o deo'occi crop ZcLlioo It io thnc u'ioi icï cre least c%ble tobiir hc4' out of rouIulo ?or i.tek of oou foroi ::o1»no o iIWert the food theynGOcL Thuc tho Gon.cronco c.ocicLod. the aoJJt iu'nt cci ur,r ;xa3 r3oluiou to the iorldfood. pi'ob1oi hou in ijoive jnorc,jjo iii .'ood rocuct:Lou ¿, cu'vo!opi,r oountrieo0 Itadopted. . nuobor oZ rouinlution co crnin cutx'ou doiw t' çojuçro thio and arrange-

for tuo uc1& itor erernci fi ,nc,icj. asoictanoc thn. 'rn'ntior txill need. to backup their oun efforts in achio'ri i

now, in ].!in' about food produoiou or food. dcd or foe- fgeu in developingoountrieo what people chiefly hayo in mmd cro ,aeio fcod? . .tiou1arly aine euchae ihot ed rieo BUt it io olecr thnt in a critio world ,'oc .tion like the pros-ont ie need to .......... every poeoibihity of increaein food . 'nd there te od

Page 37: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

27 -

reason to believe that fish, which today provides sosie 14 percent of the total direct urldconsunption of aniva1 protein, vt a siificantly creator contribution to the needsof developing countries than hitherto.

Your attention has ben drain to the resolutions of the Norid I"ood Conference thataffect fisheries in the introducion to the document on the Programme of Uork and Budgetwhich is before you0 Because of thiE J: shall not go into detail but I should inassing draw your attcuion to the face Iw.t one of the main resolutions of the Conference

calls on the gcverent of ch devoiopin country to accord a hier priority to ariou1.tur. id fisheries develop ; Apart from this I should like now to draw your attentionto t three main bodice the torld Food Confer ce docidd to establish0

The firet Je the WorJ uci1 bl10 v thr it erial or plonipotontirryiiîel j uotion a u c tho iJnitod Nci.tioníj o t1c nera]. eIJC1b1ytovh the Econoiiuio ect Socic. Couecil It i dooi ed to eerve as a coordinating secha-ni to povidc ovo li t ortod. c.nd continuin attention for the oceefu]. coordinationa1 follow-up of poUc:io oonorning food produotiou nux'ition foo n'ity food trade,and food nid, ae weil wi othe. related attero by aU the aencios of the United Nations

The Council will be holding its firt iwotiu iiore in Rouio at the end of this month,Its small secretariat is also here with us in FAO ncl th1 is to be welcomed as it willfacilitate the coordination of the work of FAO uith he activities of the World Food Council.These clearly must b complementary particularly s the Uorlcl Food Council is intsnded toserve as a coordinatth mocbanthm and. this autun the AO Conference will b ked to giveofficia]. recoition to this0 It trill be particulary importen, to a; :ee upon the spheresof competence of the Uor].cI Food Counc!i in rolation to the FAO Cowicil0 It is also proposed.tkat FAO bodies such as your Coi tte hould. be eblo to transmit their reports through theConforence or the FAO Counoil to the Uorld Food CounciL

The World Food Conference also r ested FAO together With IBR]) d UND? to or izea Consultative CEroup on Food Production ud Iavcstent in Developiug Countries to be com-posed of bilatetU nd s ltoral tO be safod jointly by FAO, ThRD and UND?,The Consulteivo Group is intended to oncoura'o i largor fLow of ettornal resources for food.production to improve coordination bet a iultilnteral and bilateral donors end to ensuremore effective use of available resotwo.

The World Food Conferenee also established. an International Fund for Agricultural Deve].-opment to finance ariculturc]. dovolopiont pro jecto primrilì for food products in the deve].-oping countrLos0 A]]. 1ovolopcd azd dovelopizig countries wore invited to contribute to theFund on a volunta'y boio

A meeting of oountrior intcirontod in the cotch],iohm;'b of the fund was hold at Ooova

on 5 sud 6 ?ay The ovornsozits or 66 cupvt,.o cud vviour intorgovornmowal orçini-tat&ons wore ropresontod ot the mootig Thera tías QC nupport ur the Ftnd and poeJ.tivostatements were mcdo nuibor of pstowtir]. ctri.butorr Ft ou ].007n as if tuo Th'nd.

will be orjt;bl&rihct nv1. v i'&t]. tc.z'got of 1 000 millio' pooi]. Th?cwin )ho for theeapii;a]. of the Fofld war :vou1ed aucL ppovtc(. by a rnsibor of potonti,l oontributox'n.

Uhilo the roolutionn r ntin tue o3tah].ir)Ient of those hodio are eonooivec ingeneral toríin, e].ov]. tho wn; cUod fQr tri.].]. cover f thorioo. In fact the Committonnay Wish to ta!o &vattago of the cUocuririionu uder itor 4 of its ¿oudc "Ooordinatio ofmultilateral eni bilateral asiotevoo to fishery dovolopeui; pro(rimiìo&' to avo a proliw-mary disouvoion fo dhiob ideas could emergo about the contribution, tLiat these now hadioncould make to fishoriori.

The follow.up of the t!erid Food Confereoo coubinod with other factors p2rticularlyincreased costs that the Director Cenerai rnrit ash tho Confereneo nest 1ovombor toauthorize a coníiidor&ßy lav;or huçot for tuo uiívion for ho OOLL biennium 1976/77.

Page 38: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

28

st proportioncte increase in fact come in the Agriculture Deparlment end. thisu dc d.b1c s hio ie where the rcoornendMiocj of the Uorld. Food Confer oe have

in cffcs0

For the Deprtinent of Fishcrioi the budget increase ouruts to about 20 percent0 I

s!li not . into detail here as you will be discussing this matter under item 6 of yourada The work o 1'A0 in the field of fisheries dur. 1976-77" and r0 Popper willinroduco the subject in some detail when you come to that it in your - da0 I should

pi like to au you that the wishes d decisions of your Committee have been tcount in prop2riug this rcame of tJork end *i;0

I shall be foliowin your work with interest p'ticuln'ly as I r lize the importanceo -m uroblci that face fishorer at a timo when these must contribute to inoreaaing the

ible supply of food throuhout the world0

I wish you every ccess in your work.

Page 39: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

Mr Chairman, Dalagatee Ladies - d Gn

First all I should like to thank the Director-Ceneral of' FAO for the honour lie has

me in ì' ng me to speah bforo -thin honourable seznbly. Wh a I received this invi-

tation I accepted it ruu'ly because I considered it my duty à in my interest to do so.

:tt was, indeed, duty to takc parth''bly--.in this meeting by prsting a note on"tile varioiii fiohory voloront nethod.o in 1orocao" to take p in the imfl

yovi. honourable Committee has boon mczin to promote fisheries in the wor:Ld. This vre mo

tile feeli of adding a stone to the building you are erootin.g

It was aleo in n interest to come and. tell 'ou how !oroeeo intends to develop herfisheries, to obtain wise col from you wo incontoetahie specialists in this

field.

Mr. Chai.

In the course of my report, I should li!o to ptt tile aoacnt, not on development methodsas such, which depend ou the pooific data of a country and the oniui of its people, but

u.bove all on the national offert on the one à anti bilateral, or multilateral cooperation

on the other need.ud for ob develo,ui in a country such u mine.

When Morocco d iclod that fieheries hou1d. piy a xlomiusnt rolo in tho national

economy, it f cod a probica that lioA to be tackled at tuo ,mpo"tent levels:

At the level of dignoriio end the p'000ription of remedios, which calls fortioular attention end tile çobiuod offoz'to of e. number of peoiaithts

29

At tilt level tment ubh, t be otve, uet ;o tute aocowt thepti t 's o d1.Uo;u cqxt aeninuoue

ly lyM.n tiuciic p1meo, raU try to vo yew ¿v e Jicrooce' e tien ou the

natica and h later'l or p3,i lcvnrel ples to er'ad tile rilery rocter

At tilo outsot, we vted tilO s Of in }orocue O& Qroui3ly epossibl.reuetn'eee, iehi,n nr c!uud motiluclI3, silero ntivbione, tile mimo population

its o niotiou, fish ooning nd proc n&n tnn, doioet:Lo ad 's* mJets,and zotiu methods,

I shall not go into the dotailr of this ne.lyrjio, but I nhould like to sap izo that

such a task took a long timo &u called fox' mui,y erterial end humen resources oh Morocco

could not mobilize on its aun.

The national effort that coe.'ited u ].y in prepa.'ing the ground end creating

a favourable atmosphere for uooeesfu1 i .lenentation of the 'dianowtio" phase. This phaserequired the effective collaboration of the maritime population to g.ther data for tiloanalysis.

Our role, therefore, us to tb pilgrim's staff and to start a drive of ].aziation

d to arouse awar ose among the people concerned. We contacted the maritime populationindirectly through the praos, radio or television end1 abovu all, directly in the course ofmeetings at the fiI3hik porte of .rocco, and at various lwels. u ad. you, Deloatee who

AppendiL O

M

ADDRESS FC IJR D. LAYA I DIRCTt-Gi i 0F Th.

NATIONAL FIS lES OFUOE OF I1OROCCO

Page 40: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

30

th ohoci u ;iov to bi.c ditioti ci kãc d teust of L canrii thr r.U. otct o. oii pi1i torl Ony OQOan oou:Ld do the job, ifou1y ocae o t : ;::

I havc c3ear the pbo o:tci c11u br intervention by ac Uootor ! ?ron tbe rutet we >'oud i covy to oi1iot irnatioua]. Go-

TtOn to obii t d q-ulity of pec.iits 1od,

cc iJ]jDP ':J. çj drew up t'rica dovelop2lont project in Norocco"¿cki 10 y

i 1i1; ti ubjcte of the project whioh acoem jod fisheries

Aporaieal

;nd economic structures in th

QdrnizatioU of fleIiig vcL and tech quei

Toohiwioy of fiah procein.g

Mr0 c 'we-n

t zZ UiW fo tho coflo uorab:o ejietcnco it he providedo'i ci to py tributo - i1e'iei "tent i general(. o:Q:- lt Lii iojuccL o oroeco for tho oopotonce u1 th uhioh they ae crying

r :h Jo I o would like to opreeo ît ii tion the orfeot reiont betweenlnto! e and. thc2 orocoen cou ortu oncd in the ar

(Yu .)WOò k!4t luL;2jCa ilL Iorocco wero otil]. of au nature ae totoheo and tho -ouio t».oc ub and m':otin o' roeourcoo Uoz'ovi' production

wa not di-ori iud :iod to moot hot cciando Ltly tho fisher.y eotor lackedthe coiipotont 'ooao1 i iablo Zor itE opiioa0

I ioi of tho rarjltu of alvi t:o tcotod. out a fivc..yoa plan with foraaia d]aiee in Ltioa to u actu.l ltution

Sjfjo mß. optizzi !1oitation e± ?:'eO11rOej

Dirreification of procLuotior to meet kot neods

o' :t iOn ithin M000co

Vo lO1 :L):(,

Ir (ba

Tbo vxiod of io bool' more t tu ;crc; and we launched the development p&eranor tth.iUi i tould !Lo to di.00io now, only i t 19'(3 won ur "aiional five-Ycax Devel-

opozt non" (1973-977) boGì0

r, : u out natio i d. biatora]. or »iultilateral action in

the plcmomtc5io1 o: thL pho0

The fir.. of c iioai. natva to uct up a 'utures needed for develop-ment. They Ll' itiva politici d economic

In the matter of a&thiatratlon, wo etabliohect be Natioï fi 1orio Office, a mj-public cjoyi Ziaancial autonomy nd adiniotorod by hoacled by the Prime

Page 41: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

Reor:'. sed the ritime profession byassociations and cooperatives

- 31 -

iuistez' and composed of all the )Ljnig,ier involved in the sector aud of' the various pro-fessional fishery associations., Its role is to propose to the Government or to take ymeasure that can promote the fihory sector, I-t is a kind of femiily doctor who prescribesthe cures, athninister the medicine if necessary, and constenily ichos over the hr..lthof: the ±'amily The composition of the Board of this Office shows you the importance woattaoli to fisheries0

In the political field, two series of measures were takencreation of an 'clusivefishing zone and Moroocaniation of the sector. In 1973, tiu uactended national jurisdictionover biological resources to 70 nauticol muco for better control and conservation of xe-souvt.es. 1owise, wo reserved f'iskt& rihis to vessels flying the Moroccan flag orn:d by Moroc.:. ind.vidvsl or legal .tities. 4Xtd by Moroc4 lsga3. entities wo meanany Moroccan aoimpc.ny in which at i t 50 perot of the capital cois from national publicor private sources.

On the other 1und., tic duaridod. IJbroocenizaiiou of the aeotox'0 In point of fact, theanalysis just mentioned. showed. that uhilo Iorocosnitatien eiiountod to 99 percent of produc.-tien, ii only 25 pcent iii pr000ssin (oasnint, f eesin, fiohmeal). Thia eituMionwa not in line with the spix'ations of the I4oroccan poopic end. bho objectives of: thoGovernment. Mox'ooconittion nudc it coopuloory .Z'or ll iitiu companies or those to beset up in the sector thCt t lo 50 percent of: their cpitc1 nhoulcl be held by orocoanindividuals ox' oorpoato bod.ioe

In the economic field., foin' ½in wore promulated io írtimu].ate fisheries:

The first i lied. "IoEc Code", provides for the followixi facilities fór newship owners:

A non-rc yabi of 15 to 30 percent on the value of invesimonts

The possibility of sx'itinj off twice the no vate, which in practice wexception from profit ia.

]xomption freD' tou charß'e end duties

R. duotion o' 2 : *uciion feos

The second 1aT rA fox' medi d. loniterm ox' a a reduced interert rates ofabout 5 percent per

Thu third lau oomtu froi pof:ii cs i orts of the fishery eJector-freeh, froson &nd. cnaet1 h,&dL fio1 ioel.,

Untier tho fourth l i', ooit invosiox' who inai naiiy cuje the vae X hvojust listed., io ntitid. it, iisfo v-id.en&i and. to rieto hi c.pital on th. eeostionof his activiticu in

Those -zoro the fiuì utopi ai naiionnl level d.csiod, uu I have ab.ead3 said., io es-tablish the uirutrin'ou, aiimeiciio vimont and ivo confid.onoo to foroii oapiiai

The u000nd ; tio effort u aimed. ai promoting aiti fiøherius. To improve its

productivity, we

cour ng the creation f professional

Supplied 1]. ship owners urith material aid to improve the equi. ont of theirvessels and. to introduce usw fishing methods

Page 42: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

- 32 -

::ucct r1i facilitios in por'ti

tJ.'d f iac to eior n fi.obin nrea, catch other species, and improvefish hL: ax'. brd

Thirdly, tI t1cna.i cffqr% the sîon and eii of huh within Noz'oocoIr fo1 IIorooeo otìzl oii 28 pr person d per rv, or 14 percunt of' its flehproduo'ion. Eh t1y by i ijb populction ion th .tiantio ud Nitreanooac W.th the oí oo.0 blanoe of il'u pop la.ou, oh ligh'teung thepri on tt i Qtcçi M ci c:Vi.ì d mestc fith erket to protect hisheriee from

hzs lunohed . bi trivo to Introduce fish into thefo L':bits of rocc We hwe set uo a oonpr to carry hiuh under the beetyieM cQ2dittone an acp1y c p ribl to the rijcrtost populviun on the borders ofze 'ot i c3o rcc ' o ço 'nN the Uc.l of idnu lc-.soalc ope t.on, he firetntt of trhic ar

Cha nwn, 'c r.ro i: f thO CtiQZ5 ¿at fltion.]. ievc. ï 7QU]4 not like 1QthOu aid 'h your periion nou oi: to da3. tith the bii-.

te1 c.r muit.la'ev c'o' 11çx bv Uuvooco o px'ospoct of' eiccssix deviopin fiuhorier Hore again X sll ono ouiy oo tep whioh ei to me theTuoSt important ¿nd dc.vo one. foi' development

cìentific r.:c::'c1. o flrt Í'i?ld in woh orocco needed id to expand thef'iehory sector Fr: the oLtF3o'1 , io felt thwt wo coid ot hope 'to uucoeed i'th a develop.-morii on ' t control of resources act , ?.nj end proc,ess.ng technology0

the resources, a qial'ttive and quan'i'tative ev.Luation

At iox' 'oc1ioloy the most appropriate methods for the cisting resourcee hado h tLio. . itht dop'tod by 'the fiuherrnen

ox' :):<'oouoL t aLti e'o to study, e riaient and then apply ew methods 'to the in-dr 'L L

acic1. olp frori U»P sid tcichn.cal awLst ce fr F!O, which I ve eadyhv riot up ox' uto-thowxL biological, bioc Lol, ooioraphio and tech-.

L I bortox' .oi ihcx o io . ixperbu and. Noeecan oointerparts ore working to' A ic i',fL :oe.rc wcrioL uupp.ies the rosccohers with d&'tc ¿ notable point

tcu o noul opertu are workinr au 01000 touch 11h 'the maritime:t:o uì)), iio hc'tation, now bcndci botter tizo bufi'ti it derivosz»

¿i u c c' uii 'our we ow 1210w 'the cex'd.io p'tonti'.L o oi.0 wtors,1çiu 'orJfl%) whiob trtuc1Y4r up'ij Wo O flOW

Í" 'U ulQy C'1t jfo iLl dit'tt. 'the J.Lt10d.11OtiOfl 0 PO1' UXdLdty '3j tui OC'i'i ±ilJhOr1iCZl

L4)Ì, 'AßUOULilI 't huu1oy, wo tiro ic* i4wrì':Lclobl3 'to wothzoo smoked fish,y:;.o u wU ¿.*i doí ad oat toed., and in 'to divc'cify their outpwt

iieooxxd 'typc cit' a cilsianos to wizioh Lorooco z)ux'so LiavOlVee libe establish-.4ont o tii uzUurtri firthorioo uì the oomtr'0 Y1')r0000 h' h-jirod auch cooperc'tion,

bw Llov;h' .., iz.i 1tpCLiOd ±'or at intertionl (Jtini, s roferrea to it onpol'thu of Thu Y.ux vcnnin 'the .nhery sooto

iuu ti.o Li oo'tin' 'the sxolusivo fiiç eni lay, cto L Lwticilo

Page 43: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

Lt firet9 ooaoidoring the tentali y of' the tu'oon. fìehi.ng ceriity wo proccodocl bytepo like a doctor who .ppiico a treatient adv'.ir o oc not to dieturb the pvione

p1iyeioioica]. cçirium0 Thue, the firet joint ingo oroaed by w wore concoivodin ouch a way thcv thoy id not givo the iioproeou ei' aopotiní with artir.ouai Zice1.»t on the contrary of 1oi a training colicol fr In the pooio oavtt fiehi;

nd the mothodn of fiohin pr000rvation9 proonnain9 end i' oont thocic ccpaiioehave ronowcd ort; i-al i'irJXiorotJQ roa oto't o onnoeAcv;od owno,00 With the í1meut and nn000ni of ;beno o uioo and finhoan I-7ith the xp) oita on of r000ureoo

In the oc'nO. ntaçn9 we nt np joint iorpr:,nori h noin(' p Vate ortXK) çp. r'Ll. j- ;),í do* ç'n op.rrnn tvo te

crvLcï n nnctí; tc oçoo id 1Iw rrn;':Qr or cinontobet oe MQO í:r.pitr, or ntv;;o) :oiii : mti ne9 they nro

otouor 'YV,On (ÏWÇ h i'ooyi t;i0 'rhO orcip JTt('í. CÇ tIO O VCVQ pO.OQI1or o. etato, ;hc 000 n-ror 'v 10 '. vn.';û TKrnQ or boìh0 Anor joInt ontorproon rncx ' 'ntooetce oovn ie Loc'rn oi'.y cc

op9.trl

Foilcw.1w orn,.cn ci ow rii4n ronn F'ench inrnr- piavn, whicho1rainod psrt o. :olr nup.:.nn by 1ïin in ovr voru ov1. tco.'îno riho rmatericl0 Tho tw co on concluded nu 7or of acowpy (florcicoan 3trvn O occnt Cs £?oueh .rIvao roup ¿C p9roout) 'o oorato oc'rdUiofr000r veeoo.r Úìi.ch hey o artdrQdl in the inticl o.Tç vhe coipnj cup1'lioe ]ionohp.lante with s içantit; o $rocn ocrdinee In on rcoo hni opcuod up on cddi.tiona].pot.irjibili'T of cliJ n' YIo.'oacau caunod fich on Proo1i ar1:ot

1rancc torotod A cnei'iu euppUoe of rai , torni for 1or plantee Jo worenot o'î in ocorrj an uitiw9rï w10 but aine in ie-ia ow ino :oru

lation an m'plo o. cnuo f ehorioc with fr000r vnnoio which on ioncxqiloit no 'otionaî f:nh& 'oundc and roviUo pmnntu i. Lh ou.ay' rnppiiooOffC'Qt of tb&F) :ri aircdy boina frìit in M000co bocavo a u1or o omtonore 1sg' docì«o to acui.ro pç'c1,-no froocn boato o rvold ; o crnpplioriinvolved in t.cnal i.eho:.ìoo

- 33 -

Sovereiity of' the Moroccan St&e covere all biological rcaoux'cee in the watorooluon of tbio ono The eeroioo of fiehing rit io excluiiveiy roorved Iiithio sono to veooie flying the Moroccan flag or managed by NoroocEn individualor le]; entitio

"These pro iciono do not stand in the ay of the prinoiplo of international cc-operatiot o hioh Morocco eubcDibee Without prejudice to Ito overei righttnd in :op'ot it national itoeet "

»oWi the lcw caUca "L:: - .'.t Code" çanto t: ìe adv to Noroccan cap-d £orei capitaL

Ltly theTe je a pcific law oing that a orei inyector tr referddr aci export capital thon ho cives up hie bueìnee0

Q Chairr: I a glad o tc favourable echo Ioroccoe appl h hd in friendlycomponîee of fried1y oolmtrieuQ l OTOQOY Corn)a11iOe With inxd

hav. Lí 'ounâed in Morocco in the pat tL , and I iìtcid to tell youbzt, ly rbout tht

Ow.' P the compny ;:uoc ic o;yond the tor(,iot cot in tiLOiC r- to ìuiid a pleut .ri:)ly the 'ranoh ì'hot toothcr

i chociid like to deocribe the epiritevolved euboequoutly

Bu.t before p'' &ou tba joint enterngoverned th ir biiì: od ow tbiu

Page 44: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

34

Such cooperation bsed. at first on núodia,te inter ts beoome a true mt:: ation of in...rete which may be regarded as a first step toward what is called "transfer of teolmolor".

Under a &*gcx;s between Moroccan and forei' capital, enterprises bave been setup in Mcco in t.b t They soiate Moroocano with Spaniards, Koreans,Japanese, Italians, Portugtiese, etc0

The scope of their activities varies They range from simple fishing or processingenterprises to iated undertthxig comprising produotion, processing and marketing0In L;hi type of cooperation, in I:ion to the financial and economic interests for eachof -t1 partners, )orocco benøfjt from the contribution of teohnolog, personnel trainingana. the str gthening of the traditional Moroccan fleet by more modern units,

Nrc, Ch3irinan,

f I have e no mention ei training, which calls even moro for international cooper-atori it jO . beenuso I have fr'gotten it but because it is a very recent activity whichhae not yet provided oufficioztt ezperieuoe.

ML'O Obairman

I am gi to bave been able to give you a brief description of th first a iires takento develop the fishery sector0 We are a e that much Tc n to be done so thai this sectorcan play its proper role in the national eoonoay0 We airo convinced. that to attain this goalwe must above all rely on ouroeivos0 But we also be1es in international cooperation0 Andwhile we do not hold out oin baud to beg for such cooperation, we do Qp : our arms to alli;hos who, like us, are oon.fidon-t that it n es it possible to fill the p between developedec d.ovoloping countries d that it contributes to bringing peoples together0

Page 45: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

i Opening of the eeeeion

2 Adoption of the agenda id arran

3 International aepeotri of fishery

The precent otate of the world fishery resources

Fishery cowc UNi ituvbion and outloolc

(C) Aetivitlee of r onal fishery bodieu

(d) Review of the status t d cou.sition of the FisheryCoi'jtt for the tern C tral At t 'tic (CEOAF)

4 Coordination of multilateral and. bilateral assistance to fisherydevelopmcnt progrt,mn ou

Probl t of inland fish ios

- 35 -

DA

10 Any other tters

11 Date and place of the n asion

12 Adaption of the report

Appendix D

5

6 The worh of FAO in the field of fisheries during 1976-77 (regulard. field activities)

7 Cooperation in the United Nations r:'yot in relation to firsheri

Unitod. Natiot Conference on the Law of the Sea

Relations tdth other Unit Nations or zationa

8 Matters considered by the Council of FAO

da of the Eloventh Session of the9 Su oct oc1. jon itoru for the ft t

Cot.iitteo 0E Fis onus

ftente for the session

& t fteut and d.ovelopiuent

Page 46: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

lix E

Proviionlotat p'oviional agenda

Proth3iol ab1t

Review o; ttc of ploitation of the world fiBh z'eeom'ceu

8ituaiion and outlook

LISTOFDO ì,

6 Proye c1 problex of reiona3. fihar bode

7 Review of the etatus nd eo ition o' he ihery Committeefor th ern Ctr]. 1.ti (CCAP)

B Coordin.o of ltilatexQJ. bilateral aeeiatance to fish-cry devoloent proixie

9 Problems of inland fieberies

10 The experience of tho Europus Inlend. Fisheries Advisory Com-mission (EIFAC) in monitoring inland fishery resources

11 Pro ie of wor1 of FAO in the field o± fisheries during1976-77 (r gLzlar end field activities)

12 United Nations Conter ce on the Law of the ea

13 Rcliouo ritb other United Natio& orni tions13, Supl

14 Iatters eozcictered by the Council of FAO

14

15 iet,od major itozi for the da of the 1leventh Sessionof the Couittco on isberies

16 Report o th ftin Group appointed. by tho Couîttee onIihorioo o 6 Juno 1975 to forwulavto enendiuente to thexire.ph of resolut io r.Oi/i /1 relating to the t ai'

oforonoo cnd oiitLon o he Sub-Coittoo on the Devol-..opment of Coopoz'i'4on h Xortioxa:L iationeConoerod rith 9.norien

COFI/75/ 1 Litt o do oxt

2 f0: :

3 o, t i'i'o citti0)CL Prk rour.1 nhmr hocUo

36 -

COFI/75/1

2

3

4

5

Page 47: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

- 37

COFI/75/1nf14 FiEh produotion end protection in iri].Cind. end. eetw.rinewaters of Europe

5 The role of EIFAC in reletion to water quality control

6 Outline for the r3bape of the FrogrwBwe of Work and. Budgetfor 1976-1977 (extracte)

7, Rev.1 Lint of dolegatee end. obervore

8 Addreao by the Quoet Speaker jJ

In French only

Page 48: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted
Page 49: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted
Page 50: COMMI EE ON FISHERIES · 2011. 7. 25. · TRB R QU]IG ATTENTC)N B TTh COUNCIL AQ LTJE IIUR DEC Z ION L MAtS FOR R1UTJDN rThs eseint stats of to i.uhcx' OQUXC5e Th Comnittee noted

MR/H 1646/E/975/1/1 100