Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Bachelor-Thesis
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
Presented to and supervised by
Prof. Dr. Karsten Leibold
International University of Applied Sciences Bad Honnef · Bonn
Department of Aviation Management
Jürgen Willems
Jülicher Ring 71
52388 Nörvenich
Germany
E-mail: [email protected]
Student ID: 9031666
Nörvenich, 14 August 2006
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Prof. Dr. Karsten Leibold, my thesis supervisor, for many
hours of helpful guidance and advice. He introduced me to the topic and helped
me with formulating many of the ideas and concepts. Furthermore, his interesting
lectures provided me with the basic skills to conduct the necessary research.
Many thanks to Prof. Dr.-Ing. Ulrich Desel for being a great advisor and supporting
me during my work on this thesis.
My special thanks goes to Mister Reiner Eismann, Managing Director of
Essen/Mühlheim Airport, for his generous support and for providing me with a
great research opportunity.
I gratefully acknowledge the support of the following persons, who contributed
their time to share their experiences and insights with me and provided me with
further information sources. I truly enjoyed the discussions and I hope that I have
accurately reflected their thinking in this thesis.
Wolfgang Vautz, Manager/Owner, VHM Flight Training and Charter
Uwe Marx, Flight Operations Manager/Pilot, VHM Flight Training and Charter
Guido Harling, Manager, BearingPoint GmbH
I would also like to give a special thanks to Norman, for the excellent and
productive cooperation throughout the last three years and the valuable support
for this thesis.
Finally, I would like to thank my wife, Beate, for providing me the necessary
freedom to conduct my studies, and my kids, Merle and Jan, for providing me with
as much distraction as was necessary to keep my perspective. I more than
appreciate the unconditional love and support they give me throughout my
endeavours.
ii
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
Table of Contents
List of Abbreviations ................................................................................................v
List of Figures and Tables .................................................................................... viii
List of Appendices .................................................................................................. ix
Abstract ...................................................................................................................x
1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Motivation................................................................................................. 1
1.2 Why Commercial Business Aviation?....................................................... 1
1.3 Structure and Purpose of this Thesis ....................................................... 2
2 Business Aviation in Germany ........................................................................ 4
2.1 The Business Travel Market .................................................................... 4
2.2 Business Aviation..................................................................................... 6
2.3 Regulatory Framework............................................................................. 7
2.4 Commercial Business Aviation................................................................. 8
2.4.1 Customer Contracts .......................................................................... 8
2.4.2 Pricing Structure .............................................................................. 9
2.5 Business Aviation Aircraft ........................................................................ 9
2.5.1 Common Aircraft Categories............................................................. 9
2.5.1.1 Multi Piston Aircraft ..................................................................... 10
2.5.1.2 Turboprops .................................................................................. 11
2.5.1.3 Executive Jets ............................................................................. 12
2.5.2 Very Light Jets – A Revolutionary Innovation?................................ 13
2.6 Benefits of Business Aviation................................................................. 14
2.6.1 Personnel Time Savings ................................................................. 15
2.6.2 Increased En Route Productivity..................................................... 15
2.6.3 Choice of airport.............................................................................. 18
2.6.4 Operational Flexibility...................................................................... 19
2.6.5 Improved Employee Morale and Loyalty......................................... 19
3 Finding the Niche Markets............................................................................. 21
3.1 Business Intelligence ............................................................................. 21
3.2 Methodology .......................................................................................... 22
3.2.1 Availability of Data .......................................................................... 24
3.2.2 Analysis Tools................................................................................. 25
iii
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
3.2.3 Data Validity and Integrity ............................................................... 25
3.2.4 Creation of a Master Data File ........................................................ 26
3.3 Evaluation of Intra-European Airline Connections.................................. 27
3.3.1 Direct Connections.......................................................................... 27
3.3.2 One-Stop Connections.................................................................... 28
3.3.3 Two-Stop Connections.................................................................... 29
3.4 Airline Schedule Evaluation Results....................................................... 30
4 Cost-Benefit Analysis .................................................................................... 33
4.1 Accounting and Economic Principles ..................................................... 33
4.2 Methodology .......................................................................................... 34
4.3 The Value of Time.................................................................................. 34
4.3.1 The Value per Man-Hour (VMH) Concept....................................... 35
4.3.2 Productivity Valuation Models......................................................... 36
4.4 Time and Cost Calculations ................................................................... 38
4.4.1 Time Calculation ............................................................................. 39
4.4.2 Cost Calculation.............................................................................. 43
5 Sample Route Calculations ........................................................................... 47
5.1 Selected Sample Destinations ............................................................... 47
5.2 Basic Assumptions................................................................................. 49
5.3 Route 1: Oulu, Finland ........................................................................... 50
5.4 Route 2: Vilnius, Lithuania ..................................................................... 54
5.5 Route 3: Katowice, Poland..................................................................... 58
5.6 What Type of Business Aircraft to Choose?........................................... 62
6 Conclusion .................................................................................................... 64
References ........................................................................................................... 67
Appendices........................................................................................................... 71
iv
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
List of Abbreviations
A/C Aircraft
ADV Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher Verkehrsflughäfen
APG (Seabury) Airline Planning Group
ATC Air Traffic Control
BEW Basic Empty Weight
BG Bulgaria
BI Business Intelligence
BRE Bremen Airport
BUD Budapest – Ferihegy Airport
CGN Cologne/Bonn Airport
CZ Czech Republic
DE Germany
DST Daylight Saving Time
DTM Dortmund Airport
DUS Düsseldorf International Airport
FI Finland
FRA Frankfurt Airport
ft feet
GDN Gdansk – Lech Walesa Airport
HAJ Hanover Airport
HAM Hamburg Airport
HEL Helsinki – Vantaa Airport
HRA Human Resource Accounting
HRM Human Resource Management
HU Hungary
IATA International Air Transport Association
IBAC International Business Aviation Council Ltd.
ICAO International Civil Aviation Organisation
IFR Instrument Flight Rules
ITIN VI Itinerary Variation Identifier
JAA Joint Aviation Authorities
JAR Joint Aviation Requirements
v
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
kg kilogrammes
km kilometers
km/h kilometers per hour
KPI Key Performance Indicator
KRK Krakow – John Paul II International Airport
kts knots (nautical miles per hour)
KTW Katowice International Airport
lbs pounds
lcl Local Time
LV Latvia
m meters
MCT Minimum Connecting Time
MDF Master Data File
MTOW Maximum Take-Off Weight
MUC Munich International Airport
NBAA National Business Aviation Association, Inc.
nm nautical miles
NO Norway
OSL Oslo – Gardermoen Airport
OSR Ostrava International Airport
OTP Bucharest – Henri Coanda International Airport
OUL Oulu Airport
O&D Origin and Destination
Pax Passengers
PCD Personnel Cost Difference
PL Poland
PPR Prior Permission Required
PRG Prague – Ruzyne Airport
RIX Riga International Airport
RO Romania
SAS Statistical Analysis System Software
SOF Sofia International Airport
SQL Structured Query Language
SSIM Standard Schedules Information Manual
vi
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
STA Scheduled Time of Arrival
STD Scheduled Time of Departure
STR Stuttgart Airport
SXF Berlin – Schönefeld Airport
TEC Total Explicit Cost
THF Berlin – Tempelhof Airport
TP Turboprop
TRF Sandefjord – Torp Airport
TTC Total Trip Cost
TVT Total Valued Time
TXL Berlin – Tegel Airport
UTC Coordinated Universal Time
VAR Varna International Airport
VDR Verband Deutsches Reiesemanagement e.V.
VLJ Very Light Jet
VMH Value per Man-Hour
VMHBE Average Break-Even VMH
VNO Vilnius International Airport
WAW Warsaw – Frederic Chopin Airport
vii
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
List of Figures and Tables
Figure 2.1: Distribution of Business Trips per Destination Region (2003 -2004) .... 4
Figure 2.2: Split of Total Business Travel Cost (2004) by Cost Sectors ................. 5
Figure 2.3: Usage of time aboard aircraft ............................................................. 17
Figure 2.4: Passenger Productivity Aboard Aircraft Where FIVE Represents a
Typical Office Hour........................................................................................ 17
Figure 3.1: Creation of One-Stop Connections with SAS ..................................... 28
Figure 3.2: Creation of Two-Stop Connections with SAS ..................................... 29
Figure 5.1: Average Break-Even VMH Values (Oulu, Finland)............................. 53
Figure 5.2: Average Break-Even VMH Values (Vilnius, Lithuania) ....................... 57
Figure 5.3: Average Break-Even VMH Values (Katowice, Poland) ...................... 61
Figure 5.4: Average Break-Even VMH for Choice between Business A/C Types 62
Table 2.1: Classification of Executive Jets ........................................................... 12
Table 3.1: SSIM Date - European Airline Schedule 2005..................................... 24
Table 3.2: APGDAT - European Airline Schedule May 2006 ............................... 24
Table 3.3: “There-and-Back-in-a-Day” options from the Rhine-Ruhr Area ........... 31
Table 4.1: Multipliers of Base Salary Resulting From Application of Methods of
Computing Corporate Values of Employees For Typical Corporations ......... 36
Table 4.2: The Value of Executive Time............................................................... 37
Table 4.3: Time Calculation Table ....................................................................... 39
Table 4.4: En Route Productivity and Total Valued Time ..................................... 41
Table 4.5: Cost Calculation Table ........................................................................ 43
Table 5.1: Time Comparison Route 1 (Oulu, Finland) .......................................... 51
Table 5.2: Cost Comparison Airline vs. Business TP: Oulu, Finland (3 pax) ........ 52
Table 5.3: Cost Comparison Airline vs. Business Jet: Oulu, Finland (3 pax)........ 52
Table 5.4: Time Comparison Route 2 (Vilnius, Lithuania) .................................... 55
Table 5.5: Cost Comparison Airline vs. Business TP: Vilnius, Lithuania (3 pax) .. 56
Table 5.6: Cost Comparison Airline vs. Business Jet: Vilnius, Lithuania (3 pax) .. 56
Table 5.7: Time Comparison Route 3 (Katowice, Poland).................................... 59
Table 5.8: Cost Comparison Airline vs. Business TP: Katowice, Poland (3 pax).. 60
Table 5.9: Cost Comparison Airline vs. Business Jet: Katowice, Poland (3 pax) . 60
viii
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
List of Appendices
Appendix 1: Commercial Air Charter Companies in Germany
Appendix 2: Air Charter Brokers in Germany
Appendix 3: Listing of German Airports
Appendix 4: “There-and-back-in-a-day” Options
Appendix 5: Airline Bookings for Sample Routes
ix
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
Abstract
The purpose of this thesis is to assess the potential impact of commercial
business aviation on business companies in Germany. In other countries,
especially in the United States, business aviation is accepted as a normal
business tool that can contribute to the profitability of the company. In Germany,
business aircraft are still afflicted with an image of luxury, and many right-sized
and cost-conscious companies do not want to be associated with such
extravagant expenses. It seems to be mainly a question of perception or
nescience, why many German companies avoid contact with business aviation.
Another possibility may be the way in which travel expenses are actually
calculated. The benefits that can result from the use of a business aircraft are
basically the same, no matter where the company is based. A difference obviously
exists in the quantitative effect these benefits may have on the individual company
budget. This again depends more on size and nature of the company than on
nationality.
This thesis will give an overview of the main benefits and advantages that are
unique to business aviation. On the other hand, deficiencies in scheduled airline
services will be highlighted. The potential time and productivity gains that can be
achieved by using commercial air charter are quantified and a model is created to
evaluate the tangible benefits on an individual trip basis and in comparison to
scheduled airline travel. The created model is applied to three business trips,
based on a set scenario. The results clearly demonstrate the existing potential on
the German market. However, honouring these benefits requires a comprehensive
valuation of employee time. Especially in Germany, personnel is a major cost
factor, not only in the service industries. Companies must recognize these costs,
when calculating the full amount of travel expenses incurred. The created cost-
benefit evaluation model provides a simple means to demonstrate that business
aviation can be a valuable complement to scheduled airline travel.
x
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
1 Introduction
1.1 Motivation
In today’s economy, the growing globalisation of corporate activity has created the
need to establish and maintain long-distance customer and company contacts.
Despite modern communications technology, the need for business travel is still
increasing. While phone, fax, video conferencing or email obviously are ideal
under many circumstances, personal presence is often essential. When physically
being there, the amount and quality of information that can be gathered or
delivered face-to-face exceeds that of any other communication method. As being
there obviously requires getting there (and back), time and cost efficient means of
transportation are required.
Scheduled airline services can provide a valuable tool to perform this task.
However, these services have undergone considerable changes throughout the
last decade. Increased competition and fierce cost pressure caused by the
liberalization of the aviation market forced many of the established airlines to right-
size their operations.1 Hub networks were streamlined and services to and
between smaller cities were reduced. Conversely, business continues to expand
from large metropolitan areas to smaller cities. As this thesis will show in Chapter
3, there are obvious disparities in airline supply and individual business demand.
These disparities are an opportunity for alternative transport solutions, like
commercial business aviation.
1.2 Why Commercial Business Aviation?
Business Aviation, in general, is a flexible and useful business tool that can yield
tangible benefits to the user. A study conducted in the United States found
business aircraft operating organisations earned 146% more in cumulative returns
than non-business aircraft operators. Furthermore, on a return to shareholder
basis, business aircraft operators returned 343% to their shareholders between
1 See: Focus (2003). p. 15 et seq.
1
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
1996 and 1999 versus 177% for non-operators.2 Some companies in Germany
have realized this potential by operating own corporate fleets or by using the on-
demand service of commercial business charter companies. Yet, the general
acceptance seems to be rather low. Business aviation is still widely perceived as
being an expensive luxury item that goes beyond the scope of commonly tight
travel budgets.
The results of this thesis are directed towards those companies that still rely on
“traditional” means of air transport. As the operation of own corporate aircraft
requires major investments and already existing knowledge of the business,
emphasis will be placed on the commercial side of business aviation, because
there are no commitments associated with on-demand charter.
1.3 Structure and Purpose of this Thesis
In Chapter 2, this thesis will examine the business aviation market and outline the
existing framework for the air charter business. This chapter will also provide a
qualitative description of the most important benefits and advantages of business
aviation compared to scheduled airline travel.
In Chapter 3, it will then go on and look closely at the European airline schedules.
The chapter will outline the disparities between scheduled airline services and
business travellers’ needs for a set scenario.
Chapter 4 will draw on Chapters 2 and 3 to quantify the elaborated benefits and
develop a generic model that can be used to evaluate on an individual trip basis,
whether or not the use of a chartered business aircraft is economically favourable.
In Chapter 5 the generic model will be applied to three selected sample routes to
demonstrate the possible financial benefits.
2 See: Arthur Andersen LLP (2001). p. 3.
2
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
The reader of this thesis will obtain an understanding of the peculiarities of
business aviation and the potential cost saving opportunities resulting from its use.
The findings may be used to convince companies that still rely on “traditional”
transport modes to approach commercial business aviation without bias.
Eventually, this may further encourage the use of general aviation aircraft for
business travel.
3
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
2 Business Aviation in Germany
2.1 The Business Travel Market
Business Travel
Business travel in the sense of this thesis is travel for a purpose and to a
destination determined by a business company. Incurred travel costs are covered
by that company.
According to a business travel analysis conducted by the VDR (Verband
Deutsches Reiesemanagement e.V.) in cooperation with BearingPoint, German
business companies with more than ten employees performed more than 146
million business trips in the year 2004.3 With regard to preferred destination
regions, Figure 2.1 shows that the majority of business trips were domestic. While
domestic and European business travel activity increased from 2003 to 2004,
travel to intercontinental destinations declined to only 50% of intra-European travel
activity.
Figure 2.1: Distribution of Business Trips per Destination Region (2003 -2004)4
104.75
24.4918.17
106.63
26.49
13.240
20
40
60
80
100
120
2003 2004 Domestic
2003 2004 Europe
2003 2004 Intercontinental
million
3 See: Verband Deutsches Reisemanagement e.V. (2005). p. 6. 4 Source: Adapted from Verband Deutsches Reisemanagement e.V. (2005). p. 7.
4
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
Business Travel is a high value market, not only for the air transport sector, but
also for public and private ground transport providers and other service industries
(e.g. hotels and restaurants). The total value of receipted travel expenses, as
depicted in Figure 2.2, accumulates to 44 billion euros per year, with air
transportation and accommodation costs accounting for more than 50%. Another
important cost factor with a share of 17% are Other Cost (covering e.g. service
fees for travel agents, credit card charges, or public transport and taxi costs).
Figure 2.2: Split of Total Business Travel Cost (2004) by Cost Sectors5
Total: 44,0 Billion €
6,2 billion €(14%)
7,4 billion €(17%)
5,3 billion €(12%)
10,1 billion €(23%)
2,2 billion €(5%)
12,8 billion €(29%)
Flight Train Rental Car Accommodation Catering Other Cost
In general, the Total Travel Costs valued in the VDR analysis, are calculated on
the basis of individual travel expense reports. As these expenses are quite
apparent and easy measurable, they are commonly considered being the only
incurred cost of travel. In the course of this thesis, yet another cost factor – the
personnel cost factor - will be introduced. Travel induced personnel cost is an
important factor to consider and it should be valued when making the choice
between different available transport modes.
5 Source: Adapted from Verband Deutsches Reisemanagement e.V. (2005). p. 14.
5
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
2.2 Business Aviation
The term business aviation, as used in this context, describes business travel with
general aviation aircraft, whereby general aviation encompasses any flight other
than a military or scheduled airline flight.
The International Business Aviation Council Ltd. (IBAC) classifies business
aviation operators in three categories: Commercial, Corporate and Owner
Operated.6
While Owner Operated already implies the operation of a fully owned (or leased)
aircraft by the business owner, Corporate Business Aviation is defined as:
“A multi-engine or turbine powered aircraft transport operation on behalf
of a company, other than commercial air transportation, in connection
with the transport of passengers or cargo for that company, or another
member of the same group of companies, when flown by a pilot or pilots
paid for flying the aircraft.” 7
Some of the major companies in Germany that operate corporate fleets are:
BASF, Bauhaus, Bertelsmann, BMW, Bosch, Liebherr, Viessmann, Volkswagen,
and Würth.8
The cost-benefit analysis in Chapters 4 and 5 of this thesis will only concentrate on
the Commercial (air charter) side of business aviation. On-demand charter is
probably the easiest and cheapest way to partly start the shift from scheduled
airline travel. No costly up-front investments or long-term commitments are
required. Chartering an airplane for a single trip is similar to hiring a taxi.
Therefore, commercial air charter operators are commonly referred to as air taxi
companies. A more detailed description of this category will be given in Chapter
2.4. 6 See: IBAC (2000). 7 See: IBAC (2000). 8 See:HSH Nordbank (2005). p. 19.
6
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
A comparable cost-benefit analysis for other operating options cannot be
performed on an individual trip basis. A review of annual corporate travel
behaviour would have to be performed to determine the amount of travel required
to amortise the cost of aircraft ownership, depreciation and operation.
A similar model would have to be developed, if only Fractional Ownership is
acquired. Fractional Ownership programmes are normally offered only for turbojet
aircraft, with the most important provider in Europe being NetJets. The minimum
fraction to be acquired is 1/16 or 50 flight hours per year. In addition to paying the
aircraft share for a 5-year contract, monthly charges have to be borne for indirect
operating costs (e.g. crew, insurance, quality assurance) and variable costs (e.g.
fuel, landing fees, maintenance). Doing so, aircraft availability is guaranteed at all
times. Currently, NetJets’ fractional shares start at $ 406,250 (~ € 320,528) for a
1/16 interest in a Hawker 400XP.9
2.3 Regulatory Framework
The legal basis for any kind of commercial air transportation in Germany (and in
Europe) is set by the Joint Aviation Authorities (JAA).
“JAR-OPS Part 1 prescribes the requirements applicable to the
operation of any civil aeroplane for the purpose of commercial air
transportation by any operator whose principal place of business and, [if
any, its registered office] is in a JAA Member State.” 10
As opposed to corporate air services, air charter or air taxi companies are
commercial air transport providers. Thereby, they have to conduct their operation,
just like any commercial airline, in accordance with JAR-OPS 1 and the related
regulations.
9 See: NetJets (2006). 10 See: JAA (2006). JAR-OPS 1.001 (a)
7
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
2.4 Commercial Business Aviation
In Germany, there are more than 60 commercial air charter companies. Most
commonly, these companies operate turboprop and light to midsize jet aircraft,
with fleet sizes varying from one to more than 20 aircraft.11 A list of available air
charter companies in Germany is contained in the Appendix 1 of this thesis.
2.4.1 Customer Contracts
The relation between air taxi operators and their customers is expressed by either
On-Demand (Ad Hoc) Chartering or Contract Chartering (Block Charter).
Chartering an aircraft on-demand is basically like calling a taxi. Customers usually
make direct contact with the respective charter company. Arrangements can be
made, even on short notice, according to the customer’s needs. However, as
many charter companies operate rather small fleets, aircraft availability may not
always be guaranteed. In such cases, the use of a broker may be useful.
Meanwhile, several specialized air charter brokers (see Appendix 2) are available
to search the market for suitable offers on behalf of the customer.12 Where several
air charter offers are obtainable or market situation is unknown, this option may
save time and money, despite the brokerage fee that has to be paid.
Contract Charters, as opposed to On-Demand Chartering, are based on longer-
term contracts with a defined number of flight hours for the term of the contract. As
the minimum flight volume required for block charters is usually 100 hours, a
considerable amount of travel is required to justify such contracts. However, there
are generally price advantages connected with longer-term contracts.
11 See: Figgen, A. (2006). p. 46 et seqq. 12 See: Figgen, A. (2006). p. 56.
8
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
2.4.2 Pricing Structure 13
Generally, the prices for aircraft charter14 consist of two components: a fixed rate
per flight hour and additional charges.
The actual amount that is charged per flight hour depends on the type and size of
the aircraft that is chosen for the trip. The hourly rate is used by the operator to
cover the cost of ownership as well as the direct and indirect operating costs (e.g.
crew, fuel, ATC charges, catering). Additional charges depend on the
characteristics of the individual trip and usually contain the landing and potential
handling charges at the destination airport. A supplementary fuel surcharge,
common for many airlines may also be applied. For trips that require an overnight
stay, crew accommodation (around € 500) has to be covered separately.
In contrast to fractional ownership companies like NetJets, the regular air charter
or air taxi companies are fixed base operators. In general, all flights originate from
and return to the operator’s home base at the end of a mission. If a customer
requires his trip to start from (and return to) an airport different than the operator’s
home base, additional flights are required to bring the aircraft to the customer’s
location and back to home base. These positioning flights will also be charged to
the customer.
2.5 Business Aviation Aircraft
2.5.1 Common Aircraft Categories
The portfolio of aircraft available in business aviation is much wider than the
choices offered by scheduled airlines. Aircraft built specifically for business use
vary from four-seat, short-range, piston-powered airplanes to two- and three-
engine long range executive jets that can carry up to 19 passengers more than
12,000 kilometres non-stop. Some companies even use airline-type jets, and also 13 All information based on personal communication with air charter service providers. 14 Just like scheduled airline flights, charter flights with general aviation aircraft to non-domestic
destination are exempted from sales tax.
9
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
helicopters are sometimes used for business transportation. It is the operator’s
task to select the right aircraft for the required number of passengers, the stage
length, the purpose of the flight, as well as the status and the budget of the
customers. The categorisation of aircraft commonly available for business charter
is listed below.15
• Multi Piston Aircraft
• Turboprops
• Executive Jets
• Airliners
• Helicopters
Especially the first three categories deserve a closer look, when concentrating on
smaller passenger groups using commercial air charter for business travel within
Europe. The following chapters provide a short description of these three
categories of aircraft that are commonly used in business aviation. Nevertheless,
for the sample route calculations performed in Chapter 5 of his thesis only one
turboprop and one jet aircraft will be selected to make a comparison with airline
schedules and costs. A short description of the two aircraft models selected is
included in the following chapters.
2.5.1.1 Multi Piston Aircraft
Aircraft in the multi piston segment are propeller driven and powered by
reciprocating engines. Although engine technology is quite old and average
cruising speed is rather slow, twin piston aircraft are still common with a lot of air
charter companies. Not suitable for much more than carry-on baggage and usually
not equipped with on board lavatories, multi piston aircraft can only be used for
short distance flights.
15 See: Aircraft Charter World (2006).
10
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
The big advantage of multi piston aircraft however is the low acquisition cost,
which results in comparably low hourly rental rates. Nevertheless, the mentioned
limitations in size, speed and range basically restrict the use of multi-piston aircraft
for commercial business aviation to short distance flights with small passenger
numbers. Above all, the acceptance of the rather old technology in the business
travel sector is rather low.
2.5.1.2 Turboprops
Just like piston-powered aircraft, turboprops are also driven by propellers. The
main difference however is that the propellers are driven by turbines. This
technology in turn enables turboprops to reach considerably higher speeds.
Turboprop aircraft combine the low-cost advantages of the piston aircraft with the
ability to reach higher cruising speeds. Cabin comfort advantages generally
consist of pressurized passenger cabins, satellite telephone and a semi-private
lavatory. Furthermore, turboprops are often able to operate from runways that are
not suitable for turbojet aircraft. The economic advantage of turboprops is most
visible on short to medium range flights, where the speed advantage of the
turbojets is less dominant.16
The Raytheon Beech King Air B20017, able to accommodate up to eight
passengers, is chosen as typical example from this category. The King Air B200
has a maximum cruise speed of 292 kts (541 km/h) and a maximum range of
1,837 nm (3,402 km). Even with eight passengers almost any destination in
Europe can be reached non-stop from Germany. The aircraft can even operate
from airfields with a runway length of less than 2,600 ft (792 m). Average hourly
rates charged for a Beech King Air B200 are generally between € 1,500 and
€ 1,600.18
16 Information researched on business aircraft manufacturers’ websites. 17 See: Raytheon Aircraft Company. (2006). 18 Average rate derived from air charter company quotations and websites of air charter brokers.
11
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
2.5.1.3 Executive Jets
Aircraft in the Executive Jet segment are the most time efficient way of travel and
are mainly suitable for medium or long distance flights. With average non-stop
ranges of anything from 1,300 nm (~2,400 km) to 6,750 nm (~12,500 km), jets can
travel further and faster than most non-jet aircraft, while operating in and out of
airports that are often not accessible by the major airlines. In the lighter jets,
amenities often include a pressurized passenger cabins, satellite telephone and a
semi-private lavatory while mid size jets often have a private lavatory and external
baggage storage.19
As can be derived from Table 2.1, purchase prices - not surprisingly - increase
with the size of the aircraft. This however is translated to the hourly rates that have
to be paid for chartering the respective aircraft. While hourly rates in the entry
segment are still somewhere near € 2,000, a light medium size jet will usually not
be available below € 4,000 per hour.20
Table 2.1: Classification of Executive Jets21
Segment MTOW [lbs] Seats Range [nm] Price [million $]Entry 10 K – 13 K 4 - 7 1300 - 2500 2.4 - 6Light 13 K – 20 K 6 - 8 1450 - 1970 6 - 8Light Medium 20 K – 33 K 7 - 9 1940 - 2700 9 - 14Medium 33 K – 50 K 8 - 12 2000 - 3400 13 - 24Long Range 50 K – 80 K 5 - 19 3100 - 4500 21 - 34Very Long Range 80 K – 100 K 8 - 19 4800 - 6750 32 - 46
Source: Rolls Royce
For the purpose of this study, the Cessna 525 Citation Jet, a member of the entry
segment will be used for the sample route calculations in Chapter 5. The Citation
Jet can accommodate up to 5 passengers. It has a maximum range of 1,485 nm
(2,750 km), which is sufficient for the routes that will be evaluated. The maximum
cruising speed is 380 kts (704 km/h).22 The average hourly rate for chartering the
aircraft is approximately € 2,000.23
19 Information researched on business aircraft manufacturers’ websites. 20 Average rates derived from air charter company quotations and websites of air charter brokers. 21 Source: Adapted from HSH Nordbank AG (2005). p. 5. 22 See: Flug Revue (2006).
12
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
2.5.2 Very Light Jets – A Revolutionary Innovation?
A new category just about to enter the market is classified as Very Light Jets
(VLJ). Positioned between the Turboprops and the Entry Segment Executive Jets,
the low-priced VLJs are said to be a revolutionary innovation able to boost the air
charter market. To evaluate this statement, posted mainly by the respective
aircraft manufacturers, VLJs will also be examined as a fourth category. The
Eclipse 500 is supposed to be one of the first models to enter the market, with first
deliveries scheduled for autumn 2006. The purchase price as stated by the
manufacturer is currently set to $1.52 million,24 which is about one third the price
of an average conventional entry segment jet (see Table 2.1).
Evaluating the performance of the new VLJs is rather difficult, because they are
not yet operational. Performance data published by Eclipse Aviation25 state a
maximum IFR range of 1,300 nm (2,408 km). However, looking at the
specifications of the aircraft, the inherent limitations concerning the useful load26
are quite obvious. When operated with two pilots, the full fuel load can only be
carried with no more than one passenger27. With four passengers, holding only
hand baggage, the available fuel28 is already reduced by almost 30%. This will
most probably reduce the maximum range of the Eclipse 500 far below the one of
a Citation Jet.
This is just an estimation, based on the presently available data. A true evaluation
will only be possible after the first operational experiences have been gathered.
Nevertheless, a question mark should be placed behind the revolution potential
towards the European air charter business. Unlike the USA, most European
23 Average rate derived from air charter company quotations and websites of air charter brokers. 24 See: Eclipse Aviation Corp. (2006). 25 See: Eclipse Aviation Corp. (2006). 26 Useful load = Maximum Certificated Takeoff Weight (MTOW)- Basic Empty Weight (BEW) 27 For pilot weights, see: JAA (2006). JAR-OPS 1.615 (a) (2). For passenger weights, see: JAA
(2006). JAR-OPS 1.620 (e). 28 Available fuel = Useful load – (pilot weights + passenger weights)
13
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
countries currently require two pilots for all commercial turbojet flights29. This not
only doubles the crew cost, but given the already limited useful load of the Eclipse
500, this further reduces the payload/range. As flexibility in range and passenger
group size is rather low, the economic arguments for VLJs may not be as
convincing in Europe, particularly for air taxi operations. Furthermore, the comfort
level with four passengers in the relatively small cabin can probably not be
compared to that of other business aircraft.
“A King Air would have a longer range, although it would be slightly
inferior in speed. However, it certainly would be a lot more comfortable
for passengers; you wouldn’t feel like you were cramped into the back
of your dad’s Pontiac.” 30
The higher market potential for such an aircraft can probably be expected in the
area of owner operation (where single pilot operation will be possible), as there is
still a cost advantage arising from the low acquisition cost.
2.6 Benefits of Business Aviation
There may be several reasons for companies to use business aviation instead of
scheduled airlines. Starting with the fact that a trip aboard a business aircraft is
more comfortable and convenient than regular airline travel, regular users point to
many more advantages.31 Several studies have already been made to elaborate
this multi-layered range of benefits and advantages, mainly relating to the
operation of corporate fleets.32 While many of these advantages are rather
intangible, some of them directly translate into tangible benefits that can be
expressed in monetary values. The following chapters will outline the most
important benefits that are relevant for the subsequent cost-benefit analysis.
29 See: JAA (2006). JAR-OPS 1.940 (b) (1) 30 Richard Aboulafia, vice president of the Teal Group. See: di Piazza, K. (2004). 31 See: PRC Aviation. (1995). p. 4.3. 32 See: Arthur Andersen LLP (2001). p. 12 et seqq. See: PRC Aviation. (1995). p. 3-1 et. seqq.
14
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
2.6.1 Personnel Time Savings
TIME – for many people it is just another four-letter word, but for a fast-paced,
right-sized company in a globalised economy there is never enough of it. Time is a
finite good. It is in short supply and there is no way to manufacture more of it. On
closer examination, at last, there may as well be ways to manufacture more time,
or something that looks a lot like it: the productive use of available time.
Employee time is a tangible cost, as salary and bonuses pay for it. By providing an
opportunity to compress total door-to-door travel time, productivity is improved and
travel related employee cost can be noticeably reduced.33 Business aviation can
provide this opportunity by offering passenger-directed schedules for direct point-
to-point connections. For economic reasons, scheduled airline networks normally
consist of a hub-and-spoke structure, with only a few lucrative direct point-to-point
connections.34 Most frequently, at least one transfer has to be accepted when
travelling from or to non-hub airports.
Schedules that require late night travel, or longer than necessary trips, often result
in post-trip fatigue, damaging productivity in the day(s) after the trip. Because they
can facilitate more efficient scheduling, business aircraft can minimize this loss.
Above all, unwanted and costly overnight stays may be avoided by the ability to
custom-fit business aviation schedules.35
2.6.2 Increased En Route Productivity
En route productivity, meaning the incremental work output completed by
employees when travelling on an aircraft, strongly depends on the prevailing and
perceived working conditions aboard the specific aircraft. Commercial airliners
usually operate in a high load factor environment. Thereby, they can only provide
33 See: Arthur Andersen LLP (2001). p. 10 et seq. 34 See: Pompl, W. (2002). p. 402 et seqq. 35 See: PRC Aviation. (1995). p. 3-20 et seq.
15
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
a constricted amount of personal space to the passenger, limiting his ability and
willingness to work productively.36
Lack of privacy and the associated risk of revealing secret information are further
hampering factors. Highly visible laptop screens make it easy to read over
another’s shoulder or from halfway down the aisle. In the attempt to protect
industrial security, some companies even urge their employees not to work on
sensitive projects aboard scheduled commercial aircraft. Other companies even
forbid their executives to discuss any business en route.
In contrast, the office-like environment on a business aircraft enables employees
to be more productive en route when compared to a scheduled commercial
airliner. Many business travellers use the flight time aboard a business aircraft to
hold meetings in an interruptions-free, secure meeting space, typically featuring
comfortable, usable work surfaces with ample room for both a laptop and papers
in a secure and private atmosphere. The proposition that work en route is the rule
rather than the exception is one of the key attractions of business aircraft.37
In a survey conducted in 1997 by Louis Harris & Associates, 346 frequent
business travellers in the United States were questioned about their en route
productivity aboard scheduled and business aircraft. According to the survey,
productive collaboration among company employees aboard business aircraft
occurred nearly eight times as often as when those same employees were aboard
commercial aircraft. Productive collaboration with customers occurred nearly
seven times more often than on commercial aircraft. Furthermore, employees
aboard commercial aircraft were more than twice as likely to be resting or reading
non work-related materials.38 The specific results concerning the individual usage
of time aboard aircraft are shown in Figure 2.3 below.
36 See: Arthur Andersen LLP (2001). p. 18. 37 See: Arthur Andersen LLP (2001). p. 18. 38 See: Louis Harris & Associates, Inc. (1997). p. 11.
16
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
Figure 2.3: Usage of time aboard aircraft39
1%
23%
32%
38%
1%
5%
0%
11%
13%
28%
7%
41%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%
Other
Rest
Non-Work
IndividualWork
CustomerMeetings
EmployeeMeetings
Commercial Aircraft Business Aircraft
These same passengers also were asked to rate their in-flight productivity while
travelling, benchmarked against an average or typical hour in their office (see
Figure 2.4).
Figure 2.4: Passenger Productivity Aboard Aircraft Where FIVE Represents a
Typical Office Hour40
5
6.2
5.2
3.2
2.1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Office BusinessJet
BusinessTurboprop
Airline Jet CommuterTurboprop
Mea
n Pr
oduc
tivity
Rat
ing
39 Source: Adapted from Louis Harris & Associates, Inc. (1997). p. 11. 40 Source: Adapted from Louis Harris & Associates, Inc. (1997). p. 13.
17
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
According to the survey, the passengers felt they were significantly more
productive aboard business aircraft than they would be even in their own offices.
Business aircraft passengers rated their productivity in a business jet at 6.2 on a
0-10 scale, which set 5 as the productivity level in an average or typical office
hour. Average productivity in a business turboprop was reported as 5.2 while
productivity aboard airline jets was rated as 3.2 and commuter turboprops as
2.1.41
2.6.3 Choice of airport
When using business aircraft, the additional access to general aviation airports is
another valuable advantage.
“In 2005, nearly 100,000 different airport pairs were flown by business
aviation [within Europe]. Of these airport pairs, only 5% had a
scheduled alternative: at least one scheduled flight per working day.” 42
In Germany alone, there are more than 170 civil use airports with a paved runway
length of more than 2,000 ft (610 m)43. Apparently, not all of these airports qualify
for scheduled airline operation, because of potential limitations in runway length or
general airport infrastructure. The majority, however, is not being served because
the demand is not sufficient to ensure profitable airline service. In 39% of all
cases, the reason for the use of a business aircraft is to reach destinations with no
or infrequent scheduled airline service.44 Serving these niche markets is not only a
great opportunity for the business aviation sector. It also represents a tangible
benefit for their customers, as origin and destination (O&D) selection is no longer
restricted to airline offerings.
41 See: Louis Harris & Associates, Inc. (1997). p. 13. 42 See: EUROCONTROL (2006). p. 22. 43 See Appendix 3. 44 See: Louis Harris & Associates, Inc. (1997). p. 9.
18
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
Choosing the departure and arrival airports closest to the place of business can
drastically reduce the ground access times and thereby result in considerable
door-to-door travel time reductions. Moreover, general aviation airports and
general aviation terminals at scheduled airline airports are characterized by short
ground processing times. More convenient parking and quick-access passenger
facilities account for essentially reduced ground times, especially considering the
laborious post 9/11 security measures implemented at scheduled airline airports.
2.6.4 Operational Flexibility
As opposed to the fixed commercial airline schedules, business aviation schedules
are designed to meet the individual customers needs. More than 60% of the
business aircraft passengers use business aircraft to support their tight business
schedules that could not be efficiently met using commercial airlines.45 Idle time at
the destination and mindless time hanging around airports can be avoided. Above
all, if the planned business is running long, scheduled carriers will not wait, but a
business aircraft will. This lets employees pursue their business, without having to
be concerned about missed planes or unplanned overnight stays.46
Furthermore, as air service fares for business aircraft are independent of the
number of passengers, additional specialists or trainees can be taken along on
short notice without creating remarkable increases in direct travel expenses.
2.6.5 Improved Employee Morale and Loyalty
Using business aircraft to provide easy access to markets that are poorly served
by the scheduled airlines can motivate especially those employees who frequently
have to travel to destinations that are inherently isolated and relatively
inaccessible.
45 See: Louis Harris & Associates, Inc. (1997). p. 8. 46 See: PRC Aviation. (1995). p. 3-21.
19
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
“Employees being required to travel in the public transportation system
to remote or difficult to reach locations might find the first trip an
adventure, the second a chore and the third a factor in quitting (or
finding excuses for not servicing the client). The opportunity to reach
markets such as these quickly and efficiently can recharge work force
morale, and re-motivate the affected.” 47
Furthermore, the cumulative effect of non-business hours spent away from home,
“The Divorce Factor” as it is sometimes called, should not be underestimated.
“Family Time” before and after traditional business hours is critical to most
employees. Constantly pushing travel time into this area can have an acute effect
on employee morale and productivity. It is up to senior management to decide how
important employee time away from home and family really is to the company.
Ultimately, these soft factors will influence employee satisfaction, which in turn
affects productivity and loyalty. Providing a comfortable working environment
including hassle-free travel opportunities is one of the key conditions that are
required to retain key personal that is expensive or impossible to replace.
47 See: Arthur Andersen LLP (2001). p. 22.
20
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
3 Finding the Niche Markets
3.1 Business Intelligence
Business Intelligence (BI) can be defined as:
“The processes, technologies, and techniques needed to turn data into
information, information into knowledge, and knowledge into plans that
drive profitable business action. Business intelligence encompasses
data warehousing, business analytical tools, and content/knowledge
management.” 48
It is the process of analysing and exploring the information hidden in data to
deliver better strategic solutions for the business user. This process normally
requires extensive data warehousing. A data warehouse is generally a collection
of computerised data that is organised to most optimally support reporting and
analysis activity. The first step in creating a data warehouse is the collection of the
relevant information from either primary or secondary data sources49. All too often,
business data (both primary and secondary) that need to be derived from external
sources are hard to get, and data quality may vary depending on the credibility of
the source. Therefore, integrity and validity of the data need to be investigated,
before trying to turn mountains of data into valuable and reliable business
information. Furthermore, database tables need to be normalized50 to ensure that
redundant data are eliminated and existing data dependencies are meaningful. In
the next step, adequate analytical tools are required to uncover important data
patterns that can contribute to business strategies, knowledge bases or scientific
researches.51
48 See: Loshin, D. (2003). p. 6. 49 Primary Data is information collected directly from first-hand sources, specifically for the
investigation at hand. Secondary Data has been compiled for some purpose other than the current
investigation. 50 The concept of database normalization was first introduced in 1970 by Edgar Frank Codd in his
paper “A Relational Model of Data for Large Shared Data Banks”. 51 See: Han, J., Kamber, M. (2001). p. 3 et.seqq.
21
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
3.2 Methodology
When trying to find the niche markets for business aviation, one first has to define
the criteria that describe such markets. The aim of this chapter is to geographically
identify target regions or target destinations that best fit the characteristics of
business aviation.
The major advantages of business aviation over scheduled airline travel are
increased flexibility and time saving aspects as described in the previous chapters.
The magnitude of time saved is different for every single O&D, and may also vary
depending on the day of week.
As outlined in Chapter 2.1, the majority of business trips performed by employees
of German companies are domestic. However, the German domestic travel market
is characterized by relatively short distances and a high density of scheduled
airline flights. Furthermore, ground transportation infrastructure is quite
sophisticated. Domestic air travel in general faces fierce competition, especially
from an increasing number of high-speed train connections. Still there are a lot of
opportunities for business aviation in the domestic market. Depending on company
location and airline connectivity, business aviation can yield valuable time savings
as a feeder for international airline connections. The time saving potential is even
more obvious concerning trips from and to non-metropolitan areas. Access to
major airports may require extensive and inconvenient ground transportation.
Quite frequently, travel times can be considerably shortened by using general
aviation airports that are often more conveniently located, but not served by the
commercial airlines. Choice of airports, as explained before, is one of the main
benefits of business aviation.
Even with regard to the airports served by commercial airlines, the offered
schedules cannot always satisfy the business traveller’s need for flexible and most
direct travel opportunities. Besides accessibility of airports, the main decision
criteria for the choice of airline connection in business travel are:52
52 See: Maurer, P. (2003). p. 335.
22
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
• Total en route time
• Time of the day
• Frequency
• Short and convenient hub transfers
• Attractiveness of the hub
• Ticket price.
These criteria have to be used to identify possible niche markets for business
aviation. To actually find these potential niches in Europe, the European
scheduled airline network must be analysed with regard to the needs of business
travel. The scenario used here is based on time saving opportunities. The basic
idea is to find valuable business destinations, to which the scheduled airlines
cannot provide a “There-and-back-in-a-day” option with sufficient time between
arrival and departure to efficiently conduct business. Business travellers are
mainly looking for timely connections that are offered daily and with high
frequency, especially in the morning and late afternoon. Because not all
destinations are served by direct flights, the analysis also includes multi-leg
connections routed through hub airports. For the purpose of this analysis, a
maximum of three legs is considered to be acceptable. The connectivity of flights
is limited by the Minimum Connecting Time (MCT), the shortest possible transfer
time between two flights. The MCT varies between airports and may range from
25 minutes up to more than two hours, depending on airport size and efficiency of
processes.53 Above that, an acceptable Maximum Connecting Time is defined.
The applied criteria for a “There-and-back-in-a-day” option as used in the course
of this analysis are as follows:
• Arrival at destination airport at or before 11:00 lcl
• Existing return option at or after 17:00 lcl
• Return to departure airport before midnight
• Minimum Connecting Time: 00:45 hrs54
• Maximum Connecting Time: 3:30 hrs. 53 See: Sterzenbach, R. Conrady, R. (2003) p. 290. 54 See: Sterzenbach, R. Conrady, R. (2003) p. 290.
23
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
3.2.1 Availability of Data
Seriously evaluating all possible airline connections between Germany and any
European destinations, including multi-leg hub connections, requires handling of a
vast amount of data. However, before the data can be examined, the question of
where to get these data needs to be answered. Manually extracting flight data
from airline schedules or airport websites is not a feasible solution. A tremendous
amount of time would be required to create a database that will most probably not
be complete. Fortunately, compiled airline schedule information is available from
different professional sources. Unfortunately, all of these sources do not provide
the information for free. Fortunately again, access could be gained to two of these
sources. The first data set contained direct intra-European airline connections for
the year 2005 in the SSIM55 format. The set contained a total of 323,315 lines.
Table 3.1 shows a data sample. The format is already converted for better
readability.
Table 3.1: SSIM Date - European Airline Schedule 2005
The second set of data was an extract of all direct intra-European airline
connections for May 2006, derived from APG56 Data. The data were compiled in
an Excel table containing 43,486 lines. A data sample is shown in Table 3.2.
Table 3.2: APGDAT - European Airline Schedule May 2006 Schedule Full Extract Report for all Airlines for flights between Europe and Europe in May06
Al Flight Alliance Op Al Org Dst Departure Time Arrival Time Block Mins Op Days Tot/Wk KMs Equip SeatsBA 715 ONEW BA ZRH LHR 1520 1605 105 .2....7 2 789 319 126BA 717 ONEW BA ZRH LHR 1715 1805 110 .....6. 1 789 321 176BA 717 ONEW BA ZRH LHR 1715 1805 110 12345.7 6 789 319 126BA 719 ONEW BA ZRH LHR 1915 2005 110 12345.7 6 789 321 176BD 323 STAR BD ABZ AMS 0715 1000 105 123456. 6 705 ER4 49BD 325 STAR BD ABZ AMS 1155 1440 105 12345.7 6 705 ER4 49BD 327 STAR BD ABZ AMS 1630 1915 105 12345.7 6 705 ER4 49BD 363 STAR BD ABZ EBJ 1020 1240 80 1234... 4 687 ER3 37BD 363 STAR BD ABZ EBJ 1425 1645 80 ......7 1 687 ER3 37
55 SSIM files (IATA Standard Schedule Manual, Chapter 7) form the backbone of schedule
exchange in the airline industry. 56 Seabury Airline Planning Group, LLC. See http://www.seaburyapg.com/tools/apgdat.html
24
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
3.2.2 Analysis Tools
Working with such an amount of data requires a powerful software tool. The
primary software used for the analysis was SAS57 for Windows, which is a very
flexible and stable analysis programme. The raw data sets described above were
imported into SAS for further handling. As the available schedule data only
provided direct connections, all possible multi-leg connections had to be created
from the given airline schedule data sets. A valuable feature in SAS, used
frequently in the course of the analysis, is the possibility to create new tables
based on available raw data or existing SAS files. SAS tables, or only parts of
tables, can then be joined based on specified matching criteria.58 The join is
performed in the SAS programme using PROC SQL59. In theory, when a join is
executed, SAS builds an internal list of all combinations of all rows in the query
data sets. Conceptually, SAS evaluates the newly created table row by row,
selecting only the rows that satisfy the defined matching criteria.60 Further details
on the process of joining the tables and the relevant matching criteria are shown in
Chapters 3.2.2 and 3.2.3.
3.2.3 Data Validity and Integrity
When working with secondary data, it is imperative to investigate the validity and
integrity of the data sets.
SSIM DATA
The SSIM Data set contained the flight schedule for the whole year 2005, whereby
most flights/flight numbers appeared several times with different Itinerary Variation
57 Statistical Analysis System Software by SAS Institute Inc. (for further information on SAS see
http://www.sas.com) 58 See: Delwiche, L., Slaughter, J. (2003). p. 302 et seqq. 59 SQL (Structured Query Language) is a very popular language used to create, update and
retrieve data in relational databases.60 See: Wieczkowski, M. (1999).
25
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
Identifiers (Itin_VI)61. In the process of normalization, a sample week (16 – 22
May) was defined and entries with validity dates outside this sample week were
deleted.
To investigate the integrity of the data set, a few O&Ds were chosen and checked
against current schedules, published on airport and airline websites. The
investigation showed that the available SSIM data set was corrupted. A lot of
available connections were missing, and the given differences between UTC and
local time did not in total reflect the time changes during Daylight Saving Time
(DST) periods. Although the problem concerning UTC differences could be
rectified, the data set was rendered unusable because the exact number and type
of missing connections could not be specified.
APG Data
The second data set containing all intra-European flights for May 2006, derived
from APG, did pass the integrity checks against current airline schedules as
described above and was used as the basis for further analysis.
3.2.4 Creation of a Master Data File
Although the APG Data were considered to be usable, some important information
was missing and had to be appended. The APG data did not show indicators for
the departure and arrival countries, as well as no specification of the difference
between UTC and local time. As this information was contained and previously
corrected in the SSIM data set, the relevant entries were retained in a separate
table and joined with the APG data with the use of the SAS programme.
61 “An itinerary is a single flight or a series of identical flights defined by a continuous Period and
Day(s) of Operation (and Frequency Rate if applicable), each of which consists of one or more
contiguous legs, which taken together, describe a complete routing of that flight.
The Itinerary Variation Identifier is a number between 01 and 99 used to differentiate between
itineraries having the same Flight Designator […].” See: IATA (1998). p. 45.
26
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
Further normalization required a split of the multivariate entries for Days of
Operation (Op Days)62 into separate entries for each operation day. Records for
the respective arrival day as well as combined departure- and arrival-datetimes63
(UTC) had to be created to enable the calculation of Minimum and Maximum
Connecting Times. With these modifications incorporated, the data set contained a
total of 125,690 direct intra-European flights64 for the selected sample week (15 –
20 May 2006). It was used as a Master Data File (MDF), and will be referred to as
such in the following chapters.
3.3 Evaluation of Intra-European Airline Connections
After having created the MDF, the actual investigation of the airline schedule was
divided into three parts, relating to:
• direct connections,
• one-stop connections, and
• two-stop connections.
The qualification criteria for a “There-and-Back-in-a-Day” option, as outlined in
Chapter 3.1, were applied in SAS to retain only entries that can fulfil the given
prerequisites. The individual results, all related to the “There-and-Back-in-a Day”
option, were finally exported from SAS to Excel and compounded in a synoptic
table for better visualisation.
3.3.1 Direct Connections
To extract the possible direct connections, the Master Data File was subdivided
into a separately evaluated outbound and inbound section, applying the following
restrictions to the MDF:
62 See Table 3.2. 63 Datetime format defines (UTC) time at a specific day: dd.mmm.yy hh:mm. 64 Not including flights with origin and/or destination in Russia.
27
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
• Outbound: Departure Country = DE and Arrival Country ≠ DE
STA ≤ 11:00 lcl
• Inbound: Departure Country ≠ DE and Arrival Country = DE.
STD ≥ 17:00 lcl and STA ≤ 24:00 lcl
The result showed a weekly total of 2,873 direct flights departing from Germany
and arriving at the destination before 11:00 lcl. The number of direct return flights
to Germany, leaving at or after 17:00 lcl, was 3,852.
3.3.2 One-Stop Connections
As only direct flight connection data were available, the creation of possible
connecting flights required the direct flight tables to be joined. The tables used for
the join were copies of the Master Data File. In addition to the respective “There-
and-back-in-a-day” criteria, further restrictions were applied to the individual files
during the join to reduce the amount of data to be processed. The resulting
principle for the creation of the one-stop connections and the additional matching
criteria used are illustrated below.
Figure 3.1: Creation of One-Stop Connections with SAS
MDF
Departure Country = DE
Outbound (Leg 1)
Arrival Airport (Leg 1) = Departure Airport (Leg 2)
MDF
Arrival Country ≠ DE
Outbound (Leg 2)
MDF
Departure Country ≠ DE
Inbound (Leg 1)
Arrival Airport (Leg 1) = Departure Airport (Leg 2)
MDF
Arrival Country = DE
Inbound (Leg 2)
MDF
Departure Country = DE
Outbound (Leg 1)
Arrival Airport (Leg 1) = Departure Airport (Leg 2)
MDF
Arrival Country ≠ DE
Outbound (Leg 2)
MDF
Departure Country = DE
Outbound (Leg 1)
MDF
Departure Country = DE
Outbound (Leg 1)
Arrival Airport (Leg 1) = Departure Airport (Leg 2)
MDF
Arrival Country ≠ DE
Outbound (Leg 2)
MDF
Arrival Country ≠ DE
Outbound (Leg 2)
MDF
Departure Country ≠ DE
Inbound (Leg 1)
Arrival Airport (Leg 1) = Departure Airport (Leg 2)
MDF
Arrival Country = DE
Inbound (Leg 2)
MDF
Departure Country ≠ DE
Inbound (Leg 1)
MDF
Departure Country ≠ DE
Inbound (Leg 1)
Arrival Airport (Leg 1) = Departure Airport (Leg 2)
MDF
Arrival Country = DE
Inbound (Leg 2)
MDF
Arrival Country = DE
Inbound (Leg 2)
28
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
The created files showed a total of 27,239 possible one-stop connections from
Germany to European destinations, whereas 52,944 connections met the return
flight criteria.
3.3.3 Two-Stop Connections
Creation of two-stop connections is similar to the process described in Chapter
3.2.2 above. To create the additional leg, yet another copy of the Master Data File
had to be joined in-between the first and the second leg. This was achieved by
joining the MDF onto Leg 1 and then joining the final leg onto the previously
created file (Leg 1+2). The joining principle for the two consecutive joins, the
restrictions applied to the individual MDF derivates, and the matching criteria on
top of those for a “There-and-Back-in-a-Day” option are shown in the following
diagram.
Figure 3.2: Creation of Two-Stop Connections with SAS
MDF
Departure Country = DE
Outbound (Leg 1)
Arrival Airport (Leg 1) = Departure Airport (Leg 2)
Departure Airport (Leg 1) ≠ Arrival Airport (Leg 2)
MDF
Outbound (Leg 2)
MDF
Arrival Country ≠ DE
Outbound (Leg 3)
Arrival Airport (Leg 1+2) = Departure Airport (Leg 3)
Arrival Airport (Leg 1) ≠ Arrival Airport (Leg 3)
Outbound (Leg 1+2)
MDF
Departure Country ≠ DE
Inbound (Leg 1)
Arrival Airport (Leg 1) = Departure Airport (Leg 2)
Departure Airport (Leg 1) ≠ Arrival Airport (Leg 2)
MDF
Inbound (Leg 2)
MDF
Arrival Country = DE
Inbound (Leg 3)
Arrival Airport (Leg 1+2) = Departure Airport (Leg 3)
Arrival Airport (Leg 1) ≠ Arrival Airport (Leg 3)
Inbound (Leg 1+2)
MDF
Departure Country = DE
Outbound (Leg 1)
Arrival Airport (Leg 1) = Departure Airport (Leg 2)
Departure Airport (Leg 1) ≠ Arrival Airport (Leg 2)
MDF
Outbound (Leg 2)
MDF
Arrival Country ≠ DE
Outbound (Leg 3)
Arrival Airport (Leg 1+2) = Departure Airport (Leg 3)
Arrival Airport (Leg 1) ≠ Arrival Airport (Leg 3)
Outbound (Leg 1+2)
MDF
Departure Country = DE
Outbound (Leg 1)
MDF
Departure Country = DE
Outbound (Leg 1)
Arrival Airport (Leg 1) = Departure Airport (Leg 2)
Departure Airport (Leg 1) ≠ Arrival Airport (Leg 2)
MDF
Outbound (Leg 2)
MDF
Outbound (Leg 2)
MDF
Arrival Country ≠ DE
Outbound (Leg 3)
Arrival Airport (Leg 1+2) = Departure Airport (Leg 3)
Arrival Airport (Leg 1) ≠ Arrival Airport (Leg 3)
Outbound (Leg 1+2)
MDF
Departure Country ≠ DE
Inbound (Leg 1)
Arrival Airport (Leg 1) = Departure Airport (Leg 2)
Departure Airport (Leg 1) ≠ Arrival Airport (Leg 2)
MDF
Inbound (Leg 2)
MDF
Arrival Country = DE
Inbound (Leg 3)
Arrival Airport (Leg 1+2) = Departure Airport (Leg 3)
Arrival Airport (Leg 1) ≠ Arrival Airport (Leg 3)
Inbound (Leg 1+2)
MDF
Departure Country ≠ DE
Inbound (Leg 1)
MDF
Departure Country ≠ DE
Inbound (Leg 1)
Arrival Airport (Leg 1) = Departure Airport (Leg 2)
Departure Airport (Leg 1) ≠ Arrival Airport (Leg 2)
MDF
Inbound (Leg 2)
MDF
Inbound (Leg 2)
MDF
Arrival Country = DE
Inbound (Leg 3)
Arrival Airport (Leg 1+2) = Departure Airport (Leg 3)
Arrival Airport (Leg 1) ≠ Arrival Airport (Leg 3)
Inbound (Leg 1+2)
29
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
After joining the tables a total of 7,821 possible connections were created for the
outbound portion and 22,005 for the return option.
3.4 Airline Schedule Evaluation Results
The intention of the airline schedule evaluation was to find valuable O&Ds with no
“There-and-Back-in-a-Day” option as potential niche markets for commercial
business aviation. Having extracted all the connections that satisfied the stated
criteria, a synoptic table was created to visualise the results. As not all possible
O&Ds could be displayed, further confinements were made regarding the
examined origins and destinations.
Ten major origin airports in Germany were chosen for further analysis:
Cologne/Bonn (CGN), Dortmund (DTM), Düsseldorf (DUS), Frankfurt (FRA),
Hanover (HAJ), Hamburg (HAM), Bremen (BRE), Munich (MUC), Stuttgart (STR),
and Berlin (SXF, THF, TXL)65.
For these origin airports, ten destination countries in Northern and Eastern Europe
were chosen to exemplify the deficiencies in airline connectivity. These ten
selected countries were: Finland, Norway, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Bulgaria,
Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Lithuania.
Because not all the flights were operated on a daily basis, separate entries were
provided for each day of the week. A green coloured flag was assigned to those
O&Ds and days of the week66 where at least one round-trip connection existed
that met the “There-and-Back-in-a-Day” criteria (i.e. both inbound and outbound).
The results were quite surprising, as the total number of possible connections was
far lower than expected.
65 For the purpose of the analysis, the three Berlin airports were considered to be one single
origin/destination. 66 Days of the week are numbered from Monday (1) to Sunday (7).
30
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
Table 3.3 is an extract of the synoptic table showing only the available “There-and-
Back-in-a-Day” options from the selected airports in the Rhine-Ruhr area (CGN,
DTM, DUS). The complete tables are available in Appendix 4.
Table 3.3: “There-and-Back-in-a-Day” options from the Rhine-Ruhr Area
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7FI HEL
OSLTRFSOF E E EVAROSRPRG
HU BUDLV RIX
GDNKRKKT
E E
WWAW
RO OTP
There-and-back-in-a-day option Departure from DE before 04:30 lcl
toDUSfrom
NO
CGN DTM
BG
CZ
PL
E
E
From the ten destination countries investigated, Estonia and Lithuania do not show
a single possible connection. Moreover, the posted results for Bulgaria and
Romania are unsatisfactory, as not all the days of the week are covered, and the
few existing connections from Cologne/Bonn are afflicted with rather unpleasant
departure times (between 00:40 lcl and 04:25 lcl). For Finland, 21 destination
airports were investigated, with only Helsinki meeting the criteria from Düsseldorf
(and Frankfurt). Overall, no more than three destinations per country are served
according to the prescribed requirements from any of the selected German
airports.
All the white spots in the table are potential market opportunities for the operation
of business aircraft. By including all the general-aviation-only airports not served
by scheduled airlines into the table, the colour white would become even more
31
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
dominant. In reverse, this does not imply that the green sectors of the table are
inaccessible for business aviation. Depending on the individual business situation
and booking status of the airlines, there may as well be valuable opportunities in
those areas.
But which of the blank spots are the most valuable for a specific origin airport? As
many companies may not be aware of the potential benefits that can result from
the use of business aircraft, a detailed analysis of the economic situation in the
catchment area of that specific airport has to be conducted. The goal must be to
identify companies in the catchment area with the need for travel to any of the
mentioned blank spots in airline schedules. A detailed cost-benefit analysis, based
on actual company requirements, can then be used to evaluate potential cost
saving opportunities resulting from the use of business aircraft.
In the following chapter such a cost-benefit model will be developed. However, as
the purpose of this thesis is more generic, the destination examples used in
Chapter 5 to demonstrate the potential degree of savings are not related to
specific company relations and must be viewed in a more general context.
32
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
4 Cost-Benefit Analysis
4.1 Accounting and Economic Principles
According to cost accounting principles, cost is defined as a resource sacrificed or
forgone to achieve a specific objective. Such objectives are called cost objects.
They can be anything for which a separate measurement of costs is required (e.g.
products, machines, services, processes, activities). Depending on their
relationship to a particular cost object, costs are classified as direct or indirect.
Direct costs are directly related to the particular cost object. They can be traced to
it in an economically feasible way. Indirect costs (e.g. overhead costs) are also
related to the particular cost object but cannot be traced to it in an economically
feasible way. Therefore, a cost allocation method must be used to allocate the
indirect costs to the related cost object. The cost-allocation base (e.g. labour hours
or kilometres travelled) is the common denominator that must be specified to
establish the link between indirect costs and a specific cost object.67
Calculation of total cost is done differently by economists. Total accounting cost
generally equals explicit cost, defined as actual cash payments. The key principle
underlying the calculation of economic cost is the principle of opportunity cost. The
opportunity cost of something is basically what is sacrificed to get it. Quite often
opportunity cost is incurred by not using a limited resource in its best alternative.
Total economic cost equals explicit cost plus implicit cost, where implicit cost is
defined as the opportunity cost of improper use of resources (e.g. time, money).68
A Cost-benefit analysis is a quantitative economic comparison. Economic
performance can be evaluated by defining Key Success Factors, commonly called
KPIs (Key Performance Indicators). These operational factors directly affect the
economic viability of the organisation or specific cost objects within the
organisation. They can be related to cost, time, quality or flexibility. By any means,
67 See: Horngren, C. et al. (2005). p. 36 et seqq. 68 See: Case, R. Fair, R. (2004). p. 132 et seq.
33
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
they have to be quantifiable to yield measurable and meaningful results that can
be used for internal or external benchmarking.69
4.2 Methodology
To examine and evaluate the tangible, monetary implications of a potential switch
from scheduled airline travel to business aviation a cost-benefit analysis is
performed. The analysis is a quantitative economic comparison of selected
business trips. The comparison depicts the differences in travel time, explicit travel
costs and implicit costs (i.e. personnel costs) on an individual trip basis. The
challenge in creating such an analysis model is to find a meaningful method to
translate the tangible benefits described in Chapter 2.6 into monetary values. The
valuation of intangible advantages is different in every company and depends on
the individual employees personal situation and position within the company. It is
therefore hardly quantifiable. The cost savings calculation method used to quantify
the productivity benefits through time savings is outlined in the following chapters.
4.3 The Value of Time
In today’s world of business and commerce, time means money. The relation
paraphrased in this piece of wisdom can be quantitatively expressed in several
ways. Traditional accounting usually treated people as a period cost measured in
terms of salary.70 Thereby, the easiest and most common way to translate
employee time into a direct hourly cost metric is dividing the total annual salary by
the number of hours worked annually. This however does not reflect the added
value that a unit of employee time yields to the company. Common business
sense requires employees to generate more in revenue or profit improvement than
they are paid.71 Thereby, the value of an employee’s time must exceed its
compensation. Especially the value of a senior executive’s time often exceeds its
69 See: Brown, S. et al. (2001). p. 7 et seq. 70 See: Fitz-enz, J. (2000). p. 5. 71 See: Arthur Andersen LLP (2001). p. 13 et seq.
34
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
cost to the company by substantial margins. The field of Human Resource
Accounting (HRA) recognizes people, their training, skills and experience as
human capital assets, crucial to the company’s success.72 Complementing
traditional accounting theorems, a valuation of these assets must be performed to
determine the true economic value of employees. The main KPI used in this thesis
to measure the benefits resulting from employee time savings is the Value per
Man-Hour. It is a rather simple and efficient method of quantifying the actual value
of employee time. The Value per Man-Hour Concept is perhaps most tangibly
illustrated by the hourly billing rates found for personnel in service industries.
4.3.1 The Value per Man-Hour (VMH) Concept
When calculating travel expenses, the value of time is an important economic
factor that needs to be considered. To quantify the contribution of human
resources to a company’s profitability, HRA has established the principle that the
value of an employee’s time to the employer can be expressed by applying a
productivity factor to the employee’s salary. Again, the emphasis here is on value,
not simply on what a person earns per hour. The actual Value per Man-Hour
(VMH) can be calculated by dividing the average annual salary multiplied by the
employee’s productivity factor by the average annual working hours. 73
VMH = Average Annual Salary * Productivity Factor Average Annual Work Hours
Generally, the productivity factor increases with salary because higher salaries are
justified by increases in the employees contribution to company profitability. 74 The
only challenge remaining is the determination of the productivity factor for
individual employees or employee groups.
72 See: Paauwe, J. (2004). p. 186 et seqq. 73 See: Wells, A., Chadbourne, B. (2003). p. 182. 74 See: Ehrenberg, R., Smith, R. (2006). p. 369 et seqq.
35
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
4.3.2 Productivity Valuation Models
In a study conducted by PRC Aviation75 in 1995, productivity factors were
elaborated to determine the exact hourly value an employee has to the
organisation. The study concluded that an appropriate valuation of senior
executives’ time results from applying a multiplier of 5.7 to that executive’s total
compensation. For middle managers and professional employees, a multiplier of
3.8 was judged to be appropriate.76 These productivity factors are averages of
multipliers taken from different valuation models as outlined in Table 4.1.
Table 4.1: Multipliers of Base Salary Resulting From Application of Methods of
Computing Corporate Values of Employees For Typical Corporations77
Method Senior ExecutivesMiddle Managementand Professionals All Employees
Cost of average base salary 1.0 1.0 1.0
Value Methods
Service Industries 5.0 - 7.0 2.5 - 5.0 2.5
Five Times Salary 10.9 - 12.2 4.8 - 8.0 -
Ten Percent Rule Whole Life 4.9 - - Term Insurance 20 - -
Benefit Term Insurance 5.0 - 7.0 3 -
Replacement Cost Present Value of Term of Replacement 5.0 - 5.3 3.5 -
Present Value of Term of Replacement Plus Inefficiencies
6.4 - 6.7 4.8 -
Loss of Excess Earnings 13.1 - -
Conference Board - - 2.3
PRC Aviation Evaluationof Several Methods 5.7 3.8 -
75 In 1997, PRC Aviation was acquired by Arthur D. Little, an international consulting firm based in
Cambridge, Mass. 76 See: PRC Aviation. (1995). p. 3-1. 77 Source: Adapted from PRC Aviation. (1995). p. 6-9.
36
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
Besides the fact that the elaborated productivity factors appear to be rather low,
the results of the PRC study may only be used to get an impression of the
approximate value of productivity for certain employee groups. A distinct link
between annual salary and VMH cannot be established, as actual salary ranges
for the mentioned employee groups are dependent on a lot of factors, such as kind
of industry or company size.
A model that directly provides such linkages was initially developed by the
Business & Commercial Aviation magazine. This model directly shows the VMH in
conjunction with the related annual salary by establishing a linear relation between
hourly pay and productivity factor.78 The model is shown in Table 4.2, with original
dollar values converted to euros.79 Furthermore, a slight modification is applied.
The originally used annual work hour base of 2,000 hours was raised to 2,300
hours. This seems to be a more appropriate number, especially for the service
sector.
Table 4.2: The Value of Executive Time80
Yearly Salary Hourly Pay Productivity Factor Value/Hour
10,000.00 € 4.35 € 2.76 12.00 €20,000.00 € 8.70 € 5.52 48.01 €30,000.00 € 13.04 € 8.28 108.03 €40,000.00 € 17.39 € 11.04 192.05 €50,000.00 € 21.74 € 13.80 300.08 €60,000.00 € 26.09 € 16.56 432.12 €70,000.00 € 30.43 € 19.33 588.16 €80,000.00 € 34.78 € 22.09 768.21 €90,000.00 € 39.13 € 24.85 972.26 €
100,000.00 € 43.48 € 27.61 1,200.33 €110,000.00 € 47.83 € 30.37 1,452.40 €120,000.00 € 52.17 € 33.13 1,728.47 €130,000.00 € 56.52 € 35.89 2,028.55 €140,000.00 € 60.87 € 38.65 2,352.64 €150,000.00 € 65.22 € 41.41 2,700.74 €200,000.00 € 86.96 € 55.22 4,801.31 €250,000.00 € 108.70 € 69.02 7,502.04 €400,000.00 € 173.91 € 110.43 19,205.23 €
78 See: Wells, A., Chadbourne, B. (2003). p.182. 79 Exchange Rate: 1 EUR = 1.27005 USD 80 Source: Adapted from Wells, A., Chadbourne, B. (2003). p.182.
37
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
No matter which model or valuation scheme is used, the fact remains that when a
manager or other key person is away from the office, the contact time with other
subordinates or peers is shortened and issues that need immediate attention must
wait. To improve this situation, the following chapter will provide a methodology to
calculate required VMH values as the main decision criteria for an economic
choice between airline and business aviation.
Given the fact that there are tremendous differences in the magnitude of the
multipliers in the different models and especially in different industries, it cannot be
in the interest of this thesis to base the analysis on a specific correlation between
annual salary and productivity. It is the responsibility of the companies themselves
to create their own valuation schemes to be aware of the actual value of their
employees’ time. Nevertheless, tables 4.1 and 4.2 will be used in Chapter 5 to
provide an indication for the salary ranges that may correspond to the calculated
VMH values.
4.4 Time and Cost Calculations
When evaluating the cost of travel, it is imperative to consider not only the explicit
(accounting) costs, but also the implicit personnel costs that are induced by the
need to travel. This does not relate to travel expenses, like lodging or per diems,
as these are treated as a part of the explicit cost package.
One might argue that personnel cost will arise no matter if the respective
employee is travelling or not. However, implicit personnel cost are incurred
because of:
• unnecessarily prolonged travel times that could have been avoided by
optimised scheduling, and
• reductions in employee productivity that can be experienced during different
parts of the travel.
38
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
While employee productivity is considered to be 100% during times spent in-house
or at scheduled out-of-office business, it can be drastically reduced by inherent
restrictions associated with different segments of the travel. These productivity
losses can be viewed as potential revenue forgone and must be treated as an
opportunity cost. For this purpose, it is necessary to split the total travel time into
individual segments and define specific marginal productivity/cost factors per
segment that can be applied to the employee’s VMH. The travel time
segmentation and the applied cost factors are outlined in the following chapter.
4.4.1 Time Calculation
An Excel table (Table 4.3) is used to perform the necessary time calculations81. All
calculations are made for airline travel as well as for the use of a business
turboprop and a business jet.
Table 4.3: Time Calculation Table 82
Airline Business TP Business JetOutboundOffice to Airport 0.75 0.75 0.75Terminal Boarding 0.75 0.25 0.25En RouteDeplaning 0.75 0.25 0.25Airport to Office 0.75 0.75 0.75
Total Outbound 3.00 2.00 2.00
ReturnOffice to Airport 0.75 0.75 0.75Terminal Boarding 0.75 0.25 0.25En RouteDeplaning 0.75 0.25 0.25Airport to Office 0.75 0.75 0.75
Total Return 3.00 2.00 2.00
Total Travel Time 6.00 4.00 4.00
Add. Out-of-Office 0.00 0.00
Total Valued Time 6.00 4.00 4.00
Elapsed Time (hrs)
81 Entries are required for the coloured fields only. Other times may be amended if necessary. 82 Time calculations adapted from Wells, A., Chadbourne, B. (2003). p. 183.
39
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
Segment times for the outbound and return portion are stated separately. For the
ground segments (all except En Route) standard time spans are already pre-
defined for further use in the following analysis. These time spans are assumed to
be realistic averages. Depending on the characteristics of the respective airports
or personal experience these values may be adjusted.83
Office to Airport and Airport to Office
Office to Airport and Airport to Office times include the drive time from office or
home to the airport and the time from parking to the terminal. These times are
strongly dependent on company location and airport choice. As the following
sample calculations in Chapter 5 are not related to a specific company profile, a
standard of 45 minutes (0.75 hours) will be used for all three aircraft options.
However, general aviation airports are often more conveniently located than the
major airports. Moreover, general aviation terminal facilities at major airports are
usually easier to reach than airline terminals because of nearby and convenient
parking opportunities. This will normally lead to further time savings on the side of
business aviation. Working on a concrete example, the preset time values will
have to be adjusted to reflect the local characteristics.
Terminal Boarding
Terminal Boarding includes time at the ticket counter/baggage check-in, security
screening, walk to the gate position, boarding and possible waiting times. An
average value of 45 minutes is used for the airline flight. Depending on airport and
time of the day, this value may as well be exceeded. For the business aircraft,
average Terminal Boarding is set to 15 minutes (0.25 hours) due to lower time
requirements for the abovementioned procedures.
Deplaning
Deplaning includes the walk to the airline baggage claim area with typical waiting
time (generally not applicable for the business aircraft) and the walk to ground
transportation/parking facilities. Average times used are 45 minutes for the airline
and 15 minutes for the business aircraft.
83 See: PRC Aviation. (1995). p. 3-14. See: Etterich, H.-J. (2006). p. 189.
40
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
En Route
En Route times comprise the total block time, including hub transfer times for
multi-leg airline flights.
Total Travel Time
Total is the sum of Office to Airport, Terminal Boarding, En Route, Deplaning and
Airport to Office times for both outbound and return portions of the trip.
Summarizing only the set ground times (see Table 4.3) already shows a clear time
advantage of two hours in favour of the business aircraft.
Add. Out-of-Office
A row labelled Add. Out-of-Office indicates the number of business hours out of a
regular ten-hour working day (08:00 – 18:00) and outside the abovementioned
segments of total travel time, that are spent at the destination without being
directly related to the designated purpose of the trip. This is used to value
excessive time that could have been avoided by customized scheduling.
Total Valued Time (TVT)
Total Valued Time, as opposed to Total Travel Time, is the sum of all individual
travel segment times, including Add. Out-of-Office, multiplied by the respective
Cost Factors stated in Table 4.4. Total Valued Time is used as the basis for further
implicit cost calculations.
Table 4.4: En Route Productivity and Total Valued Time
Prod. Credit Cost Factor0% 100%0% 100%15% 85%75% 25%0% 100%0% 100%
50% 50%
Office to AirportTerminal Boarding
Airport to Office
En Route - Business A/CEn Route - Airline
Add.Out-of-Office
Deplaning
41
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
Prod. Credit / Cost Factor
Different Productivity Credits are assigned to the various segments of the trip to
cater for the corresponding possibility to work efficiently. For the time used to get
to and from the airport, as well as for terminal boarding and deplaning procedures,
the productivity is set to zero. As it is generally impossible to work during these
phases of the trip, the Cost Factor used to value the respective man-hours (in
terms of an implicit cost) is 100%.
But how much work can be accomplished while travelling en route in a commercial
airliner or a business aircraft? As already stated in Chapter 2.6.2, the productivity
of employees aboard a business aircraft is much higher than aboard a commercial
airliner. The possibility and willingness to productively use this considerable part of
the total trip time needs to be credited. An En Route Productivity Factor was
initially introduced by the National Business Aviation Association, Inc. (NBAA) in
its Management Aids article “The Management Accountability Factor”, providing a
quantifiable answer to the question. The En Route Productivity Credit for the time
spent aboard a business aircraft is estimated at 75 percent, whereas the value of
time travelled on a commercial airliner is estimated to be as low as 15 percent.
Thereby, the resulting Cost Factor for airline en route time84 is 85%. For the en
route time aboard a business aircraft a Cost Factor of 25% is applied.85
Differences regarding the aircraft types used (turboprop or jet) as expressed in the
Louis Harris Poll (see Figure 2.4) are not reflected in this model.
Additional out-of-office hours at the destination, resulting from rarely optimal
schedules are credited with 50%, as opposed to 15% for airline en route and 75%
for business aircraft en route. The reason for this valuation is that full privacy and
an office-like environment, as provided on a business aircraft, cannot be
guaranteed when spending idle time at the destination outside the planned
business. However, possible availability of hotel rooms, lounges or even company
facilities in combination with modern communication technology may still allow a
considerable amount of work to be achieved.
84 Actual en route time for commercial airlines also includes possible hub transfer times. 85 See: Wells, A., Chadbourne, B. (2003). p. 182.
42
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
Concerning the handling of overnight stays, it is rather impossible to find a
monetary equivalent for additional after-office hours spent away from home.
Evaluation and weighting of these criteria is strongly dependent on the employee’s
position within the company and has to be performed on an individual bases.
4.4.2 Cost Calculation
Another Excel table (Table 4.5) is created to perform the respective cost
calculations. In this table, the explicit costs of travel and the number of passengers
travelling have to be entered.86 A value per man-hour will be calculated as the Key
Performance Indicator for the economic efficiency. The variables and formulas
used to perform the respective calculations are explained in this chapter.
Table 4.5: Cost Calculation Table
per pax per trip per pax per tripAir ServiceLodgingPer DiemsOther
0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 €
0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 €0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 €
0.00 €
#Pax
Airline Business A/CRouting Routing
Total Trip CostPersonnel Cost Diff.
Average Break-EvenVMH (Airline - TP)
Total Explicit Cost
Total Explicit Cost (TEC)
In the first part of the table, the Total Explicit Cost of travel is calculated by adding
the Air Service fares, Lodging costs, Per Diems, and Other costs (e.g. rental car,
taxi). Furthermore, the number of passengers needs to be indicated. For the
business aircraft the air service fare per trip is entered, as this fare is fixed
independent of the number of passengers. On the airline side, the individual ticket
86 Entries are required for the coloured fields only.
43
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
price is required. Total air service fare per trip will increase with increasing number
of passengers.
Personnel Cost Difference (PCD)
Personnel Cost Difference (PCD) is the implicit employee cost or opportunity cost
caused by performing the travel. PCD (per passenger) is defined as the product of
an Average Break-Even VMH (VMHBE ) and the Total Valued Time (TVT),
specified before in the time calculation table.
PCDA = VMHBE * TVTA and PCDB = VMHBE * TVTB 87
The variable name contains the word “difference” to indicate that the respective
implicit personnel costs are based on VMHBE, in order to achieve a break-even in
Total Trip Cost for airline and business aircraft.
Average Break-Even VMH (VMHBE)
An Average Break-Even VMH is calculated for which Total Trip Cost Airline (TTCA)
equals Total Trip Cost Business A/C (TTCB).
per pax per trip per pax per tripAirline Business Aircraft
Total Trip Cost
TTCA = TTCB
Total Trip Cost (TTC) is the sum of Total Explicit Cost and Personnel Cost
Difference (see Table 4.5).
TECA + PCDA = TECB + PCDB
87 The subscript “A” relates to Airline, while the subscript “B” stands for Business Aircraft.
44
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
Substituting PCDA and PCDB with the underlying calculations, the equation will
look the following:
TECA + (VMHBE * TVTA) = TECB + (VMHBE * TVTB)
When solving the equation for the Average Break-Even VMH (VMHBE) the
resulting formula is:
TECB – TECATVTA – TVTB
VMHBE =
To evaluate the result, an Actual Average VMH of all travelling employees needs
to be calculated.
n
∑ VMH ii = 1
; where n = Number of passengers.n
Actual Average VMH =
As soon as the Actual Average VMH of the travellers is greater than the Average
Break-Even VMH (VMHBE), the business aircraft is the more economic option.
If Actual Average VMH of the travellers is above the determined VMHBE for both
business turboprop and jet, the next question to be answered is which of the two
options is the most suitable. A jet will yield bigger time savings, but higher hourly
rates have to be paid. Another VMH value can be calculated, for which Total Trip
Cost Business Turboprop (TTCTP) equals Total Trip Cost Business Jet (TTCJet).
per pax per trip per pax per tripBusiness TP Business Jet
Total Trip Cost
45
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
Applying the same logic as above, the resulting formula for this Average Break-
Even VMH (VMH (Jet – TP)) reads:
VMH(Jet – TP) = TECJet – TECTPTVTTP – TVTJet
Where cost is a trade-off against time, several other factors must be considered as
well: the emergency need for travel to be accomplished, the perishable nature or
deterioration rate of a situation, and any seasonal demand requirements.88 With
regard to certain maintenance or servicing contracts this could as well mean that a
company may require professional specialist teams to move quickly and thereby
prevent an excessive loss of production. Potential contractual penalties for undue
delays are additional time related costs that may have to be credited. As these
factors are strongly dependent on the specific case, they will not be reflected in the
following analysis. A separate evaluation has to be performed on an individual
basis.
88 See: Wells, A., Chadbourne, B. (2003). p. 188.
46
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
5 Sample Route Calculations
Sample time and cost calculations are performed for three selected airline round-
trips to European business destinations that showed a lack of supply according to
the previously conducted airline schedule analysis. The airport of Düsseldorf
(DUS) will be used as the origin for all airline flights. To obtain comparable results
for routes representing different flight ranges, the regional airport of
Essen/Mühlheim (ESS) - located about 27 km from DUS89 - is used as the flight
origin for the comparative business aviation calculations.
The model described before will be used to elaborate the required minimum VMH
that will make the use of a business aircraft economically favourable.
5.1 Selected Sample Destinations
The selected sample destinations used and the average ranges from DUS/ESS
are:90
1. Oulu, Finland (OUL) ~ 1,850 km
2. Vilnius, Lithuania (VNO) ~ 1,287 km
3. Katowice, Poland (KTW) ~ 865 km
To outline the general relevance of the selected business destinations, only a
short description of the economic characteristics is provided. To specifically
identify the most valuable O&Ds for specific German regions and airports, further
research will be required.
89 Distance derived from www.viamichelin.de 90 The specified distances are averaged great circle distances from DUS/ESS to the destinations,
calculated with the use of “Great Circle Mapper” (http://gc.kls2.com/) and do no concur with actual
flight distances.
47
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
1. Oulu, Finland
The two main business centres in Finland are the triangle Helsinki-Turku-Tampere
and the region around Oulu. The high-tech city of Oulu is mainly known for its
Information and Communications Technology industries. Currently, Nokia is the
biggest private employer, employing more than 4,500 people in the Oulu region.
Nokia has established two divisions, Nokia Networks and Nokia Mobile Phones, a
separate Nokia Ventures Organisation, and an internal research unit, Nokia
Research Centre.91
2. Vilnius, Lithuania
Vilnius is the capital of Lithuania. After the country had joined the European Union
in May 2004, the economic relations to Germany were intensified and are still
expected to grow. Meanwhile, Germany is, behind Russia, Lithuania’s most
important trading partner. E.ON-Ruhrgas, Siemens and Nord/LB, the third-largest
German bank, as well as many small and medium-sized enterprises have made
large investments in Lithuania.92
3. Katowice, Poland
Katowice is one of the most important business centres in Poland and the main
city of the Upper Silesian Industry Area. The region is shifting more and more from
traditional coal mining and iron and steel industries towards information technology
and electrical engineering (e.g. Electrolux). Besides, the largest car manufacturers
in Poland (e.g. Opel) can be found in the Katowice Special Economic Zone.93
91 See: City of Oulu (2006). 92 See: Auswärtiges Amt (2006). 93 See: The Śląskie Voivodeship (2006). See: Katowice Special Economic Zone (2006).
48
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
5.2 Basic Assumptions
The following assumptions have been made to perform the calculations for the
selected sample trips:
1. Purpose of the generic business trips is to attend a three-hour meeting at
the destination, scheduled on Thursday from 12:30 to 15:30 local time.
Arrivals and departures are planned to minimize total travel time and cost.
2. Origin for all sample airline flights is Düsseldorf International (DUS).
3. Origin for all sample business aircraft flights is the Airport of
Essen/Mühlheim (ESS). Possible positioning flights are not included.
4. Business Turboprop used is a Beech King Air B200. Business Jet used is
a Citation Jet.
5. Airline schedules and fares for Vilnius and Katowice were obtained from
the Lufthansa website.94 For the destination Oulu, the website of Finnair95
was used, as no Lufthansa connection to Oulu is available. Bookings were
checked against listings on the opodo website (www.opodo.de) to assure
that the best available connection is chosen.
6. Airline fares are based on business class bookings. Bookings were made
one week in advance to guarantee availability of flights.
7. Schedules and fares for business aircraft are based on actual air charter
company quotations.
8. Lodging cost and per diems are derived from current travel expense
compensation tables published by the German Ministry of Finance.96
While all the trips with business aircraft can be achieved within one day, the
comparable airline trips may require up to two overnight stays. Screenshots of the
airline bookings for the sample routes are available in Appendix 5.
94 www.lufthansa.com 95 www.finnair.com 96 See: Bundesministerium der Finanzen. (2004)
49
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
5.3 Route 1: Oulu, Finland
Airline Schedule:97
STD STA STD STA DurationWednesday DUS 11:30 15:00 HEL 16:00 17:05 OUL 04:35
STD STA STD STA DurationFriday OUL 06:00 07:00 HEL 07:35 09:00 DUS 04:00
Airline Travel requires a departure on Wednesday at 11:30 lcl (one day early). The
returning flight leaves Oulu at 06:00 lcl on Friday (one day late) and arrives in
Düsseldorf at 09:00 lcl. Both ways one transfer in Helsinki is required.
Business aviation schedules are custom-fit to avoid idle times at the destination
and provide a direct “There-and-Back in-a-Day” option.
Schedule Business Turboprop: 98
STD STA DurationThursday ESS 06:20 11:30 OUL 04:10
STD STA DurationThursday OUL 16:30 19:40 ESS 04:10
Schedule Business Jet: STD STA Duration
Thursday ESS 07:10 11:30 OUL 03:20
STD STA DurationThursday OUL 16:30 18:50 ESS 03:20
Total Trip Duration:
Airline: 48:30 hrs (including two overnight stays)
Business Turboprop: 15:20 hrs
Business Jet: 13:40 hrs 97 See Appendix 5/1. 98 For the Turboprop Crew, a possibility to rest will be required in Oulu to meet the Crew Duty Time
specifications according to 2. DV LuftBO (§ 3 and § 5). See: http://www.luftrecht-online.de/
regelwerke/pdf/2dvluftbo.pdf
50
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
Total Travel Times and Total Valued Times are summed up as shown in Table 5.1
below. As the airline flight arrives the day before and leaves the day after the
actual business day, the idle time on Thursday from 08:00 lcl to 12:30 lcl and from
15:30 lcl to 18:00 lcl is counted as Add. Out-of-Office time.
Table 5.1: Time Comparison Route 1 (Oulu, Finland)
Airline Business TP Business JetOutboundOffice to Airport 0.75 0.75 0.75Terminal Boarding 0.75 0.25 0.25En Route 4.58 4.17 3.33Deplaning 0.75 0.25 0.25Airport to Office 0.75 0.75 0.75
Total Outbound 7.58 6.17 5.33
ReturnOffice to Airport 0.75 0.75 0.75Terminal Boarding 0.75 0.25 0.25En Route 4.00 4.17 3.33Deplaning 0.75 0.25 0.25Airport to Office 0.75 0.75 0.75
Total Return 7.00 6.17 5.33
Total Travel Time 14.58 12.34 10.66
Add. Out-of-Office 7.00 0.00 0.00
Total Valued Time 16.79 6.09 5.67
Elapsed Time (hrs)
The individual business class ticket price for the Finnair flight to Oulu and back is
€ 1,349,56. The total air charter fares for the roundtrip are € 12,850 for the
turboprop and € 13,500 for the jet. Table 5.2 and Table 5.3 below show the
resulting Average Break-Even VMH values for three passengers. For the business
turboprop the required Average Break-Even VMH is € 241.11. With € 251.48 the
VMHBE for the business jet is only slightly higher.
51
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
Table 5.2: Cost Comparison Airline vs. Business TP: Oulu, Finland (3 pax)
per pax per trip per pax per tripAir Service 1,349.56 € 4,048.68 € 4,283.33 € 12,850.00 €Lodging 240.00 € 720.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 €Per Diems 126.00 € 378.00 € 14.00 € 42.00 €Other 0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 €
1,715.56 € 5,146.68 € 4,297.33 € 12,892.00 €
4,048.91 € 12,146.73 € 1,467.14 € 4,401.41 €5,764.47 € 17,293.41 € 5,764.47 € 17,293.41 €Total Trip Cost
3
Personnel Cost Diff.
Average Break-EvenVMH (Airline - TP)
Total Explicit Cost
#Pax
Airline Business TPDUS-OUL-DUS ESS-OUL-ESS
241.11 €
Table 5.3: Cost Comparison Airline vs. Business Jet: Oulu, Finland (3 pax)
per pax per trip per pax per tripAir Service 1,349.56 € 4,048.68 € 4,500.00 € 13,500.00 €Lodging 240.00 € 720.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 €Per Diems 126.00 € 378.00 € 14.00 € 42.00 €Other 0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 €
1,715.56 € 5,146.68 € 4,514.00 € 13,542.00 €
4,223.06 € 12,669.18 € 1,424.62 € 4,273.86 €5,938.62 € 17,815.86 € 5,938.62 € 17,815.86 €
#Pax
Airline
Average Break-EvenVMH (Airline - Jet)
3
Personnel Cost Diff.Total Trip Cost
Total Explicit Cost
DUS-OUL-DUS ESS-OUL-ESS
251.48 €
Business Jet
Based on the productivity factors shown in Table 4.2, an average traveller salary
of € 46,000, equal to a VMH of € 253.99, would already meet the criteria for the
use of both business turboprop and jet.
Figure 5.1 shows the remaining Average Break-Even VMH values for other
passenger numbers. The values obviously decrease with increasing passenger
number. If the Actual Average VMH of the passengers is above the line, the use of
52
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
the specified business aircraft is economically justified. For eight passengers, the
indicated value for the turboprop is zero. This indicates that already the Total
Explicit Costs of the airline trip exceed those of the business turboprop option.
Figure 5.1: Average Break-Even VMH Values (Oulu, Finland)
0100200300400500600700800900
1,0001,100
No. of Passengers
VM
H in
EU
R
Av. VMH (TP-Airl.) 1041 441 241 141 81 41 13 0Av. VMH (Jet-Airl.) 1060 454 251 150 90
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
53
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
5.4 Route 2: Vilnius, Lithuania
Airline Schedule:99
STD STA STD STA DurationWednesday DUS 17:25 19:05 WAW 19:55 22:20 VNO 03:55
STD STA STD STA DurationThursday VNO 18:20 19:30 FRA 21:05 21:50 DUS 04:30
Airline Travel to Vilnius requires a departure on Wednesday at 17:25 lcl (one day
early) and includes one transfer in Warsaw. The return flight via Frankfurt leaves
Vilnius at 18:20 lcl on Thursday and arrives in Düsseldorf at 21:50 lcl.
Business aviation schedules are custom-fit to avoid idle times at the destination
and provide a direct “There-and-Back in-a-Day” option.
Schedule Business Turboprop: STD STA Duration
Thursday ESS 07:30 11:30 VNO 03:00
STD STA DurationThursday VNO 16:30 18:30 ESS 03:00
Schedule Business Jet: STD STA Duration
Thursday ESS 08:05 11:30 VNO 02:25
STD STA DurationThursday VNO 16:30 17:55 ESS 02:25
Total Trip Duration:
Airline: 31:25 hrs (including one overnight stay)
Business Turboprop: 13:00 hrs
Business Jet: 11:50 hrs
99 See Appendix 5/2.
54
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
Total Travel Times and Total Valued Times are summed up as shown in Table 5.4
below. For the airline flight an Add. Out-of-Office time is counted on Thursday from
08:00 lcl to 12:30 lcl and from 15:30 lcl to 16:50 lcl (90 minutes prior STD).
Table 5.4: Time Comparison Route 2 (Vilnius, Lithuania)
Airline Business TP Business JetOutboundOffice to Airport 0.75 0.75 0.75Terminal Boarding 0.75 0.25 0.25En Route 3.92 3.00 2.42Deplaning 0.75 0.25 0.25Airport to Office 0.75 0.75 0.75
Total Outbound 6.92 5.00 4.42
ReturnOffice to Airport 0.75 0.75 0.75Terminal Boarding 0.75 0.25 0.25En Route 4.50 3.00 2.42Deplaning 0.75 0.25 0.25Airport to Office 0.75 0.75 0.75
Total Return 7.50 5.00 4.42
Total Travel Time 14.42 10.00 8.84
Add. Out-of-Office 6.67 0.00 0.00
Total Valued Time 16.49 5.50 5.21
Elapsed Time (hrs)
The individual business class ticket price for the Lufthansa flight to Vilnius and
back is € 1,709.62. The total air charter fares for the roundtrip are € 9,450 for the
turboprop and € 10,250 for the jet. Table 5.5 and Table 5.6 below show the
resulting Average Break-Even VMH values for three passengers. For the business
turboprop the required Average Break-Even VMH is € 117.85. For the business jet
it is € 138.45.
55
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
Table 5.5: Cost Comparison Airline vs. Business TP: Vilnius, Lithuania (3 pax)
per pax per trip per pax per tripAir Service 1,709.62 € 5,128.86 € 3,150.00 € 9,450.00 €Lodging 100.00 € 300.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 €Per Diems 54.00 € 162.00 € 9.00 € 27.00 €Other 0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 €
1,863.62 € 5,590.86 € 3,159.00 € 9,477.00 €
1,943.54 € 5,830.62 € 648.16 € 1,944.48 €3,807.16 € 11,421.48 € 3,807.16 € 11,421.48 €
Total Explicit Cost
Personnel Cost Diff.Total Trip Cost
Average Break-EvenVMH (Airline - TP)
DUS-VNO-DUS ESS-VNO-ESS#
PaxAirline Business TP
3
117.85 €
Table 5.6: Cost Comparison Airline vs. Business Jet: Vilnius, Lithuania (3 pax)
per pax per trip per pax per tripAir Service 1,709.62 € 5,128.86 € 3,416.67 € 10,250.00 €Lodging 100.00 € 300.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 €Per Diems 54.00 € 162.00 € 9.00 € 27.00 €Other 0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 €
1,863.62 € 5,590.86 € 3,425.67 € 10,277.00 €
2,283.40 € 6,850.19 € 721.35 € 2,164.05 €4,147.02 € 12,441.05 € 4,147.02 € 12,441.05 €
Personnel Cost Diff.Total Trip Cost
DUS-VNO-DUS ESS-VNO-ESS#
PaxAirline Business Jet
3
Total Explicit Cost
Average Break-EvenVMH (Airline - Jet) 138.45 €
Based on the productivity factors shown in Table 4.2, an average traveller salary
of slightly more than € 34,000, equal to a VMH of € 138.76, would already meet
the criteria for the use of both business turboprop and jet. Applying only a
productivity factor of 5.7, as described in the PRC Aviation study (Chapter 4.1.2),
an annual average salary of € 56,000 would be sufficient.
56
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
Figure 5.2 shows the remaining Average Break-Even VMH values for other
passenger numbers. Where the Actual Average VMH of the passengers is above
the line, the use of the specified business aircraft is economically justified. For a
group of six or more passengers, the required VMHBE for the turboprop is zero.
This indicates that already the Total Explicit Costs of the airline trip exceed those
of the business turboprop option.
Figure 5.2: Average Break-Even VMH Values (Vilnius, Lithuania)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
No. of Passengers
VM
H in
EU
R
Av. VMH (TP-Airl.) 691 261 118 46 3 0 0 0Av. VMH (Jet-Airl.) 744 290 138 63 17
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
57
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
5.5 Route 3: Katowice, Poland
Airline Schedule:100
STD STA STD STA DurationWednesday DUS 20:10 21:05 FRA 21:50 23:15 KTW 03:05
STD STA STD STA DurationFriday KTW 06:00 07:30 FRA 08:50 09:35 DUS 03:35
In order to be at the scheduled business in Katowice on Thursday, the existing
airline schedule requires a departure on Wednesday at 20:10 lcl (one day early)
for an arrival at 23:15 lcl. Earliest return possibility is a departure on Friday (one
day late) at 06:00 lcl, arriving in Düsseldorf at 09:35 lcl. Both flights are transfer
connections via Frankfurt.
Business aviation schedules are custom-fit to avoid idle times at the destination
and enable a direct “There-and-Back in-a-Day” option.
Schedule Business Turboprop: STD STA Duration
Thursday ESS 09:20 11:30 KTW 02:10
STD STA DurationThursday KTW 16:30 18:40 ESS 02:10
Schedule Business Jet: STD STA Duration
Thursday ESS 09:45 11:30 KTW 01:45
STD STA DurationThursday KTW 16:30 18:15 ESS 01:45
Total Trip Duration:
Airline: 40:25 hrs (including two overnight stay)
Business Turboprop: 11:20 hrs
Business Jet: 10:30 hrs 100 See Appendix 5/3.
58
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
Total Travel Times and Total Valued Times are summed up as shown in Table 5.7
below. Add. Out-of-Office time for the airline option is counted on Thursday from
08:00 lcl to 12:30 lcl and from 15:30 lcl to 18:00 lcl.
Table 5.7: Time Comparison Route 3 (Katowice, Poland)
Airline Business TP Business JetOutboundOffice to Airport 0.75 0.75 0.75Terminal Boarding 0.75 0.25 0.25En Route 3.08 2.17 1.75Deplaning 0.75 0.25 0.25Airport to Office 0.75 0.75 0.75
Total Outbound 6.08 4.17 3.75
ReturnOffice to Airport 0.75 0.75 0.75Terminal Boarding 0.75 0.25 0.25En Route 3.58 2.17 1.75Deplaning 0.75 0.25 0.25Airport to Office 0.75 0.75 0.75
Total Return 6.58 4.17 3.75
Total Travel Time 12.66 8.34 7.50
Add. Out-of-Office 7.00 0.00 0.00
Total Valued Time 15.16 5.09 4.88
Elapsed Time (hrs)
The individual business class ticket price for the Lufthansa flight to Katowice and
back is € 1,454.79. The total air charter fares for the roundtrip are € 6,950 for the
turboprop and € 7,850 for the jet. Table 5.8 and Table 5.9 below show the
resulting Average Break-Even VMH values for a group of three passengers.
Average Break-Even VMH values required to justify the use of the business
turboprop are € 65.29 and € 93.12 for the business jet.
59
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
Table 5.8: Cost Comparison Airline vs. Business TP: Katowice, Poland (3 pax)
per pax per trip per pax per tripAir Service 1,454.79 € 4,364.37 € 2,316.67 € 6,950.00 €Lodging 140.00 € 420.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 €Per Diems 72.00 € 216.00 € 8.00 € 24.00 €Other 0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 €
1,666.79 € 5,000.37 € 2,324.67 € 6,974.00 €
989.88 € 2,969.65 € 332.01 € 996.02 €2,656.67 € 7,970.02 € 2,656.67 € 7,970.02 €
Business TP
3
DUS-KTW-DUS ESS-KTW-ESS#
PaxAirline
Total Explicit Cost
Personnel Cost Diff.Total Trip Cost
Average Break-EvenVMH (Airline - TP) 65.29 €
Table 5.9: Cost Comparison Airline vs. Business Jet: Katowice, Poland (3 pax)
per pax per trip per pax per tripAir Service 1,454.79 € 4,364.37 € 2,616.67 € 7,850.00 €Lodging 140.00 € 420.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 €Per Diems 72.00 € 216.00 € 8.00 € 24.00 €Other 0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 €
1,666.79 € 5,000.37 € 2,624.67 € 7,874.00 €
1,411.86 € 4,235.57 € 453.98 € 1,361.94 €3,078.65 € 9,235.94 € 3,078.65 € 9,235.94 €
Personnel Cost Diff.Total Trip Cost
#Pax
Airline Business Jet
Average Break-EvenVMH (Airline - Jet) 93.12 €
ESS-KTW-ESS
3
Total Explicit Cost
DUS-KTW-DUS
Based on the productivity factors shown in Table 4.2, an average traveller salary
of € 28,000 (equal to a VMH of € 94.11) would already meet the criteria for the use
of both business turboprop and jet. Even by applying the average productivity
factor of 5.7 for senior executives, as described in the PRC Aviation study
(Chapter 4.1.2), the annual salary corresponding to the Average Break-Even VMH
for the business jet will be only slightly more the € 32,000.
60
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
Figure 5.3 shows the remaining Average Break-Even VMH values for other
passenger numbers. Where the Actual Average VMH of the passengers is above
the line, the use of the specified business aircraft is economically justified. For a
group of five or more passengers, the indicated values for both turboprop and jet
are zero, indicating that already the Total Explicit Costs of the airline trip exceed
those of both business aircraft options.
Figure 5.3: Average Break-Even VMH Values (Katowice, Poland)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
No. of Passengers
VM
H in
EU
R
Av. VMH (TP-Airl.) 525 180 65 8 0 0 0 0Av. VMH (Jet-Airl.) 602 220 93 30 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
61
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
5.6 What Type of Business Aircraft to Choose?
To perform the sample route calculations, one turboprop and one turbojet aircraft
were examined as a possible alternative to commercial airline travel. As expected,
the VMHBE values for the jet are higher than those of the turboprop. However, the
gap between the respective values decreases with increasing flight ranges. The
greater the distance that has to be covered, the more time can be saved by higher
cruising speeds. These shortened flight times will eventually compensate the
higher rates that have to be paid for the jet, and the total air charter fare will drop
below the one that is charged for the turboprop aircraft. For the aircraft types
(Beech King Air B200, Cessna 525 Citation Jet) and the flight ranges (less than
2,000 km) evaluated in the examples before, this point has not been reached yet.
On all three routes, the turboprop is still cheaper than the jet, producing lower
VMHBE values.
The VMHBE values required to close the mentioned gap and turn the still higher
priced business jet into the cheaper option are shown in Figure 5.4 below.
Figure 5.4: Average Break-Even VMH for Choice between Business A/C Types
0400800
1,2001,6002,0002,4002,8003,2003,6004,0004,400
No. of Passengers
Brea
k-Ev
en V
MH
in E
UR
Av. VMH (Jet-TP) OUL 1548 774 516 387 310Av. VMH (Jet-TP) VNO 2759 1379 920 690 552Av. VMH (Jet-TP) KTW 4286 2143 1429 1071 857
1 2 3 4 5
62
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
Only if Actual Average VMH of the travellers is above the line, the business jet will
be more cost-effective. The lowest values are shown for the longest route, where
the time savings are most dominant.
This does not consider the subjective quality perception of the customer,
concerning travel comfort or safety with regard to turboprops or jets. Where both
options are more economical than airline travel, personal preferences may as well
be a decision criteria for the choice of the respective business aircraft type.
63
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
6 Conclusion
The potential use of business aircraft is based on their ability to make travel more
efficient by reducing total travel time and increasing productivity for the given
amount of time. Business aircraft are more flexible than airlines because they fly
according to a self-determined schedule, quite often closer to the ultimate
destination of the business traveller. Business aviation is the real point-to-point
form of air travel, able to fill the large existing gaps in scheduled airline services:
most business flights are between cities that are not adequately or not at all
served by scheduled flights.
Business aircraft are productivity multipliers that allow passengers to conduct
business en route in complete privacy while reducing the stresses associated with
travelling on scheduled carriers. While flying with an airline, business basically
stops. But the “office in the sky” in a business aircraft means business as usual,
with confidential in-flight meetings and briefings with clients or associates.
Business aviation is not about taking top managers from the head offices of large
corporations and flying them in “their own aircraft”. The Louis Harris Poll stated
that only 14% of company employees travelling on board business aircraft were
top management. Another 14% were senior managers, 49% middle managers and
19% professional staff.101 The sample route calculations performed in Chapter 5
as well proved that there is a great saving potential for small groups of lower
salaried employees, especially on the shorter routes. This basically relates to the
fact that airline ticket prices, other than air charter prices, are not necessarily
dependant on flight ranges.
Overall, commercial business aviation is for sure a valuable alternative for
companies in Germany. Simply stated, business aviation can help a company to
obtain maximum productivity from its two most important assets - people and time.
This makes it a commercial proposition, not a luxury. The proposition however is
101 Louis Harris & Associates, Inc. (1997). p. 5.
64
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
based on a comprehensive valuation of employee time as an implicit part of travel
expenses.
Many of the large corporations in Germany already have inherited these thoughts
and acknowledge the benefits of business aviation by operating own corporate
fleets. Independent of company size or travel volume, commercial business
aviation can provide the same benefits on demand, without the need for long-term
financial or contractual commitments.
The model developed in this thesis is an easy to use tool to evaluate the financial
benefits, arising from the use of commercial air charter flights on an individual trip
basis. However, it requires that companies appreciate their employees’ time as a
valuable good that must not be wasted. For the three sample routes evaluated in
this thesis, the Total Valued Time savings per passenger resulting from the use of
a business aircraft were at least 10 hours (i.e. one complete working day) per trip.
In other words, using the airline to perform the trip (for employees meeting the
VMH criteria) would be a waste of valuable resources that cannot be tolerated by a
profit organisation. On top of the pure micro-economic evaluation, the non-
financial factors, e.g. non-business hours away from home (family time) that can
influence employee motivation and loyalty should be given a thought.
The sample calculations were based on an artificial scenario. The results will be
even more meaningful, when the model is applied to a specific company case.
Again, honouring these benefits requires a comprehensive valuation of employee
time. Especially in Germany, personnel costs are a major cost factor. Companies
must, at least, recognize the opportunity cost of reduced productivity when
calculating the full amount of travel expenses incurred.
65
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
Areas for further research
Based on the European airline schedule analysis performed in Chapter 3 of this
thesis, an economic research can be conducted for specific German origin
airports. The aim should be to identify companies within the catchment area that
maintain business ties to the “blank spots” as shown in the synoptic tables
(Appendix 4). By analysing the travel behaviour of these companies and then
applying the cost-benefit model to the specific cases, the respective companies
may be convinced of the saving potential inherent to business aviation.
In a next step, for companies with higher travel demands, a cost-benefit model
may be developed to determine the minimum amount of business travel required
to justify the operation of own corporate aircraft.
66
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
References
Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher Verkehrslughäfen (2005). ADV-Jahresstatistik
2004. 1st ed.. Berlin: ADV (Ed.).
Aircraft Charter World (2006). Homepage. Available from: <http://www.aircraft-
charter-world.com/index.htm> [Accessed 26 May 2006]
Arthur Andersen LLP (2001). Business Aviation in Today’s Economy: A guide to
the analysis of business aircraft use, benefits and effects on shareholder
value. The White Paper Series. Number 9. Available from: <http://web.nbaa.
org/public/news/stats/AndersenPart02.PDF>[Accessed 05 June 2006]
Auswärtiges Amt (2006). Bilateral Relations: Lithuania. Homepage. Available from:
<http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/diplo/en/Laender/Lithuania.html>
[Accessed: 10 July 2006]
Brown, S. et al. (2001). Operations Management: Policy, Practice and
Performance Improvement. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Bundesministerium der Finanzen (2004). Übersicht über die ab 1. Januar 2005
geltenden Pauschbeträge für Verpflegungsmehraufwendungen und
Übernachtungskosten. Available from: <http://www.bundesfinanzministerium.
de/lang_de/DE/Service/Downloads/Abt__IV/BMF__Schreiben/041,templateId
=raw,property=publicationFile.pdf> [Accessed 12 June 2006]
Case, K., Fair, R. (2004). Principles of Economics. 7th ed.. Upper Saddle River,
N.J.: Prentice Hall.
City of Oulu (2006). Information about Oulu. Homepage. Available from:
<http://oulu.ouka.fi/city/english/> [Accessed: 08 July 2006]
Delwiche, L., Slaughter, J. (2003). The Little SAS Book: A Primer. 3rd ed. Cary,
NC: SAS Institute Inc.
di Piazza, K. (2004). Air Taxi - Myth or New Market Niche? Available from: <http://
www.rsvpair.com/pages/dipiazza1> [Accessed 16 June 2006]
Eclipse Aviation Corp. (2006). Eclipse 500. Homepage. Available from:
<http://www.eclipseaviation.com/eclipse_500/> [Accessed 16 June 2006]
67
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
Ehrenberg, R., Smith, R. (2006). Modern Labour Economics: Theory and Public
Policy. 9th ed.. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
Etterich, H.-J. (2006). Wirtschaftlichkeit und Grenzen des Geschäftsreiseverkehrs.
Available from: <http://www.bwl.tu-darmstadt.de/bwl2/akl/downloads/kolloqu
ien/%5Bakl10%5D%20-%20etterich.pdf> [Accessed: 26 May 2006]
EUROCONTROL (2006). Getting to the point: Business Aviation in Europe.
EUROCONTROL Trends in Traffic, Vol. 1. Available from: <http://www.euro
control.int/statfor/public/site_preferences/Business%20Aviation%20Study%20
Doc176%20v1.0%20FINAL.pdf> [Accessed 02 June 2006]
Figgen, A. (2006). Kurzfristig Höchstpreise. Aero International, No. 5, May 2006,
p. 44 - 56.
Fitz-enz, J. (2000). The ROI of Human Capital: Measuring the Economic Value of
Employee Performance. New York: AMACOM.
Flug Revue (2006). Homepage. Available from: <http://www.flug-revue.rotor.com/
FRtypen/FRCitJet.htm> [Accessed: 13 June 2006]
Focus. (2003). Der Markt für Urlaubs- und Geschäftsreisen: Daten, Fakten,Trends.
Munich: FOCUS Magazin Verlag GmbH.
Han, J., Kamber, M. (2001). Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques. San
Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
HSH Nordbank AG (2005). Business Jets: Market, Operator Models, Owners,
Market Trends, Secondary Market. Sector Report. March 2005. Available
from: <http://www.hsh-nordbank.com/home/themen/presse/publikationen/bran
chenstudien/transport/SectorReportBusinessJets0305.pdf;jsessionid=GQqHr
WQ18mTFpnJwBTJ8v8QpQQV11BSHmg6zgPP7bqL8WL2F1qp3!-15904055
25> [Accessed: 31 May 2006]
Horngren, C. et al. (2005). Management and Cost Accounting. 3rd ed.. Madrid:
Prentice Hall.
IATA (1998). IATA Standard Schedule Information Manual. February 1998,
Quebec.
68
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
IBAC (2000). Business Aviation: Position Paper Concerning the Development of
JAR OPS 2. Available from: <http://www.ibac.org/Library/ElectF/saft/jar_ops_
paper.htm> [Accessed: 09 June 2006]
JAA (2006). JAR-OPS 1: Commercial Air Transportation (Aeroplanes). Section 1.
Amendment 10; eff. 1 March 2006. Available from: <http://www.jaa.nl/publicati
ons/jars/563242.pdf> [Accessed 04 June 2006]
Katowice Special Economic Zone (2006). Homepage. Available from:
<http://www.ksse.com.pl/index-eng.html> [Accessed: 09 July 2006]
Loshin, D. (2003). Business Intelligence: The Savvy Manager’s Guide. San
Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
Louis Harris and Associates, Inc. (1997). Survey of Companies Using Turbine-
Powered General Aviation Aircraft for Business Transportation. Study No.
718235. Available from: <http://web.nbaa.org/public/news/stats/louis_harris_
poll.pdf> [Accessed: 30 May 2006]
Maurer, P. (2003). Luftverkehrsmanagement: Basiswissen. 3rd ed.. München:
Oldenbourg.
NetJets (2006). Costs. Homepage. Available from: <http://www.netjets.com/The
%20NetJets%20Program/cost.asp> Accessed: [10 July 2006]
Paauwe, J. (2004). HRM and Performance: Achieving Long Term Viability. New
York: Oxford University Press.
Pompl, W. (2002). Luftverkehr: Eine ökonomische und politische Einführung. 4th
ed.. Berlin: Springer.
PRC Aviation (1995). Business Aircraft Operations: Financial Benefits and
Intangible Advantages. A study accomplished for GAMA, Inc. and NBAA, Inc.
Available from: <http://web.nbaa.org/public/news/stats/financial_benefits.pdf>
[Accessed 08 June 2006]
Raytheon Aircraft Company (2006). Beechcraft King Air B200. Homepage.
Available from: <http://www.raytheonaircraft.com/beechcraft/aircraft/turbo
props/kab200/> [Accessed 15 June 2006]
69
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
Sterzenbach, R., Conrady, R. (2003). Luftverkehr: Betriebswirtschaftliches Lehr-
und Handbuch. 3rd ed.. München: Oldenbourg.
The Śląskie Voivodeship (2006). Economic Potential. Homepage. Available from:
<http://gospodarka.silesia-region.pl/en/gosp2.php> [Accessed: 09 July 2006]
Verband Deutsches Reisemanagement e.V. (2005). VDR-Geschäftsreiseanalyse
2005 in Zusammenarbeit mit BearingPoint. Frankfurt: VDR (Ed.).
Wells, A., Chadbourne, B. (2003). General Aviation Marketing and Management.
2nd ed.. Malabar: Krieger Publishing Company.
Wieczkowski, M. (1999). Alternatives to Merging SAS Databases ... But Be
Careful. NESUG 1999. Available from: <http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/SAS/
library/nesug99/bt150.pdf> [Accessed 08 June 2006]
70
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
Appendix 1/1Appendices
Commercial Air Charter Companies in Germany 102
Name Internet
Bizair Fluggesellschaft mbH 10589 Berlin www.bizair.de
Windrose Air Jetcharter GmbH 12101 Berlin www.windroseair.de
Private Wings Flugcharter GmbH 12521 Berlin www.private-wings.de
Canair Luftfahrtunternehmen 20345 Hamburg www.canair.de
ACH Hamburg 22297 Hamburg www.ach-hamburg.de
earlybirds Jet Charter Company GmbH & Co. KG 22335 Hamburg www.early-birds.de
atec Flugcharter KG 24159 Kiel - Flughafen Süd www.atec-flight.com
FLM Aviation LuftverkehrsgesellschaftMohrdieck mbH & Co. KG 24159 Kiel - Flughafen www.flm-aviation.de
ohlair 24159 Kiel www.ohlair.de
Hanseatic Aviation 25474 Ellerbeck www.hanseaticaviation.de
Jet Kontor 25488 Hamburg-Holm www.jetkontor.de
Luftverkehr Friesland Harle 26409 Wittmund-Carolinensiel www.inselflieger.de
FLN Frisia-Luftverkehr GmbH Norddeich 26506 Norden www.reederei-frisia.de
OLT Ostfriesische Lufttransport GmbH 26721 Emden www.olt.de
Atlas Air Service GmbH 27777 Ganderkesee www.atlas-air-service.de
Silver Bird Charterflug GmbH 28199 Bremen www.silverbirdcharter.com
Aerowest GmbH 30669 Hannover www.aerowest.aero
Advance Air GmbH 35789 Weilmünster www.advanceair.de
JET EXECUTIVE International Air CharterGmbH & Co. KG 40472 Düsseldorf www.jetexecutive.com
Air Traffic GmbH Executive Jet Service 40474 Düsseldorf www.airtraffic.de
Triple Alpha GmbH 40474 Düsseldorf www.3A-online.de
Vibro Air Flugservice GmbH & Co. KG 41066 Mönchengladbach www.vibroair.de
Westavia Fluggesellschaft mbH 41066 Mönchengladbach www.westavia.de
LGW-Luftfahrtgesellschaft Walter mbH 44319 Dortmund www.lgw.de
VHM Schul- und Charterflug GmbH 45470 Mühlheim/Ruhr www.vhm.aero
MSR Flug-Charter GmbH 48268 Greven www.msr-flug.de
Excellent Air AG 48703 Stadtlohn www.excellent-air.com
CCF manager airline GmbH 51147 Köln www.jetcharter.de
Senator Aviation Charter GmbH 51147 Köln www.senator-aviation.de
WDL Aviation GmbH & Co. KG 51147 Köln www.wdl-aviation.de
Location
102 Source: Adapted from Figgen, A. (2006). p. 46 et seqq.
71
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
Appendix 1/2
Commercial Air Charter Companies in Germany 103
Name Internet
AirGO Flugservice GmbH & Co. KG 55126 Mainz-Finthen www.airgo.de
Air Alliance Express AG & Co. KG 57299 Burbach www.air-alliance.de
Avanti Air GmbH & Co. KG 57299 Burbach www.avantiair.com
JetConnection Businessflight AG 60549 Frankfurt www.jetconnection.com
Hahn Air Lines GmbH 63303 Dreieich www.hahnair.com
AERO Business Charter GmbH 64625 Bensheim www.aerobusiness.de
Cirrus Aviation Luftfahrtgesellschaft mbH 66131 Saarbrücken www.cirrus-aviation.de
Silver Cloud Air GmbH 67346 Speyer www.silver-cloud-air.de
transavia Fluggesellschaft 67346 Speyer www.transaviaflug.de
DaimlerChrysler Aviation 70567 Stuttgart www.dc-aviation.com
EFD Eisele Flugdienst GmbH 70629 Stuttgart-Flughafen www.eisele-flugdienst.de
Rieker Air service GmbH 70629 Stuttgart-Flughafen www.riekerairservice.de
Stuttgarter Flugdienst GmbH 70629 Stuttgart-Flughafen www.stuttgarterflugdienst.de
Jetline Fluggesellschaft mbH & Co. KG 70794 Filderstadt www.jetline.aero
ProAir-Charter-Transport GmbH 70794 Filderstadt www.proair.de
ACM Air Charter Luftverkehrsgesellschaft mbH 77836 Rheinmünster www.acm-air-charter.de
flugbereitschaft GmbH 77836 Rheinmünster www.flugbereitschaft.com
Business Air GmbH 78166 Donaueschingen www.business-air-gmbh.de
Dr. Schenk Flugbetrieb GmbH 82152 Planegg www.vip-flights.de
CPI Air Service GmbH Carlos de Pilar 82166 Gräfelfing www.cpi-airservice.com
Phoenix Air GmbH 85326 München www.phoenixair.de
Air Independance GmbH 85356 München www.airindependence.com
Comfort Air Luftfahrtunternehmen GmbH & Co.KG 85356 München www.privatejets.de
Premium Aviation GmbH 85356 München www.premium-aviation.de
Augusta Air 86169 Augsburg www.augusta-air.de
FoxAir GmbH 86167 Augsburg www.foxair.de
Donau-Air-Service GmbH 88512 Mengen www.donauair.de
Aero-Dienst GmbH & Co. KG 90411 Nürnberg www.aero-dienst.de
Jetair Flug GmbH 90411 Nürnberg www.jetair.de
ALPHA EXEC Flugbetriebs GmbH 91126 Schwabach www.alpha-exec.de
Comair Reise und Charter GmbH 94474 Vilshofen www.BergerBau.de
mediair ambulanzflugdienst 94501 Aidenbach www.mediair.de
Air Charter Picard Flugzeugvercharterung 97901 Altenbuch www.air-charter-picard.de
Fly Point Flugservice Haufe KG 99819 Hörselberg www.fly-point.de
Location
List may not be exhaustive.
103 Source: Adapted from Figgen, A. (2006). p. 46 et seqq.
72
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
Appendix 2
Air Charter Brokers in Germany104
Name Internet
Chapman Freeborn Airmarketing GmbH 12521 Berlin www.chapman-freeborn.de
Nordavia Fluggesellschaft mbH 20144 Hamburg www.nordavia.de
Air Partner GmbH 22453 Hamburg www.airpartner.com
FlightTime GmbH 27721 Ritterhude www.flighttime.de
Hellmann Air Charter 30669 Hannover www.hellmann.net
Air Traffic Euro Charter GmbH 40474 Düsseldorf www.airtraffic.de
Hunt & Palmer International 50353 Hürth www.huntpalmer.co.uk
Pro Sky Airbroker GmbH 50667 Köln www.clickajet.de
open sky air charter services GmbH 51147 Köln www.open-sky.com
Air Charter Agency 53859 Niederkassel www.charteragency.de
airport-broker aircharter 53859 Niederkassel www.airport-broker.de
Aviation Broker GmbH 60313 Frankfurt www.aviation-broker.de
Executive Jet 63110 Rodgau www.executive-jet.de
Panda Flight Management GmbH 63329 Egelsbach www.panda-flight.de
ProAir-Charter-Transport GmbH 64546 Mörfelden-Walldorf www.proair.de
Global Flight Flugdienst GmbH 70629 Stuttgart [email protected] (email)
EBAS International GmbH 85356 München www.ebas-international.de
Location
List may not be exhaustive.
104 Source: Adapted from Figgen, A. (2006). p. 56.
73
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
Appendix 3/1
Listing of German Airports in Germany 105
International Airports 106
Town Airport name ICAO IATA Rwy length (feet)Berlin Schönefeld EDDB SXF 9,800Berlin Tegel EDDT TXL 9,900Berlin Tempelhof EDDI THF 6,800Bremen Bremen EDDW BRE 6,600Cologne-Bonn Cologne-Bonn EDDK CGN 12,500Dortmund Wickede EDLW DTM 4,700Dresden Dresden EDDC DRS 8,200Düsseldorf Düsseldorf EDDL DUS 9,800Erfurt Erfurt EDDE ERF 8,500Frankfurt/Main Frankfurt/Main EDDF FRA 13,100Hahn Hahn EDFH HHN 8,000Hamburg Hamburg EDDH HAM 12,000Hannover Hannover EDDV HAJ 12,400Leipzig-Halle Leipzig-Halle EDDP LEJ 8,200Munich Munich EDDM MUC 13,100Münster-Osnabrück Münster-Osnabrück EDDG FMO 7,100Nürnberg Nürnberg EDDN NUE 8,800Saarbrücken Saarbrücken EDDR SCN 6,500Stuttgart Stuttgart EDDS STR 10,900
105 Source: Adapted from Aircraft Charter World (2006). 106 Classification according to ADV. See: Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher Verkehrslughäfen (2005).
74
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
Appendix 3/2
Listing of German Airports in Germany 107
Regional Airports 108
Town Airport name ICAO IATA Rwy length (feet)Altenburg Nobitz EDAC AOC 6,800Augsburg Augsburg EDMA AGB 4,100Barth Barth EDBH BBH 3,900Bayreuth Bayreuth EDQD BYU 2,900Bielefeld Windelsbleiche EDLI BFE 2,400Braunschweig Braunschweig EDVE BWE 5,100Chemnitz-Jahnsdorf Chemnitz-Jahnsdorf EDCJ 1,900 *Cottbus-Drewitz Cottbus-Drewitz EDCD 8,200Cottbus-Neuhausen Cottbus-Neuhausen EDAP 2,600 *Egelsbach Egelsbach EDFE 2,900Eisenach-Kindel Eisenach-Kindel EDGE 3,900Essen/Mülheim Essen/Mülheim EDLE ESS 5,000Friedrichshafen Friedrichshafen EDNY FDH 7,700Gera Leumnitz EDAJ 2,400Heringsdorf Heringsdorf EDAH HDF 7,500Hof-Plauen Hof-Plauen EDQM HOQ 4,800Jena Schongleina EDBJ 2,500Karlsruhe/Baden-Baden Karlsruhe/Baden-Baden EDSB FKB 9,700Kassel Calden EDVK KSF 4,900Kiel Holtenau EDHK KEL 4,100Lahr Lahr EDTL LHA 9,800Lübeck Blankensee EDHL LBC 5,900Laage Rostock-Laage ETNL RLG 8,200Magdeburg Magdeburg EDBM 3,200Marl Loemuhle EDLM 2,700Meschede Schuren EDKM 2,900Mönchengladbach Mönchengladbach EDLN MGL 3,900Neubrandenburg Neubrandenburg ETNU FNB 7,500Paderborn-Lippstadt Paderborn-Lippstadt EDLP PAD 7,100Passau-Vilshofen Passau-Vilshofen EDMV 3,200 **Rothenburg/Görlitz Rothenburg/Görlitz EDBR 8,200Schwerin-Parchim Schwerin-Parchim EDOP SZW 9,800Siegerland Siegerland EDGS SGE 5,300Speyer Speyer/Ludwigshafen EDRY 4,000Stendal-Borstel Stendal-Borstel EDOV 6,400Strausberg Strausberg EDAY QPK 3,900Welzow Welzow EDCY 4,900Zweibrücken Zweibrücken EDRZ 9,600
* Unpaved** PPR 4,100 ft
107 Source: Adapted from Aircraft Charter World (2006). 108 Classification according to ADV. See: Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher Verkehrslughäfen (2005).
75
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
76
Appendix 3/3
Listing of German Airports in Germany 109
General Aviation Airports (Paved Runway Length > 2,000 ft)
Town Airport name ICAO IATA Rwy length (feet)Aalen-Heidenheim Elchingen EDPA 3,100Allendorf/Eder Allendorf/Eder EDFQ 3,500Allstedt Allstedt EDBT 3,900Anklam Anklam EDCA 2,900Arnbruck Arnbruck EDNB 2,000Arnsberg Arnsberg EDLA 3,000Aschaffenburg Aschaffenburg EDFC 2,700Baden-Baden Oos EDTB 4,100Ballenstedt Ballenstedt EDCB 2,200Bautzen Bautzen EDAB 7,200Bonn Hangelar EDKB 2,600Borkum Borkum EDWR BMK 3,200Breitscheid Breitscheid EDGB 2,900Bremerhaven Am Luneort EDWB BRV 3,000Bremgarten Bremgarten EDTG 5,400Brilon/Hochsauerland Brilon/Hochsauerland EDKO 2,400Burg Feuerstein Burg Feuerstein EDQE 3,100Coburg Brandensteinsebene EDQC 2,800Cochstedt/Schneidlingen Cochstedt/Schneidlingen EDBC 7,200Dahlemer Binz Dahlemer Binz EDKV 3,500Damme Damme EDWC 2,200Diepholz Diepholz ETND 4,200Dinslaken Schwarze Heide EDLD 2,900Donaueschingen-Villingen Donaueschingen-Villingen EDTD 4,200Drewitz Cottbus-Drewitz EDCD 8,200Eggenfelden Eggenfelden EDME 3,800Eisenhüttenstadt Eisenhüttenstadt EDAE 2,900Emden Emden EDWE EME 3,200Finow Finow EDAV 8,200Flensburg Schäferhaus EDXF FLF 4,000Freiburg/Breisgau Freiburg/Breisgau EDTF 4,000Ganderkesee Atlas Airfield EDWQ 2,700Giessen Lutzellinden EDFL 2,300Grossenhain Grossenhain EDAK 7,800Gunzenhausen Reutberg EDMH 2,300Guttin Guttin EDCG GTI 2,900Halle Oppin EDAQ 3,600Hamburg Finkenwerder EDHI XFW 7,600Hamm Lippewiesen EDLH 2,900
109 Source: Adapted from Aircraft Charter World (2006).
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
Appendix 3/4
Listing of German Airports in Germany 110
General Aviation Airports (Paved Runway Length > 2,000 ft) Town Airport name ICAO IATA Rwy length (feet)Hartenholm Hartenholm EDHM 2,400Hassfurt Schweinfurt EDQT 3,600Heide Busum EDXB HEI 2,300Herzogenaurach Herzogenaurach EDQH 2,200Heubach Heubach EDTH 2,400Hoppstädten-Weiersbach Hoppstädten-Weiersbach EDRH 2,100Höxter-Holzminden Höxter-Holzminden EDVI 2,600Juist Juist EDWJ JUI 2,200Kamenz Kamenz EDCM 3,600Karlshofen Karlshofen EDWK 2,200Karlsruhe Forchheim EDTK 3,100Koblenz Winningen EDRK 3,800Köthen Köthen EDCK 2,600Kulmbach Kulmbach EDQK 2,300Kyritz Kyritz EDBK 3,200Landshut Landshut EDML 2,900Leer Papenburg EDWF 2,600Lemwerder Lemwerder EDWD XLW 6,200Leutkirch Unterzeil EDNL 3,300Lüchow Rehbeck EDHC 2,100Mainbullau Mainbullau EDFU 2,300Mainz Finthen EDFZ 3,200Mannheim Mannheim City EDFM MHG 3,400Meinerzhagen Meinerzhagen EDKZ 3,800Melle-Gronegau Melle-Gronegau EDXG 2,500Memmingen Allgäu Airport EDJA FMM 7,800Mengen-Hohentengen Mengen-Hohentengen EDTM 3,900Merseburg Merseburg EDAM 3,700Mindelheim Mattsies EDMN 2,300Mosbach-Lohrbach Mosbach-Lohrbach EDGM 2,000Mühldorf Mühldorf EDMY 2,200Münster-Telgte Münster-Telgte EDLT 2,200Neumarkt/Opf. Neumarkt/Opf. EDPO 2,100Niederstetten Niederstetten Army ETHN 3,300Norderney Norderney EDWY NRD 3,200Nordholz Sea Airport ETMN 8,000Nordhorn Lingen EDWN 2,900Obermehler/Schlotheim Obermehler/Schlotheim EDCO 4,700Oberpfaffenhofen Oberpfaffenhofen EDMO OBF 7,500
110 Source: Adapted from Aircraft Charter World (2006).
77
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
Appendix 3/5
Listing of German Airports in Germany 111
General Aviation Airports (Paved Runway Length > 2,000 ft) Town Airport name ICAO IATA Rwy length (feet)Oberschleissheim Oberschleissheim EDNX 2,600Oehna Oehna EDBO 2,700Offenburg Offenburg EDTO 2,900Osnabrück Atterheide EDWO 2,600Peenemunde Peenemunde EDCP 7,800Peine Eddesse EDVP 2,900Pirmasens Pirmasens EDRP 2,600Porta Westfalica Porta Westfalica EDVY 2,800Rechlin-Larz Rechlin-Larz EDAX 7,800Regensburg Oberhub EDNR 2,100Reichelsheim Reichelsheim EDFB 2,300Rendsburg Schachtholm EDXR 3,100Riesa Gohlis EDAU 3,200Rosenthal-Field Plossen EDQP 2,400Rotenburg/Wümme Rotenburg/Wümme EDXQ 2,600Rothenburg o.d. Tauber Rothenburg o.d. Tauber EDFR 2,600Rottweil Zepfenhan EDSZ 2,600Saarlouis-Düren Saarlouis-Düren EDRJ 2,600Salzgitter Drutte EDVS 2,000Schleswig Schleswig EDXC 8,000Schonhagen Schonhagen EDAZ 3,900Schwäbisch Hall Hessental EDTY 3,000Schwenningen Am Neckar Schwenningen am Neckar EDTS 2,600St. Michaelisdonn St. Michaelisdonn EDXM 2,200St. Peter-Ording St. Peter-Ording EDXO PSH 2,100Stade Stade EDHS 2,100Stadtlohn Wenningfeld EDLS 3,200Straubing Wallmühle EDMS RBM 3,000Trier Föhren EDRT 3,900Walldurn Walldurn EDEW 2,600Wangerooge Wangerooge EDWG AGE 2,700Werneuchen Werneuchen EDBW 4,900Westerland/Sylt Westerland/Sylt EDXW GWT 6,900Wilhelmshaven Mariensiel EDWI WVN 4,700Winzeln-Schramberg Winzeln-Schramberg EDTW 2,300Worms Worms EDFV 2,600Wriezen Wriezen EDON 7,800Würzburg Schenkenturm EDFW 2,100
List may not be exhaustive.
111 Source: Adapted from Aircraft Charter World (2006).
78
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
Appendix 4/1
“There-and-back-in a-day” Options
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7HEL
SXF/THF/TXLto
DUS FRA HAJ HAMfrom
IVLJOEJYVKAJKAOKEMKOKKTTKUOLPPMHQOULPORRVNSJYSVLTKUTMPVAAVRKAESALFBDUBGOBOOEVEFDEFROHAUHMRHOVKKNKRSKSULKNLYRMJFMOLMQNNVN KO
MUCCGN DTM BRE
OLAOSLOSYRRSSDNSKESOGSRPSSJSVGTOSTRDTRFVDBXKIXUCXUIXZO
STR
FI
There-and-back-in-a-day option
79
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
Appendix 4/2
“There-and-back-in a-day” Options
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7BOJSOF E E E E E E E EVAR E EBRQKLVOSRPRGZDNTLLURE
HU BUDPLQVNO
LV RIXBZGGDN EKRKKTWLCJPOZRZESZZWAWWROBAYBBUBCMCLJCNDIASOMROTP E ESBZSUJTGMTSR
E
CZ
BG
RO
PL
LT
EE
SXF/THF/TXLto
DUS FRA HAJ HAMfrom MUC STRCGN DTM
Departure from DE before 05:00 lcl
BRE
There-and-back-in-a-day option
80
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
Appendix 5/1
Airline Bookings for Sample Routes
Route 1: DUS - OUL
81
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
Appendix 5/2
Airline Bookings for Sample Routes
Route 2: DUS - VNO
82
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
Appendix 5/3
Airline Bookings for Sample Routes
oute 3: DUS - KTW
R
83
Commercial Business Aviation: A Valuable Travel Alternative for Business Companies in Germany?
of Authenticity
erewith I confirm
that this thesis is my own work, which was written without unauthorized assistance
and that all references are marked appropriately.
Nörvenich, 14 August 2006
Jürgen Willems
Declaration
H
84