Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Commercial Building Envelope Air Leakage
Presented by:•Matt Heron, P.E.,
Pie Consulting & Engineering•Stu Reeve, Energy Manager,
Poudre School District•Kim DeVoe, Energy Services Engineer,
Fort Collins Utilities,
Why Test & Repair Air Barriers?• Energy conservation
– Reduce heating and cooling loads– EPACT 2005 / EISA 2007
• 30% reduction over ASHRAE 90.1‐2004 by 2012• Net zero by 2030 (Executive Order 13514)
• Mechanical System Sizing/Operation– Air Exchange 20% to 50% of thermal load– Designing / Modeling Infiltration Loads
• Moisture and mold control– Water vapor transport via air movement – Very costly to remediate– Politically volatile
• Pollutant transport (IAQ)– Example: TEMF facilities ‐
Fumes
• Microclimate Conditioning
Historic Performance of Commercial Buildings– ASHRAE Fundamentals (CFM / ft2)
Whole Building Air Tightness Testing• ASTM E779: Standard Test Method for Determining Air Leakage Rate by Fan
Pressurization
• ASTM E1827: Standard Test Methods for Determining Air tightness
of Buildings
Using an Orifice Blower Door
• US Army Corps of Engineers Air Leakage Test Protocol for Measuring Air Leakage
in Buildings (Engineering & Construction Bulletin dated October 30, 2009)
Existing Building Retro‐Commissioning Poudre School District 2011 Testing
Air Tightness Testing Diagnostics• ASTM E1186: Standard Practices for Air Leakage
Site Detection in Building Envelopes and Air Barrier Systems
Low Slope Roof to Wall Interfaces
Steep Slope Roof to Wall Interfaces
Expansion Joints & Dissimilar InterfacesAIR LEAKAGE PATHWAY
INTERIOR
EXTERIOR
EXTERIOR
INTERIOR
AIR LEAKAGE OBSERVED
OBSERVE FOR SEALANT
Beam Pockets
Doors & Operable/Fixed Windows
Soffits & Mansard Roofs
Clerestory Assemblies & Skylights
Thermal Discontinuities
PSD 2011 Air Leakage Testing Results
City of Fort Collins Civic Center
High Electrical usage but low gas usage?
LEED Gold building– 3 story, 72,000 sf, built
in 2001– 2 RTU’s
split N S
– VAV’s
have electric reheat
– Metasys
BAS identified high electrical use on
the 1st
floor– Comfort complaints by
clerks on the 1st
fl; electric space heaters
under desks
Electricity Cost for Selected City Buildings ($/sf/yr)
$-
$0.20
$0.40
$0.60
$0.80
$1.00
$1.20
$1.40
$1.60
215 N. M ason 281 N. College Downtown Library Harmony Library City Hall
Selected City Buildings Gas Cost
$-
$0.05
$0.10
$0.15
$0.20
$0.25
$0.30
$0.35
215 N. M ason 281 N. College Downtown Library Harmony Library City Hall
IR investigation & Building Shell Study• IR images taken by Gary Schroeder, Fort Collins Utilities Senior Engineer
• Shell leakage investigation performed by Kevin Knight, Architectural Testing Inc.
Findings:– Cold air on 1st
fl caused by Stack effect – Exterior building materials penetrating inside the thermal
boundary– Misaligned/discontinuous & missing air barrier causing air
leakage into above ceiling return air plenums
Stack Effect: where it leaks matters
Misaligned or Missing Air Barrier, Exterior Finish penetrating the Thermal Boundary
Roof Air Barrier Continuity
Air Leakage at floor and roof decks
The Air Barrier Is Now Continuous (But only in accessible areas above ceiling grid)
Results• Building Air leakage Test‐out by Stuart Mitchell,
PIE Consulting and Engineering– Air leakage reduced from 0.43 cfm/sf
to 0.26
cfm/sf.
– A 41% reduction!• Reduced comfort complaints & space heaters• Discovered / repaired return air imbalances
in
building which were adding to the stack effect. • 2012 winter electric usage decreased
due to
reduced electric reheat in winter; increased natural gas usage for overall heating cost savings.
• 2012 Summer electrical usage did not increase, even during the hottest summer on record!
Civic Center GHG Reduction Exceeds Goal (based on electrical use)
Percent Annual Energy Savings due to improved Percent Annual Energy Savings due to improved building air tightness (Modeling results from Annex 46)building air tightness (Modeling results from Annex 46)
Source Leakage Rate at 0.3 in w.g. (75 Pa) cfm/ft2
Baseline 1.0
ASHRAE Std 189.1 requirement for air sealing 0.40
Current Army requirement for air sealing 0.25
Proposed requirement for air sealing 0.15
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
1A 2A 2B 3A 3B 3C 4A 4B 4C 5A 5B 6A 6B 7A 8A
Climate Zone
Ener
gy S
avin
gs
0.4 cfm/ft20.25 cfm/ft20.15 cfm/ft2
BECx
in Rating Systems/Codes/Specs
ASTM E2813 – Standard Practice for Building
Enclosure Commissioning
Raising the Bar for Commercial Buildings in Fort Collins
• New Commercial Building Tightness Standards:
– ASHRAE: 0.40 cfm/sf– U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACE): 0.25 cfm/sf– City of Fort Collins: 0.25 cfm/sf
• Developed New Building Code Amendments – Fort Collins Utilities consulting w/ PIE– Lessons learned from testing and repairs done to
the Fort Collins Civic Center
Building Tightness Testing as a Design Tool to Meet Goals for Poudre School District
• Impact of Providing the Right Tools to Challenge Conventional Design
• Building Envelope Studies and Impact on Energy Modeling
• Design Team Confidence to “Right Size”
Mechanical Systems
• Reinforcing Goals Throughout the Design Process• Final Design Energy Modeling• Rebates and Incentives for High Performance Design• We’ll Keep You Posted
Thank You!
Matt HeronStu ReeveKim DeVoe