Upload
vuongliem
View
216
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Commercial Aspects of Gas Development in Southern Africa 21 May 2014
Paul Eardley-Taylor
Oil & Gas: Southern Africa
+27117217829; +27716037136
1 Contents
Section Page
1. Introduction to Standard Bank 2
2. Market Introduction 5
3. South Africa 11
4. Mozambique 21
5. Regional Snapshot 28
6. What lies ahead? 30
Private and confidential
Section 1:
Introduction to Standard Bank
3
On the ground presence in 20 African countries
Natural partner in Africa
152 years of experience in Africa
Largest bank in Africa
– Over 42,000 employees in Africa
– Over 1,200 bank branches and 8,600 ATMs
Growth on the continent is a key strategic focus area
Market Capitalisation – ZAR 231 billion (19 May 2014)
Presence across the region and in key markets :
– IBTC Chartered Bank, Nigeria
– CFC Bank, Kenya
– Angola
– Mozambique
– Recently opened in South Sudan
Angola (20.1 million)
Botswana (2.1 million)
Côte d’Ivoire (19.8 million)
Mozambique (23.5 million)
Ghana (25.2 million)
Kenya (43.0 million)
Lesotho (1.9 million)
Malawi (16.3 million)
Mauritius (1.3 million)
Nigeria (170.1 million)
South Africa (52.2 million)
Swaziland (1.4 million)
Tanzania (43.6 million)
Uganda (35.9 million)
Zambia (14.3 million)
Zimbabwe (12.6 million)
Presence in 20
African countries
Unrivalled
knowledge of sub-
Saharan Africa
through on-the-
ground presence
Strong product
teams in
Johannesburg,
Lagos, Nairobi and
London
Key points Most comprehensive network in Sub-Saharan Africa
Namibia (2.1 million)
South Sudan (10.6 million)
(Population) Source: CIA World Factbook
Ghana
Nigeria
South
Sudan
Kenya D.R.C
Angola
Namibia
South
Africa Lesotho
Swaziland
Mauritius Botswana
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Mozambique
Malawi
Tanzania
Uganda
Standard Bank
Stanbic Bank
Stanbic IBTC Bank
CFC Stanbic Bank
Ethiopia
Côte d’Ivoire
DRC (73.6 million)
Ethiopia (91.7 million)
4 O&G Credential - Seplat Petroleum: US$535m IPO on NSE and LSE
Seplat closed its US$500m (N82.5bn equivalent) IPO on 14 April 2014 listing
shares on both the Nigeria Stock Exchange (“NSE”) and London Stock
Exchange (“LSE”). The transaction is notable for many reasons:
– first Nigerian company to have its ordinary shares dual listed on both
the LSE and the NSE
– largest ever IPO in Nigeria
– largest IPO in Sub Sahara Africa (ex SA) since 2008
– largest African Oil & Gas IPO since 2011
Standard Bank/Stanbic IBTC worked with regulators in Nigeria and London to
harmonise listing requirements to ensure a dual-primary IPO including:
– first Nigerian company to obtain UKLA approval to list Shares on the
Main Board of the London Stock Exchange
– first ever equity bookbuild process in Nigeria
– first IPO in Nigeria to settle in T+3 days
Standard Bank/Stanbic IBTC managed an extensive marketing campaign for
the Company, including:
– attending Standard Bank investor conferences since 2010
– extensive pilot fishing early in the IPO process to c. 50 investors
– award winning research analyst, Lionel Therond, publishing a 95 pg
research report sent to c. 1,000 investors globally
– investor education to over 100 investors in 10 days by 2 analysts
– Seplat management conducted a two week IPO roadshow in Nigeria,
UK, Europe, U.S., South Africa and Asia, meeting over 130 investors
The IPO included a global bookbuilding exercise whereby demand from
Nigeria built quickly with sizeable orders from key Pension and Insurance
funds. International and HNW investors showed strong demand such that
the books were covered going into the final week of the roadshow: Standard
Bank delivered early orders to ensure this successful “covered” messaging
The IPO book of demand closed oversubscribed with 310 investors, pricing
at 210p or NGN 576 per share, representing a premium valuation to peers
Standard Bank’s understanding of the Niger Delta and Pioneer Tax status,
which Seplat obtained in Feb-14, meant we were able to generate significant
orders from key international funds at a superior valuation
Standard Bank acted as Stabilisation Agent and Settlement Agent and was
integral to the successful listing debut, where shares traded up 6% in early
LSE trading and 5% “limit-up” on the first day trading on NSE
Term sheet Transaction highlights
Issuer overview Seplat Petroleum Development Company Plc
Listing Nigeria Stock Exchange and London Stock Exchange
Transaction type Initial Public Offering
Standard Bank role Joint Global Co-ordinator, Bookrunner and Joint Lead
Issuing House
Issue size US$500m or NGN 82.5bn (pre over-allotment option)
US$535m or NGN88.3bn (incl. over-allotment option)
Offer price NGN 576 (NGN535-700) / LSE: 210p (195-255p)
Shares offered 143,284,130 primary shares
Over-allotment option 10,336,183 primary shares
NSE / LSE split 52% (NSE) / 48% (LSE)
Pre-Money Valuation US$1.3bn to US$1.7bn
Market cap post money US$1.9bn (pre over-allotment option)
IPO % Market cap 28.7%
Demand overview
39%
4%
38%
2% 2%
15%
Standard Bank BNPRenCap CitiRBC Co-leads
48%
26%
13% 8%
4% 1%
Nigeria UKU.S. South AfricaEurope RoW
Demand by bank Demand by geography
Seplat Petroleum Development
Company Plc
April 2014
US$500m / NGN82.5bn
Dual listing on the Nigeria and
London Stock Exchanges
Joint Global Co-ordinator, Joint
Bookrunner and Joint Issuing House
(1) Excluding a Seplat managed order, Standard
Bank generated 39% of demand for the IPO, more
than any other bank
(1)
Insert front cover of
prospectus
Private and confidential
Section 2:
Market Introduction
6 African Oil & Gas: Snapshot
Oil & Gas
activities in Africa
dominated by
Nigeria, Angola,
Egypt, Algeria
and Libya
Development of
Oil & Gas
projects
challenging due
to lack of
infrastructure
Increased exploration
activities across East &
West Africa has
delivered new reserves
New frontier exploration
in deep/ultra deep
offshore, and potentially
also shale/CBM
Oil & Gas projects financed
by Oil Majors using their
corporate balance sheets
Development of infrastructure
projects catalyst for exploration
and development of O&G
projects
Financing available from
industry players, banks,
investment funds, capital
markets
World oil production 1999
(72.4mn bbl/d)
World oil reserves
(1.3 tn bbl)
North America S. & Cent. America Europe & Eurasia Middle East Africa Asia Pacific
O&G production
Key points Before 2000 Today
World oil production
(86.2mn bbl/d)
World oil reserves
(1.66tn bbl)
O&G
development
projects
20%
9%
19% 31%
11%
10% 107
98
70
686
85 40
Source: BP Statistical Review 2013
18%
9%
20% 33%
11%
10% 220
328
141 808
130 42
7 African Oil & Gas: More Upstream IOCs….
Traditionally, IOC operations (O&G Exploration and
Production activity) have been centred in Angola,
Equatorial Guinea, Gabon and Nigeria
More recently, Africa’s increasing upstream discoveries
have led to the IOCs and leading Independents entering
the following markets:
– Ghana, Kenya, Mozambique, Namibia, South
Africa, South Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda
– We show the attached upstream presence across
Standard Bank’s network and focus markets
Due to this change, Africa’s number and scale of touch
points with the IOCs has materially increased
According to Wood Mackenzie (2014), IOCs are learning
that ‘’Exploring is Easy. Producing is hard”
Key points Summary
Production < 100 kbbleq/d
Production > 100 kbbleq/d
Production > 1m bbleq/d
Appraisal Wells
Exploration Wells
Across the SB
network, IOC
activities are
broadening from the
Gulf of Guinea into
other markets
8 Africa Oil & Gas: IOC Upstream E&P
Key points Summary
IOC’s expected to
have largest capex
spend to 2020
Total, Tullow, Eni
and Anadarko top
drillers in 2013
Total to have largest
production by IOC in
Africa by 2020
Eni, Shell, Tullow,
Anadarko and Galp
Energia are
expected to grow
current production
the most to 2020 0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Kb
bl/d
ay 2013
2020
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Nu
mb
er
of
dri
lled
wells
Company Type US$bn %
Majors 189 48%
NOC 130 33%
Large Cap 33 8%
Mid Cap 11 3%
Independent 15 4%
Small Cap 16 4%
Total 394 100%
Top Drillers: Exploration and Appraisal Wells Drilled in 2013.
Current and Expected Production by IOC.
Source: Wood Mackenzie
Capex Spend to 2020 by Oil Co. Type.
9 African Oil & Gas: Unprecedented growth
Accompanying the sustained growth in the
upstream segment requires similar expansion in
downstream infrastructure: Refineries, terminals,
LNG, pipelines
Infrastructure particularly important for where new
production is landlocked
Many new infrastructure projects have already
been approved
International and domestic demand putting
pressure on Africa to increase production level and
to expand infrastructure network
Oil (m bbl/d) Gas (bcm)
Production Consumption
West African
Transform Margin
Pre-salt
play
East
African
gas
Indigenisation
Rift
Valley
Existing refinery
Existing LNG
Planned refinery
Planned LNG
Key points
Source: BP Statistical Review 2013
The sustained
growth in the
upstream segment
requires similar
expansion in
downstream
infrastructure:
Refineries,
Terminals,
LNG;
Pipelines; and
Power
7.9
9.4
2.6
3.5
2002 2012
138
216
70
123
2002 2012
Overview
10 African Oil & Gas: Changing Downstream Market
In the last decade, the African downstream market has
changed. Traditional Super Majors – Exxon, Chevron,
Shell, BP – have exited the market (except in South
Africa). Despite Africa’s growth, downstream returns on
capital are less than upstream and management time is
high. Only Total has remained
The exiting IOCs have been replaced by incoming
Traders who are developing integrated trading and
downstream businesses. The leading contenders are
Trafigura / Puma Energy and Vitol / Vivo Energy.
Glencore are moving into Africa O&G, recently picking
up businesses in Chad and Zimbabwe
Downstream is a business where scale increasingly
matters. Within Standard Bank’s network and focus
markets, most of the adjacent countries have at least
two of the four highlighted companies and certain
countries four or five.
An extension of downstream is the developing storage
sector, with multiple countries exploring import / storage
projects (instead of new refineries)
Within a decade, BP,
Chevron, Exxon
Mobil and Shell have
largely exited
African downstream
(except in South
Africa). Only Total
has remained of the
Super Majors
Key points Summary
They have been
replaced by the
widespread entry of
Puma Energy and
Vivo Energy, with
Glencore closely
considering its
position
Present
Private and confidential
Section 3:
South Africa
12 South Africa - Driving the Oil & Gas Discussion
CTL/GTL
Sasolburg/Secunda 1950s-1990s
PetroSA (Mossel Bay) 1992
Refineries
Enref (Durban) 1954
Chevref (Cape Town); 1966
Sapref (Durban); 1963
Natref (Sasolburg) and 1971
Pipelines
DJP 1965
ROMPCO 2004
Lilly Pipeline 1994
Key points Rear View Mirror The Road Ahead
Offshore North/West/East Capes, KZN
Shale Gas Karoo Basin
CBM Mpumalanga, Limpopo
LNG Imports Mossel Bay ? Saldanha? Coega?
Pipelines NMPP, Offshore/Shale Lines
Renewables Ethanol/Biodiesel
Clean Fuels Refinery Upgrades
Project Mthombo ??
South Africa Oil &
Gas has only
recently attracted
investor interest,
since 2009-2010
We expect SA’s
future O&G sector to
look different from
the present
Each of Offshore, Shale Gas and LNG imports are options for South Africa,
with different pros and cons applying to each source
13 Upstream – Offshore Potential
1
Cairn India and
PetroSA signed a farm-
in agreement for crude
oil and natural gas
exploration in the
offshore Block 1
2A
Ibhubesi Gas Field
Sunbird acquired
76% of production
licence; PetroSA
holds 24%
5/6
7
Anadarko and PetroSA
recently signed an
agreement for
Exploration Rights over
blocks 5/6 and 7
9 11B/12B
Project Ikhwezi: PetroSA started
drilling at the F-O Field in 2013 with first
gas expected 3Q 2014
In June 2012, Total submitted an application
for exploration rights South of block 9.
Canadian Natural
Resources completed
conversion of their licence in
blocks 11B/12B and Total
have farmed-in. Drilling is
targeted: a
– Q2/14 & Q4/14-Q2/15
ExxonMobil recently acquired
a 75% participating interest in
Impact’s Tugela South
Exploration Right
ExxonMobil have submitted an
application for exploration rights
South-East of Sasol Petroleum
International’s offshore block on
the East Coast
Increasing Offshore activity but SA is still pre-exploration (generally) Key points
There is increasing
investor interest and
activity regarding
offshore South
African acreage…
...We list the recent
events, with existing
offshore investors
also including Shell
and BHP Billiton...
Offshore investors
are targeting oil as
well as natural gas 7
Shell plan to
drill 1-2
exploration
wells in
2014-2015
14 Upstream - Falkland Islands Parallel
The Falklands islands are situated East of South
America and comprise of approximately 340 islands.
In 1998 six wells were drilled in the North Falkland
Basin, oil was found but this was not commercially
viable.
In 2010, Rockhopper (the only company to have found
commercially viable oil) started drilling exploration well
on the Sea Lion prospect and discovered oil. Of the 10
wells which were drilled 7 proved successful.
In June 2012, Rockhopper entered into a conditional
farm out agreement with Premier Oil plc whereby
Premier acquired 60% of the interest in the North
Falkland Basin.
Rockhopper is planning a minimum of 3 exploration
and appraisal wells on its North Falkland Basin.
First oil production anticipated for the third quarter of
2017 with output of over 30,000 b/d expected to be
achieved during 2019.
Together with Premier Oil, Rockhopper is looking at
exploration opportunities in RSA as it targets a
geological province that is a continuation of the
Cretaceous rifted Eastern margin play of the opening of
the South Atlantic.
CNR/Total, Anadarko and Shell South Africa have each
applied for exploration rights to start drilling in deep
offshore waters.
Total farmed into CNR’s al Resources have applied for
a block in the Outeniqua Basin (South Coast), they
believe there could be significant oil in this region. Total
plans to drill 1 well in 2014.
Anadarko holds an interest in some of the Orange
Basin Blocks, they have confirmed that there are
similarities between the Falkland plate elements and
the South African offshore zone.
Shell South Africa Upstream obtained an exploration
right for one of the Orange Basin blocks. Shell is
proposing to drill one or two wells in their blocks in
2014/2015.
South African Offshore Falkland Islands Key points
Falkland Island:
Wind – 30.0m/s
Surface Current–
1.4m/s
Water Depth – 450m
South Africa
Offshore
Wind – 45.0m/s
Surface Current–
3.0m/s
Water Depth –
<4000m
15 Upstream - Shale Gas Potential
Key points
Sungu Sungu Gas
has applied for two
TCPs for the
highlighted areas
(combined
100,000km2)
Shell has applied for
Exploration Rights for
their Western, Central
and Eastern Precincts
(each block 30,000km2)
Falcon Oil & Gas has applied for an
Exploration Right for their 30,000km2
block. Chevron will jointly co-operate in
exploration for an initial 5 year period
Bundu Gas has applied
for an Exploration Right for
a 4,600km2 block
Sasol / Statoil /
Chesapeake were
awarded a TCP for
the yellow highlighted
area, but
subsequently
withdrew the
application
A
B
C
D
E
A:
Sungu Sungu Gas
verbally advises its
TCP applications
have been accepted
B, C & D:
Each Party has
applied for
Exploration Rights,
including
submission of an
EMP (following
granting of a TCP)
E:
Sasol / Statoil /
Chesapeake were
awarded a TCP, but
let it lapse by not
applying for
Exploration Rights
Overview
In addition, Cairn
India has applied for
a TCP in the Eastern
Cape (by Port
Elizabeth) and Rhino
Resources Ltd in
Kwazulu-Natal
(inland from Durban)
16 Upstream - Shale Gas Potential (Continued)
Introduction Key points
Shale gas has become a very important driver in meeting the energy requirements of the United States and a strategic player in
driving US economic growth in recent years
The US EIA estimates SA Shale ‘’dry’’ gas potential to be around 390Tcf (2013) which needs to be reduced for economically
recoverable amounts (e.g. Assumptions - Econometrix Report 25-50 Tcf; Wood Mackenzie 128 Tcf; report SA Government
Report 30Tcf; PASA 40 Tcf which will only be known post the drilling of exploration and appraisal wells but at these levels are
transformational. Mossell Bay was built on around 1 Tcf, Sasol’s Mozambique Gas Imports around 3 Tcf P90
Shale Gas is presently an issue under debate in South Africa, from both a political and an environmental standpoint. The SA
Cabinet announced the end of the exploration moratorium on 7th September 2012 . Subsequently, Minister Shabangu clarified
seismic work can start immediately but hydraulic fracturing would only take place once mining regulations had been amended
(which should take 6-12 months from September 2012). Not yet finalised
The technological process used in prospecting and extracting shale gas is asserted by some to cause damage to the eco-
structure and water table. Note though these concerns have been addressed in the US where shale gas exploration and
production has been successfully carried out in multiple locations (e.g. Conway Country, Arkansas, alone has had 1 000 wells
drilled since 2004).
We envisaged a significant educational programme to be put in place – addressing concerns of local environmental parties’
concerns. Exploration will likely commence thereafter, probably 2015. If initial exploration activities are successful shale gas will
likely play a significant role in future iterations of the IRP (IRP2013 update) and the first gas-fired power plant could be online by
[2018] (gas engines), with CCGT IPPs, GTL and a domestic gas likely to follow afterwards (2020?). Shale gas will then
permanently change SA’s energy balance
Multiple companies have shown interest in shale gas including Shell (3 Exploration Licence applications); Bundu (1 EL
application); Falcon Oil & Gas, together with Chevron (1 EL application) are the front runners. BEE partners for the above
companies, and other International Shale Gas players, will no doubt also follow creating further opportunities. Note that each of
the above applicants will have to hand back acreage in time
A potential catalyst
to unlock value for
the country, and to
promote economic
growth
Shale gas is
currently under
debate in SA from a
political and
environmental
standpoint
Shale gas is starting
to play a significant
role in the IRP
Update 2013
17
Upstream - The Shale Gale
Key points Overview
1 billion cubic feet of
daily natural gas
production could
replace 150,000
barrels a day of
refined petroleum
Shale gas and tight oil reside in fine-grained sedimentary rock formations known as shale. Hydraulic fracturing (“fracking”)
was invented in 1947 but on its own was only mildly successful in unlocking shale. From 2002, the process was
combined with ‘’horizontal (or lateral) drilling’’ in which a well is drilled vertically into the shale formation before extending
horizontally (for up to 3-4kms) through the shale layer increasing the length of the layer from which gas or oil can be
extracted, with fracking used to extract the product.
In 2013 the US had an estimated minimum recoverable shale gas of 665 Tcf and tight oil of 58 bn bbl.
The US shale gas production has grown by 51% p.a. since 2007 leading to falling gas prices. In 2013 the average price of
gas in the US was $3 per Mcf, $12 in Europe and $18 in Japan. To take advantage of the price difference producers are
looking at exporting LNG from the US (continued overleaf).
By 2020 Shale gas and
tight oil could
contribute $380bn and
$690bn per year to US
GDP.
Mckinsey Global Institute, July 2013
International Energy Agency, World Outlook 2013
Shale gas brought
about the opportunity
to change North
American EIUGs from
high-cost producers
to "incredibly
competitive
18
The amended MPRDA has been passed by parliament in March 2014 and will be sent to President for signing. We expect the
President to look at any of the issued raised by stakeholders but have not been fully accommodated in the amendments. The
MPRDA is unsigned as at today
In a statement, cabinet describes the MPRDA as giving effect to section 24 of the Constitution “by ensuring that the nation’s
minerals are developed in an orderly manner while promoting justifiable social and economic development”. The MPRDA
was previously amended in 2008
The Petroleum Exploration and Production (“PEP”) provisions have been relatively uncontroversial since 2002, potentially
due to the relative lack of SA’s resources developed since then. However, significant ongoing interest in shale gas, offshore
gas and – to a lesser extent – CBM mean it is vital to ensure the amended MPRDA is appropriate for O&G development.
Key Points to be addressed, amongst others:
– The abolition of the Petroleum Agency of South Africa – “Designated Agency”;
– Requirement to partially relinquish rights when renewing rights or applying for next stage rights;
– Beneficiation requirements determined by the Minister of Mineral Resources, impacting massively on the route to market
and the attractiveness of upstream;
– Potential discrepancies between the objectives of different Government Ministries (e.g. DMR v DoE) ;
– Requested 20% free carried Interest for the State during the production phase, including linkage to royalties/tax.
– Amended Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Requirements (increased from 9% to 26% by applying the Mining
Charter)
– The most recent amendment is the floated Production Sharing Agreement concept
Noting SA’s developmental objectives outlined in the National Development Plan, we envisage that its in SA’s interest to
encourage these investors to explore SA’s geology as a priority to determine whether SA has significant hydrocarbon
potential.
Standard Bank has provided commercial comments on the Amendment Bill and assisted multiple clients in their response
Upstream - The MPRDA
Draft Mineral and Petroleum Resource Development Act Amendment Bill, 2012 Key points
In its current form, the amended MPRDA could have a material impact on the development of the industry. We expect clarity
over time, partially through regulations, due to the clear economic advantages of promoting a growing SA O&G sector
A change to SA’s
‘’Upstream Law’’
has been mooted at
a key moment – just
before many parties
start exploration
19 Midstream/Downstream - Wonderfuel Gas
Gas to Power (GTP)
– IRP 2013 (‘’Big Gas Scenario”). In time, we expect 15 GW+
GTP
– Shale Gas tariffs probably R 1.00 kWh
Gas to Industry (GTI)
– Pipelines to Coega (?) and one along West Coast to
Saldanha/CPT (?).
– Conversion of DJP to Gas and connection to Karoo (?)
– Reduced energy costs for SA manufacturing, per US model
Conversion to liquid fuels (GTL) (if oil not found ?)
– Mossel Bay/Sasolburg GTL expansions and / or Karoo?
Transportation Options (GTT) (if oil not found ?)
– Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)
– National filling stations network and repowering of truck and
bus fleets, leading to balance of payments savings
Gas to Communities (GTC)
– Huge benefits for rural/poor communities
If oil is found, there is a massive potential economic impact
– Standard Bank research note (2013)
Potential Applications Key points
CNG?
Generation of
electricity
Conversion to liquid
fuels?
Industrial benefits
Before offshore/shale develops, the front runners are Ibhubesi Gas Field (offshore gas into Eskom’s Ankerlig) and
Gourikwa LNG import (LNG into Eskom’s Gourikwa and Mossell Bay)
Cheap gas from Mozambique may be less likely post Mozambique’s price discovery since 2010
20
South Africa faces multiple scenarios (SBSA illustration) Key points
Durban
Midstream/Downstream – Multiple Infrastructure Options
?
?
?
Kudu IPP?
Ibhubesi IPP?
Non-Shale Prospects
CBM potential being evaluated in the Region
– Botswana estimates a reported 60Tcf of potential
– Zimbabwean potential est. 40Tcf
– SA est. approx. 15-40Tcf
Port Elizabeth
Shale Gas Potential
Repower OCGT
Repower new OCGT
Offshore O&G (?)
Existing Gas Pipeline
New Gas Source
New CCGT IPP (?)
New Gas Pipeline (?)
Gas to liquids (GTL)
?
Mossel Bay GTL Gourikwa
Ankerlig
New TX Lines (?) Richards
Bay
Secunda
GTL
?
?
? ?
ExxonMobil/ Impact
CNR/Total
Anadarko
Shell
Cairn
India Eskom’s fleet
Pipeline to
Area 1/4?
SA Gas
Infrastructure
Requirements:
– LNG Import
Terminals
– OCGT plants (fuel
switching/CCGTC
CGT)
– New CCGT
plants/pipelines
Sunbird
DJP converted to
Natural Gas (???)
Karoo – Kroonstad
750km Potential
Pipeline (???)
Private and confidential
Mozambique
Section 4
22 Unprecedented Reserve Growth
Key points
ENH is the Government of Mozambique’s mechanism for state
participation in Oil & Gas developments on/offshore in
Mozambique.
In upstream concessionary agreements, by arrangement, ENH
receives a free equity carry on the exploration phase, and the
opportunity to participate in the production phase.
Accordingly, ENH now has the below reserves:
– 15% in Area 1 (15 Tcf gas in place); and
– 10% in Area 4 (8.5-8.7 Tcf gas in place)
As a result, ENH has 23.5 – 23.7 Tcf of gas in place, with further
upside potential as exploration companies continue to explore
the offshore Mozambican blocks and firm up discoveries
Both Anadarko and Eni are currently looking to develop a LNG
export facility in order to monetise their reserves
– The plant will initially be based on two trains, with
potential to ramp up to multiple trains
– ENI are discussing floating LNG schemes to supplement
land-based plant
– Per Anadarko, LNG will be sold under term contracts with
an expected delivery window from
► 2018 (Train 1)
► 2020 (Train 2)
Mozambique Gas Discoveries ENH Participation
The Anadarko and Eni led consortia have made material
offshore discoveries in Areas 1 and 4 of the Rovuma Basin -
which are likely to mean that Mozambique will become a major
natural gas producer
– Anadarko’s discoveries to date total an estimated 40-70
Tcf of recoverable gas, with gas in place of around 100
Tcf (Anadarko, Nov 12, Jul13)
– Eni records gas in place of 85 -87 Tcf (ENI, Aug 13)
Current gas in place estimates sit at 185- 187 Tcf (based on Eni
and Anadarko announcements)
– Reserve Certification achieved for Prosperidade (for initial
two LNG trains)
It is estimated that this potential places Mozambique in the top 9
of global gas reserve rankings and in the top 5 for non-
associated gas
July 2013 - Tullow Oil found non-commercial gas (on a
standalone basis) at the Cachalote-1 exploration well in Area 2
August 2013- Anadarko announce agreement to sell a 10
percent interest in Mozambique’s Offshore Area 1 for
$2.64billion to ONGC Corporation Limited.
Source: BP Statistical Review 2013; ENI;
Anadarko; Standard Bank
Between the
Anadarko and Eni –
led consortia’s
discoveries,
Mozambique now
has 185 – 187 Tcf of
GIP
It is estimated that
this potential places
Mozambique in the
top 10 of global gas
reserve rankings
and in the top 5 for
non-associated gas
23 Afungi LNG Park
Conceptual 10-Train Layout Key points
Liquefaction Trains
The adjacent schematic
depicts the initial
conceptual 10-train
layout for the Afungi
LNG Park
The initial FEED for the
LNG plant will include
the design of the first 4
trains – 5MMTPA each
Total park concept to
include up to 10 trains –
50 MMTPA in total
Initial construction phase
to include the first 2
trains
Source: Anadarko
24 LNG is the key first step
Export market is the key to attract funding to develop gas resources Key points
Securing LNG sales contracts are key to unlocking the future of Mozambique, without it nothing will happen.
In turn, the timing of LNG first gas production is critical for potential offtakers
LNG Sales
Contracts
Upstream and
LNG
Development
Funding
Airport Expansion
Port Construction
Rail Network Expansion
Road Improvement
Fertilizer Plant
Ammonia Plant
LNG Revenue
Tax Revenue
Gas-fired Power Plant
Petrochemical Plant
GTL
Methanol plant
Enhanced Agricultural Output
Accelerate Infrastructure
Accelerate Industrialisation
and
Increased Access to Electricity
Enhanced Social Investment
Enhanced Industrial Output
As with other global
markets, developing
an LNG export plant
is expected to
unlock
Mozambique’s
economic future
25 Case Study: Oman LNG (Oman)
The Growth Catalyst Key points
0
10 000
20 000
30 000
40 000
50 000
60 000
70 000
80 000
90 000
US
D
USD mn USD per capita
Oman LNG, in Qalhat near Sur in Oman, was the country’s first LNG infrastructure development and was the catalyst
for future development. The construction was launched in November 1996, and the plant was commissioned in
September 2000.
The LNG plant is supplied through a 360km pipeline from the central Oman gas field complex and consists two 3.3
MTPA liquefaction trains – at a total construction cost of USD 2bn
Since Oman LNG closed in November 1996:
– Oman has closed over 20 large gas-derived projects since Oman LNG
– These additional projects have added immense value to the Oman GDP and to local economic growth.
► Over 18 years, GDP has increased by CAGR 9.6% (1995-2013*)
► The catalyst to unlock the value for the country, and to promote economic growth, was the initial Oman LNG
project
The Omani LNG example sets the scene for the future possible Mozambican situation and it is indicative of the
possibility for Mozambique. Subsequent investment and ancillary infrastructure and much needed economic growth
would follow
Oman has closed
over 20 large gas-
derived projects
since Oman LNG
The catalyst to
unlock the value for
the country, and to
promote economic
growth, was the
initial Oman LNG
project
The Oman LNG
example sets the
scene for the future
possible
Mozambican
situation and it is
indicative of the
possibility for
Mozambique
*Using EIU historical and forecast data
26
2012 – 2016
– New LNG supply capacity is expected from Australia and Papua New Guinea (Angola now online)
– Lead US regas conversions will come online (e.g. Sabine Pass)
2018 onwards
– Main East African competition are more US Regas conversions and Canada.
LNG Market Summary
Key points
BG Group expect global LNG demand to increase @ 4.8% CAGR to 2025 (driven by Asia) meaning
a 150 MTPA supply gap. US Regas conversions are expected to supply some but not all demand,
leaving an opportunity for Mozambique LNG
Market Opportunity
What Supply will meet growing demand? Supply Commentary
Source: BG Group, Multiple
New LNG supply
capacity is expected
from Australia,
Papua New Guinea
and US regas
conversions (fuelled
by shale gas), with
Canadian exports
also being a
possibility
Multiple North American LNG export projects are
under development (fuelled by shale gas):
– 1 approved and under construction (FERC,
Sep13); 13 sites proposed to FERC (FERC,
Sep13)
– An additional 17 US/Canada sites have been
identified (FERC, Sep 13)
There are mixed market views on the impact of
North America. Some market participants note a
reduction of demand in the 2018-2019 period.
Others, e.g. BG Group, believe that most of the US
Regas Conversions will never be completed for
various reasons – e.g. local opposition; developer
expertise; offtake market (e.g. future price increases
in Henry Hub may make landed LNG less
competitive in Asia and hit economics).
27
1. Agreements with Government
Need for a "Project Agreement" or ‘’Concession Agreement’’ that reflects use of gas in LNG (not just E&P) and all
infrastructure needs in the context of changes to the Petroleum Law and the development of a Gas Master Plan
Significant assistance required from the Government on licenses, permits etc, as well as investor protection
mechanisms (e.g. offshore bank accounts)
2. Trains and LNG Operator
Final decision on two (2) or four (4) trains from inception or stepped execution plan from 2 to 4 trains
Potential need to add an experienced LNG operator to the Area 1 and 4 shareholder groups
3. ENH Capitalisation
Required in order for their participation in the development and production stages of the concession
– ENH would require approx USD 3 - 6 bn by 2014 to retain existing 10% - 15% participation in Areas 1 / 4 and
fund its pro-rata share of completion support (underpinning the LNG financing)
ENH looking to increase their participation in future projects to [40%]
– Once able to do so, ENH would look to develop blocks independently and / or act as Operator
4. Funding Requirements
Estimated capex costs of USD 16-20bn inclusive of Financing Costs (Sources: Anadarko, Standard Bank)
USD 12-14bn debt and USD 6-8bn equity is a huge obligation post the global financial crisis in any market
– Raising the necessary liquidity is likely the biggest challenge in a B+ (S&P) / B (Fitch) market
– Introduction of Basel III for commercial Banks and country risk inexperience for most
Key Strategic Decisions
Key points
In December 2013,
the Anadarko and
ENI led consortia
reached a Heads of
Agreement –
Establishing
foundational
principles for the
coordinated
development of
common natural gas
reservoirs in Areas 1
and 4
Funding challenges
are significant in the
current global
environment
The next 12-18 months will determine the next 10-20 years
Private and confidential
Regional Snapshot
Section 5
29 Regional Snapshot
Key points Namibia Botswana
• Exploration wells for CBM- if successful appraisal wells
may then lead to GTT (Gas to Transport) projects and
supply to power stations. Query flow rates
• Exploration licence issued for shale gas in the Kalahari
Karoo Basin
• Downstream, retail chain and depot growth
• Puma, Vivo, Engen etc
Zimbabwe
• Exploration of offshore Oil & Gas wells
• 5 dry wells up to now albeit evidence of
hydrocarbon structure
• Offshore natural gas
• Kudu Gas Project remains under development
• Downstream, retail chain and depot growth:
• Puma, Vivo, Engen etc
• LPG Storage facility under consideration
• Potential CBM (Discovery)
• Midstream – NOIC pipeline (fed by CPMZ)
• Downstream, retail chain and depot growth:
• Puma M&A market entry
• Vivo market entry
• Glencore M&A market entry
Optimism for the
Southern African
region
O&G businesses are
being built up in SA
and Mozambique
with the need to
replicate this
strategy in other
parts of Africa.
Private and confidential
What lies ahead?
Section 6:
31 Is Past Performance a Future Guide?
Key points Papua New Guinea LNG North Sea Oil
• 1943 - First well discovery under Schoonebeek (Netherlands)
• 1959 - Discovery of Groningen Gas Field (Netherlands)
• 1964 - Continental Shelf Act 1964 is legislated in the UK:
issuing licences for hydrocarbons production
• 1965 - Discovery of Viking Gas Field (UK)
• 1970 - Discovery of Forties Oil Field (UK)
• 1971 - Discovery of Brent oilfield (Scotland) Frigg gas field
• 1975 - Oil production from Ardmore and Forties oil fields
11 years of development from the issuing of UK
licences to the production phase
South Africa
• 2009 - Bulk of licences issued (CNR older)
• 2014 - Total/CNR to drill their first deep offshore well
• 2014/2015 - MPRDA finalization
• 2022? Offshore O&G production
5 years of development and exploration phase close to
starting. Deeper water and more challenging weather
• 1987 - Hides Gas field discovery
• 1998 - Oil and Gas Act of 1998 is legislated, 5 different
licences for oil and gas activities can be issued under the Act
• 1998 - Initiating of a project to construct a pipeline to transport
the gas to Australia
• 2006 - Discovery of Elk gas field
• 2007 - Suspension of pipeline to Australia
• 2007 - LNG project planning begins
• 2008 - Discovery of Antelope gas field
• 2009 - Financial Close of LNG/pipeline/ Field
• 2014 - LNG Operations commence
27 years of since the discovery of gas to final operation of
LNG but only 7 years from concept switch
Mozambique LNG
• 2005 - Anadarko apply for licence
• 2006 - Anadarko commence plans for the building of the
LNG/ pipeline/ field expected
• 2010 - First discovery of Gas- Orca-1 well
• 2015? Financial close of LNG/ pipeline/ Field expected
• 2018? Operation of First train expected
The North Sea
offshore Oil
development are
compared to those
of South Africa to
date
PNG LNG moved
fast once the sales
concept changed.
Mozambique LNG
under development
4 years from first exploration discovery and LNG plant
development progressing
32 What Lies ahead?
1. South African Offshore Oil & Gas:
• Total and CNR are expected to spud first well from June 2014 (150- 200km south of Mossel Bay).
• Finalization of the MPRDA - resolution of the fiscal terms, free carry percentage, BEE compulsory participation,
state buy-in option and beneficiation.
2. Shale Gas:
• Exploration Licence Award, detailed drilling regulations and interaction with Gas Utilisation Master Plan
(“GUMP”).
1. Clean Fuels:
• Decisions regarding Go/ No Go; Which Euro; cost recovery mechanism, timing.
2. Services and local content strategy
3. Latest turn of energy policy documents:
• GUMP, IEP, IRP
1. Mozambique LNG:
• Agreement of commercial terms for first two trains
• Raising of debt and equity (Africa’s largest ever Project)
1. Namibia offshore
• Will Repsol’s well be the first successful one? North Sea oil needed multiple wells….
Key points Key Issues for the next 12 months
1
2
3
4
5
6
The next 12 months
should lead to the
progression of many
issues
7
33 Disclaimer
This presentation is provided for information purposes only on the express understanding that the information contained herein will be regarded as strictly confidential. It is not to be delivered
nor shall its contents be disclosed to anyone other than the entity to which it is being provided and its employees and shall not be reproduced or used, in whole or in part, for any purpose other
than for the consideration of the financing or transaction described herein, without the prior written consent of a member of the Standard Bank Group. The information contained in this
presentation does not purport to be complete and is subject to change. This is a commercial communication. This presentation may relate to derivative products and you should not deal in such
products unless you understand the nature and extent of your exposure to risk. The presentation does not include a personal recommendation and does not constitute an offer, or the
solicitation of an offer for the sale or purchase of any financial product, service, investment or security. The investments and strategies discussed here may not be suitable for all investors; if you
have any doubts you should consult your investment advisor. The investments discussed may fluctuate in price or value Whilst every care has been taken in preparing this presentation, no
member of the Standard Bank Group gives any representation, warranty or undertaking and accepts no responsibility or liability as to the accuracy, or completeness, of the information in this
presentation Past performance is not indicative of future results. For the avoidance of doubt, our duties and responsibilities shall not include tax advisory, legal, regulatory accounting or other
specialist or technical advice or services. You are to rely on your own independent appraisal of and investigations into all matters and things contemplated by this presentation. By accepting this
presentation, you agree to be bound by the foregoing limitations. Kindly note that this presentation does not represent an offer of funding since any facility to be granted in terms of this
presentation would be subject to the Standard Band Group obtaining the requisite internal and external approvals. Copyright 2010 Standard Bank Group. All rights reserved.
UK Residents
This presentation is not intended for the use of retail clients and must not be acted on or relied on by persons who are retail clients. Any investment or investment activity to which this
presentation relates is only available to persons other than retail clients and will be engaged in only with such persons. Standard Bank Plc (SB Plc) is authorised and regulated by the Financial
Services Authority (FSA), entered in the FSA’s register (register number 124823) and has approved this presentation for distribution in the UK only to persons other than retail clients. Persons
into whose possession this presentation comes are required by SB Plc to inform themselves about and to observe these restrictions. Telephone calls may be recorded for quality and regulatory
purposes. Standard Bank Plc, 20 Gresham Street, London, EC2V 7JE.
South African Residents
The Standard Bank of South Africa Limited (Reg.No.1962/000738/06) is regulated by the South African Reserve Bank and is an Authorised Financial Services Provider and Credit Provider.
United States Residents
In the US, Standard Bank Plc is acting through its agents, Standard Americas, Inc. and Standard New York Securities, Inc. Both are affiliates of Standard Bank Plc. Standard Americas, Inc is
registered as a commodity trading advisor and a commodity pool operator with the NFA. Standard New York Securities, Inc is a member of FINRA and SIPC. Neither are banks, regulated by
the United States Federal Reserve Board, nor insured by the FDIC.
Hong Kong Residents
Standard Bank Asia Limited is a fully licensed bank under the Banking Ordinance and is a registered institution under the Securities and Futures Ordinance in Hong Kong. Standard Securities
Asia Limited is a licensed corporation with the Securities and Futures Commission. Any investments and services contained or referred to in this presentation may not be suitable for you and it
is recommended that you consult an independent investment advisor if you are in doubt about such investments or investment services.
Dubai Residents
Standard Bank Plc, Dubai Branch, is regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority (‘DFSA) (register number F000028). Within the Dubai International Financial Centre, (‘DIFC’) the
financial products or services to which this marketing material relates will only be made available to Professional Clients, including a Market Counterparty, who meet the regulatory criteria of
being a Client.
Turkey Residents
Standard Unlu Menkul Degerler A.S. and Standard Unlu Portfoy Yonetimi A.S. are regulated by the Turkish Capital Markets Board “CMB”). According to CMB’s legislation, the information,
comments and recommendations contained in this presentation are not investment advisory services. Investment advisory services are provided under an investment advisory agreement
between a brokerage house, a portfolio management company, a bank that does not accept deposits or other capital markets professionals and the client. The comments and recommendations
contained in this presentation are based on the personal opinions of the authors. These opinions may not be appropriate for your financial situation and risk and return preferences. For that
reason, investment decisions relying solely on the information contained in this presentation may not meet your expectations.