1
3. Chow DK, Sung JJ. Is the prevalence of idiopathic ulcers really on the increase? Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 4: 1767. 4. McColl KE. Helicobacter pylori-negative nonsteroidal anti- inammatory drug-negative ulcer. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2009; 38: 35361. Commentary: new tools to assess hepatic steatosis what do we want to measure? Z. Yu* ,,& V. W.-S. Wong* ,*Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. Institute of Digestive Disease, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. Department of Liver Disease, Shuguang Hospital Afliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China. E-mail: [email protected] doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2012.05168.x We read with great interest the article by Permutt et al. that demonstrated the use of proton density-fat fraction (PDFF) by magnetic resonance imaging to measure hepatic steato- sis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). 1 In addition, patients with cirrhosis had less steato- sis than noncirrhotic patients by both PDFF and histology. The latter nding has major clinical implications. As NAFLD progresses towards cirrhosis and end-stage liver disease, hepatic steatosis often decreases or disappears. 2 In fact, NAFLD is believed to be the most common cause of cryptogenic cirrhosis. 3 Decrease in hepatic steatosis thus cannot be taken as evidence of disease improvement. How should we interpret steatosis results then? At the clinic setting, one may look for other risk factors of disease progression. For example, if a patient is nondiabetic and achieves weight reduction, a reduction in hepatic steatosis most likely represents genuine improvement. 2, 4 On the other hand, for future clinical research using non-invasive tests only, steatosis results should be supplemented by markers of necroinammation and brosis. 5, 6 Moreover, this study did not include a control group without NAFLD. Future studies are required to evaluate the accuracy of PDFF in diagnosing NAFLD. It would also be important to compare PDFF with other state-of-the-art non-invasive tests of steatosis like proton-magnetic reso- nance spectroscopy and dual gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging. 7, 8 In conclusion, new and promising tools for the mea- surement of hepatic steatosis have been developed in the past few years. These tests will likely have a major impact on future research and practice. At the end of the day, the ultimate test would be whether these investi- gations predict clinical outcomes such as cirrhosis, hepa- tocellular carcinoma and cardiovascular complications. 9 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Declaration of personal interests: Vincent Wong has served in the advisory boards of Novartis, Roche, Gilead and Otsuka, and received paid lecture fees from Abbott Diagnostics, Novartis, Roche and Echosens. Declaration of funding interests: None. REFERENCES 1. Permutt Z, Le T-A, Peterson MR, et al. Correlation between liver histology and novel magnetic resonance imaging in adult patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease - MRI accurately quanties hepatic steatosis in NAFLD. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2012; 36: 229. 2. Wong VW, Wong GL, Choi PC, et al. Disease progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a prospective study with paired liver biopsies at 3 years. Gut 2010; 59: 96974. 3. Caldwell SH, Oelsner DH, Iezzoni JC, et al. Cryptogenic cirrhosis: clinical characterization and risk factors for underlying disease. Hepatology 1999; 29: 6649. 4. Wong VW, Hui AY, Tsang SW, et al. Prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes and postchallenge hyperglycaemia in Chinese patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006; 24: 121522. 5. Shen J, Chan HL, Wong GL, et al. Non-invasive diagnosis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis by combined serum biomarkers. J Hepatol 2012; 56: 136370. 6. Wong VW, Vergniol J, Wong GL, et al. Diagnosis of brosis and cirrhosis using liver stiffness measurement in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2010; 51: 45462. 7. Lee SS, Park SH, Kim HJ, et al. Non-invasive assessment of hepatic steatosis: prospective comparison of the accuracy of imaging examinations. J Hepatol 2010; 52: 57985. 8. Wong VW, Wong GL, Tsang SW, et al. High prevalence of colorectal neoplasm in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Gut 2011; 60: 82936. 9. Younossi ZM, Stepanova M, Raq N, et al. Pathologic criteria for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: interprotocol agreement and ability to predict liver-related mortality. Hepatology 2011; 53: 187482. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2012; 36: 290-295 293 ª 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Invited Commentaries

Commentary: new tools to assess hepatic steatosis – what do we want to measure?

  • Upload
    z-yu

  • View
    213

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

3. Chow DK, Sung JJ. Is the prevalence of idiopathic ulcers reallyon the increase? Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 4:176–7.

4. McColl KE. Helicobacter pylori-negative nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-negative ulcer. Gastroenterol Clin North Am2009; 38: 353–61.

Commentary: new tools to assess hepaticsteatosis – what do we want to measure?Z. Yu*,†,‡ & V. W.-S. Wong*,†

*Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University ofHong Kong, Hong Kong, China.†Institute of Digestive Disease, The Chinese University of Hong Kong,Hong Kong, China.‡Department of Liver Disease, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated toShanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.E-mail: [email protected]

doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2012.05168.x

We read with great interest the article by Permutt et al. thatdemonstrated the use of proton density-fat fraction (PDFF)by magnetic resonance imaging to measure hepatic steato-sis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease(NAFLD).1 In addition, patients with cirrhosis had less steato-sis than noncirrhotic patients by both PDFF and histology.

The latter finding has major clinical implications. AsNAFLD progresses towards cirrhosis and end-stage liverdisease, hepatic steatosis often decreases or disappears.2

In fact, NAFLD is believed to be the most common causeof cryptogenic cirrhosis.3 Decrease in hepatic steatosisthus cannot be taken as evidence of disease improvement.

How should we interpret steatosis results then? At theclinic setting, one may look for other risk factors of diseaseprogression. For example, if a patient is nondiabetic andachieves weight reduction, a reduction in hepatic steatosismost likely represents genuine improvement.2, 4 On theother hand, for future clinical research using non-invasivetests only, steatosis results should be supplemented bymarkers of necroinflammation and fibrosis.5, 6

Moreover, this study did not include a control groupwithout NAFLD. Future studies are required to evaluatethe accuracy of PDFF in diagnosing NAFLD. It would alsobe important to compare PDFF with other state-of-the-artnon-invasive tests of steatosis like proton-magnetic reso-nance spectroscopy and dual gradient echo magneticresonance imaging.7, 8

In conclusion, new and promising tools for the mea-surement of hepatic steatosis have been developed in thepast few years. These tests will likely have a majorimpact on future research and practice. At the end ofthe day, the ultimate test would be whether these investi-gations predict clinical outcomes such as cirrhosis, hepa-tocellular carcinoma and cardiovascular complications.9

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTDeclaration of personal interests: Vincent Wong hasserved in the advisory boards of Novartis, Roche, Gileadand Otsuka, and received paid lecture fees from AbbottDiagnostics, Novartis, Roche and Echosens. Declarationof funding interests: None.

REFERENCES

1. Permutt Z, Le T-A, Peterson MR, et al. Correlation between liverhistology and novel magnetic resonance imaging in adult patientswith non-alcoholic fatty liver disease - MRI accurately quantifieshepatic steatosis in NAFLD. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2012; 36:22–9.

2. Wong VW, Wong GL, Choi PC, et al. Disease progression ofnon-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a prospective study with pairedliver biopsies at 3 years. Gut 2010; 59: 969–74.

3. Caldwell SH, Oelsner DH, Iezzoni JC, et al. Cryptogenic cirrhosis:clinical characterization and risk factors for underlying disease.Hepatology 1999; 29: 664–9.

4. Wong VW, Hui AY, Tsang SW, et al. Prevalence of undiagnoseddiabetes and postchallenge hyperglycaemia in Chinese patientswith non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther2006; 24: 1215–22.

5. Shen J, Chan HL, Wong GL, et al. Non-invasive diagnosis ofnon-alcoholic steatohepatitis by combined serum biomarkers.J Hepatol 2012; 56: 1363–70.

6. Wong VW, Vergniol J, Wong GL, et al. Diagnosis of fibrosis andcirrhosis using liver stiffness measurement in nonalcoholic fattyliver disease. Hepatology 2010; 51: 454–62.

7. Lee SS, Park SH, Kim HJ, et al. Non-invasive assessment ofhepatic steatosis: prospective comparison of the accuracy ofimaging examinations. J Hepatol 2010; 52: 579–85.

8. Wong VW, Wong GL, Tsang SW, et al. High prevalence ofcolorectal neoplasm in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.Gut 2011; 60: 829–36.

9. Younossi ZM, Stepanova M, Rafiq N, et al. Pathologic criteria fornonalcoholic steatohepatitis: interprotocol agreement and abilityto predict liver-related mortality. Hepatology 2011; 53: 1874–82.

Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2012; 36: 290-295 293

ª 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Invited Commentaries