1
COMMENTARY CORRELATION BETWEEN THE INDIVIDUAL AND THE COMBINED WIDTH OF THE SIX MAXILLARY ANTERIOR TEETH Vishnu Raj, BDS, MSFS, MS* This study by Gonçalves and colleagues evaluates the correlation between the individual and combined widths of the maxillary anterior teeth. As suggested by the authors, the selection of denture teeth based on tooth width often presents a conundrum in terms of establishing esthetic proportions for successive widths of the maxillary anterior dentition. In this study, casts fabricated from poly vinyl siloxane impressions made of 69 undergraduate Brazilian dental students (17–33 years of age) were used to facilitate measurements. Digital calipers were used to measure individual tooth widths of the maxillary anterior teeth, and the combined width of the maxillary anterior teeth was calculated by adding all the individual tooth widths. The authors added the widths of each anterior tooth and its antimer to establish the percentage of the anterior portion of the maxillary arch occu- pied by each tooth type. Relative to the anterior portion of the maxillary arch, the intra-arch tooth width proportions of the maxillary central incisors, lateral incisors, and canines represented 38, 29, and 33%, respectively. This study did not account for variability in arch forms, which may range from tapering to square. Although the authors alluded to the significance of these proportions, in creating an esthetic result, the inclusion criteria for the study sample make no mention of any esthetic evaluation as a part of the sample selection process. Therefore, the esthetic import of this proportion remains unknown. As a topic for future research, these proportions could be digitally manipulated to establish esthetic preferences among different groups, similar to the study conducted by Ward. 1 In conclusion, this study presents a useful statistic of maxillary anterior tooth width proportions, and these data may be used in conjunction with other parameters such as width : height ratios, in the rehabilitation of partially edentulous Brazilian patients. REFERENCE 1. Ward DH. A study of dentists’ preferred maxillary anterior tooth width proportions: comparing the recurring esthetic dental proportion to other mathematical and naturally occurring proportions. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007;19:324–37. *Graduate student, University of Texas at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX, USA RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ANTERIOR TEETH WIDTHS © 2009, COPYRIGHT THE AUTHORS JOURNAL COMPILATION © 2009, WILEY PERIODICALS, INC. DOI 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2009.00253.x VOLUME 21, NUMBER 3, 2009 192

COMMENTARY. correlation between the individual and the combined width of the six maxillary anterior teeth

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: COMMENTARY. correlation between the individual and the combined width of the six maxillary anterior teeth

COMMENTARY

C O R R E L AT I O N B E T W E E N T H E I N D I V I D U A L A N D T H E C O M B I N E D W I D T H O F T H E S I X M A X I L L A RY

A N T E R I O R T E E T H j e r d _ 2 5 3 1 9 2

V i s h n u R a j , B D S , M S F S , M S *

This study by Gonçalves and colleagues evaluates the correlation between the individual and combined widths ofthe maxillary anterior teeth. As suggested by the authors, the selection of denture teeth based on tooth width oftenpresents a conundrum in terms of establishing esthetic proportions for successive widths of the maxillary anteriordentition. In this study, casts fabricated from poly vinyl siloxane impressions made of 69 undergraduate Braziliandental students (17–33 years of age) were used to facilitate measurements.

Digital calipers were used to measure individual tooth widths of the maxillary anterior teeth, and the combined widthof the maxillary anterior teeth was calculated by adding all the individual tooth widths. The authors added the widthsof each anterior tooth and its antimer to establish the percentage of the anterior portion of the maxillary arch occu-pied by each tooth type. Relative to the anterior portion of the maxillary arch, the intra-arch tooth width proportionsof the maxillary central incisors, lateral incisors, and canines represented 38, 29, and 33%, respectively.

This study did not account for variability in arch forms, which may range from tapering to square. Although theauthors alluded to the significance of these proportions, in creating an esthetic result, the inclusion criteria forthe study sample make no mention of any esthetic evaluation as a part of the sample selection process. Therefore,the esthetic import of this proportion remains unknown.

As a topic for future research, these proportions could be digitally manipulated to establish esthetic preferencesamong different groups, similar to the study conducted by Ward.1 In conclusion, this study presents a useful statisticof maxillary anterior tooth width proportions, and these data may be used in conjunction with other parameters suchas width : height ratios, in the rehabilitation of partially edentulous Brazilian patients.

R E F E R E N C E

1. Ward DH. A study of dentists’ preferred maxillary anterior tooth width proportions: comparing the recurring esthetic dental proportionto other mathematical and naturally occurring proportions. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007;19:324–37.

*Graduate student, University of Texas at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX, USA

R E L AT I O N S H I P B E T W E E N A N T E R I O R T E E T H W I D T H S

© 2 0 0 9 , C O P Y R I G H T T H E A U T H O R SJ O U R N A L C O M P I L AT I O N © 2 0 0 9 , W I L E Y P E R I O D I C A L S , I N C .DOI 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2009.00253.x V O L U M E 2 1 , N U M B E R 3 , 2 0 0 9192