Comment. - Rushcliffe€¦ · Comment. Consultee Mrs Emma Brook (1218322) Email Address Company / Organisation Nottinghamshire County Council Address Event Name Local Plan Part 2

Comment.

Mrs Emma Brook (1218322)Consultee

Email Address

Nottinghamshire County CouncilCompany / Organisation

Address

Local Plan Part 2 Proposed ModificationsEvent Name

Nottinghamshire County Council (Mrs Emma Brook- 1218322)

Comment by

17Comment ID

02/07/19 14:38Response Date

SubmittedStatus

WebSubmission Type

0.1Version

Main ModificationsPlease specify whether this representation relatesto the Main Modifications, Additional Modificationsor Policies Map Modifications

Which modification number does this representationrelate to?

MM08

Policy 3.2 Land off Lantern Lane, East LeakeWhat section or policy?

YesDo you consider the proposed modification to belegally compliant?

YesDo you consider the proposed modification tocomply with the duty to co-operate?

What makes a Local Plan “sound”?

Positively prepared - the plan should be prepared in a way that meets the need for housing and otherdevelopment, including infrastructure and business development.Justified – the plan should be based on evidence, and be the most appropriate strategy for the boroughwhen considered against other reasonable alternatives.Effective – the plan should be deliverable; the housing and other development should be capable ofbeing carried out.

Powered by Objective Online 4.2 - page 1

Consistent with national policy – the plan should enable sustainable development and be consistentwith the policies in the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

YesDo you consider the proposed modification to besound?

Do you consider the proposed modification to beunsound becuase it is NOT: (please tick all thatapply)

Please set out your reasons for your answers to the earlier questions.You may also use this box ifyou wish to make representations on one of the proposed Modifications supporting documents (e.g.Sustainability Appraisal Addendum, Habitat Regulations Assessment Addendum or Equalities ImpactAssessment Addendum).

n/a

Please set out what further change(s) you consider necessary to make the proposed Modificationlegally compliant or sound.You will need to say why this change will make the Local Plan Part 2legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you could put forward your suggested revised wordingof any policy or text. Please be as precise as possible. (If you are suggesting that the Local Plan Part2 is legally compliant or sound please state "not applicable")

In relations to Main Modification 8, which introduces a new housing allocation at Land off Lantern Lanein East Leake to recognise the recent granted planning permission, in terms of Minerals, the CountyCouncil welcomes the inclusion within the development requirement text that a detailed geotechnicaland mining study should be undertaken to ensure an acceptable buffer between the gypsum miningoperations and the development. This acknowledges the nearby mineral extraction and addressesPolicy SP8 in the Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan (July 2018).

Please indicate if you wish to be notified that:(please tick all that apply)

The recommendations of the PlanningInspector appointed to carry out theindependent examination have beenpublished.The Local Plan Part 2 has been adopted


Comment.


Email Address


Address



Comment by

18Comment ID


SubmittedStatus

WebSubmission Type

0.1Version


Which modification number does thisrepresentation relate to?

MM19

Policy 5.1 Land north of Nottingham Road, RadcliffeWhat section or policy?










n/a


The County Council has raised concerns in pervious consultation stages which do not appear to havebeen addressed within MM15.The allocated site for development is approximately, at its closest extent,650m North-East of the active composting facility off Stragglethorpe Road. Since the composting facilityis open air and being of a type that emits significant amounts of bioaerosols, even though the allocatedsite may be a considerable distance from the waste facility, our monitoring officers have highlightedthat, on occasion, odour may be detectable at the allocated site. The County Council therefore advised,and continues to, that in accordance with Nottinghamshire and Nottingham Waste Core StrategyPolicy WCS10 (safeguarding waste management sites), that it be noted in respect of this allocationthat the design of housing on this site (their orientation and placement within the allocation) be in amanner that provides as large a buffer as possible to the waste facility, as in doing so it may be possibleto accommodate non-waste development in these locations. In line with the accompanying text forWCS10 this could be possible through, for example, making changes to the proposed layout of anyhousing or mixed-use scheme and use of parking or landscaping areas to provide a buffer zone.

The amendments to Policy 5:1 do not take into consideration the above comments and the CountyCouncil would advise that Rushcliffe Borough Council do consider the waste management facility andconsider how any potential environmental impacts could be limited at the proposed residential sitethrough landscaping and layout and so prevent the sterilisation of a permitted waste managementfacility as per Policy WCS10 in the Nottinghamshire and Nottingham Waste Core Strategy, which formspart of Rushcliffe’s Local Development Framework.


The recommendations of the PlanningInspector appointed to carry out theindependent examination have been published.The Local Plan Part 2 has been adopted


Comment.


Email Address


Address



Comment by

19Comment ID


SubmittedStatus

WebSubmission Type

0.1Version


Which modification number does thisrepresentation relate to?

MM19

Policy 5.6 The Paddocks, Nottingham Road,Radcliffe

What section or policy?




Positively prepared - the plan should be prepared in a way that meets the need for housing and otherdevelopment, including infrastructure and business development.Justified – the plan should be based on evidence, and be the most appropriate strategy for the boroughwhen considered against other reasonable alternatives.


Effective – the plan should be deliverable; the housing and other development should be capable ofbeing carried out.Consistent with national policy – the plan should enable sustainable development and be consistentwith the policies in the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).




n/a


The County Council has raised concerns in pervious consultation stages which do not appear to havebeen addressed within MM19.The allocated site for development is approximately, at its closest extent,930m North-East of the active composting facility off Stragglethorpe Road. Since the composting facilityis open air and being of a type that emits significant amounts of bioaerosols, even though the allocatedsite may be a considerable distance from the waste facility, our monitoring officers have highlightedthat, on occasion, odour may be detectable at the allocated site. The County Council therefore advisedand continues to advise that, in accordance with Nottinghamshire and Nottingham Waste Core StrategyPolicy WCS10 (safeguarding waste management sites), that it be noted in respect of this allocationthat the design of housing on this site (their orientation and placement within the allocation) be in amanner that provides as large a buffer as possible to the waste facility, as in doing so it may be possibleto accommodate non-waste development in these locations. In line with the accompanying text forWCS10 this could be possible through, for example, making changes to the proposed layout of anyhousing or mixed-use scheme and use of parking or landscaping areas to provide a buffer zone.

The amendments to Policy 5:6 do not take into consideration the above comments and the CountyCouncil would advise that Rushcliffe Borough Council do consider the waste management facility andconsider how any potential environmental impacts could be limited at the proposed residential sitethrough landscaping and layout and so prevent the sterilisation of a permitted waste managementfacility as per Policy WCS10 in the Nottinghamshire and Nottingham Waste Core Strategy, which formspart of Rushcliffe’s Local Development Framework.


The recommendations of the PlanningInspector appointed to carry out theindependent examination have been published.The Local Plan Part 2 has been adopted


Comment.

Consultee

Email Address

Company / Organisation

Address

Event Name

Mrs Emma Brook (1218322)

Nottinghamshire County Council

Local Plan Part 2 Proposed Modifications

Nottinghamshire County Council (Mrs Emma

Brook - 1218322)Comment by

16Comment ID


SubmittedStatus

WebSubmission Type

0.1Version

Rushcliffe 2018 Health Profile.pdfFiles

Main ModificationsPlease specify whether this representation relates to the MainModifications, Additional Modifications or Policies MapModifications

Which modification number does this representation relate to? MM50

Policy 39 Health Impacts of DevelopmentWhat section or policy?

YesDo you consider the proposed modification to be legallycompliant?

YesDo you consider the proposed modification to comply with theduty to co-operate?


Positively prepared - the plan should be prepared in a way that meets the need for housing and other development, includinginfrastructure and business development.Justified – the plan should be based on evidence, and be the most appropriate strategy for the borough when considered againstother reasonable alternatives.Effective – the plan should be deliverable; the housing and other development should be capable of being carried out.


Consistent with national policy – the plan should enable sustainable development and be consistent with the policies in the NationalPlanning Policy Framework (NPPF).

YesDo you consider the proposed modification to be sound?

Do you consider the proposed modification to be unsoundbecuase it is NOT: (please tick all that apply)

Please set out your reasons for your answers to the earlier questions.You may also use this box if you wish to make representationson one of the proposed Modifications supporting documents (e.g. Sustainability Appraisal Addendum, Habitat RegulationsAssessment Addendum or Equalities Impact Assessment Addendum).

n/a

Rushcliffe 2018 Health Profile.pdfPlease attach any supporting files here

Please set out what further change(s) you consider necessary to make the proposed Modification legally compliant or sound.Youwill need to say why this change will make the Local Plan Part 2 legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you could putforward your suggested revised wording of any policy or text. Please be as precise as possible. (If you are suggesting that theLocal Plan Part 2 is legally compliant or sound please state "not applicable")

Policy 39: Health impacts of development

PHE Healthy Places has highlighted in a recent Introduction to planning for health and Healthy Places support seminar stated thatHealth Impact Assessments (HIA’s) allow for a systematic and specific process for enhancing benefits of health and wellbeing in thedevelopment management process and have cited councils that have adopted this approach including Wakefield.. (see embeddedlink for further details).

In regards to the rationale for 50 dwellings, the first stage of the HIA is screening where a decision is made about whether to requesta HIA and this is where the statement to provide a number of dwellings is useful to provide as a benchmark¹. Evidence suggests`that planning policies needs to be clear as to when an HIA is required and a screening checklist/ process(such as the NottinghamshireHealth Impact Assessment Checklist) is used so that the decision is robust and also so that across an organisation a measure ofconsistency regarding HIA can be achieved ¹’ Therefore the statement to provide a number of dwellings in this instants 50 dwellingsis deemed as the required `measure of consistency’ supports the initial statements in Policy 39 within in Rushcliffe LDP.

Reference

¹ Cave B, `Assessing the Potential Health effects of Policies, Plans, Programmes and Projects ‘eds Barton H, Thompson S, BurgessS and Grant M in The Routledge Handbook of Planning for Health and Wellbeing.2015, chap 26 pp374-378.

13.1 reference should be updated and refer to the publication of Nottinghamshire Spatial Planning and Health Framework 2019-2022.https://www.nottinghamshire.gov.uk/planning-and-environment/planning-and-health-framework/planning-and-health-framework-2019-2022

13.3 reference made to Rushcliffe Health Profile 2016 needs to refer to 2018 Rushcliffe Health Profile (attached) and reflect the abovecomment.

Please indicate if you wish to be notified that: (please tick all thatapply)

The recommendations of the Planning Inspector appointed tocarry out the independent examination have been published.The Local Plan Part 2 has been adopted


RushcliffeDistrict This profile was published on 3 July 2018

Local Authority Health Profile 2018

0km 6km 12km

Contains National Statistics data © Crown copyright and database right 2018Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2018

Map data © 2018 GoogleLocal authority displayed with ultra−generalised clipped boundary

For more information on priorities in this area, see:• www.nottinghamshire.gov.uk• http://nottinghamshireinsight.org.uk

Visit www.healthprofiles.info for more area profiles,more information and interactive maps and tools.

Local Authority Health Profiles are Official Statisticsand are produced based on the three pillars of theCode of Practice for Statistics: Trustworthiness,Quality and Value.

Follow @PHE_uk on Twitter

This profile gives a picture of people’s health in Rush-cliffe. It is designed to help local government andhealth services understand their community’s needs,so that they can work together to improve people’shealth and reduce health inequalities.

Health in summaryThe health of people in Rushcliffe is generally betterthan the England average. Rushcliffe is one of the20% least deprived districts/unitary authorities in Eng-land, however about 7% (1,200) of children live in lowincome families. Life expectancy for both men andwomen is higher than the England average.

Health inequalitiesLife expectancy is 4.5 years lower for men and 5.0years lower for women in the most deprived areas ofRushcliffe than in the least deprived areas.**

Child healthIn Year 6, 11.0% (127) of children are classified asobese, better than the average for England. Levelsof teenage pregnancy, GCSE attainment, breastfeed-ing initiation and smoking at time of delivery are betterthan the England average.

Adult healthEstimated levels of adult physical activity are betterthan the England average. The rate of people killedand seriously injured on roads is worse than aver-age. Rates of sexually transmitted infections and TBare better than average. Rates of violent crime, earlydeaths from cardiovascular diseases and early deathsfrom cancer are better than average.

* rate per 100,000 population

** see page 3

© Crown Copyright 2018 1 Rushcliffe - 3 July 2018

http://www.nottinghamshire.gov.uk

http://nottinghamshireinsight.org.uk

http://www.healthprofiles.info

https://www.statisticsauthority.gov.uk/code-of-practice/the-code/

http://www.twitter.com/PHE_uk

Population

0−45−9

10−1415−1920−2425−2930−3435−3940−4445−4950−5455−5960−6465−6970−7475−7980−8485−89

90+

4 2 0 2 4% of total population

England 2016

Rushcliffe 2020projection

Rushcliffe 2016(Male)

Rushcliffe 2016(Female)

Age profile Understanding the sociodemographic profile of an area isimportant when planning services. Different population groupsmay have different health and social care needs and are likelyto interact with services in different ways.

Rushcliffe(persons)

115Population (2016)*

England(persons)

118Projected population (2020)*

20.6%% population aged under 18

20.7%% population aged 65+

5.3%% people from an ethnic minority group

55,268

56,705

21.3%

17.9%

13.6%

* thousands

Source:Populations: Office for National Statistics licensed under the OpenGovernment LicenceEthnic minority groups: Annual Population Survey, October 2015 to September2016

Deprivation

The level of deprivation in an area can be used to identify those communities who may be in the greatest need of services. Thesemaps and charts show the Index of Multiple Deprivation 2015 (IMD 2015).

National Local

The first of the two maps shows differences in deprivation in this area based onnational comparisons, using national quintiles (fifths) of IMD 2015, shown by lowersuper output area. The darkest coloured areas are some of the most deprivedneighbourhoods in England.

The second map shows the differences indeprivation based on local quintiles (fifths)of IMD 2015 for this area.

The chart shows the percentage of the population who live in areas at each level ofdeprivation.

Rushcliffe

England

0 25 50 75 100% Residents

Most deprivedquintile

Least deprivedquintile

Lines represent electoral wards (2017). Quintiles shown for 2011 based lower super output areas (LSOAs). Contains OS data © Crown copyright and databaserights 2018. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0


Health inequalities: life expectancy

The charts show life expectancy for males and females within this local authority for 2014-16. The local authorityis divided into local deciles (tenths) by deprivation (IMD 2015). The life expectancy gap is the difference betweenthe top and bottom of the inequality slope. This represents the range in years of life expectancy from most toleast deprived within this area. If there was no inequality in life expectancy the line would be horizontal.

Life expectancy gap for males: 4.5 years Life expectancy gap for females: 5.0 years

Most deprived Least deprived Most deprived Least deprived

70

80

90

70

80

90

Life

exp

ecta

ncy

at b

irth

(yea

rs)

Life expectancy for males Life expectancy for females Inequality slope for males Inequality slope for females

Trends over time: under 75 mortality

These charts provide a comparison of the trends in death rates in people under 75 between this area and England.For deaths from all causes, they also show the trends in themost deprived and least deprived local quintiles (fifths)of this area.

IMD 2010 IMD 2015 IMD 2010 IMD 2015

Under 75 mortality: heart disease and stroke Under 75 mortality: cancer

Under 75 mortality rate: all causes, males Under 75 mortality rate: all causes, females

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150

500

1000

1500

0

50

100

150

200

250

0

500

1000

1500

0

50

100

150

200

250

Years

Age

−st

anda

rdis

ed r

ate

per

100,

000

popu

latio

n

England average Local average Local least deprived Local most deprived Local inequality

Data from 2010-12 onwards have been revised to use IMD 2015 to define local deprivation quintiles (fifths), all prior time points use IMD 2010. In doing this, areas are grouped into deprivation quintiles usingthe Index of Multiple Deprivation which most closely aligns with the time period of the data. This provides a more accurate way of examining changes over time by deprivation.

Data points are the midpoints of three year averages of annual rates, for example 2005 represents the period 2004 to 2006. Where data are missing for local least or most deprived, the value could not becalculated as the number of cases is too small.


Health summary for Rushcliffe

The chart below shows how the health of people in this area compares with the rest of England. This area’s value for eachindicator is shown as a circle. The England average is shown by the red line, which is always at the centre of the chart. Therange of results for all local areas in England is shown as a grey bar. A red circle means that this area is significantly worsethan England for that indicator. However, a green circle may still indicate an important public health problem.

83.7 74.2

86.8 79.4

215.2 545.7

42.3 141.3

99.1 195.3

4.6 18.3

79.5

83.1

333.8

73.5

136.8

9.9

81.7

85.0

254.9

51.1

123.1

7.7

n a

n a

807

161

392

24

2014 − 16

2014 − 16

2014 − 16

2014 − 16

2014 − 16

2014 − 16

1 Life expectancy at birth (Male)

2 Life expectancy at birth (Female)

3 Under 75 mortality rate: all causes

4 Under 75 mortality rate: cardiovascular

5 Under 75 mortality rate: cancer

6 Suicide rate

61.9 39.3

96.3 54.3

90.8 45.1

13.5 110.4

50.6 578.9

364.7 854.2

52.6

77.1

67.9

39.7

185.3

575.0

60.3

71.7

75.2

48.0

*93

*93

307

n a

1,212

165

*93

*93

2016

2017

2017

2014 − 16

2016/17

2016/17

10 Cancer diagnosed at early stage

11 Diabetes diagnoses (aged 17+)

12 Dementia diagnoses (aged 65+)

7 Killed and seriously injured on roads

8 Hospital stays for self−harm

9 Hip fractures in older people (aged 65+)

6.5 100.0

388.2 1,151.1

4.6 24.8

78.8 53.3

40.5 74.9

34.2

636.4

14.9

66.0

61.3

*93

*93

9.7

72.4

63.3

*93

*93

8,880

n a

n a

2014/15 −16/17

2016/17

2017

2016/17

2016/17

13 Alcohol−specific hospital stays (under 18s)

14 Alcohol−related harm hospital stays

15 Smoking prevalence in adults (aged 18+)

16 Physically active adults (aged 19+)

17 Excess weight in adults (aged 18+)

3.3 36.7

2.3 28.1

96.7 37.9

0.0 7.9

8.8 29.2

18.8

10.7

74.5

3.9

20.0

11.8

4.4

83.6

1.6

11.0

23

45

836

5

127

2016

2016/17

2016/17

2014 − 16

2016/17

18 Under 18 conceptions

19 Smoking status at time of delivery

20 Breastfeeding initiation

21 Infant mortality rate

22 Obese children (aged 10−11)

5.0 42.0

5.1 48.7

21.8

25.7

7.7

23.3

n a

n a

2015

2017

23 Deprivation score (IMD 2015)24 Smoking prevalence: routine and manual occupations

5.7 30.5

78.7 44.8

88.5 59.8

5.7 42.2

16.8

57.8

74.4

0.8

20.0

6.6

77.2

77.4

*1

10.9^59

1,235

864

54,200

*1

*59

2015

2015/16

2016/17

2016/17

2016/17

25 Children in low income families (under 16s)

26 GCSEs achieved

27 Employment rate (aged 16−64)

28 Statutory homelessness

29 Violent crime (violence offences)

6.3 30.3

266.6 3,215.3

0.0 69.0

17.9

793.8

10.9

24.8

402.5

2.6

234

288

9

Aug 2013 −Jul 2016

2017

2014 − 16

30 Excess winter deaths

31 New sexually transmitted infections

32 New cases of tuberculosis

Life

exp

ecta

ncy

and

caus

esof

dea

th

Inju

ries

and

ill h

ealth

Beh

avio

ural

ris

kfa

ctor

sC

hild

heal

thIn

equa

−lit

ies

Wid

erde

term

inan

tsof

hea

lth

Hea

lthpr

otec

tion

Indicator names PeriodLocalcount

Localvalue

Eng value

Eng worst

Engbest

For full details on each indicator, see the definitions tab of the Health Profiles online tool: www.healthprofiles.info

Indicator value types1, 2 Life expectancy - Years 3, 4, 5 Directly age-standardised rate per 100,000 population aged under 75 6 Directly age-standardised rate per 100,000 population aged 10 and over 7 Crude rate per 100,000population 8 Directly age-standardised rate per 100,000 population 9 Directly age-standardised rate per 100,000 population aged 65 and over 10 Proportion - % of cancers diagnosed at stage 1 or 2 11Proportion - % recorded diagnosis of diabetes as a proportion of the estimated number with diabetes 12 Proportion - % recorded diagnosis of dementia as a proportion of the estimated number with dementia13 Crude rate per 100,000 population aged under 18 14 Directly age-standardised rate per 100,000 population 15, 16, 17 Proportion - % 18 Crude rate per 1,000 females aged 15 to 17 19, 20 Proportion- % 21 Crude rate per 1,000 live births 22 Proportion - % 23 Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) 2015 score 24, 25 Proportion - % 26 Proportion - % 5 A*-C including English & Maths 27 Proportion - % 28Crude rate per 1,000 households 29 Crude rate per 1,000 population 30 Ratio of excess winter deaths to average of non-winter deaths (%) 31 Crude rate per 100,000 population aged 15 to 64 (excludingChlamydia) 32 Crude rate per 100,000 population

€“Regional” refers to the former government regions.*1 Value suppressed for disclosure control due to small count *59 Value for the community safety partnership in which the LA lies *93 Value is not presented due to an issue with HES coding in NottinghamUniversity Hospitals Trust in 2016/17, for which over 30% of records did not have a valid geography of residence assigned. In 2015/16, over 20% of patients that attended hospital from this area were treatedat Nottingham University Hospitals Trust. ^59 Value for the community safety partnership in which the LA lies

If 25% or more of areas have no data then the England range is not displayed. Please send any enquiries to [email protected]

Youmay re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of theOpenGovernment Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3


https://www.healthprofiles.info

mailto:[email protected]

http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/

http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/

Comment.


Email Address


Address



Comment by

20Comment ID


SubmittedStatus

WebSubmission Type

0.1Version


Which modification number does this representationrelate to?

MM52

Policy 42 Safeguarding MineralsWhat section or policy?










n/a


In relation to Main Modification 52, which amends policy 42: Safeguarding minerals, the County Council,from a minerals perspective, welcomes the inclusion of encouraging prior extraction in Mineralsafeguarding areas where practical and feasible. This is in line with Local Policy, SP8 in the DraftNottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan (July 2018) and the National Policy Planning Framework(paragraph 204, part d). Also, the inclusion of Mineral Safeguarding Area Map in Figure 11 is one ofthe ways the Planning Practice Guidance (paragraph 005, 2014) recommends how District and BoroughCouncils can play a role in safeguarding minerals and so the County Council also welcomes this mapbeing within the Rushcliffe’s Local Plan Part Two.


The recommendations of the PlanningInspector appointed to carry out theindependent examination have beenpublished.The Local Plan Part 2 has been adopted


1

John King

From:Sent:To:Cc:Subject:

Ross Marshall 23 May 2019 13:41LocaldevelopmentSue Jaques; Hardeep RaiLocal Plan Pt 2 Modifications

Please find our comments on the recent consultation documents:

1) Paragraph d) of MM25 below will be difficult to comply with as you do not define new or existing. Suggestthe following wording: “Sustainable drainage measures should be used to help ensure the development isnot at risk of surface water flooding and does not increase the risk of flooding to the surrounding areas”

2) The paragraph shown below is not specific enough and may not ensure protection of new properties.Suggest the second sentence reads: “Therefore development of this allocation should ensure all newproperties are not put at risk of surface water flooding and the development does not increase the risk offlooding to surrounding areas.

1218322

2

3) MM32. Add the following sentence. “Under no circumstances will surface water from any development bepermitted to be discharged to a fould sewer”

I trust this is of use, please contact me direct should you need any further information

regards

Ross Marshall Principal Flood Risk Management Officer

The following message has been applied automatically, to promote news and information from Nottinghamshire County Council about events and services:

Did you know you could foster part time? We are looking for people across the county who can foster children on weekends and in school holidays, by becoming support carers. Find out more.

Nottinghamshire County Council is committed to protecting your privacy and ensuring all personal information is kept confidential and safe – for more details see https://www.nottinghamshire.gov.uk/global-content/privacy

Emails and any attachments from Nottinghamshire County Council are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to the email, and then delete it without making copies or using it in any other way. Senders and recipients of email should be aware that, under the Data Protection Act 2018 and the Freedom of Information Act 2000, the contents may have to be disclosed in response to a request.

Although any attachments to the message will have been checked for viruses before transmission, you are urged to carry out your own virus check before opening attachments, since the County Council accepts no responsibility for loss or damage caused by software viruses. You can view our privacy notice at: https://www.nottinghamshire.gov.uk/global-content/privacy

Nottinghamshire County Council Legal Disclaimer.

3

The following message has been applied automatically, to promote news and information from Nottinghamshire County Council about events and services:

Did you know you could foster part time? We are looking for people across the county who can foster children on weekends and in school holidays, by becoming support carers. Find out more.

Nottinghamshire County Council is committed to protecting your privacy and ensuring all personal information is kept confidential and safe – for more details see https://www.nottinghamshire.gov.uk/global-content/privacy

Emails and any attachments from Nottinghamshire County Council are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to the email, and then delete it without making copies or using it in any other way. Senders and recipients of email should be aware that, under the Data Protection Act 2018 and the Freedom of Information Act 2000, the contents may have to be disclosed in response to a request.

Although any attachments to the message will have been checked for viruses before transmission, you are urged to carry out your own virus check before opening attachments, since the County Council accepts no responsibility for loss or damage caused by software viruses. You can view our privacy notice at: https://www.nottinghamshire.gov.uk/global-content/privacy

Nottinghamshire County Council Legal Disclaimer.

Documents

Comment. - Rushcliffe€¦ · Comment. Consultee Mrs Emma Brook (1218322) Email Address Company / Organisation Nottinghamshire County Council Address Event Name Local Plan Part 2