RDML (Sel) Dave Gale9 February 2011

Commander, Navy Regional Maintenance Command

Prepared for : JINII Planning Session

Change is Needed

• VADM McCoy’s Task to develop a comprehensive Assessment and Sustainment Process

• Fleet Readiness Panel / Study of Surface Community, identification of areas for improvement

• Success of SSLCM organization, realization that we needed more (SURFMEPP)

• Command changes resulting in CNRMC

• TYCOM / CLASSRON Organization changes

Many sources of “motivation” for these changes…

22 February 2011

“…We are on track to reverse these (negative) trends in two years…”

Admiral John C. Harvey, Jr.

Testimony to HASC (Subcommittee on Readiness)

28 July 2010

32 February 2011

Agenda

2 February 2011 4

• Stand-up of Navy Regional Maintenance Command

• Contracts Governance

• Surface Ship Readiness Initiatives (“5 Big Rocks”)

• Summary

Navy Regional Maintenance Command

Stand Up – 15 DEC 2010

52 February 2011

Global Organization

• of a Global RMC Organization that operates in a consistent manner utilizing increasingly common processes.

• of a Global RMC Organization that will have an effective centrally monitored business, manning and operations plan that supports the entire organization.

• of a Global RMC Organization that enables each RMC to be responsive to their assigned ships with regard to the planning and execution of maintenance and modernization AND that our collective performance measures will show that responsiveness.

“The Vision…”

Act on ADM Harvey’s challenge to be a stronger partner.

62 February 2011

ECH IV

ECH I

ECH II

ECH III

Alignment

CNO

CPFBSO 70

FFCBSO 60

SEA 04SEA 21

PHNSY + IMF

PSNSY+ IMF NNSY PNSYSURFMEPPCNSP CNSL

SERMCSWRMC NSSA

C400

Req

uire

men

ts

Gen

erat

ion

Process

Execution C101

SEA 04X

CNRMC

NAVSEABSO 24

72 February 2011

Organizational Structure

CommanderRDML N00

Deputy Commander

N100B

Technical Director

N200

Operations Director

N300

Budget & Finance Director

N600

Plans, Policy & Evaluation

Director

N1200

Maintenance DirectorWest Coast

N100W

Maintenance DirectorEast Coast

N100E

Admin Director

N1100

82 February 2011

Contracts Governance

92 February 2011

• Proper alignment of contracting actions

• Ensures contracts are solicited by Navy contracting officers

• Improved contracting Situational Awareness

• Vector approved contracting actions to proper PCO chain

• Ensure balance between MSMO and IDIQ contracts

Benefits

Contracts Governance

• Comprehensive Contracting and Depot Work Integration for Non Nuclear Shipboard Maintenance and Modernization Guidelines

– All work must go through the NSA for assignment to the lead maintenance activities (LMAs: NSYs & MSMOs)

– LMAs responsible for all availability work coordination and integration.– NSAs shall assign industrial production work based on cost, scheduling,

and capability (this may be the LMA or an alternate provider)

2 February 2011 10

• Consolidate RMC processes to manage & execute MSMO contracts

• Manage total portfolio of contracts that exist on each waterfront, search for duplicity and consolidate into common instruments

Expectation

Surface Ship Readiness Initiative (SSRI)

112 February 2011

Sustainment Program

SURFMEPP

RMC Capacity/Capability

Avail Execution/

Work Certification

Assessment Plan/Policy

SSRI “5 Big Rocks”

2 February 2011 12Gaps identified

Need for Integrated Assessment Program

Need for Integrated Sustainment Program

• Improved maintenance material management • Improved engineering rigor in work package

development• Availability schedule milestones• Maintenance and modernization integration• Establish appropriate avail type, schedule,

duration• QA oversight

SURFMEPP: Stood up 8 Nov 2010 to address scope limitations of SSLCM

End to End Process

• Roadmap to a coordinated plan• Improvement of processes• Coordinate roles and responsibilities between

government & industry partners

Objectives of End to End Process

• “I” Level• Operate IAW JFMM

Reconstitution of RMC Capacity/Capability

No Existing Avail Completion/Work Certification Process

Pilot Ship Schedule

Enhance ESL & improve Readiness on every hull

Ship

Hom

epor

t

Avai

l Typ

e

Star

t Dat

e

End

Dat

e

End-

to-E

nd

Proc

ess

Posi

tion

Ass

essm

ent

Prog

ram

Avai

l Ex

&

Wor

k C

ert

Sust

ainm

ent P

rogr

am

RM

C

Man

ning

SUR

FMEP

P

LSD 43 Norfolk EDPMA 5/10/2010 3/7/2011 Complete

LPD 17 Norfolk CMAV 5/31/2010 6/18/2010 Begun

LSD 47 San Diego EDPMA 7/21/2010 6/15/2011 Begun

DDG 51 Norfolk EDSRA 8/4/2010 1/28/2011 Begun

DDG 105 San Diego PSA 9/8/2010 12/13/2010 Begun

CG 66 Mayport DSRA 9/29/2010 2/23/2011 Begun

LPD 18 San Diego PMA 11/2/2010 1/9/2011 Begun

LFD 6 San Diego DPMA 11/3/2010 7/13/2011 Begun

FFG 54 Puget Sound SRA 11/15/2010 2/4/2011 Begun

DDG 67 Norfolk SRA 1/5/2011 4/5/2011 Begun

MCM 2 Japan DSRA 1/12/2011 4/13/2011 Begun

MCM 3 San Diego DSRA 1/12/2011 3/16/2011 Begun

CG 65 Pearl Harbor DSRA 1/19/2011 7/13/2011 Begun

MCM 13 Bahrain DSRA 1/31/2011 5/2/2011 Begun

DDG 81 Norfolk DSRA 2/9/2011 5/25/2011 Begun

DDG 65 San Diego EDSRA 2/16/2011 8/3/2011 A-7

FFG 38 San Diego DSRA 5/4/2011 8/5/2011 A-56

Full Test, 0 “gaps”Partial Test, significant “gaps”

Partial Test, minor “gaps”No Yield, major “gaps”

Last Updated: 28 Janurary 2011

132 February 2011

TSRA Purpose and Scope

Minimize late identification of work• Early identification of repair work• CSMP validation and verification• Improved BAWP and AWP

development

Consolidate Assessments • Level Loading & Better workload planning

Improved ICMP: Global Solution of issues• Life Cycle Management• Validate existing task• Identify gaps in necessary tasks

Improved validity of MFOM • Quality of CSMP

Increase Ships Self-Assessment• RMC Subject Matter Expert teamed

with S/F• On-the-job maintenance training• Identification of required parts

Reduce or avoid deployed casualties • Identify impending problems when ship is in port

Preparation prior to major events• Major Availabilities• Deployments• INSURV

2 February 2011 14

TSRA

2 February 2011 15

• TSRA I• Pre-availability baselining of systems material condition

• TSRA II• Tanks, voids, structures, watertight doors, intakes etc..• Integrated testing to include ‘redline’ systems

• TSRA III• Pre-deployment assessment• C5RA• BMDRA

• TSRA IV• Prepare ship for major events ex. INSURV

Continuous Assessment during FRP

Ship Lifecycle Sustainment Program

Proposed Sustainment Program that supports and spans the Ships Expected Service Life (ESL):

2 February 2011 16

Sustainment is the group of activities that supports the Ship between availabilities.

• New Ship Delivery / Fleet Introduction• Trouble Systems Program / Material

Readiness Data Base • Material Assessment Program• Waterfront Technical Support

• Distance Support• ICAS, MRDB, ORTSTARS

• ISEA(s) Support• Logistics Support

• Tech Docs, Obsolescence• Training Support

Sustaining Platform

Wholeness

WorkupsSurge & DeploymentDepot

Mid Life

Commissioning De-Commissioning

“I” Level maintenance support

Comprehensive Surface ShipAssessment Program

(Find, Fix, Train/TSRA, etc.)

Fleet Intro INACT

SURFMEPP

• 70 Baseline Availability Work Packages (BAWPs) in FY11• Technical Foundation Papers (TFPs) (LCS and LPD-17)• Ship Sheets for all Surface Ships• Class Maintenance Plan Strengthening

• Corrosion Control Leadership• ABS Management - 16 ships scheduled for FY11 survey --

Providing direct oversight of for all FY11 dry-dock surveys

SURFMEPP – TYCOM BAWP / AWP / TFP Management

• Additional ship classes receive BAWPs, AWPs and TFPs every year

• All ship classes will have BAWPs, AWPs and TFPs by FY14

• Production schedule is dependent upon resources in place at SURFMEPP

SURFMEPP Stood-Up: 08 NOV 2010• SURFMEPP shore-based command establishment at Under Secretary of the Navy for approval• Additional FY10 EOY funds received from CPF and USFF to support further acceleration of core products

CLASS FY-10 FY-11 FY-12

DDG 28 55 87

CG 8 16

LSD 5 9

LHD 2 4

LHA 0

LPD 3

LCC 1

MCM 5

PC 4

FFG 3

LCS 2

Total 28 70 134

172 February 2011

Availability Execution

• There is not a functioning “availability completion”/“work certification” process for surface ships

Problem

• Develop processes for: • Technical Adjudication of Growth/New Work• Work Certification• Non-accomplishment of “MANDATORY” CMP tasks must be

approved by NAVSEA 05. • Made ‘Items of Priority’ for next availability

• Integrated Test Plan Management• Event Readiness• Availability Close-out

Approach

2 February 2011 18

Availability Execution

• Technical Adjudication of Growth/New Work• Ensure proper rigor is applied to growth/new work identified during

technically mandated assessments or repairs • Event Readiness

• Standard pre-requisite templates/timelines for Propulsion & C5I PCD event

• Integrated Test Plan Management• Utilize to integrate all maintenance activity and ship’s force testing• Support availability certification

• Work Certification• Ensure all availability work is planned, executed and tested technically

correct• Formal certification of readiness for FC/ST and availability completion

• Availability Close-out • Improve tracking and close-out of all availability completion issues• ILS deliverables, SOVT testing

5 Focus Areas for Improvement

2 February 2011 19

Focus on Leveraging Current Best Practices

Summary

202 February 2011

• We enjoy the continued support from HHQ to be successful

• Alignment of reporting responsibilities of 5+1 RMC Commanders to CNRMC

• We have identified the right people to fill the right billets

• Establish a single Cultural of Readiness

• Reliable Contract Governance is a key to efficient work package development

• In place are mechanisms to address the Five Big Rocks (Gaps in End to End Process)

CNRMC is committed as a strong partner with Industry

Questions?

RDML (Sel) Dave Gale9170 Second St., Suite 245

Norfolk, VA. 23511-2393(757) 444-3001

212 February 2011