24
Collection Management in Two Vermont Academics May 25, 2010 Vermont Library Conference Laura Crain [email protected] Associate Director for Collection Services Saint Michael’s College Ben Johnson [email protected] Faculty Librarian Vermont Technical College Reality is what you make it

Collection Management in Two Vermont Academics May 25, 2010 Vermont Library Conference Laura Crain [email protected] Associate Director for Collection Services

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Collection Management in Two Vermont Academics

May 25, 2010Vermont Library Conference

Laura [email protected]

Associate Director for Collection ServicesSaint Michael’s College

Ben [email protected]

Faculty LibrarianVermont Technical College

Reality is what you make it

Math may be the language of the Devil,

but statistics prove that reality really is what you make it.

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Sou

thern

VT

Ch

am

pla

in N

orw

ich

Gre

en

Mou

nta

in

St. Jo

sep

h

NE C

ulin

ary

God

dard

Sain

t Mic

hael’s

Un

iv o

f V

erm

on

t

Lyn

don

Sta

te

Castle

ton

Sain

t M

ich

ael’s

Joh

nson

Ste

rling

Ben

nin

gto

n

Mid

dle

bu

ry

Verm

on

t Law

Circulation per Student at Vermont Colleges

National Center for Education Statistics http://nces.edu.gov (retrieved 3/18/2010)

How Does Usage Drive Content Decisions?

• Book purchasing based on Circulation stats

• Collection analysis

• Retain subscriptions based on cost-per-article

• Anticipate “expected use”

The Pittsburgh Study of Library Use

Acquisitions of books:

40% did not circulate in 7 years.

When a book does not circulate within the first 6 years of ownership,

it has less than 1 chance in 50 of ever being borrowed.

--Kent, A. 1978

At Saint Michael’s

the percentage of books that have never circulated:

41%

Books acquired in 2004 includes gifts and purchases

Saint Michael’s purchased monographs

Percentage of books that have never circulated:

29%

acquired in 2004

The Subjects with the Most “0 Circs”

Acquired in 2004 Pub date 2000-2005

The Subjects with the Least “0” Circs

Acquired 2004 Pub date 2000-2005

So?

• Revise gift book criteria.

• Subject allocations: circulation!

• For low circ subjects:eliminate “just in case” implement “on-demand” purchasing

• Weed on!

Monograph allocations in subject areas:

based on circulation & book price

Book prices from ybp.com: univ. & trade press averages

Collection Analysis of Circulating Monographs

• Shows high and low use areas

• Targeted collection development

• Are subject holdings adequate to meet user needs?

Project modeled after University of Colorado – Boulder:http://www.cal-webs.org/handouts04/CollectionAnalysis.ppt

Greatest Number of Circulation Transactions

Per item by Subject

Circulating books – 2 year period

Least number of transactions per item by subject

Areas with holdings above 500 itemsCirculations for a two year period: FY08 & FY09

Scenario 1

– holdings are old / not relevant: weed / update

– refer to interlibrary loan borrowing

Scenario 2

– Subject is more “journals intensive”– not a research-intensive subject

Interpretation of a low use area

Do current books circulate more?

New books: .50 circulations per title

Compared to .11 times a year for all books

FY09newly acquired

current copyright (2008 &2009)Durick Library

A transformation…

“from a one-time ad hoc project to a sustainable, on-going process

of evidence-based review.”

Emily Stambaugh (2005)

Cost per use

Using Data to Fill the Gaps

EBSCOhost title usage report

abstract “requests”

EBSCOhost title usage report – Philosopher’s Index

Top EBSCOabstract requests

I'm no fan of reality...

References

Canepi, K. (2007). Fund allocation formula analysis: determining elements for best practices in libraries. Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services 31, no. 1.

Franklin, B. (2005). Managing the electronic collection with cost per use data. IFLA Journal 31, no.3.

Kaay, A. & Zimmerman, P. (2008). The Development and application of a unique percentage-based allocations formula at the University of Windsor. Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services 32.

Kent, A., et al. (1978). A Cost-Benefit Model of Some Critical Library Operations in Terms of Use of Materials, Final Report, Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh.

Knieval, Jennifer, Heather Wicht and Lynn Silipigni Conway. (2004). Collection Analysis with Circulation Data: what Usage Can Tell Us about Weeding and Collection Development. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado. <http://www.cal-webs.org/handouts04/CollectionAnalysis.ppt>.

Ochola, J.N. (2002). Use of circulation statistics and interlibrary loan data in collection management.

Collection Management 27, no. 1.

Payne, John. Director of Library and Information Services. Colchester, VT: Saint Michael’s College. Provided advice and expertise on formulas and data samples.

Stambaugh, E. (2005). Analytical skills for collection development and journal management. Against the Grain, Nov. 2005.

Collection Management in Two Vermont Academics

May 25, 2010Vermont Library Conference

Laura [email protected]

Associate Director for Collection ServicesSaint Michael’s College

http://www.smcvt.edu/library/about/staff/profiles/crain.asp

Ben [email protected]

Faculty LibrarianVermont Technical College

Reality is what you make it