11
Collecting Information via the Web Stephen Porter Director of Institutional Research [email protected] Michael Roy Director of Academic Computing Services [email protected] Wesleyan University

Collecting Information via the Web Stephen Porter Director of Institutional Research [email protected] Michael Roy Director of Academic Computing Services

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Collecting Information via the Web Stephen Porter Director of Institutional Research sporter@wesleyan.edu Michael Roy Director of Academic Computing Services

Collecting Information via the Web

Stephen PorterDirector of Institutional Research

[email protected]

Michael RoyDirector of Academic Computing Services

[email protected]

Wesleyan University

Page 2: Collecting Information via the Web Stephen Porter Director of Institutional Research sporter@wesleyan.edu Michael Roy Director of Academic Computing Services

Advantages of web surveys

Low costs - only software, no printing, envelopes or postage needed.

No data entry costs. Minimal data entry errors. Easy to correct problems during survey

administration. Much quicker completion time for project. Response rates are comparable.

Page 3: Collecting Information via the Web Stephen Porter Director of Institutional Research sporter@wesleyan.edu Michael Roy Director of Academic Computing Services

Population It’s important to keep in mind your survey

population. Do you have good email addresses for sample? Does everyone use email software that allows

hyperlinking? Do some people not use email at all?

Students (especially grad) may not use institution assigned emails. Do you collect home email addresses?

Some low-tech faculty don’t use email or check infrequently.

Page 4: Collecting Information via the Web Stephen Porter Director of Institutional Research sporter@wesleyan.edu Michael Roy Director of Academic Computing Services

Security and web surveys

Security can be a big issue – you have two choices:

Ask for name and other identifying information such as userid and password. Multiple responses can be eliminated. Responses can be linked to institutional data. No evidence this affects response rates, but be

aware many people are nervous using SSN’s on the web.

Important to state that only aggregate data will be released.

Page 5: Collecting Information via the Web Stephen Porter Director of Institutional Research sporter@wesleyan.edu Michael Roy Director of Academic Computing Services

Security and web surveys

Allow anonymous responses. In theory, anyone can answer the survey. Multiple responses will vary with topic and

survey length. Cannot use incentives. Research indicates that promises of

anonymity and/or confidentiality do not affect response rates except for sensitive topics such as sexual behavior.

Page 6: Collecting Information via the Web Stephen Porter Director of Institutional Research sporter@wesleyan.edu Michael Roy Director of Academic Computing Services

Security and web surveys

Sending out id numbers and passwords can be cumbersome.

It’s possible to embed an id number and password in a unique hyperlink that is emailed to each survey participant.

This approach has worked well for us, but make sure participants know that the survey is not anonymous.

Page 7: Collecting Information via the Web Stephen Porter Director of Institutional Research sporter@wesleyan.edu Michael Roy Director of Academic Computing Services

Survey structure

Keep it simple: avoid complicated designs with lots of colors.

Make the survey one (screen) page in length. For drop down boxes, make sure first response

category is not the visible line of the box. Keep the survey as short as possible. See Dillman (2000) pp. 352-401 for a good set

of detailed recommendations.

Page 8: Collecting Information via the Web Stephen Porter Director of Institutional Research sporter@wesleyan.edu Michael Roy Director of Academic Computing Services

Survey administration

The Dillman (2000) “tailored design” approach Pre-notice, survey, reminder, follow-up survey,

and so on. For web surveys it is simply multiple emails. Considered the best method possible for

surveying - used for example by the Census Bureau.

If you do only one survey mailing, you WILL get a low response rate.

With multiple emails you need to take out respondents from your email list.

Page 9: Collecting Information via the Web Stephen Porter Director of Institutional Research sporter@wesleyan.edu Michael Roy Director of Academic Computing Services

Survey administration

Response Rate for 2002 Senior Survey (Web Version)

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

4/8/02

4/9/02

4/10/02

4/11/02

4/12/02

4/13/02

4/14/02

4/15/02

4/16/02

4/17/02

4/18/02

4/19/02

4/20/02

4/21/02

4/22/02

4/23/02

4/24/02

4/25/02

4/26/02

4/27/02

4/28/02

4/29/02

4/30/02

5/1/02

5/2/02

5/3/02

5/4/02

5/5/02

5/6/02

Cu

mu

lati

ve r

esp

onse

rat

e as

of

mid

nig

ht

Initialemail

First reminderemail

Second reminderemail

Third reminderemail

Page 10: Collecting Information via the Web Stephen Porter Director of Institutional Research sporter@wesleyan.edu Michael Roy Director of Academic Computing Services

Survey administration

The email should be concise, with hyperlink to survey visible when participant opens the email.

Avoid sending emails on Monday. We usually wait a week between reminder

emails. How many? 2 or 3 reminders are fine,

especially if you allow participant to opt out. Offering a web option via “snail mail” does not

seem to work.

Page 11: Collecting Information via the Web Stephen Porter Director of Institutional Research sporter@wesleyan.edu Michael Roy Director of Academic Computing Services

For more information

Dillman, Don A. (2000) Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

National Computer Systems, Inc. (NCS) has a great website with a sample size calculator, survey research glossary and a set of short reports on various survey research topics:

http://www.ncs.com/research-notes/ Talk with your institutional research or

assessment office – no need to reinvent the wheel.