18
Collaborative Approach to Policy and Practice Improvement Background Knowledgeable team Peer Institution Policies as a Starting Point Policy Implementation Challenge Internal Audit Quality Control Deconstruction of the Policies and Foci

Collaborative Approach to Policy and Practice Improvement Background – Knowledgeable team – Peer Institution Policies as a Starting Point – Policy Implementation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Collaborative Approach to Policy and Practice Improvement Background – Knowledgeable team – Peer Institution Policies as a Starting Point – Policy Implementation

Collaborative Approach to Policy and PracticeImprovement

Background

– Knowledgeable team– Peer Institution Policies as a Starting Point– Policy Implementation Challenge– Internal Audit Quality Control– Deconstruction of the Policies and Foci

Page 2: Collaborative Approach to Policy and Practice Improvement Background – Knowledgeable team – Peer Institution Policies as a Starting Point – Policy Implementation

Procedures and Requirements (Policies)

• Costing – Expenditures • Cost Transfer• Cost Sharing• Cost Overruns• Project Modification• Subawards• Record Retention

Page 3: Collaborative Approach to Policy and Practice Improvement Background – Knowledgeable team – Peer Institution Policies as a Starting Point – Policy Implementation

The Template

Purpose Introduction Definitions Criteria Examples Documentation Responsibilities Sources Appendix/Exhibits

Page 4: Collaborative Approach to Policy and Practice Improvement Background – Knowledgeable team – Peer Institution Policies as a Starting Point – Policy Implementation

Expenditures

Criteria– Reasonable– Allowable– Allocable– Consistently Treated– Supported by Documentation

UnallowableCosts Requiring Prior Approval

Appendix I: Direct Costing PracticesAppendix II: Treatment of Costs as Direct or IndirectAppendix III: MSU Indirect Cost Expense CodesAppendix IV: F&A Costs Charged DirectlyAppendix V: Unallowable Costs and Exceptions

Page 5: Collaborative Approach to Policy and Practice Improvement Background – Knowledgeable team – Peer Institution Policies as a Starting Point – Policy Implementation

Cost Transfer

• Transfer of costs should be minimized and should be a rare exception. Payroll cost transfers performed after the certification of effort that cause the payroll distribution to not align with the certified effort distribution are highly discouraged and require significant documentation, approval, and recertification of effort.

• Cost transfers must be carried out in a timely manner. Project expense detail should be reviewed on a monthly basis and cost transfer should be as soon as the error is identified. Cost transfers being made in excess of 90 days will be carefully scrutinized.

Page 6: Collaborative Approach to Policy and Practice Improvement Background – Knowledgeable team – Peer Institution Policies as a Starting Point – Policy Implementation

Cost Transfer GuidanceType of Error ExplanationData entry/Clerical error Explain how the input error occurred and action being taken to reduce the

likelihood of error in the future. An explanation of the relationship and allocability of the expense to the project may be required.

Preaward costs charged to an institutional account.

Explain the relationship and allocability of the expense to the project. Ensure that the expenses being transferred are within the allowable charging period for the project.

Wrong fund/project Explain the situation which led to the expenses being charge to the project, the actions taken to reduce the likelihood of the error in the future, and provide an explanation of the relationship and allocability of the expenses to the project.

Payroll adjustment Explain why the payroll transaction should be adjusted and the effective date for the adjustment. 1. If the adjustment is the result of a change in effort distribution,

common with new project startup, the adjustment should include documentation that the adjustment is consistent with an updated/revised personnel action form.

2. If the adjustment results from the revision to an effort reporting form at the time of certification, explain the change in effort commitment(s) that resulted in the revision to the effort certification form and include a copy of the certified effort form with the adjustment request.

3. If the adjustment requires revision to a previously certified effort reporting period contact Sponsored Programs to discuss the adjustment. Only in rare instances will an adjustment transferring expenses to a sponsored project be allowed post certification of effort. In such an instance the adjustment will also require the revision of the effort certification.

Page 7: Collaborative Approach to Policy and Practice Improvement Background – Knowledgeable team – Peer Institution Policies as a Starting Point – Policy Implementation

Cost Sharing

II. Introduction

The University should make cost sharing commitments only when required by the sponsor or by the competitive nature of the program. A program announcement or application may include a requirement to cost share or the sponsor may insist during the negotiation of an agreement on a specific contribution to the project as a condition of the award. There may also be situations as described above where the University has determined that a cost sharing contribution is necessary to ensure the success of a competitive proposal. Cost sharing should be limited only to those situations where it is mandated by a sponsor or the University has determined that such a contribution is necessary to ensure the success of a competitive award or proposal.

Page 8: Collaborative Approach to Policy and Practice Improvement Background – Knowledgeable team – Peer Institution Policies as a Starting Point – Policy Implementation

Cost Share

• Types of cost share– Mandatory– Voluntary Committed– Voluntary Uncommitted

• Sources of cost share– University funds– Effort– Waived F&A– Another university sponsored account– Third party

Page 9: Collaborative Approach to Policy and Practice Improvement Background – Knowledgeable team – Peer Institution Policies as a Starting Point – Policy Implementation

Cost Share

Cost Share CriteriaAcceptable Expenditures

– Faculty, staff, or student salaries and applicable fringe benefits;– Laboratory supplies;– Travel (U.S. air carriers only);– Overhead (F&A Costs) on all allowable cost shared expenditures;– Unrecovered F&A, if approved by sponsor.

Unacceptable Expenditures– Expenditures normally treated as indirect, such as administrative

salaries and office supplies;– Unallowable costs under 2 CFR 200, such as alcoholic beverages,

entertainment;– Memberships in community organizations; and – Travel on foreign air carriers.

Page 10: Collaborative Approach to Policy and Practice Improvement Background – Knowledgeable team – Peer Institution Policies as a Starting Point – Policy Implementation

Cost Overruns

It is the responsibility of the University through the Principal Investigator and responsible persons to ensure that adequate funds are available for expenditure transactions, including payroll disbursements. In particular, Principal Investigators and those responsible for assisting in financial oversight over sponsored projects are expected to monitor monthly expenditures on each individual project so that whenever possible, cost overruns are avoided.

This guidance is intended to:– Help units understand types of cost overruns or overdrafts;– Ensure that any cost overruns are resolved in a timely manner;– Establish procedures for timely identification and processing of cost

overruns

Page 11: Collaborative Approach to Policy and Practice Improvement Background – Knowledgeable team – Peer Institution Policies as a Starting Point – Policy Implementation

Cost Overruns Roles & ResponsibilitiesPrincipal Investigators should:• Monitor expenditures and revenues for each project within appropriate line items and limits;• Communicate with the fiscal administrator/budget officer to avoid costs overruns;• Respond to requests from the appropriate Dean and Division of Research & Economic Development in a timely

manner Budget Officers with each School/College and/or Department should:• Review the charges on projects to ensure appropriate expenditures and revenues;• Work with PI to appropriately document and process cost overruns;• Serve as an approver for all cost overruns• For year-end closing, review the list from RFA, confirm that sponsored funds are anticipated, and where

additional sponsored funds are not anticipated, to provide an alternate source of funds to cover the overdraft. Restricted Funds Accounting (RFA) and Sponsored Programs should:• Ensure that adequate funds are available for expenditure transactions, including payroll transactions;• For year-end closing, send a list of all sponsored project cost overruns to each department/unit to insure that

the Department Chair/administrative staff is aware of the potential liability Division of Research & Economic Development should:• Review any deficit balance exceeding $15,000• Require the PI or designee confirm the temporary nature of the overdraft, and to explain how it will be covered

without adversely affecting the project

Page 12: Collaborative Approach to Policy and Practice Improvement Background – Knowledgeable team – Peer Institution Policies as a Starting Point – Policy Implementation

Project Modification and Prior Approvals

Project modifications on Federal, non-construction awards which require prior approval under to 2 CFR 200.308 include:

1. Change in the scope or the objective of the project or program (even if there is no associated budget revision requiring prior written approval).

2. Change in a key person specified in the application or the Federal award.3. The disengagement from the project for more than three months, or a 25 percent

reduction in time devoted to the project, by the approved project director or principal investigator.

4. The inclusion, unless waived by the Federal awarding agency, of costs that require prior approval under 2 CFR 200.

5. The transfer of funds budgeted for participant support costs as defined in §200.75 Participant support costs to other categories of expense.

6. Unless described in the application and funded in the approved Federal awards, the subawarding, transferring or contracting out of any work under a Federal award. This provision does not apply to the acquisition of supplies, material, equipment or general support services.

7. Changes in the amount of approved cost-sharing or matching provided by the non-Federal entity.

Page 13: Collaborative Approach to Policy and Practice Improvement Background – Knowledgeable team – Peer Institution Policies as a Starting Point – Policy Implementation

Budget Revisions Not Requiring Sponsor ApprovalAs a proposal budget is a projection of project needs and costs that will in many instances not be incurred for normally six plus months into the future, it is not uncommon that budget revisions may be required. In addition as a project progresses a revision may be required due to needs that were not anticipated at the time of the proposal submission. In many, if not most instances this modification can be made without sponsor approval. Principal Investigator or Program Director:

The PI/PD will submit all requests for budget revisions and justification, in writing, to the Office of Sponsored Programs & Research and the Office of Restricted Funds Accounting. Budget request should include the amount and expense categories to be moved to and from. Budget request should include:– The amount– Expense categories to be moved to and from– Justification documents

The request has to be consistent with the agency guidelines and the terms and conditions of the award. Appendix B, provide a sample rebudgeting request.

Office of Sponsored Programs & ResearchThe budget request is reviewed for appropriateness and accuracy by OSPR and is either approved or denied. If required, OSPR will contact the PI for additional information regarding the request or will provide an explanation for the declination of the request.

Office of Restricted Funds AccountingORFA notifies the PI/PD when the adjustments are made to the account in BANNER

Page 14: Collaborative Approach to Policy and Practice Improvement Background – Knowledgeable team – Peer Institution Policies as a Starting Point – Policy Implementation

Appendix A – Costs Require Prior Approval on Federal Awards

• Subawards (200.308).• Issuance of fixed price subawards (200.332).• Advertising and public relation costs (200.421)• Costs associated with advisory councils (200.422) • Charges of a faculty member’s salary to a Federal award exceeding the proportionate share of the IBS

(200.430).• Incidental activity pay (200.430). • Entertainment costs (200.438)• All equipment purchases (general or specialized) require prior approval (200.439) • Cost increases for fluctuations in exchange rates (200.440).• Fund raising costs for the purposes of meeting the Federal program objectives are allowable with

prior written approval from the Federal awarding agency (200.442).• Costs of membership in any civic or community organization (200.454).• Participant support are allowable with the prior approval (200.456)• Costs of selling and marketing (unless allowed under § 200.421 Advertising and public relations.) are

unallowable, except as direct costs, with prior approval by the Federal awarding agency when necessary for the performance of the Federal award (200.467).

• Student activity costs (200.469)• Travel costs for dependents are unallowable, except for travel of duration of six months or more with

prior approval of the Federal awarding agency (200.474).• Travel costs of officials are allowable with the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency

or pass-through entity when they are specifically related to the Federal award (200.474)

Page 15: Collaborative Approach to Policy and Practice Improvement Background – Knowledgeable team – Peer Institution Policies as a Starting Point – Policy Implementation

Subawards

• Subaward Policy• Subaward Request Form• Subrecipient Self-Assessment/Disclosure• Subrecipient Risk Assessment

Page 16: Collaborative Approach to Policy and Practice Improvement Background – Knowledgeable team – Peer Institution Policies as a Starting Point – Policy Implementation

Record RetentionGrants, Contracts and Supporting Documents

Type of Record Location Retention PeriodUnfunded Applications or Proposals. Sponsored Programs and

Research and PISix months following submission of the application or proposals. Records will be returned to the PI for retention or disposal.

Awarded Applications, Proposals, and Supporting Documents

Sponsored Programs andResearch

3 years and 90 days after the conclusion of the award*

Awards Sponsored Programs andResearch

3 years, after submission of fiscal status report or after final payment under a Federal contract*

Records Regarding HumanSubjects

Sponsored Programs and Research-IRB Compliance Office

3 years

State and City Awards Sponsored Programs & Research and Office of Restricted Funds Accounting (ORFA)

Follow terms and conditions because some of these type awards require that the University retain fiscal records for 6 years. Otherwise keep for 3 years after final payment.

Program Reports and Scientific Data PI, OSPR and ORFA 3 years and 90 days after the conclusion of the award*

*If litigation, claim, or audit is initiated prior to the expiration of the 3-year period, the records must be retained until all findings involving the records have been resolved and final action taken.

Page 17: Collaborative Approach to Policy and Practice Improvement Background – Knowledgeable team – Peer Institution Policies as a Starting Point – Policy Implementation

Record Retention – Roles & ResponsibilitiesPrinciple Investigators

The PI or PD maintains any and all documents pertinent to the research or training program. These include but are not limited to all raw data, analytical processes and results, performance measurement data, methods, lab notebooks, technical reports, publications, etc.

Office of Sponsored Programs & ResearchThe Office of Sponsored Programs & Research maintains any and all documents related to that Office's areas of responsibility including records of compliance, proposals, budgets, guidelines, prior approval documentation, cost share commitments, etc. relevant to specific sponsored projects.

Restricted Funds AccountingRestricted Funds Accounting maintains any and all documents relevant to that Offices' responsibilities, which includes all fiscal documents, including miscellaneous financial information, such as cost share commitments and accumulation of those commitments and the organization’s F&A Rate proposal. RFA records should provide for the identification, in its accounts, of all awards received and expended and the sponsor or Federal programs under which they were received. Federal award identification data must include, as applicable, the CFDA title and number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program, including records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally-funded activities; these records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income and interest and be supported by source documentation.

Human ResourcesHuman Resources maintain any and all documents related to HR's area of responsibilities, which includes personnel records, compensation, promotions, payroll records for all persons whether funded or cost shared that are working on sponsored projects.

Comptroller’s OfficeComptroller's Office maintains any and all documents related to this area of responsibility.

Page 18: Collaborative Approach to Policy and Practice Improvement Background – Knowledgeable team – Peer Institution Policies as a Starting Point – Policy Implementation

Questions