97
Whitman School of Management Advanced Building Systems Weston Halkyard / Tanner Halkyard / David Haberman / Rhett Bruno ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN PROJECT OVERVIEW FACADE + ROOFING ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS PLUMBING SYSTEMS BUILDING AND SITE MECHAN ICAL SYSTEMS STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS

Collaborative Analysis

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Analytical Design as well as Enhancement Intervention for the Michael J. Whitman School of Management, Syracuse University

Citation preview

Page 1: Collaborative Analysis

Whitman School of Management

Advanced Building Systems

Weston Halkyard / Tanner Halkyard / David Haberman / Rhett Bruno

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

S

Page 2: Collaborative Analysis

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoTable of Contents

Project Overview

Building and Site

Structural Systems

Architectural Design

Program Circulation

Atrium Classrooms O�ce/ Meeting Rooms Spine

Location Context

Tra�c Wind

4-56-7

89

10-1112

1415-17

1819

Framing Structure Atrium Structure

Metal Panel Facade Brick Facade

28-3031-35

3637

Plumbing Systems

Electrical Systems

Sewage Conditions/ DrainageFire Suppression

5253

General Overview2

Lighting/ Classrooms55 Lighting/ O�ce Block56 Lighting/ Spine57

Facade and Roo�ng Systems

Matrix

Interventions

Atrium Roo�ng62 Facades on Plans59-60

Materiality63-64 Occupancy Control65

Matrix66-67

Thermal Massing Wall and Louvres & Adjustable O�ce Windows

68-73

Green Roof Atrium74-81 Natural Ventilation Break82-96

Temperature20 Sunlight21-25 Louvres26

Glass Facade38

Mechanical Systems

HVAC in Atrium HVAC in Classroom Block

HVAC in O�ce Block HVAC in Spine

40-4142-4445-4748-50

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

S

Page 3: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

S

PROJECT OVERVIEW

Page 4: Collaborative Analysis

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoGeneral Overview

SIZE: 165,000 square ft

PROGRAM: Classrooms, Auditoria, Space for team meetings and collaborative activityExecutive Learning Space, Bathrooms, Lounge

PRIMARY DESIGN ELEMENT: Central communication circulation corridor with a grand stair maximizes program connectivity and daylight penetration of all the interior spaces. It integrates sustainable systems including a sophisticated building management system, under-floor air distribution, and radiant heating and cooling.

PROGRAM TYPE: College/ University

CAPACITY: 1,270 people

BUILDING COST: $30,000,000

COST PSF: $187

GENERAL OVERVIEW:

: FXFOWLE ArchitectsDESIGNER

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

S

Page 5: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

S

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

Page 6: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

SMARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoProgram

Classrooms

O�ces

Bathrooms

Vertical Circulation

Communal Space

PROGRAMMATIC CONCEPT:

Each of the primary curriculum programs Undergraduate, Graduate and Executive occupies its own �oor in the building. This includes administrative o�ces, student activity and breakout rooms, and classrooms. Common functions, such as the cafeteria and special teaching spaces, are interspersed on these �oors to assure a degree of interaction between students of di�erent programs. The faculty o�ces and support facilities clustered in the taller, masonry volume on the top two �oors, provide calmness away from major activity and ensures camaraderie and communication between academic departments, while remaining accessible to students. The concourse and �rst �oor levels provide spaces for reception andother common uses as well as classrooms shared with the University as a whole.

The building includes: - 22 classrooms - 200-seat auditorium - 20 team meeting rooms / undergraduate and graduate computer clusters - 11 centers and institutes - 12 student clubs and organizations - Career Center - The Lubin Visitor’s Center

Page 7: Collaborative Analysis

Classrooms

O�ces

Bathrooms

Atrium

Horizontal circulation

Vertical Circulation

Mechanical

Auditorium

Cafe

Milton Hall

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

SMARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoProgram

Page 8: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

SMARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoCirculation

O�ce/ Meeting RoomsClassrooms

Elevator Core

Vertical Circulation

Horizontal Circulation

Atrium

Circulation

Page 9: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

SMARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoCirculation

- The Spine Draws in pedestrians from each of the surrounding streets and then acts as an interior street on which Whiman’s new ‘Urban Fabric’ islocated. It is in the spine that all major circulation takes places, connectingthe many programs.

Marshall St.

East Adams St.

Uni

vers

ity A

ve.

‘Spi

ne’

Wal

nut P

l.

Page 10: Collaborative Analysis

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENTMARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoAtrium

ATRIUM/ COMMUNITY LEVEL SPACE

The Atrium is designed to extrude from the urban fabric and and engage both the path of the campus and the street. Aglow with natural light and adorned with interior trees, the atrium pro-vides an ideal lounge/study/special event area with a strong sense of place. At night, the atrium’s transparency opens the building to the exterior, o�ering dramatic views of the campus and down-town.

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

S

Atrium

Page 11: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

SMARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoClassrooms

The �nishes of the classrooms balance a digni�ed corporate ambience and a free-spirited student learning environment. They are set within a case of metal and glass, more public then the o�ce block, but less then the atrium. The glass allows di�use light into the space, ensuring a suitable teaching space, as well as dimmable arti�cial lighting.

ClASSROOM BLOCKS

Page 12: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

SMARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoO�ce/Meeting Rooms

Expressing the essence of the building’s function, the class-rooms are clustered in a volume as a “machine for teaching.” Encased in brick, this is the most private of the block within Whitman’s urban fabric. Where on the �rst �oor it counters the very public atrium by privatizing entirely, on the second a cafe interacts with the the same space. Up until the Atrium roof the �oors are mixed between public meeting rooms and private o�ces, distin-guishing between them by either clear or glazed glass.

OFFICE/ MEETING ROOM BLOCKS

Page 13: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

SMARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoO�ce/Meeting Rooms

MECHANICAL SYSTEM PLACEMENT: PUBLIC vs. PRIVATE

- With mechanical and service systems located in the basement and the penthouse, public and private spaces �lter in between. Sandwiched between the �rst and sixth �oor which are completely private, are a mix of spaces where privacy prevails as height reaches above the atrium. where privacy prevails as height reaches above the atrium.

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

S

MECHANICAL SYSTEM PLACEMENT: PUBLIC vs. PRIVATE

- With mechanical and service systems located in the basement and the penthouse, public and private spaces �lter in between. Sandwiched between the �rst and sixth �oor which are completely private, are a mix of spaces where privacy prevails as height reaches above the atrium. where privacy prevails as height reaches above the atrium.

Private Offices

Public Meeting Rooms

Mechanical/Service

Page 14: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

SMARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett Bruno‘Spine’

The circulation spine uni�es the composition of Whitman, bring-ing clarity and orientation to the occupants and, through its diapha-nous façade, animating the building both day and night. Sliding out from the other volumes light is able to di�use through the glass and connect each space. With its shiny metallic ceiling and sparkling terrazzo �oor it is meant to remain as bright as possible.

CIRCULATION SPINE

Page 15: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

S

BUILDING AND SITE

Page 16: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

S

GEOGRAPHIC LOCATIOIN

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoSite Conditions | Location

Page 17: Collaborative Analysis

Low scalestructures

Parking

SheratonN

Green Connection

Drag direction of green across the block

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoSite Conditions | Context

The green space that is Walnut park just across the block is the perfect place to draw from in terms of connecting the environment to the Whitman site which is otherwise made up of streetsides and pavement. The site takes the vegetation from the parkand incorporates them not only in the direct vicinity of Whitman, but also pulls them directly into the interior courtyard space.

The exterior uses natural grass in areas where mapleand birch trees are planted, however also incorporatesa special type of grass to elaborate on the greenery.Bahia grass occupies the south west side of the building near the the corner and the Sheraton. Thistype of grass can withstand high heat temperaturesas occur in the summer and low temperatures that occur during the winter.

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

S

Page 18: Collaborative Analysis

Low scalestructures

Parking

Sheraton

Hall of Languages

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoSite Conditions | Context

N Whitman School of Management is located on the center axis of the urban grid for the Marshall street areaof the University, It occupies the righthand corner of thecampus’ “gateway” and draws one through with a finaleview of the Hall of Languages directly up university ave.the angle of the fenestrated lounge area of Whitman opensup the building to the occupancy of the street as well asthe view towards the entrance as you move up towards theSheraton.

Whitman is placed on one of the most important lots withinthe urban layout and occupies the corner of University ave(a primary vehicle occupancy street) and Marshall St ( a primarily pedestrian occupied street.)

Gateway Directinality

Gateway

Center Grid Line

Center axis cross points

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

S

Page 19: Collaborative Analysis

Low scalestructures

Parking

Sheraton

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoSite Conditions | Context

The Glass atrium area of Whitman faces the sun as well as the university. the view towards the Hall ofLanguages is unobstructed from the corner ofthe lounge. The glass provides not only a window like view but is classified as an outdoor spaces, so the sheer size of the “wall” allows for a completescenic view.

N

View towards the University

Service

Site

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

S

Page 20: Collaborative Analysis

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoSite Conditions | Tra�c

Paving Connection showing how the Design of Whitman connectswith the paving directioinality of the directly surrounding area.

Marshall St.

East Adams St.

Uni

vers

ity A

ve.

Wal

nut P

l.

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

S

Page 21: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

SMARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

9/15/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoSite ConditionsSite ConditionsSite ConditionsSite Conditions | Wind

January Febuary March

AprilMay June

July August Sepember

October November December

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

5 mph

10 mph

15 mph

20 mph

25 mph

30 mph

Average Wind Speed- Syracuse

MaximumAverage

Page 22: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

SMARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoSite Conditions I Temperature

22 degrees = winter ave.82 degrees = summer ave.

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

10°

20°

30°

40°

50°

60°61°

82°

70°

80°

90°

100°

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

69%

56%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Average Temperatures °F Average Relative Humidity %

Morning

Afternoon

High

Low

Page 23: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

SMARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoSite Conditions | Sunlight

Sheraton

N

South

Sunlight Exposure

Site

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Average Percentage of Sunshine

The green space that is Walnut park just across the block is the perfect place to draw from in terms of connecting the environment to the Whitman site which is otherwise made up of streetsides and pavement. The site takes the vegetation from the parkand incorporates them not only in the direct vicinity of Whitman, but also pulls them directly into the interior courtyard space.

The exterior uses natural grass in areas where mapleand birch trees are planted, however also incorporatesa special type of grass to elaborate on the greenery.Bahia grass occupies the south west side of the building near the the corner and the Sheraton. Thistype of grass can withstand high heat temperaturesas occur in the summer and low temperatures that occur during the winter.

Page 24: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

SMARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoSite Conditions | Sunlight

Page 25: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

S

Site Conditions | Sunlight

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett Bruno

The angled glass facade of the atriumallows for the maximum exposureto the sun on a daily occurance.

9 amNoon3 pm6 pmSunrise/SunsetDecember 21EquinoxesJune 21

N 10°20°30°40°50°60°70°80°

20:47

5:30

19:20

6:45

16:30

7:30

16:33

19:19

20:475:25

6:42

7:33

10°

20°

30°

40°

50°

60°70°

80°

9 amNoon3 pm6 pmSunrise/SunsetDecember 21EquinoxesJune 21

Page 26: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

SMARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett Bruno

SUNSET

SUNRISE

Noon Sun IntensitySunrise/ Sunset Intensity

Site Conditions | Sunlight

Page 27: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

SMARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett Bruno

- Lights �oods into either end of the protruding ‘spine’. The Atrium also�lters light into the buildings center where it di�uses into all of its spaces.

Site Conditions | Sunlight

Page 28: Collaborative Analysis

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

9/15/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoLouvres

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

S

Winter Sun

12:00 pm

Summer Sun

12:00 pm

12/5/11

Page 29: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

S

STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS

12/5/11

Page 30: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

SMARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoFraming Structure

Foundation and Footing Plan Plan of Structural Steel Frame

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

S

FOUNDATION AND STRUCTURAL PLANS

Page 31: Collaborative Analysis

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoFraming Structure

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

S SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Page 32: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

SMARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoFraming Structure

Section though Foundation

- For all the volumes but the Atrium Whitman has a simple Steel frame structuredespite its di�ering facades that helps unify the entire construct.

Section though Foundation

- For all the volumes but the Atrium Whitman has a simple Steel frame structuredespite its di�ering facades that helps unify the entire construct.

BUILDING STRUCTURE

Page 33: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

SMARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoAtrium Structure

The structure of the atrium was design for maximum light penetration. The many thin columns oriented along the interior of the glass allow for complete transparency for the campus. As the median between exterior and interior it is the most public space of the building and suggests community and interaction between the campus students and faculty.

ATRIUM STRUCTURE

Page 34: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

SMARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoAtrium Structure

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

S

Rotation and �exability of structure

The steel colums in the atrium are connected to the �oor through concrete and pin joint connections implying a unique structural design for the most celebrated part of the building

Page 35: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

SMARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoAtrium Structure

The overhead structure of the atrium is connected by pin joints enabling a sound support to an otherwise irregular shape

Page 36: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

SMARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoAtrium Structure

Aesthetic wood panelling masks the systems within the atrium

Page 37: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

SMARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoAtrium Structure

Aesthetic wood panelling is attached to concrete slab above with steel �ber cabeling

Page 38: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

SMARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoMetal Panel Facade

5/8” Exterior Sheathing

Aluminum Composite Wall Panel

Continuous Metal Angle

Access Flooring

Concrete Slab on Metal Deck

Metal Stud Bracing

Firestops and Smoke Seals

6” Metal Stud Framing

6” Foil Faced Batt Insulation

Wall Section

CLASSROOM BLOCK STRUCTURE

Page 39: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

SMARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoBrick Facade

OFFICE/ MEETING ROOM STRUCTURE

2 1/4” x 3 5/8” x 11 5/8” Face Brick

Solid Face Brick Below Horizontal Reveal

Aluminum Window Assembly

Sprayed-On Fireproo�ng at Beams (2 Hr. Rating)

Steel Beam

Galv. Stl, Ties w/ Seismic Clip and Cont. 9 GA. Wire

Adhered Flexible Threu-Wall/Sill Flashing

Plastic Fiber Mesh Cavity Filler “Mortar Net”

Adjustable Galv. Wire Tie at Beam @ 16” O.C.

5/8” Gypsum Board

2 ” Cavity Insulation

Vapor Retarder Applied to CMU Within Cavity

6” Concrete Masonry UnitWall Section

Page 40: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

SMARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoGlass Facade

CIRCULATION SPINE STRUCTURE

PTD. 2 Hr. Rated Shaft Wall Assemble

2 Hr. Fire Rated Metal Mullion W/ PTD. Finish

PTD. GWB Cove

Suspended Ceiling System Anchored to Slab Above

2 Hr. Fire Rated Glass Wall Assembly

5/8” Terrazzo Base Applied to 4” Concrete Block

Epoxy Terrazzo Finish Floor

Line of Reveals Beyond

Concrete Floor Slab

Concrete Floor Slab

Wall Section

Page 41: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

S

MECHANICAL SYSTEMS

Page 42: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

S

DISPLACEMENT VENTILATIONAIR CONDITIONING (UNDERFLOOR)

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoHVAC in Atrium

- A typical displacement ventilation system, such as one in an o�ce space, supplies conditioned cool air from an air handling unit (AHU) through a low induction di�user. The cool air spreads through the �oor of the space and then rises as the air warms due to heat exchange with heat sources in the space (occupants, computers, lights). - The warmer air has a lower density than the cool air, and thus creates upward convective �ows known as thermal plumes. The warm air then exits the zone at the ceiling height of the room.

Page 43: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

S

Voids cut in the roof allow heated air to exit naturally. The Atrium Space Can very nearly be considered an outdoor space.

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoHVAC in Atrium

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

S

Page 44: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

SMARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoHVAC in Classroom Block

- A typical displacement ventilation system, such as one in an o�ce space, supplies conditioned cool air from an air handling unit (AHU) through a low induction di�user. The cool air spreads through the �oor of the space and then rises as the air warms due to heat exchange with heat sources in the space (occupants, computers, lights).

Floor Vent

Ceiling Strip VentDISPLACEMENT VENTILATION AIR CONDITIONING (UNDER FLOOR)

Page 45: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

SMARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoHVAC in Classroom Block

Strip vent warm warm air exits

Floor vents fed by low induction di�user

- The warmer air has a lower density than the cool air, and thus creates upward convective �ows known as thermal plumes. The warm air then exits the zone at the ceiling height of the room.

DISPLACEMENT VENTILATION AIR CONDITIONING (UNDER FLOOR)

Page 46: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

SMARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoHVAC in Classroom Block

Indicated in blue a large stack vent runs up the outside edge of both class-room volumes. Mechanical rooms hugging this “tube” help feed this displace-ment ventilation system.

Page 47: Collaborative Analysis

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

SMARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoHVAC in O�ce Block

The O�ce Block uses a simple radiator system along the windows where a sophsticated building monitor system is located.

HVAC IN OFFICE BLOCK

Supply Di�userExterior Wall Radiator

Page 48: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

SMARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoHVAC in O�ce Block

Supply Di�users allows for a split in the air �ow emerging fromthe air duct into individual jets and guides them in the desired directions. This results in a rapid reduction in the velocity and temperature of the air entering the room, thus ensuring pleasant temperatures in the occupied zone.

Supply Di�user

Exterior Wall Radiator

Supply Diffuser Return/ Exhaust Register Convective RadiatorsSupply Diffuser Return/ Exhaust Register Convective Radiators

Page 49: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

SMARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

9/15/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoHVAC in O�ce Block

The entire System runs up the core where it is supplied by the mechanicalroom in the penthouse.

Detail of a duct when attached to the concrete slab.

Detail of a duct when attached to the steel frame structure.

Page 50: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

SMARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoHVAC in Spine

Radiator strip along glass wall

Strip vents hidden along edge of wall

On the fourth �oor where there is only a glass wall, a radiotor (As seen on right) runs along the hallway opposite the vents to ensure the space is kept warm.

Page 51: Collaborative Analysis

SUPPLY AND RETURN SYSTEM THROUGH THE BUILDING “SPINE”

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

SMARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoHVAC in Spine

Strip Vents run along the spine, with ducts breaking o� to feed the public bathrooms �anking the space. The system is served by the penthouse on the 7th �oor.

Strip vents

Page 52: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

SMARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoHVAC in Spine

Core rises up to the penhouse to feed the system. On the fourth �oor the radiator is shown where the wall becomes entirely glass along the corridor.

Mechanical Room in Penthouse

Hvac System moves through core

Radiator along glass

Strip Vent

Page 53: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

S

PLUMBING SYSTEMS

Page 54: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

S

Site Water Flow

Type B Grate

CB-9 Drainage

Access Cover at Grade

Type A Grate

Subgrade Piping

Topography

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoSewage Conditions/ Drainage

N

Page 55: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

SMARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoFire Suppression

FM-200 Fire Suppression Systems

Developed as a Halon replacement, FM-200 is the best people-compatible, clean agent �re protection for vital facilities. It extinguishes �re via a combination of chemically-based �re inhibition and cooling. It is environmentally acceptable, safe to use with sensitive equipment, fast acting, e�cient and e�ective.

FM-200 is the preferred �re suppression system for facilities that can't a�ord �re related business interruption. It is non-toxic on people.

Bene�ts of Using FM-200• Fast-Acting FM-200 can stop �res in just seconds. Extinguishing �res quickly means less damage, repair costs and extra safety. • Safe For People FM-200 has been tested extensively to ensure safe exposure to people. • No Collateral Damage FM-200 does not leave oily residues, particulates, water, or corrosive material. This eliminates collateral damage to delicate equipment.• Environmentally Responsible FM-200 has a low environmental impact because it has a low atmospheric lifetime. It also has zero potential to deplete the ozone layer. • Small Space Requirement Other �re suppression systems, such as C02 and inert gases require as much as seven times more storage space. • Globally Accepted FM-200 is the most widely accepted clean agent in the world. It is used in tens of thousands of �re suppression systems.

Page 56: Collaborative Analysis

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

S

ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS

Page 57: Collaborative Analysis

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoLighting/ Classrooms

Recessed DownlightRound Pendant 6’ Linear Pendant 8’ Linear PendantRound Pendant Recessed Downlight

Smoke Detector

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

S

REFLECTED CEILING PLAN: CLASSROOMS

Page 58: Collaborative Analysis

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoLighting/ O�ce Block

Recessed Downlight 6’ Linear Pendant 8’ Linear PendantRecessed Downlight Track Lighting Smoke Detector

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

S

REFLECTED CEILING PLAN: OFFICES

Page 59: Collaborative Analysis

Recessed DownlightRound Pendant 12’ Linear Pendant4”x4’ Semi-Recessed Ceiling Fixture Smoke Detector

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoLighting/ Spine

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

S

REFLECTED CEILING PLAN: SPINE

Page 60: Collaborative Analysis

FACADE AND ROOFING SYSTEMS

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

S

Page 61: Collaborative Analysis

View From Southeast

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

SMARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoFacades on Plans

Page 62: Collaborative Analysis

View From Northwest

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

SMARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoFacades on Plans

Page 63: Collaborative Analysis

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoAtrium Roo�ng David Haberman

High-albedo roof coatings can reduce building air-conditioning energy use. High-albedo--that is, very re�ective--coatings lower the absorption of solar energy, reduce surface temperatures, and decrease heat transfer into the building.

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

S

HIGH-ALBEDO ROOFING

Page 64: Collaborative Analysis

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoMateriality

- Ceramic frit helps control heat gain, di�use light, and can be toughened enough to gain 2 hr rating.

- Ceramic enamel frits contain �nely ground glass mixed with inorganic pigments to produce a desired color. The coated glass is then heated to about 1,150°F, fusing the frit to the glass surface, which produces a ceramic coating almost as hard and tough as the glass itself. A �red ceramic frit is durable and resists scratching, chipping, peeling, fading and chemical attacks.

View of Ceramic Frit in Whitman accentuating thedirectionality of the ‘Spine’.

Example of a typical ceramic frit pattern

Advanced Building SystemsMateriality

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

S

TRANSLUCENT CERAMIC FRIT

Page 65: Collaborative Analysis

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoMateriality

- Ceramic frit helps control heat gain, di�use light, and can be toughened enough to gain 2 hr rating.

- Ceramic enamel frits contain �nely ground glass mixed with inorganic pigments to produce a desired color. The coated glass is then heated to about 1,150°F, fusing the frit to the glass surface, which produces a ceramic coating almost as hard and tough as the glass itself. A �red ceramic frit is durable and resists scratching, chipping, peeling, fading and chemical attacks.

- Aluminum Composite Panel is composed of non-toxic and low density polyethylene core between two sheets of aluminum by using “extrude and continuous composite” compositing production line.

- The innovative product conception of seemingly contradictory properties such as excellent formability and stability, low weight and large sizes, brilliant colors and weather resistance,

- Though the core material does contain a small amount of combustible polyethylene, the main ingredient of the non-combustible mineral �lled core does not permit the proliferation of �ame and restricts smoke. It is a �re-safe mate-rial that passes mandatory requirements for exterior and interior application.It is an ideal material for external claddings, roof of pedestrian passage and other architectural applications.

View of Ceramic Frit in Whitman same as on spine to advocate the connectivity.

- Aluminum Composite Panel is composed of non-toxic and low density polyethylene core between two sheets of aluminum by using “extrude and continuous composite” compositing production line.

- The innovative product conception of seemingly contradictory properties such as excellent formability and stability, low

Advanced Building Systems

Typical Aluminum Composite Panel post-production

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

S

TRANSLUCENT CERAMIC FRIT

ALUMINUM COMPOSIT PANNEL

Page 66: Collaborative Analysis

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoOccupancy Control

Fins along fenestration functioning as occupancy sensor

- Occupancy Sensor Controls: Monitor the occupancy of individual o�ces to ensure e�cient lighting and HVAC systems usage.

ARCH

ITECTU

RAL D

ESIGN

PROJEC

T OVERVIEW

FACAD

E + ROO

FING

ELECTRICA

L SYSTEMS

PLUM

BING

SYSTEMS

BUILD

ING

AN

D SITE

MECH

AN

ICAL SYSTEM

SSTRU

CTU

RAL SYSTEM

S

SOPHISTICATED BUILDING MONITERING SYSTEM

Page 67: Collaborative Analysis

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

9/15/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoMatrix

Architectural Design

Functional Contextual Environmental Pros and Cons Intervention

Building and Site

Structural Systems

Mechanical Systems

Environmental Systems

Programmatic Systems

The structural systems for the Whitman School ofManagement consists of a steel framing grid aligned with the intersection between program-matic di�ereces. The steel structure sits atop a concrete footing base aligned similarly. The structure of the building is exposed at many pointswithin the structure allowing the skeleton of the building to show and giving the building a coolsense of value.

The buildings functional purpose is to become raised o� of the site so that the water runo� of thebuilding drains away from the structure and not towards it. It functions as a community buildingon the ground level and becomes privitized andfocused on the program above the street level.

The mechanical system works through a displace-ment ventilation. It supplies conditioned cool aircrom the AHU through a low induction di�user. Thisallowes the cool air to rise as it gets warmer creating a more comfortable environment for the occupants.

The cool air rises due to heat exchange with heatsources in the space so that the warmer air obtainsa lower density thus creating an upward convective�ows known as thermal plumes. this allows cool airto come in from outside on the lower areas of the spaces and escape through the higher spaces. The atrium is classi�ed as an outdoor space so is cut o�from the rest of the building and acquires its own systems.

The systems of the building connect to the environmentthrough the use of the atrium space primarily. It encompasses the exterior space within a living spacewithin the building and is a bu�er zone between inside and outside. The occupancy sensors on every windowallow for a minimal excess use of lighting and air conditioning. They recognize when a room is occupied or vacant and turn on and o� the systems of that roomaccordingly.

The function of the architecture is to create a seperation of program through the distinction of facade. The modernist brick facade encompasses the most private elemennts of program while the glass facades hold the more public or “usable” areas.The interior �nishes of the design are chosen to mold the stark corporate buisness and public freedom ideologies together in a learning environment that is both successful and pleasant.

The environmental design elements are numerous, one of which is the high-perfomance envelope thatminimizes the energy use of the building. Others include below-�oor air displacement, radiant coolingand heating in the atrium, highly e�cient air �ltration, occupancy radar system within the upperlevels and distribution and a very high-tech building monitoring system. Every material chosenwas picked for its low- VOC content as well as itsability to be recycled. These include carpets, paints, furniture and ceiling tiles.

Each of the material uses of the building engagethe scale and character of the surrounding structures and allow for the city to move smoothlyinto the university atmosphere. These designelements remove the harsh contrast between the low lying building elements and the more gracefulideas of the campus buildings. The circulation within the design allows one to orient themselveswithin the site at all times while simultaneously unifying the volumes. The spine is raised above the rest of the building to help out-elevate theshadow that is cast by the Sheraton to the south.

Contextually the building functions as a gatewayto the university along one of the most important and occupied streets at the university. It responds to the recent expansion into the downtown area and is a landmark upon enteringthe real estate of the university. The surrounding buildings apart from the Sheraton Hotel are alllow lying structures that do not create a lot of impact or attention. The ramp at the front of the building draws the community into the building at the �rst level.

The building maintenance practices are developedat a high ability to ensure that the building does not loose its sustainable value over time. It was designed to progress and change to the needs of the university, whether those be social or academicallowing the buildign to hold more weight within integrity of the university.

The structural systems are contextually used within the building through the use of steelframing and concrete footing. Many nearbystructures including the marshall square mallas well as the Sheraton use this exact idea fortheir designs. In addition the majority of the surrounding structures are built into hillsides, or inclines, so the footings are ajusted accordingly to give correct support and stability.

The structural system does not directly work toimporve the environment, as it is a steel framebasis with concrete footings.

Pro: The visual connection to the di�erent programmatic conceptsof the building through choice of material and design. High performancedesign and vigor in use of material.Speaks to the context of the site.

Con: Exterior spaces on the roof arenot used. The atrium can become hot because louvers are on inside sothe heat has already entered the building.

The environmental systems are designed at a highintegrity so that the building works in what seemsto be the most e�cient and sustainable way possible.Each system is designed to create low impact and maximize occupant comrfort while relating to thedirect context and drawing from existing usage ofideologies.

The environmental systems work to incorporate thesun in terms of lighting, and the greenery from other areas in the vicinity of the site. The large atrium windows function to allow maximum light into the center of the building day and year round,as well as contribute to unobstructed views of the surrounding university. The greenery works to connect life within the building to the exterior

The programmatic function of the building is toestablish a new urban fabric through the seperationof the building into seperate volumes that each take on its own function conected down the centerby what could be called a small street on each levelor “spine” that holds the volumes together. Each �oor is color coded at the important entry pointsand accented wals to allow occupants to orient themselves and lower the required exit signs or directional notices or appliances. The classrooms arelocated in one area to express the jewl quality that isteaching/learning. Each classroom = interactiveness.

The contextual idea of the program is to give thebuilding its own urban fabric through the seperation into individual volumes. It uses the form of the surrounding buildings brought together to maintain the volumetric context. The daylight thatpenetrates the building allows for a consistant linkto the exterior of the building.

The environmental systems withing the buildingtake from the context directly and incorporatethe greenery within the building to make interiormesh with interior.

The atrium program allows the for the maximumsun exposure year round and for the most hoursin a day.

Pro: The building allows for the siteto be least impacted because it israised as high as possible. The walk-ways accomodate ideas of connectionto the university.

Con: The buildings “back” is turned tothe gateway shutting the jem of thecouryard out.

Manipulate city side of building face

Alternate materials to increase sustainability?

Integrate cafe/ social space to passing tra�c.

Alternate cooling in atrium/ possible

Usable upper exterior space. Louvres inatrium on exterior of building/ shading device.

Pro: The construction process reducesthe cost of the building. Keeps the engineering simple. Common materials make it easier to acquire.

Con: The sustainability rating of the design su�ers for lack of reusable materials. Lack of aesthetic where structure is exposed.

Pro: They work to increase the sustainability and environmentallyfriendly aspects of the design. They allow for more pleasant conditionswithin the occupied spaces.

Con: Does’nt keep atrium cool enough. Takes up space that could be communal.

Pro: They connect the environment andbuilding that is otherwise always keptseperate. Allows for the feel of exterior space.

Con: Hard to maintain plants and theirshed/ change.

Pro: Allows for the seperation of people and their studies. Allows for a communal space within the center of the program through the spine.

Con: Seperates the communal spaceon the ground �oor and the class spaceon the upper �oors, and the professionalspace in the “seperate building”

Page 68: Collaborative Analysis

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

9/15/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoMatrix

Functional Contextual Environmental Redesign

The environmental design elements are numerous, one of which is the high-perfomance envelope thatminimizes the energy use of the building. Others include below-�oor air displacement, radiant coolingand heating in the atrium, highly e�cient air �ltration, occupancy radar system within the upperlevels and distribution and a very high-tech building monitoring system. Every material chosenwas picked for its low- VOC content as well as itsability to be recycled. These include carpets, paints, furniture and ceiling tiles.

Contextually the building functions as a gatewayto the university along one of the most important and occupied streets at the university. It responds to the recent expansion into the downtown area and is a landmark upon enteringthe real estate of the university. The surrounding buildings apart from the Sheraton Hotel are alllow lying structures that do not create a lot of impact or attention. The ramp at the front of the building draws the community into the building at the �rst level.

The building maintenance practices are developedat a high ability to ensure that the building does not loose its sustainable value over time. It was designed to progress and change to the needs of the university, whether those be social or academicallowing the buildign to hold more weight within integrity of the university. the green spaces within and without the building aid in the consistant highair quality.

The systems of the building connect to the environmentthrough the use of the atrium space primarily. It encompasses the exterior space within a living spacewithin the building and is a bu�er zone between inside and outside. The occupancy sensors on every windowallow for a minimal excess use of lighting and air conditioning. They recognize when a room is occupied or vacant and turn on and o� the systems of that roomaccordingly.

The environmental systems work to incorporate thesun in terms of lighting, and the greenery from other areas in the vicinity of the site. The large atrium windows function to allow maximum light into the center of the building day and year round,as well as contribute to unobstructed views of the surrounding university. The greenery works to connect life within the building to the exterior

The environmental systems withing the buildingtake from the context directly and incorporatethe greenery within the building to make interiormesh with interior.

The atrium program allows the for the maximumsun exposure year round and for the most hoursin a day.

Architectural Design

Building and Site

Structural Systems

Mechanical Systems

Environmental Systems

Programmatic Systems

There are some environmental design aspects of whitman that could be enhanced or changed. The �rst is the protruding occupancy sensorson the exterior of the brick-clad o�ce segment. They hinder the windows in their ability to open and allow natural circulation to variate the microclimate within.

Our intervention for the occupancy sensor windows on the brick-clad o�ce block, incorporates operable windows that allow naturalair to enter the space and alter the otherwise completely air conditioned rooms. This change will optimally allow the HVAC (radiators and air di�users) to work less to condition the air spaceas the occupancy sensors will sense that there is natural air circulation, there-fore halting the need for constant conditioned air.

A proposed intervention for this drawback is a curved wall element that draws the public of downtown into the backside of the building in a more street like maner. The curved wall/ atrium is clad in yellow like the walls of the main atrium. it would open the backside of the building and visually draw the public into the program. A seperate idea of a green roof for the atrium contributes to the lack of green space in the urban fabric of the marshall street area. It would allow the roof which is otherwise a hot �at surface to be accessable.

Change-

Drawback-

As a contextual gateway to the university, the design of whitman more or less turns its back to the city. The captivating design elementshappen towards the entrance with the atrium, entrance walkway, and glass cladding. The brick facade relates to the context of the city but apart from the protruding element of the spine glass, does little else to announce the start of the University. A drawback to the environmental qualitiesof the building and site is that it minimally uses the idea of greenery within the design. The building claims that itdraws from walnut park on campus in terms of trees and grass but it is of minimal use.Change-

Drawback-

The mechanical systems within Whitman use an air displacement system which can control the air quality alreay found within the building. The drawback comes because of the lack of natural ventilation whithin the building as a whole. Everything is sealed o� from the exterior which provides a clear seperation from the feeling of natural air �ow.

The large intervention proposed, deals with the lack of air �ow through the �rst three �oors. the proposal pushes the o�ces back towardmarshall street and uses the interior space to create an atrium that protrudes through the north wall to not only visually connectthe building to the site movement and downtown, but funnels the windward breeze into the north side through the 5 �oor atriumallowing for less wear and use of the air displacement system, and greater utilization of natural ventilation.

Change-

Drawback-

The design utilizes natural daylight in the atrium, upper hallways, and inside the classrooms, as well as through the normalized windows on the o�ce mass. The design for natural daylight does not incorporate the ground �oor level, or the shaded side of the north and north eastern side of the building. This creates greater work for the mechanical system through the greater use of arti�cal lighting.

The alteration can be considerd linked to the green roof proposal. The environmental systems for whitman can be enhanced throughthe use of the green roof’s rain/waste water collection abilities, the photosynthesis of the plants enhance the oxygen quality in the area,and connect to the park. The building will be able to save energy through the insulation and lessen heat gain during the summer. It would allow people to exerience these environmental system and would lessen wind load on the building.

Change-

Drawback-

The drawback to having sunlight so exposed to such a large glass space is that the space becomes very hot very quickly when exposedwith such little shading. The space has no outlets for the heat as the upper �oors are completely cut o� from the space, and thereforethe heat can only escape through the small vents in the roof. The atrium uses things such as high albedo roo�ng to help cut down onheat but the problem still persists.

An alteration to this e�ect is to have the louvers in the atrium ajustable to allow for the complete block out of the sun at the hottest points during the summer months. This would decrease the heat a�ect within the atrium and decrease the need for air conditioningwithin the space. A second proposal is to have a thermal wall mass that would replace the otherwise programmaticly colored yellow wall. the mass would collect the direct heat of the penetratin sun and harnes it, releasing it into the space during the night which would bea more e�cient system than air di�users and strip vents, or an air displacement system.

Change-

Drawback-

Page 69: Collaborative Analysis

Thermal M

assing Wall

Thermal Massing Wall and Louvres + Adjustable O�ce Windows

Green Roof on A

triumN

atural Ventilation Break

Page 70: Collaborative Analysis

Concrete, Thermal Mass

Adjustable Louvers

- A Thermal Wall in the atrium will allow us to store heat throughout the day during the cold months and radiate at night to provide warmth while the space is being used for studies at night.

- The total window area is about 50,000 ft, the thermal mass for this area is about30,000 while the maximum area for 24,000 ft. The dominant heating method is an airdisplacement system, so the thermal mass can save about 12% heating load.

Day rendering showing new Concrete, Thermal Mass.

Night rendering showing new Concrete, Thermal Mass.

Existing Space

Existing Space

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoThermal Mass

Thermal M

assing Wall

Green Roof on A

triumN

atural Ventilation Break

Page 71: Collaborative Analysis

Thermal M

assing Wall

Green Roof on A

triumN

atural Ventilation Break

35*

Summer | DailyWinter | Sunrise and Sunset

5 degrees (Perpendicular to glass)

December 21st | 3 P.M.

15 degrees

December 21st | 12 P.M.

25 degrees

Equinoxes 21st | 11 A.M.

35 degrees

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoThermal Mass

Tracking Louvers using a mechanical Pulley System

Noon - June 21st Angle - 66*

Noon - December 21stAngle - 25*

16:33

19:19

20:475:25

6:42

7:33

10°

20°

30°

40°

50°

60°70°

80°

9 amNoon3 pm6 pmSunrise/SunsetDecember 21EquinoxesJune 21

- Making the Louvers track the low sun angle during the winter will allow more sunlightt to land upon the thermal mass. In summer they will remain at the same angle as how they curently exist, keeping most of the sunrays out of the space.

Page 72: Collaborative Analysis

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoThermal Mass

Thermal M

assing Wall

Green Roof on A

triumN

atural Ventilation Break

Set-back Window slides back on track

Set-back Windowslides across behindthe Occupancy Sensor

Adjustable Office Windows

Existing New

Page 73: Collaborative Analysis

Existing Office Windows

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoThermal Mass

Thermal M

assing Wall

Green Roof on A

triumN

atural Ventilation Break

Set-back Windowslides across behindthe Occupancy Sensor

Page 74: Collaborative Analysis

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoThermal Mass

Thermal M

assing Wall

Green Roof on A

triumN

atural Ventilation Break

Operable Office Windows

Set-back Window slides back on track

Page 75: Collaborative Analysis

Thermal M

assing Wall

Green Roof on A

triumN

atural Ventilation Break

Green Roof Atrium

Page 76: Collaborative Analysis

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoGreen Roof

Thermal M

assing Wall

Green Roof on A

triumN

atural Ventilation Break

Conventional Tar Roo�ng

Proposed Extensive Green Roo�ng

Used High Albedo Roo�ng

Increase in energy savings is temporary and labor costs are signi�cant in comparison to saving. The 24 % loss in cooling energy savings after the �rst year is a result of dirt accumulation- minimizing the re�ectivenessof the albedo.

The green roof curbes the urban heat island e�ect, allowing for the e�ciencyof energy use to become a gaining relationship. it uses the low lying plants towork as a blanket insulator to keep the heat out of the building in summer andinside during winter. A green roof helps in the city of syracuse because of the unpradictability of weather and it lowers the possibility of corrosion in areaslike street and sewer areas through the e�cient use of drainage and rain waterto aid in the plant life.

Tar roo�ng creates a heat gain that in turn, generates what is calledheat island e�ect. This contributes to global warming as none of theenergy is harnessed or used within the building. It forces the building ssystems to work harder to actively heat and cool the interior.

E F F I C I E N C Y O F E N E R G Y C O O L I N G

E F F I C I E N C Y O F E N E R G Y C O O L I N G

E F F I C I E N C Y O F E N E R G Y C O O L I N G

24% loss

75% loss

25% gain

Page 77: Collaborative Analysis

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoGreen Roof

Thermal M

assing Wall

Green Roof on A

triumN

atural Ventilation Break

CONVENTIONAL VS. GREEN

1

2

-0.50

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

3.00

2.50

3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21

Average Roof Heat Flux

Average Roof Surface Temperature

Eastern Conventional Roo�ng- peak surface temp: 130 degrees at 1pmEastern Green Roo�ng- peak surface temp: 93 degrees at 10pm

1

o

80

60

100

120

140

3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21

Conventional roofs are what make up a large part of Syracuse city’s impervious survaces and contribute to two key problems. They create and urban heat island e�ect as well as urban storm-water runo� which contribute to the consumption of energy and increase the need for water as well as energy systems to deal with the excess of both that is produced. With the intervention of a green roof system , our goal is to cut down on our water and energy excessproduction and save both directly and indirectly. We plan to use the green roof to cover andprovide a blanket of shade to reduce the heat gain of the surface area.

The current system uses High-Albedo Roo�ng wich is a low heat gain material, however the a�ect the sun has on the atrium space calles for a 0 heat gain surface which the green roof cansupply.

HEA

T FL

UX,

BTU

/h -

ft

HOUR OF DAY

Tem

pera

ture

F

HOUR OF DAY

Page 78: Collaborative Analysis

“If I could change something about this buildinging, being a buisness �nance student, it would be the fact that no one can go outside and experience the roof of the atrium which looks like it was meant to walk on. It is always locked but it would be awesome to see the view and hang out up there. I think they lock it because at some points during the year it gets so sindy, it could literally blow you over.” -Kelly class of 2012

EXISTING ATRIUM ROOF CONDITION

Existing Roof Wind Condition

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoGreen Roof

Thermal M

assing Wall

Green Roof on A

triumN

atural Ventilation Break

Page 79: Collaborative Analysis

A green roof intervention will incorporate an extensive green roof design, meaning that it will containshallow soil and low growing plants spread horizontally across the roof plane. They will consist of grassesand other succulents that can withstand and grow in the more extreme weather climates, including large exposure to sunlight and harsh winds.

The extensive green roof will be more cost e�ective than an intensive green roof, the other of its kind that uses more material to allow larger plants to grow, as well as a greater support system. The intervention willutilize the existing structure that is currently placed for aesthetic appeal and requires the minimal additionalmaterial .

Proposed Roof Wind Condition

INTERVATION :ATRIUM ROOF CONDITION

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoGreen Roof

Thermal M

assing Wall

Green Roof on A

triumN

atural Ventilation Break

Page 80: Collaborative Analysis

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoGreen Roof

Thermal M

assing Wall

Green Roof on A

triumN

atural Ventilation Break

MODULAR GREEN ROOF INSTALLATION

Plants/ Sedum - The top layer consists of a variety of sedum (a low maintenance plant that can survive in the harsh conditions of Syracuse NY. It utilizes six di�erent types of sexum: - Sedum re�uxum, - Sedum sexangulare, - Sedum acre, - Sedum kamschaticum, - Sedum spurium “Fuldaglut” - Sedum album.

Lightweight, FLL-Approved Growth Medium - Lighter weight that most topsoils, this growth medium works to drain storm water and is weed free. Its support capability is between 4.8 and 6 pounds psf per inch depth, and prevents harmful substances from �owing into runo�. It holds the water that is caught and does not compact once plan examples are granulated clay or shale mixed with organic compounds or fertilizer.

Oldroyd XV20 Green Xtra Drainage Layer (49-70% Recycled) - increases drainage rate and water holding capacity. Holds 1.63 pounds of water (0.2 gallons/ 0.31” of rain) crush resistance and strength.

Oldroyd TP Filter Fleece- minimize weight and optimize water management as well as prevents the water spread on the surface of the roof. Itprovides a simpler installation method, as there is an already existing grid on the roof.

Concrete Slab - The bottom layer is a concrete deck slab with will provide the base for the green roof as well as span the distance for the new structural addition and strengthening areas.

Adhered Moisture- Resistant Gypsum Board - like the waterproof membrane the moisture-resistant board relieves underground water-created pressure and resists the penetration of water from under the green oof into the structure

Suitable Waterproof Membrane- provides moisture resistance to prevent water from entering below the sealant and into the space.

Adhered Sure-Weld TPO Single-ply membrane- heat weldable sheet that has a high breaking strengthand puncture resistance. resistance to UV rays, oxidation and is 100% recyclable

- Inexpensive Installation

- Insulation allows the meeting of code while reducing excess roof insulation

Page 81: Collaborative Analysis

PROPOSED GREEN ROOF CONDITIONPROPOSED GREEN ROOF CONDITION

Studies show that the plant life on the green roof minimizethe amount of storm water runo� and the photosynthesis of the plantsreduces the amount of greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere.

The �at feature of the high albedo roo�ng encouragesdust and dirt to accumulate on the surface, thereforecomprimising the integrity of the use of the material.It also forms a negative pocket of wind thatneglects the use of the roof by the public.

Intensi�ed Structure

Waterproof LayeringGrowth Sedum

Tree Plant Boxes

Accessibility

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoGreen Roof

Thermal M

assing Wall

Green Roof on A

triumN

atural Ventilation Break

Page 82: Collaborative Analysis

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoGreen Roof

Thermal M

assing Wall

Green Roof on A

triumN

atural Ventilation Break

H I G H A L B E D O R O O F I N G G R E E N R O O F I N G

3 INCHES OF SEDUM

15-20 LBS PSF WHEN SATURATED

1-2 LBS OF PLANTLIFE

.5 LBS OF FILTER MEMBRANE

HIGH ALBEDO ROOFING

SEALANT MEMBRANE

Existing Structure

Existing Concrete Slab

2,979 SQ FT OF ROOF AREA ABOVE ATRIUM

LIVE LOAD + OCCUPIED BY PEOPLE

62,559 + LBS OF GREEN ROOF

1 SQ

FT

OF

ALB

EDO

RO

OF

1 SQ

FT

OF

GRE

EN R

OO

F

- ALBEDO ROOFING + GREEN ROOFING = ADDITIONAL

Page 83: Collaborative Analysis

Thermal M

assing Wall

Green Roof on A

triumN

atural Ventilation Break

Natural Ventilation Break

Page 84: Collaborative Analysis

MARTIN J. WHITMANMARTIN J. WHITMANMARTIN J. WHITMANMARTIN J. WHITMANMARTIN J. WHITMANMARTIN J. WHITMANMARTIN J. WHITMANMARTIN J. WHITMANMARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoNATURAL VENTILATION BREAK

Thermal M

assing Wall

Green Roof on A

triumN

atural Ventilation Break

Natural Ventilation BreakAdjustable Wind Tracking Fins that inhabit the ventilation break allow controlled natrual air to enter the windwardside of the building lessening the requirement anduse of the current HVAC system

Current Site Wind Flow Direction

Intervention Site Wind Flow Direction

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

5 mph

10 mph

15 mph

20 mph

25 mph

30 mph

Average Wind Speed- Syracuse

MaximumAverage

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

5 mph

10 mph

15 mph

20 mph

25 mph

30 mph

Average Wind Speed- Syracuse

MaximumAverage

Page 85: Collaborative Analysis

Gathering Spaces

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoNATURAL VENTILATION BREAK

Thermal M

assing Wall

Green Roof on A

triumN

atural Ventilation Break

Spaces along the ‘Spine’ which have become gathering spaces for students to work on the Concourse to Third level and for faculty events on the Forth Floor.

Existing Comcourse Existing 1st �oor Existing 2nd �oor Existing 3rd �oor Existing 4th �oor

Page 86: Collaborative Analysis

Section showing existing condition

Plan showing existing condition

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoNATURAL VENTILATION BREAK

Thermal M

assing Wall

Green Roof on A

triumN

atural Ventilation Break

Strip vents

Page 87: Collaborative Analysis

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoNATURAL VENTILATION BREAK

Thermal M

assing Wall

Green Roof on A

triumN

atural Ventilation Break

Section showing intervention and movement of program to the East tower

Page 88: Collaborative Analysis

Passive Ventilation Systems

Concourse Level

First Floor

Second- Fourth Floor

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoNATURAL VENTILATION BREAK

Thermal M

assing Wall

Green Roof on A

triumN

atural Ventilation Break

Occupants within the building prefer natural ventilation and air,therefore the opening of the windward North side of the buildingwould draw the wind through the corridor (streets) making this idea of natural ventilation feasable. The pressure di�erentiation from the north to the south building with the wind movement draws air through the hallways and up through the atrium allowing the occupants to experience a change from the arti�cially conditionedair in the current design.

Page 89: Collaborative Analysis

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoNATURAL VENTILATION BREAK

Thermal M

assing Wall

Green Roof on A

triumN

atural Ventilation Break

Warm Exterior Temperatures- Showing the Louvers in their open stage to allowfor natural ventilation from the windward side

Page 90: Collaborative Analysis

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoNATURAL VENTILATION BREAK

Thermal M

assing Wall

Green Roof on A

triumN

atural Ventilation Break

Cold Exterior Temperatures- Showing the Louvers in their closed stage to allow for the building to gain heat in the winte

Page 91: Collaborative Analysis

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoNATURAL VENTILATION BREAK

Thermal M

assing Wall

Green Roof on A

triumN

atural Ventilation Break

Page 92: Collaborative Analysis

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoNATURAL VENTILATION BREAK

Thermal M

assing Wall

Green Roof on A

triumN

atural Ventilation Break

The original Structure does not allow for natural ventalationto pierce the spine through the windward side of the building.Origional Structure

Conditioined air is brought up through the air ventilationsystem and arti�cially conditions the spine.

Page 93: Collaborative Analysis

Peeling the windward facade open calls for a manipulation of the structure attached to the spine therefore scaling down the o�ce and cafe program on the maine street side of thebuilding. To make up for the loss the extracted program will be placed on the top of the 6th �oor non street side of the o�ce zonewith intervention fresh air can be supplied to the communal

spaces overlooking the atrium on the second and third �oors as well as the spine of the building and tha atrium during the warm months of the year

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoNATURAL VENTILATION BREAK

Thermal M

assing Wall

Green Roof on A

triumN

atural Ventilation Break

Manipulated Structure

Page 94: Collaborative Analysis

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoNATURAL VENTILATION BREAK

Thermal M

assing Wall

Green Roof on A

triumN

atural Ventilation Break

Design Capacity (kBtu/h)

1644.3

Design Flow Rate (ft3/min)

185617

Total Cooling Load (kBtu/h)

1470.4

Sensible (kBtu/h)

1103.3

Humidity (%)

464.7

Floor Area (ft2)

29315.1

Latent (kBtu/h)

327

Volume (ft3)

469110

f3/min (ft2)

44.62

Design Capacity (kBtu/h)

1803.3

Design Flow Rate (ft3/min)

198144

Total Cooling Load (kBtu/h)

1568

Sensible (kBtu/h)

1211.6

Humidity (%)

464.9

Floor Area (ft2)

29315.1

Latent (kBtu/h)

356.3

Volume (ft3)

469110.1

f3/min (ft2)

44.96

I N T E R V E N T I O N C O O L I N G L O A D J U L Y 1st

E X I S T I N G C O O L I N G L O A D J U L Y 1st

159 12,527 97.4 258.8 29.3

Page 95: Collaborative Analysis

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoNATURAL VENTILATION BREAK

Thermal M

assing Wall

Green Roof on A

triumN

atural Ventilation Break

M O D I F I E D C O O L I N G L O A D A P R I L - J U N E

O R I G I O N A L C O O L I N G L O A D A P R I L - J U N E

0

-2000

-4000

-6000

-8000

-10000

-12000

-14000

0

-2000

-4000

-6000

-8000

-10000

-12000

-14000

Page 96: Collaborative Analysis

Intervention e�ect on current lighting

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoNATURAL VENTILATION BREAK

Thermal M

assing Wall

Thermal M

assing Wall

Green Roof on A

triumN

atural Ventilation Break

Page 97: Collaborative Analysis

MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Advanced Building Systems

12/5/11

Weston Halkyard Tanner Halkyard David HabermanRhett BrunoNATURAL VENTILATION BREAK

Thermal M

assing Wall

Green Roof on A

triumN

atural Ventilation Break