Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Cognitive Modelling Goes To SchoolMODELLING CONVERGENT AND DIVERGENT PROCESSES
IN SOCIAL EXPLORATORY SEARCH AND LEARNING
TOBIAS LEYTALLINN UNIVERSITY, ESTONIA
CELDA 2018KEYNOTE
21.10.2018
LEARNING ANALYTICS & EDUCATIONAL INNOVATIONTallinn University, Estonia
http://ceiter.tlu.ee
Research Group on
Horizon 2020
Widening
Kenneth R. Koedinger, John R. Anderson, William H. Hadley, Mary A. Mark. Intelligent Tutoring Goes
To School in the Big City. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (IJAIED), 1997,
8, pp.30-43.
“This study provides further
evidence that laboratory tutoring
systems can be scaled up and
made to work, both technically
and pedagogically, in real and
unforgiving settings like urban
high schools.”
Koedinger, et al. (1997), pp.30
ADRESSING NEW CHALLENGES- From Direct Instruction to
Exploratory Learning
- Learning goals dynamically change
in the learning process
- Learning is socially mediated
Learning in Realistic Contexts
S O C I A L LY- M E D I AT E D
S E L F - D I R E C T E D L E A R N I N G
Individual
Search and
Sensemaking
Collaborative
Knowledge
Building
Modelling Memory
Processes
Designing Support Mechanisms
(Intelligent Learning Systems)
Collaborative
Information
Search on the
Web
Discovery
Learning in
School
How working
memory and
long term
memory
interact to learn
categories?
Role of
Working
Memory
Capacity?
COLLABORATIVE KNOWLEDGE BUILDING & INDIVIDUAL LEARNING- Individual and collective
knowledge creation tightly
linked
- Negotiation Processes in Social
Software Environments(Cress, Kimmerle, et al. 2016; Jirschitzka et
al. 2017; Kump et al., 2013)
ToiletHow To
Lightning Solution
X3-PJC
X3-POZ
PLC Equipment
S O C I A L
B O O K M A R K I N G
E N V I R O N M E N T
Collaborative Information
Search in groups of university
students (N=24)
Ley, T., & Seitlinger, P. (2015). Dynamics of Human Categorization in a Collaborative Tagging
System: How Social Processes of Semantic Stabilization Shape Individual Sensemaking.
Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 140–151.
C O N V E R G E N C E
I N T H E G R O U P
S T R E N G T H E N S
I N D I V I D U A L
L E A R N I N G
Semantic Stabilization in the
Group leads to stronger
memory traces for the used
conceptsC
um
ula
tive
re
lative
fre
qu
en
cy
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
6 7 8 9 10
GeneralMediumSpecific
Low semantic stabilization
Weeks
Cu
mu
lative
re
lative
fre
qu
en
cy
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
6 7 8 9 10
GeneralMediumSpecific
High semantic stabilization
Weeks
Collaborative Knowledge
Building
Collaborative Information Search on
the Web
Role of Memory in Convergent and
Divergent Group Processes
Individual Search and
Sensemaking
Discovery Learning in Secondary
School
Role of Working Memory Capacity
COLLABORATIVE KNOWLEDGE BUILDING
How to reach consensus?
How to deal with divergence?
H O W D O E S
C O N S E N S U S
E M E R G E ?
Verbatim tag imitation:
Copying the word(e.g. Dellschaft & Staab, 2008; Halpin et al., 2007;
Rader & Wash, 2008)
Semantic imitation:
Tag-based Topic Inference(e.g. Fu et al., 2009, 2010)
Seitlinger, P., Ley, T., & Albert, D. (2015). Verbatim and semantic imitation in indexing
resources on the Web: A fuzzy-trace account of social tagging. Applied Cognitive
Psychology, 29(1), 32–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3067
A M O D E L O F S O C I A L T A G G I N G :
F U Z Z Y T R A C E T H E O R Y
Imitation of Tag t (time n+1)
explicit imitation p(t) = D implicit imitation p(t) = R*J
Encoding
verbatim trace (direct access D) gist-trace (reconstruction R)
Tag-based Search for Resources (at time n)
Perception of Tag t
J=Familiarity-based Judgement
(e.g. Brainerd et al., 2010)
BOOK
BOOK
“BOOK”
book
novelread
author
<book>
A N E X P E R I M E N T U S I N G T H E
RT T T- P R O C E D U R E (Brainerd et al., 2002)
N=39, age M=32
Phase R: Incidental Learning of tags
in a decision task
Phase T: Production of tags
(previously learned or not)
recall
processes
tagging
user
social
Imitation
search
semantic
M AT E R I A L U S E D :
P H O T O S A N D TA G S
M E A S U R E M E N T M O D E LMultinomial Processing Tree (adapted from Brainerd et al., 2010)
ImitationRecall state
Recall state
Recall state
Stimulus
Resource
Direct access
Verbatim
No direct access
Recon-struction
Choosing old tag
Semantic
Choosing new tag
Semantic
No recon-struction
Guessing old tag
Idiosyncratic tagging
Not guessing old tag
Idiosyncratic tagging
R E S E A R C H Q U E S T I O N S
- What role do verbatim and semantic processes play when
imitating tags?
- D: Direct access to varbatim trace
- R: Reconstruction of gist trace
- J: Familiarity-based decision
- Can these processes be dissociated using practically significant
variables?
- Tag size
- Semantic Layout of tag clouds (e.g. Lohmann et al., 2009; Rivadeneira et al., 2007;
Schrammel et al., 2009)
- Word connectivity: density of generated associations (Nelson et al., 1998)
PA R A M E T E R E S T I M AT E S
Verbatim and Gist traces (for explicit and semantic imitation) are
represented by independent parameters D and R
A good amount of tag-processing and production is implicit (R and J)
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
E R J G
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
E R J G
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
E R J G
Connectivity
Tag-Size
Semantic Layout
SEMANTIC & VERBATIM IMITATIONSemantic imitation constant at around 13%
Verbatim imitation depends on conditions
(20% vs. 8%)
Other influencing factors
Semantic Layout of Tags → R
Size of Tags → J
Connectivity of Tags → D
F R O M A M E A S U R E M E N T T O A
C O M P U TAT I O N A L M O D E L
3Layers - A tag recommeder
based on verbatim and semantic
processing
Based on ALCOVE – a
connectionist model of category
learning
Seitlinger, P., Kowald, D., Trattner, C., & Ley, T.
(2013). Recommending Tags with a Model of
Human Categorization. In Conference on
Information and Knowledge Management,
CIKM’13, Oct. 27–Nov. 1, 2013, San Francisco,
CA, USA. (pp. 2381–2386).
Encode the resource in terms of
topics or categories
Match the pattern to all previously
encountered examples
Activate the tags from those
examples
Draw tags depending on
their activation
C A N T H E A L G O R I T H M G U E S S
W H I C H T A G S P E O P L E W I L L U S E ?
- Using Wikipedia pages
tagged in Delicious
- Algorithm recommends
tags from previous tags
of that user
- Reinforces convergence
CONVERGENCE& DIVERGENCEIn Social Tagging Research
Convergence is usually highlighted
(consistent indexing of resources)
Divergent Search important for
effective problem solving
(Lazer & Bernstein, 2010)
D I V E R G E N T P R O C E S S E S I N
I N F O R M AT I O N S E A R C H
- Trade-off: Fluency (Flat Associative Hierarchy)
vs. Consistency (Steep Associative Hierarchy)
- Research Questions
- Evidence for the trade-off?
- Supporting information search with recommender?
- Study: Individual and collaborative information
search at the workplace (one month, N=18)
Seitlinger, P., Ley, T., Kowald, D., Theiler, D., Hasani-Mavriqi, I., Dennerlein, S., Albert,
D. (2018). Balancing the Fluency-Consistency Tradeoff in Collaborative Information
Search with a Recommender Approach. International Journal of Human–Computer
Interaction, 34(6), 557–575.
C O L L A B O R AT I V E I N F O R M AT I O N
S E A R C H M A K E S P E O P L E M O R E
C R E AT I V E …
Collaborative
search leads to
higher fluency of
associations …
… B U T L E A D S T O L O W E R
L E V E L S O F C O N S I S T E N C Y
… weaker
relationship between
topic and tags used
H O W T O S U P P O R T
C O N S I S T E N C Y D U R I N G
C R E AT I V E S E R C H ?
- Recommender 1: Most Popular (MPT)
- Recommender 2: Search of Memory (SoMe)
- Similar to the 3Layers Recommender
- Based on Episodic Memory Model MINERVA2
S o M e H A S H I G H E R
A C C E P TA N C E I N
C O L L A B O R AT I V E S E A R C H
CONVERGENCE& DIVERGENCECollaboration leads to higher levels of
creativity
But also to lower levels of consistency
Need a recommendation paradigm
based on semantic processing
Individual Search and
Sensemaking
Discovery Learning in Secondary
School
Role of Working Memory Capacity
SELF-DIRECTED SEARCH AND SENSEMAKING
D I S C O V E R Y L E A R N I N G I N
S C H O O L : S E A R C H A N D
S E N S E M A K I N G
Reflective Search Model
Information
Goal
Search
Find
Information
Sensemaking
Attention
Control
D I S C O V E R Y L E A R N I N G I N
S C H O O L : S E A R C H A N D
S E N S E M A K I N G
- 8th and 9th grade pupils (N = 109)
- Independent Variable
- Working Memory Capacity (WMC): high vs. low
- Dependent Variable
- Learning Curves
- Search and sensemaking
in DinoNimi
Seitlinger, P., Uus, Õ., & Ley, T. (2018). The role of working memory capacity in a self-regulated search
and sense-making task for high school biology. Computers in Human Behavior. Under Review.
… is due to better retrieval of previously learned
categories (sensemaking) …
… and more strategic search.
Group x Practice: F(6,318)
= 2.24, p < .05
Group: F(1,55) =
4.41, p < .05
𝛘(4) = 15.58, p < .01
Performance Difference between
high and low Working Memory
Capacity condition …
L E A R N I N G C AT E G O R I E S I N
S U S TA I N
Inhibition of interference
(Unsworth & Engle)
Empirical
Pattern
Simulated
Pattern
TAKE AWAYS
1.T H E S O C I A L
&
I N D I V I D U A L
- Coupling of social and individual learning
- Convergence in group important for individual learning
- Importance of social cues for creative thought
- Mapping of internal and external (e.g. fluency and tagging)
- Cultural production of patterns and individual learning
- Formal model of Sociocultural Learning Theory
Ley, T., Seitlinger, P., & Pata, K. (2016). Patterns of Meaning in a Cognitive Ecosystem: Modeling
Stabilization and Enculturation in Social Tagging Systems. In U. Cress, H. Jeong, & J. Moskaliuk (Eds.),
Mass Collaboration and Education (pp. 143–163). Heidelberg: Springer.
2.
- Coupling is mediated by our memory processes
- Working memory and long term memory as a
sensemaking machine
- Executive functions control attention and
shield search and retrieval
MEMORY
3.
- Cognitive Models mimic human exploratory learning
- … and allow diagnosis and support in open ended
learning tasks
- “Learning Analytics” made theory-driven rather than
data-driven
ASSI STI NG
LEARNI NG
REFERENCESDennerlein, S., Seitlinger, P., Lex, E., & Ley, T. (2016). Take up My Tags: Exploring Benefits of Meaning Making in a Collaborative Learning Task at the Workplace.
In K. Verbert, M. Sharples, & T. Klobučar (Eds.), Adaptive and Adaptable Learning: 11th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (Vol. 9891, pp.
377–383). Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45153-4_30
Dennerlein, S., Tomberg, V., Treasure-jones, T., Theiler, D., Lex, E., & Ley, T. (2018). The Role of Memory and Sensemaking in Healthcare Professionals’ Informal
Learning at Work: A Design-Based Research Study. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, Under Review
Kopeinik, S., Eskandar, A., Ley, T., Albert, D., & Seitlinger, P. (2018). Adapting an open source social bookmarking system to observe critical information behaviour.
In S. Dietze, M. D’Aquin, D. Gasevic, E. Herder, & J. Kimmerle (Eds.), Workshop Linked Learning 2018, Companion Proceedings of the WebSci 2018. Retrieved
from https://websci18.webscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/WebSci18_Events_PreProceedings-4-Linked_Learning_2018-lres.pdf
Ley, T., Seitlinger, P., & Pata, K. (2016). Patterns of Meaning in a Cognitive Ecosystem: Modeling Stabilization and Enculturation in Social Tagging Systems. In U.
Cress, H. Jeong, & J. Moskaliuk (Eds.), Mass Collaboration and Education (pp. 143–163). Heidelberg: Springer.
Ley, T., Leoste, J., Poom-Valickis, K., Rodríguez-Triana, M. J., Gillet, D., & Väljataga, T. (2018a). Analyzing Co-Creation in Educational Living Labs using the
Knowledge Appropriation Model. In Workshop on Co-Creation in the Design, Development and Implementation of Technology-Enhanced Learning (CC-TEL’18).
Aachen: CEUR Workshop Proceedings. Retrieved from http://www.ceur-ws.org/Vol-2190/CC-TEL_2018_paper_1.pdf
Ley, T., Maier, R., Thalmann, S., Waizenegger, C., Pata, K., & Ruiz-Calleja, A. (2018b). Adopting and Sustaining Innovation: A Knowledge Appropriation Model to
Connect Knowledge Creation and Workplace Learning. Vocations and Learning, under review.
Seitlinger, P., Ley, T., & Albert, D. (2015). Verbatim and semantic imitation in indexing resources on the Web: A fuzzy-trace account of social tagging. Applied
Cognitive Psychology, 29(1), 32–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3067
Seitlinger, P., Ley, T., Kowald, D., Theiler, D., Hasani-Mavriqi, I., Dennerlein, S., Albert, D. (2018). Balancing the Fluency-Consistency Tradeoff in Collaborative
Information Search with a Recommender Approach. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34(6), 557–575.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1379240
Trattner, C., Kowald, D., Seitlinger, P., Ley, T., & Kopeinik, S. (2016). Modeling Activation Processes in Human Memory to Predict the Reuse of Tags. The Journal
of Web Science, 2(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1561/106.00000004
Ruiz-Calleja, A., Dennerlein, S., Tomberg, V., Pata, K., Ley, T., Theiler, D., & Lex, E. (2015). Supporting Learning Analytics for Informal Workplace Learning with a
Social Semantic Infrastructure. In G. Conole, T. Klobučar, C. Rensing, J. Konert, & E. Lavoué (Eds.), Design for Teaching and Learning in a Networked World, 10th
European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning. Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24258-3_76
07-11 January 2019
Tallinn, Estonia
http://winterschool.tlu.ee
Educational Innovation – Getting ready for the future
Educational Robotics in Preschool and Primary Education
Tobias Ley
Professor for Learning Analytics
and Educational Innovation
Tallinn University, Estonia
Twitter @tobold
http://ceiter.tlu.ee
http://tobiasley.wordpress.com
H O W D O E S
C O N S E N S U S E M E R G E ?
Verbatim tag imitation: Preferential Attachment
(e.g. Dellschaft & Staab, 2008; Halpin et al., 2007; Rader & Wash, 2008)
Semantic imitation: Tag-based Topic Inference
(e.g. Fu et al., 2009, 2010)
p(t) p(a) p(o)N(t)
N(i)i
tn p(tn+1|tn)copying tag
p(t) p(c | r) p(t |c)
tn p(tn+1|c)
reconstructing tag
BOOK BOOK
BOOK BOOK
NOVELREAD