Upload
hlmedit
View
9
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Cochise Regional Hospital Ex Parte
Citation preview
WSS:tno 2429205.1 7/16/2015 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
GUST ROSENFELD P.L.C. One S. Church Ave., Suite 1900 Tucson, Arizona 85701-1627 Telephone: (520) 628-7070 Facsimile: (520) 624-3849 Thomas M. Murphy – 003340; PCC No. 41252 William S. Sowders – 022286 [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
COCHISE REGIONAL HOSPITAL, Plaintiff, vs. SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL, in her official capacity as U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services; Marilyn Tavenner, as Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; and Cara M. Christ, as Director of the Arizona Department of Health Services, Defendant.
No. PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE MOTION FOR (1) TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER; AND (2) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
TO DEFENDANTS AND THEIR COUNSEL:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, at a time to be set by the Court, Plaintiff
Cochise Regional Hospital (“CRH”), in the courtroom of an Article III Judge of this
Court as yet to be determined, will and hereby do apply pursuant to Rule 65 of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 65-1 for a temporary restraining order
and order to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not be issued against
Sylvia Mathews Burwell, in her official capacity as U.S. Secretary of Health and
WSS:tno 2429205.1 7/16/2015 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Human Services; Marilyn Tavenner, as Administrator of the Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services; and Cara M. Christ, M.D., as Director of the Arizona Department of
Health Services.
This motion is made on the grounds that (1) Plaintiff is likely to succeed on the
merits in establishing that Defendants’ decision to terminate CRH’s Medicare provider
agreement is invalid for various violations of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of
the United States Constitution; (2) Plaintiff will suffer immediate and irreparable harm
unless the decision is enjoined; (3) the balance of hardships tips in favor of Plaintiff;
and (4) the public interest supports the issuance of a temporary restraining order and
order to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not be entered.
This application is based on the accompanying Plaintiff’s Memorandum in
Support of Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order; Supporting Declaration of Seth
Guterman, M.D.; and on such argument and evidence as may be presented at the
hearing.
Notice of this motion has been given to counsel for Defendant by Thomas
Murphy and William Sowders on July 15, 2015 via telephone and on July 16, 2015 via
email. Notice of the hearing date will be given to Defendant when that date is set.
Delivery of this application and all supporting papers to Defendant will be made on
July 16, 2015 by e-mail immediately upon the signing of this application.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 16th day of July, 2015.
GUST ROSENFELD P.L.C. By /s/ William S. Sowders (#022286)
One S. Church Ave., Suite 1900 Tucson, Arizona 85701-1627
Attorneys for Plaintiff