38
Co-evolution of network structure and content Lada Adamic School of Information & Center for the Study of Complex Systems University of Michigan

Co-evolution of network structure and content

  • Upload
    scott

  • View
    27

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Co-evolution of network structure and content. Lada Adamic School of Information & Center for the Study of Complex Systems University of Michigan. Outline. Co-evolution of network structure and content - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Co-evolution of network structure and content

Co-evolution of network structure and content

Lada AdamicSchool of Information & Center for the Study of Complex Systems

University of Michigan

Page 2: Co-evolution of network structure and content

Outline Co-evolution of network structure and content

Can the structure of Twitter and virtual world interactions reveal something about their content? http://arxiv.org/abs/1107.5543

Can the structure of a commodity futures trading network reveal something about information flowing into the market? http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?

abstract_id=1361184

Page 3: Co-evolution of network structure and content

3

What is the relationship between network structure and information diffusion?

Page 4: Co-evolution of network structure and content

Is information flowing over the network?Or is information shaping the network?

Page 5: Co-evolution of network structure and content

Can the shape of the network reveal properties of information

Big news! Giant microbes!

Page 6: Co-evolution of network structure and content

Can the shape of the network reveal properties of information

Little news. How’s the weather?

Page 7: Co-evolution of network structure and content

Related work on time evolving graphs Densification over time (Leskovec et al. 2005) Community structure over time (Leicht et al. 2007, Mucha et

al. 2010) Change in structure (ability to “compress” network) signals

events (Graphscope by Sun et al. 2007) Disease propagation & timing (Moody 2002, Liljeros 2010) Enron email (B. Aven, 2011)

Page 8: Co-evolution of network structure and content

What’s different here We look at network dynamics at relatively short time

scales and construct time series

A range of network metrics, instead of just community structure

Information novelty and diversity as opposed to tracking single events / pieces of information

Page 9: Co-evolution of network structure and content

Can the network reveal… If everyone is talking about the same thing, or if there is

just background chatter. If what they are talking about is novel?

Page 10: Co-evolution of network structure and content

10

1st context: virtual worlds

Networks: asset transfers (gestures, landmarks) and transactions (e.g. rent, object purchases)

Content: assets being transferred

Page 11: Co-evolution of network structure and content

11

Study transfers in the context of 100 groups with highest numbers of transfers

Page 12: Co-evolution of network structure and content

Second context: Twitter Network microblogging : < 140 characters / tweet

Network links read from tweets Reply or mention: by putting the @ in

front of the username

Retweet: repeat something someone else wrote on twitter, preceded by the letters RT and @ in front of their username

Page 13: Co-evolution of network structure and content

Selecting Twitter communities to track

http://wefollow.com/twitter/researcher For each “researcher” gather tweets of accounts they

follow

Page 14: Co-evolution of network structure and content

Highly dynamic networks Segmentation: Twitter: every 800

tweets median segment

duration 1.5 days SecondLife: every

50 asset transfers median segment

duration 8.4 days

% o

f edg

es re

peat

ed

Segments elapsed

Page 15: Co-evolution of network structure and content

Conductance:capturing potential for information flow

A B A BA B

low conductance

medium conductance

high conductance

Temporal conductance (summed over all pairs): High if pairs of nodes share edges, or many short,

indirect paths

Koren, North, Volinsky, KDD, 2006

Page 16: Co-evolution of network structure and content

16

Network expectedness Define expectedness:

Average conductance of all neighbor pairs at time t, based on conductance of pair at time t-1

expected

unexpected

Page 17: Co-evolution of network structure and content

Conductance and expectedness as a toy network evolves

a

b

c

d

a

b

c

a

b

c

a

b

c

network configuration at t = 0

possible configurations at t = 1

conductance = 4

conductance = 4expectedness = 1.5edge jaccard = 1

conductance = 4.5expectedness = 1.3333edge jaccard = 0.6667

conductance = 6expectedness = 0.5edge jaccard = 0.25

Page 18: Co-evolution of network structure and content

SecondLife: network structure and content

overlapt,t+1

overlap t-1,t

D diversityt, (t+1)

standard network metrics are not indicative of information properties

conductance and expectedness are

D diversityt-1, t

Page 19: Co-evolution of network structure and content

Conductance & diversity of information

High conductance brings higher content diversity

Repeat network patterns bring less diversity and less novelty

but… similarity and novelty are positively correlated (r = 0.19)

Social and transaction network of top sellers in SL

Page 20: Co-evolution of network structure and content

Twitter: textual diversity and novelty

Semantic metrics

Metric Type Computation Methods

Contemporary Metrics

(average cosine similarity of words in

Tweets)

between connected node pairs in the graphbetween indirectly-connected node pairs, i.e., non-neighbors with an undirected path of length > 1 between thembetween isolated pairs (in different components)

Novelty Metric(Language Model

distance)

between two sets of tweets associated with Twitter networks captured at different times

Page 21: Co-evolution of network structure and content

Twitter: network structure and information diversity

netw

ork

stru

ctur

e

content similarity

Page 22: Co-evolution of network structure and content

Inferring Network Semantic Information

Question: Does the network structural information help to improve the prediction performance of the characteristics of information exchanged?

Kernel Regression Prediction

Model

Semantic variables

Topological variables

Semantic variables

Page 23: Co-evolution of network structure and content

Example: Inferring the average similarity score between isolated pairs

Don’t need to use other textual variables (e.g. similarity between indirectly connected pairs) when sufficient topological information available

Reason: topological variables account for much of the pattern in the text!The input variables of curve ci start from

Xi and increase each time by adding the variable labeled on x-axis.

Page 24: Co-evolution of network structure and content

Network structure and information novelty

Greater novelty in edges corresponds to greater novelty in content shared

For nodes that are interacting (citing or being cited): Higher

conductance and expectedness correlates with less information novelty

Page 25: Co-evolution of network structure and content

25

Information in trading networks CFTC = Commodity futures trading commission stated mission: protect market users and the public

from fraud, manipulation, and abusive practices futures contracts started out as contracts for

agricultural products, but expanded to more exotic contracts, including index futures

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1361184

Collaboration with Celso Brunetti, Jeff Harris, and Andrei Kirilenko

Page 26: Co-evolution of network structure and content

Data 6.3 million transactions in Aug. 2008 in the Sept. E-mini

S&P futures contract price discovery for the index occurs mostly in this contract

(Hasbrouck (2003)) data includes: date & time, executing broker, opposite

broker, buy or sell, price, quantity sample in transaction windows of 240 transactionsexecuting broker opposite broker

quantity: 10price: $171.25

Page 27: Co-evolution of network structure and content

27

matching algorithm

limit order book

buy 30 contracts at $171.25sell 10 contracts at $171.25

sell 20 contracts at $172.00

sell 5 contracts at $171.75 buy 20 contracts at $171.50buy 50 contracts at $171.00buy 30 contracts at $171.25buy 20 contracts at $171.50

Page 28: Co-evolution of network structure and content

28

not social, not intentional, not persistent

Page 29: Co-evolution of network structure and content

Financial variablesRate of return: Last price to first price in logs (close-to-open)

Volatility: Range – log difference between max and min price

Duration: Total period duration - time in seconds between the start and end of each sampling period

Proxy for arrival of new information

Volume: Trading volume – number of contracts traded

Page 30: Co-evolution of network structure and content

30

What can we learn from network structure?e.g. centralization?

low in-centralization high in-centralization

low indegreehigh indegreehigh outdegree

low outdegree

Page 31: Co-evolution of network structure and content

31

overview of network variables

# nodes, # edges clustering coefficient, LSCC, reciprocity CEN = giniin-degree – giniout-degree

INOUT = r(indegree of node, outdegree of same node)

AI (asymmetric information)

Page 32: Co-evolution of network structure and content

Correlations between network and financial variables

High Centralization: market dominance - a dominant trader buys from many small sellers – low duration, low volume

Page 33: Co-evolution of network structure and content

Negative assortativity: large sellers sell to small buyers and vice versa – low duration, higher volume

Correlations between network and financial variables

Page 34: Co-evolution of network structure and content

High av. degree & largest strongly connected component: no news - many buyers and sellers – high duration, high volume

Correlations between network and financial variables

Page 35: Co-evolution of network structure and content

Correlations between network and financial variables

Rate of return: positive correlation with centralization

Volatility & duration: correlated with standard deviation of degree, average deg. and the total number of edges (E).Volume: Correlated with a few network variables, sign varies.

Page 36: Co-evolution of network structure and content

Conclusion Network structure alone is revealing of the diversity and

novelty information content being transmitted

Results depend on the scope and relative position of the activity in the network

Page 37: Co-evolution of network structure and content

Future work Sensitivity to inclusion of non-interactive or across-community

interactions Applying novelty & conductance metrics to financial time series Continuous formulation of novelty and other network metrics (because

segmentation is problematic) Roles of individual nodes

Thanks:

Edwin Teng Liuling Gong Avishay Livne

Information network academic research center INARC

Page 38: Co-evolution of network structure and content

Questions?