Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CNWRA PROGRAM MANAGER'S PERIODIC REPORTON ACTIVITIES OF
THE CENTER FOR NUCLEAR WASTE REGULATORY ANALYSES
For The Fiscal Reporting Period
September 26, 1992 - October 23, 1992
PMPR No. 93-01
November 6, 1992
9211160552 9?21109PDR WASTEWM-11 P
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
1. TECHNICAL. 1
1.11.21.31.41.51.61.71.8
1.91.101.11
CNWRA Operations ...................Waste Systems Engineering and Integration .....External Quality Assurance ...............Geologic Setting .....................Engineered Barrier Systems ...............Repository Design, Construction, and OperationsPerformance Assessment ................Research ..........................Research Project I -Research Project 2 -Research Project 3 -Research Project 4 -Research Project 5 -Research Project 6 -
Research Project 7 -Research Project 9 -Research Project 10 -Research Project 11 -
Overall Research .......................Geochemistry.Thermohydrology.Seismic Rock Mechanics ...................Integrated Waste Package Experiments ..........Stochastic Analysis of Large-Scale Flow and Transportin Unsaturated Fractured Rock ...............Geochemical Analogs .....................Sorption Modeling ....................Performance Assessment ..................Volcanic Systems .......................
... 1... 2
4
. 4
. . .
. .. 6
... 7
.. 8
. .. 1
. . . 92
... 1
Licensing Support System ...............Waste Solidification Systems ..............Monitored Retrievable Storage .............
2. MAJOR PROBLEMS .
3. FORECAST FOR NEXT PERIOD ................................. 12
4. SUMMARY FINANCIAL STATUS ................................. 13
APPENDIX A: PLANNED AND ACTUAL COSTS, AND COST VARIANCES
ii
LIST OF TABLES
No. Description Page
1 CNWRA CORE STAFF - HIRING PROFILE AND STATUS (10/23/92). 14
2 CNWRA CORE STAFF- CURRENT PROFILE (10/23/92) .15
3 FINANCIAL STATUS .16
ill
CNWRA PROGRAM MANAGER'S PERIODIC REPORTON ACTIVITIES OF THE
CENTER FOR NUCLEAR WASTE REGULATORY ANALYSES
TITLE: Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory AnalysesCONTRACTOR: Southwest Research Institute
6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, Texas
CONTRACT NO: NRC-02-88-005
FIN: D1035-8
NRC CNWRA PROGRAM MANAGER: Malcolm R. Knapp, (301) 504-3324
NRC CNWRA DEPUTY PROGRAM MANAGER: Willard B. Brown, (301) 504-3332
CNWRA PRESIDENT: Wesley C. Patrick, (512) 522-5158
ESTIMATED BUDGET: $89,898,141
PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: 10/26/92 - 10/26/97PERIOD OF THIS REPORT: 09/26/92 - 10/23/92
1. TECHNICAL
1.1 CNWRA Operations
NRC and CNWRA management continued effective coordination meetings and telephonicconferences addressing a range of day-to-day and long-term management topics. Duringthis period, a NRC/CNWRA Operations Plan Meeting was held in Bethesda. TechnicalDirection was received relative to the incorporation of the Staffing and ADP Plans intothe CNWRA Five-Year Plan and the appropriate format for this Plan to satisfy the NRCneeds. Further, discussions continued concerning the most effective use of theCommitment Control Log by both the NRC and the CNWRA. The CNWRA provided'carryover' monies information related to the sustained funding of the existing contract,and discussions were held on the nature and scope of reporting the first five years ofCNWRA spending by FIN.
The current status of CNWRA staffing is indicated in Tables I and 2. Recruitmentefforts and interviewing continued for positions in the Performance Assessment andGeological Setting Elements, including the position of Manager of Geologic Setting.
Moreover, the CNWRA initiated revisions to the Operations Plans for the Division ofHigh-Level Waste Management.
I
Progress continued toward resolving the remaining open Corrective Action Request(CAR) resulting from the FY92 Internal audit with development of a revised softwarecontrol procedure. Completion of the procedure and training is scheduled for October30, 1992, although that date may have to be extended due to extensive revision of thedocument and a change in philosophy as to which organization can best perform theconfiguration management functions for the CNWRA. The working group on thequality, productivity, and format of outgoing CNWRA reports gave three presentationsto CNWRA staff to inform them of the results of their study and solicited input fromCNWRA staff. The working group will present its recommendations to CNWRAManagement during the next reporting period.
1.2 Waste Systems Engineering and Integration
Compliance Determination Strategy (CDS) development continued as input to the LicenseApplication Review Plan (LARP). Development of three example ComplianceDetermination Methods (CDM) also continued. These three examples will be used tofinalize the draft CDM procedure and will be included as input to the LARP.
Development of a procedure to record Uncertainties and their Reduction Methodscontinued.
Efforts continued on the Open Item Tracking System (OITS) and review of PASS/PADBsystem requirements to support revisions in SRA.
Work progressed on a geotechnical decision-making study intended to evaluate decision-making and review processes utilized by the petroleum industry and the EnvironmentalProtection Agency for applicability to the high-level waste program.
Finalization of Regulatory Requirement Topic (RRT) reports continued throughrefinement of RRT structures and rationales and correlation with uncertainties.
Work commenced on the Repository Isolation Criteria (RIC) study which will evaluatepotential regulatory uncertainties in 10 CFR Part 60 related to postclosure functions ofa high-level waste repository.
Planning continued in preparation for the October 29, 1992, technical exchange onapplication of systems engineering techniques to the licensing process. NRC, DOE, NV,and CNWRA will be involved in this exchange.
1.3 External Quality Assurance
During this period, B. Mabrito was part of the NRC Observation Team at the YuccaMountain Project Office audit conducted by the DOE from September 28-October 1,1992. The CNWRA report was completed and sent to NRC for incorporation into theYMPO NRC Observation Audit Report No. 92-17 in a timely manner. Also during thisperiod, R. Brient was on the NRC Observation Team at the U.S. Geological Survey auditconducted by the DOE from October 19-23, 1992. Discussions continued to be heldbetween the NRC EQA Program Element Manager and the CNWRA QA Director to plan
2
future FY93 work, including on-site visits and observations of the DOE audits anticipatedduring the next period. The next NRC Observation Team activity is scheduled for theLos Alamos National Laboratory DOE audit in period 2.
1.4 Geologic Setting
A report titled "Geometric Modeling of Faulting at Yucca Mountain" authored byS. Young, G. Stirewalt, and A. Morris was completed and submitted. This reportsummarizes the work done at CNWRA over a period of one year on geometric cross-sectional models of Yucca Mountain.
Task 3 activities continued on computational analyses to evaluate the technical basis forthe GWIF subsystem performance requirement of 10 CFR Part 60 during the reportingperiod. Three of these analyses have been documented and submitted to NRC. A fourthanalysis is nearing completion. New analyses will be planned after completing a reviewof the report on this subject by J. Pohle.
Work on establishing the expert committee on Fault Displacement and Seismic Hazardis continuing. The CNWRA COI committee found Dr. Anne S. Kiremidjian of StanfordUniversity to be free of COI, while Jack R. Banjamin & Associates, with which Dr.McCann is affiliated, was determined to be free from organizational COI. A request toNRC to exempt Dr. George A. Thompson, Professor of Geophysics at the StanfordUniversity, from COI consideration was made based on the fact that, while Dr.Thompson has consulted with the DOE, such work did not pertain to the Yucca MountainProject. Paperwork from Dr. Cornell was received and is in the process of being clearedthrough the COI Committee.
R. B. Hofmann determined SEISM I Code coefficients for Campbell's ground-motionattenuation functions to be applied to Yucca Mountain analyses.
M. Miklas participated in an ACNW workshop in Las Vegas on natural resources asrelated to potential human intrusion. He presented parts of his recently completed reporton that subject.
Work on structural interpretation of reflection seismic line AV-1 was completed anddocumented. The report is currently under internal review at the CNWRA.
In cooperation with the NRC staff, planning for developing Compliance DeterminationStrategies for Regulatory Topics associated with the GS Element was completed duringthis period. Planning included assignment of CNWRA and NRC staff to each CDS topicand a tentative schedule for completion. All of the CNWRA's geochemists who willtravel to the NRC offices for a RES meeting will spend an extra day to discuss thegeochemistry CDSs as a group.
G. Stirewalt and P. LaPlante completed the report on regulatory history and intent inrelation to volcanism. The report was submitted to the NRC on September 30, 1992.
3
1.5 Engineered Barrier Systems
Meetings were held with NRC staff to scope the various Compliance DeterminationStrategies for the Regulatory Requirement Topics assigned to the EBS Program Element.Preliminary leads for the CDSs at both the NRC and CNWRA have been identified.
Work continued on model development for the "substantially complete containment"example problem. As part of a generalized model for various corrosion processes,equations were developed for cathodic reaction with oxygen. A methodology wasdeveloped for representing waste package environment, including wetting of containersand chemistry of water in contact with waste containers. The analytical solutions to beused in the example problem for waste package temperatures were checked and verified.A potential peer reviewed journal paper on a crevice corrosion model is underpreparation.
A letter report on the Preliminary Assessment of Pitting Corrosion Models wascompleted and submitted to the NRC. This completed the requirements of IntermediateMilestone 20-3702-013-305 in the EBSPAC program. Improvements were made to thesolver in the MARIANA code. The new solver improves the efficiency of thecomputations in the corrosion models. Support to IPA and SOTEC continued this periodto ensure the integration of the various related modelling efforts.
Two technical papers, one for the Materials Research Society conference and the otherfor the National Association of Corrosion Engineers conference, were completed.Reviews of these papers are underway.
P. Nair and J. Walton attended the Full Board Meeting of the Nuclear Waste TechnicalReview Board, at Las Vegas, on October 14-15, 1992. At the meeting, the source termdevelopments of various organization were discussed.
1.6 Repository Design, Construction, and Operations
The final version of CDS on Shafts and Ramps Design RRT was submitted to NRC onOctober 6, 1992. Planning activities for the other 27 RRTs relevant to RDCO wereconducted and the development of CDS for several RRTs were initiated during thisperiod. Development of the CDM on Shafts and Ramps Design continued.
A. Chowdhury attended a meeting in Salt Lake City on October 20, 1992, for reviewingthe papers for 1993 International High-Level Radioactive Waste Management Conferenceto be held in Las Vegas in April 1993. He is the organizer of the Natural Systemssession on "Site Data Collection and Analyses."
Planning for prelicensing activities and compliance determination coupled code selectionactivities continued during this period.
1.7 Performance Assessment
During this reporting period, work on the Total Performance System (TPA) code and the
4
Iterative Performance Assessment (IPA) Phase 2 analysis continued to be the high priorityactivities. Incorporation of the new scenario and modified consequence modules in theTPA code was completed. A series of functional tests was performed to debug moduleinterfacing. The first successful execution of the entire system code was performed.
A presentation was given at the CNWRA entitled "The Quality of Experts' ProbabilitiesObtained Through Formal Elicitation Techniques." The speaker, Dr. Steve Hora of theUniversity of Hawaii, described expert elicitation techniques and summarized the resultsof a recent study that surveyed applications of these techniques in various fields. His talkwas very well received by the staff and stimulated much spirited discussion regarding thepossible use of these techniques in the repository licensing process.
The revision of the configuration management and software QA procedure, TOP-018,was completed. Implementation of this procedure is expected to be initiated in lateDecember or early January. The procedure will apply to all the scientific andengineering codes used at the CNWRA.
Three PA CDSs were completed and submitted to the NRC. The three CDSs includedthe Containment, Individual Protection and Groundwater Protection requirements.
A. Bagztoglou is serving as the organizer of a Topical Session entitled: "Treatment ofSpatial Variability in Probabilistic Safety Assessments", to be held in Santa Fe, NewMexico during the 14th Probabilistic Safety Assessment Group (PSAG) meeting.Tentative speakers include: A. Zimmerman, S. Neuman, A. Tompson, R. McKay,G. de Marsily, P. Grindrod, N. Kjellbert, and A. Bagtzoglou. The meeting, hosted bySandia National Laboratory, is to be held under the auspices of OECD/NEA and willprovide an exciting forum for people involved in Stochastic and Geostatistical methods.
1.8 Research
Research Project I - Overall Research
Laboratory experimentation continued in Building 57 and in other SwRI facilities on sixCNWRA research projects. Scopes of Work for two new research projects are expectedto be received from the NRC.
Arrangements for the Third INTRAVAL Phase 2 Workshop were completed. Theworkshop will be held at the La Mansion del Rio Hotel in San Antonio from November9-13, 1992. The workshop has international participation with presentations ongeohydrologic modelling from the various programs. Several CNWRA and NRCtechnical staff are expected to attend.
Preparations continued for the Symposium on the Scientific Basis for Nuclear WasteManagement XVI to be held in Boston, November 30 - December 4, 1992. Several draftmanuscripts have been received and are being sent out by respective session chairs forpeer review.
5
Research Project 2 - Geochemistry
Experiments at 250C to study the solubility of analcime and clinoptilolite and phaseequilibrium between analcime+clinoptilolite+aqueous-solution continued. No aqueoussamples were taken during this period. Experiments on ion exchange at 25 0C betweenNa-clinoptilolite and aqueous solutions of Sr at 0.005, 0.05, and 0.5 N were initiated.'Sr was used as tracer and will be measured using a liquid scintillation analyzer.
Version 7.1 of the EQ3/6 software and data package from Lawrence Livermore NationalLaboratory was enabled on the SwRI VAX computer with minor modifications. Testingof the codes and data was initiated focusing on near-field vaporization and mineral-solution reactions at deviated temperatures.
Research Project 3 - Thermohydrology
Construction of Test 10 is near completion. The test container has been constructed andfilled with alternating vertically-oriented bands of relatively fine- and coarse-grainedalumina.
Test 8, a 2-D experiment examining a point heat source proximal to a simulated fracture,and Test 12, a more heavily instrumented repeat of Test 6, are continuing.
Letters in response to the Peer Review Team comments were drafted and sent to the PeerReview Team members. These letters delineate the RES project staff's responses toconcerns raised by the Peer Review Team. Indicated in the letters are whether theresponses were incorporated into the research project summary report or the justificationwhy the changes were not incorporated.
Laboratory measurement of the hydraulic characteristics of the different test media hascontinued. These tests include measurement of the drainage portion of the moisturecharacteristic curve, and of both the drainage and imbibition curves of the moisturecharacteristic curve.
Research Project 4 - Seismic Rock Mechanics
Seismic shear testing of a single joint rock specimen was conducted during this periodusing the higher capacity hydraulic actuator. Data are being analyzed in the context ofCoulomb, Barton-Bandis, and Continuously Yielding rock joint models. The single jointrock specimens under pseudostatic and dynamic loads are being analyzed using the two-dimensional distinct element code UDEC. Significant problems exist in the UDECcomputer code which are affecting the rate of progress of this activity.
The field data collection from the Lucky Friday Mine, Mullan, Idaho, continued, and themechanical, hydraulic, and seismic data are being analyzed. Negotiation is ongoing withthe Lucky Friday Mine authority to continue the field study there beyond September 30,1992. A paper "Effects of Mining-Induced Seismic Events on a Deep UndergroundMine" was submitted prior to peer review for publication in a special issue of The
6
Journal of Pure and Applied Geophysics.
The design of experiment activities for small scale modeling of jointed rock masscontinued during this period. A. Chowdhury attended a meeting in Salt Lake City onOctober 20, 1992, for reviewing the papers for 1993 International High-LevelRadioactive Waste Management Conference to be held in Las Vegas in April 1993. Heis the organizer of the Natural Systems session on "Site Data Collection and Analyses."
Research Project S - Integrated Waste Package Experiments
Crevice cell chemistry experiments in Task I continued this reporting period. Theseexperiments measure the changes in the pH, chloride concentration, and potential atvarious points in the crevice (using microelectrodes) as a function of externally appliedpotential and compare such changes to model predictions. The experiments on type 304Lstainless steel in 1000 ppm chloride solution at room temperature have shown that the pHin the crevice can decrease to 3 and the chloride concentration can increase to about50,000 ppm upon application of an external potential of 300 mV vs. SCE. The changein pH was quite rapid, but attained a steady state value of about 3. Upon reversing theexternal potential, the change in chloride concentration back to bulk levels (1000 ppm)was quite rapid, but no significant reversal of pH was observed. However, the currentresponded almost instantaneously to changes in potential. The implications of thisobservation on modeling repassivation potential are being examined. Experiments onalloy 825 are currently underway and will determine if these observations are peculiarto type 304L stainless steel. The experiments are being conducted at room temperaturesdue to the limitations of the microelectrodes being used. Techniques for highertemperature measurements will be explored.
The effect of surface Cr-depletion on localized corrosion of alloy 825 was examinedbriefly using cyclic polarization technique. It was found that mill-finish surface (whichshowed Cr-depletion in earlier analyses) had a large affect on the behavior of the alloy.Tests in the 6 ppm and 1000 ppm chloride solutions indicated that only the mill-finishsurfaces corroded and no corrosion was observed on ground surfaces where the Cr-depleted layer was removed. However, it appears at this time that the Cr-depletedsurface mostly results in a large component of general corrosion, possibly because of thelow Cr concentration. A computer search of the literature on the effects of welding onthe corrosion resistance of Ni-base alloys has been completed.
Slow strain tests of type 316L stainless steel continued after the installation of newLVDTs. Two tests were conducted on tensile specimens at a strain rate of 1x10-6 /sec insolutions containing 1000 ppm chloride at 950C. The pH of these solutions was adjustedby bubbling CO2. Ductile failure was observed in the specimen tested at 0.0 V vs. SCE,whereas the specimen tested at 0.1 V vs. SCE exhibited a reduced elongation to failureprobably due the effect of pitting corrosion, which was evident on the specimen lateralsurface at low magnification . No evidence of transgranular cracking was found on thefracture surface at low magnification. Experiments will continue on type 316L SS toidentify potential ranges for SCC before initiation of testing on alloy 825.
Metallographic examination of heat treated and tested specimens of alloy 825 has
7
continued and will be completed soon to be included in the report on thermal stability andsensitization which is under preparation.
A description of the scope of the proposed review on microbiologically influencedcorrosion was sent to a potential consultant for this Task, Dr. Gill Geesey at theCNWRA for Interfacial Microbial Process Engineering at Montana State University.
Mr. Darrell Dunn, MS in Material Science and Engineering from the University ofArizona, joined the CNWRA staff to support the activities in the IWPE program.
Research Project 6 - Stochastic Analysis of Large-Scale Flow and Transport inUnsaturated Fractured Rock
The task on documenting the BIGFLOW computer code and its auxiliary processingmodule, DATAFLOW, is near completion. Work during this period involved: (i) thepresentation of the mathematical basis of the code. (ii) numerical verification and testingof the code, and (iii) preparation of a reference and user's manual. The difficulties withanalytical benchmarks, especially in the case of strip infiltration source, have beenresolved. However, several code-to-code comparisons have been conducted with veryencouraging results. BIGFLOW was benchmarked against CMVSFS (massively parallelcode) and PORFLOW for various test cases. Preparation of the code reference anduser's guide is almost complete. It is expected that the benchmark tests developed forthis code can be replicated in the future for other codes utilized in NRC's HLW program.
GLFRACT3D, an interactive computer graphics code for processing and visualization of3-D fracture networks, was enhanced so that fractures of arbitrary orientation can beprocessed. Work on coupling the current version of the code with a pre-processor thatwill stochastically generate fracture planes was initiated. It is envisioned that data fromthe Apache Leap Site will be incorporated in order to generate fracture plane realizations.Thus, the GLFRACT3D code will serve as a unique visualization tool for conceptualizingthe inherent heterogeneity and complexity of the data.
Work on a numerical investigation of effective hydraulic conductivity, under randomfracturing conditions, has begun. The principal investigator is currently formulating thetest problem, and is involved in discussions with Professor J. Yeh (University ofArizona) in order to conduct a numerical experiment/comparison using BIGFLOW andan independently developed code.
Research Project 7 - Geochemical Analogs
Development of quantitative topographic models of the existing and pre-mining surfacesat the Nopal I deposit at Peha Blanca, Mexico, continued with high resolution imagingof the immediate area of the deposit. An oblique photographic image of the clearedportion of the Level + 10 surface was rotated by computer techniques to provide anapproximation of a perpendicular view of the surface for comparison with alteration,fracture, and uranium distribution mapping, and to guide future sampling of the surface.
Samples of euhedral "vapor phase" quartz from Level +20 of the Nopal I deposit were
8
prepared for fluid inclusion microthermometry; identification of primary and secondaryinclusions and microthermometric measurements were begun on those samples. Initialanalyses of samples from the Akrotiri analog site for leachable trace metals (Cu, Fe andMn) were completed. Uranium-series analyses of samples from Pefia Blanca continued.Petrographic analyses of samples from the Level + 10 m surface of the Nopal I depositcontinued with transmitted and reflected optical microscopy, x-ray diffractometry (XRD),scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and energy dispersive x-ray spectrometry (EDS)analyses of minerals and minerals textures.
Dr. Clairy Palyvou of the Greek Archaeological Service visited the CNWRA laboratorieson October 16, 1992. Informal presentations were made for her on the mission of theCNWRA and the ongoing research within the Analog Project. Discussions focused onexcavation of metallic artifacts during the most recent dig at Akrotiri which may be ofsignificance for analog study.
A presentation was made of Natural Analog Research Project results at the CEC NaturalAnalog Working Group Meeting in Toledo. Spain, in addition to participation in thedeliberations of the Working Group. A paper entitled "Performance assessmentsignificance of natural analog studies at Pefia Blanca, Mexico, and at Santorini, Greece"(written for the conference proceedings) was revised in response to internal reviewcomments.
Research Project 9 - Sorption Modeling
Experiments to study uranium sorption on clinoptilolite as a function of pH and totaluranium concentration continued. The kinetics experiments have been completed, andsamples are being processed for analysis using alpha-spectrometry. Samples from theforward equilibrium sorption experiments were taken, and procedures for conducting thereverse experiments are being prepared.
Preparation of montmorillonite specimens to be used for sorption experiments continued,and kinetics experiments will be initiated next reporting period.
Strontium data from the EQ3/6 database was added to the MINTEQA2 radionuclidedatabase. FITEQL runs continued to extract the parameters necessary for comparisonof the constant capacitance, diffuse-layer. and triple-layer surface complexation models.The data of Tripathi (1984) for U(VI)-sorption on goethite in both CO2 -free andatmospheric CO2 systems were used as a basis for comparison. Most of the modelparameters were externally fixed to minimize the amount of curve fitting necessary.MINTEQA2 was used to model the data assuming a single mononuclear UO2 (OH) 2
-n
surface complex. In general, anionic complexes provided the best fit to the data, whichis reasonable since the sorption edge falls in a narrow pH range (5-7) below the point ofzero charge (pHzc - 7.5) of goethite. The triple-layer model provided the best fit tosuch data, but the much simpler diffuse-layer model was able to reproduce the basicfeatures of the sorption-pH curves. This may be significant for performance assessmentapplications where simpler models are favored to minimize the necessary computationalrequirements.
9
Research Project 10 - Performance Assessment
During this period, work in the PA Research Project has been concentrated in Task 1 onConceptual Model Development and Task 2 on Computational Model Development.Within Task 1, a team has been assembled to study how models of the four major classesof disruptive scenarios can be improved and be incorporated into the IPA effort. WithinTask 2, work has continued on the development of adaptive gridding algorithms for finiteelements models of flow and transport.
A planning meeting was convened by R. Manteufel on October 15, 1992, to discuss workplanned under Task 1: Conceptual Model Development, Subtask: Disruptive Scenarios.Those in attendance were: M. Miklas, B. Hill, R. Hofmann, G. Stirewalt (by phone),H. Manaktala, and R. Manteufel. The first meeting summarized the structure of theproposed work emphasizing how this work needs to feed into IPA (i.e., the NMSSwork). Key people were identified to work in each area. In addition a lead person wasdesignated for each area (except seismo-tectonics, which was to be decided). In the areaof seismo-tectonic events, the participants are: R. Hofmann, S. Young, and G. Stirewalt.In the area of volcanic (magmatic intrusion) events, the participants are: B. Hill (lead),S. Young, G. Stirewalt, and C. Conner. In the area of climatic changes, the participantsare: M. Miklas (lead), and A. Dewispelare. In the are of human intrusion (bothdeliberate and inadvertent), the participants are: Mike Miklas (lead), H. Manaktala, andD. Turner. Action items included (i) selecting a lead person for seismo-tectonics amongR. Hofmann, S. Young, and G. Stirewalt, (ii) drafting a 1-2 page overview of the scopeand objectives of this work by R. Manteufel, and (iii) scheduling the next meeting forOctober 29, 1992.
Work within Task 2 on Computational Model Development has addressed the feasibilityof developing efficient flow and transport models which use adaptive griddingprocedures. In conjunction with work initiated on the Yucca Mountain test case for theINTRAVAL project, G. Wittmeyer has continued developmental work on a ID adaptive,finite element model for unsaturated flow in fractured rock. This program employs thecomposite fracture-matrix continuum model developed by Klavetter and Peters to describethe unsaturated hydraulic properties of the rock. The adaptive gridding procedure usesa simple truncation error estimator for linear shape functions to determine those elementswhich need to be further subdivided. The truncation error estimation procedure has beenimplemented and appears to accurately identify those portions of the solution domainwhere pressure head is changing most rapidly and thus in need of further spatialrefinement.
Two grid refinement algorithms have been developed which use the truncation errorestimate to identify portions of the computational grid requiring greater spatial resolution.In the first algorithm, a monotonic grading function is constructed by integrating the griderror function with respect to spatial location. This grading function is then used to mapa set of equally spaced grid points to a set whose spacing reflects the variation in thegrading function; more points being located in zones with large relative errors and fewerin those zones with small relative errors. This first algorithm has been tested for asimple ID infiltration problem and while it does refine the region near the wetting front,
10
the algorithm does not, at present, preserve any of the nodal points ahead of the wettingfront.
The second algorithm initially sorts the spatial truncation error estimates by theirdeviation from the mean error and then subdivides or combines elements accordingly.The rules for refinement or coarsening are as follow: (i) if the error is less than the meanerror, combine with an adjacent element if it too is less than the mean error, (ii) if theerror is between 0 and I standard deviation above the mean error, subdivide the elementinto 2 equal-sized elements, (iii) if the error is between 2 and 3 standard deviationsgreater than the mean error, subdivide the element into 4 equal-sized elements, and (iv)if the error is greater than 3 standard deviations above the mean error, subdivide theelement into 8 equal-sized elements. This refinement algorithm has also been tested ona simple D infiltration problem but with considerably greater success than the firstrefinement algorithm. Although the refinement strategy is admittedly ad hoc, it appearsto correctly concentrate the grid nodes near the wetting front and coarsen the grid bothin front of and behind the wetting front, and thereby distribute the spatial discretizationerror more uniformly.
Research Project 11 - Volcanic Systems
The major deliverable for Task I of the Volcanism Research Project, the literature surveyreport, was submitted to the NRC on September 30, 1992. The report recommended aregion, comprised by the north-northwest trending Mojave-Death Valley-Sierra Nevada-Central Nevada tectonomagmatic corridor, for concentrating efforts on data compilation(Task 2 of the Research Project). This corridor is characterized by data on Quaternaryvolcanism and faulting, and contemporary strain. Data from this corridor will be usedfor analyses of spatial and temporal patterns of volcanism. In addition, the reportrecommended compilation of data from large basaltic fields at the margin of the ColoradoPlateau for analysis of volcanic processes. The Task 2 data compilation effort wasinitiated on October 1, 1992.
1.9 Licensing Support System
All work on Task has been completed. The CNWRA discussed the comments on thelast report submitted to the LSSA under Task 2. Several questions were answered on thephone and will be documented in the final report. The remaining work to be done onTask 2 was discussed and the Operations Plan will be changed to reflect the revision.
1.10 Waste Solidification Systems
As part of Task 3, Seismic Analysis of the Vitrification Facility activities, a letter reporton the available documents was prepared and submitted to the NRC. This submittalcompleted the requirements of the Intermediate Milestone 20-3706-003-050. Additionaldocuments were received from the DOE on seismic and tornado analysis of thevitrification facility this period. The FY93-94 Operations Plan for the WSS Element wasapproved with comments by the NRC. The modifications to the Operations Plan will besubmitted to the NRC as change pages.
I1I
1.11 Monitored Retrievable Storage
The review of the August 31, 1992, version of DOE's MRS Annotated Outline wascompleted during this period. Review comments were submitted to NRC on October 13,1992, as MRS Intermediate Milestone No. 20-5707-003-020-001.
2. MAJOR PROBLEMS
None.
3. FORECAST FOR NEXT PERIOD
Work will begin pursuant to the modifications to the FY93-94 Operations Plans and ProjectPlans. Preparations for the delivery of a letter report on the CNWRA's Five-Year Plan willbegin. The reporting of costs relative to the first five years of CNWRA operations will be madetwo weeks after the close of Period 3. Recruitment and interviews remain on schedule, andemployment agreements for anticipated additions to the CNWRA core staff will be finalized.CNWRA management staff will pursue coordination with cognizant NRC staff for the conductof the Mid-Year Review Meeting.
Resolution continues on the last of the three Corrective Action Requests resulting from theCNWRA's Internal audit. There has been substantial work on the revision of the TechnicalOperating Procedure entitled Software Configuration Management of Scientific and EngineeringComputer Codes and it must go through CNWRA reviews with complete resolution of comments.Following distribution of the procedure, implementation would start with training to that TOP.Maintenance and implementation of the current CNWRA QA Manual and Operating Procedureswill continue.
Talks with cognizant NRC staff relative to the CNWRA's continued participation inimplementation of the DHLWM Computer System will resume.
All technical elements will continue development of Compliance Determination Strategies.
Revisions in requirements for SRA system support will continue to be identified. Work willcontinue on the Open Item Tracking System (OITS) to support implementation of the prototypesystem.
The CNWRA Director of Quality Assurance will continue to plan and coordinate upcoming NRCaudit observation team work and other External QA activities with the NRC EQA ProgramElement Manager. CNWRA work will continue in the External QA Task 1 and will include theNRC directed work to observe the DOE audit of Los Alamos National Laboratory next period.
The Geologic Setting Element activities will continue to focus on technical assistance in thepotential regulatory guidance on GWTT, seismic hazard analysis, tectonics, volcanology, andgeochemistry including assistance in the review and evaluation of key draft reports submitted inthese areas. Staff will support joint NRC/CNWRA work on the SRA and will participate intechnical exchange meetings, as requested.
12
The report on structural interpretation of reflection seismic line AV-1 will be completed andsubmitted. M. Miklas and B. Sagar will attend the ACNW Working Group Meeting onNovember 18, 1992 in Bethesda, Maryland.
The EBS Element will continue work on the CDS on Releases from the EBS. The report, "AnAssessment of Borosilicate Glass as a High Level Waste Form" CNWRA 92-017, the report onthe selection of models for the "substantially complete containment" example problem, and thewhite paper on waste form issues will be completed.
Activities within the RDCO Element will include: (i) development of the CDM for the RR onShafts and Ramps, (ii) development of CDSs for several RRTs relevant to RDCO, (iii) initiationof code selection/code development, (iv) coordination of DBE rulemaking, and (v) participationin prelicensing activities.
The PA Element will direct effort in five major areas: (i) completion of the IPA Phase 2production runs and documentation of TPA analysis, (ii) revision of OPS and Project Plans, (iii)attendance at the ACNW and DOE meetings on expert judgment techniques, (iv) planning forIPA Phase 3, and (v) preparation for forthcoming meetings with the ACNW and DOE on totalsystem performance assessment.
Seismic Rock Mechanics research activities during Period 2 of FY93 will include continuationof shear testing of single joint rock specimens, initiation of small scale rock mass physicalmodeling, field data collection from Lucky Friday Mine, numerical modeling of single joint testspecimens, and DECOVALEX Phase II coupled modeling.
Within the LSSA Element, the CNWRA will continue Task 2 work related to the report"Feasibility of Priority Loading Schedule for LSS Documents."
As part of the WSS Element activities, the review of the seismic analysis of the vitrificationfacility and the corrosion evaluation of waste tanks will continue. A status report on the availableDOE information related to seismic analysis of the vitrification facility will be prepared.
The MRS Tasks 1, 2, and 3 have been funded for FY93 but no work assignment has beenreceived from NRC for the following period.
4. SUIEVIARY FINANCIAL STATUS
Table 3 indicates the financial status of the CNWRA in the context of "authorized" fundsestablished by the NRC. Appendix A displays planned and actual costs to date, withoutallowance for fee, on both a per period and a cumulative basis. In addition, these data do notinclude commitments, and variances are shown on both a dollar and percentage basis. Totalcommitments of the CNWRA are $117,341. Pertinent information is provided for the CNWRAprogram as a whole, the Division of High-Level Waste Management (HLW) FIN, and the Officeof Nuclear Regulatory Research Division of Regulatory Applications FIN, as well as for eachProgram Element and Project. This information is provided in both graphical and tabular form.Since this is the first period of the fiscal year, no trends in cost variance have yet developedwhich warrant discussion.
13
TABLE 1. CNWRA CORE STAFF - HIRING PROFILE AND STATUS (10/23/92)
FISCAL YEAR ! OPENEXPERTISE/EXPERIENCE FY92 FY93! FY94 FY95: FY96 FY97 TOTAL: THIS
lQ!2Qi3Q 40' .REQ'D QTR
ADMINISTRATION 5 5 5; 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0CODE ANALYST (g) :1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 -1DATA BASE MANAGEMENT AND DATA PROCESS. 2 2 2 .2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ; 0ELECTROCHEMISTRY 11 1 11 1 1 . 1 1 0ENGINEERING GEOLOGY/GEOLOGICAL ENGNG , 1 1 '1 1 1 0ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES 11 1 1 1 : 1 1 0GEOCHEMISTRY t555 5i 5 5 5 5 5 5 50GEOHYDROLOGY/HYDROGEOLOGY (a) (b) (d) 4 44 4 5 5 5 5 5 0GEOLOGY ( (d) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1
.HEALTH PHYSICS :1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS :2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0MATERIAL SCIENCES 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 0MECHANICAL, INCLUDING DESIGN & FABRICATION , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0MINING ENGINEERING 111.1 1 1 1 1 1 0NUCLEAR ENGINEERING 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0NUMERICAL MODELING/ANALYSIS 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT 3 3 4 4 4 . 4 4 4 4 4 0
:QUALITY ASSURANCE 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0RADIOISOTOPE GEOCHEMISTRY 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0REGULATORY ANALYSIS 1 .111 1 1 . 1 1 1 0ROCK MECHANICS 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 0SEISMOLOGY 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0SPENT FUEL DEGRAD./SOURCE-TERM ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 0STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY/SEISMO-TECTONICS (d) f 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 : 3 0SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (f) (b) I 2 2 2 2 2 , 2 2 2 2 2 1VOLCANOLOGY/IGNEOUS PROCESSES 1 1 1 1 1 1 -1
TOTAL REQUIRED '44 ;46 47 47 51 54 54 54 54 54 0
(a) Interview scheduled next period.(b) Resumes being solicited.(c) Offer made.(d) Offer pending.(e) Offer accepted.(f) Position re-opened.(g) Negative number indicates early hire.
Staffing Summary
CurrentOffers MadePlanned This DatePlanned End of FY92
Professional490
4851
Support150
1516
Total640
6367
14
TABLE 2. CNWRA CORE STAFF - CURRENT PROFILE (10/23/92)
EXPERTISE/EXPERIENCE
ADMINISTRATION iJ. Latz, W. Patrick, H. Garcia, P. Mackin, J. Russell|CODE ANALYST I R. Janetzke, R. MartinDATA BASE MANAGEMENT AND DATA PROCESS. IA. Johnson, S. McFaddinELECTROCHEMISTRY i G. CragnolinoENGINEERING GEOLOGY/GEOLOGICAL ENGNG IENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES iP. LaPlanteGEOCHEMISTRY 1W. Murphy, R. Pabalan, E. Pearcy, J. Prikryl, D. TurnerGEOHYDROLOGY/HYDROGEOLOGY IA. Bagtzoglou, R. Green, G. Wittmeyer, P. Lichtner (1 1/1 5)GEOLOGY M. MiklasHEALTH PHYSICS jJ. HagemanINFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS R. Johnson, R. Marshall
!MATERIAL SCIENCES P. Nair, H. Manaktala, N. Sridhar, D. DunnI MECHANICAL, INCLUDING DESIGN & FABRICATION C. TschoepeMINING ENGINEERING S-M. Hsiung
!NUCLEAR ENGINEERING H. Karimi;NUMERICAL MODELING/ANALYSIS J. WaltonPERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT I B. Sagar, R. Baca, B. Gureghian, R. Manteufel
i QUALITY ASSURANCE | B. Mabrito, R. Brient'RADIOISOTOPE GEOCHEMISTRY B. LeslieREGULATORY ANALYSIS IS. Spector (Law)ROCK MECHANICS i A. Chowdhury, M. Ahola, A. GhoshSEISMOLOGY I R. HofmannSPENT FUEL DEGRAD./SOURCE-TERM ._ISTRUCTURAL GEOLOGY/SEISMO-TECTONICS !G. Stirewalt, S. YoungSYSTEMS ENGINEERING A. DeWispelareVOLCANOLOGY/IGNEOUS PROCESSES IC. Connor (1 1/3)*-
- Regular limited-term employee
15
TABLE 3. FINANCIAL STATUS
FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDSAUTHORIZED' COSTED TO UNCOSTED COMMITMENTS AUTHORIZED" COSTED TO UNCOSTED COMMITMENT
DATE' DATE"
GS 1,431,005 1,007,614 423,391 4,777 GS 228,669 28,941 199,728 0
EBS 645,855 598,732 47,123 1,390 EBS 164,378 17,280 147,098 300
RDCO 955,653 887,092 68,561 37,539 RDCO 160,330 19,395 140,935 1,150
WSEI 1,507,070 1,039,165 467,905 5,187 WSEI 282,679 23,613 259,066 1,000
EQA 203,312 111,110 92,202 0 EQA 26,127 5,681 20,446 1,200
PA 1,190,514 1,073,567 116,947 1,405 PA 249,639 22,600 227,039 50
COPS 2,392,067 2,302,984 89,083 6,435 COPS 400,098 52,661 347,437 3,700
HLW 8,325,476 7,020,264 1,305,212 56,733 HLW 1,511,920 170,171 1,341,749 7,400
OVERALL 269,240 206,185 63,055 3,207 OVERALL 42,491 4,848 37,643 0
GEOCHEM 249,000 215,310 33,690 70 GEOCHEM 58,355 4,408 53,947 32
THERMO 328,845 386,046 (57,201) 1,587 THERMO 68,923 8,790 60,133 0
SEISMIC 399,122 374,955 24,167 24,921 SEISMIC 100,354 5,057 95,297 0
IWPE 517,215 455,821 61,394 953 IWPE 103,506 9,303 94.203 0
STOCH 210,731 228,306 (17,575) 7,162 STOCH 52,760 4,544 48,216 0
ANALOGS 367,460 390,291 (22,831) 9,304 ANALOGS 77,880 5,095 72,785 0
SORPTION 400,691 355,935 44,756 3,625 SORPTION 89,892 10,132 79,760 606
RES PA 484,622 335,012 149,610 250 RES PA 152,395 5,787 146,608 0
VOLCAN 334,468 355,889 (21,421) 1,250 VOLCAN 48,708 11,983 36,725 0
RES 3,745,330 3,303,750 441,580 52,329 RES 795,264 69,947 725,317 638
LSSA 244,264 269,799 (25,535) 241 LSSA 23,000 0 23,000 0
WSS 206,654 88,977 117,677 0 WSS 43,360 891 42,469 0
MRS 20,000 40,034 (20,034) 0 MRS 46,000 188 45,812 0
TOTAL 12,541,724 10,722,824 1,818,900 109,303 TOTAL 2,419,544 241,197 2,178,347 8,038
FY92 + FY93 through October 14, 1992 (First-Five Year Period of Contract) * FY93 beginning October 15, 1992 (Second Five Year Period of Contract).
APPENDIX A -- PLANNED AND ACTUAL COSTS, AND COST VARIANCES
5700-000 Center Composite16000000 -T-
14000000-
12000000-
10000000-
8000000 -
Estimates-- E---
Actuals
-ja-0
(
_e-,
6000000-
4000000 -
2000000II
. _ ,,- -~ - -
0 T - - I - --- - -- - - --- -- - - r r - -- --- --- ---I ------------- -
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 12 13
Fiscal Period
(
Fiscal Period 1._ _
Est. Period CostAct. Period CostVariance, $Variance, %Est FY-CumulAct. FY CumulPercent CompleteVariance, $Variance, %
1104946793641311305
28.21104946793641
5.5311305
2 3 __ 4 5 6 71214930 1208746 1215389 1082298 1013880 1194713
0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
8 __ 9 10 11 12 -- 13 -
1095567 1110035 1136880 1064689 1069275 9697580 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0
0.0- - - 0.0 00- '- _OO- 0.0 0.0 0.0
TOTAL1104946793641311305
28.22319876 3528/
00.0
0
622 4744011 5826309 6840189 80349020 0 0 0 0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0 0 0 0
91304690
0.00
102405040
0.00
11377384 124420730 0
0.0 0.00 0
135113480
0.00
144811060
0.00
28.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
5702 HLW10000000--
8000000-
6000000 --
4000000 --
2000000 -
Estimates
Actuals
I
�-0
(
1l
01-- - 2 3 - 4
1 2 3 4
~~~T ~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Th. ---- T -- -
5 6 7
Fiscal Period8 9 10 11 12 13
Fiscal Period _ 1 --Est. Period Cost 665495
2 3 4 5 __ 6 _
Act. Period CostVariance, $Variance, %Est. FY CumulAct. FY CumulPercent CompleteVariance, $Variance, %
513735151760
22.8665495-- i513735
736173 7350270 00 0
0.0 0.01401668 2136695
0 0
658829 602373 58990 00 0
0.0 0.02885868 3555825 41606
0 00.0 0.0
0 00.0 00 C
720
7 8 9 10 11605849 629639 607679 589829 540071
0 0 0 0 0517200 465193
12 13 TOTAL
0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
00O 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.025 4891421 5552906 6214465 6887707 7516615 8153130 87102520 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.0- - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
665495513735151760
22.8
5.9 0.0 0.0151760 0 0
22.8 0.0 0.0
5704 RES6000000 -
5000000-
4000000-
3000000 -
2000000-
1000000-
Estimates- a
Actuals-0
(
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0~-C
l
-- ky--
0 I l l I -1- ----- ----- T . F X I
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Fiscal Period
(
r . And .
Fiscal PeriodEst. Period CostAct. Period CostVariance, $Variance, %Est. FY CumulAct. FY CumulPercent CompleteVariance, $Variance, %
3E2413~
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1332802 414665 402664 406561 374369 370206 423573 380544 395042 409827 386735 373530 35124647110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 015692 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 035.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
32802 797467 1200131 1606692 1981061 2351267 2774840 3155384 3550426 3960253 4346988 4720518 507176447110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.015692 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3E24
12:
TOTAL382802247110135692
35.4
35.4 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 00 00 0.0
5702-000 GS1600000 - -
1400000
1200000
1000000
800000-
600000-
400000-
200000
--- -k ----
__O
(.�41
o t - ........-- -T-r- - - I ~-- -- - r--- - - --- --- - -r---- r--- - -- ---- -F- I1 - -- - -I
0 l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Fiscal Period
Fiscal Period_st. Peiod Cost
Act. Period CostVariance, $Variance, %
1 i _ _ 2 - - 5 7 8 9_10 _ 10 _11
102i63 108983 114823 126032 108559 104291 146905 105385 107624 126885 11389096253 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 033443 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 00 00 0.0
_i- 12 -- 1-3 __109938 99959
0 00 0
0.0 0.0_ _ __ __
TOTAL102463962536210
__61_ _
Est. FY CumuiAct. FY CumutPercent CompleteVariance, $Variance, %
10246396253
6.56210
6.1
211 446 326269 452301 560860 665151 812056 9174410 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
10250650
0.00
0.0
11519500
0.00
0.0
12658400
0.00
0.0
13757780
0.00
14757370
0.00
0.0 0.0
5702-01 0 EBS---------
700000-
600000
500000
400000-
300 000 --
200000-
100000-
0
Estimates
Actuals
(&-O
(1)
I-0-
- - -
0T -- - - I 1-F - - - - r - - -I - , -I - - - - - I
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3
Fiscal Period
(
Fisc al Period 12 - 34 -- 6 7 8 9 10 __ 11 12 _ 13Est. Peio Cost 718 029 405 76602 661965 4784 75944 62633440 37 86 02 16Act. Period Cost 49944 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Variance, $ 21184 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Variance, % 29.8 0.0 -- 0.0 .....- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 __ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 _ _0.0 0.0Est. FY Cumul 71128 151657 236462-313064 379259 427113 503057 565690- -610496 648 6533 673658 695127-Act. FY Cumul 49944 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Percent Complete 7.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Variance, $ 21184 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Variance, % 29.8 _ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 __0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 _ 0.0 0 0
-TOtAL-
71-128-4994421184
29.8
5702-020 RDCO1200000 -r--_ _--_ _--_-_ _-_--_--_ _--_ _-_--_ _ _-_ _--_ _-_ _--_-_ _--_ _-__ ___
1000000-
800000 --
600000 -
400000-
200000 -
Estimates
Actuals
-k)
_--
---- O ----
0-- (
-- 0 ----
II
- X T r --- --I 0 -
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Fiscal Period
(i'
FiscaI Period _ -- _ _Est. Period Cost -7
Act. Period Cost 5Variance, $ 2Variance, %
28470595225230.5
276026
_ _ = _ =
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 i____ 11 ~~ ~ 1 42 13 [ 4TOTAL80956 73052 73999 - 85434 78071 84040 -- 78039 I 7284776382 85573 81661 78118
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00
0 0 0 00 0 0 0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
5059522252
30.5Est. IAct. IPeroVariaVaria
FYCumul 72847 148873 225255 310828 392489 470607 551563 624615 698614 784048 862119 946159 1024198FY Cumul 50595 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0ent Complete 4.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0ance,$ 22252 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0ince, % 30.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0
5702-030 WSE&I1600000 -y------------------
1400000 -
1200000 -
1000000--
800000-
600 000 -
400000-
200000 -
0 -
Estimates
Actuals
0
-- 0-
--- 0 -
_la-(
~~~~~~*1~--I00
½ -k
5 60 I 2 3 4 7 8 9 10 1 1 12 13
Fiscal Period
- I-Fiscal PeriodEst.PeidCsAct. Period CostVariance, $Variance, %
2- 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 0 11 12 13 TOTAL- -- - ----------------- --- -
------ ------ ------ ------ .-- --
Est. FY CumulAct. FY CumulPercent CompleteVariance, $Variance, %
125888 135970 138808 143257 122401 105570 107206 107311 109538 115003 98625 94433 9347268224 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 057664 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
45.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.012 8 8 261858 4,00666 54392 666330 - -771900 879106 9 86417 1 9 55 121 9 8 1 0 5 3 1 0 0 6 1497488
68224 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
57664 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 045.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1258886822457664
45.8
5702-040 QAsana~~ff -he-
Estimates
Actuals160000 -
120000 -
80000 -
40000 -
0
0
-J
(_ -e
kye
'-
-e-
.~~~~4< -
~--- ~- e
.1 - -- -- 1 - -- I -- 1I I i
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
.I- - -.V . - I _
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Fiscal Period
(
Fiscal Period 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 _ 9 10 11 12 13Est. Period Cost 10638 13905 10561 13682 13929 10608 25386 10718 1 4105 13684 1032 13780 9107Act. Period Cost 14391 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Variance, $ -3753 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Variance, % -35.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 __ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Est. FYCumul 10638 24543 35104 48786 62715 73323 98709 109427 123532 1- 37216 147948 161728 170835Act. FY Cumul 14391 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Percent Complete 8.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Variance, $ -3753 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Variance, % -35.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 __ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
-- TOTAL10638
14391-3753-35.3
.~~~~~~~~~~~~ -- - _ ~ - _ _ - _- _ _ ._- _ _..____..
5702-060 PA1600000-
1400000-
1200000-
1000000 -
800000-
600000-
400000--
200000 -
0-'
_ _ ______ __ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _
Estimates
Actuals-C
-- �01-
(
II0
--- I-- ---- -- - - ----- --- - ---- - - - ---- -- -5 6 7 8 9 10 I11 1 2 1 30 1 2 3 4
Fiscal Period
_______ (
Fiscal PeriodEst. Period CostAct. Period CostVariance, $Variance, %
F Est. FY CumulAct FY CumulPercent CompleteVariance, $Variance, %
_47C72
1 =- 2 3 _ 3 4 5 _ 6 = 7= =8 9 10 _ =11 12Q570 122060 120060 115766 123501 113900 118249 114081 123414 116134 119771 122325'1317 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08253 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
13 ..108151
00
TOTAL1095707131738253
34.934.9 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0--- .0 0.0 0.0 0--- - .010957071317
4.738253
34.9
2316300
0.00
0.0
3516900
0.00
0.0
4674560
0.00
0.0
5909570
0.00
0.0
_
=- . __ _
704857 8231060 0
0.0 0.00 0
0.0 0.0
937187 1C0
0.00
0.0
)606010
0.00
0.0
1176735 1296506 1418831 15269820 0 0 0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0 0 0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
5702-070 COPS2800000 T--- --- - ------- -- ---
2400000--
2000000 -
1600000--
1200000-
800000 --
400000-
Estimates-
Actuals
--'a-
II
--- ---- I ---- - - --- --- -- -- --- - --- 1- - --- r I -F Vj
o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Fiscal Period
Fiscal Period _= j= 1___ 2 3 =_4_ _ 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13Est. Period CostAct. Period CostVariance, $Variance, %Est. FY CumulAct. FY CumulPercent CompleteVariance, $Variance, %
172961163011
99505.8
19869900
0.0
18958900
0.0172961163011
7.09950
5.8
3716600
0.00
0.0
5612490
0.00
0.0
18826100
0.0749510 -
00.0
00.0
153705 144459 176149 188304 188072 192530 189053 191174 1469260 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0903215 1047674 1223823 1412127 1600199 1792729 1981782 2172956 2319882
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
__tTAL172961163011
9950. 5.8
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0__ ___
5704-000 Overall Research240000 -T -- -- - ----
200000-
160000 -
120000-
80000 -
40000
-
Estimates- ou-
Actuals ~~--0
I
__I_-er
(
___
- ____
!`�� -- -- --I - --- - - I - ----- - 1 I -- -- 1 -- ---- -- -- ---0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Fiscal Period
(
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 TOTAL_ = , _
Est. Period CostAct. Period CostVariance, $Variance, %Est.FY CumulAct FY CumulPercent CompleteVariance, $Variance, _
1816512002616333.9
1819200
0.0
20 159 14617 6479 6744 6890 109890 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2422200
0.0
2351900
0.0
2554100
0.0_ . . _ _ =_
1816512002
6.46163
3ED357 56516 71133 77612 8,0 0 0 0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0 0 0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
4356 91246 1022350 0 0
0.0 0.0 0.00 0 0
_ _
1264570
0.00
1499760
0.00
1755170
0.00
0_ .0 --
5666 55140 00 0
0.0 0.0181183 186697
0 00.0 0.0
0 00.0 0.0
18165120026163
. _---33 9
339 _ 0.0 _ _ 0.0 _ _ 0.0 0.0-0
5704-01 0 Geochemistry400000 -
350000Estimates
Actuals300000
-~~~~~~0 (250000 --
200000 -
150000 -
100000 -
--ev-
II)
500C)O - -......,, -
0 ; T r T
0 1 2 3 4
T - I -
8
_ - I - ------ -- _ _ _ _- 1 -_ _ ---
9 10 11 12 135 6 7
Fiscal Period
Fiscal PeriodEst. Period CostAct. Period CostVariance, $Variance, _Est. FY CumutAct. FY CumulPercent CompleteVariance, $Variance, %
-- 1 2 324925 2565 2571614532 0 010393 0 0
41.7 0.0 0.024925 50530 7624614532 0 0
4.3 0.0 0.010393 0 0
41.7 0.0 0.0
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 -13
25681 25567 -- 25666 33311 25916 -- 25267 25825 25653 25432 205120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0101927 127494 153160 186471 212387 237654 263479 289132 314564 335076
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
_ TOTAL249251453210393
41.7
5704-020 Thermo500000 - -- ----
400000
300000 -
200000-
100000
0 -
Estimates----
ActualsA3~ ~~~- k
C
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3
Fiscal Period
Fiscal PeriodIE t. Perio-d Co'stAct. Period CostVariance, $Variance, %
1 2t
2821829477-1259
-4.5
3197300
0.0lE-st.FY C6umul - - 2 8218 - 60191-Act. FY Cumul 29477 0Percent Complete 7.6 0.0Variance, $ -1259 0Variance, % 1 -4.5 0.0
3 _ 4 5678 9 0 iT 1 2 1 3 TC28697 31891 28754 31-875 29239 31-~713 -- 2-8674 32279 28-727 3160 539
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 _ 0.0 ___0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 __ 0.0 0.0
)TAL28218
29477-1259
-4.5
5704-030 Seismic
Estimates
500000-
Actuals
400000 ~&
300000
200000
0 1234567 8 011 2 1 3
FiclPeriod
Fiscal Period 1 2 3 4 5 6 _ 7 8 9 10 1 11 12 13 TOTALEst. Period Cost 36908 48126 50345 37736 30147 295 355 3701- 384~50- 293006 -29735 370 37366 --- 36908-Act. Period Cost 32007 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32007Variance, $ 4901 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4901Variance, V0 13.3 0.0 _ 0.0 __ 0.0 0.0 __ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 _ 13.3Etst FY cumul 369048- 85034 -135379 173115 203262 232520 267105 304806 343256 372556 -40291 4-- 321 -- 471387Act. FY Cumul 32007 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Percent Complete 6.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Variance, $ 4901 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Variance,,% ___ 1. 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
5704-040 IWPE600000-
500000 -
400000
300000
200000-
100000
0
Estimates-
Actuals---,a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -
(
I-ON
-IX - - - --- - y I - I T
8 9 10 11 12 13-h r
1 2 3 4-- T ----- r -------- -
0 5 6 7
Fiscal Period
F[scwPeriodEst. Period CostAct. Period CostVariance, $Variance, _Est. FY CumulAct. FY CumulPercent CompleteVariance, $Variance, %
_ _ _ . _ _
1 2 3 4 5 6 743491 46156 45544 47421 52150 44594 56431747 0 0 0 0 011744 0 0 0 0 0
27.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.043491 89647 135191 182612 234762 279356 3358(31747 0 0 0 0 0
5.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.011744 0 0 0 0 0
27.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 C
46 410(
_ _ _ ._ _ _ _
9 1006 38461 415020 0 00 0 0
00
1 T_ ___ _ 131 1 _ 12_- 13-35632 35442 36987
0 0 00 0 0
0.0 0.0 0.0491953 527395 564382
TOTAL434913174711744
27.0O 0.0 0.002 376808 4152690 0 01.0 0.0 0.0
0.0456321
0 0 0 00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0 0 0 00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0 00.0 0.0
5704-050 Stochastic280000 _ _ _
240000 -
200000-
160000 -
120000-
80000 -
40000
0-
Estimatesc_ a
Actuals-o
i-/
---- (3I - (
��0����
-- ___- T I - -- - I��I -.-.- -- r- --- �r� i r
I
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Fiscal Period8 9 10 1 1 12 13
Fiscal Period -Est. Period CostAct. Period CostVariance, $Variance, %Est. FY CumulAct. FY CumulPercent CompleteVariance, $Variance, %
1 2 3 4 6 7i 8 9 10 i 1 12 1322558 24722 18010 17861 16447 15961 21193 16175 16378 17865 15871 16775 1609320588 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1970 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08.7 0.0 00 00 0.0 _00 0.0 000 0 00 00 _ 0.0 _ _00
22558 47280 65290 83151 99598 115559 136752 152927 169305 187170 203041 219816 23590920588 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.01970 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8.7 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
TOTAL2255820588
1970__ 87
5704-060 Analogs500000 ---r--
Estimates
Actuals ,_ 1J X400000 --
300000-(
02
200000-
100000 -
0
_-e.
---
,Aa
0 T2
_ -- I - --- - I --v- - - -- - I ----- ---- -- - -- - -- -- - -I - -- I -- - -- -- - T - - - ----- --X -
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Fiscal Period
Fiscai Period 1 2 3 4Est. Period CostAct. Period CostVariance, $Variance, %Est. FY CumulAct. FY CumulPercent CompleteVariance, $Variance, %
31666 36741 3113128400 0 03266 0 010.3 0.0 0.0
31666 68407 9953828400 0 0
6.3 0.0 0.03266 0 010.3 _ __ 0.0__ 0.0
413560
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1333021 35867 31751 36172 32923 41203 30239 34489 36167
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL3166628400326610.3
00.0
140894 173C0
0.00
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0915 209782 241533 277705 310628 351831 382070 416559 452726
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
5704-070 Sorption!Estimates500000 Actuals
400000(
300000-
200000 -
100000-
0 --- - ---- --- I 1 -f
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Fiscal Period
Fiscal Perio-d- 1 _2 _3 -4- 5 - 6 __89 __10 __ 1123 TOTALEst. Peri-od Cost 38569 39381 39243__ 42428 - 900 39_352 ---- 42833 38909 39373 42213 39392 -39303- 38052- 38569Act. Period Cost 29403 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29403Variance, $ 9166 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9166Variance, % 23.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 __ 0.0 __0.0 0.0 23.8Est. FYCumul 38569 77950 117193 159621 _198651 2300 2808623974835118 4013i - 4406723 - 480065_18 078 -Act. FY Cumul 29403 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Percent Complete 5.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Variance, $ 9166 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Variance, % -___ 23.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 --
---- --- ---- -- - - � ---- -I---9 I
5704-120 Volcanism350000 -
300000 -
250000
200000 -
k)
-0-�
,,le
(
150000 -
100000 -
50000 -0
0 1 2--- - -- -
53 4I 1
6 7
Fiscal Period
-- -- I----- -- --l -- I0-- - 1 -- 2 - 13---- -8 9 1 0 1 1 12 1 3
(.
Fiscal Period 1 2 3 4 5Est. Period CostAct. Period CostVariance, $Variance, %Est.FYCumulAct FY CumulPercent CompleteVariance, $Variance, %
21096 20956 21873 21264 2133034722 0 0 0 0-13626 0 0 0 0
-64.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.021096 42052 63925 85189 10651934722 0 0 0 0
10.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-13626 0 0 0 0
-64.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
6 - 7 _____ 8 9 10 1121161 28400 21305 30509 29356 34301
0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1 2 1 314 3 - - -2--3-- 29839 26863
0 00 0
0.0 0.0301390 328253
0 0
TOTAL2109634722
-13626-64.6
1276800
0.00
0.0
156 080 177385 207894 237250 2715510 0 0 0 0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0. _ , _ . . _ _ _ . , _ _ _ . _ . _ . , . _ . . .
5704-190 PA ResearchI 100MI -
Estimates
Actuals -k1 ~ ~ ~ __800000
600000 -
400000 -
200000 -
0-
-__-0 _ (
tDI
t `----T - -- .---- - - --- - T T F I I I TI - -~T- -------
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Fiscal Period
Fiscal PeriodEst. Period CostAct. Period CostVariance, $Variance, %Est. FY CumulAct. FY CumulPercent CompleteVariance, $Variance, %
1 - 2 3 465493 66775 66141 6728614231 0 0 051262 0 0 0
78.3 0.0 0.0 0.065493 132268 198409 26569514231 0 0 0
1.6 0.0 0.0 0.051262 0 0 0
78.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
5 ___ 6 7 8 9--9 10 12 i366831 65621 77507 66149 66540 68300 65557 67111 59471
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0332526 398147 475654 541803 608343 -676643 742200 809311i 868782
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0
TOTAL654931423151262
78.3
5705 LSSA240000
200000-
160000
Estimates
Actuals
.
�0-��
(
1200C
800C
)0- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4
'0 --
'0 - z xI -
400C
-7
0
£.'
r-r - I I -T -- --------------- - - ----- - - --- -T
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Fiscal Period
_ . . . .. _- _- _ _ .- . . ., .. . . .- _- _- I -.( I
Fiscal PeriodEst. Period CostAct. Period CostVariance, $Variance, %Est. FY Cu _ulAct. FY CumulPercent CompleteVariance, $Variance, %
1 226644 3289616724 09920 037.2 0.0
26644 5954016724 0
7.9 0.09920 037.2 0.0
3 4 5 6 7 - -- 8- -_
2974800
0.089288
00.0
00.0
16801 9569 13221 125290 0 0 00 0 0 0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0106089 1 15658 -128879 141408
0 0 0 00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0 0 00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
18463
00
0.0
9 10 _ 1 12 1310993 9970 9722 1 1836 9745
0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0
0.0159871
00.0
00.0
1708640
0.00
0.0
18C0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
F834 190556 202392 2121370 0 0 0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0 0 0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
TOTAL26644167249920372
5706 WSS I350000
t�w
300000 --
250000 -
200000-
150000-
100000 -
50000 -
0
Estimates
Actuals
*-,er- (
_
,, ./__
~~-0~~~
~~- 0 - _ _ _ - -- I - - . T _ - -- f _ _ _ T- -F _ _- _ _T __ , .I - I . IW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Fiscal Period
Fiscal PeriodEst. Period CosAct. Period CosVariance, $Variance, %
1 2 3 4 S 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 TOT19299 18059 26925 29621 15443 12595 14257 16216 25491 24628 20923 - 30132 34381 9_
st 3844 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 315455 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15
__ ____._80 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
29B4445580.1
Est. FY CumulAct. FY CumulPercent CompleteVariance, $Variance, %
192993844
1.315455
80.1
373580
0.00
0.0
642830
0.00
0.0
93904 1093470 0
0.0 0.00 0
0.0 0.0
121942 136199 152415 177906 202534 223457 253589 28i9700 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 00
i
I
.I
5707 MRS240000
200000 -
160000 -
120000 -
80000 -
40000 -
0
LEstimatesActuals
�-0
---- 0---
A-y-
C-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
i
Ip.
- " ~ - ------ -I- - ___
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3
Fiscal Period
Fiscal-P-eri-od - ---Est. Period CostAct. Period CostVariance, $Variance. A
1 __2 3456 78 _ _ 9 _ 10 _ 11 12 1310706 13137 14383 13233 12960 108 35 18860 16950 19214 18402 17263 1726312228 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0-1522 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0-14.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 _ 0.0 0.0 _ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
10706 23843 38226 - 51459 64419 77477 91035 109895 126845 146059 164461- 181724 19898712228 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-1522 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0-14.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
I TOTAL-
12228-1522-14.2
Est. FY CurnulAct. FY CumulPercent CompleteVariance, $Variance, 04
