28
Clinical Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by NGS: Two Years Strong Kimberlee Musser, PhD Chief, Bacterial Diseases Wadsworth Center

Clinical Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosisby NGS: Two ...60. 70. 80. 90. 100. Sensitivty. Molecular INH Resistance Prediction. katG 315. katG 315 inhA -15. 2016. 2017. Future

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Clinical Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosisby NGS: Two ...60. 70. 80. 90. 100. Sensitivty. Molecular INH Resistance Prediction. katG 315. katG 315 inhA -15. 2016. 2017. Future

Clinical Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by NGS: Two Years Strong

Kimberlee Musser, PhDChief, Bacterial DiseasesWadsworth Center

Page 2: Clinical Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosisby NGS: Two ...60. 70. 80. 90. 100. Sensitivty. Molecular INH Resistance Prediction. katG 315. katG 315 inhA -15. 2016. 2017. Future

Why NGS on TB?

Page 3: Clinical Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosisby NGS: Two ...60. 70. 80. 90. 100. Sensitivty. Molecular INH Resistance Prediction. katG 315. katG 315 inhA -15. 2016. 2017. Future

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

TB Cases* 954 910 866 872 787 765 768

DR-TB 63 74 67 54 62 61 54

MDR-TB 14 20 19 8 11 6 10

XDR-TB 0 2 2 0 2 0 1

* National rank #3 or #4 each year by number of cases

TB in New YorkUniversal FAST TRACK program:• Implemented in 1993• Rapid detection of MTBC

from a priority group of highly infectious NY patients with newly diagnosed AFB smear positive sputum

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

Perc

enta

ge

DR-TB MDR-TB

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Presenter
Presentation Notes
DR is defined as Isoniazid resistance reported by CDC MDR is defined as Isoniazid and Rifampin resistance reported by CDC TB Cases also reported by CDC in their annual report
Page 4: Clinical Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosisby NGS: Two ...60. 70. 80. 90. 100. Sensitivty. Molecular INH Resistance Prediction. katG 315. katG 315 inhA -15. 2016. 2017. Future

Whole-genome sequencing for TB?

• Goals for TB WGS:– Utilize as soon as possible in testing

algorithm to impact patient treatment– Expand molecular resistance prediction– Provide more comprehensive results

• mixed infections, heteroresistance, typing

– Assess costs and staff time

2013- Wadsworth Center Public Health Genomics Center (PHGC) funding announcement

2014- PHGC funding to test 60 TB isolates by WGS

Page 5: Clinical Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosisby NGS: Two ...60. 70. 80. 90. 100. Sensitivty. Molecular INH Resistance Prediction. katG 315. katG 315 inhA -15. 2016. 2017. Future

Developing a TB WGS Assay

• Starting material Day 0 MGIT• Compare DNA preparation methods• Nextera XT/ MiSeq• Build Pipeline• LIMS/ Epidemiology Reporting (ECLRS)• Validation Plan

Page 6: Clinical Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosisby NGS: Two ...60. 70. 80. 90. 100. Sensitivty. Molecular INH Resistance Prediction. katG 315. katG 315 inhA -15. 2016. 2017. Future

TB Bioinformatics Pipeline

Bioinformatics

KrakenK-mer

matching

Detect spacers

SNP calling with indels

SNP calling ignore indels

Map to Reference Genome

Importing into LIMS

MTBC member ID

SpoligotypingPrediction of antibiotic resistance

Strain typing-relatedness

Report

Page 7: Clinical Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosisby NGS: Two ...60. 70. 80. 90. 100. Sensitivty. Molecular INH Resistance Prediction. katG 315. katG 315 inhA -15. 2016. 2017. Future

Imagine shredding a whole book into millions of shreds…then trying to put it back together in the right order

How do we apply quality control to this complicated method?

Page 8: Clinical Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosisby NGS: Two ...60. 70. 80. 90. 100. Sensitivty. Molecular INH Resistance Prediction. katG 315. katG 315 inhA -15. 2016. 2017. Future

Extract DNA

Library Preparation

DNAsequencing

Nextera XT

QC QC QC

QC

Bioinformaticpipeline

QC

Controls, QC, and more QC…

Page 9: Clinical Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosisby NGS: Two ...60. 70. 80. 90. 100. Sensitivty. Molecular INH Resistance Prediction. katG 315. katG 315 inhA -15. 2016. 2017. Future

What’s in a pipeline?• Species ID• Spoligotype derivation

• Resistance Prediction– Single Nucleotide

Polymorphism (SNP)– Insertion/ deletions

• Phylogenetic Analysis

• Results & Reporting

Presenter
Presentation Notes
The details of how this happen aren’t so important- the breadth of results we can extract are important
Page 10: Clinical Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosisby NGS: Two ...60. 70. 80. 90. 100. Sensitivty. Molecular INH Resistance Prediction. katG 315. katG 315 inhA -15. 2016. 2017. Future

CLEP QC Guidance

• Minimum base calling of Q20 (99% base call accuracy)

• Minimum average 40x depth of coverage

• All QC metrics must be documented and monitored over time

• All software updates that affect key processes should be revalidated

Page 11: Clinical Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosisby NGS: Two ...60. 70. 80. 90. 100. Sensitivty. Molecular INH Resistance Prediction. katG 315. katG 315 inhA -15. 2016. 2017. Future

So many moving parts…

Bio-informaticsNGS

Core

TB Lab

Molecular TB

Page 12: Clinical Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosisby NGS: Two ...60. 70. 80. 90. 100. Sensitivty. Molecular INH Resistance Prediction. katG 315. katG 315 inhA -15. 2016. 2017. Future

High-confidence mutations

Drug Locus Codon/NT positionRifampin (RIF) rpoB 251, 511, 513, 516, 522, 526, 531, 533, 572

Isoniazid (INH) katGoxyR-ahpC promoter regionmabA promoter regionmabAinhA

279, 315, 394, 525 -81-17, -15, -820394

Pyrazinamide (PZA) pncA/pncA promoter region Any nonsynonymous change

Ethambutol (EMB) embB 306, 406, 497

Streptomycin (SM) rrsrpsL

512, 513, 516, 90643, 88

Kanamycin/Amikacin (KAN/AMI)

rrs 1401

Kanamycin (KAN) eis promoter region -10, -37

Fluroquinolones (FLQ) gyrAgyrB

74, 90, 91, 94510

Ethionamide (ETH) mabA promoter regionmabAethA

-17, -15, -8203Frameshift/STOP

Red =Current validated pipeline

Page 13: Clinical Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosisby NGS: Two ...60. 70. 80. 90. 100. Sensitivty. Molecular INH Resistance Prediction. katG 315. katG 315 inhA -15. 2016. 2017. Future

Putting it all together…• Detailed SOP or SOPs

– All QC, limitations, step by step details

• Reporting– Interpretation, disclaimers,

examples• Quality Control

– Metrics, criteria, controls• Validation

– Specificity– Reproducibility (Inter- and Intra-)– Accuracy verification

Page 14: Clinical Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosisby NGS: Two ...60. 70. 80. 90. 100. Sensitivty. Molecular INH Resistance Prediction. katG 315. katG 315 inhA -15. 2016. 2017. Future

Import of pipeline

LIMS Final Laboratory

Reportmutations

Interpretation

Separating SOPs makes future assay development more streamlined

Page 15: Clinical Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosisby NGS: Two ...60. 70. 80. 90. 100. Sensitivty. Molecular INH Resistance Prediction. katG 315. katG 315 inhA -15. 2016. 2017. Future

SOP QC Examples…

Page 16: Clinical Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosisby NGS: Two ...60. 70. 80. 90. 100. Sensitivty. Molecular INH Resistance Prediction. katG 315. katG 315 inhA -15. 2016. 2017. Future

Retrospective study: Fluoroquinolone comparison

Validating against other molecular tests

Validating against DST

Page 17: Clinical Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosisby NGS: Two ...60. 70. 80. 90. 100. Sensitivty. Molecular INH Resistance Prediction. katG 315. katG 315 inhA -15. 2016. 2017. Future

Retrospective Study: Isoniazid comparison

Page 18: Clinical Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosisby NGS: Two ...60. 70. 80. 90. 100. Sensitivty. Molecular INH Resistance Prediction. katG 315. katG 315 inhA -15. 2016. 2017. Future

50

60

70

80

90

100

Sens

itivt

yMolecular INH Resistance Prediction

katG315

katG 315 inhA -15

2016 2017 Future

pyrosequencing WGS

Presenter
Presentation Notes
The first 2 spots demonstrate the success of pyro, with our initial panel of GS mutations, we increased a lot, refined to add some nice inhA and katG mutations. This brough us over 91%, but we still have more to do. As we detect these repeatedly, we can improve. We just can’t say how long it will take
Page 19: Clinical Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosisby NGS: Two ...60. 70. 80. 90. 100. Sensitivty. Molecular INH Resistance Prediction. katG 315. katG 315 inhA -15. 2016. 2017. Future

What have we learned in 2+ years…

• Communication with NGS Core and bioinformaticians is critical!

• Discordance almost always is determined to be due to AST

• Not that many surprises, but continual improvement

• TB Control Epidemiologists and Regional NY colleagues love this data!

Page 20: Clinical Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosisby NGS: Two ...60. 70. 80. 90. 100. Sensitivty. Molecular INH Resistance Prediction. katG 315. katG 315 inhA -15. 2016. 2017. Future

2015

Page 21: Clinical Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosisby NGS: Two ...60. 70. 80. 90. 100. Sensitivty. Molecular INH Resistance Prediction. katG 315. katG 315 inhA -15. 2016. 2017. Future

What have we learned from NYS CLEP and CLIA Surveys?

• This type of testing is new to everyone• Special internal audit with our QA Officer helpful• Memos stating assay developers when training

documentation doesn’t make sense• Able to utilize CDC Model Performance Evaluation

Program (MPEP) for Internal Quality Assurance• Tracking and QC reagents and Log • Documenting pipeline updates

Page 22: Clinical Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosisby NGS: Two ...60. 70. 80. 90. 100. Sensitivty. Molecular INH Resistance Prediction. katG 315. katG 315 inhA -15. 2016. 2017. Future

Looking back…what would we do differently?

Consider instrumentation redundancy, utilize pivot tables to manage data, talk as much as possible about pipeline needs, talk more to TB controllers, develop training and competency documents, reagent logs and assessments initially

Page 23: Clinical Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosisby NGS: Two ...60. 70. 80. 90. 100. Sensitivty. Molecular INH Resistance Prediction. katG 315. katG 315 inhA -15. 2016. 2017. Future

Future• Direct Sputum testing research

• WGS pipeline (2017)–Added drugs AST for MDR

strains–WGS targets linezolid,

clofazimine, PAS, bedaquiline–thyA stop mutation- PAS

resistance

• Third pipeline update (2018)– New mutations– New mutation category

(unclassified)– Externally facing pipeline

• Discontinuing DST very conservative approach on strains with no markers for resistance

• Funding– NIH R03- Evaluate TB WGS directly

on sputum specimens– NIH grant award Nanopore

MinION TB– APHL/CDC RFA to perform TB WGS

Presenter
Presentation Notes
This would be essentially an expanded pyro- available in the same time frame
Page 24: Clinical Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosisby NGS: Two ...60. 70. 80. 90. 100. Sensitivty. Molecular INH Resistance Prediction. katG 315. katG 315 inhA -15. 2016. 2017. Future

How about Antimicrobial Resistance?

• To determine a novel carbapenemasemechanism

• To detect an IMP variant (other than IMP1)• To assess other resistance genes• (To determine relatedness)

Page 25: Clinical Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosisby NGS: Two ...60. 70. 80. 90. 100. Sensitivty. Molecular INH Resistance Prediction. katG 315. katG 315 inhA -15. 2016. 2017. Future

Why NGS on TB?

Page 26: Clinical Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosisby NGS: Two ...60. 70. 80. 90. 100. Sensitivty. Molecular INH Resistance Prediction. katG 315. katG 315 inhA -15. 2016. 2017. Future

What if there were also random pages included in the pile that needed to stay with the book

PlasmidPlasmid

Page 27: Clinical Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosisby NGS: Two ...60. 70. 80. 90. 100. Sensitivty. Molecular INH Resistance Prediction. katG 315. katG 315 inhA -15. 2016. 2017. Future

Along came an ARLN fellow…

Identification of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes Using:1. ResFinder2. ARG-ANNOT3. NCBI AR Database

Species ID CheckMulti-locus Sequence

Typing

Illumina Sequencing ReadsCollect all dataCharacterization of isolatesRepeat some initial testingBuild pipeline and validateAssess WGSSummarizeCollaborate

Page 28: Clinical Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosisby NGS: Two ...60. 70. 80. 90. 100. Sensitivty. Molecular INH Resistance Prediction. katG 315. katG 315 inhA -15. 2016. 2017. Future

AcknowledgementsCore TB WGS TeamVincent Escuyer Kim MusserTanya Halse Joseph SheaPascal Lapierre

ARLN TeamElizabeth Nazarian, Kara Mitchell,Emily Snavely

MYCOBACTERIOLOGY LABMOLECULAR BACTERIOLOGY LAB

APPLIED GENOMIC TECHNOLOGIES CORE

BIOINFORMATICS COREMike Palumbo Erica Lasek-Nesselquist, Wolfgang Haas

CLIMSColleen Walsh, Alok Mehta

Wadsworth CLEP Reviewers, CLEP staff

NYC PHLJennifer Rakeman, John Kornblum, Jamie LemonWadsworth Center Jill Taylor, Victoria Derbyshire, Ron Limberger

R03 NIH- Use of whole genome sequencing for tuberculosis diagnostics *New Funding NIH MinION TB project

CDCAngela Starks, Jamie Posey

APHLAnne Gaynor

NYS TB Control, NYC TB Control

National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention

Wadsworth Center, NYSDOHPublic Health Genomics Initiative

Establishment of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex WGS Reference Centers APHL/CDC