Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Climate Change risk and Agricultural Productivity in the Sahel
Imed Drine and Younfu Huang
World Institute for Development Economics Research, United Nations University UNU WIDER)
1
The Sahel is extremely vulnerable to climate change due to its geographical location
2
“ The combined threat of drought, high food prises, displacement and chronic poverty is affecting millions of people in 2012 as n new food crisis emerge across the Sahel region. Food insecurity and malnutrition are recurrent in the region with more than 16 million people directly at risk this year.” FAO
3 Source : Aljazeera net
Recurrent droughts caused important losses of agricultural production and livestock
4 Source : Aljazeera net
Climate in the Sahel
• According to many experts rainfall in the region has become less reliable and growing seasons are shorter.
• The Sahel is characterised by irregular rainfall that ranges between 200 mm and 600 mm with coefficients of variation ranging from 15 to 30 percent (Fox and Rockström, 2003;CILSS, 2004)
• Harvests of major food crops are highly uncertain due to recurrent droughts (two out of every five years).
5
The Observed and Projected 5-Year Mean Rainfall in Sahel
6
Source: Held et al. (2005).
According to the IPCC, a rainfall decrease of 29-49% was observed in the 1968-1997 period compared to the 1931-60 baseline period
Agriculture in the Sahel : Poor performance
• Agriculture in the Sahelian countries is underdeveloped and almost totally dependent on rainfall.
• Agriculture is characterized by the low use of improved seeds and fertilizers, the absence of mechanization, and poor linkage to markets.
• Mendelsohn et al. (2000): 3 African countries will virtually lose their entire rainfed agriculture by 2100 and two of them are Sahelien countries: Chad and Niger
7
Agriculture in the Sahel: Important for food security in the Sahel
8
0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.90 0.88 0.89 0.88 0.88 0.85 0.82 0.76
0.69 0.74
0.82 0.79 0.76 0.77 0.75 0.75 0.78 0.70 0.68 0.66
0.72 0.78 0.79 0.79 0.81
0.77 0.75 0.77 0.78 0.82 0.81 0.78
0.74 0.72 0.76 0.76 0.73
0.70 0.76
0.73 0.73 0.73 0.71 0.75 0.74
0.000.100.200.300.400.500.600.700.800.901.00
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Domestic supply per capita Production per capita
Share of Domestic Production in total supply
Investment in agriculture in the Sahel
• Highly risks of crop failure
• Low value of major cereal crops
• Poor road infrastructures and Poor access to market
Investing in new production technologies (new seeds, fertilizers, ….) to improve productivity is not profitable
9
Fox and Rockström (2003): “Supplement irrigation for dry-spell mitigation of rainfed agriculture in the Sahel”, Agriculture and Water Management, 61.
1998 1999 2000 1998-2000
Mean (kg/ha)
S.D. (kg/ha)
Mean (kg/ha)
S.D. (kg/ha)
Mean (kg/ha)
S.D. (kg/ha)
Mean (kg/ha)
S.D. (kg/ha)
Control Treatment (farmer’s normal practice) 666 154 238 25 460 222 455 232
Irrigation application 961 237 388 182 787 230 712 320
Fertilise application 1470 254 647 55 807 176 975 404
Irrigation and Fertilisers 1747 215 972 87 1489 123 1403 367
10
1998 (571 mm)
1999 (667 mm)
2000 (418 mm)
Control Treatment (farmer’s normal practice) 1.16 0.36 1.10 Irrigation application 1.51 0.53 1.54 Fertilise application 2.55 0.97 1.93 Irrigation and Fertilisers 2.75 1.34 2.93
Rain water use efficiency for mean grain yield per hectare (kg/mm/ha)
Observed average grain yields
Empirical Analysis
Objective of this work: How does drought risk affect agricultural productivity in the Sahel? • Test the impact of weather risk on agricultural productivity • 6 Countries : Burkina Faso, Chad, Mali, Mauritania, Niger, and Senegal. We proceed in 6 steps : 1. We use the Standardized Precipitation Index ( SPI ) to identify drought episodes
over the period 1901-2000. 2. Estimate crop losses associated with drought shock relative to the nearest normal growing season. (main crops) 3. Probability distribution of crop losses 4. The Drought Risk is defined as crop losses times the probability of occurrence
of drought shock 5. Estimate agricultural technical efficiency using the stochastic frontier approach 6. Test the impact of the drought risk on the agricultural technical efficiency
11
The impact of drought risk on farmer’s decision
States of nature
Technologies Normal year Dry year
Standard technology (low cost (Cn), normal production (Yn)) (low cost (Cn), low production (Yd))
Drought- resilient technology
(high cost (Ch), high production (Yh)) (high cost (Ch), normal production (Yn))
12
Let P denotes the probability associated with the drought shock: • Using the standard technology : Profit (S): P*(Yd-Cn)+(1-P)*(Yn-Cn) • Using the Drought- resilient technology : Profit (H) : P*(Yn-Ch)+(1-P)*(Yh-Ch) The farmer prefers the Drought- resilient technology only if : P*(Yn -Yd) > ( (Ch-Cn) – (1-P)*(Yh-Yn))
Drought- resilient technology : Using fertilizers + new seed varieties
SPI for the Sahel: Growing Season (June-October)
13
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
1901
1904
1907
1910
1913
1916
1919
1922
1925
1928
1931
1934
1937
1940
1943
1946
1949
1952
1955
1958
1961
1964
1967
1970
1973
1976
1979
1982
1985
1988
1991
1994
1997
2000
SPI_Sahel
Drought Damages: Crop losses (%) Burkina Faso Chad Mali Mauritania Niger Senegal
1972 26% 37% 21% 48% 31% 45%
1973 30% 30% 23% 47% 47% 25%
1977 15% 31% 31% 27% 23% 27%
1980 9% 29% 33% 28% 24% 33%
1982 9% 5% 27% 26% 33% 26%
1983 18% 26% 22% 28% 58% 39%
1984 6% 28% 35% 19% 30% 34%
1985 11% 31% 10%
1986 17% 46% 17%
1987 21% 5% 21% 8%
1990 4% 24% 33% 19% 40% 15%
1991 17% 4% 35% 51% 11%
1992 1% 34% 19% 52% 16%
1993 31% 31% 17% 42% 9%
1996 19% 3% 14% 56% 18%
1997 21% 6% 28% 35% 26%
Average 15% 25% 25% 30% 35% 30%
14
LEP curve for the Sahel
15
Exceedance probability
Production loss (%)
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
Technical Efficiency
16
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.2
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Burkina Faso Chad Mali Mauritania Niger Senegal
Regression results
17
• An increase of climate risk by 1% results in a decrease in technical efficiency by 0.66% • Openness to trade and private investment may help to weather the negative impact of
climate risk on agricultural productivity
Long-run versus Short-run effects
Variables Long-run Effects Risk -0.22*** Risk_2 0.21*** Precipitation 0.39*** Precipitation_2 -0.043*** Fertlizer Use 0.01*** Consumer Price -0.01***
18
Countries Short-run effects Risk Risk_2
Burkina Faso 0.07*** -0.06*** Mauritania 0.12*** -0.13*** Niger 0.05* -0.11*
Conclusion
• The Sahel is extremely vulnerable to climate change
• Drought frequency, severity and damages are increasing
• Risk related to climate change has a negative impact on agricultural productivity
• Higher investment and more openness to trade reduce the impact of climate uncertainty on agricultural productivity
19
Diagnostic plots for GEV fit to the crop losses
Threshold σ ξ LR Test (P-value) 20% 0.17 -0.41 0.0078
20
Maximum likelihood estimates for excess
Diagnostic plots for GPD fit to the crop losses
www.wider.unu.edu Helsinki, Finland