Click

1

Post-Harvest Loss and Food Waste4 April 2019Montreux, Switzerland

2

Anti-trust Caution

Please be mindful to avoid any discussion in any conversation of competitively sensitive topics, such as:

Pricing, costs

DO NOT exchange information / agree with

competitors on prices and conditions.

Bid strategies

DO NOT exchange information

on how you intend to respond to a tender

Future capacity additions or reductions

DO NOT share other sensitive market

information or specific information

on commercial matters with your competitors.

Customers

DO NOT communicate market information

directly to competitors.

Output decisions

DO NOT exchange individualized

confidential business data of the past 12

months.

4

AGENDA

14.30 • Welcome + notification of antitrust

• Overview of the agenda for today’s session

• Participant introductions

• Context

14.45 Member company knowledge-shares including Q&As:

• Olam (Chris/Vanessa)

• Danfoss (Jonas Loholm Hamann)

• Unilever (Mariska Dotsch), Jacobene Das Gupta (DSM), Michael

Hershkowitz (IFF)

15.30 • FLW accounting and definitions: progress and recommendations

• Working Group draft TOR for discussion and approval

15.55 • Summary of key discussion points and next steps

Production: Global context 1 of 3

5

GHG

emissions

Deforestation Smallholder

livelihoodsWater

management

Production: Global context 2 of 3

6

Production: Global context 3 of 3

7

• A coalition of executives from

governments, businesses,

international organizations,

research institutions, and civil

society dedicated to inspiring

ambition, mobilizing action, and

accelerating progress toward

achieving SDG Target 12.3

TARGET 12.3

By 2030, halve per capita global food waste at the retail and consumer levels and reduce food losses along production and supply chains, including post-harvest losses

Where FLW members can choose to play

8

1. How much crop/product is lost or wasted across all of our value chains (tonnes, $)?

2. How much by-product is being utilised effectively (tonnes composted, energy generated, $ saved,

biomaterials repurposed)?

3. What are the associated impacts on financial, natural, human and social capitals ($, tonnes GHG, m3 water,

land area, % of biomass energy)

4. Where does good practice exist?

Measuring PHL losses Olam Palm GabonPlantation to mill

Measuring PHL losses in Olam Palm Gabon: Context

10

Mouila Plantation

Collection Platform Collected fruitlets Truck transporting bunches to the mill

Auditing losses

Missed / Rotten bunchDropped fruitlets

Mill Weighted truck scale FFB entering the mill Palm Kernel Expeller POME

Fresh Fruit BunchesPlantation rows Agronomist visit

Measuring PHL losses in Olam Palm GabonUsing WRI Food Loss and Waste reporting template

11

Following the WRI Food Loss and Waste standard, Olam Palm Gabon quantified losses across the production, transportation and processing stages of its operations (from plantation to the mill)

Measuring PHL losses in Olam Palm Gabon: Results

12

PRODUCTIONMATURE PLANTATION AREA

CROP LOSS

AWALA

MOUILA

-0.9 t/ha

-0.1 t/ha

-15%

-3.8%

-7,209 MT (FFB)

-US$ 50/ha

-US$1,029,301

TRANSPORTATIONLOSS

MILL LOSS

-US$ 3,101 -US$ 200,502

6,502 ha

13,578 ha

44,926 MT

44,791 MT

-5,851 MT

-1,357 MT

-8.7%

-1.32%

-1.47%

-309 MT (CPO)

-1.4% *

-21.7 MT (FFB)

-0.05%

89,717 MT 18,152 MT

Financial Opportunity Loss

Volume Loss

% Loss

-0.05%

-0.05%

82,509 MT

82,530 MT

* STERILISATION 0.42%, PRESSING 0.20%, CLARIFICATION 0.1%, KERNEL RECOVERY 0.42%, SLUDGE 0.28%

Land area eq. 1,400 ha

Measuring PHL losses Olam Nigeria RiceOutgrowers farms to warehouse

Measuring PHL losses in Olam Nigeria Rice: Purpose

14

OUTGROWER FARM OLAM MILL

16,723 farmers 18,722 Hectares

Milling capacity of 195,000Mts

This collaboration was made possible through the support of the Rockefeller Foundation’s Yieldwise programme

Measuring PHL losses in Olam Nigeria Rice: Approach

15

Methodological approach and data collection

tools

Contextualizing to commodity, value chain and specific

demand

Participatory Validation and

field testing

Modification and adjustments

Data gathering, analysis and synthesizing

learnings

Measuring PHL losses in Olam Nigeria Rice: Results

16

Losses self-reported by farmers

vs measured through the pilotAverage loss per value chain activity

% in actual yield

Production Processing Retail Consumer

Starting point: When a crop is

ready to be harvested, when

an animal is ready to be

slaughtered**

In case the outlet is animal feed or biomaterial processing, for the purposes of achieving SDG Target 12.3, it is not considered food loss or waste*

When quantifying food loss and waste, until processing, include the weight of the entire crop or animal

irrespective of its ultimate use as food or non-food.

Guidance on the definition of WRI Food Loss and Waste Protocol for SDG 12.3

If upon processing, a crop is split into non-food uses (e.g., for bioenergy, animal feed, industrial uses) only the proportion directed to the human food supply chain should be counted as possible food loss or waste.

* The guideline outlined herein seek to build on the Champions 12.3 guidance on interpreting SDG Target 12.3 and seeks to demonstrate agreed descriptions of food loss and waste which are broadly applicable across different companies contributing to producing and processing food.

** this builds on the work of the FLW Standard - FLW Protocol see p18 and p55 adopted from EU Fusions – Recommendations for a common policy p26 (fig. 2) and from FAO [did not find a reference yet]

18

Post-Harvest Loss and Food Waste Working Group DRAFT Terms of Reference

Purpose

To foster value-chain collaboration and strengthen peer learnings on best practice and practical implementation of

post-harvest loss and food waste strategies.

Rationale

• Currently, no single third-party source can provide sufficient country-level data on FLW.

• Opportunity for food and agricultural companies to take a lead in quantification and establish industry and

value chain baselines.

• Anticipated benefits from measuring what is not yet known, include financial savings, resource use efficiency,

higher performance and contribution to climate targets, food availability and better returns on investments

for actors involved.

• WBCSD is well-placed to deliver this industry leadership by connecting and aligning the Climate Smart

Agriculture (CSA), the Global Agribusiness Alliance (GAA) and Food Reform for Sustainability and Health

(FReSH) WBCSD workstreams on the FLW agenda.

19

Case-Studies for

1) peer-learning and joint

problem-solving

2) building a portfolio of evidence

to foster more member

engagement

PHLs in Olam Rice smallholder

value chains (Nigeria, farm to

warehouse)

Next step: Use learnings to

develop Cool Farm Tool FLW

module

Losses in Olam palm oil value

chain (Gabon, plantation to

mill)

Next step: publish and share

Dupont TBC

Danfoss TBC

Unilever TBC

Implementation support and

action through partnership with

WRI

Open to members: WRI point person is Kai Robertson. GAA has a DRAFT Guide available ‘Getting started

with quantifying food loss and waste’ authored by WRI.

Next step: encourage company uptake of WRI supportQuantification through

development, alignment and

adoption of definitions and

measurement methodologies

Accounting for absolute loss,

financial opportunity loss for all

actors and GHG equivalent (rice

production landscape)

Collaboration with WRI to

measure FLW using the Protocol

across member supply chains.

Aligning on definition and

measurement methodologies, project

led by Cargill (Brecht De-Roo)

Food Loss and Waste Value

calculation (Quantis & WRI)Advocacy and engagement with

the global agenda

E.g. WRI, Champions 12.3, EAT, FAO, WRAP, The Food and Land Use Coalition etc...

Next step: identify events, presentation opps for membersP4G – support for and alignment

with Indonesia country deep-dive

N/A GAR

Next steps: RT to update and

align with WG

TBC

Post-Harvest Loss and Food Waste Working Group DRAFT Terms of Reference: work programme

20

Case-Studies for

1) peer-learning and joint problem-solving 2) building a portfolio

of evidence to foster more member engagement

Member case-studies published in WBCSD house-style

and shared online and in-person

Implementation support and action through partnership with WRI CSA, GAA and FReSH to engage their membership and

identify companies seeking to take-up WRI implementation

support ($100k is available, in-kind / year)

Quantification through development, alignment and adoption of

definitions and measurement methodologies

Presentation of recommendations on 4th April at WBCSD LD

meeting for member endorsement by end of April

Advocacy and engagement with the global PHLFW agenda Develop outreach and engagement schedule

P4G – support for and alignment with Indonesia country deep-dive Share alignment opportunities with the Working Group

Explore P4G opps outside of Indonesia

Update members on WRAP’s approach to measure PHLs in

Indonesia

Post-Harvest Loss and Food Waste Working Group DRAFT Terms of Reference: WG Deliverables 2019

Click

21