Upload
catarac19
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/28/2019 clastic sedimentology.docx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/clastic-sedimentologydocx 1/13
Introduction
Carbonates are rocks composed mainly of calcium carbonate, CaCO3. Some examples of
common carbonate rocks are limestones and chalk. Carbonates form by precipitation from water;
either straight from the water, or induced by organisms, to make their shells or skeletons, andthey form in many environments (Figure 1).
F igure 1: Some typical environments that carbonates can form. Redrawn from Tucker and Wright (1990).
Mineralogy
There are three main minerals that form carbonates:
Calcite (CaCO3), which comes in high magnesium and low magnesium forms.
Aragonite (CaCO3), which has a different structure to calcite.
Dolomite (CaMg(CO3)2), a magnesium rich carbonate produced by diagenesis.
Only low magnesium calcite is stable at surface pressure and temperatures. It is therefore the
most common mineral in ancient carbonates. However, most modern carbonates are composed of aragonite as this is the mineral that most biological organisms create to make their shells or
skeletons. Examples of organisms that produce aragonite shells are bivalves (sea shells),
gastropods (snails) and Halimeda (a green algae). Organisms that produce a calcite shell include
brachipods (a rare type of sea shell) and ostrocods (a small crustacean).
7/28/2019 clastic sedimentology.docx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/clastic-sedimentologydocx 2/13
Components
Carbonates can be made of several components. These are:
Bioclasts. Ooids.
Peloids.
Intraclasts.
Micrite.
Sparite.
Bioclasts
Bioclasts are fragments of dead sea creatures. These include shells (Figure 2) and corals.The creatures precipitate the carbonate in order to produce some kind of structure.
F igure 2: A bioclastic limestone. Here the bioclasts are bivalves of Carboniferous age.
Ooids
Ooids are rounded grains formed by precipitation of calcite around a nucleus to produceconcentric circles (Figure 3). They form in warm, shallow waters, with a strong tidal
currents. Wave action may also contribute to their near-spherical shape.
F igure 3: The structure of an ooid. Redrawn from Tucker and Wright (1990).
Peloids
Peloids are sand sized grains (100-150 micrometers) of micro-crystalline carbonate. They
are generally rounded or sub-rounded. They originate from fecal pellets, algae and mud
7/28/2019 clastic sedimentology.docx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/clastic-sedimentologydocx 3/13
clasts. They are sometimes found clumped together, in a formation known as a
grapestone.
Intraclasts
Intraclasts are clast of other limestone that appear in younger limestones. They can bequite difficult to distinguish at times, as they may be made of a similar rock as that which
encases it. For example, hardgrounds can from when sea water flows through carbonatesediment, lithifying it rapidly. Subsequently, the hardground may be broken up andincorporated into the surrounding sediment.
Micrite
Micrite is microcystalline carbonate mud, with grains less than 4 micrometers.
Sparite
Sparite is coarser than micrite, with a grain size of more than 4 micrometers and is
crystalline.
Both micrite and sparite form the matrix or cement in carbonate rocks.
GRAIN COMPOSITION
There are two primary categories for the classification of carbonate grains: Non-Skeletal andSkeletal. Non-Skeletal grains can be entirely abiotically formed as in the case of coated grains,
grain aggregates and clasts, or both abiotically and biotically formed as in the case of peloids.
Within the Trenton limestone, however, the majority of readily observable sedimentary grains
are produced directly from the disarticulation and fragmentation of skeletal hard parts and areconsidered skeletal grains.
o Non-skeletal grains
non-skeletal grains can be produced either abiotically or biotically and can be classifiedinto one of the following four categories: coated grains, as in the case of ooids and
pisoids; grain aggregates, as in cemented groups or clusters of carbonate grains; clasts,
such as lithified pieces of previously formed carbonate rocks; or peloids, which are any
number of sand-sized, microcrystalline and often structureless carbonate grains.
Skeletal grains
By far the most-dominant carbonate grain type in the Trenton Limestone, skeletal
fragments from echinoderms, arthropods such as trilobites and ostracodes, bryozoans,
brachiopods, molluscs, sponges etc. make up significant portions of these limestones. Thetaphonomy or state of preservation of these fossil types helps to constrain the range of
depositional processes under which these carbonate grain producing organisms were
subjected after their death and leading up to their final burial.
MATRIX COMPOSITION
7/28/2019 clastic sedimentology.docx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/clastic-sedimentologydocx 4/13
The next major category to consider when discriminating carbonate rocks such as the Trenton
Limestone, is matrix classification. This category focuses on the sedimentary material, or lack
thereof, found between grains within a rock. Generally sediments are classified as either grain-supported, where granular materials with readily observable size and shape dominate the rock, or
as matrix-supported where the material is generally too small to be distinguished as a grain.
o Matrix supported
In this case, matrix materials usually consist of microcrystalline or cryptocrystalline
carbonate sediments. These textural descriptors indicate that the crystal size and shape
is too small to be readily observable without the use of a petrographic microscope and
polished thin-sections.
As the compositional discrimination of matrices is highly-dependent ondiagenetic effects and requires microscopic analysis, matrix classifications of the
Trenton limestones is not a focus of the discussion here. One must, however, note
the presence or absence of matrix within a rock.
o Grain-supported
In the case of grain-supported carbonate rocks, this classification is used to define the
dominance of visible sedimentary grains within a limestone. Due to their large
concentration relative to cryptocrystalline grains, individual silt to sand-sized particles or larger grains are more likely to be in direct contact with one another. Thus in a grain-
supported limestone, there is a general lack of fine-grained micrite and larger carbonate
grains compose the majority of the rock framework.
CEMENTS
Although once sedimentary carbonate grains are deposited, their final transition to rock
represents an additional process that needs to be at least considered in the classification of most
limestones. The cementation of carbonate grains is generally a very complicated process andoccurs along several diagenetic pathways depending upon the environment of cementation, on
the specific mineralogic composition of the carbonate grains themselves, and the mineralogic
composition of fluids that flow through the sedimentary mass. The discussion here is only to briefly present the general desciption of cement types for classification purposes.
Classification
There are two main methods of classifying carbonate rocks; Dunham's and Folk's classification.
Below is Dunham's classification which uses the texture of the rock to classify the carbonate.
Dunham's classification is useful for field work.
7/28/2019 clastic sedimentology.docx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/clastic-sedimentologydocx 5/13
CARBONATE ROCK CLASSIFICATION
Throughout the last half-century, studies of modern carbonate depositional environments and
their grain compositions and size distribution ranges have led to multiple classification schemesfor carbonate rocks. Such studies have used modern textural classifications such as grain size,
sorting, rounding, and grain composition and cement/matrix proportions to standardize thedescription of both modern and ancient carbonate rocks. These classification schemes, althoughslightly different in their nomenclatural development, remain very similar in their overall useage.
The most commonly used classification systems are either based on grainsize analysis or on theclassifications of Folk (1962), or Dunham (1962), where both focus on textural characteristics of
carbonate rocks. The following discussion will briefly introduce the conceptual usage of bothclassification schemes. Note that the intention of this discussion is to provide enough background
for the reader to understand the lithologic classification of the Trenton Limestones. For a more
detailed discussion of these classification systems, the reader is encouraged to review the
bibliography section of this webpage and select the pertinent references for more information.
o Grain-Size Classification
As is common in most sedimentary rocks, carbonate rocks can be classified according to the
dominant grain size in the rock. Using this classification requires that the grain-size be estimated
or measured exactly and then applied to a size-range chart for the establishment of a rock term.
A carbonate rock is usually classified in one of three main categories: calcilutite (those rocks
where the grain-size is 62 micrometers or smaller); calcarenite (those rocks where the grain-size
is between 62 micrometers and 2 millimeters); and calcirudite (those rocks where the grain-size
is greater than 2 millimeters).
The main strength of this classification system is to suggest a general association betweengrain-size, grain-sorting and deposition energy, however this system is most often limitedfor the description of most limestones.
o Folk Classification
As mentioned previously, the classification system of Folk (1959, 1962) relies mainly on textural
characteristics of limestones and carbonate sediments. Folk, recognizing the three maincompositional categories of carbonate rocks: grain composition, matrix composition, and cement
composition, suggested that a carbonate rock classification should encompass aspects of all of
these characteristics when trying to establish a rock name. The figure to the right shows Folk's
nomenclatural system using: grain types (he referred to them as "allochems"); matrix; andcements. In this scheme Folk uses the allochem types (shown in purple) as the prefix, and the
dominant matrix or cement composition as the suffix. For example, for a rock that contains a
micritic matrix and skeletal fragments, the associated name would be biomicrite.
Folk's nomenclatural system provides a rough framework for the naming of rock types, but he further
established that the range of matrix to cement occurs along a continuum from 0% matrix and 100%
cement or spar, through 100% matrix and 0% spar. To further differentiate rocks showing different
7/28/2019 clastic sedimentology.docx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/clastic-sedimentologydocx 6/13
relative proportions of micrite and spar, he constructed the following diagram to relate the relative
ratios of each to textural categories. In this later scheme shown below, Folk introduces the percent
allochems, and degree of sorting, rounding and abrasion (shown in red) to name specific carbonate rock
types. In this classification system, he has added prefix modifiers to establish more refined rock names
(shown in blue). For example, if a limestone was shown to be dominantly of micritic matrix with
approximately 40 % of the mass of the rock composed of ooids, Folk would have applied the name
sparse oomicrite to communicate the rock's composition.
Dunham Classification
In an alternative scheme to that of Folk, Dunham (1962) proposed a similar carbonate rock classification
system utilizing some of the same principles used by Folk. In Dunham's nomenclature, he looked first at
textural considerations of a rock including whether texture was recognizable in the rock. He then looked
to see whether sedimentary materials were somehow bound as part of the depositional process. He was
interested in separating those rock types where biologic activity had trapped sedimentary materials, as
in the case of stromatolites. In his hierarchy, once the basic textural categories were assigned, he then
looked at the relative proportion of mud in the sample. If the rock had no mud and was dominated by
coarse-grained sediments, he classified these rocks as grainstones. However, if the sample containedany amount of mud it was then considered in percent relative to the number of grains. In this way, he
was designated mudstones as having less than 10% grains, wackestones with more than 10% grains but
less than the amount required to support the rock, and packstones where the sedimentary grains
supported the rock framework but still had appreciable quantities of mud. Dunham's rock names are
shown in blue below
Recognizable Depositional Texture Crystalline
Components not bound together Originalcomponents
boundtogether
Crystalline
Carbonate
Contains Mud Lacks mudand is grain
supported
Boundstone
Mud Supported GrainSupported
GrainStone
<10%
grains
>10% grains
Packstone
7/28/2019 clastic sedimentology.docx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/clastic-sedimentologydocx 7/13
Mudstone Wackestone
Folk's classification is very useful for carbonates in thin section. It classifies carbonates based on
their components (see above) and the matrix/cement binding the components together.
Clasts
Interclast material
Micrite Sparite
Fossils Biomicrite Biosparite
Ooids Oomicrite Oosparite
Peloids Pelmicrite Pelsparite
Intraclasts Intramicrite Intrasparite
Conclusion
Carbonate rock are sedimentary rocks from from calcium carbonate, CaC0 3. Calcium carbonateis either the mineral aragonite, high magnesium carbonate or low magnesium carbonate. Only
low magnesium carbonate is stable at surface pressures and temperatures, but most modern
carbonate is aragonite. Carbonates are formed from various components, which include ooids,
peloids, clasts and biological remnants. Carbonates are classified by either Folk's or Dunham'sclassification schemes.
References
M. E. Tucker and P. Wright, 1990. Carbonate Sedimentology. Buy It.
Tags:
Introductory
Text
Sedimentary
7/28/2019 clastic sedimentology.docx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/clastic-sedimentologydocx 8/13
7/28/2019 clastic sedimentology.docx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/clastic-sedimentologydocx 9/13
7/28/2019 clastic sedimentology.docx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/clastic-sedimentologydocx 10/13
7/28/2019 clastic sedimentology.docx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/clastic-sedimentologydocx 11/13
7/28/2019 clastic sedimentology.docx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/clastic-sedimentologydocx 12/13
7/28/2019 clastic sedimentology.docx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/clastic-sedimentologydocx 13/13