8
Classical and Novel Directions in Neurotrophin Transport and Research: Anterograde Transport of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor by Sensory Neurons JAMES R. TONRA* Millennium BioTherapeutics, Cambridge, Massachusetts KEY WORDS pain; inflammation; axotomy; CGRP; BDNF; NGF; DRG ABSTRACT After the discovery of nerve growth factor, a classic model of neurotrophin action was developed. In this model, nerve endings compete for limited quantities of neurotrophic factors produced in neuronal target tissues. Neurotrophins are bound with high-affinity receptors ex- pressed on the neuronal membrane and then endocytosed and retrogradely transported back to the cell body of responsive neurons. This classic model of target derived trophic support has been utilized to explain a wide range of trophic actions including effects on neuronal survival, terminal branching, and protein expression. However, a number of recent findings in the field of neurotrophin research cannot be explained using the classic model. In the peripheral nervous system (PNS), sensory neurons have been shown to contain mRNA for a member of the neurotrophin family, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Sensory neurons do not receive synaptic input so neurotrophin production by these cells does not fit into the classic target derived model. In contrast to target derived trophic support, BDNF produced by sensory neurons provides local autocrine and paracrine neurotrophic support in vitro. Furthermore, in vivo, sensory neurons transport BDNF in the anterograde direction away from the cell body, and opposite to the retrograde direction utilized in the classic model. Thus, out of necessity, a new direction for neurotrophin research has developed to study the production and anterograde transport of neurotrophins. The importance of this new mode of neurotrophin action in the PNS is indicated by results that implicate it in the response to pain, inflammation, and nerve injury. Microsc. Res. Tech. 45:225–232, 1999. r 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc. INTRODUCTION The peripheral nervous system (PNS) is frequently used as a model to study the role of neuronal targets and the effects of axotomy because of the accesibility of the targets and axons of motor, sensory, and autonomic neurons. In the 1940s, through studies of motor and sensory neurons in the PNS, Levi-Montalcini and col- leagues demonstrated that limb bud excision in chick embryos results in a dramatic loss of sensory neurons in the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) associated with an increase in the number of degenerating neuronal pro- files (Hamburger, 1993; Levi-Montalcini, 1987). These results lead to the proposal that neuronal survival is regulated by the tissues that neurons innervate. Using mouse sarcoma grafts that become innervated by sen- sory and sympathetic neurons, but not motor neurons, after implantation into the body wall of chick embryos (Bueker, 1948; Levi-Montalcini and Hamburger, 1951), it became clear that diffusible factor(s) located in certain tissues are responsible for the trophic effects of innervated tissues. This conclusion was based on the finding that the sarcoma induced a generalized hyper- trophy of the sympathetic nervous system when it was in contact with the embryo directly or only through the circulation (Levi-Montalcini and Hamburger, 1953). The search for these diffusible factor(s) culminated in the discovery of the protein nerve growth factor (NGF), which was purified from mouse submaxillary salivary glands (Cohen, 1960). NGF was subsequently shown to act as an endogenous survival factor in vivo by demon- strating the dramatic sympathetic neuronal loss and ganglionic atrophy in newborn mice after sequestration of endogenous NGF with an anti-sera raised against this antigen (anti-NGF) (Cohen, 1960; Levi-Montalcini and Angeletti, 1966). This effect is dramatic enough that atrophy of sympathetic ganglion can be used as an easily measured positive control when treating animals with anti-NGF (Fig. 1) (Urschel and Hulsebosch, 1990; Tonra and Mendell, 1998). Further research into the mechanism of action for NGF resulted in the demonstra- tion of additional trophic actions and the development of a now classical model for NGF action. In this model, NGF is produced in neuronal target tissues where it is bound and endocytosed by the axonal processes and terminal branches of responsive neuronal populations, and then transported retrogradely to the cell soma. TARGET DERIVED MODEL OF NEUROTROPHIN ACTION NGF mRNA and protein are found in the targets of sympathetic and sensory neurons, but at very low Contract grant sponsor: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Contract grant sponsor: NIH; Contract grant numbers: R01-NS32264, P01-NS14899, R01- NS16996. *Correspondence to: James R. Tonra, Ph.D., Millennium BioTherapeutics, 620 Memorial Drive, Cambridge, MA 02139. Received 1 October 1998; accepted in revised form 1 December 1998 MICROSCOPY RESEARCH AND TECHNIQUE 45:225–232 (1999) r 1999 WILEY-LISS, INC.

Classical and novel directions in neurotrophin transport and research: Anterograde transport of brain-derived neurotrophic factor by sensory neurons

  • Upload
    james-r

  • View
    214

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Classical and novel directions in neurotrophin transport and research: Anterograde transport of brain-derived neurotrophic factor by sensory neurons

Classical and Novel Directions in Neurotrophin Transport andResearch: Anterograde Transport of Brain-DerivedNeurotrophic Factor by Sensory NeuronsJAMES R. TONRA*Millennium BioTherapeutics, Cambridge, Massachusetts

KEY WORDS pain; inflammation; axotomy; CGRP; BDNF; NGF; DRG

ABSTRACT After the discovery of nerve growth factor, a classic model of neurotrophin actionwas developed. In this model, nerve endings compete for limited quantities of neurotrophic factorsproduced in neuronal target tissues. Neurotrophins are bound with high-affinity receptors ex-pressed on the neuronal membrane and then endocytosed and retrogradely transported back to thecell body of responsive neurons. This classic model of target derived trophic support has beenutilized to explain a wide range of trophic actions including effects on neuronal survival, terminalbranching, and protein expression. However, a number of recent findings in the field of neurotrophinresearch cannot be explained using the classic model. In the peripheral nervous system (PNS),sensory neurons have been shown to contain mRNA for a member of the neurotrophin family,brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Sensory neurons do not receive synaptic input soneurotrophin production by these cells does not fit into the classic target derived model. In contrastto target derived trophic support, BDNF produced by sensory neurons provides local autocrine andparacrine neurotrophic support in vitro. Furthermore, in vivo, sensory neurons transport BDNF inthe anterograde direction away from the cell body, and opposite to the retrograde direction utilizedin the classic model. Thus, out of necessity, a new direction for neurotrophin research has developedto study the production and anterograde transport of neurotrophins. The importance of this newmode of neurotrophin action in the PNS is indicated by results that implicate it in the response topain, inflammation, and nerve injury. Microsc. Res. Tech. 45:225–232, 1999. r 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

INTRODUCTIONThe peripheral nervous system (PNS) is frequently

used as a model to study the role of neuronal targetsand the effects of axotomy because of the accesibility ofthe targets and axons of motor, sensory, and autonomicneurons. In the 1940s, through studies of motor andsensory neurons in the PNS, Levi-Montalcini and col-leagues demonstrated that limb bud excision in chickembryos results in a dramatic loss of sensory neuronsin the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) associated with anincrease in the number of degenerating neuronal pro-files (Hamburger, 1993; Levi-Montalcini, 1987). Theseresults lead to the proposal that neuronal survival isregulated by the tissues that neurons innervate. Usingmouse sarcoma grafts that become innervated by sen-sory and sympathetic neurons, but not motor neurons,after implantation into the body wall of chick embryos(Bueker, 1948; Levi-Montalcini and Hamburger, 1951),it became clear that diffusible factor(s) located incertain tissues are responsible for the trophic effects ofinnervated tissues. This conclusion was based on thefinding that the sarcoma induced a generalized hyper-trophy of the sympathetic nervous system when it wasin contact with the embryo directly or only through thecirculation (Levi-Montalcini and Hamburger, 1953).

The search for these diffusible factor(s) culminated inthe discovery of the protein nerve growth factor (NGF),which was purified from mouse submaxillary salivaryglands (Cohen, 1960). NGF was subsequently shown to

act as an endogenous survival factor in vivo by demon-strating the dramatic sympathetic neuronal loss andganglionic atrophy in newborn mice after sequestrationof endogenous NGF with an anti-sera raised againstthis antigen (anti-NGF) (Cohen, 1960; Levi-Montalciniand Angeletti, 1966). This effect is dramatic enoughthat atrophy of sympathetic ganglion can be used as aneasily measured positive control when treating animalswith anti-NGF (Fig. 1) (Urschel and Hulsebosch, 1990;Tonra and Mendell, 1998). Further research into themechanism of action for NGF resulted in the demonstra-tion of additional trophic actions and the developmentof a now classical model for NGF action. In this model,NGF is produced in neuronal target tissues where it isbound and endocytosed by the axonal processes andterminal branches of responsive neuronal populations,and then transported retrogradely to the cell soma.

TARGET DERIVED MODEL OFNEUROTROPHIN ACTION

NGF mRNA and protein are found in the targets ofsympathetic and sensory neurons, but at very low

Contract grant sponsor: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Contract grantsponsor: NIH; Contract grant numbers: R01-NS32264, P01-NS14899, R01-NS16996.

*Correspondence to: James R. Tonra, Ph.D., Millennium BioTherapeutics, 620Memorial Drive, Cambridge, MA 02139.

Received 1 October 1998; accepted in revised form 1 December 1998

MICROSCOPY RESEARCH AND TECHNIQUE 45:225–232 (1999)

r 1999 WILEY-LISS, INC.

Page 2: Classical and novel directions in neurotrophin transport and research: Anterograde transport of brain-derived neurotrophic factor by sensory neurons

levels (Davies et al., 1987; Heumann et al., 1984a;Shelton and Reichardt, 1984; Wheeler and Bothwell,1992). By limiting neurotrophic support, innervatedtissues establish a competitive environment that sculptsthe neural innervation of the tissue. NGF can affectneural innervation through effects on the survival (seebelow) and terminal branching (Campenot, 1987; Dia-mond et al., 1992a,b; Kimpinski et al., 1997; Yasuda etal., 1990) of innervating neurons. Thus, NGF depriva-tion through treatment with anti-NGF in neonatal rats(Goedert et al., 1984; Levi-Montalcini and Angeletti,1966; Ritter et al., 1991; Yip et al., 1984) or autoimmu-nization to NGF in adult rats (Gorin and Johnson,1979, 1980), decreases neuronal survival and innerva-tion density (Hill et al., 1988). At normal levels of NGFproduction, trophic support is not maximal. This isillustrated by the ability of supranormal NGF to in-crease neuronal survival, innervation density, and ter-minal branching (Albers et al., 1994; Diamond et al.,1992a, b). Target tissues are, therefore, actively control-ling the extent of neuronal innervation through limitedproduction of neurotrophic factors, resulting in a posi-tive correlation between NGF mRNA levels and neuro-nal innervation density (Harper and Davies, 1990;Shelton and Reichardt, 1984). In addition to survivaland terminal branching, target derived neurotrophinscan regulate the protein expression (Miller et al., 1982;Verge et al., 1990) and somal size (Hendry 1977; Rich etal., 1984; Yasuda et al., 1990) of responsive neurons.

To gain access to the limited NGF supply, the firststep is the binding of target derived NGF with specificreceptors expressed on the membrane of responsiveneurons. Two transmembrane receptors for NGF havebeen described; p75 (Chao et al., 1986; Johnson, D. etal., 1986; Puma et al., 1983) and trkA (Kaplan et al.,1991; Loeb et al., 1991). The function of p75 is stillevolving (Bothwell, 1996; Chao et al., 1992; see below),but expression may increase the binding affinity ofNGF to trkA (Hempstead et al., 1991). Mice expressinga mutated form of p75 have a significant loss of sensoryinnervation of the foot pad although significant effects

on the NGF dependent sympathetic nervous system arenot observed (Lee et al., 1992). Sympathetic neuronsfrom mice lacking p75 respond normally to NGF in vitrowhile cutaneous sensory neurons have decreased sensi-tivity to NGF (Davies et al., 1993). Thus, p75 may beinvolved in increasing NGF sensitivity in certain neu-rons but it is not required for NGF signaling. Incontrast, animals lacking trkA exhibit a dramatic lossof both sensory and sympathetic neurons (Smeyne etal., 1994). In addition, in mutant rat pheochromocy-toma cells (PC12 cells) that have low trkA expressionand lack NGF responsiveness, transfection with trkAreturns the ability to bind NGF with high affinity andrespond to NGF by increasing neurite outgrowth, cellsize, and neuronal survival in serum-free medium(Loeb et al., 1991). Thus, binding to trkA is thought tobe critical for NGF action. Subsequent to binding, NGFis endocytosed.

NGF and activated trkA, indicated by NGF inducedphosphorylation, are endocytosed in NGF responsivePC-12 cells (Grimes et al., 1996). Since NGF injectedintracellularly does not mimick the effects of extracellu-lar NGF (Heumann et al., 1984b), the endocytosed andmembrane bound activated trk receptor may mediatethe effects of NGF treatment on cell survival andmorphology (Grimes et al., 1996). Some actions of NGFare rapid, occurring shortly after binding. In cultures ofsympathetic neurons from the superior cervical gan-glion (SCG) that have been deprived of trophic supportfor a period of time, NGF treatment causes morphologi-cal changes in growth cones just 30 seconds to 2minutes after addition (Seeley and Greene, 1983; Con-nolly et al., 1985). Furthermore, when SCG neurons aregrown so that individual neurons have processes ineach of three compartmentalized cultures, neurite ex-tension is only stimulated by NGF in the compartmentthat was exposed to the higher NGF concentration(Campenot, 1987), indicating local rather than distantaction. However, some actions of NGF are distant to thesite of binding. Results suggest that the signal for thisaction is carried by the retrograde transport of NGF,and possibly activated trkA, towards the neuronal cellbody.

Retrograde transport after endocytosis of NGF hasbeen demonstrated for both postganglionic sympatheticneurons (Hendry et al., 1974; Johnson et al., 1978) andDRG sensory neurons (Stoeckel et al., 1974) by inject-ing 125I labeled NGF into the anterior eye chamber orsubcutaneously into the forepaw, respectively. Intracel-lular accumulation of 125I-NGF was demonstrated ipsi-lateral, but not contralateral to the injection site andwas abolished by cutting the nerves from the ganglionto the target. After treatment with an intraocularlong-acting NGF preparation, only those postganglionicsympathetic neurons that retrogradely transported io-dinated NGF had increased somal size (Hendry, 1977),demonstrating that cells that retrogradely transportedNGF had a physiological response to NGF. A specificrole for retrograde transport of NGF, possibly as areceptor linked complex, is supported by the findingthat axotomy or colchicine treatment both inhibit theresponse of sympathetic neurons to subcutaneouslyinjected NGF, ipsilateral to the treatment (Paravicini etal., 1975). Thus, systemic NGF is less potent if retro-grade transport is blocked, even when direct access to

Fig. 1. Superior cervical ganglia (SCG) from adult rats (5 weeks ofage) treated from postnatal day 2–14 with normal rabbit serum (twoganglia on left) or rabbit serum raised against nerve growth factor(anti-NGF; two ganglia on right). SCGs were dissected and stained for2 minutes in cresyl violet. Anti-NGF treated SCGs are atrophied dueto neuronal death after sequestration of endogenous NGF by thetreatment. For details of the study see Tonra and Mendell (1998). X6.

226 J.R. TONRA

Page 3: Classical and novel directions in neurotrophin transport and research: Anterograde transport of brain-derived neurotrophic factor by sensory neurons

the cell body is equivalent, indicating that some of theeffects of neurotrophins are caused by retrogradelytransported compounds. NGF also stimulates the retro-grade transport of activated trkA (Ehlers et al., 1995),suggesting that the internalized NGF-trkA complex(Grimes et al., 1996) is a retrograde signal of targetderived trophic support.

Thus, NGF acts as a target derived trophic factorthrough binding, internalization, and retrograde trans-port. Targets of neurons in the PNS produce NGF inlimited amounts to determine cellular characteristicssuch as protein expression, somal size, terminal branch-ing, and survival (see above). These trophic effects onneurons resulted in the classification of NGF as aneurotrophin (Korsching, 1993). It was clear that addi-tional neurotrophins existed because embryonic sen-sory neurons could be supported by a factor in mediumand brain extracts that could be immunologically differ-entiated from NGF. These experiments lead to thepurification of brain derived neurotrophic factor (Bardeet al., 1982), the second member of a growing family ofproteins related to NGF (Rodriguez-Tebar et al., 1991).

BDNF AS A TARGET DERIVEDNEUROTROPHIN

The target derived model of neurotrophic support canalso be used to model the actions of BDNF on respon-sive neurons. BDNF is produced in peripheral targettissues of PNS neurons (Koliatsos et al., 1993; Schecter-son and Bothwell, 1992), and binds to both the pan-neurotrophin receptor, p75, and a specific tyrosinekinase receptor (trkB). BDNF selectivity for trkB (Ip etal., 1993; Squinto et al., 1991) may be imparted by thecoexpression of p75 in neuronal cells because trkA andtrkB are not as selective for a given neurotrophin ifexpressed alone in non-neuronal cells lacking p75(Meakin and Shooter, 1992). Subsequent to binding,BDNF is endocytosed and retrogradely transported tothe neuronal cell body (DiStefano et al., 1992; Koliatsoset al., 1993), possibly as a complex with activated trkB(Bhattacharyya et al., 1997). Justifying its classifica-tion as a neurotrophin, BDNF treatment has beenshown to reduce naturally occurring degeneration ofsensory neurons (Hofer and Barde, 1988) and increasethe survival of sensory and motor neurons after axotomy(Eriksson et al., 1994; Koliatsos et al., 1993; Vejsada etal., 1995;Yan et al., 1992). In addition, similar to NGF(Albers et al., 1994), BDNF enhances axonal regenera-tion of adult sensory neurons in vitro (Lindsay, 1988),and overexpression of BDNF in the target field ofpreganglionic sympathetic neurons expressing trkBincreases innervation density (Causing et al., 1997).Thus, BDNF is similar to NGF with regard to bothstructure and mode of action.

BDNF PRODUCTION BY NEURONSWith the target derived model widely accepted as the

mechanism of action for neurotrophins, it was surpris-ing to learn that sensory neurons in the DRG expressBDNF (Ernfors et al., 1990, 1993; Schecterson andBothwell, 1992; Zhang et al., 1994). Neurotrophinproduction by neurons is not novel and can fit into theclassic target derived model. For example, NGF isproduced by hippocampal neurons and is thought toserve as trophic support for innervating basal forebrain

cholinergic neurons (Ayer-LeLievre et al., 1988; Hefti,1986; Williams et al., 1986). However, DRG sensoryneurons do not receive synaptic contacts so BDNFproduced by these cells is not thought to serve as targetderived trophic support for an innervating neuronalpopulation. Since some sensory neurons are known toexpress trkB (McMahon et al., 1994; Schecterson andBothwell, 1992;) it was suggested that by producingBDNF sensory neurons were providing autocrine orparacrine trophic support to themselves or neighboringcells, respectively (Ernfors et al., 1990; Korsching,1993).

This possibility was supported in vitro utilizing adultrat DRG neurons that express BDNF (Acheson et al.,1995). Survival of adult sensory neurons is muchgreater than neonatal neurons after denervation in-duced target deprivation (Johnson, EM Jr. et al., 1986)or when cultured in vitro without exogenous growthfactors (Lindsay, 1988). When BDNF synthesis bysensory neurons is inhibited by incubation with anti-sense oligonucleotides to BDNF, neuronal survival isreduced by 35% showing that sensory neurons canprovide neurotrophic support for one another. Para-crine support of neighboring neurons can be consideredsimilar to the classical model where target cells supportneurons through nearby terminal branches. However,it was also shown that BDNF from sensory neuronsprovides autocrine neurotrophic support in vitro (Ache-son et al., 1995), which deviates dramatically from theclassic model. It has not been determined whetherBDNF is released and then bound by the same neuronor whether it is enclosed in organelles containing trkB,resulting in an intracellular BDNF-activated trkB com-plex. Nevertheless, this mechanism of action for neuro-trophins differs from the classic model in the pathwayutilized by BDNF to support the survival of a popula-tion of neurons.

ANTEROGRADE TRANSPORT OF BDNFThe production of BDNF by sensory neurons also

leads to the suggestion that sensory neurons mighttransport BDNF anterogradely towards the targets oftheir axonal processes (Ernfors et al., 1990) and in theopposite direction to retrograde transport used fortarget derived neurotrophic support. Anterograde trans-port of endogenous BDNF by sensory neurons wasverified in adult rats, and it was shown that BDNF istransported by sensory neurons towards both periph-eral and central targets (Zhou and Rush, 1996). BDNFimmunostaining in the central target of sensory neu-rons, the spinal cord, was observed in the superficialdorsal horn and was dramatically reduced by priorcrushing of the dorsal roots that contain the centralprojections of DRG neurons. Thus, anterogradely trans-ported BDNF was not simply released along the nerve,it was transported to the target (Zhou and Rush, 1996).BDNF immunostaining has also been localized to nervefibers and axons in the dermis and epidermis of skin(Michael et al., 1997). This suggests that peripherallytransported BDNF reaches the targets of sensoryneurons. Thus, in the peripheral nervous system BDNFis utilized as both a classical target derived neuro-trophin (see above), and an anterograde source ofneurotrophin to neuronal targets for as yet undeter-mined functions. Support for the anterograde transport

227BDNF ANTEROGRADE TRANSPORT BY SENSORY NEURONS

Page 4: Classical and novel directions in neurotrophin transport and research: Anterograde transport of brain-derived neurotrophic factor by sensory neurons

of BDNF and NT-3, but not NGF, in the central nervoussystem is also accumulating (see Altar and DiStefano,1998 and Conner et al., 1998 for review) so thismechanism of neurotrophin action may be common to anumber of neuronal systems.

Anterograde BDNF transport by sensory neurons isoccurring in the normal, untreated state since BDNFaccumulates at a ligation of the dorsal root or sciaticnerve on the same side as the cell body in otherwiseuntreated rats (Tonra et al., 1998; Zhou and Rush,1996). In addition, BDNF immunoreactivity in thespinal cord is diminished after cutting off the flow fromthe DRG by crushing the dorsal roots (Zhou and Rush,1996). However, the function of anterogradely trans-ported BDNF in the spinal cord and peripheral sensoryneuron targets is presently unknown. One means togain insight into function is to determine the type ofsensory stimuli recognized by the sensory neurons thatproduce and anterogradely transport BDNF. Sensoryneurons are often classified by cellular characteristicssuch as morphology and protein expression (Lawson,1992). For BDNF expressing neurons, data is availableon the protein content of the neurons, and it is throughthis colocalization data that inferences can be madeabout the function of some of the neurons that produceand anterogradely transport BDNF.

In the untreated condition, most BDNF expressingrat DRG neurons are trkA positive (Kashiba et al.,1997; Michael et al., 1997). In addition, both BDNF(Michael et al., 1997) and trkA (Averill et al., 1995)immunoreactivity in the spinal cord are heaviest inlaminae I and II of the dorsal horn, and both aredramatically reduced by dorsal rhizotomy (Averill et al.,1995; Zhou and Rush, 1996). TrkA expressing DRGsensory neurons are thought to be involved in sensingand transmitting painful stimuli. Loss of trkA positive,NGF responsive DRG neurons through anti-NGF treat-ment (Carroll et al., 1992; Gorin and Johnson, 1979) orknockout of trkA results in a blunted or absent responseto noxious mechanical or thermal stimuli (Smeyne etal., 1994; Urschel et al., 1991). Since BDNF is alsopresent in these cells, anterogradely transported BDNFmay be involved in the sensation or transmission ofpain (Altar and DiStefano, 1998).

In sensory neurons, BDNF also colocalizes withCGRP, another anterogradely transported protein. Thegreat majority of sensory neurons that bind NGF withhigh affinity (Verge et al., 1989) and express trkA(Averill et al., 1995; Verge et al., 1992) also expresscalcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), supporting thecolocalization of BDNF, trkA, and CGRP in some sen-sory neurons (see above). Similar to BDNF, CGRP hasbeen implicated in pain sensation and the peripheralresponse to painful stimuli because of its colocalizationwith trkA. However, in addition to this colocalizationdata, CGRP excites dorsal horn neurons involved in thetransmission of nociceptive stimuli (Biella et al., 1991;Miletic and Tan, 1988; Ryu et al., 1988). Furthermore,the anterograde transport of CGRP to the peripheraltargets such as skin has been implicated in the vasodi-lation caused by stimulation of pain sensing unmyelin-ated and thinly myelinated axons (Brain et al., 1985;Janig and Lisney, 1989; Delay-Goyet et al., 1992).

Assigning a function to anterogradely transportedBDNF in the response to painful stimuli is at a more

preliminary stage than CGRP. One possibility is thatBDNF provides trophic support to trkB expressing cellsin the targets. Motoneurons and sensory neurons areknown to express trkB (Koliatsos et al., 1993; McMahonet al., 1994; Schecterson and Bothwell, 1992) so sensoryneurons could be supporting these cells to some extentat the level of the nerve or axon terminal field. BDNF,like CGRP, may also play a role in synaptic transmis-sion of sensory stimuli in the spinal cord. In thehippocampus, BDNF has been shown to increase synap-tic responses to afferent stimulation (Figurov et al.,1996; Kang and Schuman, 1995; Song et al., 1998).Similar effects are also reported in the visual cortexwhere BDNF increased excitatory postsynaptic cur-rents (Carmignoto et al., 1997) and facilitated theinduction of long-term potentiation after low-frequencytetanus (Huber et al., 1998). BDNF is localized to densecore vesicles in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord(Michael et al., 1997) so it could also be released uponsynaptic activation (Griesbeck et al., 1999) to play arole in transmission of sensory stimuli. Interestingly,BDNF affects neuromuscular transmission during de-velopment (Lohof et al., 1993; Wang et al., 1995), so ifBDNF is anterogradely transported to muscle, it couldplay a role in synaptic transmission in the periphery aswell.

ROLE IN INFLAMMATIONAdditional roles for anterogradely transported BDNF

are suggested by reports of treatments that regulateBDNF production by sensory neurons. In particular,inflammation induced by subcutaneous injection ofcomplete Freund’s adjuvant into the hindpaw causes anupregulation of BDNF immunoreactivity in DRG sen-sory neurons (Cho et al., 1997). Increased BDNF insensory neurons after inflammation is associated withan increase in BDNF immunoreactivity in the spinalcord dorsal horn, indicating that the increased BDNFproduced in the DRG in response to inflammation isanterogradely transported to sensory neuron targets.BDNF is being regulated by inflammation in parallelwith the regulation of CGRP and Substance P produc-tion and anterograde transport by sensory neurons(Donnerer et al., 1992; Leslie et al., 1995).

The changes in BDNF (Cho et al., 1997), CGRP andSubstance P (Donnerer et al., 1992; Leslie et al., 1995)after inflammation can all be prevented by sequestra-tion of the excess NGF produced in inflamed tissue(Donnerer et al., 1992) with anti-NGF. Thus, NGF isthought to regulate the expression and transport ofthese proteins by sensory neurons. In support of this,NGF treatment increases BDNF in trkA positive DRGneurons and their projections into the spinal corddorsal horn (Apfel et al., 1996; Michael et al., 1997).NGF also increases BDNF accumulation on the side of asciatic nerve ligature closest to the neuronal cell body(Michael et al., 1997), supporting an upregulation ofBDNF anterograde transport into the periphery. Simi-lar to the effects on BDNF, NGF treatment increasesCGRP and Substance P in the sciatic nerve (Donnereret. al., 1992), and Substance P in the DRG (Leslie et al.,1995).

The regulation of the production and transport ofCGRP and Substance P after treatment with completeFreund’s adjuvant supports their involvement in the

228 J.R. TONRA

Page 5: Classical and novel directions in neurotrophin transport and research: Anterograde transport of brain-derived neurotrophic factor by sensory neurons

response to inflammation. Furthermore, the vasodilata-tion and plasma extravasation observed in inflamedtissue has been related to the release of CGRP andSubstance P by sensory neurons (Delay-Goyet et al.,1992; Green et al., 1992; Kenins et al., 1984; Louis etal., 1989). Inflammation also results in reduced painthresholds and increased excitability of dorsal hornneurons receiving synaptic input from sensory neurons(Ma and Woolf, 1996; Menetrey and Besson, 1982;Randich et al., 1997). These changes may be partiallyrelated to an increased release of CGRP and SubstanceP in the spinal cord resulting in excitatory effects on thesynaptic transmission of sensory information in thedorsal horn (Biella et al., 1991; Miletic and Tan, 1988;Ryu et al., 1988). BDNF could also be involved in theresponse to inflammation because BDNF productionand anterograde transport are regulated by inflamma-tion in the same manner as CGRP and Substance P. Inaddition, BDNF and CGRP are colocalized in DRGneurons and peripheral axonal processes indicatingthat they are produced and transported by many of thesame sensory neurons (Michael et al., 1997). The roleplayed by BDNF in inflammation remains unclear buteffects on synaptic transmission are possible (see above).Additionally, BDNF has been shown to reduce tissuedamage in metabolically stressed muscle (Lian et al.,1998) so increased anterograde transport of BDNF mayserve as trophic support for damaged tissue.

ROLE IN RESPONSE TO DENERVATIONStudies on the regulation of anterograde transport of

BDNF have also suggested a role in the response toaxonal injury. Axotomy of the peripheral process ofsensory neurons through crush injury of the sciaticnerve increases BDNF mRNA and protein in ipsilateralDRG (Ernfors et al., 1993; Sebert and Shooter, 1993;Tonra et al., 1998). Increased BDNF expression bysensory neurons after axotomy is observed in associa-tion with an upregulation of anterograde transport by300% (Tonra et al., 1998). The response to axotomy is

not dependent on whether the central or peripheralsensory neuron process is damaged because rhizotomyalso causes an upregulation of BDNF mRNA in DRGneurons (Fig. 2) and increased anterograde transportinto the peripheral processes. However, there are differ-ences in the regulation of anterograde transport follow-ing either central or peripheral injury. BDNF antero-grade transport is elevated for at least 3 days afterrhizotomy, whereas transport is elevated at one dayafter a crush injury of the sciatic nerve but returns tonormal levels by 2 days post-injury. This suggests atransient role for increased anterograde transport ofBDNF at the site of peripheral axonal damage whenreinnervation of the distal stump is permitted (crushinjury).

In contrast to the parallel control of BDNF, CGRP,and Substance P during inflammation (see above),CGRP and Substance P production and anterogradetransport by DRG neurons were not affected by sciaticnerve crush (Tonra et al., 1998). NGF is upregulated inthe nerve at the site of nerve injury (Heumann et al.,1987a,b) so the upregulation of BDNF in the DRG aftercrush could be a response to NGF (Apfel et al., 1996;Michael et al., 1997). However, an increase in CGRPand Substance P expression would be expected if NGFtrophic support were increased (Donnerer et al., 1992;Leslie et al., 1995). This suggests that a differentstimulus exists for upregulation of BDNF in sensoryneurons in response to nerve injury. Preliminary find-ings that BDNF mRNA is increased in trkA, as well astrkB and trkC positive sensory neurons (Averill et al.,1997), support this possibility because NGF would notbe expected to affect trkB and trkC positive neurons (Ipet al., 1993).

In injured nerve, anterogradely transported BDNFmay function more as a classical neurotrophin, provid-ing trophic support to axotomized neurons that inner-vate the site of injury. BDNF treatment can havedramatic effects on axotomized sensory and motorneurons. In neonates, BDNF prevents or delays sensory

Fig. 2. In situ hybridization for BDNF mRNA in the fifth lumbardorsal root ganglion (DRG) ipsilateral or contralateral to a rhizotomyperformed one day earlier. Ganglia are from the same rat and areprocessed on the same slide. BDNF mRNA is dramatically increased inDRG sensory neurons whose axonal projections to the spinal cord werecut (ipsilateral), compared to neurons whose projections are left intact

(contralateral). Increased BDNF message was found to occur at thesame time that BDNF anterograde transport into the peripheralprojections of sensory neurons was increased, indicating a coordinatedupregulation in response to nerve injury. For a detailed description ofthe study see Tonra et al. (1998). X75.

229BDNF ANTEROGRADE TRANSPORT BY SENSORY NEURONS

Page 6: Classical and novel directions in neurotrophin transport and research: Anterograde transport of brain-derived neurotrophic factor by sensory neurons

and motor neuron death after sciatic nerve section(Eriksson et al., 1994; Yan et al., 1992). In adults,BDNF has been shown to attenuate the sciatic nervelesion-induced decrease of choline acetyltransferaseimmunoreactivity in motor neurons (Friedman et al.,1995). A trophic role for BDNF at the site of nerveinjury is also suggested by the dramatic increase insensory and motor neuron transport of 125I labeledBDNF from the site of nerve damage compared totransport from intact nerve (Curtis et al., 1998; Di-Stefano and Curtis, 1994). In addition to neurotrophiceffects, BDNF could affect Schwaan cell responses tonerve injury, acting through p75, which is expressed inincreasing amounts by these cells at the site of nerveinjury (Funakoshi et al., 1993). Effects on Schwaancells through p75 could include promoting cell deathand guiding cell migration (Anton et al., 1994; Casaccia-Bonnefil et al., 1996; Rabiazadeh et al., 1993).

CONCLUSIONFor the majority of published neurotrophin research,

the classic model of target derived neurotrophic supportserves as a successful framework to understand themechanism of action for neurotrophins. However, a newdirection in neurotrophin research, towards the studyof the anterograde transport of BDNF, has developedout of the inability to explain certain experimentalresults using the classic model. The peripheral nervoussystem is providing an accessible environment to studythe production and anterograde transport of neurotroph-ins by neurons, similar to its role in the development ofthe classic model. This was made possible by the findingthat sensory neurons are among the neuronal popula-tions recognized to be utilizing this novel mechanism ofaction. Although many details remain to be discovered,the production and anterograde transport of BDNF bysensory neurons has already been implicated in theresponse to pain, inflammation, and nerve injury. Thusthe understanding of anterograde transport of BDNFhas potential clinical importance and further researchwill uncover the specific role BDNF plays in thesepathological states.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTSI am grateful to Drs. Peter DiStefano and Lorne

Mendell for their significant contributions to my re-search.

REFERENCESAcheson A, Conover JC, Fandl JP, DeChiara TM, Russell M, Thadani

A, Squinto SP, Yancopoulos GD, Lindsay RM. 1995. A BDNFautocrine loop in adult sensory neurons prevents cell death. Nature374:450–453.

Albers KM, Wright DE, Davis BM. 1994. Overexpression of nervegrowth factor in epidermis of transgenic mice causes hypertrophy ofthe peripheral nervous system. J Neurosci 14:1422–1432.

Altar CA, DiStefano PS. 1998. Neurotrophin trafficking by antero-grade transport. Trends Neurosci 21:433–437.

Anton ES, Weskamp G, Reichardt LF, Matthew WD. 1994. Nervegrowth factor and its low-affinity receptor promote Schwann cellmigration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:2795–2799.

Apfel SC, Wright DE, Wiideman AM, Dormia C, Snider WD, KesslerJA. 1996. Nerve growth factor regulates the expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor mRNA in the peripheral nervous sys-tem. Mol Cell Neurosci 7:134–142.

Averill S, McMahon SB, Clary DO, Reichardt LF, Priestley JV. 1995.Immunocytochemical localization of trkA receptors in chemically

identified subgroups of adult rat sensory neurons. Eur J Neurosci7:1484–1494.

Averill S, Michael GJ, Shortland PJ, Priestley JV. 1997. BDNFincreases in large diameter dorsal root ganglion cells and in theircentral projections following peripheral axotomy. Soc Neurosci Abstr23:134.8.

Ayer-LeLievre C, Olson L, Ebendal T, Seiger A, Persson H. 1988.Expression of the b-nerve growth factor gene in hippocampalneurons. Science 240:1339–1341.

Barde Y-A, Edgar D, Thoenen H. 1982. Purification of a new neuro-trophic factor from mammalian brain. EMBO J 1:549–553.

Bhattacharyya A, Watson FL, Bradlee TA, Pomeroy SL, Stiles CD,Segal RA. 1997. Trk receptors function as rapid retrograde signalcarriers in the adult nervous system. J Neurosci 17:7007–7016.

Biella G, Panara C, Pecile A, Sotgiu ML. 1991. Facilitatory role ofcalcitonin gene-related peptied (CGRP) on excitation induced bySubstance P (SP) and noxious stimuli in rat spinal dorsal hornneurons. An iontophoretic study in vivo. Brain Res 559:352–356.

Bothwell M. 1996. p75NTR: A receptor after all. Science 272:506–507.Brain SD, Williams TJ, Tippins JR, Morris HR, MacIntyre I. 1985.

Calcitonin gene-related peptide is a potent vasodilator. Nature313:54–56.

Bueker ED. 1948. Implantation of tumors in the hind limb field ofembryonic chick and the developmental response of the lumbo-sacral nervous system. Anat Rec 102:368–390.

Campenot RB. 1987. Local control of neurite sprouting in culturedsympathetic neurons by nerve growth factor. Dev Brain Res 37:293–301.

Carmignoto G, Pizzorusso T, Tia S, Vicini S. 1997. Brain-derivedneurotrophic factor and nerve growth factor potentiate excitatorysynaptic transmission in the rat visual cortex. J Physiol 498:153–164.

Carroll SL, Silos-Santiago I, Frese SE, Ruit K, Milbrandt J, SniderWD. 1992. Dorsal root ganglion neurons expressing trk are selec-tively sensitive to NGF deprivation in utero. Neuron 9:779–788.

Casaccia-Bonnefil P, Carter BD, Dobrowsky RT, Chao MV. 1996. Deathof oligodenrocytes mediated by the interaction of nerve growthfactor with its receptor p75. Nature 383:716–719.

Causing CG, Gloster A, Aloyz R, Bamji SX, Chang E, Fawcett J,Kuchel G, Miller FD. 1997. Synaptic innervation density is regu-lated by neuron-derived BDNF. Neuron 18:257–267.

Chao MV, Bothwell MA, Ross AH, Koprowski H, Lanahan AA, BuckCR, Sehgal A. 1986. Gene transfer and molecular cloning of thehuman NGF receptor. Science 232:518–521.

Chao MV, Battleman DS, Benedetti M. 1992. Receptors for nervegrowth factor. Int Rev Cytol 137:169–180.

Cho H-J, Kim J-K, Zhou X-F, Rush RA. 1997. Increased brain-derivedneurotrophic factor immunoreactivity in rat dorsal root ganglia andspinal cord following peripheral inflammation. Brain Res 76f4:269–272.

Cohen S. 1960. Purification of a nerve-growth promoting protein fromthe mouse salivary gland and its neuro-cyotoxic antiserum. ProcNatl Acad Sci USA 46:302–311.

Conner JM, Lauterborn JC, Gall CM. 1998. Anterograde transport ofneurotrophin proteins in the CNS-A reassessment of the neuro-trophic hypothesis. Rev Neurosci 9:91–103.

Connolly JL, Seeley PJ, Greene LA. 1985. Regulation of growth conemorphology by nerve growth factor: A comparitive study by scanningelectron microscopy. J Neurosci Res 13:183–198.

Curtis R, Tonra JR, Stark JL, Adryan KM, Park JS, Cliffer KD,Lindsay RM, DiStefano PS. 1998. Neuronal injury increases retro-grade axonal transport of the neurotrophins to spinal sensoryneurons and motor neurons via multiple receptor mechanisms. MolCell Neurosci 12:105–118.

Davies AM, Bandtlow C, Heumann R, Korsching S, Rohrer H,Thoenen H. 1987. Timing and site of nerve growth factor synthesisin developing skin in relation to innervation and expression of thereceptor. Nature 326:353–358.

Davies AM, Lee J-F, Jaenisch R. 1993. p75-deficient trigeminalsensory neurons have an altered response to NGF but not to otherneurotrophins. Neuron 11:565–574.

Delay-Goyet P, Satoh H, Lundberg JM. 1992. Relative involvement ofSubstance P and CGRP mechanisms in antidromic vasodilation inthe rat skin. Acta Physiol Scand 146:537–538.

Diamond J, Holmes M, Coughlin M. 1992a. Endogenous NGF andnerve impulses regulate the collateral sprouting of sensory axons inthe skin of the adult rat. J Neurosci 12:1454–1466.

Diamond J, Gloster A, Kitchener P. 1992b. Regulation of sensoryinnervation of skin: trophic control of collateral sprouting. In:Sensory neurons: diversity, development, and plasticity. Scott SA,editor. New York: Oxford University Press. p 309–332.

230 J.R. TONRA

Page 7: Classical and novel directions in neurotrophin transport and research: Anterograde transport of brain-derived neurotrophic factor by sensory neurons

DiStefano PS, Curtis R. 1994. Receptor mediated retrograde axonaltransport of neurotrophic factors is increased after peripheral nerveinjury. Prog Brain Res 103:35–42.

DiStefano PS, Friedman B, Radziejewski C, Alexander C, Boland P,Schick CM, Lindsay RM, Wiegand SJ. 1992. The neurotrophinsBDNF NT–3, and NGF display distinct patterns of retrogradeaxonal transport in peripheral and central neurons. Neuron, 8:983–993.

Donnerer J, Schuligoi R, Stein C. 1992. Increased content andtransport of Substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide insensory nerves innervating inflamed tissue: Evidence for a regula-tory function of nerve growth factor in vivo. Neuroscience 49:693–698.

Ehlers MD, Kaplan DR, Price DL, Koliatsos VE. 1995. NGF-stimulated retrograde transport of trkA in the mammalian nervoussystem. J Cell Biol 130:149–156.

Eriksson NP, Lindsay RM, Aldskogius H. 1994. BDNF and NT–3rescue sensory but not motoneurones following axotomy in theneonate. NeuroReport 5:1445–1448.

Ernfors P, Wetmore C, Olson L, Persson H. 1990. Identification of cellsin rat brain and peripheral tissues expressing mRNA for members ofthe nerve growth factor family. Neuron 5:511–526.

Ernfors P, Rosario CM, Merlio J-P, Grant G, Aldskogius H, Persson H.1993. Expression of mRNAs for neurotrophin receptors in the dorsalroot ganglion and spinal cord during development and followingperipheral or central axotomy. Mol Brain Res 17:217–226.

Figurov A, Pozzo-Miller LD, Olafsson P, Wang T, Lu B. 1996. Regula-tion of synaptic responses to high-frequency stimulation and LTP byneurotrophins in the hippocampus. Nature 381:706–709.

Friedman B, Kleinfeld D, Ip NY, Verge VMK, Moulton R, Boland P,Zlotchenko E, Lindsay RM, Liu L. 1995. BDNF and NT–4/5 exertneurotrophic influences on injured adult spinal motor neurons. JNeurosci 15:1044–1056.

Funakoshi H, Frisen J, Barbany G, Timmusk T, Zachrisson O, VergeVMK, Persson H. 1993. Differential expression of mRNAs forneurotrophins and their receptors after axotomy of the sciatic nerve.J Cell Biol 123:455–465.

Goedert M, Otten U, Hunt SP, Bond A, Chapman D, Schlumpf M,Lichtensteiger W. 1984. Biochemical and anatomical effects ofantibodies against nerve growth factor on developing rat sensoryganglia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:1580–1584.

Gorin PD, Johnson EM. 1979. Experimental autoimmune model ofnerve growth factor deprivation: Effects on developing peripheralsympathetic and sensory neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 10:5382–5386.

Gorin PD, Johnson EM Jr. 1980. Effects of long-term nerve growthfactor deprivation on the nervous system of the adult rat: anexperimental autoimmune approach. Brain Res 198:27–42.

Green PG, Basbaum AI, Levine JD. 1992. Sensory neuropeptideinteractions in the production of plasma extravasation in the rat.Neuroscience 50:745–749.

Grimes ML, Zhou J, Beattie EC, Yuen EC, Hall DE, Valletta JS, ToppKS, LaVail JH, Bunnett NW, Mobley WC. 1996. Endocytosis ofactivated trkA: Evidence that nerve growth factor induces formationof signaling endosomes. J Neurosci 16:7950–7964.

Hamburger V. 1993. The history of the discovery of the nerve growthfactor. J Neurobiol 24:893–897.

Harper S, Davies AM. 1990. NGF mRNA expression in developingepithelium related to innervation densisty. Development 110:515–519.

Hefti F. 1986. Nerve growth factor promotes survival of septalcholinergic neurons after fimbrial transections. J Neurosci 6:2155–2162.

Hempstead BL, Martin-Zanca D, Kaplan DR, Parada LF, Chao MV.1991. High-affinity NGF binding requires coexpression of the trkproto-oncogene and the low-affinity NGF receptor. Nature 350:678–683.

Hendry IA. 1977. The effect of the retrograde axonal transport of nervegrowth factor on the morphology of adrenergic neurones. Brain Res134:213–223.

Hendry IA, Stockel K, Thoenen H, Iversen LL. 1974. The retrogradeaxonal transport of nerve growth factor. Brain Res 68:103–121.

Heumann R, Korsching S, Scott J, Thoenen H. 1984a. Relationshipbetween levels of nerve growth factor (NGF) and its messenger RNAin sympathetic ganglia and peripheral target tissues. EMBO J3:3183–3189.

Heumann R, Schwab M, Merkl R, Thoenen H. 1984b. Nerve growthfactor-mediated induction of choline acetyltransferase in PC12 cells:evaluation of the site of action of nerve growth factor and theinvolvement of lysosomal degradation products of nerve growthfactor. J Neurosci 4:3039–3050.

Heumann R, Korsching S, Bandtlow C, Thoenen H. 1987a. Changes ofnerve growth factor synthesis in nonneuronal cells in response tosciatic nerve transection. J Cell Biol 104:1623–1631.

Heumann R, Lindholm D, Bandtlow C, Meyer M, Radeke MJ, MiskoTP, Shooter E, Thoenen H. 1987. Differential regulation of mRNAencoding nerve growth factor and its receptor in rat sciatic nerveduring development, degeneration, and regeneration: role of macro-phages. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:8735–8739.

Hill CE, Jelinek H, Hendry IA, McLennan IS, Rush RA. 1988.Destruction by anti-NGF of autonomic, sudomotor neurones andsubsequent hyperinnervation of the foot pad by sensory fibres. JNeurosci Res 19:474–482.

Hofer MM, Barde Y-A. 1988. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor pre-vents neuronal death in vivo. Nature 331:261–262.

Huber KM, Sawtell NB, Bear MF. 1998. Brain-derived neurotrophicfactor alters the synaptic modification threshold in visual cortex.Neuropharmacology 37:571–579.

Ip NY, Stitt TN, Tapley P, Klein R, Glass DJ, Fandl J, Greene L A,Barbacid M, Yancopoulos GD. 1993. Similarities and differences inthe way neurotrophins interact with the trk receptors in neuronaland nonneuronal cells. Neuron 10:137–149.

Janig W, Lisney SJW. 1989. Small diameter myelinated afferentsproduce vasodilation but not plasma extravasation in rat skin. JPhysiol 415:477–486.

Johnson EM Jr., Andres RY, Bradshaw RA. 1978. Characterization ofthe retrograde transport of nerve growth factor (NGF) using highspecific activity [125I]NGF. Brain Res 150:319–331.

Johnson EM Jr, Rich KM, Yip HK. 1986. The role of NGF in sensoryneurons in vivo. Trends Neurosci 9:33–37.

Johnson D, Lanahan A, Buck CR, Sehgal A, Morgan C, Mercer E,Bothwell M, Chao M 1986. Expression and structure of the humanNGF receptor. Cell 47:545–554.

Kang H, Schuman EM. 1995. Long-lasting neurotrophin-inducedenhancement of synaptic transmission in the adult hippocampus.Science 267:1658–1662.

Kaplan DR, Hempstead BL, Martin-Zanca D, Chao MV, Parada LF.1991. The trk proto-oncogene product: a signal transducing receptorfor nerve growth factor. Science 252:554–558.

Kashiba H, Ueda Y, Ueyama T, Nemoto K, Senba E. 1997. Relationshipbetween BDNF- and trk-expressing neurones in rat dorsal rootganglion: an analysis by in situ hybridization. NeuroReport 8:1229–1234.

Kenins P, Hurley JV, Bell C.1984. The role of Substance P in the axonreflex in the rat. Br J Dermatol 111:551–559.

Kimpinski K, Campenot RB, Mearow K. 1997. Effects of the neurotroph-ins nerve growth factor, neurotrophin–3, and brain-derived neuro-trophic factor (BDNF) on neurite growth from adult sensory neuronsin compartmented cultures. J Neurobiol 33:395–410.

Koliatsos V.E, Clatterbuck RE, Winslow JW, Cayouette MH, Price DL.1993. Evidence that brain-derived neurotrophic factor is a trophicfactor for motor neurons in vivo. Neuron 10:359–367.

Korsching S. 1993. The neurotrophic factor concept: A reexamination.J. Neurosci, 13:2739–2748.

Lawson SN. 1992. Morphological and biochemical cell types of sensoryneurons. In: Scott SA, editor. Sensory neurons: diversity, develop-ment, and plasticity. New York: Oxford University Press. p 27–59.

Lee K-F, Li E, Huber LJ, Landis SC, Sharpe AH, Chao MV, Jaenisch R.1992. Targeted mutation of the gene encoding the low affinity NGFreceptor p75 leads to deficits in the peripheral sensory nervoussystem. Cell 69:737–749.

Leslie TA, Emson PC, Dowd PM, Woolf CJ. 1995. Nerve growth factorcontributes to the up-regulation of growth-associated protein 43 andpreprotachykinin A messenger RNAs in primary sensory neuronsfollowing peripheral inflammation. Neuroscience 67:753–761.

Levi-Montalcini R. 1987. The nerve growth factor 35 years later.Science 237:1154–1162.

Levi-Montalcini R,Angeletti PU. 1966. Immunosympathectomy. PharmRev 18:619–628.

Levi-Montalcini R, Hamburger V. 1951. Selective growth-stimulatingeffects of mouse sarcoma on the sensory and sympathetic nervoussystem of the chick embryo. J Exp Zool 116:321–361.

Levi-Montalcini R, Hamburger V. 1953. A diffusible agent of mousesarcoma, producing hyperplasia of sympathetic ganglia and hyper-neurotization of viscera in the chick embryo. J Exp Zool 123:233–287.

Lian JD, al-Jumah M, Cwik V, Brooke MH. 1998. Neurotrophic factorsdecrease the release of creatine kinase and prostaglandin E2 frommetabolically stressed muscle. Neuromusc Disord 8:7–13.

Lindsay RM. 1988. Nerve growth factors (NGF BDNF) enhance axonalregeneration but are not required for survival of adult sensoryneurons. J Neurosci 8:2394–2405.

231BDNF ANTEROGRADE TRANSPORT BY SENSORY NEURONS

Page 8: Classical and novel directions in neurotrophin transport and research: Anterograde transport of brain-derived neurotrophic factor by sensory neurons

Loeb DM, Maragos J, Dionisio M-Z, Chao MV, Parada LF, Greene LA.1991. The trk proto-oncogene rescues NGF responsiveness in mu-tant NGF-nonresponsive PC12 cell lines. Cell 66:961–966.

Lohof AM, Ip NY, Poo M. 1993. Potentiation of developing meuromus-cular synapses by the neurotrophins NT–3 and BDNF. Nature363:350–353.

Louis SM, Jamieson A, Russell NJW, Dockray GJ. 1989. The role ofsubstance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide in neurogenicplasma extravasation and vasodilatation in the rat. Neuroscience32:581–586.

Ma QP, Woolf CJ. 1996. Progressive tactile hypersensitivity: aninflammation-induced incremental increase in the excitability of thespinal cord. Pain 67:97–106.

McMahon SB, Armanini MP, Ling LH, Phillips HS. 1994. Expressionand coexpression of trk receptors in subpopulations of adult primarysensory neurons projecting to identified peripheral targets. Neuron12:1161–1171.

Meakin SO, Shooter EM. 1992. The nerve growth factor family ofreceptors. TINS 15:323–331.

Menetrey D, Besson JM. 1982. Electrophysiological characteristics ofdorsal horn cells in rats with cutaneous inflammation resulting fromchronic arthritis. Pain 13:343–364.

Michael GJ, Averill S, Nitkunan A, Rattray M, Bennett DLH, Yan Q,Priestley JV. 1997. Nerve growth factor treatment increases brain-derived neurotrophic factor selectively in trkA-expressiong dorsalroot ganglion cells and in their central terminations within thespinal cord. J Neurosci 17:8476–8490.

Miletic V, Tan H. 1988. Iontophoretic application of calcitonin gene-related peptide produces a slow and prolonged excitation of neuronsin the cat lumbar dorsal horn. Brain Res 446:169–172.

Miller MS, Buck SH, Sipes IG, Yamamura HI, Burks TF. 1982.Regulation of Substance P by nerve growth factor: disruption bycapsaicin. Brain Res 250:193–196.

Paravicini U, Stoeckel K, Thoenen H. 1975. Biological importance ofretrograde axonal transport of nerve growth factor in adrenergicneurons. Brain Res 84:279–291.

Puma P, Buxser SE, Watson L, Kelleher DJ, Johnson GL. 1983.Purification of the receptor for nerve growth factor from A875melanoma cells by affinity chromatography. J Biol Chem 258:33709–3375.

Rabizadeh S, Oh J, Zhong LT, Yang J, Bitler CM, Butcher LL,Bredesen DE. 1993. Induction of apoptosis by the low-affinity NGFreceptor. Science 261:345–348.

Randich A, Meller ST, Gebhart GF. 1997. Responses of primaryafferents and spinal dorsal horn neurons to thermal and mechanicalstimuli before and during zymosan-induced inflammation of the rathindpaw. Brain Res 772:135–148.

Rich KM, Yip HK, Osborne PA, Schmidt RE, Johnson EM Jr. 1984.Role of nerve growth factor in the adult dorsal root ganglia neuronand its response to injury. J Comp Neurol 230:110–118.

Ritter AM, Lewin GR, Kremer NE, Mendell LM. 1991. Requirementfor nerve growth factor in the development of myelinated nocicep-tors in vivo. Nature 350:500–502.

Rodriguez-Tebar A, Dechant G, Barde Y-A. 1991. Neurotrophins:structural relatedness and receptor interactions. Phil Trans R SocLond B Biol Sci 331:255–258.

Ryu PD, Gerber G, Murase K, Randic M. 1988. Actions of calcitoningene-related peptide on rat spinal dorsal horn neurons. Brain Res441:357–361.

Schecterson LC, Bothwell M. 1992. Novel roles for neurotrophins aresuggested by BDNF and NT–3 mRNA expression in developingneurons. Neuron 9:449–463.

Shelton DL, Reichardt LF. 1984. Expression of the b-nerve growthfactor gene correlates with the density of sympathetic innervation ineffector organs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:7951–7955.

Sebert ME, Shooter EM. 1993. Expression of mRNA for neurotrophicfactors and their receptors in the rat dorsal root ganglion and sciaticnerve following nerve injury. J Neurosci Res 36:357–367.

Seeley PJ, Greene LA. 1983. Short-latency local actions of nervegrowth factor at the growth cone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80:2789–2793.

Smeyne RJ, Klein R, Schnapp A, Long LK, Bryant S, Lewin A, Lira SA,Barbacid M. 1994. Severe sensory and sympathetic neuropathies inmice carrying a disrupted trk/NGF receptor gene. Nature 368:246–249.

Song D-K, Choe B, Bae JH, Park WK, Han IS, Ho W-K, Earm YE.1998. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor rapidly potentiates synap-tic transmission through NMDA, but suppresses it through non-NMDA receptors in rat hippocampal neuron. Brain Res 799:176–179.

Squinto SP, Stitt TN, Aldrich TH, Davis S, Bianco SM, Radziejewski C,Glass DJ, Masiakowski P, Furth ME, Valenzuela DM, DiStefano PS,Yancopoulos GD. 1991. trkB encodes a functional receptor forbrain-derived neurotrophic factor and neurotrophin–3 but not nervegrowth factor. Cell 65:885–893.

Stoeckel K, Schwab M, Thoenen H. 1975. Specificity of retrogradetransport of nerve growth factor (NGF) in sensory neurons: abiochemical and morphological study. Brain Res 89:1–14.

Tonra JR, Mendell LM. 1998. Effects of postnatal anti-NGF on thedevelopment of CGRP-IR neurons in the dorsal root ganglion. JComp Neurol 392:489–498.

Tonra JR, Curtis R, Wong V, Cliffer KD, Park JS, Timmes A, Nguyen T,Lindsay RM, Acheson A, DiStefano PS. 1998. Axotomy upregulatesthe anterograde transport and expression of brain-derived neuro-trophic factor by sensory neurons. J Neurosci 18:4374–4383.

Urschel BA, Hulsebosch CE. 1990. Schwann cell-neuronal interac-tions in the rat involve nerve growth factor. J Comp Neurol296:114–122.

Urschel BA, Brown PN, Hulsebosch CE. 1991. Differential effects onsensory nerve processes and behavioral alterations in the rat aftertreatment with antibodies to nerve growth factor. Exp Neurol114:44–52.

Vejsada R, Sagot Y, Kato AC. 1995. Quantitative comparison of thetransient rescue effects of neurotrophic factors on axotomizedmotoneurons in vivo. Eur J Neurosci 7:108–115.

Verge V.M.K, Richardson PM, Benoit R, Riopelle RJ. 1989. Histochemi-cal characterization of sensory neurons with high-affinity receptorsfor nerve growth factor. J Neurocytol 18:583–599.

Verge V.M.K, Tetzlaff W, Bisby MA, Richardson PM. 1990. Influence ofnerve growth factor on neurofilament gene expression in matureprimary sensory neurons. J Neurosci 10:2018–2025.

Verge V.M.K, Merlio J-P, Grondin J, Ernfors P, Persson H, Riopelle RJ,Hokfelt T, Richardson PM. 1992. Colocalization of NGF bindingsites, trk mRNA, and low-affinity NGF receptor mRNA in primarysensory neurons: responses to injury and infusion of NGF. JNeurosci 12:4011–4022.

Wang T, Xie K, Lu B. 1995. Neurotrophins promote maturation ofdeveloping neuromuscular synapses. J Neurosci 15:4796–4805.

Wheeler EF, Bothwell M. 1992. Spatiotemporal patterns of expressionof NGF and the low-affinity NGF receptor in rat embryos suggestfunctional roles in tissue morphogenesis and myogenesis. J. Neuro-sci 12:930–945.

Williams LR, Varon S, Peterson GM, Wictorin K, Fischer W, BjorklundA, Gage FH. 1986. Continuous infusion of nerve growth factorprevents basal forebrain neuronal death after fimbria fornix transec-tion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:9231–9235.

Yan Q, Elliott J, Snider WD. 1992. Brain-derived neurotrophic factorrescues spinal motor neurons from axotomy-induced cell death.Nature 360:753–755.

Yasuda T, Sobue G, Ito T, Mitsuma T, Takahashi A. 1990. Nerve growthfactor enhances neurite arborization of adult sensory neurons; astudy in single-cell culture. Brain Res 524:54–63.

Yip HK, Rich KM, Lampe PA, Johnson EM Jr. 1984. The effects ofnerve growth factor and its antiserum on the postnatal developmentand survival after injury of sensory neurons in rat dorsal rootganglia. J Neurosci 12:2986–2992.

Zhang D, Yao L, Bernd P. 1994. Expression of trk and neurotrophinmRNA in dorsal root and sympathetic ganglia of the quail duringdevelopment. J Neurobiol 25:1517–1532.

Zhou X-F, Rush RA. 1996. Endogenous brain-derived neurotrophicfactor is anterogradely transported in primary sensory neurons.Neuroscience 74:945–951.

232 J.R. TONRA