Upload
diego-gibb
View
216
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Class RankClass RankHonoring Academic Rigor and Honoring Academic Rigor and
Preparation for Success in CollegePreparation for Success in College
Class RankClass RankHonoring Academic Rigor and Honoring Academic Rigor and
Preparation for Success in CollegePreparation for Success in College
Why Do We Rank Students?Why Do We Rank Students?
Class rank is used solely for the purposes Class rank is used solely for the purposes of:of: college admissioncollege admission scholarship eligibilityscholarship eligibility
College SuccessCollege Success
Research shows that the most Research shows that the most important factor for success in important factor for success in college is the rigor of coursework college is the rigor of coursework taken in high schooltaken in high school““The best predictor post-high school The best predictor post-high school success is the quality and intensity of success is the quality and intensity of High School curriculum” High School curriculum”
Cliff Adelman, Answers in the Tool Box, U.S. Department of Education
Why Did NEISD Develop the Current Policy?Why Did NEISD Develop the Current Policy?
Under the previous policy:Academic and Non-Academic courses had the same value i.e.
Office Assistant vs. English Cheerleading vs. Calculus, etc..
Class rank was not a true indicator of rigor and academic preparedness for college success.There was a lack of incentive for taking rigorous coursework, and Multiple students were tied for rank
Differences Between the Previous Policy Differences Between the Previous Policy and the Current Policyand the Current Policy
The current policy uses cumulative The current policy uses cumulative weighted rank points weighted rank points for selected for selected courses courses
The previous policy used an overall The previous policy used an overall Grade Point Average for all coursesGrade Point Average for all courses
What Does the New Rank Policy What Does the New Rank Policy MeMeasureasure??
The policy measures each student’s The policy measures each student’s academic performance and rigor in academic performance and rigor in selected courses:selected courses: English English mathmath sciencescience social studiessocial studies foreign languageforeign language All Pre-AP and AP coursesAll Pre-AP and AP courses
HS Academic Excellence CommitteeHS Academic Excellence Committee
Convened in 2002-2003 Responsibilities:
Review current rank in class policyStudy various ranking scenariosProvide Superintendent with recommendations for change
Common Goal Ensure rank in class represents academic
preparation for college success Fairness and equity for students
The student with the most points is ranked #1.
How is Class Rank determined?How is Class Rank determined? How is Class Rank determined?How is Class Rank determined?
• Semester grade x Rank Factor = Rank Points
• Sum of all Rank Points = Cumulative Rank Points
• Cumulative Rank Points of each student compared to all students in class = Rank Position
2006 Class Rank Clarification Process2006 Class Rank Clarification Process
In Summer 2006, the NEISD Board of In Summer 2006, the NEISD Board of Trustees approved revisions that went Trustees approved revisions that went into effect immediately based on input into effect immediately based on input obtained fromobtained from
parents parents
counselors counselors
administrators administrators
district staffdistrict staff
What Are the New Revisions?What Are the New Revisions?
Increase existing rank factors for all Increase existing rank factors for all Advanced Placement (AP), Advanced Placement (AP), Pre-Advanced Placement (Pre-AP) Pre-Advanced Placement (Pre-AP) and Honors courses:and Honors courses:
• Pre-AP/GT-Pre AP/Honors = 1.15 previously 1.1 was used
• AP/GT-AP = 1.29 previously 1.2 was used
What Are the New Revisions?What Are the New Revisions?
• Increase existing rank factors for all Increase existing rank factors for all Advanced Placement (AP), Pre-Advanced Placement (AP), Pre-Advanced Placement (Pre-AP) and Advanced Placement (Pre-AP) and Honors courses:Honors courses:
• Pre-AP/GT-Pre-AP/Honors = 1.15 previously 1.1 was used
• AP/GT-AP = 1.29 previously 1.2 was used
What Are the New Revisions?What Are the New Revisions?• Exclude all Summer School and Evening
School courses from rank
• Limit the number of semester courses used in the calculation of class rank to no more than eight per semester (the highest eight ranked grades will be used)
• Include all AP and Pre-AP non-core courses in calculation of class rank
• Break any ties between students by using a secondary indicator based on the number of courses taken for which a weight of 1.15 and/or 1.29 was given
How Did NEISD Communicate How Did NEISD Communicate the New Policy?the New Policy?
How Did NEISD Communicate How Did NEISD Communicate the New Policy?the New Policy?
Spring 2004• District meetings held at high schools to explain the new ranking policy—middle school parents invited• Supporting materials posted on the Guidance Website
Fall 2004• Counselors held small group meetings with ninth graders to review
important topics including rank
Spring 2005• HS and MS counselor held meetings with groups of students to explain
graduation requirements and rank• General orientation meeting held prior to course fair held in January• High school course catalog contained graduation requirements with reference to class rank and a separate rank policy explanation—printed in a special section for incoming 9th graders
How Did NEISD Communicate How Did NEISD Communicate the New Policythe New Policy
How Did NEISD Communicate How Did NEISD Communicate the New Policythe New Policy
Fall 2005• Counselors held small group meetings with ninth graders to review important topics including rank
Spring 2006•HS counselors met with groups of ninth graders to review requirements for graduation and important topics such as class rank•General orientation meeting held prior to course fair •Detailed letter mailed home with end-of-year report card explaining new policy clarifications Updated supporting documents posted on Guidance website
Summer 2006•North East Connections mailed to all residing in NEISD with a special article, “Update: High school rank system changes.”
Fall 2006•Students received Class Rank on their report card for 1st nine weeks with an explanatory handout HS counselors held Class Rank meeting for all 10th and 11th graders and their parents
8,0009,000
10,00011,00012,00013,00014,00015,00016,00017,00018,000
2003 2004 2005
Stu
de
nt
Pe
rio
ds
How Did The New Policy Influence How Did The New Policy Influence Rigor?Rigor?
Top 30 Pre-AP/AP CoursesTop 30 Pre-AP/AP Courses
Current Sophomores (2006-2007)
#1 Position
Distribution of Ranked Courses by LevelDistribution of Ranked Courses by LevelCurrent Sophomores (2006-2007) in Top 10%Current Sophomores (2006-2007) in Top 10%
10 Ranked Courses, 47, 53%
11 Ranked Courses, 1, 1%
12 Ranked Courses, 39, 44%
13 Ranked Courses, 1, 1%
14 Ranked Courses, 1, 1%
N=89
0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00
rankgpa
0
200
400
600
800
1000
po
sit
ion
2022 20
242222 20
20
22 202020
22 2024 2022 202020
2624242424
20
201922 1820
22
20 19182020
20
202220 20
1822 20 1820 1920
2220 161820
20 2018
21
202020 17
22
20 1820 18
1820
20 18202020 1820
1820 18 1620 1720 181920 1619 1820 1618 1720 1618
20
141618
18
16 1415
18
18
20
18 14
16
1214
16
1017
111214 12 101313
90
rank
10%
15%
20%
5%
QTR 1
QTR 2
QTR 3
QTR 4
yrninth: 2004
Current Juniors (2006-2007)
Distribution of Ranked Courses by LevelDistribution of Ranked Courses by LevelCurrent Juniors (2006-2007) in Top 10%Current Juniors (2006-2007) in Top 10%
20 Ranked Courses, 39, 46%
22 Ranked Courses, 31, 36%
24 Ranked Courses, 15, 17%26 Ranked Courses, 1,
1%
N=86
Why not consider an Why not consider an Overall Rank Average?Overall Rank Average?
Student A Student B
Rank ExampleRank ExampleCurrent Juniors (06-07)Current Juniors (06-07)Rank ExampleRank ExampleCurrent Juniors (06-07)Current Juniors (06-07)
Total Ranked Classes 18
Rank points 1913.7
5
Ranked GPA 106.31
9
Position: Cumulative 206
Position: Ranked GPA 23
Total Ranked Classes 24
Rank points 2277
Ranked GPA 94.9
Position: Cumulative 14
Position: Ranked GPA 211
ALG II-PRE-AP 76 87.4
ALG II-PRE-AP 74 85.1
BIO PRE AP 92 105.8
BIO PRE AP 86 98.9
CHEM PRE AP 82 94.3
CHEM PRE AP 80 92.0
ENG I PRE AP 89 102.4
ENG I PRE AP 87 100.1
ENG II PRE AP 87 100.1
ENG II PRE AP 88 101.2
GEOMETRY PRE-AP 89 102.4
GEOMETRY PRE-AP 83 95.5
LATIN II 85 85.0
LATIN II PRE-AP 82 94.3
LATIN III 87 87.0
LATIN III 82 82.0
SPANISH I 94 94.0
SPANISH I 96 96.0
COMP SCI PR-AP 86 98.9
COMP SCI PR-AP 86 98.9
W GEO-PRE-AP 89 102.4
W GEO-PRE-AP 88 101.2
W HISTORY 90 90.0
W HISTORY 82 82.0
ALG II-PRE-AP 90 103.5
ALG II-PRE-AP 89 102.4
BIO PRE AP 97 111.6
BIO PRE AP 97 111.6
CHEM PRE AP 90 103.5
CHEM PRE AP 92 105.8
ENG I PRE AP 96 110.4
ENG I PRE AP 97 111.6
ENG II PRE AP 99 113.9
ENG II PRE AP 98 112.7
GEOMETRY PRE-AP 92 105.8
GEOMETRY PRE-AP 97 111.6
JAPANESE I 98 98.0
JAPANESE I 94 94.0
SPANISH I 99 99.0
SPANISH I 99 99.0
W HIS-PRE-AP 96 110.4
W HIS-PRE-AP 95 109.3
The Problem with AveragingThe Problem with Averaging
1085.4 Rank Points108.54 GPA
1395.9 Rank Points107.38 GPA
Example: Students Sorted by Example: Students Sorted by Rank GPARank GPA
Average Rank GPA
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Student
Nu
mb
er o
f S
emes
ter
Co
urs
es
# of Regular semester courses
# of Pre-AP semester courses
# of AP semester courses
Current Rank Policy
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Student
Nu
mb
er o
f S
emes
ter
Co
urs
es
# of Regular semester courses
# of Pre-AP semester courses
# of AP semester courses
Example: Students Sorted by Example: Students Sorted by Cumulative PointsCumulative Points
Pattern of data suggests that both quantity and quality of coursework are important
Conclusion:Many calculation methods are possible for determining students’ class rank. However, a cumulative rank point total honors both quantity and quality of students’ academic course work.
Current Sophomores (2006-2007)
#1 Position
Questions?Questions?