Upload
others
View
6
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Motivation The Hilbert Modular Group Resolution of the Cusps Signatures
Class Numbers, Continued Fractions, and theHilbert Modular Group
Jordan Schettler
University of California, Santa Barbara
11/8/2013
Motivation The Hilbert Modular Group Resolution of the Cusps Signatures
Outline
1 Motivation
2 The Hilbert Modular Group
3 Resolution of the Cusps
4 Signatures
Motivation The Hilbert Modular Group Resolution of the Cusps Signatures
Motivation
Motivation The Hilbert Modular Group Resolution of the Cusps Signatures
‘Minus’ Continued Fractions
Let α ∈ R\Q. Then ∃unique continued fraction expansion
α = [[b0; b1,b2, . . .]] := b0 −1
b1 −1
b2 − · · ·
where b0 ∈ Z and b1,b2, . . . ∈ Z>1.
(b0,b1, . . .) is eventually periodic⇔ α is algebraic of degree 2.
Note: [[2; 2,2, . . .]] = 1, so we must have bk ≥ 3 for∞ly many k
Motivation The Hilbert Modular Group Resolution of the Cusps Signatures
“An Amusing Connection”
Let ` > 3 be a prime such that ` ≡ 3 (mod 4). Then√` = [[b0; b1, . . . ,bm]]
where m = minimal period is even, bm = 2b0 and
(b1,b2, . . . ,bm−1) = (bm−1,bm−2, . . . ,b1).
Theorem (Hirzebruch)
If Q(√`) has class number 1, the class number of Q(
√−`) is
h(−`) =13
m∑k=1
(bk − 3).
Motivation The Hilbert Modular Group Resolution of the Cusps Signatures
The Hilbert Modular Group
Motivation The Hilbert Modular Group Resolution of the Cusps Signatures
Notation
H = {z ∈ C : =(z) > 0}
GL+2 (R) acts on H via Möbius transformations:(
a bc d
)· z =
az + bcz + d
The action induces an isomorphism between the group ofbiholomorphic maps H → H and the group
PL+2 (R) = GL+
2 (R)/{(
a 00 a
): a ∈ R×
}
Motivation The Hilbert Modular Group Resolution of the Cusps Signatures
Notation
Fix an integer n ≥ 1, and consider Hn = H×H× · · · × H︸ ︷︷ ︸n times
.
(PL+2 (R))n acts on Hn component-wise.
∃SES1→ (PL+
2 (R))n → An → Sn → 1
where An = group of biholomorphic maps Hn → Hn andSn = a symmetric group.
Motivation The Hilbert Modular Group Resolution of the Cusps Signatures
Notation
F = number field of degree n over Q
Assume F is totally real: ∃n distinct embeddings
F ↪→ R : x 7→ x (j) for j = 1, . . . ,n
GL+2 (F ) = {A ∈ GL2(F ) : det(A)(j) > 0,∀j = 1, . . . ,n}
We use the embeddings to view
PL+2 (F ) ⊂ (PL+
2 (R))n
Motivation The Hilbert Modular Group Resolution of the Cusps Signatures
Notation
OF = ring of integers of F
We define the Hilbert modular group
G = SL2(OF )/{±1} ⊂ PL+2 (F )
G is a discrete, irreducible subgroup of (PL+2 (R))n
More generally, let Γ denote any discrete, irreduciblesubgroup of (PL+
2 (R))n such that
[G : Γ] :=[G : G ∩ Γ]
[Γ : G ∩ Γ]<∞
Motivation The Hilbert Modular Group Resolution of the Cusps Signatures
Notation
With coordinates zj = xj + iyj on Hn, ∃Gauss-Bonnet form:
ω =(−1)n
(2π)n ·dx1 ∧ dy1
y21
∧ · · · ∧ dxn ∧ dyn
y2n
Theorem (Siegel)
Hn/Γ
∫ω = [G : Γ] · 2ζF (−1) ∈ Q
where ζF (s) is the Dedekind zeta function of F .
Motivation The Hilbert Modular Group Resolution of the Cusps Signatures
Define the isotropy group at z ∈ Hn by
Γz = {γ ∈ Γ : γ · z = z}
Let am(Γ) = # of Γ-orbits of points z with |Γz | = m
Every Γz is finite cyclic, and∑
m≥2 am(Γ) <∞.
TheoremHn/Γ is a non-compact complex analytic space with finitelymany “quotient” singularities and Euler characteristic
χ(Hn/Γ) =
Hn/Γ
∫ω +
∑m≥2
am(Γ)m − 1
m
Motivation The Hilbert Modular Group Resolution of the Cusps Signatures
The n = 1 Case
If n = 1, then F = Q and G = SL2(Z)/{±1}
∃biholomorphism j : H/G→ C
1 = χ(C) = χ(H/G) = 2ζ(−1) +12
+23
= 1
Motivation The Hilbert Modular Group Resolution of the Cusps Signatures
The n = 1 Case Continued
For n = 1 we could take Γ = Γ0(N), a congruence subgroup oflevel N
non-compact Riemann surface H/Γ = Y0(N)
compact Riemann surface X0(N) = Y0(N) ∪ {cusps} where
{cusps} = ({∞} ∪Q)/Γ0(N)
Motivation The Hilbert Modular Group Resolution of the Cusps Signatures
Back to General Case
If Γ ⊆ G, we can compactify Hn/Γ by adding “cusps” P1(K )/Γwhere we view
P1(K ) ⊂ ({∞} ∪ R)n = ∂Hn
Theorem∃bijection {cusps of Hn/G} ↔ class group C of F :
orbit of [α, β] ∈ P1(K ) with α, β ∈ OF 7→ ideal class of (α, β)
Motivation The Hilbert Modular Group Resolution of the Cusps Signatures
From now on take n = 2, so F = Q(√
d) for a squarefree d > 1.
OF =
Z[√
d ] if d ≡ 2,3 (mod 4)
Z[
1+√
d2
]if d ≡ 1 (mod 4)
O×F = {±1} × εZ
H2/G is a Hilbert modular surface.
The # of cusps = the class number h(d) of Q(√
d).
Motivation The Hilbert Modular Group Resolution of the Cusps Signatures
The number of quotient singularities of H2/G is related to theclass numbers of imaginary quadratic fields.
Theorem (Prestel)
For d > 6 and (d ,6) = 1,
a2(G) =
10h(−d) if d ≡ 3 (mod 8)4h(−d) if d ≡ 7 (mod 8)h(−d) if d ≡ 1 (mod 4)
a3(G) = h(−3d), am(G) = 0 for m > 3.
Motivation The Hilbert Modular Group Resolution of the Cusps Signatures
Example
Suppose d ≡ 1 (mod 12). Then
2ζF (−1) =1
15
∑1≤b<
√d
b odd
σ1
(d − b4
4
)
where σ1(m) = sum of divisors of m.
Thus
30χ(H2/G) = 2∑
1≤b<√
db odd
σ1
(d − b4
4
)+ 15h(−d) + 20h(−3d)
Motivation The Hilbert Modular Group Resolution of the Cusps Signatures
Resolution of the Cusps
Motivation The Hilbert Modular Group Resolution of the Cusps Signatures
Consider a cusp of H2/G with representative x ∈ P1(F ).
Translate the cusp to infinity:
ρx =∞ = (∞,∞)
for some ρ ∈ (PL+2 (R))2.
∃deleted closed neighborhoods for∞, x :
W (r) = {(x1 + iy1, x2 + iy2) ∈ H2 : y1y2 ≥ r}
U(r) = ρ−1W (r)
Motivation The Hilbert Modular Group Resolution of the Cusps Signatures
We can choose r � 0 so that
U(r)/G = U(r)/Gx ≈W (r)/ρGxρ−1 ⊆ H2/ρGxρ
−1
There is a SES
1→ M → ρGxρ−1 → V → 1
where M is a fractional ideal and V = {u2 : u ∈ O×F }.
The narrow ideal class of M is uniquely determined by the cusp(indep. of ρ), and we may choose ρ such that
ρGxρ−1 = G(M,V ) = {( v m
0 1 ) : v ∈ V ,m ∈ M}
Motivation The Hilbert Modular Group Resolution of the Cusps Signatures
The quotient space H2/G(M,V ) is a complex manifold.
We can compactify
H2/G(M,V ) = H2/G(M,V ) ∪ {∞}
to obtain a complex analytic space with a singularity at∞.
We now show how M,V are determined and how to resolve thesingularity at∞.
Motivation The Hilbert Modular Group Resolution of the Cusps Signatures
The narrow class group C+ = fractional ideals modulo strictequivalence: a ∼ b⇔ a = λb for some totally positive λ ∈ F
For a fractional ideal a of F , a 7→ a−2 induces a homomorphism
Sq : C → C+
where C+ is the narrow class group of F
Hence to each cusp corresponding to an ideal class a, we havean associated narrow ideal class C = Sq(a).
Motivation The Hilbert Modular Group Resolution of the Cusps Signatures
Every narrow ideal class C ∈ C+ contains an ideal of the form
M = Z + wZ
with w ∈ K and w > 1 > w ′ > 0 (w ′ = Galois conjugate).
This implies w has a purely periodic continued fraction:
w = [[b0; b1, . . . ,bm−1]]
where m = minimal period. (Note: all bk ≥ 2 and bj > 2 some j)
Motivation The Hilbert Modular Group Resolution of the Cusps Signatures
The cycle ((b0,b1, . . . ,bm−1)) (defined up to cyclic permutation)depends only on C ∈ C+.
We define bk by extension using periodicity for all k ∈ Z.
For each k ∈ Z take Rk = C2 with coordinates (uk , vk ).
∃biholomorphism
ϕk : R′k → R′′k+1 : (uk , vk ) 7→ (ubkk vk ,1/uk )
where R′k = Rk\{uk = 0} and R′′k+1 = Rk+1\{vk+1 = 0}.
Motivation The Hilbert Modular Group Resolution of the Cusps Signatures
Take the disjoint union ∪kRk and identify R′k with R′′k+1 via ϕk .
This gives a complex manifold Y of dimension 2 with chartsψk : Rk → C2 given by coordinates (uk , vk )
∃curves Sk in Y given by uk+1 = 0 in Rk+1 (and vk = 0 in Rk ).
By construction, Sk · Sk+1 = 1 while Sk · Sj = 0 for k < j + 1,and we can compute the self-intersections:
Sk · Sk = −bk
Motivation The Hilbert Modular Group Resolution of the Cusps Signatures
M acts freely on C2 via λ · (z1, z2) = (z1 + λ, z2 + λ′)
Note that
Y −⋃k∈Z
Sk = {(u0, v0) : u0 6= 0 6= v0},
so the map
2πiz1 = w log(u0) + log(v0)
2πiz2 = w ′log(u0) + log(v0)
induces a biholomorphism
Φ: Y −⋃k∈Z
Sk −→ C2/M
Motivation The Hilbert Modular Group Resolution of the Cusps Signatures
Define A0 = 1 and inductively Ak+1 = w−1k+1Ak where
wk+1 = [[bk+1,bk+2, . . . ,bk+m]]
Then Am generates the group U+ of totally positive units, andAcm = Ac
m generates V = (O×F )2 where c = [U+ : V ] ∈ {1,2}.
The group V acts on Y + = Φ−1(H2/M) ∪⋃
k∈Z Sk :
(Acm)n sends (uk , vk ) in the k th coordinate system to the pointwith the same coordinates in the (k + ncm)th coordinatesystem.
Under the action, Sk is mapped by (Acm)n to the curve Sk+ncm
Motivation The Hilbert Modular Group Resolution of the Cusps Signatures
Y + is an open submanifold of Y with a free and properlydiscontinuous action of V .
Y ((b0, . . . ,bcm−1)) = Y +/V is a complex manifold
∃cycle of curves S0,S1, . . . ,Scm−1 with intersection matrix
−b0 1 0 · · · 0 11 −b1 1 0 · · · 00 1 −b2 1 0 · · ·· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·0 · · · 0 1 −bcm−2 11 0 · · · 0 1 −bcm−1
or(−b0 2
2 −b1
)for cm = 2, or (−b0 + 2) for cm = 1.
Motivation The Hilbert Modular Group Resolution of the Cusps Signatures
The Resolution
∃holomorphic map
σ : Y ((b0, . . . ,bcm−1))→ H2/G(M,V )
such that:
σ−1(∞) =cm−1⋃k=0
Sk
and
Y ((b0, . . . ,bcm−1))−cm−1⋃k=0
Sk → H2/G(M,V )
is a biholomorphism.
Motivation The Hilbert Modular Group Resolution of the Cusps Signatures
Signatures
Motivation The Hilbert Modular Group Resolution of the Cusps Signatures
Definition
Let M be a complex surface. ∃symmetric bilinear form
β : H2(M,R)× H2(M,R)→ R
given by the intersection of homology classes.
We define the signature of M by
sign(M) = b+ − b−
where b+ (resp. b−) is the # of positive (resp. negative)eigenvalues of a matrix representing β.
Motivation The Hilbert Modular Group Resolution of the Cusps Signatures
Two Geometric Formulas
Let M be a connected, complex surface.
Theorem (Adjunction Formula)For a nonsingular, compact curve S on M,
χ(S) = −K · S − S · S
where K is a canonical divisor on M.
Theorem (Signature Formula)
If M is a compact manifold with no boundary,
sign(M) =13
(K · K − 2χ(M))
where K is a canonical divisor on M.
Motivation The Hilbert Modular Group Resolution of the Cusps Signatures
∀a ∈ C we associate a compact manifold with boundary Xaobtained by resolving the singularity (as above) of
W (r)/G(M,V ) ≈ (U(r)/G) ∪ {x} ⊆ H2/G
where r � 0 and x is the cusp corresponding to a.
We define the signature deviation invariant
δ(Xa) =13
(K · K − 2χ(Xa))− sign(Xa)
where K is a canonical divisor on Xa.
Motivation The Hilbert Modular Group Resolution of the Cusps Signatures
Computing δ(Xa)
Xa is constructed by blowing up the cusp x into a cycle of cmnonsingular curves S0, . . . ,Scm−1.
The intersection matrix (as in the previous section) gives
sign(Xa) = −cm
In fact, Xa is homotopy equivalent to⋃cm−1
k=0 Sk , so
χ(Xa) = 1− 1 + cm = cm
Motivation The Hilbert Modular Group Resolution of the Cusps Signatures
Computing δ(Xa)
For each k the adjunction formula gives
2 = χ(Sk ) = −K · Sk − Sk · Sk = −K · Sk + bk ,
so
−K =cm−1∑k=0
Sk ,
and
K · K = −cm−1∑k=0
bk + 2cm.
Motivation The Hilbert Modular Group Resolution of the Cusps Signatures
Computing δ(Xa)
Therefore
δ(Xa) =13
(−c
m−1∑k=0
bk + 2cm − 2cm
)− (−cm) = −c
3
m−1∑k=0
(bk − 3)
Suppose F = Q(√
d) has no units of negative norm. (c = 2)
Theorem (Curt Meyer)
If ζ(s,C) = partial zeta function of C = Sq(a),
ζ(0,C) = −ζ(0,C∗) =16
m−1∑k=0
(bk − 3)
(=−12c
δ(Xa)
)
where a−2 = C ∪ C∗.
Motivation The Hilbert Modular Group Resolution of the Cusps Signatures
Assume F = Q(√`) where ` > 3 is a prime with ` ≡ 3 (mod 4).
∃unique, character ψ on C+ which is non-trivial and real-valued.
Meyer’s theorem implies
sign(H2/G) =∑a∈C
δ(Xa) = −4∑C∈C+
ψ(C)ζ(0,C)
= −4L(0, ψ) = −4h(−`)h(−1)
2= −2h(−`)
Motivation The Hilbert Modular Group Resolution of the Cusps Signatures
If, additionally, F = Q(√`) has class number 1, then C = {a}
where a = [OF ] is the trivial ideal class.
C = Sq(a) is the trivial narrow ideal class, so we may choose
M = OF = Z + (d√`e+
√`)Z
with √` = [[b0; b1, . . . ,bm]]
where m = minimal period, b0 = d√`e, bm = 2b0, and whence
d√`e+
√` = [[2b0; b1, . . . ,bm−1]].
Motivation The Hilbert Modular Group Resolution of the Cusps Signatures
Thus we recover the “amusing connection”
−2h(−`) = sign(H2/G) = δ(Xa) = −23
(2b0 +
m−1∑k=1
(bk − 3)
),
or more simply
h(−`) =13
m∑k=1
(bk − 3)
Note: We did NOT need ANY signatures or surfaces to derivethe formula for the class number.