Civilization Jihad: Islam's "Great Commission." By Chris Farrell

8/11/2019 Civilization Jihad: Islam's "Great Commission." By Chris Farrell

1/57

Civilization Jihad: The Muslims Great Commission.By Chris Farrell

NOLA; U.S.A. MMXIV.


2/57

In Morgan Brittnays op/edJihad CoolRecruiting Terrorists From America

(8/26/2014. wnd.com.)she comments on the infamous Rolling Stone magazinecover

featuring the militant CivilizationJihadistDzhokhar Tsarnaevand writes, He was

not being portrayed as the cold, psychopath that he is, but as a sympathetic,

misguided young man.,continuing, "This was when I realized that there was a

conscious effort being made to make terrorism cool and sexy."

The conscious effort Ms. Brittany identifies would be rightly identified as Mass

Communications CivilizationJihad, or MediaJihad.

The Militant CivilizationJihadistwho blows himself up in a crowded cafe or opens fire with

multiple weapons on a school does so as much to inflict upon the whole of the society under

siege fear as to kill his immediate targets; in fact more so.


3/57

The mission of the militant CivilizationJihadistis to bring widespread attention to his 'cause,'

his 'struggle,' or asJihadis translated into German, his 'Kampf.'


4/57

The many other dimensions of CivilizationJihadare just as sinister, equally as dangerous, to the lives,

livelihood, and liberty of the citizens in a non-Islamic society under siege by the murderous, totalitarian,

and supremacist ideology that evinces a design to reduce all non-Muslims to the de factoslave status

that Muslims call the dhimmi, and that clearly pronounces its aspirations of world domination that we

know as Islam.


5/57


6/57


7/57

The Muslim who comes on the television talk-show regurgitating like so much vomit the infamous lie

that 'Islam is a religion of peace'while being fully aware that the apparently peaceful verses from the

texts that Muslims hold as sacred are abrogatedthat is to say overruled according to Islamic doctrine

embraced by virtually every division, denomination, sect, branch, or subgroup of Islam extantby the

later verses commanding murderous mayhem be undertaken by ALL Muslims; yes, even the infamous

'moderate' Muslim that we hear so much about, is nothing less than a Media CivilizationJihadistpaving


8/57

the avenue of approach to the target for the Militant CivilizationJihadistboth have the same ultimate

objective.

Another example of the deceptive nature of the strategy being employed by Islamic Civilization Jihadists

is when Mass Communication CivilizationJihadistsfacilitate the advance of the Militant Civilization

Jihadistsby convincing members within a society under siege by the Islamic multi-stage process of

conquest that the money which non-Muslims are forced to pay within an Islamic state and demanded of

from non-Islamic states as well is a "tax."

TheJizyais NOT a Tax, it is extortion inflicted upon non-Muslims at the threat of great bodilyharm or even death, yet Western news reportersor the pathetic Liberal-fascist pressthe propaganda

department devotees of the so-called Progressive Democrats that are little more than a poor excuse for

journalists now reporting over the vast majority of America's news agenciesfacilitate the Islamic

enemies advancement of the lie when they report that Christians and other non-Muslim groups are

being forced to pay a tax.

One might safely imagine that the reader knows what a tax is. Perhaps the reader pays a tax to have his

or her garbage collected, or a tax on his or her property, or a tax when he or she purchased a car: Surely

nobody threatened to cut the throat of the reader's husband or wife and children after raping them if he

or she should fail to pay any of his or her taxes.


9/57

Message to that idiot Sean Hannity: Please stop calling theJizyaa "Tax.

The Muslim working at the convenience store who sells the crack pipe to the Liberal-socialist Democrat

who has been raised on the 'Progressive' Welfare States metaphorical plantation without a fatheronly

having an absentee 'Baby Daddy' substitute for a fatheris waging Social CivilizationJihad.


10/57

Said Muslim clerk, (not that his name is actually Said,but thats possible too! Hah!), contributes in his

distribution of drug paraphernalia to the destruction of the infidel. He wages his own personalJihad to

advance the worldwide domination agenda of Islam by contributing to the destruction of one life at a

time within the non-Islamic nation under siege.


11/57

Tragically ironic is that once imprisoned the often times African-American crack head, though there are

Caucasian, Latino, and every other people-type as well enslaved by drugs, is sometimes recruited into

Islam which has for 1400-plus years enslaved many Africans and still in fact does.


12/57


13/57

There are no parameters to the definition of CivilizationJihad.Anything that the Muslim does to

undermine the stability of the non-Islamic society under siege by Islamic CivilizationJihadand to elevate

and stabilize Islam's position within every sphere of said society under siege is done in the name of

CivilizationJihad.


14/57

CivilizationJihadis a religiously held doctrinal tenet of the Islamo-fascist philosophical and political

ideology and religio-cultural worldview known as Islam.

CivilizationJIhad is the perverse inverse parallel equivalent to Christianity'sGreat Commission:

"Go therefore and make disciples of all nations,

baptizing them in[a] the name of the Father and of the

Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20 teaching them to observe

all that I have commanded you."(Matthew 28: 29-20.)


15/57

For the Islamic CivilizationJihadist, a.k.a. the Muslim, in place

of 'Go and make disciples of all nations and baptize them,'is

to go into all non-Islamic nations and wage CivilizationJihad

and behead them.

Waging CivilizationJihad, what any individual Muslim may rightly describe as his or her own struggleIn

fact he or she would correctly phrase CivilizationJihadas 'My struggle,' or if they should happen to be

German Muslims they would use the words'Mein Kampf,'is, according to the doctrines and tenets of

Islam EVERYMuslims dutyyes even that so-called moderate Muslim next door to you or working in

your office who claims much like the poster child for Liberal-fascismthat is to say Liberal-socialism or

Progressivism espoused by the Democrat party and many within the Elitist Faction controlling theRepublican Party and as well as the leadership of Tea Party organizations across America which have

been co-opted by the Liberal-socialist Elitist FactionRodney King that all he really wants is for

everybody to just get along.

The nominal Muslim may even mean it when he says that he just wants to live and let live, but thats

NOT what the totalitarian system of tyrannical governance and societal control known as Islam holds as

an ideological and religious dogma. Though nominal Muslims may want to live and let live, they are fully

aware that others who hold to the actual teachings of Islam will permit no such living.


16/57

The fact is that the Muslim you may not feel threatened by simply does not adhere to the actual

teachings of Islam just as everyone who claims to be a Christian does not actually adhere to biblical

standards of righteousness.

In case the reader hasnt noticed, Islamic CivilizationJihadistshave no reservations in their sick hearts

and minds in dealing barbarically with nominal Muslims right along with those they call infidels.


17/57

Liberal-Fascism, that is to say Liberal-Socialism, exemplified in the infamous efforts of the National

Socialists in Germany, that is to say the NAZIS, and Islamo-Fascism are Fascist birds of a feather really.


18/57

The parallels in the underlying philosophical perversions upon which the Islamo-fascist and the Liberal-

fascist worldviews are constructed are endless and most telling, yet virtually all social and political

columnists in the West seem utterly dumbfounded as to why Liberal-fascist, 'Progressive' Democrats

continuously facilitate the infiltration of CivilizationJihadistsof all stripes into the fabric of non-Islamic

societies; as to why Leftists invite the dreaded disease of Islam to spread within even their own

countries.


19/57

Birds of a feather stick together, Stupid. Liberal-fascism, or Liberal-socialism, or National Socialismthat

is to say NAZISM, or Progressivism, or Liberalism are but stepping stone towards conquest for the

Islamo-fascist. Liberal-socialist, Progressive Democrats invite the spread of Islam just as is witnessed in

Eurabiatoday.


20/57


21/57

The most prominent characteristics of Liberalsthat of being delusionalpermits them to delusionally

proceed in dealing with the barbaric totalitarian system of governance and control over virtually every

aspect of society known as Islam in complete denial as to the true evil nature of Islam, and allows the

Liberal to blindly swallow, as Liberals do so many other lies, the never ending series of lies upon lies

promulgated by Islamist apologists: Most prominently among Islams lies the absurd lie that 'Islam is a

religion of peace.'


22/57


23/57

Is there any sect, denomination, division, branch, or subgroup of Islam which does NOT hold to the

world domination agenda doctrines of Islam in which non-Muslims are relegated to the de factoslave

status of the dhimmi and forced to pay the extortion payment known by Muslims as thejizyawhile they

are tolerated within an Islamic societythat is to say until they are executed according to Islamic

doctrine? NO! There is not.

The establishment of a one-world Caliphateunder the horrendously

tyrannical system of jurisprudence that all Muslims refer to as Shariais

a universally held Islamic doctrinal tenet.


24/57

If one may be described as a "radical" Muslim for holding such aspirations as that of the domination of

Islam over all non-Islamic cultures and the embracing of the conviction that there needs be the

establishment of a one-world Caliphate then are not ALLMuslims by definition "radical"?

Please direct me to that division, sect, denomination, branch, or subgroup upon the spectrum of Islamic

schools of thought which does NOT hold to the Islamic doctrines of CivilizationJihadand to the

establishment of a one-world Caliphateunder Sharialaw in which I presume all the oft mentioned

enigmatic 'Moderate Muslims' must of course belong.

STOP!That was a trick request; just me being facetious. You cannot direct me to said NON-RADICAL

branch of Islam because NO SUCH GROUP EXISTS!


25/57

The very fact that there is no element within Islam that does NOT embrace the RADICAL notion of world

domination and subjugation of all non-Muslim nations makes it rather offensive to all who would be

subjugated under Islam as infidelsrelegated to the de factoslave status of the dhimmiif

CivilizationJihadistsare permitted to have their wayfor anyone to assert that there is any "radical"

Islam, for to assert that there is a "radical" Islam is to imply that there exists an

other-than-radical Islam when there does not.

Point me to it! Please identify the other-than-radical sect, denomination, branch, or division of Islam

here:___________________________________________.

I'm still waiting.


26/57

Undoubtedly the Islamo-fascist facilitating Liberal-fascist will attempt to make the case that there are

Muslims who have no intention of shooting me. How comforting. It is true though. We have all studied

alongside them, worked with them, partied with them, but is it fair to give Islam a pass on account of

observations of nominal Muslims who DO NOT PRACTICE the teachings of Islam? NO!

I can show you millions upon millions of Americans who claim to be Christian, but who have no intention

whatsoever of adhering to biblical standards of righteousness. Said nominal Christiansin name only

sleep around, steal, kill, lie, etc....

Are we to draw any conclusions about doctrinal positions of Bible believing Christians by the behavior of

those who do not actually PRACTICE the religion? No, we must judge Christianity by Christ, the Word of

God, and that which is actually maintained in the teachings of Christianitynot by the multitudinous

perversions of the Faith.


27/57

Such people who claim to be Christian but who choose NOT to follow the teachings of the risen Lord

Jesus Christ of the Bibleagain, not to be confused with the myriad false Jesus constructs, most

notoriously the Eucharistic Christ of the Roman Catholic Church, (See The Eucharistic Christ And The

New Evangelizationby Roger Oakland for clarification on why the Romanist organization cannot beconsidered Christian)are known as nominal Christians, that is to say: in name only.

And so it is with nominal Muslims. Many so-called Muslims do not adhere to the actual teachings of

Islamthanks be to God!


28/57

The Muslims cutting off the heads of American journalists such as James Foleyalong with a great many

nominal Muslims headsARE IN FACT ACTING ACCORDING TO THE TEACHINGS OF ISLAM.

Nominal Muslims drink at our nightclubs and very much enjoy gambling in America's casinos. I've dealt

blackjack to more than a few of them. They attend America's finest schools, and watch all the movies

that the rest of the country watches including lots of pornographic film. Although they too sometimes

have fits of self-righteous anger in which they kill their children in 'honor killings' when their children

stray even further from their Islamist roots as they themselves have while living in a non-Islamic society,

they by and large exist peaceably alongside the rest of We the People.

But it is important to note that it is not fair to judge Christianity by those who do not follow the

teachings of Christ as recorded in the biblical Texts, and it is not fair to judge the murderous totalitarian

philosophical ideology/political worldview and religious cult of Islam by those who do not follow theteaching in the writings that ALL Muslims hold as sacredthe Koran and Hadith.


29/57

That being said, THERE IS NO RADICAL ISLAM AND THERE IS NO MODERATE ISLAM, THERE IS JUST ISLAM

and Islam should not be tolerated within a free society.


30/57

Would Americans have tolerated a NAZIpolitical organization to protest in 1944, or for the NAZISto

have had a television station with which to propagandize the news with a favorable spin towards their

cause as America today tolerates the advancement of tyrannical Islamic Civilization Jihad ideology

throughAl Jazeera?


31/57

There are those who adhere to the murderous teachings of Islam called Muslims. Then there are those

who may claim to be Muslims but who choose not to adhere to the murderous teachings in the texts

that ALL OF ISLAM hold as sacredthose would be correctly identified as nominal Muslims. According to

the texts which all of Islam hold as sacred those nominal Muslims are not Muslim at all, hence the

frequent beheading of such phonies in the eyes of true Islamic adherents.

There is no moderate Islam and by extension there is no such thing as a "moderate" Muslim.

There are those who do adhere to the teachings of Islam which prescribe the many dimensions of

CivilizationJihadbe waged by ALL Muslims, and there are those who do NOT adhere to the teachings of

Islam who are nothing more than NOMINAL MUSLIMS.


32/57


33/57

In case you haven't noticed, if a Muslim who does follow the murderous doctrines of Islam encounters

an individual who claims to be a Muslim who does NOT follow those "RADICAL" teachings it is held as a

doctrinal tenet that it is the duty of the faithful Muslim to kill the nominal Muslim impostor as we see

taking place in many Muslim against purportedly Muslim massacres.

The Nominal Muslim becomes a military asset to the practicing Muslim when the practicing Muslim

approaches the nominal Muslim with an 'offer he can't refuse' because for the nominal Muslim to refuse

may mean his family members in Syria, Iran, Indonesia, the Philippines, or somewhere else in the pan-

Islamic Ummawill be tortured and killed.


34/57

The frequent employment of the nominal Muslim as a weapons delivery platform makes all nominal

Muslims an existential threat within societies under siege by Islam.


35/57

The radicalization of the nominal Muslim is nothing more than apersuasion upon said nominal Muslim

to actually commence with the following of the teachings of Islamthe religion that the nominal

Muslim already claims allegiance toor else.


36/57

It is not a great leap to take for a nominal Muslim to undertake the mission of the militant Civilization

Jihadist and therefore ALL Muslims present an existential threat of becoming radicalized, or becoming

more intensely doctrinally obedient to the actual teachings of Islam.


37/57

Islamo-fascism should not be tolerated within any free society just as Liberal-fascism, or Liberal-

socialismNational Socialism (NAZI) being the prime example of the ideologyshould not be tolerated

within any free society.


38/57

When the time comes that the practicing Muslimwhat Liberals call "radical"needs the nominal

Muslim who may be selling you cigarettes at your local convenience store or dating your cousin to leave

an improvised explosive in a cafe in your city, or perhaps among those gathered at a Tea Party event,


39/57

the militant CivilizationJihadistis easily able to coerce the seemingly harmless nominal Muslim into

delivering the package.

Israel has been subjected to such attacks by seemingly harmless little old ladies who could have been

described as nominal, peaceable Muslims, and Muslim children laden with explosives time and time

again.

America does not need to suffer innumerable Islamic Civilization Jihadist attacks before recognizing the

true nature of the enemy we face: Islam is the enemy. Islam should not be tolerated in any way, shape,

or form within the fabric of American society.

The nominal Muslim has no choice but to comply when presented with an offer they cant refusemade

by the practicing Muslim. That is why every so-called "Moderate Muslim" in America is nothing less than

a weapon on the shelf of the practicing Muslim's Arms Room standing by to be employed when the

'Radical Muslim,' the militant Civilization Jihadist, determines that the time has come for the nominal

Muslimwhat many today still regard as the Moderate Muslimto follow instructions forAllahor

else.

The practicing Muslim has many variations of said delivery system in his Arms Room. Sometimes they

use individuals who have been diagnosed with a fatal disease. They simply promise the dying nominal

Muslim that their surviving family members will receive assistance. Then there is the infamous promise


40/57

which has sent thousands upon thousands of ignorant bastard children of the devil to their death for the

demonic Moon god of the Muslims,Allah: 70 virgins! HAAAAAAAA!

Non Islamic societies must stop delineating "Radical" Muslims from the supposed "Moderate" Muslims

within their midst for the suggestion that there are moderate Muslims is a falsehooda liewhich

figuratively lays out a red carpet upon which Islam is further invited to spread within said societies like a

disease.


41/57

There are practicing Muslims and there are nominal Muslims but there is no Moderate Islam, and

therefore by logical extension the assertion that there is such a thing as a "moderate" Muslim is quite

offensive to any free person who, by definition not being a Muslim, is nothing less than a target to those

who advance the worldwide domination agenda of the murderous totalitarian system of governance

and control over every sphere of society known as Islam.


42/57

Those who have taken an oath to defend the Constitutionthat's ALL the Constitution including Article

IIwill eventually be given their last opportunity to honor their oath of office before rightly being

recognized as enemies of the Constitution and as enemies of the government of the United States of

Americathat would be 'We the People.'


43/57

"To the Founders, tolerance was not to be equated with approval or agreement, let alone

encouragement that would imply an equal place should be made for non-Christian religion in

government, schools, etc. The Founders were no more willing to encourage Islam than they were

interested in encouraging the spread of atheism, paganism, or Native American religion. [NOTE:

Atheists, though few in number at the time in America, were not allowed to serve as witnesses in

courtsee Story, 1851, 2:8-9; Swift, 1796, 2:238.] For example, the Father of our country, George


44/57

Washington, delivered a speech to the Delaware Indian chiefs on May 12, 1779: You do well to wish to

learn our arts and ways of life, and above all, the religion of Jesus Christ. These will make you a greater

and happier people than you are. Congress will do everything they can to assist you in this wise

intention (15:55, emp. added). Far from encouraging the superstitious idolatry of much of Native

American religion, the Founders (including the Congress!) urged Indians to convert to Christianity. The

same may be said for all other non-Christian ideologiesincluding the inherently godless economic

philosophies of socialism, Marxism, fascism, and atheistic communism. Indeed, their words and actions

denigrate such thought systems. They believed that non-Christian philosophies and religions were false

and ultimately detrimental to genuine liberty." ('Where The Founding Fathers "Tolerant" Of Islam.

(David Miller, Ph. D. *Editors Note: This article is the first installment of a two-part critique of an article

written by James Hutson, Library of Congress Manuscript Division Chief, on the Founding Fathers

attitude toward Islam.].)

"WHAT THEY MEANT BY "RELIGIOUS FREEDOM"

The Founders idea of religious freedom was actually quite simple and sensiblein contrast with the

self-contradictory and inconsistent view of todays vacuous notions of tolerance and political

correctness. The facts show that the mass of the Founders, with few exceptions, believed that the

Christian worldview and Christian principles must be the foundation of the Republic (see, for example,

the 15 proclamations issued by the Continental Congress from 1775 to 1783 in Miller, 2009).

Consequently, their view of religious freedom and tolerance amounted essentially to the prevention of

religious persecution. Those who practiced no religion or a non-Christian religion could come to America

and not be persecuted for the simple reason that the bulk of the Founders and the mass of American

citizens embraced Christian principles that forbid persecuting ones fellowman (e.g., Matthew 5:38-47;

Luke 6:27-36).

The Founders had felt the sting of persecution in their disagreement with the state religion (i.e., the

Church of England). They were well familiar with their mother countrys long history of religious

oppression, depending on whether a Catholic or a Protestant monarch was on the throne. The

Founders forefathers were the pilgrims who fled England specifically on account of religious

persecution. Hence, the Founders and Framers wanted the new Republic to dispense with such

coercionin complete harmony with the nature of God Himself, who created humans to be freewill

agents who make their own decisions with regard to their eternal destiny. Further, because the

Founders had grown up in an environment that promulgated Christian principles, they understood and

embraced Jesus admonition to treat others the way they themselves wished to be treated (Matthew

7:12). Thomas Jeffersons query posed to the ambassador of Tripoli reflects this principle: We took the

liberty to make some inquiries concerning the grounds of their pretensions to make war upon nations

who had done them no injury, and observed that we considered all mankind as our Friends who had

done us no wrong, nor had given us any provocation (Letter from the, 1786, emp. added). To the

Founders, permitting non-Christian peoples to live in our country without persecution was not

tantamount to celebrating diversity or endorsing what they considered to be false religion. Rather,

doing so was first and foremost an affirmation of their desire that all peoples be allowed to pursue

happiness without governmental intrusion or coercion.


45/57

TWO CRITICAL EXCEPTIONS

However, we must hasten to emphasize that the Founders placed two important qualifications on

religious tolerance. First, religious toleration extended only so far as the religion in question did not

engage in a practice that is deemed by Christian standards to be immoral. For example, in a case that

went all the way to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in 1815, The Commonwealth v. Sharpless, the

defendant was convicted for displaying in his home an obscene painting of a man and woman in an

indecent posturean offense against Christian morality (1815). Likewise, in a number of Supreme

Court cases, instances of Mormon polygamy were prosecuted as violations of Christian morality

though the defense argued that the practice was justifiable on the grounds of freedom of religion (e.g.,

Reynolds v. United States, 1879; Murphy v. Ramsey, 1885; Davis v. Beason, 1890). The Founders never

envisioned the First Amendment providing sanction for any behavior that is deemed by Christian

standards to be immoral or licentious. Yet, now that Islam is making significant encroachments into

American society, with its brazen advocacy of polygamy (Surah 4:3; cf. 4:24-25,129; 23:6; 30:21; 70:30),

the erosion of Christian morality and the appalling ignorance of the founding principles among the

population will inevitably sanction such immorality under the guise of tolerance and religious

freedom.

A second exception that clarifies the notion of religious freedom is seen in the Founders insistence that

religious freedom did not extend to any action that would bring physical harm to self or other citizens.

Actions like Buddhist priests setting themselves on fire in the street, or temple priestesses providing

sexual services to devotees, or brothels, or businesses that peddle pornography would not have been

tolerated by the Founders under the guise of freedom of religion (Commonwealth v. Nesbit, 1859).

That means that Islams fifteen hundred yearlong historical propensity for engaging in street violence,

suicide bombing, and the execution of those who refuse to submit to Allahactions that are endemic to

Islam and the Quran (e.g.,Surah 47:4)are not to be tolerated as protected religious practice. The

number of incidents in America of Islamic honor killings is mounting (Missouri Couple, 1991;Schoetz, 2008; Thompson, 2011; Tang, 2011; Myers, 2011; Daily Mail, 2012)a natural by-product of

political correctness, a misunderstanding of the principle of religious freedom, and the loss of the

average Americans commitment to Christian morality. Religious freedom notwithstanding, the

Founders were wary of any infiltration of the nations institutions by Mahometans in light of their

religious inclinations toward physical violence (cf. Miller, 2005).

TOLERANCE?

With these observations in mind, what is one to make of Hutsons allusions to incidents in which the

Founders seemingly manifested inclusive sentiments? Consider the following point-by-point

examination of each document cited by Hutson as proof of his claim regarding the Founders. First, theimportation of Muslim slaves into the colonies offers no support whatsoever to the idea that the

Founders were prepared to make a place for Islam in the Republicany more than they sought to

accommodate the pagan animism of African slaves or the polytheism of Native Americans. Hutson

admits as much when he concedes that there is no evidence that the Founders were aware of the

religious convictions of their bondsmen.

Second, the toleration proposed by John Locke in his A Letter Concerning Toleration has, as its context,


46/57

first and foremost, the toleration that ought to be extended by Christian sects to each other. While he

certainly advocates that the same civil rights be extended to Jews, pagans, and Mahometanshe

articulates several very clearly defined exceptions. Specifically, in a section dealing with those whom the

civil magistratecannot tolerate, he pinpoints:

1. Those whose religious opinions are contrary to those moral rules which are necessary to the

preservation of civil society (1796, p. 53);

2. The religion that teaches expressly and openly, that men are not obliged to keep their promise (p.

54);

3. *T+hose that will not own and teach the duty of tolerating all men in matters of mere religionand

that they only ask leave to be tolerated by the magistrate so long, until they find themselves strong

enough to *seize the government+ (p. 55);

4. All those who see themselves as having allegiance to another civil authority (p. 56). Specifically, Locke

gives the example of the Muslim who lives among Christians and would have difficulty submitting to the

government of a Christian nation when he comes from a Muslim country where the civil magistrate

was also the religious authority. Locke notes that such a person would have grave difficulty serving as a

soldier in his adopted nation (cf. the 2009 Fort Hood shooting spree by a Muslim soldier who shouted,

Allahu Akbar as he opened fire, killing 13 and wounding 32; see Stewart, 2010).

5. *T+hose are not at all to be tolerated who deny the being of a God (p. 56).

Four of these five exceptions inarguably describe Muslim behavior across the world since the inception

of Islam." (Ibid.)


47/57

Islam is a political and philosophical ideologya religio-cultural system of governance upon which a

Muslims worldview is constructed and codified within the sacred texts of the murderous supremacist

cult: the Koran and Hadith.

Islam is a comprehensive method of tyrannical societal control over every aspect of an Islamic culture

within the enslaving governing organization of the Caliphatein which the system of jurisprudence isknown as Sharia.

Shariais simply the legal dimension of the tyrannical system of societal control known as Islam.

CivilizationJihads dimension of demographic invasionis nothing less than an invasion tactic into a non-

Islamic society.


48/57

Islam traditionally advances in stages. Demographic domination is only one method by which theMuslim advances the world domination agenda of every sect, division, denomination, branch, or

subgroup of Islam.


49/57


50/57

It was the contention of the signers of the Declaration of Independence in recognizing the entitlement

of separate but equal station availed by the laws of Nature and Nature's God, the risen Lord Jesus Christ

of the Bible, unto a free nation, that any such nation's people should rightly exercise the action of

decently respecting the opinions of Mankind in the Course of human events by declaring the causes

which impelled them towards separation from Great Britain.


51/57

Today, Americans should decently respect the opinions of Mankind in the Course of human events and

declare, as we face the trial of our time: An enemy as seemingly insurmountable as Great Britain

seemed unto our nation's Forefathers, 'The causes which impel' us now unto the separation, rejection,

exclusion, and determination to utterly defeat the worldwide domination agenda of the murderous cult

of Islam in all of its dimensions.

Holding certain truths as self-evident as did our nation's Founders repudiates the arguments for the

toleration of any encroachment upon those truths by erroneous ideologies such as that espoused and

advanced by an Islamistsworldview which denies the 'Creator', the Lord Jesus Christ, from whom all

men are endowed with certain unalienable rights, and evinces a design to relegate all non-Muslims to

the de factoslave status of what the Muslims call the dhimmi.

The self-evident Truth that 'all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with

certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness' rings familiar

and true in the hearts of all those who would call themselves American.

Those words are the very tintinnabulation of Liberty resounding for generations within the collective

breast of 'We the People'of the United States of America.

Those words reverberate with the 'Spirit of 1776', the American spirit of Liberty revered and saluted

symbolically in the Liberty Bell, which though cracked and silent still rings loudly in the hearts of all those

who assent to the Truth that all men are created equal and endowed by their Creator, the Lord Jesus


52/57

Christ of the Bible, with certain unalienable rights; a citizenry otherwise known as 'We the People' or

Americans.

The Declaration of Independence continues, "That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted

among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,--That whenever any Form of

Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, andto institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such

form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will

dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and

accordingly all experience hath shewn, that Mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are

sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. BUT

WHEN A LONG TRAIN OF ABUSES AND USURPATIONS,

PURSUING INVARIABLY THE SAME OBJECT EVINCES A DESIGN

TO REDUCE THEM UNDER ABSOLUTE DESPOTISM, IT IS THEIR

RIGHT, IT IS THEIR DUTY, TO THROW OFF SUCH GOVERNMENT

AND TO PROVIDE NEW GUARDS FOR THEIR FUTURE SECURITY.

The murderous cult of Islam evinces a design to

reduce all non-Muslims unto the de facto slave

status of the dhimmiunder the absolute despotismof Sharialaw.


53/57


54/57

It is every American's right and duty to cut from the fabric of American society such an evil ideology

which advances a world domination agenda designed to enslave all those who do not submit to the

enslaving tyranny of the Islamic worldview.


55/57


56/57

The freedom of religion extended unto We the Peopleby the government of the people, by the people

and for the people should not be extended unto adherents of the insane Islamo-fascist

philosophical/political ideology and religio-cultural worldview of the murderous cult of Islam.


57/57

Documents

Civilization Jihad: Islam's "Great Commission." By Chris Farrell