134
City Wide Social Survey Series 5 Dr. Christine S. Diaz Ms. Mildred M. Estanda Ms. Ma. Vanessa Amor E. Sobrejuanite Ateneo de Davao University E. Jacinto St. With Funding Support from the University Research Council (URC) Administered by: Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)

City Wide Social Survey Series 5 - Ateneo de Davao University...Albularyo 3% Ignored the Illness 2% (%) Ateneo de Davao University University Research Council (URC) Social Research

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • City Wide Social Survey Series 5

    Dr. Christine S. Diaz

    Ms. Mildred M. Estanda

    Ms. Ma. Vanessa Amor E. Sobrejuanite

    Ateneo de Davao University

    E. Jacinto St.

    With Funding Support from the

    University Research Council (URC)

    Administered by:

    Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)

  • Methodology

    • CWSS 5 was conducted last May 25-30, 2016

    • Face to Face interviews

    • Random Sampling

    ±4 margin of error, 95% level of significance

    • 630 adults in Davao City

    3 Districts

    11 Sub-districts

    • Some questions of the survey were shared by SWS to Ateneo de Davao

    University.

    Ateneo de Davao University

    E. Jacinto St.

    With Funding Support from the

    University Research Council (URC)

    Administered by:

    Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)

    Ateneo de Davao University

    E. Jacinto St.

    With Funding Support from the

    University Research Council (URC)

    Administered by:

    Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)

  • Ateneo de Davao University

    E. Jacinto St.

    With Funding Support from the

    University Research Council (URC)

    Administered by:

    Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)

    Geographical Summaries

    Ateneo de Davao University

    E. Jacinto St.

    With Funding Support from the

    University Research Council (URC)

    Administered by:

    Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)

  • Ateneo de Davao University

    E. Jacinto St.

    With Funding Support from the

    University Research Council (URC)

    Administered by:

    Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)

    District 2

    n=210

    District 1

    n=210

    District 3

    n=210

    Ateneo de Davao University

    E. Jacinto St.

    With Funding Support from the

    University Research Council (URC)

    Administered by:

    Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)

    Sub – District Number of

    respondents

    Poblacion 68

    Talomo 142

    Agdao 42

    Bunawan 54

    Buhangin 106

    Paquibato 8

    Baguio 20

    Calinan 45

    Marilog 25

    Toril 71

    Tugbok 49

    Total 630

  • Ateneo de Davao University

    E. Jacinto St.

    With Funding Support from the

    University Research Council (URC)

    Administered by:

    Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)

    Ensuring Integrity

    of Data

  • 1. Proper screening of enumerators & training.

    2. Training of field supervisors.

    3. Feedback mechanisms.

    4. GIS-Geographic Information System

    With Funding Support from the

    University Research Council (URC)

    Administered by:

    Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)

    Ateneo de Davao University

    E. Jacinto St.

    With Funding Support from the

    University Research Council (URC)

    Administered by:

    Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)

  • GIS – Geographic

    Information

    System

    SDAPS

  • PLOTTING

    Ateneo de Davao University

    E. Jacinto St.

    With Funding Support from the

    University Research Council (URC)

    Administered by:

    Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)

  • Outline of Presentation• Socio-Demographic Characteristics

    • Household Facilities/Amenities

    • Health

    • Environment and Disaster preparednessPart 1

    • Labor Force Status and Profile

    • Financial Situation

    • Self-Rated Poverty and Economic Trend Indicators

    Part 2

    • ASEAN 2015

    • Peace and Order

    • Social issues

    • Governance and Post elections

    • Happiness

    Part 3

    Ateneo de Davao University

    E. Jacinto St.

    With Funding Support from the

    University Research Council (URC)

    Administered by:

    Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)

    Ateneo de Davao University

    E. Jacinto St.

    With Funding Support from the

    University Research Council (URC)

    Administered by:

    Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)

  • SOCIO DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE

    Ateneo de Davao University

    E. Jacinto St.

    With Funding Support from the

    University Research Council (URC)

    Administered by:

    Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)

  • Age Youngest: 18 years Oldest: 89 yearsMedian: 43 years old

    3%

    7%

    10%

    9%

    13%

    10%

    9%

    10%

    9%

    13%

    3% 3%

    0%

    2%

    4%

    6%

    8%

    10%

    12%

    14%

    18-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-70 71-75 76+

  • 20%

    71%

    7%

    Single Married Common Law

    Civil Status

  • CLASS OF DWELLING

    AB6%

    C29%

    D45%

    E20%

    6%

    26%

    45%

    22%

    8%

    31%

    46%

    15%

    4%

    30%

    45%

    21%

    0%

    5%

    10%

    15%

    20%

    25%

    30%

    35%

    40%

    45%

    50%

    AB C D E

    District 1

    District 2

    District 3

  • 78%

    1%

    10% 9%

    0% 2%

    77%

    3%6%

    9%

    1% 0%

    78%

    1%

    10% 9%

    0% 2%0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    80%

    90%

    Ownhousehold

    Rights Renting Owned byrelatives

    Owned byemployer

    Owned bygovernment

    District 1

    District 2

    District 3

    Home Ownership

  • Lot Ownership Rental Fee (House and/or lot) per month:Ave: P4, 050Min: P100Max: P8, 000

    52%

    5%

    15%10%

    1%

    11% 12%

    32%

    6% 4%7%

    1%6% 7%

    59%

    5%7%

    18%

    2% 4% 3%

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    Own household Rights Renting Owned byrelatives

    Owned byemployer

    Owned bygovernment

    Owned byother people

    District 1

    District 2

    District 3

  • 6%

    10%

    16%

    28%

    1%

    5%

    20%18%

    7%8%

    16%

    22%

    1%

    8%

    23%

    14%

    10%12%

    14%

    30%

    3%

    15% 15%

    0%

    5%

    10%

    15%

    20%

    25%

    30%

    35%

    No FormalEducation

    SomeElementary

    CompletedElementary

    Some HighSchool

    CompletedHigh School

    SomeVocational

    CompletedVocational

    SomeCollege

    CompletedCollege

    PostCollege

    District 1

    District 2

    District 3

    Educational Attainment

  • 86.03%

    3.81%

    3.33%3.17% 3.5%

    Bisaya

    Tagalog

    kalagan

    Cebuano

    Others

    Language Used at Home

    37.46%

    23.65%

    6.83%

    7.62%

    1.90%

    2.54%

    1.90% 1.27%

    1.59%

    1.27%

    1.43% 1.27%

    11.20%

    Dabawenyo

    Cebuano

    Ilongo

    Boholano

    Kagan

    Bagobo

    Bisaya

    Waray

    Kaulo

    Surigaonon

    Mandaya

    Tagalog

    Others

    Ethnicity

    Others:Bicolano, Aklanon,Batangueno,Dyangan,Klata,Leyteno,Manobo and Zamboangeno

  • 74%

    2%

    5%

    6%

    13%

    Roman Catholic

    Iglesia ni Kristo

    Protestant

    Islam

    others

    Religion

    Others: Adventist, Born Again, Alliance, Jehovah's Witness

  • HOUSEHOLD FACILITIES

  • Running water into the home

    89%

    80%

    68%

    11%

    19%

    31%

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    80%

    90%

    100%

    District 1 District 2 District 3

    YES

    NO

    95% Billed5% Not Billed

  • Water quality

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    Better Same Worse Don’t know/cant tell

    51%

    42%

    5%1%

    41%

    49%

    10%

    1%

    50%

    40%

    8%

    1%

    District 1

    District 2

    District 3

  • Source of Drinking Water

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    Gripo Delivery Spring Ulan Others

    68%

    20%

    11%

    5%

    Gripo

    Delivery

    Spring

    Ulan

    Others

  • 87%

    13%

    Household with rainwater collector

    n=195

    Yes

    No

    31%

    69%

    Yes No

    0%

    20%

    40%

    60%

    80%

    District 1 District 2 District 3

    20%27%

    46%

    80%73%

    54%

    Yes

    No

    Use of

    Rainwater

  • 12%

    88%

    Shared

    Owned

    Toilet

    24%

    75%

    1% 1%

    Flush

    De-Buhos

    Direstso sa kinalotnga Yuta

    Diretso sa Tubig

    Antipolo

    others (Ilog)

    Types of Toilet

  • Household Electricity Connection

    Electric consumption:Median: P 925.00

    Max: P 16 000

    94%

    5%

    With Electricity

    Without Electricity

    Billed99%

    Not Billed

    1%

    Light Source (5%):Kerosene, Solar, Genset and Candles

  • 28%

    38%

    1%

    26%

    12%

    7%3%

    39%

    45%

    2%

    17%

    6% 5%3%

    72%

    17%

    1%

    13%

    2%

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    80%

    Firewood Gas/LiquefiedPetroleum Gas

    Kerosene Lamp Kahoy na Uling Bagol na Uling Butane Others (Bagaso,

    Electricalcooking

    apparatus)

    District 1

    District 2

    District 3

    Household Energy Sources

  • 21%

    79%

    Yes No

    Awareness on Renewable Energy

  • 9%

    91%

    Yes No

    For those who have telephone connection (n=58)

    Telephone Connection

  • Cellular phone ownership

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    80%

    1 to 2 3 to 4 5+ None

    73%

    2% 1%

    24%

    16%

    43%14%

    12%

    15%

    Network subscription (n=607)

    Globe

    Smart

    TnT

    TM

    ABS-CBNMobileSun

    Number of household

    members with cellular phones

    n= 630

    (%)

    Less 5 83

    5-8 13

    9+ 2

    No answer 2

  • TV and Cable Subscription

    12.8%

    87.2%

    Cable

    Without

    cable

    90%

    10%

    WithTelevision

    WithoutTV

    For those with television

    n=567

    59%

    41%

    Yes No

    Radio Ownership

  • Television and radio usage

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    Daily, 3+ hrs a

    day

    Daily,1-2 hrs a

    day

    Daily, less

    than 1hr a day

    A few days a

    week

    Never

    68.9

    19

    5.9 5.3

    0.9

    36.3

    26.3

    9.9

    23.7

    3.8

    TV

    Radio

  • Vehicle Ownership

    44

    56

    With Vehicle None

    26.7

    11.6

    58.5

    1.4

    9

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    4-wheeledVehicle

    3-WheeledVehicle

    2-WheeledVehicle

    Banca Bicycle

    Type of vehicle owned4-wheeled Vehicle 3-Wheeled Vehicle 2-Wheeled Vehicle Banca Bicycle

  • 75%

    9%2%

    19%22%

    8% 10%

    2%

    69%

    10%3%

    26%

    36%

    17%

    7%2%

    51%

    1%

    55%

    22% 20%

    3% 2%0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    80%

    District 1

    District 2

    District 3

    Mode of Transportation

  • HEALTH

  • 76%

    24%

    Yes No

    Do you consider yourself healthy?

    If yes, Reasons n=476

    Absence of Illness 86%

    Able to sleep well 12%

    Absence of Problem 11%

    Happy 9%

    Has peace of mind 7%Good relationship with

    community 6%

    Contented with life 5%

    Good attitude4%

    others 4%

    Have Money 1%

    If No, Reasons n=152

    Has illness 85%

    Has problem 5%others (Old age,

    unhealthy lifesyle, just recently underwent a

    surgery)

    5%

    Does not have money 3%

    Cannot sleep well 1%

    No peace of mind 1%

    Not contented with life0%

  • 40%

    60%

    Yes No

    Family Members who got sick for the past 6 months

    Family member who got sick in the last 6 months

    n=254

    Mother31%

    Son 28%

    Daughter25%

    Father20%

  • 33%

    18%

    36%

    2%

    6%

    9%

    8%

    1%

    1%

    3%

    3%

    0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%

    Ubo

    Sip-on

    Kalintura

    Diarrhea

    Hubak

    High Blood

    Diabetes

    Sakit sa panit

    Sakit sa atay

    Sakit sa bato

    Sakit sa baga Ubo

    Sip-on

    Kalintura

    Diarrhea

    Hubak

    High Blood

    Diabetes

    Sakit sapanit

    Illness of family members who got sickn=254

    How was the

    sickness cured?n=254

    Sought Medical

    Help 74%

    Self Medicates26%

    Albularyo3%

    Ignored the Illness2%

    Went to the Health

    Center 2%

  • 49%

    37%40%

    5%

    10%

    5% 2% 1%

    5%

    52%

    42%

    40%

    2%

    13%

    6%

    61%

    30%

    46%

    4%

    8% 7%

    5%1%

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    Ubo Sip-on Kalintura Diarrhea Hubak High Blood Diabetes Sakit sa panit Sakit sa atay Sakit sa bato Sakit sa baga

    District 1

    District 2

    District 3

    Common Illnesses in the Community

  • Air Cleanliness

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    Better Same Worse Don’t know/can’t tell

    43%40%

    16%

    1%

    39%43%

    17%

    1%

    51%

    33%

    14%

    1%

    District 1

    District 2

    District 3

  • 79%

    21%

    Yes No

    84%

    18%

    Yes No

    Awareness of HIV Prevalence in Davao City(n=498)

    Awareness on HIV

    51%48% yes

    no

    Awareness of Testing Facilities

    Sources of Informationn= 218

    (%)

    TV 77

    Radio 14

    Health Center 12

    Neighbors 11

    Internet 6

    Newspaper 5

  • DISASTER PREPAREDNESS

    Ateneo de Davao University

    E. Jacinto St.

    With Funding Support from the

    University Research Council (URC)

    Administered by:

    Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)

  • Hazards in the community

    0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

    Flood

    Drought

    Ipo-Ipo

    Landslide

    none

    Fire

    typhoon

    others

    48%

    6%

    1%

    39%

    10%

    3%

    3%

    38%

    8%

    1%

    6%

    52%

    10%

    3%

    3%

    36%

    19%

    1%

    11%

    42%

    10%

    3%

    3%

    District 3

    District 2

    District 1

    Others:brownout,balod, earthquake, liki sa dalan

  • 25%

    75%

    Participated in Disaster Training

    yes no

    Training Provider( multiple response)

    n=158

    Barangay 61911 15School 8Red cross 9Workplace 7

    Others ( church, NGOs)7

    Drills given in the community( multiple response)

    n=157

    Fire drill 57

    Earthquake drill 52

    Tsunami drill 11

    Storm drill 14

    flood drill 38

    Violence response 6

    First Aid 7

    Disaster orientation, response, prevention

    8

  • Preparation for disaster (multiple response)

    0%

    5%

    10%

    15%

    20%

    25%

    30%

    35%

    40%

    45%

    50%

    Stock foodand water

    Stockcandles,

    Flashlight

    Made houserepairs

    Radio tofollow news

    Safe place torelocate

    Stockmaterials for

    flood

    46%48%

    25%

    30%

    14%

    23%

    Stock food and water

    Stock candles, Flashlight

    Made house repairs

    Radio to follow news

    Safe place to relocate

    Stock materials for flood

  • Satisfaction with Disaster Services

    Very satisfied (%)Somewhat Satisfied(%)

    Somewhat dissatisfied (%)

    Very Dissatisfied (%)

    Church 58.4 18.7 3.2 4.0

    PNP58.3 17.0 3.8 3.8

    City Govt55.4 23.5 3.2 5.9

    DSWD52.9 18.3 6.0 5.6

    Brgy Official 42.7 27.8 7.9 10.3

    Private organization 30.5 22.1 7.5 8.9

    DPWH 22.7 6.2 5.9 5.9

  • ENVIRONMENT

    Ateneo de Davao University

    E. Jacinto St.

    With Funding Support from the

    University Research Council (URC)

    Administered by:

    Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)

  • Climate change management initiatives

    Series1

    0%

    20%

    40%

    60% 51%

    28%45%

    21% 23%19% 19%

    Waste segregation

    Recycling

    Tree Planting

    No burn Trash

    No burn Plastic

    Conserve electricity

    Conserve water

  • Cleanliness of Davao City

    76%

    20%

    2% 1%0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    80%

    Better Same Worse Don’t know/cant tell

    Better

    Same

    Worse

    Don’t know/cant tell

  • Awareness on Watershed Protection, Conservation and Management Ordinance of Davao City

    41%

    59%

    Yes No

    City’s Perceived Compliance on Watershed Protection, Conservation and Management Ordinance of Davao Cityn= 258

    59%

    41%

    Yes

    No

  • 0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    Strongly agree Agree Disagree StronglyDisagree

    Don’t Know

    30%

    41%

    21%

    4% 4%

    42%

    49%

    5%

    1%3%

    39%

    52%

    4%3%

    38%

    47%

    9%

    2% 4%

    Our water source in Davao City willnot be depleted.

    There is a need to rehabilitate ourwatershed .

    I have responsibility in rehabilitatingthe water source .

    I am willing to pay for therehabilitation of our watershed .

    Perception on Watershed Protection

  • Who has the greatest responsibility to rehabilitate watershed?

    n= 630

    (%)

    Ordinary Citizens 42.4

    LGU 32.7

    Nat'l Govt 25.2

    DCWD 1.6

    Others ( Myself, God, DENR) 0.5

  • Heard about Organic Products?

    66%

    34%

    Yes

    No

    31%

    69%

    Buy organicProducts

    Do not buyorganic products

    Purchase of Organic Products

  • Organic products

    Type of organic productsn=130 Where the product is purchased? n=130

    Vegetables 62 Specialty Store 27

    Fruits 28 Supermarket 28

    Rice 20 Market ( Bankerohan, Calinan, Panabo,

    Agdao) 15Pork Meat 5Organic Bazaar 14

    Fertilizers10 Neighborhood ( Backyard gardening) 7

    Organic beverages and

    medicines 5Direct Supplier ( Farm, Farmers

    association 3Chicken Meat

    4others ( online, friends, delivery) 3Eggs

    2

    Others2

  • LABOR FORCE STATUS AND PROFILE

  • Work Status

    40.0%

    50.0%

    10.0%

    47.0% 39.0% 14.0%

    40.5%

    44.8%

    13.3%

    Has a job Does not have a jobright now but had a

    job before

    Never had a job

    District 1 District 2 District 3

    27%

    52%

    67%

    58%

    38%32%

    Has a job Does not have ajob right nowbut had a job

    before

    never had a job

    FEMALE MALE

  • 11.50%

    5.40% 5.40%

    77.70%

    0.00%

    10.00%

    20.00%

    30.00%

    40.00%

    50.00%

    60.00%

    70.00%

    80.00%

    90.00%

    1-3 months 4-6 months 6-12months

    more thana year ago

    Last time Davaoeño had job (n=278)

    40.23

    59.77

    yes no

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    Not working but looking for work (n=348

  • 1.4

    25.5

    11.5

    1

    41.3

    7.2

    2.4

    4.3

    1.4

    0 10 20 30 40 50

    Waiting to be called back for theOLD job

    Too young/too old

    Retired

    Physically handicapped

    Busy with Household chores

    Schooling

    Tired of looking for a job

    Problem with Health

    Pregnancy

    Reason for not looking for Job (n= 208)

    12.6

    3

    3.7

    23

    6.7

    48.1

    3

    0 10 20 30 40 50

    never had a job before

    did not voluntarily leave job

    Laid off from work

    contract ended, not renewed

    employer closed operations

    voluntarily left old job

    waiting for result of application

    Classification of looking for work (n=135)

  • 60

    40

    yes

    no

    Available to have a job in the next two weeks (n=167)

    84

    16

    yes

    no

    Willing to start a job in the next two weeks (n=106)

  • Among those working (n= 270)

    53.6

    42.7

    2.2

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    29.73

    34.45

    28.57

    39.86

    32.77

    42.86

    30.4132.77 28.57

    0.00

    5.00

    10.00

    15.00

    20.00

    25.00

    30.00

    35.00

    40.00

    45.00

    Hired Self-employed Unpaid family worker

    District 1 District 2 District 3

  • 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14%

    Construction ( carpenters, mason, welder, machine…

    Online and computer servicing

    Vending

    Service Provider ( Manicure, pedicure, laborer,…

    Farming ( farmers, farm laborers, etc)

    Government Employees

    Licensed ( Engrs. Teachers )

    Others

    Driver

    Security (security guard, military auxiliaries)

    Teacher

    Proprietor( Business owners, sari-sari store)

    Sales ( Agents, sales lady, Bantay Tindahan)

    Self-employment ( Photogrpaher, lanscape artists, )

    Private employees

    8%

    2%

    4%

    8%

    11%

    6%

    6%

    2%

    13%

    5%

    2%

    9%

    8%

    8%

    8%

    MAIN OCCUPATION

  • Type of Employment n % %

    Private Enterprise 100 38.61

    REHISTRADO 99

    HINDI REHISTRADO 1

    Self-Employed 119 45.95

    REHISTRADO 20.72

    HINDI REHISTRADO 79.27

    Government 33 12.74

    Unpaid Family Worker 7 2.7

    0 10 20 30 40 50

    professional/technician

    Manager

    Community worker

    clerical/admin/sales

    refused to answer/noanswer

    Non Agri/Skilled

    Agriculture

    Blue Collar

    22.3

    0.7

    7.4

    10.1

    2.7

    6.8

    5.4

    44.6

    If hired, what type of work (n=140)

  • sari-sari store + Vegetable store

    24%

    Vending (food,catering, fish)

    14%

    (Ukay-ukay +online Business)

    3%

    Farming23%

    Driving16%

    Service(vulcanizing, manicure, pedicure, painting,

    landscaping, dressmaking/tail

    oring)13%

    Others7%

    Type of Business of the self-employed (n=119)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    SSS PhilHealth Pag-Ibig

    24

    32.5

    13.3

    76

    67.5

    86.7

    YES NO

    Whether Davaoeño paid…

  • Benefit received in the past three months (multiple response)

    29.1

    31.1

    8.8

    53.4

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60

    Regular Salary Increase

    Productivity Bonus

    Additional Benefits

    No benefits at all

    35.1

    64.9

    yes

    no

    Wanted to increase working hours? (n=262)

    Min. number of hours of work: 1Maxi. number of hours of work: 168Median: 48

  • 0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    80%

    yes no

    26%

    74%

    Whether looking for additional Work (n=270)

    0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

    Need more income

    Numerous loans

    Can not buy my NEEDS

    Can not spend for liesure

    I have maintenance for illness

    I have obligation

    33%

    4%

    55%

    55%

    3%

    16%

    Reasons for looking additional work (multiple response)

  • 67%

    12%

    6%

    15%

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    More No change Fewer Jobs Refused toAnswer

    Perceived availability of Jobs next year

    25.221.7

    47.8

    5.2

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    Easy to find Neither easynor hard to

    find

    Hard to find Don't Know

    Ease or difficulty in finding a Job today

  • 22.54%

    77%

    Yes

    No

    0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

    Aspiration to live abroadYes

    No

    14.3%

    85.6%

    Yes

    No

    0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

    Looking for a job abroad YesNo

    49%

    21%

    20%

    10%

    Easy to find

    Neither easy nor hard to find

    Hard to find

    DK/no answr

    Easy to find Job inDavao City in 12 months

  • OFW Family

    20%

    78%

    2%

    Yes No No answer 4

    9

    22

    34

    31

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    Father Mother Son Daughter Others

    Others: aunt/uncle, in-laws, grand children

  • 20.8%

    51.2%

    4.0%

    16.8%

    7.2%

    How Hired?n=125

    Direct Hiring

    Agency

    Walk-in

    Referral

    others (DK, Marriage,Descendants)

    Agency Fee: Median: P 30,000Max amount: P 200,000

  • Singapore and

    Malaysia

    Japan and

    Korea

    UAE,

    Kuwait and

    Saudi

    Arabia

    USA and

    Canada

    In what country are they

    working?

    North America

    22%

    Europe

    5%East Asia

    14%

    Middle East

    50% Southeast Asia 8%

    Seafarer

    2%

    France and

    London

  • 41%

    25%

    10%

    23%

    Often Sometimes Seldom Never

    Frequency of sending remittance (n=125)

    Remittance

    Allocation

    (n=125)

    Food 60.2%

    Utilities 53.7%

    Education 41.5%

    Health 22.8%

    Transportation 19.5%

    Payment for Loans 13%

    Savings 10.6%

    Entertainment 10.6%

    Others 4.1%

  • Monthly Family Income

    Median: P9,100Max: P400, 000

    Monthly Individual Income

    Median: P5,500Max: P340, 000

    Income Allocation (n=148)

    Food 93.8

    Utilities 77.9

    Education 58.3

    Transportation 41.9

    Payment for Loans 21.4

    Health 18.4

    Savings 15.9

    Entertainment 11.6

    Others 4.1

  • FINANCIAL SITUATION

  • 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

    Income is not enough

    Just enough

    With savings

    27%

    61%

    12%

    Financial Situation in the past three months

  • 87

    13

    Yes No

    Efforts to reduce Expenditure (n=148)

    12%

    37%

    3%

    2%

    13%

    33%

    0% 10% 20% 30% 40%

    Past savings

    Loans

    Government

    Private Firms

    Relatives

    Sideline

    Sources of additional funding (n=148)

  • 0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    Income notenough

    Just enough With savings

    19.5

    60

    20.5

    15.7

    50.4

    8.7

    2.6

    17.4

    9.6

    Past savings Loans Government

    Private assist Relatives Sideline

    Perceived financial situation in the next three months

    Source of funds for next three months (multiple response)

  • Financial Assistance received

    12%6%

    16%3%

    3%

    4%

    64%

    57%

    Money Money (loaned/borrowed)

    Food Non- Food

    Job Schooling Support

    Any Service None

    57

    43 yes

    no

    Had loan in the past year

    How many loans last year?

    Minimum: 1Maximum: 365Median: 2

  • 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

    Money

    Goods / Appliances

    Food

    Equipment for busness

    79%

    9%

    14%

    1%What is loaned? (multiple response)

    0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%

    Cooperative

    Bank

    Credit card

    SSS/GSIS/PAG-IBIG

    Paluwagan

    others (Motorcyle shop, sari sari store)

    Friends

    Five six

    Microfinance

    20%

    5%

    1%

    4%

    5%

    5%

    24%

    24%

    12%

    Who is the lender (n= 360)

  • 81.5

    18.5

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    Yes No

    Borrow from cooperative (n=114)

    18

    82

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    Yes No

    Member of a cooperative

    78.4

    24.7

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    Personal Business

    Purpose of borrowing (n=114)

  • 8

    92

    Yes

    No

    Attempted to loan from the bank

    25

    75

    Yes

    No

    Refused by the bank (n=52)

  • 4

    96

    Yes

    No

    Whether with credit cards

    Minimum: 1Maximum: 6

    0 20 40 60 80

    Personal

    Gadget

    Travel

    Clothes

    Food

    Business

    Equipment

    Travel

    75

    8

    17

    17

    33

    46

    13

    4Use of credit cards (n=24)

  • 34%

    66%

    Yes No

    Whether with savings

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    31%

    12%

    3%

    53%

    1%

    Where the savings are placed (n=213)

  • 10

    9

    16

    71

    1

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

    others ( for the future, self, driverslicense, entertainment

    For emergency purposes

    Investment

    Education

    Business

    Reason for saving (multiple response)

    13.9

    58.5

    27.4

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    Can notsave

    Not easynor difficult

    to save

    Difficult tosave

    Perception on savings in the next three months (n=213)

  • 10.5

    20.8

    44.9

    23.5

    19.7

    4.8

    6.2

    1.7

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

    Arts and crafts

    Mech Skills

    carpentry

    automotive

    entreprenurial

    computer programming

    food technology

    computer secretarial

    30.6

    1.6

    31.9

    41.1

    water mineral land Don't Know

    Common skills in the community (multiple response)Resources in the community

  • 35

    7

    2

    10

    6

    34

    3

    3

    41

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60

    Agricultural

    fishery

    forestry

    industry

    manufacturing

    construction

    communication

    finance

    small scale business

    Usual sources of income in the community

  • 22

    78

    Yes NO

    Whether a training on business was given in the community

    11.8

    64

    5.1

    2.9

    14.7

    9.6

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

    NGO

    Barangay

    academe

    church

    private

    Government ( TESDA, DOLE, DTI,Military, DSWD [4Ps])

    Who provided the training?

  • VII- SELF-RATED POVERTY

  • Perceived poverty status

    3 3 3.2 3 5.6

    82 8086 84

    80.7

    15 1711 13

    13.7

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    CWSS 1 CWSS 2 CWSS 3 CWSS 4 CWSS 5

    Not poor On the line Poor

  • Perceived poverty status across districts

    8.65.7

    2.2

    82.980.5 78.5

    8.613.3

    18.8

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    District 1 District 2 District 3

    Not poor On the line Poor

    Desired Minimum monthly income: Ave: P12,317

  • Experience Hunger

    17.3

    82.7

    Yes NO

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    District 1 District 2 District 3

    16 14

    21.4

    84 86

    77.6

    Yes NO

    Experience Hunger across Districts

  • Past six months there is a widening gap between the rich and poor

    33

    47.5

    13.2

    2.24.1

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    50

    Stronglyagree

    agree disagree Stronglydisagree

    DK

    Responsibility of Davao City local government to close the gap

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    Stronglyagree

    moderatelyagree

    moderatelydisagree

    stronglydisagree

    CWSS 3

    CWSS 4

    CWSS 5

  • ECONOMIC TREND INDICATOR

  • Quality of Life

    24%22.10%

    33%

    25.80%

    34.0%

    51% 50.20%

    43%

    51.90%

    45.1%

    23%26.40%

    24%

    22.30% 20.0%

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    CWSS 1 CWSS 2 CWSS3 CWSS 4 CWSS5

    Better now than 6 months ago Same as before Worse now than 6 months ago

  • Quality of Life in three Districts

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    50

    Better now than 6months ago

    Same as before Worse now than 6months ago

    Don’t know refused toanswer/no answer

    33.8

    48.1

    18.1

    4041.4

    17.6

    1

    28.1

    44.76

    24.29

    1.43 0.48

    District 1

    District 2

    District 3

  • Personal optimism

    3632.7

    44.8 45.4

    50

    35

    43.3 42

    47.1

    32

    14 12.7 13.2

    7.650

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    CWSS 1 CWSS 2 CWSS 3 CWSS 4 CWSS 5

    Will be better Same Will be worse

  • 51%

    41.20%

    57%54.90%

    73%

    36%

    42.60%

    33%

    38.50%

    14%12%16.20%

    9%6.60%

    2%0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    80%

    CWSS 1 CWSS 2 CWSS3 CWSS 4 CWSS5

    Will be better Same Will be worse

    Perception on the local economy

  • ASEAN INTEGRATION 2015

    Ateneo de Davao University

    E. Jacinto St.

    With Funding Support from the

    University Research Council (URC)

    Administered by:

    Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)

  • ASEAN Integration

    ASEAN Integration will have positive effect on Mindanao? n = 119

    77.30%

    6.70%

    16%

    Agree

    Disagree

    Don't know

    19%

    81%

    yes

    no

    Awareness on ASEAN Integration n = 630

  • ASEAN Integration

    Mindanao is ready for ASEAN Integration

    69.70%

    12.60%

    17.70%

    Agree

    Disagree

    Don't know

  • Greatest threat to Peace and Order

    22%

    17%

    17%

    14%

    13%

    10%

    7%

    Drugs

    Killings

    Poverty

    Criminal Incidents

    Davao Death Squad

    Calamity

    Terrorism

  • Highly complied ordinances

    80.50%82.90%

    69.00%

    83.30%80.50%

    76.70%

    70.50% 71.00%

    62.90%

    73.80%76.70%

    68.10%

    84.30% 85.70%

    79.50%

    District 1 District 2 District 3

    Anti

    discrimination

    ordinance

    Women's

    Development

    Code Ordinance

    Anti-smoking

    ordinance

    Liquor Ban

    Ordinance

    Anti-Nuisance

    Ordinance

  • Least Complied Ordinances

    Halal Food Certification Ordinance 24.6%

    Rainwater Harvesting Ordinance 41.1%

    Speed Limit Ordinance 47.6%

  • Improvement on Infrastructure and Social Services

    48.6%43.2% 43.2% 35.6%

    30% 34% 32% 29%

    53%

    32.1%34.8% 31.3%

    30.0%32%

    34% 36%28%

    31%

    11.1% 13.7% 13.8%14.0%

    15%15% 13%

    15%

    5%

    5.7% 6.3% 8.1% 10.6% 14% 11% 13% 14%7%

    Roads,

    Bridges,

    Drainage

    Public

    School

    Public

    Hospital

    Public

    Parks

    Electric

    Power

    Garbage

    Disposal

    Transport

    services

    Traffic

    system

    911

    Services

    Huge improvement Somewhat better Same Worsen

  • GOVERNANCE

    Ateneo de Davao University

    E. Jacinto St.

    With Funding Support from the

    University Research Council (URC)

    Administered by:

    Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)

  • Satisfaction on Performance of Government Officials

    42% 45%49% 48.10%

    51%

    83%

    99%91% 90% 87%

    58% 55%51% 51% 50%

    17%

    1%9% 10%

    13%

    Satisfied Not Satisfied

  • Satisfaction on Performance of Government Officials

    Satisfied%

    Not Satisfied%

    Net Satisfaction%

    Pres. Benigno Aquino 42 58 -16

    National Administration 45 55 -10

    Senate 49 51 -2

    Supreme Court 48 51 -3

    House of Representatives 51 50 1

    District Representative 83 17 66

    Mayor Rodrigo Duterte 99 1 98

    Vice Mayor Pulong Duterte 91 9 82

    Davao City Council 90 10 80

    Barangay Officials 87 13 74

  • Davao City local government addresses

    concerns of ordinary people

    90%

    5% 5%

    Agree

    Disagree

    No opinion

  • Is there a fair justice system in the Philippines?

    4%

    68%

    28%

    yes no don't know

  • Opinion about Davao Death Squad

    8% 8% 10%

    2%

    60%

    12%

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    against humanrights

    unjust just immoral will help solvecriminality

    others

  • Opinion about Davao Death Squad

    8% 9%10%

    2%

    58%

    13%

    7% 7%10%

    2%

    63%

    11%

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    against human

    rights

    unjust just immoral can solve

    criminality

    others

    male female

  • SOCIAL ISSUES

    Ateneo de Davao University

    E. Jacinto St.

    With Funding Support from the

    University Research Council (URC)

    Administered by:

    Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)

  • Important Social Issues Davao City

    n=630%

    District 1n=210

    %

    District 2n=210

    %

    District 3n=210

    %

    1Corruption 61.0

    56.21st

    66.7

    3rd

    59.01st

    2Unemployment 60.0

    54.82nd

    68.6

    2nd

    56.22nd

    3Drugs 59.2

    53.33rd

    69.5

    1st

    54.83rd

    4 HIV-AIDS 54.9 49.0 62.4 52.9

    5

    Environmental Protection

    54.450.0 61.0 51.9

    6 Access to justice 52.1 45.7 60.0 50.0

  • Common Good

    72.4%

    57.8%

    42.2%

    49.4% 51.7%

    41.6%

    Availability of job Availability offood

    no poverty there is peace equal opportunityfor development

    there is unity

  • POST ELECTIONS

    Ateneo de Davao University

    E. Jacinto St.

    With Funding Support from the

    University Research Council (URC)

    Administered by:

    Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)

  • Electoral Participation

    74%

    26%

    Voted last May 2016

    n=630

    Yes No

    42%

    34%

    62%

    44% 44%

    7%

    Voting is a wayto speak my

    mind

    One vote reallycounts

    Voting caneffect change

    Voting is mypublic duty

    I want toexercise myright to vote

    I'm interestedin politics

    Reasons for votingn=468

  • Reasons for not votingn=162

    2%

    6%

    5%

    5%

    2%

    29%

    14%

    6%

    5%

    54%

    vote will not make a difference

    parties/candidates are the same

    not interested in politics

    not enough information

    candidates do not represent my issues

    name is not on the voter's list

    no time

    lines are too long

    don't like the candidates

    not registered

  • Perception on May 2016 Election

    Agree96%

    Disagree1%

    Don’t know

    3%

    The election in Davao City was peaceful

    Agree56%

    Disagree39%

    Don't know

    5%

    The election in Mindanao was peaceful

  • Perception on May 2016 Election

    95%

    1%

    4%Agree

    Disagree

    Don'tknow

    The election in Davao City was orderlyn=468

    The election in Mindanao was orderly

    56%40%

    4%Agree

    Disagree

    Don'tknow

    The election in Mindanao was orderlyn=468

  • Perception on May 2016 Election

    88%

    6% 6%

    Agree

    Disagree

    Don't know

    The COMELEC in Davao City was credible

    88%

    6%6%

    Agree

    Disagree

    Don't know

    The COMELEC in Davao City was competent

  • Perception on May 2016 Election

    81%

    4%15% Agree

    Disagree

    Don't know

    BEIs were very helpful during the election

    81%

    5% 14%Agree

    Disagree

    Don't know

    Poll watchers were effective in their duty

  • Perception on May 2016 Election

    75%

    13%

    12%

    Agree

    Disagree

    Don't know

    VCM made the voting process efficient

    92%

    4% 4%

    Agree

    Disagree

    Don't know

    Election results were released in a timely manner

  • Perception on May 2016 Election

    92%

    4% 4%

    Agree Disagree Don't know

    Election results truly reflected the will of the Filipinos

    86%

    2%12%

    Agree

    Disagree

    Don't know

    I believe the new administration will value my vote

  • Perception on May 2016 Election

    95.10%

    0.20%4.70%

    Agree Disagree Don't know

    I am more hopeful after the election

  • Voter’s Choice for President

    99%

    1%

    Rodrigo Duterte others

    Whom did you vote as President last May 9, 2016?

    n=468

    Others: Grace Poe, Mar Roxas, Jejomar Binay, Miriam Santiago

    67%

    20%

    76%

    5%

    3%

    51%

    track record

    academic qualification

    leadership abilities

    candidate's political party

    endorsement of outgoingPresident

    platforms

    What made you decide to vote the preferred presidential candidate?

  • Voter’s Choice for Vice President

    9%

    29%

    60%

    0% 0% 2%

    Whom did you vote as vice president last May 9, 2016?

    Robredo

    Marcos

    Cayetano

    Trillanes

    Honasan

    Escudero

    52%

    22%

    54%

    14%

    5%

    44%

    16%

    Reasonsn=465

  • When in i t ia l and f ina l dec is ion to vote the preferred pres ident was made

    Initial decision %

    Final decision%

    On filing of Candidacy 75 69

    3 months before election 5.6 6.9

    2 months before election 3.2 3.9

    3 weeks before election 5.3 3.9

    2 weeks before election 1.5 1.1

    1 week before election 0.9 2.4

    night before election 3.4 5.4

    day of Election , outside precinct 1.7 3.0

    day of election, inside precinct 1.3 2.4

    NA 0.6 1.5

    Refused to answer 19.2 19.1

    Ateneo de Davao University

    E. Jacinto St.

    With Funding Support from the

    University Research Council (URC)

    Administered by:

    Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)

  • Voter’s considerations in making the final decision

    53.80%

    46.70%

    41.90%

    22.20%

    19.40%

    19.40%

    7.70%

    7.50%

    2.20%

    1.30%

    Candidate’s stand on issues

    Perception about the candidate

    Leadership abilities

    Candidate promotes my priority issues

    Candidate’s better chances of winning

    My region/province

    Others' perception of candidate

    Family/peer influence

    Church endorsement

    Party affiliation

  • 39%

    27.30%

    24.50%

    21.30%

    17.90%

    16.40%

    8.10%

    8.10%

    7.70%

    7%

    6.20%

    4.70%

    3.20%

    2.10%

    Television

    Political debates

    Political advertisements

    Family

    Political Surveys

    Social media

    Campaign flyers

    Local talk/ tsismis

    Friends

    Miting de avance

    Campaign sorties

    Church

    Voters' education

    Celebrity endorsement

    What influenced voter’s final decision?

  • Willingness to support the new President

    Yes, 98.9%

    no , 0.2% Don't know, 0.5%Refused to answer,

    0.5%0.0%

    20.0%

    40.0%

    60.0%

    80.0%

    100.0%

    120.0%

    Yes no Don't know Refused to answer

  • Type of support committed for the President

    62%

    38%

    25%

    40%

    63%66%

    35%

    26%

    36%

    65%

    58%

    41%

    23%

    44%

    61%

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    Participate inintiatives for

    common good

    Will notencourage

    corrupt practice

    Pay my taxes Not involve incriminal activities

    Will not violateordinances and

    laws

    Davao City

    Female

    Male

  • Political actions of the incoming President that will disappoint supporters

    73%

    29%

    27%

    27%

    19%

    7%

    13%

    10%

    3%

    corruption

    cannot address peace and order

    lack of transparency

    cannot generate employment

    cannot stop criminality against persons

    cannot stop criminality against property

    cannot address discrimination

    failure to make admin officials accountable

    refused to answer

  • HAPPINESS

    Ateneo de Davao University

    E. Jacinto St.

    With Funding Support from the

    University Research Council (URC)

    Administered by:

    Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)

    Ateneo de Davao University

    E. Jacinto St.

    With Funding Support from the

    University Research Council (URC)

    Administered by:

    Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)

  • Extent of Happiness

    Ateneo de Davao University

    E. Jacinto St.

    With Funding Support from the

    University Research Council (URC)

    Administered by:

    Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)

    Not happy at all Not totally happy Moderately happy Extremely happy

    Legend:

    = 10%

    = 1%

    1.1%

    2.4%

    62.7%

    33.8%

  • Reasons for Happiness

    relationshipwith friends

    relationshipwith

    community

    relationshipwith family

    health position atwork

    religion sense of selfworth

    71%

    15%8% 8% 8% 6%

    2%

  • The City Wide Social Survey Series 5With Funding Support from the

    University Research Council (URC)

    and

    Administered by the

    Social Research Training and Development Office

    Ateneo de Davao University

    Thank You!