CITY OF KINGSTON REPORT TO COUNCIL · 2014-04-10 · REPORT TO COUNCIL Report No.: 14-146 April 15, 2014 - Page 2 - Based on the population projections, available and potential of

CITY OF KINGSTON REPORT TO COUNCIL

Report No.: 14-146 TO: Mayor and Members of Council FROM: Lanie Hurdle, Commissioner, Community Services Jim Keech, President and CEO, Utilities Kingston RESOURCE STAFF: Sheldon Laidman, Acting Director, Planning and Development DATE OF MEETING: April 15, 2014 SUBJECT: Urban Growth Boundary Update EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City of Kingston is required to review its population, housing and employment projections every five years which feeds into the update of the City’s Official Plan. Council approved these projections in early 2014. The projections are utilized to review the need for long term urban growth which also contributes to the update of the Official Plan. It is important to note that the City’s Official Plan is due to be updated in 2015. The purpose of this report is to provide an assessment of the status of the City’s current urban boundary and to recommend appropriate urban residential growth as well as the appropriate servicing infrastructure to support the future growth. The assessment involved a review of the background associated with the development of the City’s urban boundary and the requirements and impact of the Provincial Policy Statement. It also required reviewing the secondary planning process and servicing infrastructure upgrades required for residential development and/or redevelopment. Through the review process, staff took into consideration information from the population, housing and employment projections as well as the “Pending and Committed Applications”, estimated number of dwelling units that may be developed on the currently vacant urban lands, and elements that affect the timing of the future urban development and redevelopment. The assessment identified that there would technically be approximately 19,600 dwelling units that could be accommodated within the current urban boundary if there was a total 100% build out of all available lands. Although the City’s Official Plan and the City’s Strategic Plan promote infill and intensification within urban boundaries, in its assessment, staff assumed that not all lands located within the current boundary will be developed. Staff also recognizes that some development will achieve much higher densities than what is identified in the Official Plan.

Council Meeting 14 April 15, 2014 1

REPORT TO COUNCIL Report No.: 14-146 April 15, 2014

- Page 2 -

Based on the population projections, available and potential of available lands as well as the average number of building permits issued in the past years, staff have determined that there are currently sufficient available lands to meet the population and housing needs projections until 2031. However, information collected and assessed would support that the land available within the urban boundary could support growth until 2041. The Provincial Policy Statement provides a 20 year time frame for projections. The available lands for development and redevelopment included within the urban boundary include significant properties such as the Alcan District, Collins Bay Penitentiary land and Cloggs Road, which will require a secondary plan, and for which the owners have not yet expressed an interest in developing the properties. It is important to note that secondary planning exercises could take up to 10 years and the City will have to approach property owners to see if they want to be engaged in the planning process. Staff would also encourage the City to consider innovative strategies to promote the development of these properties as they are critical in maintaining the current urban boundary. As per the City’s Official Plan policies and the City’s Strategic Plan, staff recognize the importance to promote and support residential intensification and infill. Maintaining the urban boundary as it is currently defined will enable the City to prioritize intensification and infill developments in the downtown area, in Williamsville, along the Princess Street corridor and key properties such as the Davis Tannery. Intensification and infill support corporate objectives such as environmental sustainability, use of existing infrastructure by limiting urban sprawl, economic sustainability by limiting additional operational expenditures and increasing the residential tax base. In order to enable the proposed intensification and infill within the existing urban boundaries, the City needs to ensure that there is appropriate servicing and infrastructure. City staff and Utilities Kingston have worked together to review the water and sanitary capacity that would be required to meet the potential intensification and infill that is proposed until 2031. Utilities Kingston has identified that major upgrades and renovations are required to the Portsmouth Pumping Station and forcemain, Days Road Pumping Station forcemain and Cataraqui Bay Waste Water Treatment Plant as well as a number of local service system upgrades. The total estimated cost for the major upgrades is about $124M. Without these major upgrades, it will be impossible for the City to accommodate growth including intensification in the Williamsville area, west end and downtown, therefore not meeting the objectives of the Official Plan including the newly added Williamsville Main Street policies. It should be noted that the expansion and refurbishment of the Point Pleasant Water Treatment Plant is currently underway. Although not included in this report, the Transportation Master Plan that is being completed by the Engineering Department will be integrated within the plans of supporting intensification and infill within the urban boundary. It is also important to note that the recommendations contained in this report will form the basis for a number of infrastructure requirements included the development charges/impost fee review update which is underway with completion expected this summer.



- Page 3 -

Staff recognize that although the priority and the recommended investment will support intensification and infill within the urban boundary, it is possible that development will not occur as quickly as anticipated and therefore urban growth requirements will be reviewed in five (5) years or sooner should staff identify major changes in growth trends through ongoing monitoring. The three (3) Future Development Areas identified in the Official Plan located beyond the current urban boundary are also subject to secondary planning as well as a comprehensive analysis. If one or more of these areas were required by 2031, then the secondary planning exercise would have to be underway by 2021. The urban boundary does not have to be shifted to initiate and complete the secondary planning of these areas. In fact, the secondary planning analysis would develop a phasing program to guide the development. RECOMMENDATION: THAT the City of Kingston not amend the Official Plan to move the location of the urban boundary and not initiate a comprehensive analysis of the future growth areas; and THAT the City promote intensification and infill within the urban boundary; and THAT the City monitors the progress of the potential number of dwelling units as it moves through the planning and infrastructure servicing system and periodically updates the rate of growth and the housing supply and demand balance; and THAT the City approaches the owners of the Alcan District, Collins Bay Penitentiary and Cloggs Road properties to discuss the potential for undertaking a secondary plan on their lands leading to development; and THAT the City continue to work towards the completion of the Princess Street Corridor planning studies and continue to be involved in the secondary planning for the 752 King Street (Psychiatric Hospital Lands) and the 401/Sydenham Road areas; and THAT the City complete a preliminary review of the three future areas of growth outside the current urban boundary; and THAT the estimated costs associated with infrastructure requirements for water and wastewater infrastructure be included in the Development Charges/Impost Fee review update and long term comprehensive financial plans; and THAT the boundary confirmation be used for the purposes of completing the Transportation Master Plan update in 2014.



- Page 4 -

AUTHORIZING SIGNATURES:

________________________________________ Lanie Hurdle, Commissioner, Community Services ________________________________________ Jim Keech, President and CEO, Utilities Kingston _______________________________________ Gerard Hunt, Chief Administrative Officer

CONSULTATION WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMISSIONERS:

Cynthia Beach, Corporate and Strategic Initiatives N/A

Denis Leger, Transportation, Facilities and Emergency Services N/A

(N/R indicates consultation not required)


hwoodland

Signed by Commissioner

hwoodland

Signed by Utilities

hwoodland

Signed by CAO


- Page 5 -

OPTIONS/DISCUSSION: The purpose of this report is to provide an assessment of the City’s current urban boundary and to recommend appropriate urban residential growth and servicing infrastructure requirements. In order to appropriately assess the status of the current urban boundary the following matters will be discussed in this report:

• The requirements and impact of the Provincial Policy Statement; • The secondary planning process for preparing lands for residential development and/or

redevelopment; • An outline of the population and dwelling unit projection to the horizon year of 2031 for

the City and the demand generated for new urban area housing; • An estimate of the supply of dwelling units that are currently accounted for as Pending

and Committed Applications; • An estimate of the supply of dwelling units that may be developed on currently vacant

lands; • A consideration of some of the elements that affect the timing of future urban

development and redevelopment; and • Servicing capacity and infrastructure upgrades required to enable residential/commercial

and industrial intensification and infill. A. Provincial Policy Statement 2014 and Official Plan Urban Growth Update Approach The Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) has just been updated to 2014. While there are a number of changes that have been made, the PPS still has a strong focus on settlement areas and housing. It still requires that the municipality maintain a supply of residential lands. The two (2) key housing policies are as follows:

• “maintain at all times the ability to accommodate residential growth for a minimum of 10 years through residential intensification and redevelopment and, if necessary, lands which are designated and available for residential development”; and

• “maintain at all times where new development is to occur, land with servicing capacity sufficient to provide at least a three-year supply of residential units available through lands suitably zoned to facilitate residential intensification and redevelopment, and land in draft approved and registered plans”.

As well as maintaining an ongoing supply of residential dwellings, the PPS requires that the City’s growth projections be no further into the future than 20 years. These policies mean that on one hand the City must maintain a residential dwelling supply but on the other hand it cannot project beyond 20 years or the current horizon year of 2031, according to population projections based on 2011 census data. At this time, the City must complete an update of some of the Official Plan’s urban growth elements. The update is undertaken for the purpose of reviewing the potential number of dwelling units. It also reviews the PPS 10 and 3 year dwelling unit reserves that are located



- Page 6 -

within the current urban boundary to ascertain that they are still being accommodated. If the dwelling unit potential is found to be insufficient, a comprehensive study may have to be initiated and a shift in the boundary considered. The preparation of the urban growth update is intended to provide an opportunity for Council to assess the progress of the City’s urban development and to identify the City’s strategic growth alternatives to 2031 which will involve a number of initiatives. B. Secondary Planning for Future Development The initiation of the secondary planning process should follow the urban growth update and must be undertaken by the City prior to any development taking place in either of the Future Development Areas designated in the Official Plan or in any of the secondary planning areas located within the urban boundary. The secondary planning process is really an exercise in community building and the municipality, on behalf of all citizens, usually takes the responsibility for carrying out the secondary planning process. This process must be completed before any development may take place. The cost of doing the plan may be absorbed by the City or it may be covered up front by the City and recovered from the developers at the time of development.

1. Secondary Plans Within the Current Urban Boundary There are six (6) secondary planning areas; two (2) special study areas; the Princess Street Corridor studies and an industrially designated site where a secondary plan is necessary in order to undertake and complete an appropriate land use and servicing planning exercise (refer to Exhibit E). Regardless of the fact that these lands are located within the urban boundary, they must be put through a secondary planning exercise. This process is long and detailed with many participants and could take up to 10 years from the time a secondary plan file is opened to the issuance of the first building permit. The timeframe required for these secondary plans is a crucial element to take into consideration in maintaining the PPS required 10 and 3 year reserves. The six (6) areas located within the urban boundary (Exhibit E) and targeted in the Official Plan for secondary planning include the following lands:

1. The Collins Bay Penitentiary lands 2. The 752 King Street West (Kingston Psychiatric Hospital) lands 3. The Sydenham Road/401 area 4. The Alcan District residential lands 5. The Westbrook East/Creekside Residential Area 6. Cloggs Road



- Page 7 -

It should also be noted that the Princess Street Corridor studies are on-going with another segment scheduled for initiation in 2014 and the Williamsville Study completed in 2013-2014. These secondary planning exercises are part of the urban infill and potential intensification program that is being considered as one of the urban growth strategies under review. However, these lands are currently private properties and are under the control of their respective owners. The development of these lands must wait until the owner or owners make the decision to initiate the development process. A secondary plan undertaken without the owner’s consent or participation is rarely successful. There also may be strategies or incentives that the City could investigate to stimulate development.

2. Secondary Planning for the Future Development Areas Outside of the Urban Boundary Although staff assessment in this report does not recommend expanding the urban growth boundary, the City’s Official Plan does include three (3) Future Development Areas that are designated (Exhibit E). The three areas include the Mile Square Area and the Westbrook North area to the west and the St. Lawrence Community to the east. The preparation of a secondary plan for any of these three areas does not require an expansion of the urban area or a change to the urban boundary. It is only when a comprehensive analysis is done that the boundary can be changed. The secondary plan, however, may indicate a development phasing program that could then be used to fulfill, in part, some of the rationale required by the comprehensive analysis and could provide a mechanism to move the urban boundary incrementally. C. Population, Dwelling Unit and Household Size Projections The Meridian Planning and The Centre for Spatial Economics population projections identified three City of Kingston projection scenarios including: a low case, a medium or base case and a high case. This report focuses on the base case projections, which was endorsed by Council and will be included in the updated Official Plan, to assess the population growth and numbers of dwelling units that the City may have to accommodate by the year 2031 (Exhibit A). The consultants projected the City’s overall population increase, the number of dwelling units, the population cohorts, the number of households, the average size of the households and the employment numbers and rates. The projections were principally based on the 2011 Statistics Canada Census information. The base case projected population is anticipated to increase by 24,550 persons and the numbers of dwelling units are expected to increase by 11,800 units:

• 2011 – 123,410 persons • 2011 – 52,010 urban dwelling units • 2031 – 147,960 persons • 2031 – 63,810 urban dwelling units

In order to accurately project the numbers of dwelling units that would be required to meet the needs of the City’s urban population in 2031, the dwelling unit count had to be adjusted to 2013



- Page 8 -

to account for construction between June 2011 and December 2013. The average of the building permits issued per year between 2004 and 2013 is 673 dwelling units per year. The number of dwelling units built between June 2011 and December 2013 is as follows:

• June 2011 to December 2011 – 333 dwelling units (estimated for half a year) • January to December 2012 – 631 dwelling units (actual) • January to December 2013 – 771 dwelling units (actual)

Total number of dwelling units constructed as measured by building permit activity to the end of 2013 is 1,735 dwelling units. Therefore, the adjusted dwelling unit increase between 2013 and 2031 is 10,065 units which would have to be built between 2013 and 2031 to accommodate the projected populations. It is also interesting to note that the household projections to 2031 are anticipated to shrink in terms of persons per household. They decrease from 2.37 persons in 2011 to 2.32 persons in 2031. If the population projections are constant but the numbers of persons per household are going down, then it will take more dwelling units to house the same number of people. D. Potential Urban Area Dwelling Unit Supply There are two principal land sources that could be taken up to provide for potential future urban dwelling units. The first source includes those lands located within the urban area that have pending and committed residential development applications already in process. The second source involves the vacant lands located within the urban area that are residentially designated in the Official Plan that have development potential and that are not currently in use. Underutilized properties were not included in the inventory because there was a land use already located on the site. The established use may look temporary to the City but that is not necessarily the opinion of the owner. Although there is a potential for underutilized properties to be redeveloped with higher densities, such as recent applications downtown and in Williamsville, these lands cannot be counted on to become available to accommodate growth. In order to test the potential dwelling unit supply against the projected population and required dwelling units, all of the lands had to be assigned a dwelling unit count. The dwelling unit counts both for the pending and committed applications and the vacant lands have to be treated carefully because they are theoretical numbers and may not be realized as built out residential projects. It is not reasonable to expect a 100% build out of all lands because they are private properties and are subject to the desires and decisions of the owners. Staff also recognize that in some cases, developments will exceed the densities prescribed in the Official Plan, therefore creating more dwelling units than accounted for in the numbers included in this report. The dwelling unit count calculations are as follows:



- Page 9 -

1. Pending and Committed Development Applications as of December 31, 2013

The Pending and Committed Applications as of December 31, 2013 are still in process and some are still at the proposal stage (refer to Exhibits B and C). The dwelling unit count indicated by the applications is as follows: 1. Committed Registered Plan of Subdivision – 803 dwelling units 2. Committed Site Plans – 222 dwelling units 3. Approved Draft Plan of Subdivision – 610 dwelling units 4. Submitted Plan of Subdivision Applications – 2,991 dwelling units 5. Submitted Site Plan Applications – 443 dwelling units 6. Cataraqui West Master Plan – 1,807 dwelling units

There is a total of 6,876 dwelling units proposed and in process.

2. Vacant Urban Residential Lands as of February 27, 2014

The vacant lands shown on the map (attached as Exhibit D) are all located within the City’s current urban boundary. They have been divided into four (4) main categories based on their Official Plan designation and/or policies and the process required to prepare them for eventual development. In order to estimate the potential number of dwelling units that these lands might yield, each property’s gross and/or net land area was measured. The second step was to convert the gross land areas, where applicable, to a net development land area and apply an appropriate residential density. There is a total net land area of vacant and mixed use residential lands located within the current urban boundary of 301.35 ha net. The net land areas were then converted to dwelling units by applying an appropriate residential density as set out in Section 2 of the Official Plan. A theoretic total of 12,713 dwelling units could be developed on the vacant lands and the commercial/mixed use properties if all the lands were 100% built out.

3. Other Vacant Lands Cited on Table 5 of the Vacant Lands Map

There are another six hundred and sixty-three (663) parcels of residentially designated urban land listed as vacant by the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation (MPAC) and measuring a combined total of 43.4 hectares in area. These parcels are less than one (1) hectare in area and many are consolidated with abutting residential lots as parking and yard areas or are remnant parcels that are too small to be buildable. Given the number of parcels, their size and scattered locations, they were not included as vacant lands with significant development potential although property owners could redevelop these properties and it could add to the number of dwelling units available.

There are also forty-six (46) parking lots shown on the Vacant Urban Residential Lands map. Many of these lots are City-owned and form a part of the City’s Central Business District parking system. These lots were not included because they are currently being used and are not technically vacant.



- Page 10 -

4. Total Urban Dwelling Unit Potential @ 100% Build Out

When the 6,876 dwelling units of the Pending and Committed Applications are combined with the 12,713 dwelling units that might be developed on the vacant residential lands, it totals a potential of 19,589 dwelling units located in the current urban area, if there were a 100% build out of all of the lands.

E. Vacant Lands Associated With Other Land Uses As part of the whole urban area capacity to accommodate land use growth to the year 2031 and to assist in the Development Charges and Impost By-Law reviews, it was also necessary to review the vacant lands located within the urban area that are designated in the Official Plan for industrial, institutional and commercial purposes. The rate of absorption for these lands per year was not examined for this report because they require a far more specific and detailed analysis which will be undertaken in future studies. However, the area of the vacant lands designated in the Official Plan and indicated in public studies and assessments was found to be as follows:

• Vacant Industrially designated lands – 345.57 hectares • Vacant Institutionally designated lands – 184.87 hectares • Vacant commercially designated lands – 82.92 hectares

F. Qualifications Affecting the Potential for Residential Development It cannot be expected that all of the vacant lands identified in the current urban area will be developed at the same time or in a consistent and orderly progression. Some will be developed in the longer term and some may not move toward development for years to come. The reasons for not proceeding with development are many and varied. One of the most important factors to note is the time requirement of secondary plans and the built out taking up to 10 years. The following properties would appear to fall into the longer term category:

a) Secondary Plans @ 37.5 du’s/net ha (Exhibit D): • Alcan District – 32.8 ha net – 1,230 dwelling units • Cloggs Road – 13.91 ha net – 521 dwelling units • Sydenham Road/401 area – 15.4 ha net – 577 dwelling units • 752 King St. West - 8.73 net ha – 654 dwelling units • Collins Bay Penitentiary – 118.95 ha net – 4,460 dwelling units Total dwelling units subject to secondary planning – 7,442 dwelling units.

b) Special Policy Areas @ 37.5 du’s/net ha (Exhibit D): • Davis Tannery – 7.15 ha net – 268 dwelling units. Proposals and a review by staff

seem to indicate that the number of residential dwelling units could be in the range of 800 units but staff are using the OP calculation in the absence of a formal application at this time. If the higher number materializes it will add to the overall capacity noted in this report.

• Rideau Community Special Study Area – 21.25 ha net - 797 dwelling units.



- Page 11 -

• Elevator Bay – 2.5 ha net – 93 dwelling units • Nortel - 40.7 ha net – 1,526 dwelling units Total dwelling units subject to special policies – 2,684 dwelling units.

There are a total of 10,126 dwelling units that are subject to the secondary planning process and it could take as long as 10 years to get these properties to be building permit ready. With the longer term lands and dwelling units extending out over a period of time, it falls to the pending and committed dwelling unit count and some of the vacant land dwelling units to meet the City’s shorter term housing demands. That leaves a net dwelling unit count as follows:

c) Theoretic Net Shorter Term Urban Dwelling Unit Potential • Total Potential Dwelling Units – 19,589 dwelling units • Total Longer Term Future Dwelling Units - 10,126 dwelling units Theoretical Net Shorter Term Potential Dwelling Units – 9,463 dwelling units.

Of the 9,463 dwelling units anticipated for short term development, 6,876 dwelling units are already in the pending and committed process while 2,587 dwelling units are theoretic short term development lands. Not all of the short term vacant lands can be expected to develop but staff also recognizes that some properties will be redeveloped with higher densities than anticipated and therefore will provide additional dwelling units. Considering this, it is still possible for the shorter term land supply to not meet the required number of dwellings available. For this reason, staff will be monitoring the growth trends as well as initiating secondary planning in the urban boundary and a preliminary review of the three future development areas. G. Infrastructure Implications As part of the preparation of the urban growth update, it was important to review the servicing infrastructure to ensure that it could support the type of intensification and infill that is being supported by the urban growth within the existing boundary. Based on the results of the projected population growth and associated urban serviced land needs, confirmation that sufficient designated land exists within the current urban boundary solidifies a number of important infrastructure decisions. The emphasis on intensification can and will create new demands on existing infrastructure, similar to what has occurred in the Williamsville area. Utilities Kingston has undertaken an assessment of demand that includes development applications filed with the City, proposals involving direct discussions with staff and sites where development potential exists. While local infrastructure upgrades may get triggered by new proposals under intensification proposals which are relatively straight forward to deal with, the cumulative impact of development on existing assets is a bigger concern relative to available capacity. As a result, three major infrastructure projects are critical to ensuring the long term capacity and viability of intensification within the City in order to meet expected demands:



- Page 12 -

1. Cataraqui Bay Waste Water Treatment Plant: expansion of this facility is critical to

ensuring treatment capacity for new effluent flows resulting from growth. The planned expansion is already included in Utilities Kingston’s long term (10 year) capital planning. The Environmental Assessment for expansion has been completed, detailed design has commenced in 2014 with construction scheduled for 2016 subject to budget approval.

2. Portsmouth Pumping Station Flow Reversal: within the central City area sanitary sewer capacity is affected by dry weather flows and wet weather flows (combined sewers). Capacity is required in our facilities to manage both aspects, however, growth predictions (redevelopment and intensification) translated into proposed new sanitary sewage flows indicated that capacity is not available and new development proposals adversely impacted. An Environmental Assessment was undertaken in 2013-2014 to examine the option of reversing the sewage flows from the Portsmouth Pumping Station and redirect them from the Ravensview facility to the Cataraqui Bay facility. This has proven to be a viable solution. The redirection of flows will provide immediate and long term relief to the capacity constraints by creating new capacity at existing assets such as the Harbourfront Trunk Sewer, the King and River Street Pumping stations and at Ravensview. This solution addresses both dry weather flows and wet weather issues associated with Combined Sewer Overflows. Detailed design will commence this year (within previously approved budget) with construction proposed in 2016-2017, subject to budget approvals.

3. Days Road Pumping Station: this station serves a similar critical function to the River Street Pumping Station in that it deals with the majority of sewage flows in the west end. Condition assessment upgrades and capacity expansion have been identified as being required and are planned in our long term capital works programs. Recent infilling proposals involving higher density projects in the west end will continue to drive the importance of this facility work which is currently planned for 2017-2018.

These major upgrades, along with the currently underway project to expand water capacity at the Point Pleasant plant are essential to service the intensification and infill as proposed within the urban boundary. The estimated cost for the three major upgrades noted above is approximately $124M and has been included in the long term capital plans and in the draft impost fees by-laws. H. Urban Growth Support of Other City Analysis and Studies Urban growth information and decisions have an impact on a number of other studies that are currently being updated:

1) Development Charges/Impost Fee Study

The last Development Charges/Impost Fee update in 2009 did not require a full vacant land inventory. The thrust of the Development Charges/Impost Fee review is to identify where development charges/impost revenues are going to come from and how much



- Page 13 -

money will be generated. The Development Charges/Impost Fees update will be based on the future urban growth and required infrastructure and services to support this growth.

2) Industrial Land Update – Review 2006 to 2013 Site Plans

The industrial lands and buildings were inventoried and presented in 2006. They were presented in chart and map form and were based on building permits and site plans. The site plan information will be updated from 2006 to present and will include:

• Information on new construction and renovations to industrial buildings; • Charts showing new building construction and/or renovations by rural and

urban locations; • Property information including a civic address identifier, type of use, lot area in

square metres/ha/acres and building size in sq. metres; and • Confirmation of the built status.

3) Commercial Land Update – Review 2008 to 2013 Site Plans

The Regional Commercial Study/Commercial Inventory and Market Analysis were completed in 2008 and contain not only the commercial buildings and business types but also an inventory of vacant commercial lands. An update of the 2008 study will include:

• Commercial land and building uptake based on Site Plan approvals; • A review of commercial buildings including new construction, renovations and

replacements; • Property information including a civic address identifier, type of use, lot area in

square metres/ha/acres and building size in sq. metres; and • Charts will be provided showing new building construction and/or renovations

and/or replacement with the same type of categories.

4) Institutional Land Review – Review of Site Plans 2006 to 2013 In gathering information for the last Development Charges By-Law, CN Watson and Associates did not require vacant institutional land listings. However, information is being assembled for use in the current updated Development Charges By-Law. Current information may include:

• Vacant institutional lands based on publicly available institutional plans; • The planned new institutional building construction, renovations and

replacements; and • Property information including a civic address identifier, type of use, lot area in

square metres/ha/acres and building size in sq. metres.

5) Transportation Master Plan and Model Update The Transportation Master Plan and Model Update is essentially an engineering and traffic exercise. AECOM has been retained to recalibrate and update the roads network



- Page 14 -

system model. The roads system model is a consideration in the Urban Growth Report to ensure that the appropriate roads would be recognized in the growth analysis. It is anticipated that the updated Transportation Master Plan will be completed in May.

In order to maintain a sufficient number of dwelling units to meet the City’s needs, a multi-pronged approach to urban growth will be required. No one strategy will be successful on its own. The City should continue to promote residential infill and intensification. It must open discussions with the private owners of the secondary planning areas located within the current boundary for the purpose of facilitating and stimulating the development of these lands. In order to approach these people, the City will have to confirm the secondary planning exercise in terms of owner/City roles, the process, the costs involved and the cost recovery process. As well, the City should take responsibility to initiate a preliminary review of one or more of the Future Development Areas in order to provide a long term direction and planning for its residential land use and infrastructure growth. EXISTING POLICY/BY LAW: The Provincial Policy Statement sets out the policies with respect to land supply and availability that the municipality must follow. It also sets out the parameters of a comprehensive review. Section 2.4 of the Official Plan entitled “Phasing of Growth” addresses the questions of urban growth. It contains the “Goal” for guiding urban growth and establishes policies that deal with such matters as residential density targets, residential intensification, and the order of development, the urban boundary, the future development areas, the special planning areas, the comprehensive analysis and the phasing of development. The “Future Development” areas are shown on Schedule 2 to the Plan and are also shown as “Deferred Areas” on Schedule 3-A. The “Secondary Planning Areas” and the “Special Policy Area” are shown on Schedule 13 “Detailed Planning Areas” with specific policies regarding secondary planning set out in Sections 2.1.6 and 9.7.2. The policies governing the land uses are set out in detail in Section3 of the Plan Land Use Designations and Policy”. The Official plan also has policies addressing infrastructure and transportation in Section 4 entitled “Infrastructure and Transportation”. NOTICE PROVISIONS: N/A ACCESSIBILITY CONSIDERATIONS: N/A FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS: Costs associated with infrastructure requirements to support the urban growth strategy will be identified and included in the Development Charges/Impost Fees report currently underway and scheduled for completion within the next few months. It is critical to tie the information from this



- Page 15 -

report and that which will be finalized in the Transportation Master Plan update to the development charges/impost review update and to the comprehensive financial plans of the City. Without the strategic direction and decisions associated with urban growth boundary areas accurate financial planning is not possible, as infrastructure requirements are the most significant costs impacting DC/Impost rates and debt and reserve fund forecasting levels. CONTACTS: Lanie Hurdle, Commissioner, Community Services 613-546-4291 ext. 1231 Sheldon Laidman, Acting Director, Planning and Development 613-546-4291 ext. 3252 Cherie Mills, Manager, Policy Planning 613-546-4291 ext. 3289 OTHER CITY OF KINGSTON STAFF CONSULTED: Gerard Hunt, Chief Administrative Officer Desiree Kennedy, City Treasurer James Miller, Director, Utilities Engineering, Utilities Kingston EXHIBITS ATTACHED: Exhibit A Meridian Planning & C4SE Projections Summary 2011to 2031 Exhibit B Pending & Committed Urban Residential Development Map Exhibit C Pending & Committed Urban Residential Development Charts (3) Exhibit D Vacant Lands within the Urban Boundary (Dec 2013) Map and Charts Exhibit E Secondary Planning Map Exhibit F Princess Street Corridor Vacant Lands Update (2013) Map


EXHIBIT ‘A’ REPORT NO. 14-146

CITY OF KINGSTON PROJECTIONS 2011 TO 2031*

FACTOR BASE CASE PROJECTION HIGH CASE PROJECTION 2011 2031 CHANGE 2011 2031 CHANGE

POPULATION

123,410 147,960 24,550 123,410 154,290 30,880

HOUSEHOLDS

52,010 63,810 11,800 52,010 66,210 14,200

PERSONS PER HOUSEHOLD 2.37 2.32 -.05 2.37 2.33 -.04

DWELLING UNITS 52,010 63,810 11,800 52,010 66,210 14,200

* Source: Meridian Planning and the Centre for Spatial Economics; City of Kingston and Kingston CMA Population, Housing and Employment Projection (Updated October 17, 2013)


28

20

17 14 12

1315 27

24

26

21

6

2

1

3

4 9

7

833

33

35

37

39

40

43

5

34

1023 25

1618 19

22

46

4511

31

30

29

38

50

32

C ol l i

n s B

a y

S t . L a w r e n c e R i v e r

G r ea t C

a ta r

a qu i

Ri v

e r

L a k e O n t a r i o

Norman Rogers Airport

Cataraqui Town Centre

Cataraqui RegionConservation

Authourity

Great Cataraqui Marsh

C o l o n e l B y L a k e

Littl

e Cata

raqu

i Cree

k

Butternut C

reek

Lo

ya

l i st T

ow

ns

hi p

Lo

ya

l i st T

ow

ns

hi p

Ci t y

of K

i ng

st o

n

Ci t y

of K

i ng

st o

n

Riocan Centre

St. LawrenceCollege

Queen's University

SEE DETAIL

401

15

401

2

Kingston WestTreatment Plant

RavensviewTreatment Plant

KINGSTON MILLS RD

YORK ST

ALFR

ED

ST

PALA

CE

RD

HENDERSON BLVD BA

RR

IE S

TUNION ST

ORDNANCE STPOR

TSMO

UTH

AVE

RAILWAY ST

DALTON AVE

VIC

TOR

IA S

T

QU

EEN

MARY

RD

CO

LLIN

S B

AY R

D

BENSON ST

KIN

GS

CO

UR

T AV

E

MIDDLE RD

CONACHER DR

SUTHERLAND DR

WEST ST

OAK ST

LEROY GRANT DR

KING

ST E

CONCESSION ST

DIVIS

ION

ST

PRINCESS ST

SIR

JOHN A. M

ACD

ON

ALD

BLVD

QUEEN ST

JOHNSON ST

BATH RD

BROCK ST

KING ST W

ONTAR

IO ST

MO

NTRE

AL ST

DAY

S R

D

HWY 2STEPHEN ST

TAYLOR-KIDD BLVD

MACROW ST

CENTENNIAL D

R

JOHN COUNTER BLVD

BAT

TER

SE

A R

D

CO

RO

NATIO

N BLVD

SY

DE

NH

AM

RD

MID

LAN

D A

VE

CREEKFORD RD

BUR BROOK RD

LA SALLE CAUSEWAY

BAY

RID

GE

DR

WE

STB

RO

OK

RD

GA

RD

INE

RS

RD

HWY 38

HWY 15

FRONT RD

PER

TH R

D

* For details summary of land composition please see accompanying report

Pending & Committed Urban Residential DevelopmentSubdivisions, Site Plan Applications & Secondary Plans

Source: City of Kingston Residential Planning Applications: Planning & Development Department Building Permit Data: Building & Licensing Department Base Mapping: GIS Department Prepared by: A. DowkerRevised: Dec 2013K:\D31_Geographic Information Resources\Project Data\Building Activity Data\Mapping\2013

4142

4447

48

36

51 54

55

49

5253

YORK ST

ALFRE

D ST

BAR

RIE

ST

BAR

RIE ST

UNION ST

ORDNANCE ST

WEST

ST

PINE ST

ONTAR

IO S

T

PRINCESS ST

VIC

TOR

IA S

T

ALFRE

D ST

VIC

TOR

IA S

T

MO

NTR

EA

L ST

KING

ST

E

DIV

ISIO

N S

T

PRINCESS ST

PLACE D'A R MES

QUEEN ST

JOHNSON ST

BROCK ST

KING ST W

ON

TAR

IO S

T

LA SALLE CAUSEWAY

WEL

LIN

GTO

N S

T

DETAIL - DOWNTOWNDETAIL - DOWNTOWN

0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.60.2km

D iscla im e r: T h is d o cum e n t is sub je c t to cop yrigh t and m ay on ly b e u se d fo r you r pe rsona l, n on -com m ercia l u se p rov ide d you kee p in ta c t th e copy rig h t n o tice . Th e C ity o f K in gs ton a ssum es n o resp on s ib ility fo r a n y e rro rs , a nd is n o t lia b le fo r an y d am ag es o f a n y k in d re su lt in g from th e u se o f, o r re lia n ce on , th e in fo rm a tion con ta in e d in th is d o cum e n t. T h e C ity o f K in g s ton d oes n o t m ak e any re p rese n tation o r w a rran ty , ex pre ss o r im p lie d , con ce rn in g th e a ccu ra cy , q ua lity , lik e ly resu lts o r re lia b ility o f th e u se o f th e in fo rm a tion con ta in ed in th is d o cum en t. C 2 0 13 T he C o rp o ra tion o f th e C ity o f K in g ston .

LEGENDSTATUS

REGISTERED

DRAFT APPROVED

DRAFT PENDING

SITE PLAN APPROVED

SITE PLAN PENDING

SECONDARY PLANURBAN BOUNDARYWASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTWATER FILTRATIONWATER TOWER LOCATIONRAILHYDRO TRANSMISSIONRIVERSMUNICIPAL BOUNDARY

Updated to: December 31, 2013Revised to: February 27, 2014


dcrossman

Typewritten Text

dcrossman

Typewritten Text

Exhibit 'B'

dcrossman

Typewritten Text

dcrossman

Typewritten Text

dcrossman

Typewritten Text

Map No. Development Name Service Area File Number Plan No. Date

Registered SF SD TNH MULT Total SF SD TNH MULT Total SF SD TNH MULT Total

1 Lyndenwood, Phase 3 W D12-069-03M; D27-004-2006; D27-010-2007 13M-58 5/31/2005 198 6 7 0 211 196 6 0 0 202 2 0 7 0 9

2 Westbrook Meadows, Phase 1 W D12-003-2005 13M-64 6/8/2006 94 0 0 160 254 89 0 0 0 89 5 0 0 160 165

3 Forest Park W D12-025-2007 13M-76 6/19/2008 104 0 0 0 104 95 0 0 0 95 9 0 0 0 9

4 Kings Landing, Phase 4 W D12-015-2004 13M-80 11/16/2009 120 30 0 0 150 87 26 0 0 113 33 4 0 0 37

5 Cataraqui Mills W D12-037-2000 1853 12/16/2009 50 0 0 0 50 8 0 0 0 8 42 0 0 0 426 Stirling Bridge River Park C/E D12-028-2007 13M-82 3/16/2010 0 0 144 0 144 0 0 136 0 136 0 0 8 0 87 Woodhaven Phase 1 W D12-046-2009; D27-024-2010 13M-84 7/29/2010 264 2 57 0 323 160 2 57 0 219 104 0 0 0 1048 Greenwood Park West C/E D12-051-2009; D12-059-2011 13M-85 2/22/2012 137 0 0 0 137 71 0 0 0 71 66 0 0 0 66

9 Lyndenwood Phase 4, Stage 5 W D12-031-2007; D12-060-2011 13M-87 6/7/2012 65 0 0 0 65 29 0 0 0 29 36 0 0 0 36

10 Westbrook Meadows Phase 2 W D12-061-2011 13M-89 9/28/2012 29 0 0 0 29 14 0 0 0 14 15 0 0 0 15

11 2939 Creekford Rd W D12-052-2009; D12-072-2012 13M-90 4/11/2013 0 10 65 0 75 0 4 19 0 23 0 6 46 0 5212 1380 Crossfield Ave W D12-030-2007; D12-074-2012 13M-91 8/2/2013 35 0 0 0 35 16 0 0 0 16 19 0 0 0 1913 1 Potter St W D12-053-2009 13M-92 8/2/2013 108 0 34 0 142 3 0 12 0 15 105 0 22 0 127

14 Woodhaven West Phase 1 W D12-065-2011 13M-94 10/8/2013 54 0 45 0 99 3 0 14 0 17 51 0 31 0 82

15 3480 Princess St W D12-071-2012 13M-93 8/22/2013 0 0 20 0 20 0 0 8 0 8 0 0 12 0 12

16 Midland Park Phase 4, Stage 1 W D12-004-2013 13M-96 11/28/2013 26 0 0 0 26 6 0 0 0 6 20 0 0 0 20

137 0 144 0 281 71 0 136 0 207 66 0 8 0 741147 48 228 160 1583 706 38 110 0 854 441 10 118 160 729

1284 48 372 160 1864 777 38 246 0 1061 507 10 126 160 803

Map No. Development Name Service Area File Number SF SD TNH MULT Total

17 Woodhaven West (Remaining Phases) W D12-057-2010 98 10 51 0 159

18 1201 Woodhaven Dr W D12-002-2013 117 0 0 0 11719 River's Edge Phase 2 C/E D12-006-2013 30 0 0 0 30

20 Westbrook Meadows Phase 3 W D12-007-2013 58 0 0 0 58

21 Baxter Farm North C/E D12-009-2013 46 0 0 0 46

22 51 Holden St - Woodhaven Phase 3 W D12-011-2013 51 8 141 0 200

76 0 0 0 76324 18 192 0 534

400 18 192 0 610

Pending & Committed Urban Residential Subdivisions, Site Plans & Secondary Plans

Committed units serviced by Ravenview (C/E)Committed units serviced by West (W)

Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision (Pending Final Approval) **

Total Units

Detailed Development Report (Updated to the end of December 2013)

Registered Plan of Subdivision (Committed for Development) *

Pending units serviced by Ravensview (C/E)Pending units serviced by West (W)

Total Units

Residential Categories

Building Permits Vacant Remaining Residential Categories

E - Kingston East & C- Kingston Central - Serviced by the Ravensview PlantW- Kingston West - Serviced by the West PlantSource: City of Kingston, Planning and Development Department

Residential CategoriesSF- Single FamilySD- Semi Detached DwellingTNH- Townhouse/RowhouseMULT- Multiple Family Dwelling

Note:* Registered Plans of Subdivision with less than 5 vacant units have been removed.** The following inactive development applications have been removed: 1081 Montreal St, Meadowbrook, 293 Parkway Ave, Davis Tannery, Elevator Bay & the Alcan District Secondary Plan*** Highgate Creek, Woodhaven Tamarack, 1140 Maria Avenue, 1 Potter Street, 2939 Creekford Road, 1201 Woodhaven Dr & 51 Holden Street have been discounted from the Cataraqui West Master Plan calculation.

Updated to December 31, 2013


dcrossman

Typewritten Text

Exhibit 'C'

dcrossman

Typewritten Text

Residential Categories Residential Categories

Map No. Development Name Service Area File Number SF SD TNH MULT Total Map No. Development Name Service

Area File Number SF SD TNH MULT Total

23 Highgate Creek W D12-019-2006 96 128 142 0 366 37 770 Progress Ave W D11-192-2008 0 0 0 5 5

24 Midland Park Phase 4, Future Phasing W D12-058-2011 78 0 0 0 78 38 35 Lyons St C/E D11-282-2010 0 0 0 49 49

25 Purdy's Mill W D12-064-2011 0 0 0 705 705 39 780 Division St C/E D11-325-2011 0 0 46 16 6226 1138-1200 Hwy 15 C/E D12-068-2012 262 0 90 0 352 40 471 Cataraqui Woods Dr W D11-364-2011 0 0 0 94 9427 311 Conacher Dr C/E D12-070-2012 0 0 258 0 258 41 155, 157 & 159 Princess St C/E D11-377-2012 0 0 0 6 628 Lydenwood Phase 5 W D12-005-2013 120 6 57 0 183 42 73-75 & 77-79 Brock St C/E D11-378-2012 0 0 0 5 5

29 1350-1370 Woodfield Cres W D12-008-2013 337 0 32 0 369 43 247 Portsmouth Ave C/E D11-380-2012 0 0 0 17 17

30 655 Graceland Ave W D12-010-2013 53 0 0 0 53 44 637-655 Johnson St C/E D11-384-2012 0 0 0 27 2731 3566 Princess St W D12-012-2013 0 0 66 0 66 45 740 Augusta Drive W D11-007-2013 0 0 0 41 4132 1163 Centennial Dr W D12-014-2013 0 0 80 481 561 46 1338 Princess St C/E D11-008-2013 8 0 0 0 8

262 0 348 0 610 47 394-396 Princess St C/E D11-015-2013 0 0 0 20 20684 134 377 1186 2381 48 630 Princess St C/E D11-017-2013 0 0 0 29 29

946 134 725 1186 2991 49 363-365 & 367 Johnson St C/E D11-023-2013 0 0 0 10 10

50 70 Barbara Ave C/E D11-025-2013 0 0 49 0 4951 271,273 & 275 Alfred St C/E D11-027-2013 0 0 0 1 1

52 27 Place D'Armes C/E D11-032-2013 0 0 0 3 3

Residential Categories 53 301-303 Sydenham St C/E D11-035-2013 0 0 0 6 6

Map No. Development Name Service Area File Number SF SD TNH MULT Total 54 136 Princess St C/E D11-038-2013 0 0 0 10 10

33 Cataraqui West *** W D09-009-2004 811 647 349 0 1807 55 110 Centre St C/E D11-039-2013 1 0 0 0 1

34 752 King St West C/E D12-075-2012 9 0 95 199 303

811 647 349 0 1807 0 0 0 140 140

811 647 349 0 1807 9 0 95 339 443

803

Residential Categories 222

Map No. Development Name Service Area File Number SF SD TNH MULT Total 610

35 1586 Bath Road W D11-020-2004 0 0 0 221 221 2991

36 74 Gore St C/E D11-418-2012 1 0 0 0 1 443

1 0 0 0 1 1807

0 0 0 221 221 68761 0 0 221 222Total Units

Total Units

Total units committed by development (Approved Site Plan)

Total units pending for development (Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision)

Total units pending for development (Submitted Plan of Subdivision)

Total units pending for development (Submitted Site Plan)

Total units proposed by Secondary Plans

Summary Urban Area: Potential Dwelling UnitsTotal units committed by development (Registered Plan of Subdivision)

Total Units

Total Units

Application for Site Plan (Pending Site Plan Approval) **

Approved Site Plans (Not Built) **

Pending units serviced by Ravensview (C/E)

Pending units serviced by West (W)

Pending units serviced by the West (W)

Secondary Plans **

Pending units serviced by Ravensview (C/E)

Pending units serviced by West (W)

Application for Plan of Subdivision (Pending Draft Plan Approval) **

Total Units

Pending units serviced by Ravensview (C/E)Pending units serviced by West (W)

N/A



dcrossman

Typewritten Text

Exhibit 'C'

TYPE USE 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013Total # of Units

Average # of Units/Year

% of Total by Building Type

Single Family 440 389 322 439 396 316 343 313 244 206 3,408 341 51%Semi‐Detached 22 40 24 20 46 18 30 27 6 5 238 24 4%Row Housing 26 14 66 78 29 41 37 80 57 88 516 52 8%Multiple 220 285 188 366 43 294 134 246 324 472 2,572 257 38%

TOTAL UNITS 708 728 600 903 514 669 544 666 631 771 6,734 673 100% * Note: due to rounding, total may not equal 100%

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Num

ber o

f Res

iden

tial U

nits

Year

Summary: Combined Urban and RuralNew Residential Building Activity 2004 - 2013

Single Family Semi-Detached Row Housing Multiple

10 year TrendlineRow Housing

10 year TrendlineSingle Detached Housing

Note: Building permit data from 2002-2007 was manually calculated and can be referenced from Report PC-08-84. Building permit data from 2008 - 2013 is based on information from the City of Kingston BuildingDepartment, Cityview. Building permit data includes residential development resulting in the creation of a new unit.

For more information about the Pending and Committed Residential Development Report, please contact the Planning & Development Department at 613-546-4291 ext 3180



dcrossman

Typewritten Text

Exhibit 'C'

4L

4Q

3F

4O

4I

4A

4E

4B

4N

3J 3E4V

1C

4M2A4K

4U4R3D

3C

4H4G

4W

3G

4P4S 4T

4F

4C

4D 3H

4J

1A

3B3A

1B

1E

2B

3I

1D

2C

4X

4Y

Norman Rogers Airport

Cataraqui Town Centre

Cataraqui RegionConservation

Authourity

Great Cataraqui Marsh

C o l o n e l B y L a k e

Little

Cata r

aqui

Creek

Butternu

t Creek

Lo

ya

l i st T

ow

ns

hi p

Lo

ya

l i st T

ow

ns

hi p

Ci t y

of K

i ng

st o

n

Ci t y

of K

i ng

st o

n

Riocan Centre

St. LawrenceCollege

Queen's University

Lemoine's Point

2

15

401

KINGSTON MILLS RD

BAYR

IDGE

DR

PORTSMOUTH AVE

YORK ST

HWY 2

ELLIOTT AVE

KING ST

E

CATARAQUI WOODS DR

ALFR

ED ST

CONCESSION ST

DIVISION ST

BARR

IE ST

PRINCESS ST

PALA

CE R

D

QUEEN STHENDERSON BLVD

UNION ST

JOHNSON ST

BATH RD

KING ST W

ONTAR

IO ST

MONT

REAL

ST

DALTON AVE

BATT

ERSE

A RD

DAYS

RD

STEPHEN ST

TAYLOR-KIDD BLVD

QUEEN MARY RD

CEN T

ENNI

AL DR

BENSON ST

JOHN COUNTER BLVD

KING

SCOU

RT AV

E

CORONATION BLVD

MIDL

AND

AVE

CREEKFORD RD

MIDDLE RD

BUR BROOK RD

PERT

H RD

HWY 401

H WY 15

HWY 15

SIR JO

HN A.

MACD

ONAL

D BL

VD

WEST

BROO

K RD

COLL

INS B

AY R

D

CONACHER DR

GARD

INER

S RD

HWY 38

FRONT RD

SYDE

N HA M

RD

Discounting Industrial Designations, EPA Designations, Parkland, and Land which is Undevelopable

BARR

IE ST

YORK ST

ALFR

ED ST

BARR

IE ST

MONTREAL ST

UNION ST

PINEST

PRINCESS ST

ORDNANCE ST

VICTO

RIA

ST

PRINCESS ST

ALFR

ED ST

VICTO

RIA

ST

KING ST

E

WELL

INGT

ON ST

DIVISION ST

PLACED'ARMES

BROCK ST

ONTA

RIO ST

PRINCESS ST

JOHNSON ST

JOHNSON ST

BROCK ST

QUEEN ST

LA SALLECAUSEWAY

4O

4N

5C

5B 5A

DETAIL - DOWNTOWNDETAIL - DOWNTOWN

0 1 2 3 40.5km

D is c la im e r: T h is do cu m e n t is s u b je c t t o c o p y r igh t a n d m a y o n ly b e u s e d fo r y o u r pe rs o n a l, n o n -c o m m e rc ia l u s e p ro v id e d y o u ke e p in ta c t th e c o py r ig h t n o t ic e . Th e C ity o f K in gs to n a s su m e s n o r e sp o n s ib ilit y fo r a n y e rro r s, a n d is n o t l ia b le fo r a n y d a m a g e s o f a n y k in d re su lt in g fro m th e u s e o f, o r re lia n c e o n , th e in fo rm a tio n co n ta in e d in t h is d o cu m e n t. T h e C ity o f K in gs to n d o e s n o t m a k e a n y re p re se n ta t io n o r w a r ra n ty , e x p re s s o r im p lie d , c o n ce rn in g th e a c cu ra c y , q u a lity , l ike ly re su lts o r re lia b il ity o f th e u s e o f t h e in fo rm a tio n c o n ta in e d in th is d o cu m e n t . C 2 0 1 3 Th e C o rp o ra t io n o f th e C ity o f K in gs to n .

1:33,570

City of Kingston - Vacant Lands within the Urban Boundary (Dec 2013)

TABLE 1: PROPERTIES SUBJECT TO SECONDARY PLANNING

TABLE 3: VACANT INFILL PARCELSIN RESIDENTIAL AREAS > 1 HA

TABLE 6: VACANT SMALL LOT DEVELOPMENT (PARCELS < 1 HA) TYPE # PARCELS AREA (Ha)

CBD PARKING LOTS 46 10.9RESIDENTIAL < 1 HA 663 43.4

TOTAL 709 54.3

LegendMunicipal BoundaryUrban BoundaryEPA Designation

Vacant Lands 2013<all other values>

CategoryCentral Business District- Parking LotsInfill Residential > 1 haMixed UseSpecial Study AreaSubject to Secondary Planning

TABLE 5: NORTH BLOCK

Prepared by: Planning & DevelopmentDate: January 30, 2014Revised to: February 27, 2014

TABLE 2: SPECIAL STUDY AREAS

ID ADDRESS AREA (Ha)5A FRONTENAC PARKING LOT 0.75B DRURY PARKING LOT 0.45C BARRACK PARKING LOT 0.3

TOTAL 1.4

ID ADDRESS AREA (Ha)3A 1138 HWY 15 2.73B 1871 JOHN COUNTER BLVD 12.03C 23 THE POINT RD 1.13D 256 KINGSDALE AVE 1.33E 475 ST. MARTHA ST 1.13F 495 TAYLOR-KIDD BLVD 1.73G ELEVATOR BAY 2.53H FARNHAM CRT 3.53I HWY 2/HWY 15 3.93J WESTBROOK RD/PRINCESS ST 1.5

TOTAL 31.4

TABLE 4: VACANT MIXED USEPARCELS ALONG MAIN CORRIDORID ADDRESS AREA (Ha)1A 752 KING ST W 47.61B ALCAN PROPERTY 50.51C CLOGG'S RD 21.41D PURDY'S MILLS 23.71E COLLINS BAY PENN 183

TOTAL 326.3

ID ADDRESS AREA (Ha)2A RIDEAU COMMUNITY 32.72B DAVIS TANNERY 112C NORTEL 40.7

TOTAL 84.4

ID ADDRESS AREA (Ha)4A 1316-1318 PRINCESS ST 1.04B 1327 PRINCESS ST 0.24C 1712 BATH RD 0.44D 1720 BATH RD 0.24E 1953 BATH RD 1.64F 2215 PRINCESS ST 0.24G 2237 PRINCESS ST 5.94H 2245 PRINCESS ST 0.24I 2255 PRINCESS ST 0.34J 2271 PRINCESS ST 1.04K 2666 PRINCESS ST 1.74L 2724 PRINCESS ST 0.44M 2828 PRINCESS ST 0.94N 555 PRINCESS ST 0.14O 652 PRINCESS ST 0.44P 691 GOLDEN MILE RD 0.14Q 834 PRINCESS ST 0.34R BATH RD/CENTENNIAL DR 2.54S DAYS RD/GOLDEN MILE RD 0.14T DAYS RD/GOLDEN MILE RD 0.14U GARDINERS RD 2.24V PRINCESS ST/SYDENHAM RD 1.84W TAYLOR KIDD BLVD/PRINCESS ST 4.24X PORTION OF 2431 PRINCESS ST 3.54Y PORTION OF 1040 PRINCESS ST 2.74Z 360 SELECT DR 0.3

4ZA 327,333,339 SELECT DR 1.1TOTAL 33.3

Text

K:\D31_Geographic Information Resources\Project Data\Vacant Lands Analysis\Vacant Residential\2013


dcrossman

Typewritten Text

Exhibit 'D'

dcrossman

New Stamp

LENNOX AND ADDINGTON COUNTY

LOYALIST TOWNSHIP

Collins Bay

Horsey Bay

Cataraqui Bay

Deadman's Bay

Cataraq

ui

Lake Ontario

St . Lawrence River

Wolfe Island

River

Navy Bay

Inner Harbour

Great

Colonel By Lake

")

")

!(

")

!(

")

")

")

")

")

")

"

"

"

^

^

Elevator Bay

Central

WestEast

KINGSTON MILLS RD

KINGSTON MILLS RD

PORT

SMOU

TH AV

E

YORK ST

ELLIOTT AVE

ALFR

ED ST

PALA

CE R

D

ALFR

ED ST

COLL

INS B

AY R

D

HENDERSON BLVD

BARR

IE ST

PORT

SMOU

TH AV

E

UNION STUNION ST

ORDNANCE ST

OAK ST

ONTAR

IO ST

PORTSMOUTH AVE

UNION ST

PRINCESS ST

RAILWAY ST

DALTON AVE

ALFR

ED STVIC

TORI

A ST

MIDDLE RD

MIDDLE RD

MIDDLE RD

CATARAQUI WOODS DR

VICTO

RIA S

T

QUEEN MARY RD

VICTO

RIA S

T

KING

SCOU

RT AV

E

DALTON AVECATARAQUI WOODS DR

MONTREAL ST

CONACHER DR

COLL

INS BAY

RD

WOODBINE RDWOODBINE RD

BATT

ERSE

A RD

BAYR

IDGE

DR

KING ST

E

CONCESSION ST

DIVIS

ION

ST

DIVISION ST

WEST

BROO

K RD

QUEEN STBROCK ST

KING ST W

KING ST W

HWY 15

HWY 15

HWY 15

HWY 15

DAYS

RD

GARD

INER

S RD

STEPHEN ST

PRINCESS

ST

HWY 38

HWY

38

TAYLOR-KIDD BLVDTAYLOR-KIDD BLVD

JOHN COUNTER BLVD

FRONT RD FRONT RD

CENT

ENNI

AL

DR

JOHN COUNTER BLVD

CORONATION BLVD

MIDL

AND

AVE

CREEKFORD RDCREEKFORD RD

SYDE

NHAM

RD

SYDE

NHAM

RD

PRINCESS ST

PRINCESS ST

PRINCESS ST

BATH RD

BATH RD

HWY 2

HWY 2

HWY 2

BUR BROOK RD

PERTH RD

PERT

H RD

BAYR

IDGE

DR

BUR BROOK RD

BATH

RD

BATH RD

WELL

INGTO

N ST

BAYR

IDGE

DR

CENT

ENNI

AL DR

SIR JO

HN A.

MACD

ONAL

D BL

VD

HWY 401

HWY 401

SUNNYSIDE

KINGSTONMILLS

St LawrenceCommunity

CataraquiNorth

CreekfordRoad

CataraquiWest

MileSquare

WestbrookEast

Collin's Bay

PsychiatricHospital

Purdy'sMill

Alcan

WestbrookNorth

Nortel

CataraquiEstates

Extension

OldIndustrial

Area

DavisTannery

Secondary PlanningPlanning & Development Departmentµ0 840 1,680 2,520 3,360420

Meters

City of KingstonD isc la im er: Th is do cum en t is sub ject to copy right and m ay on ly be used fo r you r pe rsona l, non-com m erc ia l use p rov ided you keep in tact the copyrigh t no tice . The C ity o f K ingston assum es norespons ib ility fo r any e rro rs , and is no t liab le fo r any dam ages o f any k ind re su lting from the u se o f, o r re liance on , the in fo rm ation conta ined in th is docum en t. The C ity o f K ingston does no t m akeany rep resen ta tion o r w a rran ty , exp ress o r im p lied , concern ing the accuracy , qua lity , like ly resu ltso r re liab ility o f the use o f the in fo rm ation con ta ined in th is docum en t. C 2013 The C orpora tion o f the C ity o f K ingston .

LEGEND" Waste Water Facility!( Water Treatment Plant") Water Storage Facility

Third CrossingPumping Station ConnectionRail

Railway CrossingsRoadway Linkages

Municipal BoundaryUrban Boundary

EPA DesignationPrincess St CorridorSpecial Study Area

Service AreaExistingFuture

Industrial Secondary Planning AreaActive Future

Residential Secondary Planning AreaActiveFuture

Revised to: March 31, 2014


dcrossman

Typewritten Text

Exhibit 'E'

dcrossman

Typewritten Text

401 Sydenham

dcrossman

Typewritten Text

dcrossman

Typewritten Text

dcrossman

Typewritten Text

dcrossman

Typewritten Text

dcrossman

Typewritten Text

dcrossman

Typewritten Text

Road

dcrossman

Typewritten Text

dcrossman

Typewritten Text

AUGUSTA DR

DURHAM ST

NELS

ON S

T

NELS

ON S

T

JOSEPH ST

COLL

EGE

ST

WELLER AVE

QUEEN ST

WILL

INGD

ON AV

E

POWLEY GARDEN

DR

PORT

SMOU

TH AV

E

PORT

SMOU

TH A

VE

MCKA

Y ST

BARR

IE ST

ABER

FOYL

E RD

YORK ST

NAPIE

R ST

JOHNSON STJOHNSON ST

FIRST CANADA AVE

MACD

ONNE

LL S

TMA

CDON

NELL

ST

SYDE

NHAM

RD

RAILWAY ST

ROCK

FORD

PL

ELLIOTT AVE

COLBORNE ST

PRINCESS ST

COPP

ERFIE

LD D

R

GILM

OUR

AVE

VINE S

T

QUEEN MARY RD

UXBRIDGE CRE S

O LD

M ILL

RD

DIVISION ST

DIVIS

ION

ST

CARLETON STBEECH AVE

DIVISION ST

DIVIS

ION

ST

OAK ST

NORTH BARTLETT ST

FRIARHILL CRES

MOHIN

I PL

CONCESSION ST

SOUTH BARTLETT ST

CHAT

HAM

ST

BROCK ST BROCK ST

MALABAR DR

VAN ORDER DR

MAIN ST

ANDE

RSEN

DR MEADOW AVE

EARL ST

LANGFIELD ST

DAVIS DR

DAVIS DR

WATERLOO DR

NORMAN ROGERS DR

ELLICE ST

LANS

DOWN

E ST

ROOS

EVEL

T DR

GRE N

VILLE

RD

PROGRESS AVE

WEST

DALE

AVE

PURDY PL

OLD COLONY RD

HILL ST

ADLE

Y PL

SCOTT ST

DICKENS DR

MARLEY ST

MACK ST

JOHN COUNTER BLVDJOHN COUNTER BLVD

RICHARDSON DR

VICTO

RIA

ST

VICTORIA ST

THIRD AVE

ELLE

SMEE

R AV

E

REGE

NT ST

FIFTH AVE

EDGAR ST

PORT

SMOU

TH AV

E

CROSSFIELD AVE

TORO

NTO

ST

SEVENTH AVE

EMER

ALD

ST

CASTELL RD

BATH RD

BATH RD

DUNDAS ST

FRANKLIN PL

THIRD AVE

FERG

US ST

HOWARD CRES

THER

ESA C

RES

ABER

DEEN

ST

VICTO

RIA

ST

WEST

DALE

AVE

PURDY'S MILL RD

SEALE CRT

DIV ISION PL

GREENVIEW DR

PARK ST

UNION ST

GROSVENOR CRT

OLD QUARRY RD

MACK ST

COLL

INGW

OOD

ST

WILLIAM ST

ALBE

RT S

T

COWDY ST

AVEN

UE R

DYO

NGE

ST

ELM ST

KINGS GATE PL

CHESTNUT ST

CHAMPLAIN AVE

SELECT DR

MACHAR PL

HAMILTON ST

GARD

INER

S RD

GARD

INER

S RD

ELMWOOD ST

WALK

ER C

RT

KIRKPATRICK ST

PURDY'S CRT

ALFR

ED S

TAL

FRED

ST

ELMWOOD ST

SHERIDAN ST

HYPERION CRT

ELDON HALL PL

SPLINTER CRT

PATRICK ST

YORK ST

FAIRVIEW RD

NOTCH HILL RD

BIRCH AVE

HALIF

AX DR

GRETNA GREEN

CENTENNIAL DR

CENTENNIAL DR

SAVA

NNAH

CRT

LINTON ST

PLUM ST

ARLINGTON PARK PL

WIND

WARD

PL

TERRY FOX DR

FRON

TENA

C ST

APP LE DOWN

DR

ALEXANDER ST

GRAH

AM AV

E

WEST

CAMPUS LANE

CONCESSION ST

HELE

N ST

THOMAS ST

JENNIFER CRT

PALA

CE R

D

PALA

CE R

D

NOTTINGHAM PL

GUY ST

SHOP

WAY

SILVER ST

DUNLOP ST

HERITAGE CRT

LORN

E ST

SOMERSET CRES

BATH RD

CONN

AUGH

T ST

CHAD

WICK

CRT

HAMPSTEAD HEATH

KING

SCOU

RT AV

E

GREY ST

MACPHERSON AVE

PICKW

ICK

PL

MOWA

T AVE

MOHAWK PL

FOURTH AVE

BURNETT ST

ELMWOOD ST

MCEW

EN D

R

HICKSON AVE

JANE AVE

QUEE

N MA

RY R

D

NEWCOURT PL

RUSSELL ST

TAYLOR-KIDD BLVD

GARD

INER

S RD

GARD

INER

S RD

RIVE

RMEA

DE AV

E

DEERFIELD DR

ELIZABETH AVE

DIVIS

ION

ST

BAKER CRES

RUSKIN ST

GARRETT ST

OAK AVE

MCEW

EN D

R

VANGUARD CRT

ADELAIDE ST

BARBARA AVE

DALTON AVE

NORWEST RD

PRINCESS ST

PRINCESS ST

PORT

SMOU

TH AV

E

LOCHINVAR RD

KING

SCOU

RT AV

E

PRINCESS ST

PRINCESS ST

PRINCESS ST

GOLDEN MILE RD

NORRIS CRT

DERBY GATE CRES

MULCASTER ST

ABDO

RD

BATH RD

DUFF ST

WHISTLER TERR

CENT

ENNI

AL D

R

CENTENNIAL DR

LYON

S ST

RIGN

EY S

T

MEAD

OWCR

EST R

D

CONACHER DR

COOKE CRES

DEVELOPMENT DR

KIR KWOO D

RD

SIR JO

HN A

. MAC

DONA

LD B

LVD

BATH RD

FLOR

ENCE

ST

RUNNYMEDE RD

LERO

Y GRA

NT D

R

FRASER ST

OAKR

IDGE

AVE

PARK

WAY

MCEW

EN D

R

CAMP

BELL

CRE

S

HARVEY ST

HILL

CRES

T AVE

GRANDTRUNK AVE

BATH RD BATH RD

BATH RD

TAYLOR-KIDD BLVD

TAYLOR-KIDD BLVD

PRINCESS ST

DAYS

RD

DAYS

RD

JOHN COUNTER BLVD JOHN COUNTER BLVD

REDWOOD CRES

ALAM

EIN

DR

KINGSDALE AVE

KINGSDALE AVE

RODE

N ST

SIR J OHN

A. MACDONALD BLVD

ALFRED CRES

LERO

Y GRA

NT D

R

SHERWOOD DR

MAPLE AV

E

WEST AVE

EAST AVE

INDI

AN R

D

INDI

AN RD

CHERRY ST

AUGU

STA D

R

ROBERT WALLACE DR

MCMAHON AVE

CONCESSION ST

SUNRISE

CRES

ALFRED ST

ALFR

ED ST

BYRON CRES

MCMI

CHAE

L ST

HAWT

HORN

E AVE

TANNER DR

TANN

ER D

R

CASTERTON AVE

WHEATHILL ST

BRAN

T AVE

GRAN

DTRU

NK EA

ST AV

E

INVERNESS CRES

OLD OAK RD

DOLSHIRE ST

PIXLEY PL

MELROSE ST

DOUG

LAS A

VE

BRAESIDE CRESMI

DLAN

D AV

ELAPPAN'S LANE

LAPP

AN'S

LANE

FAWN CRT

MUIR FI EL D

CRES

MORN

INGSID

E DR

FERN

MOOR

DR

GLEN

C AIRN

T ERR

ABBO

T ST

RIDLEY DR

ASHL

EY C

RES

HILL

ENDA

LE AV

E

SUMA

C PATH

MILL POND PL

SHIRESWAY

DAY S

T

ARBOUR CRES

MELANIE AVE

CAME

RON

ST

DEDRICK DR

GLENCOE CRES

STOR

MONT

AVE

NICKLE AVE

WEST

MORE

LAND

RD

METCALFE AVE

CLIFF

CRES

STAD

IUM

LANE

WESTVIEW RD

LAKE

VIEW

AVE

L IDDE

LL CR

ES

WYCLIFFE CRESARROWHEAD PL

CHUR

CHILL

CRES

WOLF

E ST

GIBS

ON AV

E

KILLARNEY CRES

OWENS CRES

HICKO

RYWO

OD CR

ES

BROTHLIN CRES

SMITH

FIELD

CRES

ARMS

TRON

G RD

HOLLAND CRES

WRIGHT CRES

CAVENDISH CRES

HERC

HMER

CRES

SWANFIELD ST

JUST

US D

R

SEAFORTH RD

O'CONNOR DR

WEST

ON C

RES

FAIRWAY HILL CRES

HILLE

NDAL

E AVE

2715

2566

2464

2437

2327

1454

1465

1343

970

630

576

2628 2396

2331

23122300

2271 2267

2237

2244

1316

1335

1111

1060

1043

1041

863

811

677

647

620

562

2666

2485

2480

2431

2287

1550

1267

1181

1096

192

1011

993

834

772

691

579

531

521

2658

2500

2467 23392263

2260

2255

1469

1407

1100

900

826

689

766

686

555

450

2648

2451

2288

1390

1399

1036

904

871

945

850

684

659653

520

500 490

356

2698

2511

2456 24482444

2404

2342

2280 2268

1373

1324

1187

1129

1055

1006

914

800

668

641

652 615

573

528

2560

24472395

23942392

2376

2345 2236

2215

1473

1412

1429

1298

1225

1200

1217

1085

835

840 787

681

700

627

600575

506

395

353

2553

24462440

2435

2360

2295

2293

2212

1508

1440

1379

1338

13481323

1260

1274

13091297

1275

1254

1155

1095

1046

920

890

844823

847

793

724

676

671

637

631

611

574

556

561

507

503497

468458

459

493

473

429

430 401

394383

12

17

4

15

3

6

7

2

1016

14

9

8

11

13

5

1

¦THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF KINGSTONPLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

Date: November 12, 20130 300 600 900 1,200150

Meters

PRINCESS STREET CORRIDORVACANT LANDS UPDATE 2013 Legend

Princess St Corridor Planning Area

Williamsville- Sch PS-1

2013 Corridor Vacant LandsMap Document: K:\D31_Geographic Information Resources\Project Data\Princess Street Corridor Studies\Princess Corridor - Vacant Properties_revised_March2014.mxd

1:7,750


dcrossman

Typewritten Text

Exhibit 'F'

Documents

CITY OF KINGSTON REPORT TO COUNCIL · 2014-04-10 · REPORT TO COUNCIL Report No.: 14-146 April 15, 2014 - Page 2 - Based on the population projections, available and potential of