City of Salisbury · 22nd January 2015 until 5pm 20th March 2015 by the public at: City of Salisbury Library, John Street, Salisbury Council Offices, James Street Salisbury Polaris

a)

City of Salisbury

Mawson Lakes DPA

Explanatory Statement and Analysis

For Consultation

Mawson Lakes Development Plan Amendment

City of Salisbury

Table of Contents

b)

Table of Contents

Have Your Say .............................................................................................. 1

Explanatory Statement ................................................................................ 3

Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 3

Need for the amendment ............................................................................................................. 3

Statement of Intent ....................................................................................................................... 4

Affected area ................................................................................................................................ 4

Summary of proposed policy changes ....................................................................................... 6

Legal requirements ...................................................................................................................... 6

Consultation ................................................................................................................................. 7

The final stage .............................................................................................................................. 9

Analysis ....................................................................................................... 11

1. Background .............................................................................................................................11

The Multi-Function Polis (MFP) Concept ........................................................................................................ 11

The MFP Zone .................................................................................................................................................. 11

The MFP (The Levels) Zone.............................................................................................................................. 11

The Mawson Lakes Economic Development Project ...................................................................................... 12

The Current DPA .............................................................................................................................................. 12

The Mawson Lakes Concept ............................................................................................................................ 13

2. The strategic context and policy directions ..........................................................................14

2.1 Consistency with South Australia’s Strategic Plan .................................................................................... 14

2.2 Consistency with the Planning Strategy .................................................................................................... 15

2.3 Consistency with other key strategic policy documents ........................................................................... 17

2.3.1 Council’s Strategic Directions Report ............................................................................................. 18

2.3.2 Infrastructure planning ................................................................................................................... 18

2.3.3 Current Ministerial and Council DPAs ............................................................................................ 20

2.3.4 Existing Ministerial Policy ............................................................................................................... 21

3. Investigations ..........................................................................................................................22

3.1 Investigations undertaken prior to the SOI ............................................................................................... 22


City of Salisbury

Table of Contents

3.2 Investigations undertaken to inform this DPA ................................................................................... 23

3.2.1 Industry ........................................................................................................................................... 24

3.2.2 Transport Corridors ......................................................................................................................... 25

3.3.3 Linkages with Technology Park and the University of South Australia ........................................... 25

3.3.4 Parafield Airport ............................................................................................................................ 26

Building Heights ............................................................................................................... 26

Initiatives from National Aviation Policy - Flight Path to the Future ............................. 28

Public Safety Areas .......................................................................................................... 28

Building Generated Windshear and Turbulence at Airports .......................................... 30

Parafield Airport Master Plan – Cross Keys Precinct ..................................................... 30

3.3.5 Heritage........................................................................................................................................... 32

Background to Indigenous Culture ................................................................................. 32

Background to European Culture .................................................................................... 33

3.3.6 Native Vegetation ........................................................................................................................... 34

3.3.7 Noise ............................................................................................................................................... 34

Road, Rail and Industry Noise ......................................................................................... 34

Parafield Airport ................................................................................................................ 35

3.3.8 Town Centre Retailing and Retailing Analysis ................................................................................. 38

3.3.9 Site Contamination ......................................................................................................................... 39

3.3.10 Mary/Dan Street Area ................................................................................................................... 40

3.3.11 Metropolitan Open Space System (MOSS) and Open Space ........................................................ 41

3.3.12 Residential Density ....................................................................................................................... 42

3.3.13 Mawson Connector, Transport Linkages and Interchange ........................................................... 43

3.3.14 State Planning Policy Library Modules .......................................................................................... 44

3.3.15 Quality Urban Design .................................................................................................................... 44

3.3.16 Water Sensitive Use ...................................................................................................................... 45

3.3.17 Sustainable Development ............................................................................................................. 46

3.3.18 Desired Character Statements ...................................................................................................... 46

3.3.19 Impact if Development Plan not amended ................................................................................... 47

4. Recommended Policy Changes ............................................................................................ 48

5. Consistency with the Residential Code ................................................................................ 49

6. Statement of statutory compliance ....................................................................................... 49

6.1 Accords with the Planning Strategy ........................................................................................................... 49

6.2 Accords with the Statement of Intent ....................................................................................................... 50

6.3 Accords with other parts of the Development Plan .................................................................................. 50

6.4 Complements the policies in the Development Plans for adjoining areas ................................................ 50


City of Salisbury

Table of Contents

b)

6.5 Accords with relevant infrastructure planning ......................................................................................... 50

References/Bibliography ............................................................................ 51

Schedule 4a Certificate................................................................................ 3

APPENDICES ................................................................................................... 4

The Amendment ........................................................................................... 1

Mary Dan Policy Area (Policy area 34 maps 74, 76) ................................. 12


City of Salisbury

Have Your Say

d) 1

Have Your Say

This Development Plan Amendment (DPA) will be available for inspection from the 22nd January 2015 until 5pm 20th March 2015 by the public at:

City of Salisbury Library, John Street, Salisbury

Council Offices, James Street Salisbury

Polaris Centre, Innovation House, Park Way, Technology Park, Mawson Lakes

During this time anyone may make a written submission about any of the changes the DPA is proposing.

Submissions should be sent to John Harry, Chief Executive Officer, City of Salisbury, PO Box 8, Salisbury, SA 5108.

Submissions should indicate whether the author wishes to speak at a public meeting about the DPA. If no-one requests to be heard, no public meeting will be held.

If required to be held, the Public Hearing will be on Tuesday 21st April 2015 at 7.30pm at Council Chambers.


City of Salisbury

Explanatory Statement

f) 3


Introduction

The Development Act 1993 provides the legislative framework for undertaking amendments to a

Development Plan. The Development Act 1993 allows either the relevant council or, under prescribed

circumstances, the Minister responsible for the administration of the Development Act 1993 (the Minister),

to amend a Development Plan.

Before amending a Development Plan, a council must first reach agreement with the Minister regarding the

range of issues the amendment will address. This is called a Statement of Intent. Once the Statement of

Intent is agreed to, a Development Plan Amendment (DPA) (this document) is written, which explains what

policy changes are being proposed and why, and how the amendment process will be conducted.

A DPA may include:

▪ An Explanatory Statement (this section)

▪ Analysis, which may include:

o Background information

o Investigations

o Recommended policy changes

o Statement of statutory compliance

▪ References/Bibliography

▪ Certification by Council’s Chief Executive Officer

▪ Appendices

▪ The Amendment

Need for the amendment

The concept of a mixed-use urban development based in the Gillman area was developed in the early

1990s. The potential to extend this concept was recognised and in January 1994 the responsible State and

Commonwealth Ministers agreed to consider urban development of land at The Levels. Extensive studies

were undertaken leading to an amendment to the City of Salisbury Development Plan to facilitate this

development.

The amendment was enacted in December 1996 by the MFP (The Levels) Amendment Act. That Act

rezoned the land to allow mixed use urban development and amended the former zoning, which included

“Industry”, “Technology Park”, “Commercial”, “Public Purposes (Drainage)”, “Public Purposes (Rail


City of Salisbury


e) 4

Transport)”, “Landscape Buffer”, and “Special Uses”. It created the MFP (The Levels) Zone and the

subsequent provisions in the Salisbury (City) Development Plan.

Some 18 years later, the current development controls in the Salisbury (City) Development Plan for this

area are still the MFP (The Levels) Zone provisions. These provisions were always regarded as an interim

measure, having broad acre land use policies that facilitated and provided guidance to the Master Planning

structure for the development. Detailed development control in the interim has been by encumbrance

controls and Guidelines enforced by the Developer. However, the Mawson Lakes area has now been

substantially developed, with encumbrance controls ceasing in 2015.

It was always intended that a further DPA would be undertaken to introduce more detailed policies to

establish the structure and design of the urban form and ensure its continued development aligned with

the Mawson Lakes concept. However, for various reasons, including the fact that the approach taken to

using encumbrance controls administered and enforced by the Developer has largely proven successful in

this instance, this has not yet occurred. With the impending cessation of the Developer’s involvement in

the control process and the need for Council to assess proposals against the detail in its Development Plan,

it has reinforced that the current policies are limited in their detail to control the types of development

issues that will arise once the encumbrance controls have lapsed.

This DPA therefore proposes to introduce a level of detail into Council’s Development Plan for the Mawson

Lakes area that will enable it to assess development proposals for alignment with the form and character

desired for the area.

In summary, the current MFP (The Levels) policies have not been amended since their inclusion in the

Development Plan in December 1996. It is considered necessary to have detailed provisions in the Salisbury

(City) Development Plan to ensure controls are in place for continued control over the Mawson Lakes area,

providing continuity of standards and meeting community expectations, and enabling a smooth transition

from the encumbrance control system.

Statement of Intent

The Statement of Intent relating to this DPA was agreed to by the Minister on 24th October 2014.

The issues and investigations agreed to in the Statement of Intent have been undertaken or addressed.

Note: The Mawson Lakes DPA was originally initiated in 2007 and underwent consultation with government

agencies in 2012. The original DPA lapsed due to significant delays, and this DPA is the result of re-initiation

in 2014, having incorporated policy changes where necessary to respond to agency issues.

Affected area

The area affected by the proposed DPA is the suburb of Mawson Lakes that is currently zoned MFP (The

Levels). A map of the affected area is provided in Figure 1 below.


City of Salisbury


f) 5


City of Salisbury


e) 6

Summary of proposed policy changes

The DPA proposes the following key changes:

Deletion of the current MFP (The Levels) Zone policies and introduction of the following zones:

o Industry Zone;

o Commercial Zone;

o Open Space;

o Residential Zone, Mawson Lakes Policy Area;

o Mawson Lakes Urban Core Zone, with identification of a ‘core’ and ‘transition’ area to guide the

density outcomes sought within the Zone. Several Policy Areas are proposed within the zone

including Main Shopping, Mawson Innovation and Runway Public Safety;

o Introduction of a map identifying the area subject to the Mawson Lakes Car Parking Fund;

o Identification of the Mary/Dan industrial precinct as a future residential area, and incorporated

into the Residential Zone, Mary Dan Policy Area. Specific policy has been proposed to address

potential interface issues between existing industrial activities and potential future residential

uses; and

o Introduction of a Runway Public Safety Policy Area within part of the Mawson Lakes Urban

Core Zone to limit the range of activities within an identified area immediately south of

Parafield Airport.

Consequential amendments to various Tables, Structure Plans, Policy Areas and Zone Maps to

reflect the introduction of the new zones.

Legal requirements

Prior to the preparation of this DPA, council received advice from a person or persons holding prescribed

qualifications pursuant to section 25(4) of the Development Act 1993.

The DPA has assessed the extent to which the proposed amendment:

accords with the Planning Strategy;

accords with the Statement of Intent;

accords with other parts of council’s Development Plan;

complements the policies in Development Plans for adjoining areas;

accords with relevant infrastructure planning; and


City of Salisbury


f) 7

satisfies the requirements prescribed by the Development Regulations 2008.

Consultation

This DPA is now released for formal agency and public consultation, with the following agencies formally

notified:

Defence SA

Department of Communities and Social Inclusion

Department of Education and Child Development

Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources

Department of Further Education, Employment, Science and Technology

Department of Health and Ageing

Department of Justice

o Police

o SA Metropolitan Fire Service

Department of Manufacturing, Innovation, Trade, Resources and Energy

Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure

o Statutory Planning

o Public Transport Divison

o Transport Services

o Office for Recreation and Sport

Department of the Premier and Cabinet

o Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation

Department of Primary Industries and Regions

o Mineral and Energy

Environment Protection Authority

Renewal SA

South Australian Tourism Commission


City of Salisbury


e) 8

The following agencies, State Members of Parliament, interested parties, individuals and Councils will be

consulted during the consultation stage of the DPA:

Adelaide Airport Limited

Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges NRM

Electranet Pty Ltd

Epic Energy

SA Power Networks

South East Australia Gas Pty Ltd

SA Water

Office of Northern Suburbs

City of Port Adelaide Enfield

City of Tea Tree Gully

City of Playford

Hon Zone Bettison MP, Member for Ramsay

Hon Susan Close MP, Member for Port Adelaide

Hon Jack Snelling MP, Member for Playford

Ms Frances Bedford MP, Member for Florey

Mr Lee Odenwalder MP, Member for Little Para

The Hon Jennifer Rankin MP, Member for Wright

All written and verbal, agency and public submissions made during the consultation phase will be recorded,

considered, summarised and responses provided. Subsequent changes to the DPA may occur as a result of

this consultation process.

Important Note for Agencies: This DPA includes modules from the State Planning Policy Library.

As the policy library was subject to agency consultation during its development, agencies are requested to

comment only on the range and application of the modules selected and not on the actual policy content,

except where that policy has been included as a local addition. Agencies are invited to comment on any

additional issues (if relevant).

Please also note that the DPA was previously released for agency consultation in 2012. Amendments made

in response to agency comments received during the 2012 consultation have been incorporated where

necessary into the draft DPA.


City of Salisbury


f) 9

The final stage

When the council has considered the comments received and made any appropriate changes, a report on

this (the Summary of consultations and proposed amendments report) will be sent to the Minister.

The Minister will then either approve (with or without changes) or refuse the DPA.


City of Salisbury

Analysis

f) 11

Analysis

1. Background

The Multi-Function Polis (MFP) Concept

The Multi-Function Polis (MFP) concept was first proposed by the Japanese Minister for International Trade

and Industry to the Australian Minister for Industry, Technology and Commerce in 1987 (Parker 1998). It

was to be a high technology city for the 21st Century, established in Australia.

The Australian government considered it an opportunity to achieve economic structural change, to develop

internationally competitive export industries through research and technology and to explore new service

industries to meet the Pacific Rim needs. The Japanese were to access international research, extended

exposure to English speaking culture, international business exposure, the application of technology to

lifestyle industries and new experiments in urban development. (Parker 1998).

Four of the six state governments bid for the MFP to be located in their state. The South Australian

proposal of Gillman and Dry Creek was selected in 1990 and the MFP Adelaide Management Board was

formed to investigate and recommend on the site feasibility studies.

The MFP Zone

The Ministerial MFP Australia Supplementary Development Plan was enacted in September 1993 to create

the MFP Zone over the Gillman and Dry Creek area.

In July 1994 the former Multi Function Polis (MFP) Core Site was extended from Gillman to include the

Greater Levels area, which included Technology Park and the Levels campus of the University of South

Australia. Technology Park was the oldest research park in Australia and one of the most successful. (MFP

Australia 1994 cited in Parker 1998) This redirected a large proportion of MFP activities to the Greater

Levels site and away from the more difficult to develop Gillman site.

Changes in the investment location decision-making in the 1990s by Japanese and other companies

expected to be in the new MFP diminished the image of the MFP as an attractive site for international

investment. Federal support lessened and eventually ceased after a change in Federal Government and in

1996 the MFP became a state project.

During 1994 the Delfin Lend Lease Consortium (DLLC) was selected to design Stage One of the MFP urban

development and prepare the business plan. State Cabinet appointed DLLC and MFP Development

Corporation as the Joint Venture development partners in 1996.

The MFP (The Levels) Zone

On the 19th December 1996 the Salisbury Development Plan was amended by an Act of Parliament to

create the current MFP (The Levels) Zone and controls. A Ministerial Plan Amendment Report was

prepared. The PAR area included the extended core site, Technology Park, the Levels Campus of the

University of South Australia and surplus Federal Airport Commission land at Parafield Airport. The


City of Salisbury

Analysis

e) 12

intention was to enable the undertaking of the MFP mixed use urban development by replacing the zoning

of that time with what is now in the Development Plan.

The Mawson Lakes Economic Development Project

In July 1997 the MFP Project officially became known as the Mawson Lakes Economic Development Project

with the signing of the Project Commitment Deed between the State of South Australia, MFP Development

Corporation (now Land Management Corporation), Delfin Mawson Lakes Pty Ltd, Lend Lease Development

Pty Ltd, Delfin Property Group Limited, Lend Lease Corporation Limited, City of Salisbury and the University

of South Australia.

The Business Plan for the Mawson Lakes development required the following:

the construction of 3700 dwellings to accommodate 10,000 people;

120,000 square metres of commercial floor space over 10 years;

progressive development over the 620ha site;

10-12 year construction time frame;

integration with the UniSA Levels campus (5000 students by 2000);

Integration with the companies and facilities of MFP Technology Park; and

focus on the physical and social development objectives of the MFP Development Act.

The size of the MFP had been reduced to match the new local emphasis. Instead of being a city with a

population of 250,000 as first suggested in 1987, Mawson Lakes was now expected to take 10years and

result in a new urban area with a total residential population of 10,000. As of 2012, the current estimate

was 5,500 dwellings, with a population of 13,000.

The Current DPA

In August 1997 the City of Salisbury requested of the Minister for Housing and Urban Development that a

more extensive replacement Plan Amendment Report incorporating performance standards and design

guidelines should be prepared to replace the amendment made by the Minister in 1996. The Minister

agreed.

The preparation of the Ministerial PAR continued until 2005 when Council was advised that the Ministerial

PAR had been revoked because it was no longer of state significance and Council would have primary

carriage of the PAR preparation.

Council prepared the required Statement of Intent and submitted it to the Minister in October 2006 and

received Ministerial agreement in March 2007. This was reinitiated on the 24th October 2014. This DPA is

the culmination of these matters.

There have been legislative changes since March 2007 that have changed the name of the process from

Plan Amendment Report to Development Plan Amendment.


City of Salisbury

Analysis

f) 13

The Mawson Lakes Concept

The Mawson Lakes concept is focused on the principal areas of business development, environmental

management and urban development. The urban development is intended to demonstrate the aims of

linking the natural environment, business and industry with a high quality living environment and will

employ innovative and best practice principles in urban design, social development and environmental

management.

Mawson Lakes provide models, through research, innovation and the application of technology, in the

conservation and management of resources, the natural environment, urban planning and the provision of

social and physical infrastructure.

The Business Plan for Mawson Lakes development indicated it was intended to be characterised by the

following features:

Mixed Use Urban Form

Low impact industrial and commercial development interspersed with residential development, resulting in reduced levels of physical separation of job locations and employees’ houses, and accordingly reduced need for motor vehicle use.

Employment/business development to be focused on the three key fields of IT & T, education and environmental technologies.

Community, recreational, educational and retail facilities to be within close proximity to houses to ensure easy access without the need for private vehicle usage.

In the order of 20% of the developable area to be utilised for business/industry activities.

Environmentally Sustainable Development

Infrastructure innovation in the area of water/waste management and wetland development.

Environmentally sensitive design and construction technologies to improve energy management and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Transport and road systems designed to minimise use of private vehicles, give priority to walking, cycling and promote the use of public transport.

Higher Residential Densities

To reduce environmental and infrastructure stress on Metropolitan fringe areas.

To contribute to the vibrant character of the development and achieve a climate of activity and innovation.

To provide a wide range of housing choices.

To enable people to be able to live, work, learn and play in the same neighbourhood.

To reduce energy use by maximising the viability of public transport, and the number of people in close proximity to a range of services and facilities.


City of Salisbury

Analysis

e) 14

IT & T Enhanced Urban Form

IT & T capabilities to be world class.

Wireless and optic fibre connections to all households and public places.

Electronic delivery of services.

Facilities to enable teleworking and development of telecottages.

Social and Cultural Enhancement

Use of innovative consultation and participation methods to ensure involvement of all stakeholders.

Use of IT & T to provide community information services.

A range of cultural and leisure opportunities including some relating to the IT & T focus.

Provision of a range of housing types, sizes and tenures to attract a broad range of residents.

Strong promotion of cultural diversity and vibrancy.

The key features of the development was the integration of land uses to create a model higher density

urban development with reduced environmental impacts.

2. The strategic context and policy directions

2.1 Consistency with South Australia’s Strategic Plan

South Australia’s Strategic Plan outlines a medium to long-term vision for the whole of South Australia. It

has two important, complementary roles. Firstly, it provides a framework for the activities of the South

Australian Government, business and the entire South Australian community. Secondly, it is a means for

tracking progress state-wide, with the targets acting as points of reference that can be assessed

periodically.

The DPA supports the following targets of South Australia’s Strategic Plan:

South Australia’s Strategic Plan 2011

Strategic Plan Objective/Targets Comment/Response

Target 1: Urban spaces

Increase the use of public spaces by the community

Mawson Lakes contains significant open spaces that provide a range of functions, including passive and active recreation

Target 7: Affordable housing

South Australia leads the nation over the period to 2020 in the

proportion of homes sold or built that are affordable by low and

moderate income households

Development at Mawson Lakes seeks to provide a range of dwelling types to suit the needs and preferences of a range of different demographics. Council’s Development Plan contains a provision seeking for 15 percent affordable housing in significant


City of Salisbury

Analysis

f) 15

South Australia’s Strategic Plan 2011

developments.

Target 47: Jobs

Increase employment by 2% each year from 2010 to 2016

Mawson Lakes has been planned as a true mixed use suburb, providing a range of employment generating activities. Of particular note, Technology Park is a state of the art employment precinct featuring a range of high-tech employers

Target 63: Use of public transport

Increase the use of public transport to 10% of metropolitan weekday

passenger vehicle kilometres travelled by 2018

The designation of Mawson Lakes as a transit oriented site is due to its existing provision of public transport options (rail and bus). Council’s Development Plan contains provisions seeking to ensure development supports this outcome.

Target 68: Urban development

By 2036, 70% of all new housing in metropolitan Adelaide will be being

built in established areas

The higher residential density sought within Mawson Lakes seeks to ensure delivery of a range of housing choices within the established metropolitan area

Target 73: Recycled stormwater

South Australia has the system capacity to harvest up to 35 GL of

stormwater per annum by 2025

Target 74: Recycled wastewater

South Australia has the system capacity to recycle up to 50 GL of

wastewater per annum by 2025

Dwellings within Mawson Lakes are connected to Council’s Purple Pipe recycled water scheme. Significant wetlands within Mawson Lakes perform a function required for stormwater recycling.

Target 90: Share of overseas students

Increase the number of overseas students across all education and

training sectors from 13 737 in 2003 to 45 000 by 2014

Development at Mawson Lakes seeks to facilitate a range of different demographics, and the DPA will see policy introduced which supports development of student accommodation options.

2.2 Consistency with the Planning Strategy

The Planning Strategy presents current State Government planning policy for development in South

Australia. In particular, it seeks to guide and coordinate State Government activity in the construction and

provision of services and infrastructure that influence the development of South Australia. It also indicates

directions for future development to the community, the private sector and local government.

The following volumes of the Planning Strategy are relevant to this DPA:

▪ 30 Year Plan for Greater Adelaide

The DPA supports the following targets of the Planning Strategy:

Target How the target will be implemented:

By 2040, 70 percent of all new housing in metropolitan

Adelaide will be being built in established areas

Mawson Lakes is recognised as a TOD site and the proposed policy will

seek to provide for increased residential density and building heights


City of Salisbury

Analysis

e) 16

Target How the target will be implemented:

About 60 percent of metropolitan Adelaide’s new

housing growth will be located within 800 metres of

current or extended transit corridors.

A significant portion of Mawson Lakes is located within 800 metres of the

Gawler rail line which is identified as a major transit corridor. The

proposed policy will seek to ensure opportunities for increased density

within the urban core zone. The majority of the residential area within

Mawson Lakes is substantially complete, and it is not anticipated that

these areas would be redeveloped for some time.

Plan for about 60,000 dwellings in 14 transit oriented

developments.

Mawson Lakes is designated as a TOD site and the DPA will recognise this

through the introduction of an Urban Core zone which would support

higher residential density.

Provide for at least 15 percent of housing in all new

significant developments to be affordable housing,

including five percent for high-needs people.

Affordable housing policies will be included for the residential areas in

the DPA.

Closely connect new dwellings to shops, schools, local

health services and a variety of destinations within 400

metres. Residents will have easy access to open spaces

for physical activity and recreation.

The DPA will support the achievement of these aims by providing for a

range of activities to be accommodated within the Urban Core Zone.

Distribute jobs across Greater Adelaide as:

- 94,000 in TODs and transit corridors

- 15,000 in key regeneration areas and in activity centres that are outside corridors

The DPA will seek to ensure provision of a range of employment

generating activities throughout Mawson Lakes, and in particular within

the Urban Core Zone and Mawson Innovation Precinct.

Reduce car dependency and increase public transport to

10 percent of all transport use by 2018.

The DPA will facilitate the ongoing provision of higher density residential

development and employment generating activities in proximity to the

existing public transport interchange.

Incorporate greenways in all transit-oriented

developments and along major transit corridors.

The Dry Creek Linear Park extends through the majority of the Mawson

Lakes area and provides a central spine that links various activities

through the provision of walking and cycling paths. The DPA will not

hinder the establishment of a greenway along the rail corridor, which is

supported by the existing general provisions of within Council’s

Development Plan.

Reduce demand on mains water supply from new

development through the introduction of water-

sensitive urban design.

In addition to existing general provisions within the Development Plan,

development within Mawson Lakes is required to be connected to the

Recycled Water Scheme for use in watering of landscaping and gardens

and toilet flushing.

The DPA will support the 30 Year Plan for Greater Adelaide by implementing the following policies:


City of Salisbury

Analysis

f) 17

Policy How the policy will be implemented:

Concentrate new growth within metropolitan Adelaide

in transit corridors, transit-oriented developments and

activity centres so that the urban character of the

majority of neighbourhoods remains largely unchanged.

The DPA will not hinder the attainment of this policy. The proposed

policies will recognise the identification of Mawson Lakes as a TOD site

and provide for increased density and building heights. The majority of

the residential area at Mawson Lakes will remain largely unchanged.

Ensure that the bulk of new residential development in

Greater Adelaide is low to medium-rise development

(including detached dwellings) and confine high rise

developments to the 14 identified TODs.

The proposed Urban Core Zone policies provide for medium to high rise

developments. The surrounding residential zone will recognise the

existing low to medium density development.

Concentrate higher densities and medium-rise

development around mixed-use activity centres and

railway, tram and bus stations.

DPA policies will support this provision.

Require high quality open space in all TODs Over 30 percent of the Mawson Lakes area is provided for open space.

The DPA will promote the requirement to continue to provide high

quality open space.

Provide safe and attractive streetscapes in growth areas

and TODs through street planting and lighting

Mawson Lakes has been recognised as a World Health Organisation

Certified Safe Community. The DPA will promote high quality urban

design outcomes that continue to support this policy.

Require new mixed-use medium and high-rise

developments to provide active street frontages (such

as shops, services and restaurants) to encourage

connectivity and increase public safety.

The proposed desired character statements and specific policies in the

Urban Core Zone will seek to ensure this outcome.

Maximise the location of economic and social

infrastructure by:

- Co-locating government services in higher-order activity centres and TODs

- Locating new housing growth in proximity

- Integrating health and educational facilities with transport services and locating them near retail centres

The DPA will support the achievement of this policy by providing for a

range of activities to be accommodated in the Urban Core Zone.

The DPA introduces Policy Library modules, which have been developed with reference to and have strong

links to the Planning Strategy.

2.3 Consistency with other key strategic policy documents

This DPA accords with other key policy documents in the following manner:


City of Salisbury

Analysis

e) 18

Council’s City Plan recognises Mawson Lakes as a Transit Oriented Development site, District Centre and Activity Centre, as well as a key employment precinct.

2.3.1 Council’s Strategic Directions Report

This DPA is consistent with Council’s Strategic Directions Report (as agreed by the Minister in October

2013). The Strategic Directions Report recognised the Mawson Lakes DPA as an existing DPA within

Council’s work program, and identifies the area as a Transit Oriented Development site and key activity

centre.

2.3.2 Infrastructure planning

The proposed amendment will be consistent with current infrastructure planning (both social and physical)

identified in council’s strategic directions report, by the Minister or by a relevant government agency.

The following infrastructure planning is of relevance to this DPA:

Council Infrastructure Planning Response/Comment

Road DPA reflects Master Plan outcomes and Council requirements

Water DPA reflects Master Plan outcomes and Council requirements

Human Services DPA reflects Master Plan, Project Commitment Deed and Council requirements

Strategic Infrastructure Plan 2015

Road Improve the State’s competitiveness through efficient freight transport networks and improved international links.

Minimise the impact of freight vehicle movement on the community and

environment by appropriately locating and protecting freight routes

Rail Encourage the shift to rail transport for passenger and freight movements where justified by environmental, economic or social imperatives.

Air Ensure any change in land use on or adjacent to export airports does not preclude future transport development.

People movement Coordinate public transport networks and facilities to maximise access to social services.

Transform Adelaide’s urban passenger transport system into a cost


City of Salisbury

Analysis

f) 19


effective, environmentally friendly and modern metropolitan network.

Land

Industrial Identify, protect and facilitate the development of a 15 to 20 year supply of suitable industrial land to meet demand.

Ensure infrastructure is provided in an integrated and timely manner to support existing and proposed industrial development

Planning of industrial estates should encourage sustainable industrial practices

Residential Ensure that planning for residential developments is more closely integrated with infrastructure and transport planning

Information and Communications Technology

Broadband Implement South Australia’s Broadband Strategy to support development and use of broadband services.

Coordinate deployment and use of ICT infrastructure, including broadband, with the state’s physical infrastructure priorities, including transport, new housing and industrial developments and other built infrastructure.

Education and Training

Education assets Adopt a coordinated approach to future education asset provision, using innovative approaches to provide multi-purpose facilities that incorporate more than just educational uses.

Integrate planning for provision of education with provision of related or complementary public services.

Service Technology and Innovation

State STI Infrastructure Establish the innovation, education and training precincts to/from the Adelaide Innovation Constellation

Recreation and Sport

Asset management Refocus the design, provision and distribution of appropriate recreation and sporting facilities throughout the State to improve access to and use of them at the community level.


City of Salisbury

Analysis

e) 20


Community Services and Housing

Integration of services Improve community access and amenity by better linking housing to transport and infrastructure

Energy

Managing peak demand Promote the adoption of demand-side measures that contribute to more efficient energy use and improved use of existing infrastructure.

As the DPA will formalise in effect the end result of a development that has been master planned over

some time, with involvement from all relevant agencies to provide the necessary infrastructure, it is

considered that there is compliance with the matters listed in the above table.

2.3.3 Current Ministerial and Council DPAs

This DPA has taken into account the following Ministerial and Council DPAs which are currently being

processed:

Council DPAs Response/Comment

Salisbury Heights Residential DPA Not expected to impact upon this DPA

Globe Derby Surplus Lands DPA Not expected to impact upon this DPA

Rural Aircraft Noise Direk Industry and Residential Interface DPA Not expected to impact upon this DPA

Mixed Use (Bulky Goods, Entertainment and Leisure) Zone DPA Not expected to impact upon this DPA

Salisbury City Centre DPA Not expected to impact upon this PDA, although similar outcomes are sought with regard to identifying and zoning the City Centre to reflect its status as a TOD and key activity centre

Walpole Road, Paralowie DPA Not expected to impact upon this DPA

Waterloo Corner Road Burton DPA Not expected to impact upon this DPA


City of Salisbury

Analysis

f) 21

Ministerial DPAs Response/Comment

Greater Edinburgh Parks Employment Lands Part 2 DPA Not expected to impact upon this DPA

2.3.4 Existing Ministerial Policy

The DPA proposes to delete the MFP (The Levels) Zone which was introduced through a Ministerial DPA.

The zoning is now outdated and requires amendment to provide greater policy detail to guide future

development of the area.

This DPA does not propose to make changes to any other existing Ministerial policy, which is contained

within the core policy of the State Planning Policy Library.


City of Salisbury

Analysis

e) 22

3. Investigations

3.1 Investigations undertaken prior to the SOI

Investigations previously undertaken that have informed this DPA include the following:

MFP Development Act 1991

MFP Adelaide Supplementary Development Plan by the Minister 1993 which has a reference

list of 21 main investigations, including the overarching report “MFP Adelaide Design Concept

Development and Core Site Assessment” Kinhill / Delfin Joint Venture 1991

Assessment of Aircraft Noise Exposure and Housing Construction Requirements at Proposed

Residential Development, Parafield Gardens. Bassett Acoustics December 1995.

Development Plan (City of Salisbury-MFP (The Levels) ) Amendment Act 1996

City of Salisbury MFP (The Levels) Amendment PAR by the Minister 1996 which had 9 main

investigations

Project Commitment Deed – Mawson Lakes Economic Development Project

City of Salisbury Mawson Lakes Development Zone Plan Amendment Report Consultation

Draft by the Minister 2005 (cancelled due to no longer being considered of state significance) which included:

o A number of studies and workshops into the design approach

o Archaeological site survey, Vivienne Wood 1995

o Vegetation Survey, Delta Environmental Consulting 2001

o Acoustic Noise study, Bassett Consulting Engineers 1995

o Series of reports and PAR investigations on the Town Centre retailing (Hassell Retail Report 1998)

o Preliminary Environmental Site Assessments Mary / Dan Street area 2003

Technology Park Design Guidelines May 2002

Technology Park Master Plan 2003

University of South Australia Mawson Lakes Campus Master Plan 2002-2010 August 2003

The Delfin Lend Lease Consortium also undertook a number of studies since its appointment in October 1994 including:

o “Towards a Business Plan for the Development of ‘The Levels’ Site – Agenda for Action”(December 1994). This was the result of a review of all planning and design


City of Salisbury

Analysis

f) 23

documentation and background studies undertaken by or on behalf of the MFP. The report contains an overall ‘Vision Statement’, key objectives and identified issues for investigation.

o A design workshop was held in February 1995 with a range of stakeholder groups and professionals with particular design expertise.

o An ‘International Urban Design Workshop’ was held in April 1995. Attendees included designers from Australia, the USA, the UK and Japan.

o In May 1995 the First Draft Business Plan was produced which included a Structure Plan incorporating the key design elements derived from the international workshop.

o In July 1995 the final Business Plan was produced which included an Overview, the Development Proposal, Planning, Environmental and Technical Aspects, Community Services and Facilities, Residential Market Background, Business and Employment Background, Economic and Financial Analysis, Information Technology and Telecommunications, and Commitments.

o In July 1996 a joint Consortium / MFP Development Corporation Business Plan was completed. Cabinet adopted this Plan in October 1996.

o On 10 July 1997 Joint Venture Agreements were signed.

o An Urban Design Workshop was held on 14 and 15 August 1997 to focus on key design principles and concepts, particularly for the first ‘Village.’

Technology Park Design Guidelines May 2002.

Mawson Lakes Campus, University SA, Master Plan 2002-2010 August 2003.

Technology Park Master Plan update December 2006.

Mawson Lakes Master Plan review February 2007.

The following report was initiated by a Joint Venture partner separately to the DPA process, and is reflected in the Mawson Lakes DPA policy preparation where applicable and relevant.

Technology Park Master Plan August 2007

3.2 Investigations undertaken to inform this DPA

In accordance with the Statement of Intent for this DPA the following investigations have been undertaken to inform this DPA:

Heritage (Indigenous and European)

Native vegetation

Interface issues with adjoining Parafield Airport, including consideration of implications of aircraft noise, public safety areas and building heights

Town Centre Retailing and retail analysis of future development at Mawson Lakes and potential impact on other centres, particularly Salisbury Town Centre and Hollywood Plaza

Potential site contamination


City of Salisbury

Analysis

e) 24

Investigation of potential future land use/zoning options for the Mary/Dan Street precinct

Consideration of Metropolitan Open Space System and Open Space provision

Consideration of desired residential density

Implications of Mawson Connector, Transport linkages and role of the existing Interchange

Interface issues with adjoining industrial uses and railway line

3.2.1 Industry

The Master Plan design and approval process has resulted in landscape buffers, acoustic mounding and fencing to the adjoining industry areas, rail corridor and a part of Technology Park.

Encumbrances have been established on properties adjacent the existing industry activities of the Mary / Dan Street precinct, and the residential properties on Park Way backing onto the Sarstedt Australia property. Requirements for fencing and mounding and their retention are in the encumbrances to protect the activities along the interface in accordance with acoustic studies recommendations.

The rail corridor accommodates the Adelaide-Gawler passenger rail line and the interstate freight line as well as some marshalling activities. The corridor has acoustic mounding and fencing within the adjoining buffer reserves as per acoustic studies. The BDP and General DPA changed the zoning of this area to Industry and as an Infrastructure Policy Area. Further discussion is in section 3.2.5.1.

The Sharp Court area forms a logical extension to the industrial area to the west. A buffer has been established for new industrial developments along Sharp Court. Industrial traffic is separated from the residential area by road treatment at Levels Road connection with Beechwood Avenue.

Hudson Road is adjacent the existing industrial area at Greenfields. A number of commercial activities are located in the area which provides a buffer from the industrial estate. This area is proposed to become a Commercial Zone.

The existing activities on Main North Road near the corner of Montague Road are of a commercial nature, and include the Caltex Petrol Filling Station site. This area is adjacent Technology Park. This area is proposed to become a Commercial Zone.

The Mary and Dan Street area of the Mawson Lakes Development was established prior to the commencement of Mawson Lakes. It has within it a number of existing operations of an industrial and commercial nature. Some existing dwellings are within the area. It is proposed that this area will become part of the Residential Zone. It is recognised that there will be a transition towards that zone objective. Further discussion on this is in sections 3.2.5.1 and 3.2.8.

The policies of the proposed Industry Zone and Commercial Zone and the general interface relationship policies will provide ongoing control to minimise the potential for adverse impacts on adjoining activities.

Parafield Airport has identified an area of its airport at its western corner adjacent the rail line and the Bridges as being an Industrial estate. This is outside of the Council Development Plan, and subject to the Airport Master Plan and legislation controls. The Master Plan has recognised the residential area adjacent the proposed estate, and has put in the Master Plan a buffer area and land uses that will minimise the impacts. Further discussion is in section 3.2.2.4.5.


City of Salisbury

Analysis

f) 25

Policy Outcomes: Sharp Court area to be zoned as Industry.

The Hudson Road and the Main North Road corner Montague Road areas to be

zoned Commercial.

Interface policies in the Industry and Commercial Zones and the council wide

provisions will provide ongoing control and land use change control to minimise

adverse impacts on adjoining activities.

3.2.2 Transport Corridors

The Interchange building is substantially located within the rail corridor and is proposed to be included in the proposed Industry Zone - Infrastructure Policy Area.

The proposed zoning is intended to accommodate this type of activity and will have no impact on the interchange. The access ways and car park area for the Interchange will be within the proposed Urban Core Zone which will accommodate this type of activity and allow development consideration of further like development should it be required.

Existing land division design and development authorisations have had regard to properties along Main North Road, Salisbury Highway, and Elder Smith Road. Landscape buffers are provided in places to minimise access onto the roads. The Commissioner of Highways approval is required to obtain direct access along the arterial roads. The rail corridor has acoustic mounding and fencing to minimise noise impacts, and reserves to stop direct access through residential properties.

Policy Outcome: Rail corridor to be contained within the Industry Zone, Infrastructure Policy Area

3.3.3 Linkages with Technology Park and the University of South Australia

Planning policy can deal with the land use relationships, but cannot deal with the relationship matters outside of land use. The policy is designed to not hinder the Mawson Innovation Precinct which covers the University of South Australia’s Mawson Lakes campus and recognises the collaborative links with the nearby Technology Park Adelaide. A key direction in Council’s strategy is to “Establish the Mawson Innovation Precinct (MIP) which will bring together the innovation, technology knowledge and research and development resources of Technology Park, University of South Australia and Mawson Lakes to form one of Australia’s leading integrated innovation precincts.”

The Desired Character statement for the Urban Core Zone, which covers the University of South Australia and Technology Park, will reflect the nature of the research collaboration and opportunities to create physical linkages when appropriate.

There has been some housing established in Technology Park, including Small Office Home Office designs.

A policy area is proposed for the University of South Australia campus and the Technology Park to identify its nature.


City of Salisbury

Analysis

e) 26

Policy Outcome: Planning policy land use controls, a Policy Area and Desired Character Statement

for the Mawson Lakes Urban Core Zone will enhance, where possible, the Mawson

Lakes Innovation Precinct.

3.3.4 Parafield Airport

Building Heights

Controls relating to building heights around the airports are already controlled in the Development Plan. The diagram 3.2.2.4.1 below is adapted from Salisbury City Airport Building Heights Map Sal/1(Overlay 2) in the Development Plan.

Development in the City of Salisbury is required to obtain the approval of Parafield Airport Ltd when it:

Is within the area marked All structures

Exceeds 15m above ground level in the area coloured yellow in the diagram.

Exceeds 45m above ground level in the area coloured brown in the diagram.

The DPA will continue to reflect these height restrictions. The development constraints mapping introduced in the BDP and General DPA has improved the clarity of the previous building heights map.

Policy Outcome: Current controls will continue and will not be altered by policies in this DPA.

Improved mapping was introduced through the BDP and General DPA.


City of Salisbury

Analysis

f) 27

Diagram 3.2.2.4.1 Building Heights controls


City of Salisbury

Analysis

e) 28

Initiatives from National Aviation Policy - Flight Path to the Future

In December 2009 the Minister for Infrastructure and Transport released the Australian Government’s National Aviation Policy, Flight Path to the Future. The policy proposes a range of initiatives including land use planning around airports. It identified the need to introduce a national land use planning regime to minimise sensitive development near airports and under flight paths.

The National Airports Safeguarding Advisory Group was set up 2010 to implement the National Policy initiatives relating to safeguarding airports and surrounding communities from inappropriate developments. NASAG has recently released a set of guidelines for consultation relating to managing risk associated with wildlife strikes, intrusions into airspace, wind turbines, and lighting distractions. Additional guidelines are expected to be released in the future.

Many of these matters are already covered by current legislation spread across the Civil Aviation Act and Regulations, Civil Aviation Safety Authority Manual of Standards, Airports Act and Regulations, Defence (Area Control) Regulations, CASA Safety Regulations, Airports (Protection of Airspace) Regulations, and Development Plans. The Guidelines seek to simplify and centralise the awareness of the various sources of legislation.

Some new aspects are proposed to be introduced through the Guidelines. One is “Risk of Building Generated Windshear and Turbulence at Airports”, and the other “Measures for Managing Impacts of Aircraft Noise” which identifies different metrics to the current ANEF system. At the time of this version of the DPA, the Guidelines have not been approved by Government. These Guidelines may result in changes to land use policy at a later time.

The BDP and General DPA introduced a Building Near Airfields module which reflects the State’s current position on land use policy for development near airports. It has regard to aspects such as lighting glare, smoke and exhaust emissions, air turbulence, bird attraction, electronic interference which are identified in the NASAG Guidelines. It is expected that changes to the Building Near Airfields module policies arising from the NASAG guidelines will be incorporated through policy changes by the Minister.

Policy outcome: The BDP and General DPA introduced a Building Near Airfields module that covers

some of the proposed NASAG Guidelines. Planning policy may need to be updated

at a later time to reflect further NASAG Guidelines.

Public Safety Areas

The Federal Government National Aviation Policy contains a direction to investigate Public Safety Areas at airports. The ‘Safeguards for Airports and the Communities around them’ Discussion Paper released by the Government in 2009 further progresses the proposal.

Council has incorporated a Public Safety Area adjacent the Edinburgh Defence Airfield into the Industry Zone, and anticipates further incorporation into other zones as the opportunity arises.

In the absence of a definitive standard to date by the Government, Council has used the standards contained in the Queensland State Planning Policy 1/02 Guideline: Development in the Vicinity of Certain Airports and Aviation Facilities, Department of Local Government and Planning, Queensland Government, 2002. Elements of this have been modified through the State Government’s Planning Policy Library module for Building Near Airports.


City of Salisbury

Analysis

f) 29

The Queensland model restricts developments that are hazardous or involve a high concentration of employees or public. The restricted area extends 1000m from the end of the runway, is 350m wide at the runway, and 250m wide at the end point.

The following diagram shows the protected area from the current runway end and also from the anticipated extended runway end as identified in the Parafield Airport Master Plan. The area overlays the University of South Australia sports fields. Policy will indicate that this area will remain free from development that has high risk associated with it.

Diagram 3.2.2.4.3 Runway Public Safety areas for Runway 03L/21R

Airplane noise is discussed in a separate section- refer to Section 3.2.5.2.

Policy outcome: Mawson Lakes DPA policy will recognise the proposed extension of the airport

runway 03L/21R as identified in the Airport 2012 Master Plan and create a Public

Safety Area based on the Queensland Model at the southern end (to be contained in

the Public Safety Area Policy Area).


City of Salisbury

Analysis

e) 30

Building Generated Windshear and Turbulence at Airports

One of the new aspects proposed to be introduced through the Guidelines is “Risk of Building Generated Windshear and Turbulence at Airports”.

The Guidelines identify that obstacles such as buildings that are located in the path of crosswinds to an operational runway has a potential impact on plane movements at take-off and landing. The crosswinds are diverted around and over the building causing the crosswind speed to vary along the runway. The Guidelines identify a 2.4km x 1.4km protected area is at the end of runways. Buildings within the protected area will need assessment against a set of criteria to determine the impacts of the building design on wind flows. Consultants will be required if the criteria is not met, or in some cases to determine the technical nature of the criteria.

This Guideline is still being assessed by the Federal Government. It may be introduced at which time it will be incorporated into planning policy. The following diagram shows the potential affected area of the existing runway and extended runway limits.

Diagram 3.2.2.4.4 Windshear Guideline affected area of runway 03L/21R

Policy Outcome: No incorporation into DPA. Council to await Federal and State final policies.

Parafield Airport Master Plan – Cross Keys Precinct

Parafield Airport released its most recent Masterplan in November 2012. The Masterplan continues to identify the airport’s western corner adjacent the rail line and the Bridges as being a future Industrial estate.


City of Salisbury

Analysis

f) 31

It has recognised the residential uses of Mawson Lakes and has it has identified the need for a landscaped buffer and promotes industrial activities such as warehousing and light industry which will further act as a buffer. The airport development is not controlled by Council’s Development Plan. The Airport Master Plan has attempted to align as far as possible the Master Plan with the Development Plan system.

The road connection into St Kitts Place in the Bridges is accepted by Council as only for emergency passenger vehicle access.

Diagram 3.2.2.4.5 Airport Cross Keys Precinct

Policy Outcome: Policies in the general Interface Between Land Use section of Council’s Development

Plan will address the potential impacts of industrial development in the Parafield

Airport.


City of Salisbury

Analysis

e) 32

3.3.5 Heritage

Background to Indigenous Culture

The northern Adelaide Plains was part of the territorial lands of the Kaurna nation. The Tandanya clan occupied the Adelaide area and on to Gawler, and within the Tandanya was a local group Wirra which was thought to be the main inhabitants of the Levels area. (Harvey 1990 cited in Wood Aug 2006). The Dry Creek outwash plain may have been a major residential area for the Kaurna people prior to European settlement. A significant number and range of artefacts, earthen mounds, and campsites were mostly located around the eastern periphery of the plain in an arc fringing the low-lying area. (Wood Aug 2006). A number of studies recorded items in the region for surveys for the South Road/Salisbury Highway connector, the wetlands and ICI Penrice pond. The majority have been either collected prior to destruction or destroyed during construction of these projects. (Wood Aug 2006) A total of 16 stone artefact scatters and six isolated artefacts were recorded for the Mawson Lakes development. Kaurna community representatives collected most of the artefacts. (Wood 1995 cited in Wood Aug 2006). Another two stone artefact scatters and six isolated artefacts were recorded for the Bennet Road extension. (Wood 1999a cited in Wood Aug 2006). MFP Australia received authorisation under the Aboriginal Heritage Act 1988 (SA) from the Minister for Aboriginal Affairs to damage, disturb or interfere with any Aboriginal site, object or remains during development of Mawson Lakes, subject to:

Buffer zones being established around 16 mounds and being protected and landscaped as determined by the Department of State Aboriginal Affairs in consultation with the Kaurna Aboriginal Community Heritage Association

Archaeological salvage operations undertaken on 13 other sites. The Joint Venture agreed in October 2000 to preserve an additional mound site, and that all the sites are entered into the register of Aboriginal sites and objects under the Aboriginal Heritage Act. A cultural heritage study of the built area of the University of South Australia Mawson Lakes campus found heightened potential for the existence of cultural material to exist in an identified area. Recommendations to the University were to test in any proposed construction area in consultation with Kaurna representatives. (Wood Aug 2006) In summary, studies have indicated that the Kaurna were effectively excluded from any productive, ritual, or religious use of the area within three decades of white settlement, but the descendents historical knowledge, testimony, and archaeological evidence leads to their belief of the Mawson Lakes area retaining a significant level of cultural importance, despite the extensive modification to the landscape. (Lucas 1991 cited in Wood Aug 2006). Within this context, development or redevelopment of sites that may have indigenous heritage items, or involve new discoveries, may be likely. Existing legislation provisions will apply to the protection of indigenous heritage. There has been extensive development of Mawson Lakes within the current process of Aboriginal heritage identification and protection under the Aboriginal Heritage Act 1988. A number of sites have been retained in the development and a number of artefacts recorded and relocated.


City of Salisbury

Analysis

f) 33

Background to European Culture

Squatters pasturing stock used the region until it was surveyed in 1842. The area was known as ‘Dry Creek’, or ‘Para Plains’. A settlement known as ‘Rathmines’ existed in the area now used as the golf course of the University of South Australia. (Harris 2003 cited in Wood Aug 2006) The earliest land grants in the area were to Sir Montague Chapman, Daniel Brady and CH Bagot. In 1848 Charles Fisher who had leased much of Bagot’s land began purchasing land. His interest was to hold sheep for the Adelaide markets from his stations in Queensland, northern South Australia, the Northern Territory, and Victoria. The property became one of the state’s leading merino studs. (Delta Environmental Consulting Feb 2002) The Adelaide to Gawler rail line was built in 1856 through Fisher’s land. The property passed to Fisher’s manager, E.W Pitts, in 1876 who was instrumental in extending the fame of the ‘The Levels’. The area became known as ‘The Levels Estate’. The 3000 acre estate was sold to H W Morphett in 1889 and then sold to the pastoral company Elder Smith in 1909. The property was used to agist sheep and cattle in association with the nearby Gepps Cross abattoirs, built in 1913. Part of the area generally became known as ‘The Abattoirs’ when construction began on the Gepps Cross meatworks and markets complex. It became Pooraka in 1916, named after an Aboriginal word for dry waterhole, or dry creek. A 1921 subdivision named Paraville was changed to Pooraka in 1928, and the suburb name Pooraka applied to a 1952 subdivision. (Maurovic 2007) Part of the The Levels estate area was compulsorily acquired in the 1920s by the Commonwealth to build Parafield Airport, which was later extended over further acquired land in 1942. The airport was first used in 1927. Some of the roads are named after prominent pastoralists, such as Goldsborough Road (misspelled from Richard Goldsbrough), Frederick Street in Cavan, (thought to be named after Frederic Dalgety), CB Fisher Drive, and EW Pitts Avenue. (Maurovic 2007) The University of South Australia Mawson Lakes campus was built in 1971, commencing as the South Australian Institute of Technology Levels campus. The State Government established Technology Park in 1982. The former Levels Homestead and associated Stables, located at 15 Park Way and Lot 951 The Mews, Mawson Lakes were placed on the SA Heritage Register on 1 September 1983. The Homestead and Stables were built in 1876 as the residential base of the pastoral property and activities, particularly its premier Merino sheep breeding enterprises. It was owned by CB Fisher before being sold with the land to EW Pitts. The Levels was also noted for horse breeding activities which were of importance to the racing and trotting industries in SA.

Architecturally, the Levels Homestead is an excellent example of a mid Victorian homestead

complex. The Main house is beautifully designed and built and the stable blocks are very good

examples of their building types. (Excerpt Statement of Significance SA Heritage Register)

The natural alignment of Dry Creek was changed to allow creation of the Sir Douglas Mawson Lake. The new alignment split the Homestead from the Stables.


City of Salisbury

Analysis

e) 34

Two dwellings in the Mary Dan Street area described in Salisbury Heritage Survey are at 2 Mary Street, and 360 – 364 Mawson Lakes Boulevard. Both previously had addresses on Levels Road. The dwellings significance was linked to their identification with the residential development of the original small division that was part of the Montague Estate. (Salisbury Heritage Survey 1991). Neither were recommended for State or Local heritage listing. It was discovered that there was a cemetery in Mary Street, but the location has not been positively identified. It has been recorded that there are 5 graves (although sunken) and at least one member of the family was of the Quinlivan family. As a result of investigations a plaque has been erected on the land retained by the City of Salisbury to commemorate the burial site and to the best of Council’s knowledge to identify the names of those buried in the locality.

Policy outcome: The existing heritage provisions in Council’s Development Plan will ensure heritage issues

are addressed.

3.3.6 Native Vegetation

The original vegetation in the area were a mix of grasslands of Stipa and Danthonia spp., occupying most of the area, and Eucalyptus woodlands dominated by E. camaldulensis (red gum) and E. leucoxylon (blue gum) along the Dry Creek course. Samphire marshlands and low shrubland occupied the coastal fringe. (Kraehenbuehl 1996 cited in V. Wood Aug 2006) Past grazing activities and soil conditions have cleared the area of significant vegetation. The most established vegetation at the time of the start of the development occurred within Technology Park along Dry Creek, as well as roadside vegetation along Park Way and Warrendi Road. There is also buffer planting on Main North Road. This consists of mature and semi mature eucalypts, casuarinas and a variety of native understorey planting. Extensive planting has also been undertaken in the Greenfields wetlands.(Minister’s PAR MFP (The Levels) 19th Dec 1996) The Mawson Lakes development area is not within the area covered by the Native Vegetation Act 1991 but it is within the area where “significant tree” legislation applies under the Development Act 1993.

Policy outcome: The existing native vegetation provisions in Council’s Development Plan will ensure issues

relating to native vegetation are addressed.

3.3.7 Noise

The Mawson Lakes area has the potential to be subject to noise from a number of sources, including traffic noise from arterial roads, passenger rail noise from the Adelaide-Gawler line, freight rail noise from the line and works in the Dry Creek marshalling yards, aircraft noise from Parafield Airport and noise from adjoining industrial areas.

Road, Rail and Industry Noise

Council supported studies by the MFP in 1995 which considered noise barriers to major arterial roads, the rail station and external industry generators. More detailed acoustic studies were further undertaken for each residential village proposal. Development has had regard to the findings of those studies for rail and road noise issues, with such design aspects as land division and road layouts, buffer allocations, noise mounds and the like. The Structure Plan for Mawson Lakes incorporated significant landscaped buffers or


City of Salisbury

Analysis

f) 35

open spaces being generally provided along the interfaces with the arterial road network surrounding and through the development area, assisting in the reduction of noise impacts from road traffic. Existing policies in the Industry Zone and in the relevant policy modules recognise interface issues between existing industry zone activities in adjacent zones, the rail corridor rail yards and the residential development. Existing mounding and acoustic fencing is within the reserve treatments adjacent the rail corridor. These will be retained in the relevant zone policies. However, new developments in the Rail Transport Policy Area of the Industry Zone will require additional treatments for development that impacts over and above the noise impacts treated by the existing mounding and fencing. The Mary and Dan Street area of the Mawson Lakes Development was established prior to the commencement of Mawson Lakes. It has within it a number of existing operations of an industrial and commercial nature. New housing has been constructed within the area at 1 Mary Street. Continuation use rights will apply to existing lawful activities, but the new direction of residential development will result in acoustic treatment and management requirements for both industry and residential uses within the area. Proposals will require compliance with EPA standards determined through the Environment Protection Act 1993 and the Environment Protection (Noise) Policy 2007.

Policy Outcome: The Rail transport area was identified in the BDP and General DPA as Industry Zone

- Infrastructure Policy Area. There will be requirements for acoustic treatment for

new developments that impact on the adjacent residential areas over and above the

existing acoustic fencing and mounding noise dampening.

Mary Dan Street area to be identified as Residential Zone with recognition of

existing non-residential activities and transition period to accommodate both

residential and non -residential uses and rights in accordance with EPA standards

and guidelines.

Parafield Airport

The MFP and stakeholders endorsed a report from acoustic consultants PGD Bassett Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd. assessing the draft Australian Noise Exposure Forecast relevant in 1995 and any construction techniques that might be necessary for proposed residential development. The agreed outcomes were that housing was to be established in areas deemed less than 25 Australian Noise Exposure Forecast (ANEF), and that no attenuation treatment was necessary for residential buildings when built in areas less than 25 ANEF. The ANEF unit is a measure of energy equivalence. It is a single equation of the noise levels produced by the various aircraft operating at an airport, plus a logarithmic function of the daily average number of aircraft noise events, with a weighting factor included if they occur during evening or night time hours when the sensitivity of people to noise is increased. The ANEF map is a series of contours showing the forecast of aircraft noise levels that is expected to exist in the future. The contour set may relate to a particular year, generally about 10 years from the date of issue, or it may be an "ultimate capacity" forecast. In the former case, it is based on a forecast of aircraft movement numbers, aircraft types, destinations, and a given set of runways at the airport for a particular year. In the latter case, it may incorporate several sets of such information relating to progressive stages in the development of an airport within a definite time horizon.


City of Salisbury

Analysis

e) 36

An ANEF requires review at regular intervals (about 5 years) to ensure its continuing validity. The contours are given as 20, 25, 30, 35 and 40 ANEF. They are read as being less noise intrusive at 20 ANEF with progressive noise intrusion levels as the ANEF increases.

It is Australian Government policy that ANEF contours and the associated land use compatibility advice be used as the land use planning criteria around Australian airports. This policy was announced in the Government's response to the House of Representatives Select Committee on Aircraft Noise recommendations in September 1990. The ANEF system is the basis of Australian Standard AS 2021-2000 and prior versions (Acoustics - aircraft noise intrusion - building siting and construction).

The Bassett report finding:

“Measured levels for aircraft flyover indicate that standard building construction is sufficient to achieve AS2021 internal noise level criteria. Assuming open windows, domestic use noise criterion is met in all cases, and is met for all but around 1.5% of aircraft movements for sleeping areas. Around 33% of the potential number of flights which may exceed this open window criterion take place after 7pm, hence the number of probable events exceeding the bedroom criterion, assuming open windows, is reduced to 0.5% of the airport activity. We hence conclude that residential development is suitable and be allowed without mandatory acoustical construction requirement.”

Parafield Airport has prepared a Master Plan for the airport identifies the airport flight activity and includes an updated Australian Noise Exposure Forecast for its next master plan period. As operations have changed at the airport since the Bassett Report, there are different impacts on the surrounding area. As it affects Mawson Lakes, there is a change in the ANEF contour from the current ANEF to the 2012 Airport Master Plan forecast for 2031. The changes are:

The 30 and 25 ANEF contours have contracted at the southern end of the runway over the University sports lands and part of Technology Park.

A slight expansion of the 25 ANEF contour over the north western part of the University

A rearrangement of the 20 ANEF contour that results in Mawson Central, Shoalhaven , the Bridges and the Cascades areas being included.

A new pocket of 25 ANEF at the north corner of the overpass and railway corridor.


City of Salisbury

Analysis

f) 37

2031 ANEF from Parafield Airport Master Plan

The 2012 Parafield Airport Master Plan 2031 ANEF is based on more accurate data of plane movements and better reflects the current situation then previous modelling. It also still results in the housing being located in the less than 25 ANEF contour which aligns with the original MFP requirement. However, as it is expected that aircraft movements will increase as forecast by the Master Plan with a potential change in the noise affected areas, it is prudent to adopt a policy that will consider airplane noise in housing design.

Policy direction: The Building Near Airfields module within Council’s Development Plan contains policies

that require development to meet the AS 2021 - Acoustics- Aircraft Noise Intrusion -

Building Siting and Construction.

It is noted that airplane noise can still be a nuisance to people who are in areas that are designated as less than 20 ANEF. The ANEF system does not readily explain the impacts of airplane noise. The Federal Government has recognised this and has released a NASAG Guide “Measures for Managing Impacts of Aircraft Noise” which identifies different metrics to the current ANEF system. At the time of this version of the DPA, the Guidelines have not been approved by Government.


City of Salisbury

Analysis

e) 38

3.3.8 Town Centre Retailing and Retailing Analysis

The original intended planning control for Mawson Lakes was to have a Neighbourhood Centre level of retail. However, the nature of the Mawson Lakes development with its range of uses including a University and Technology Park and resultant student and worker population, and the residential population base drove considerable debate over the size of future retail development in Mawson Lakes over a number of years. However, this debate has now been settled with the introduction of new strategic directions in The 30-Year Plan for Greater Adelaide by the State Government in February 2010. This Plan designates Mawson Lakes as a “District Activity Centre” which is defined as:

“Large centres that provide a range of retail, office, community, and entertainment facilities.

Shopping usually provides the most significant role, with associated civic, community, commercial

and recreational services…”

The Plan also identifies Mawson Lakes as a “Transit-oriented development” site – with such development comprising:

“Mixed-use, higher-density development centred on a major public transport access point. They

accommodate residential, high-order retail services and employment activities as well as high

quality open space...”

Additional to these two classifications is the designation for the University and Technology Park areas as a “Specialist Centre” which is defined as:

“Specialist Centres include major airports, ports, hospitals, universities, and research and business

centres that perform vital economic and employment roles.”

The Mawson Lakes Master Plan identified the area bounded by Main Street, Light Common, Garden Terrace and Mawson Lakes Boulevard as the main shopping area. It comprises two stages, with the first stage already developed with a supermarket and speciality shops of almost 5000sqm, offices of 1500sqm, and a further proposed 700sqm expansion. The second stage is intended to provide 5200sqm retail, 600sqm of office, and 40 residential units. A total retail floor area for the main shopping area is in the order 10,000sqm, with the total office floor area is in the order of 3,000sqm for the two stages. The area described as Mawson Central is identified as a mixed use area intended for specialist retail, restaurant, office, and community uses. Including current built, and approved but yet to be built, the floor areas are approximately 16,000sqm office and 6,000sqm retail. The capability of the combined retail area floor area is in the order of 16,000sqm, with office and commercial floor area in the order of 19,000sqm. In comparison, the other District Centres in Salisbury floor areas are:

Salisbury Town Centre 38,000sqm

Ingle Farm 17,000sqm

Hollywood Plaza 22,000sqm


City of Salisbury

Analysis

f) 39

The potential retail and commercial activity is in line with the classification of District Centre.

Policy Outcome: To ensure the retail focus of the main shopping area is reinforced it is intended that a

policy area be created bounded by Main Street, Light Common, Garden Terrace and

Mawson Lakes Boulevard. Secondary retail activity will be able to occur throughout the

remainder of the Mawson Central part of the Urban Core Zone.

3.3.9 Site Contamination

The 1996 Ministerial Plan Amendment Report “MFP (The Levels)” considered the issue of site contamination. The Investigations included anecdotal historical data from people with knowledge of the site history. This revealed that trenches were used for the disposal of sheep. An area of approximately 4.5 hectares containing trenches up to 1.2m deep was identified through aerial photography. There were no recollections of sheep or cattle dipping or extensive chemical spraying other than for Salvation Jane weed in the Technology Park area. Kinhill Engineers Pty Ltd (1995, cited in MFP (The Levels) PAR 1996) assessed the pits. Their locations were:

A 45,000sqm area in the centre of the site between Cross Keys Road and the Railway line

A 7,500sqm area in the area bounded by Montague Road, The Levels Road and Goldsborough Road (now Sharp Court).

Recommended remediation was by excavation and removal of pit contents and compaction with clean fill, or by excavation and reburial of pit contents to form buffer mounds along the railway line. Other site and contamination investigations over the Mawson Lakes area initiated by the Land Management Corporation (Soil and Groundwater Consulting 2002 and 2003) are:

Site History, MFP Stage 1, Residential Development, The Levels, South Australia, 18th June 1997 Golder Associates.

Mawson Lakes, Environmental Assessment, Stage 1 – Specific Site Sampling 6th March 1997 Golder Associates.

Mawson Lakes, Environmental Assessment, Stage 2 – Broad Scale Sampling 7th March 1997 Golder Associates.

The area east of Mary Street was the subject of the study “Environmental Site Assessment – Phase 1 Land East of Mary Street Mawson Lakes Sept 2002” (Soil and Groundwater Consulting) which found no potential contamination issues. The Mary Street, Levels Road and Dan Street area was the subject of the study “ Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment Dan Street and Mary Street Properties, Mawson Lakes 15th September 2003” (Resource and Environmental Management Pty Ltd) which found from an earlier study, some elevated concentrations of heavy metals within boreholes near main roads. It assumed this was related to vehicle emissions and runoff from roadways. No significant levels were found which would preclude development of the site. Two properties that had hydrocarbon impacted soils that may pose a moderate risk to human health and the environment. These are 10 Dan Street (CT 5171/616) and 5-7 Dan Street (CT 5940/872 and 871). Further investigations would be required to determine the extent of the contamination and the required remediation prior to redevelopment of this precinct.


City of Salisbury

Analysis

e) 40

In addressing the potential for site contamination, Council has regard to the Planning SA Advisory Notice 20 - Site Contamination, which sets out the responsibilities for Planning Authorities when addressing site contamination through the DPA process and when assessing development applications. There has been extensive development of Mawson Lakes undertaken within the current process of site contamination investigation, which meets the National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measures. Site audits and contamination reports have been required to be provided as part of the development assessment process. Since these studies were undertaken, industrial and commercial development has continued in the Mary / Dan Street area. It is considered reasonable to assume that contamination may have occurred since the studies. While a policy position for the DPA will be at the tail end of the development, it is considered necessary that future development sites still be assessed for contamination potential.

Policy Outcome: It is not considered necessary to undertake further investigations into potential

contamination at the DPA stage. The existing Development Plan policies within the

Hazards module relating to site contamination will apply and ensure the issue is

considered at the development assessment stage.

3.3.10 Mary/Dan Street Area

The Mary and Dan Street area of the Mawson Lakes Development was established prior to the commencement of Mawson Lakes. It has within it a number of existing operations of an industrial and commercial nature. The amenity level is low. The existing provisions in the current zoning, MFP (The Levels) restrict uses and the expansion of existing uses in this area to types that are compatible with other mixed uses including residential uses. The existing concept plan (Refer MFP(Lev)/1 Concept Plan in Development Plan) shows the area as being within the Technology Precinct of Technology Park. The area is not included in the Technology Park development guidelines. The Mary Dan Street area is separated from the main part of Technology Park by Dry Creek, and there are no linkages across. From 2002 onwards, the development options put forward have been for residential development over the Mary / Dan Street area. Land assembly and acquisition was being pursued but did not eventuate. The proposed residential direction was reflected in the Ministerial draft DPA. 20 two storey dwellings were approved in 2009 and are now constructed at 1 Mary Street. The existing non-residential activities within the Mary / Dan Street area have not enhanced Mawson Lakes during its development, and are inconsistent with the vision for Mawson Lakes as a high quality development. A land use Valuation Study of the Mary / Dan Street area concluded that there would be a higher value if zoned Residential rather than Industry. The standard of industrial improvements to the properties is below the average standard for industrial areas in the vicinity, and that resistance by current owners would be low to change if the market value for the land is higher with a Residential zone. Using an assessment framework from the 2007 Industrial Land Strategy for Metropolitan Adelaide, it is concluded that the Mary / Dan Street area is not contiguous with other industrial activities, is not well located to supply chains and service providers, does not offer potential for expansion of existing businesses


City of Salisbury

Analysis

f) 41

on site, does not take advantage of existing or proposed infrastructure or economic development, does not provide sufficient space for adequate parking and turning space for industrial vehicles, does not offer potential for 24 hour operation, and has adjoining use constraints. Within the City of Salisbury context, significant economic and infrastructure development activity is, and will continue to be, focussed around the Northern Expressway, Edinburgh Parks, Cavan and the Greenfields industrial areas.

The DPA proposes the Mary / Dan Street area become a Residential Zone. Continuation use rights will apply to existing lawful activities, but the new direction of residential development will result in requirements for acoustic treatment and management for both industry and residential uses within the area. Proposals will require compliance with EPA standards determined through the Environment Protection Act 1993 and the Environment Protection (Noise) Policy 2007.

Policy Outcome: Mary Dan Street area to be identified as Residential Zone with recognition of the existing

non-residential activities and the transition period to eventual residential by

accommodating both residential and non residential uses and rights in accordance with

EPA standards and guidelines.

3.3.11 Metropolitan Open Space System (MOSS) and Open Space

Mawson Lakes has 189 hectares of open space, 70 hectares of lakes and waterways, and 26km of walking and bike trails. The main lake is used for sporting activities as well providing amenity value. The University of South Australia grounds include ovals and a golf course. The Dry Creek Linear Park extends through Mawson Lakes and provides a central spine that provides walking and cycling paths and acts as a link within Mawson Lakes and with adjacent areas. The Greenfields wetlands at Salisbury Highway are over 114 hectares in area, and were first established 1990. It provides biodiversity habitat, flood protection and retention, enhancement of the landscape, improved water quality and aquifer storage and recovery. There is a nature trail and boardwalk. The Metropolitan Open Space System is a network of public and privately owned land of an open and natural character in and around Metropolitan Adelaide that provides a contrast to the built environment, acts as a buffer, assists in conservation of habitats, provides corridors for wildlife movement, accommodates recreation and sporting activities , and provides for stormwater management. The MOSS is recognised in the ‘30 Year Plan for Greater Adelaide’. The early versions of the State Planning Policy Library contained zone modules specific to MOSS. The current version has integrated the previous MOSS policies into the Open Space Zone. The DPA proposes to designate the Dry Creek corridor and the Salisbury Wetlands as an Open Space Zone. The majority of the University sports fields will be identified as a Public Safety Area policy area within the Innovation Precinct in order to fulfil the needs of the aircraft noise requirements and the public safety area for the operations of Parafield Airport. The recreation activities of the University sports fields will continue. Local open spaces will be zoned in accordance with the surrounding zone, predominantly as a Residential Zone.


City of Salisbury

Analysis

e) 42

A part of the land owned by the Caltex Australia Pty Ltd on the corner of Main North Road and Montague Road will be affected by an intention to recognise the river and adjust the zone line over part of the Caltex land.

Policy Outcome: The Dry Creek corridor and the Salisbury Wetlands to zoned as Open Space.

Part of the University of South Australia sports fields to be identified as a policy

area - Public Safety Area.

Local open spaces and buffer areas to be zoned as their surrounding zone.

Recognition of the Dry Creek alignment adjacent the Caltex Australia Pty Ltd

facility at the corner of Main North Road and Montague Road and adjust the zone

line over part of the Petrol Filling Station land.

3.3.12 Residential Density

Mawson Lakes has been developed with an original premise of higher residential densities. This has been

achieved through the provision of a variety of housing products including apartments in suitable areas such

as Mawson Central. The net densities (dwellings per hectare excluding public roads and public open space)

range from 25 dwellings per hectare to the order of 75 dwellings per hectare.

The 30-Year Plan for Greater Adelaide designates Mawson Lakes as a District Activity Centre and Transit-

Oriented Development site which has ramifications for residential densities in the area. The DPA policies

recognise this and provide for a full range of housing types, densities and heights to be accommodated in

the area.

Particular emphasis is given to medium to high densities in a medium to high rise form in and around the

District Centre and Mawson Interchange, both of which are located within the Urban Core Zone. The

surrounding Residential Zone provides for low-to-medium rise development.

There are restrictions on building heights in certain parts of Mawson Lakes to meet airport operational

requirements.

The State Planning Policy Library module for the Residential Zone recognises increased dwelling densities in

close proximity to centres, public transport routes and public open spaces. This is in line with the Mawson

Lakes master plans.

The State Planning Policy Library module for the Urban Core Zone contains policies that require a minimum

of 4 storeys and up to 10 storeys for the core area, and 2 to 4 storeys for a transition area. This is

dependent upon airport building height controls which apply to Mawson Lakes. The town centre area is

affected by three differing height control requirements that require referral to the Airport. The current

building height controls require either referral for all structures, structures greater than 15m (3 stories) or

greater than 45m (more than 10 stories).


City of Salisbury

Analysis

f) 43

Policy Outcome: A Policy Area for the Residential Zone of the Mawson Lakes area will recognise the

existing character of the area. The Urban Core Zone module will recognise and promote

higher density development around the town centre and interchange area, with regard

to the Building Height Controls required for airport operational safety.

3.3.13 Mawson Connector, Transport Linkages and Interchange

The constructed road, now called Elder Smith Road, is a two-lane 2.4km long connector from Salisbury

Highway to Main North Road with grade separation over the rail line and signalised intersections at

Salisbury Highway, Main North Road and at Main Street. There is a 1.1km long road reserve ready for

future road construction between Salisbury Highway and Port Wakefield Road. Road widening has been set

aside to make the current single lane each way design a two lane design. The Mawson Lakes development

has resulted in minimal access directly onto Elder Smith Road, Main North Road and Salisbury Highway.

Elder Smith Road links the Mawson Lakes development across the rail line, provides future access potential

to the Cross Keys Industrial precinct within Parafield Airport, is an alternative access to the Town Centre

reducing congestion on Mawson Lakes Boulevard, and connects the bus/rail interchange.

The anticipated Northern Connector is proposed to connect the Northern Expressway with Salisbury

Highway. The design proposals include a road connection at the intersection of the future Elder Smith Road

extension to Port Wakefield Road.

The Mawson Lakes area is well serviced with transport linkages and an interchange. It is bounded by Main

North Road on its eastern boundary, Montague Road on its southern boundary and Port Wakefield Road on

its western boundary. Internally the area is bisected by Salisbury Highway and Elder Smith Road. This latter

road along with Mawson Lakes Boulevard, which runs primarily through the residential areas of the

development from Main North Road to Montague Road, provides good access to the town centre.

Public transport is catered for with regular bus and train services both available, with a primary focus being

provided at the bus/train interchange established to the north of the town centre. The rail lines are the

Adelaide to Gawler line passenger line and an interstate freight line.

Mawson Lakes is identified in The 30-Year Plan for Greater Adelaide as a Transit Orient Development, a

Park and Ride station and also as a Transport Interchange site. The Interchange has ground level car

parking. It is considered that this ground level car park could turn into a multi-deck carpark with

commercial tenancy ground floor options subject to financial viability. This would help activate the area

around the Interchange and improve the pedestrian linkages.

Parafield Airport is adjacent Mawson Lakes and provides private passenger and small freight services. The

Master Plan for Parafield Airport identifies opportunities to provide services to the mining areas of the

State.

Policy Outcome: The ground level carpark at the Interchange is identified as having the potential to be a

future multideck carpark with commercial and retail ground floor tenancies to improve the

pedestrian linkages and activation.


City of Salisbury

Analysis

e) 44

3.3.14 State Planning Policy Library Modules

When the Council began the Mawson Lakes DPA, the State Planning Policy Library was in version 2. The

current version is 6. Consideration of the various modules has occurred with each version release. It is only

the latest version which contains modules that reflect the nature of the Mawson Lakes development and

the intended Development Plan directions.

Council has undertaken a BDP and General DPA which converted the current Development Plan to adopt

the relevant modules and format of the State Planning Policy Library. This DPA introduced objectives and

principles across all zones and general provisions. Many of the investigations undertaken for this DPA will

be addressed through the recent introduction of State Planning Policy Library modules through the BDP

and General DPA.

Policy Outcome: To use Version 6 of the State Planning Policy library.

3.3.15 Quality Urban Design

The urban design elements have been managed through encumbrances, building requirements, and design

guidelines. This was required throughout the development life to meet the standards sought by the

developers which were often outside of the Development Plan controls and in place of the general

Development Plan provisions of the current zoning.

The encumbrance has a sunset clause that will result in the encumbrance control lapsing on 1st January

2015. It will be necessary to have in place detailed Development Plan provisions by then to ensure

continuity as far as possible. Not all of the encumbrance controls and guidelines will be able to be

incorporated into the DPA because they are beyond the limitations empowered in a Development Plan.

The State introduced the Residential Development Code in 2009 to simplify and speed up standard

planning and building approvals for house construction. It is based on designing houses and outbuildings to

a minimum standard of criteria to receive approvals. The State Planning Policy Library modules have been

drafted by the State to reflect the Residential Code standards. Local variations introduced in this DPA are

consistent with the intent of the Residential Code and State Planning Policy Library.

Car parking allocation is a significant feature of urban design and can impact on design initiatives should it

be over emphasised or undersupplied. Mawson Lakes has developed on the basis of shared parking

provisions. Mawson Central is the mixed use area in which the majority of retail, office, commercial,

entertainment, educational and community facilities are provided. Car parking allocation has been worked

through the master plan process. The State Planning Policy Library provisions will apply for car parking land

use rates in general, with this DPA introducing a new Table “Off street vehicle parking arrangements’. This

is linked to the Urban Core Zone and its policies.

There are opportunities to facilitate the Interchange car park to becoming a deck carpark with commercial

tenancies at ground level to better link the Interchange proper and the rest of Mawson Central.


City of Salisbury

Analysis

f) 45

The intention is to ensure that the urban form of Mawson Lakes is not overcome with car parking provision.

Mixed use and shared car parking principles will apply.

An existing Car Parking Fund applies to the area known as Mawson Central. An updated Concept Plan is

proposed to be introduced to more clearly identify the area affected by the Fund.

Policy Outcome: Introduce the relevant encumbrance, building requirements and design guidelines that can

be applied under the Development Act and Regulations into the DPA planning policies and

principles of development control that are necessary beyond the State Planning Policy

Library modules.

The BDP and General DPA introduced policies on car parking rates and introduced a new

Table “Off Street Vehicle Parking”.

Introduce a new concept plan to clearly identify the area affected by the existing Mawson

Lakes Car Parking Fund.

The ground level carpark at the Interchange is identified as having the potential to be a

future multi-deck carpark with commercial and retail ground floor tenancies to improve

the pedestrian linkages and activation.

3.3.16 Water Sensitive Use

Water sensitive urban design (WSUD) is an approach which integrates the management of all water

resources and the total water cycle into the urban development process. WSUD includes:

Utilising water saving measures within and outside domestic, commercial, industrial and

institutional premises to minimise requirements for drinking and non-drinking water supplies

Storage, treatment and beneficial use of runoff (at building and street level, including stormwater

Treatment and reuse of wastewater

Using vegetation for treatment purposes, water efficient landscaping and enhancing biodiversity

and amenity.

Mawson Lakes was master planned to incorporate WSUD. Under the Encumbrance all development is

required to be connected to the Mawson Lakes Recycled Water Scheme with the water used for various

uses, including watering of landscaping and gardens and toilet flushing.

The system is designed to distribute a mixture of treated wastewater from the Bolivar Waste Water

Treatment Plant and stormwater harvested in Salisbury which has been treated through an engineered

wetlands treatment. The water is stored in aquifers and pumped to properties for park use, car washing,

toilets and other household garden needs. The system achieves a 50% reduction on reliance of potable

water.


City of Salisbury

Analysis

e) 46

There is also a lake top up system in place which combines a separate roof water connection system from

surrounding dwellings. When rainfall is low, the lakes are topped up by harvested stormwater from the

aquifers.

The general Water Sensitive Design policies within Council’s Development Plan will apply to all of the

Council area. There will be a need to incorporate the purple treatment connection requirements to new

dwellings and commercial premises after the encumbrances cease. This will occur by identifying a

requirement in the Desired Character statements and principles and objectives for the relevant zones and

policy areas which will allow enforcement through the development assessment process.

Policy outcome: The general Development Plan policies will apply and a specific reference in the Desired

Future Character Statement and objectives and principles of development control relevant

to Mawson Lakes.

3.3.17 Sustainable Development

The development of Mawson Lakes is predicated on sound environmental fundamentals. The following are

examples:

A street pattern that provides a mainly north south orientation.

Integration of Dry Creek Linear Park, large water features and pedestrian networks that encourage

walking and cycling.

Higher densities in close to the District centre and Interchange facilitating walking to shops, the

University and Technology Park and linking to public transport.

Requirements for energy and water efficient developments, designed to meet thermal and other

environmental standards. Buildings are to be fitted with building management systems to assist in

the attainment of greater energy efficiencies.

Use of Water Sensitive Urban Design.

Policy Outcome: DPA policies to reinforce sustainable practices.

3.3.18 Desired Character Statements

Desired Character Statements will be applied to the zones and policy areas relevant to Mawson Lakes in

order to assist setting the preferred development directions.


City of Salisbury

Analysis

f) 47

3.3.19 Impact if Development Plan not amended

The risk to Council if this Development Plan Amendment is not created for Mawson Lakes is that the

current control over the development will cease once the Developer completes its obligations, and comes

under Council control. The current policies within the Development Plan are not sufficiently robust or

detailed to ensure the continuation of a quality development in accordance with the Mawson Lakes

intention. If the policies are not enhanced, the risk to Council is that unsatisfactory development will occur.


City of Salisbury

Analysis

e) 48

4. Recommended Policy Changes

Following is a list of the recommended policy changes based on the investigations of this DPA:

Sharp Court industry area to be zoned as Industry.

The rail corridor to be zoned as Industry - Infrastructure Policy Area

The Hudson Road area and the corner area at Main North Road corner and Montague Road to be zoned Commercial.

The residential areas of Mawson Lakes to be zoned Residential with a Policy Area recognising the encumbrance controls. An area of current wetlands adjacent Shoalhaven Circuit, Hindmarsh Circuit, Caswell Circuit, Broadwater Crescent, and Carlett Street is proposed to be zoned as Residential.

Mawson Central, Mawson Central West, The University of South Australia, Technology Park, Mawson Lakes School to become an Urban Core Zone. This Zone contains a Core area and a Transition area. The Core area within the Urban Core Zone will be designated as the District Centre extent. The remainder of the area will be the Transition Area. Mawson Lakes School West Campus to be in the Transition Area. Different residential densities are identified in line with the State BDP modules for the Core area and the Transition area.

The Dry Creek corridor, Sir Douglas Mawson Lake, Mobara Park and the Salisbury Wetlands to be zoned as Open Space.

Endeavour College, the University of South Australia, 86 Mawson Lakes Boulevard, and the majority of Technology Park are in a designated Mawson Innovation Area Policy Area which is within the Urban Core Zone.

Mary / Dan Street area to be within the Residential Zone with a specific Policy Area to manage the mix of uses.

A Policy Area to be created over the University sports fields south of the Parafield Airport runway to recognise public safety policies. The Policy area extent allows for the proposed extension on the airport land of the airport runway 03L/21R as identified in the Airport Master Plan.

A policy area to be created identifying the main shopping area bounded by Main Street, Light Common, Garden Terrace and Mawson Lakes Boulevard.

the Open Space Zone boundary of the Dry Creek corridor to be adjusted over part of the Caltex Petrol Filling Station land at the corner of Main North and Montague Roads.

To use Desired Character Statements for the Mawson Lakes Residential Policy Area, Mawson Innovation Policy Area, Mary / Dan Street Policy Area, Public Safety Policy Area, and the Main Shopping Policy Area.

Introduction of a Concept Plan identifying the extent of the area affected by the Mawson Lakes Car Parking Fund

To use Version 6 of the State Planning Policy Library


City of Salisbury

Analysis

f) 49

Amend Maps, Plans and Tables within the Development Plan.

A comprehensive summary, including a summary of the conclusions drawn from the investigations, is

contained in the Appendices.

5. Consistency with the Residential Code

The Residential Development Code was introduced in 2009 to make simpler, faster and cheaper planning

and building approvals for home construction and renovation.

The development of Mawson Lakes has occurred in accordance with design guidelines, encumbrance

requirements and building requirements. These generally exceed the standards of the Residential

Development Code, and if not, reflect the Code. Schedule 4 of the Development Regulations 2008 already

identifies the Residential Zone in Salisbury as being an area that the Residential Development Code applies.

This DPA seeks to convert part of the existing zoning to Residential Zone. Therefore there will not be a need

to alter the gazetted residential code areas.

The Residential Development Code will not apply to the Urban Core Zone because of the desired intensity

of development. It will be necessary to exclude this area from the Code when the zone is introduced into

the Development Plan.

6. Statement of statutory compliance

Section 25 of the Development Act 1993 prescribes that the DPA must assess the extent to which the

proposed amendment:

accords with the Planning Strategy

accords with the Statement of Intent

accords with other parts of council’s Development Plan

complements the policies in Development Plans for adjoining areas

accords with relevant infrastructure planning

satisfies the requirements prescribed by the Development Regulations 2008.

6.1 Accords with the Planning Strategy

Relevant strategies from the Planning Strategy are summarised in this document. This DPA is consistent

with the direction of the Planning Strategy.


City of Salisbury

Analysis

e) 50

6.2 Accords with the Statement of Intent

The DPA has been prepared in accordance with the Statement of Intent agreed to on 24th October 2014. In

particular, the proposed investigations outlined in the Statement of Intent have been have been addressed

in Section 3 of this document.

6.3 Accords with other parts of the Development Plan

The policies proposed in this DPA are consistent with the format, content and structure of the City of

Salisbury Development Plan.

6.4 Complements the policies in the Development Plans for adjoining

areas

The DPA proposes to introduce the relevant zone modules from the State Planning Policy Library, with the

intent of reflecting the status of Mawson Lakes as a transit oriented development and key activity centre

within the 30 Year Plan for Greater Adelaide. Accordingly, the policies proposed in this DPA will not affect

and will complement the policies of Development Plans for adjoining areas.

6.5 Accords with relevant infrastructure planning

This DPA complements current infrastructure planning for the Council area, as discussed in section 2.3.2 of

this document.

6.6 Satisfies the requirements prescribed by the Regulations

The requirements for public consultation (Regulation 11) and the public meeting (Regulation 12) associated

with this DPA will be met.


City of Salisbury

References/Bibliography

f) 51


Alistair Tutte & URPS ‘Salisbury Centres and Bulky Goods Sites Review’ March 2007.

Annand & Associates Urban Design and TTM Consulting “Mawson Central Car Parking Strategy’ July 2011

Bassett Acoustics “Assessment of Aircraft Noise Exposure and Housing Construction Requirements at

Proposed Residential Development Parafield Gardens” 19th December 1995 Report A4927 RO1

City of Salisbury, Salisbury City Plan 2020, “Salisbury, Sustainable Futures September 2008

City of Salisbury, Salisbury Community Development Strategy, “Salisbury, the Living City” September 2008

City of Salisbury, Salisbury Economic Development Strategy, “Salisbury, Shaping the Future” September

2008

City of Salisbury, Salisbury Environmental and Climate Change Strategy, “Salisbury, Sustaining Our

Environment” September 2008

City of Salisbury, Wetlands and Water

http://www.salisbury.sa.gov.au/Our_City/Environment/Wetlands_and_Water

City of Salisbury “Salisbury Heritage Survey” Dept of Environment and Planning 1991

City of Salisbury ‘City of Salisbury and Federal Government partnership 2007’

City of Salisbury ‘City of Salisbury Development Plan Review (Section 30) 2002’

City of Salisbury ‘City of Salisbury Development Plan Review (Section 30/ Strategic Directions Report) draft

2008, updated 2012.

City of Salisbury ‘City of Salisbury Development Plan’

City of Salisbury ‘Discussion Paper Development Options Mary/Dan Street Precinct, Mawson Lakes’

Delfin, Mary Dan Village Report July 2004

Delfin, Mawson Lakes Community Lifestyle > Open Spaces

http://www.delfin.com.au/llweb/mawsonlakes/main.nsf/all/cl_openspaces

Delfin Lend Lease, Water and Energy Efficiency Requirements Mawson Lakes Development January 2007

Delfin/Mawson Lakes, Building Requirements, “Commercial, Mixed Use and Apartment Development”

August 2008

Delfin/Mawson Lakes, Encumbrance Building & Development Requirements, “Commercial/Retail & Mixed

Use Development” August 2005 and April 2007

Delfin/Mawson Lakes, Encumbrance Requirements, “All Homes Built at Mawson Lakes”

http://www.salisbury.sa.gov.au/Our_City/Environment/Wetlands_and_Water

http://www.delfin.com.au/llweb/mawsonlakes/main.nsf/all/cl_openspaces


City of Salisbury


e) 52

Delfin/Mawson Lakes, Encumbrance Requirements, “All Medium Density/Town House Development at

Mawson Lakes” August 2008

Delfin/Mawson Lakes, Encumbrance Requirements, “Commercial, Mixed Use and Apartment Development

at Mawson Lakes” August 2008

Delfin/Mawson Lakes, Mawson Lakes, “Solar Water Heating” February 2004

Delta Environmental Consulting Bennett Road Vernal Pools Understanding- the first step to restoration.

February 2002

Delta Environmental Consulting, Elder Smith Road (formerly Mawson Connector) Monitoring mitigation

success – Parafield airport vernal pools, July 2006

Delta Environmental Consulting PAL vernal pools – health, road and industrial estate impacts, mitigation

and management. December 2002

Denton Corker Marshall, Mawson Lakes Campus Masterplan 2002-2010 University of South Australia

August 2003

Department of Planning and Local Government, Better Development Plans Planning Policy Library, Versions

2,3,4,5 & 6

Dept of Infrastructure and Transport Airport Environment ‘ Draft National Airports Safeguarding

Framework’ Sept 2011 and March 2012-03-30

Dimasi 2006 ‘Mawson Lakes, Adelaide. Potential for Retail Facilities

DOTARS “Guidance Material for Selecting and Providing Aircraft Noise Information” 2003 ISBN 0-646

42287-1

Endeavour College, http://www.endeavour.sa.edu.au/partnerships/unisa

Environment Protection Authority, “The Environment Protection (Noise) Policy 2007” March 2008

Government of South Australia, “Mawson Connector (Elder Smith Road) & Mawson Transport Hub”

http://www.infrastructure.sa.gov.au/completed_projects/mawson_connector

Government of South Australia, Technology Park Adelaide http://www.techpark.sa.gov.au/about

Government of South Australia, “The Mawson Transport Hub - A strategic transport initiative for South

Australia’s future”

Government of South Australia, “The 30-Year Plan for Greater Adelaide – A volume of the South Australian

Planning Strategy” February 2010

Government of South Australia, Technology Park Adelaide http://www.techpark.sa.gov.au/about

Government of South Australia ‘State Strategic Plan 2007’

http://www.endeavour.sa.edu.au/partnerships/unisa

http://www.infrastructure.sa.gov.au/completed_projects/mawson_connector

http://www.techpark.sa.gov.au/about

http://www.techpark.sa.gov.au/about


City of Salisbury


f) 53

Government of South Australia ‘Metropolitan Adelaide Planning Strategy 2006’

Government of South Australia ‘Metropolitan Adelaide Industrial Land Strategy 2007’

Government of South Australia ‘South Australian Strategic Infrastructure Plan 2005/6 – 2014/15’

Govt of South Australia ‘Understanding Residential Densities A Pictorial Handbook of Adelaide Examples’

Nov 2006

Hallinan, G 1990 ‘The Multifunction Polis-The Facts’ in R E Mouer & Y Sugimoto (eds) The MFP Debate A

Background Reader La Trobe University Press Victoria Australia pp 79-84

Issarayangyun, Tharit “Aircraft Noise and Public Health: Acoustical Measurement and Social Survey Around

Sydney (Kingsford Smith) Airport” Doctoral Thesis March 2005 University of New South Wales

Land Management Corporation, Technology Park Design Guidelines May 2002

Maurovic, Richard “The Meat Game- A history of the Gepps Cross Abattoirs and Livestock Markets” 2007

Wakefield Press ISBN 978 1 86254 726 1

MFP (The Levels) Plan Amendment Report by the Minister 19th December 1996

Ministerial draft DPA ‘City of Salisbury Mawson Lakes Development Zone’ 2007

Parafield Airport Limited, Parafield Airport 2004-2009 Master Plan November 2004

Parafield Airport Limited, Preliminary Draft Master Plan Parafield Airport March 2012

Parliament of South Australia, 13th Report of the Economic and Finance Committee on Economic and

Financial Aspects of the operations of the MFP Development Corporation 30th June 1994

Planning SA Advisory Notice 20 – Site Contamination. December 2001

Parker, P 1998 ‘The Multifunction Polis 1987-97: An International Failure or Innovative Local Project?’

Pacific Economic Paper No. 283

Postcards, Salisbury Wetlands,

http://www.postcards-sa.com.au/features2010/salisbury_wetlands.html

Resource and Environmental Management Pty Ltd “Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment Dan Street

and Mary Street Properties, Mawson Lakes 15th September 2003”

Soil and Groundwater Consulting “Environmental Site Assessment – Phase 1 Land East of Mary Street

Mawson Lakes Sept 2002”

Southwick Goodyear Pty Ltd “Land Use Valuation Study for Mary / Dan Street, Mawson Lakes” June 2012

Vivienne Wood Heritage Consultant Pty Ltd “UniSA Mawson Lakes Campus: Indigenous Cultural Heritage

Study” August 2000

http://www.postcards-sa.com.au/features2010/salisbury_wetlands.html


Bu the Council

Appendices Executive Summary

i) 3

Schedule 4a Certificate

SCHEDULE 4A

Development Act 1993 – Section 25 (10) – Certificate - Public Consultation

CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER THAT A

DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT (DPA) IS SUITABLE FOR THE PURPOSES OF PUBLIC CONSULTATION

Terry Sutcliffe, as Acting Chief Executive Officer of the City of Salisbury, certify that the Statement of

Investigations, accompanying this DPA, sets out the extent to which the proposed amendment or

amendments-

(a) accord with the Statement of Intent (as agreed between the City of Salisbury and the Minister

under section 25(1) of the Act) and, in particular, all of the items set out in Regulation 9 of the

Development Regulations 2008; and

(b) accord with the Planning Strategy, on the basis that each relevant provision of the Planning

Strategy that related to the amendment or amendment has been specifically identified and

addressed, including by an assessment of the impacts of each policy reflected in the amendment

or amendments against the Planning Strategy, and on the basis that any policy which does not

fully or in part accord with the Planning Strategy has been specifically identified and an

explanation setting out the reason or reasons for the departure from the Planning Strategy has

been included in the Statement of Investigation; and

(c) accord with the other parts of the Development Plan (being those parts not affected by the

amendment or amendments); and

(d) complement the policies in the Development Plans for adjoining areas; and

(e) satisfy the other matters (if any) prescribed under section 25(10)(e) of the Development Act 1993.

The following person or persons have provided advice to the council for the purposes of section 25(4) of the

Act:

Peter Jansen, Principle Strategic Planner

Amanda Berry, Policy Planner


City of Salisbury


e) 4

APPENDICES

Appendix A Assessment of the Planning Strategy.

Appendix B Assessment of Council’s Strategic Directions Report

Appendix C Summary of Recommended Policy Changes

Appendix D Planning Policy Library update

h) 5

APPENDIX A

30 Year Plan for Greater Adelaide

30 Year Plan for Greater Adelaide 2010 DPA Response

New transit corridors, growth areas, transit-oriented developments and activity centres

2 Locate the majority of Greater Adelaide’s urban growth within existing built-up areas through increases in

density in strategic locations.

This DPA will not hinder the attainment of this policy. The proposed Policies recognises the identification of

Mawson Lakes as a District centre and TOD site (in the 30-Year Plan) and provides for increased densities and

building heights.

3 Concentrate new growth within metropolitan Adelaide in transit corridors, transit-oriented developments

and activity centres so that the urban character of the majority of neighbourhoods remains largely unchanged.

This DPA will not hinder the attainment of this policy. The proposed policies recognises the identification of

Mawson Lakes as a District centre and TOD site (in the 30-Year Plan) and provides for increased densities and

building heights. The majority of the residential area at Mawson Lakes will remain largely unchanged.

5 Activate and rejuvenate higher – order activity centres and provide for integrated mixed uses around

transport interchanges and wherever possible at the neighbourhood level.

This DPA recognises the significance of the Interchange at Mawson Lakes and includes it within the proposed

Urban Core Zone and District Centre identification

7 Ensure that the bulk of new residential development in Greater Adelaide is low –to–medium–rise

development (including detached dwellings) and confine high – rise developments to the 14 identified transit–

oriented developments.

The proposed Urban Core Zone policies provides for medium to high rise developments in keeping with Mawson

Lakes designation as a District centre and TOD site. The surrounding proposed Residential (Mawson Lakes) Zone

recognises low-to-medium rise development already built.

8 Designate and protect transit corridors so a significant amount of Greater Adelaide’s net dwellings growth

and net jobs growth can be generally located within 800 metres of a major transit corridor or within 400 metres

of other transit corridors.

A significant portion of Mawson Lakes is located within 800 metres of the Gawler rail line which is identified as a

major transit corridor. While much of this area has only been developed in the last 15 years and is therefore

unlikely to be available for significant redevelopment in the near future, increased density development

opportunities are provided in the Urban Core Zone.

9 Designate five fixed-line transit corridors (see Maps D2 and D3) as State significant areas. The Department of

Planning and Local Government will prepare Structure plans for these corridors in partnership with other state

government agencies and local government.

The DPA does not preclude future structure planning by the State along the corridors/

12 Ensure Structure Plans clearly designate key precincts within the transit corridor, which include mixed-use

transit-oriented developments, activity centres, open-space precincts and, where appropriate, employment

lands.

While the preparation of Structure Plans is to be undertaken by DPLG, this DPA will provide policies to guide the

forms of development listed.

14 Concentrate higher densities and medium-rise development around mixed-use activity centres and railway,

tram and bus stations.

DPA policies will achieve this.

15 Ensure there is an effective transition between higher densities and medium-rise development (near shops DPA policies will reflect the already achieve separation and transition that has occurred through the master plan


City of Salisbury

Appendices

Appendix B – Assessment of Council’s Strategic Directions Report

e) 6

and stations) and existing low-rise detached housing. process. The Urban Core Zone will comprise a Core area and a Transition Area.

18 Provide for 14 new transit-oriented developments to be located across the region and encourage planning

for transit-oriented style developments in appropriate locations.

Mawson Lakes is designated on a number of Maps in the 30-Year Plan as a transit-oriented development site. This

DPA recognises this and supports TOD style developments in the Urban Core Zone.

19 Locate transit-oriented development next to mass transit stations and interchanges (rail, bus or tram) and

connect to existing activity centres where possible.

TOD style development is supported in proximity to the Interchange and connection is provided to the District

level activity centre – both are located in the Urban Core Zone.

20 Subject transit-oriented developments to very high design requirements as part of the precinct planning

process.

A substantial portion of the TOD site has already been developed in accordance with the very high design

requirements set out in the Mawson Lakes encumbrances and development guidelines. This DPA will continue to

require this very high level of design requirement by incorporating relevant polices from the encumbrances and

guidelines into the proposed zones’ policies.

21 Design transit oriented-developments to be walkable and cycling friendly, and provide safe connections to

surrounding communities.

Policies in the DPA support the development of walking and cycle friendly neighbourhoods with safe connections

provided along the Dry Creek Linear park which traverses a significant portion of Mawson Lakes.

24 Require high quality open space in all transit-oriented developments. The DPA promotes the requirement to continue to provide high quality open space, particularly in the higher

density areas forming the primary TOD site

25 Adopt a typology of activity centres, as set out in the Activity centre typology table in Appendix 3 and

represented in Map D6.

Mawson Lakes is shown as a District Activity Centre on Map E4. Appendix 3 describes ‘District centres’ as ‘Large

centres that provide a range of retail, office, community and entertainment facilities. Shopping usually provides

the most significant role, with associated civic, community, commercial and recreational services.’ The DPA

recognises this District Centre designation with appropriate policies in the Urban Core Zone and via the creation of

a “Main Shopping Policy Area.

26 Designate specialist centres that contain clusters of key economic and service activity where appropriate.

For example, clusters of defence, innovation, export, legal and educational services.

The ‘Technology Park Adelaide’ area of Mawson Lakes is shown as a Specialist Activity Centre on Map E4. The DPA

will recognise this designation with the Technology Park Adelaide area being defined in the Mawson Innovation

Policy Area and having specific policies to recognise the high tech development purposes.

29 Ensure activity centres promote mixed-use development rather than separate residential, commercial and

retail developments.

The “District centre” activities are located within the Urban Core Zone where policies support the development of

mixed uses.

30 Develop higher-density residential developments within and adjacent to activity centres. The DPA supports this aim and provides for medium to high densities in a medium to high rise form in and around

the District centre.

31 Minimise the impact of commercial activities on residential communities by ensuring mixed-use centres The policies proposed in this DPA recognise the need to minimise adverse impacts on adjoining development in

h) 7

comply with Structure Plan guidelines. mixed use areas.

Urban design

2 Maximise and increase the quality of public spaces, and require excellent design in the public realm. Over 30 % of the Mawson Lakes area is provided for open space. In addition, the DPA promotes the requirement

to continue to provide high quality open space

3 Require new mixed-use medium and high-rise developments to provide active street frontages (such as

shops, services and restaurants) to encourage connectivity and increase public safety.

The Desired Character statement and specific policies in the Urban Core Zone require the provision of active

frontages to medium and high rise developments.

6 Structure Plans for Greenfield developments, urban infill and transit-oriented developments will set

objectives and guidelines for the quality of building performance outcomes in terms of:

climate response (for example, solar orientation and ventilation)

energy use

water use and recycling

noise attenuation and air quality

improving the aesthetics of the public realm.

While the preparation of a Structure Plan for the Mawson Lakes TOD is yet to be undertaken by DPTI, this DPA

includes policies on the matters listed in Policy 6. The overall development of Mawson Lakes is predicated on

sound environmental fundamentals and this will continue.

10 Promote a highly permeable and connected grid street structure in new growth areas and transit-oriented

development to encourage walking and cycling.

Mawson Lakes development has complied with this policy.

11 Provide safe and attractive streetscapes in growth areas and transit-oriented developments through street

tree plantings and lighting.

Mawson Lakes has been recognised as a World Health Organistation Certified Safe Community. The DPA policies

promote urban design that recognises safety issues.

13 Create a clear transition between new higher-density development (near shops and railway stations) and

existing detached housing precincts, such that housing densities will decrease in line with the distance from

transport thoroughfares and railway stations.

The DPA policies support this approach with higher densities promoted in proximity to the District centre and

Interchange, with lower densities as the distance from these activities increases.

14 Ensure local heritage places and areas of heritage value are identified and incorporated into planning policy. DPA recognises the two State listed items.

15 Capitalise on the role heritage places and areas play in creating a sense of place through techniques such as

adaptive re-use and clearly described character statements in Structure Plans.

See comment above.

Communities and social inclusion

7 Create safe and inviting public spaces that will encourage community participation by a wide range of people. The DPA supports the existing community participation and does not preclude continuation.

8 Provide engaging spaces where young people can congregate for social activities in a positive setting. Mawson Lakes has many community settings that include youth participation. The DPA does not preclude any

segment of the population.

9 Give priority to pedestrian, wheelchair, gopher and cycle movement in neighbourhoods, which will ensure

greater access for people with less mobility, particularly children, the elderly and people with prams.

The DPA supports easy movement in neighbourhoods with an emphasis on cycling and walking and general

permeability through linkages and footpath design.


City of Salisbury

Appendices


e) 8

Housing mix, affordability and competitiveness

3 Integrate a mixture of competitive housing styles, types, sizes and densities into the wider housing market,

including medium-density low-rise and attached dwellings.

DPA policies provide for a full range of housing types, densities and heights to be accommodated in the area, with

particular emphasis on medium to high density development in the Urban Core Zone.

4 Ensure Structure Plans and Development Plans reflect the definitions of low-,medium- and high-density

housing provided in Box 1 and the definitions of low-, medium- (or mid-) and high-rise development provided in

Box 2.

Policies relating to housing densities and heights reflect the definitions in the 30-Year Plan.

5 Increase the total share of smaller housing, particularly around transport interchanges and collocated with

services such as health and retail.

Higher density, higher rise forms of residential development are encouraged in proximity to the Interchange. The

Interchange is located in the Urban Core Zone where a variety of uses, including health and retail facilities, are

located. This reflects existing master plan principles.

Affordable housing

1 Reinforce the state government policy that at least 15 per cent of new dwellings should meet the criteria for

affordable housing (of which five per cent is specifically for high needs housing) in significant new

developments and growth areas, including:

areas subject to Structure Plans and precinct planning, in particular new transit-oriented development and transit corridors

Affordable housing policies are included for the residential areas in the DPA.

4 Provide for the integration of new affordable housing with other new dwellings in developments to avoid

inappropriate concentrations of social housing.

Policy providing for the integration of affordable housing has been included for the residential areas in the DPA.

Health and wellbeing

1 Design pedestrian- and cycle-friendly areas in growth areas and existing neighbourhoods to promote active

communities.

While a substantial portion of the area has already been developed, past planning practices have resulted in a

pedestrian and cycle friendly area. These practices will continue for the remainder of the area and policies in the

DPA support these activities.

4 Increase housing density and encourage a variety of high-quality shops to locate near railway stations and

major bus stops so people can buy fresh food on their way home, rather than making a separate car journey.

The Interchange is well connected to the main shopping area with a permeable street pattern. In addition, the

zoning surrounding the Interchange is flexible, providing opportunities for smaller shops to locate in proximity.

Bus services are provided down Main Street, adjacent to the main shopping area.

The economy and jobs

h) 9

3 Concentrate jobs in the designated transit corridors and the 14 transit-oriented developments. .... Employment opportunities exist at the various commercial and retail enterprises, the University of South

Australia, and the Technology Park. The DPA does not restrict employment concentration along transit corridors

or transit oriented developments, except for the Mary Dan Street policy area being recognised as a preferred

residential area.

4 Promote mixed-use development in the transit corridors, activity centres and transit-oriented developments

to ensure jobs are situated close to where people live. ...

The Urban Core Zone promotes mixed development.

5 Promote, through the planning and design guidelines for the five fixed-line transit corridors, transit-oriented

developments and higher-order activity centres, a compatibility of uses by setting standards for noise and

creating buffer distances between potentially incompatible activities. ... Design guidelines will need to ensure

that mixed-use communities are of a high quality and liveable.

Policies are provided which require compatibility of mixed use land uses and design, siting and operation of

activities to ensure compliance with relevant noise standards. Buffering may be one means of achieving

appropriate acoustic levels. A number of policies are provided which require that development in the mixed use

area promotes quality and liveability.

Defence

27 Support and promote defence, science and technology clusters, linked by world-class road, rail and

telecommunications infrastructure and to universities.

The DPA will support the ongoing development of the defence technology clusters located at Technology Park

Adelaide in the proposed Mawson Innovation Policy Area..

28 Foster the development of defence companies and the winning of defence projects by securing land for

defence jobs around Adelaide’s three distinct defence precincts:

- Technology Park Adelaide (Mawson Lakes)

The DPA provides specific recognition for Technology Park Adelaide and policies which guide the nature and form

of development that can be accommodated in the proposed Mawson Innovation Policy Area.

29 Provide for appropriate buffers to residential developments to minimise conflicts between defence

developments and incompatible land uses.

While the defence developments envisaged in the Mawson Innovation Policy Area are of a high technology form

and are therefore not expected to create significant impacts, policies to control activities that might otherwise

cause avoid adverse impacts are provided.

Services

30 Integrate services sector jobs into new growth areas, activity centres, transit corridors and transit-oriented

developments.

The proposed Urban Core Zone accommodates a wide range of service sector employment opportunities

33 Locate government services in the higher-order activity centres and transit-oriented developments to create

viable clusters of activities to minimise unnecessary car trips.

The proposed Urban Core Zone supports the location of government services

34 Support and promote science and technology clusters at:

- Mawson Lakes (Technology Park Adelaide, University of South Australia campus).

The DPA provides specific recognition for the University of South Australia and Technology Park Adelaide in the

proposed Mawson Innovation Policy Area

Transport


City of Salisbury

Appendices


e) 10

1 Protect the transport functionality of road and rail corridors through planning policy in Development Plans. A number of existing policies in Council’s Development Plan provide protection of transport functionality. Direct

access from allotments to Main North and Elder Smith Roads is not minimised and vegetated buffers and/or

acoustic screening is provided, or can be provided, where required to avoid impact on the functionality of these

roads. In addition, significant acoustic mounding/fencing and landscaping is provided along the rail corridor to

minimise impacts on adjoining residential areas, with consequent benefits to the functionality of the rail corridor. 6 Give priority to increasing densities and designating types of services, such as retail, around existing

interchanges and planned upgrades of railway and tram stations and bus interchanges.

This DPA will facilitate the ongoing provision of higher density residential development in proximity to the existing

Interchange through the policies of the Urban Core Zone. Retail development is also facilitated in this zone and

policies are provided requiring links between the two land uses.

7 Plan for park and ride facilities at Mawson Lake to ensure outlying areas can be serviced by upgraded

transport networks.

Park and ride facilities are already provided at the Mawson Lakes Interchange, which provides both a train station

and bus interchange. This DPA will not affect the provision of these services.

8 Reinforce the role of bus interchanges in key strategic locations and centres (for example, Elizabeth, Mawson

Lakes)

See above.

12 Provide and extend a connected bicycle network across Greater Adelaide, using bike lanes and cycle ways as

shown on Map D16.

While Map D16 shows a green travel corridor along the Gawler rail corridor through the Mawson Lakes area, it

also notes that this concept is yet to be fully developed. This DPA does not hinder the eventual attainment of this

aim. While not shown on Map D16, the bike path along the Dry Creek Linear Park provides a significant east-west

link in this area.

14 Provide direct and safe cycling links to public transport stations and interchanges. Bicycle linkages already exist

Infrastructure

1 Maximise the location of economic and social infrastructure by:

- collocating government services in higher-order activity centres and transit-oriented developments - locating new housing growth in proximity - integrating health and educational facilities with transport services and locating them near retail

centres

This DPA supports the achievement of these aims by providing for a range of activities to be accommodated in the

Urban Core Zone, including government services, higher density housing, health and educational facilities and

retail development. Mawson Lakes is recognised as a District Centre.

Biodiversity

6 Enhance the urban biodiversity of metropolitan Adelaide by supporting the development of urban forests,

restoring watercourses, establishing linked networks of open space and encouraging the use of local indigenous

species.

This DPA supports this aim and recognises the Dry Creek Linear Park surrounding the realigned Dry Creek and links

to wetlands and other open spaces.

Greater Adelaide Open Space System

h) 11

2 Ensure open space is accessible by all communities and will:

- link, integrate and protect biodiversity assets and natural habitats - provide linkages to encourage walking and cycling to local activities, local activity centres and

regional centres - be multi-functional, multi-use (including the shared use of strategically located school facilities) and

able to accommodate changing use over time - incorporate the principles of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design for safety and

amenity - contain appropriate and low-maintenance species and locate trees to maximise access to shade - encourage passive recreation opportunities such as provision of a variety of paths and children’s

play equipment.

The Dry Creek Linear Park extends through the majority of the Mawson Lakes area and provides a central spine

that links various activities through the provision of walking and cycling paths. This facility is recognised, along

with the significant wetlands in the western portion of Mawson Lakes through the Open Space Zone. Other open

spaces, such as the University playing fields and the golf course are recognised within the Runway Public Safety

Policy Area and Mawson Innovation Policy Areas. Local open spaces are zoned in accordance with the surrounding

zone, generally a Residential Zone.

The implementation of CPTED principles, planting of appropriate species and provision of recreation opportunities

are all undertaken as a matter of course in the design and establishment of these facilities.

Greenways

10 Establish greenways along the major transit corridors, watercourses and linear parks. As previously discussed, this DPA does not hinder the establishment of a greenway along the rail corridor. It

recognises Dry Creek within the established Dry Creek Linear Park.

11 Plan and develop greenways to link parks, reserves and public facilities to provide walking and cycling

access.

See previous discussion on this matter.

13 Ensure that greenways are landscaped with local indigenous species where possible and incorporate water-

sensitive urban design techniques.

Local indigenous species are used in landscaping and Council has a preferred planting guideline for the area.

Water sensitive urban design techniques are employed and significant use is made of recycled water supplies.

Climate change

3 Implement the key actions that promote a more compact city, including collocation of services with transport

and mixed-use developments in transport corridors and around transport interchanges.

This DPA supports higher density residential and mixed use developments in proximity to the transport

Interchange.

7 Ensure the majority of new housing is carbon-efficient. As part of this policy, the proportion of low-rise

medium-density apartments and attached dwellings will be increased.

This DPA supports increased residential densities in the Urban Core Zone, both in low-medium and high rise

forms.

8 Confine high-rise buildings to the 14 transit-oriented developments. Higher building densities are possible in the Urban Core Zone subject to airport height limitations.

11 Set building standards and design guidelines to create more thermally and energy efficient buildings. The DPA proposes a number of policies that require energy and water efficient developments, designed to meet

thermal and other environmental requirements.

12 Reduce energy costs through the introduction of improved energy efficiency standards for new buildings. See above..

13 Create a more liveable urban environment through the establishment of a network of greenways, tree-lined

streets and open spaces, which will have a strong cooling effect on nearby new neighbourhoods and new

buildings.

See previous discussion on the provision of greenways and other open spaces.


City of Salisbury

Appendices


e) 12

14 Encourage commercial and industrial developers to include green buffers and shady areas in their

developments, to make workplaces more liveable.

Policies are proposed which require landscaping and shading to provide an improved amenity to developments.

Water

1 Incorporate water-sensitive urban design (WSUD) techniques in new developments to achieve water quality

and water efficiency benefits.

The DPA proposes that all development meet contemporary water efficiency requirements. In addition, all

development is required to be connected to the Recycled Water Scheme for use in watering of landscaping and

gardens and toilet flushing.

8 Ensure appropriate policy links and consistency between Stormwater Management Plans, Structure Plans and

Development Plans to address stormwater and flood management matters.

The Dry Creek Linear Park and extensive wetlands on the western side of Mawson Lakes have been designed to

minimise the potential for flooding of this area and further downstream.

h) 13

APPENDIX B

City of Salisbury Strategic Directions Report 2002 and 2012 draft update

Goal/Policy/Target DPA Response

1. Increase environmental sustainability of the City, which particular focus on

(i) climate change, (ii) sustainable energy use, (iii) waste recycling, reuse

and reduction, (iv) optimising ecologically sustainable urban development,

(v) conserving biodiversity and natural habitat and (vi) promoting

sustainable land, coast and water management practices;

DPA recognises and promotes building energy efficiency and water re-use

2. Increase the City’s greenfield and infill population by considering urban

renewal and urban expansion projects, while recognizing the necessity of

linking the location of population increases to localized and sustainable

economic growth zones (eg Defence Precinct), and physical and social

infrastructure requirements;

DPA recognises the existing design principles of being a mixed use environment with links to the

University of South Australia and Technology Park

3. Increase the City’s density in appropriate locations (eg TODs, activity

centres and main public transport corridors) thereby increasing access to

goods and services and promoting public transport usage.

DPA recognises the existing design principles of a higher density mixed use area as a Transit Oriented

Developmet and thereby provide housing variety and affordability.

4. Support the implementation of the Northern Connector and the Northern

Expressway, including maximising land use value adding opportunities (eg

creation of linked local economic growth zones such as activity centres and

industrial areas);

DPA recognises the existing structure and road linkages to the proposed Northern Connector and

Northern Expressway via currently Port Wakefield Road or the future Northern Connector.

5. Support knowledge based economies and learning communities (ie

expansion of the Mawson Innovation Precinct);

DPA recognises the links to the University of South Australia, Parafield Airport flight training, and schools

in Mawson Lakes and promotes the progress of the Mawson Innovation Precinct.

6. Increase the use of public transport by promoting the development of

transit oriented developments (TODs);

DPA promotes the development of Mawson Lakes as a Transit Oriented Development site and the links to

the rail services and bus services.


City of Salisbury

Appendices


e) 14

Goal/Policy/Target DPA Response

7. Increase housing affordability and availability, particularly near services

and facilities (eg TODs and centres);

DPA promotes the existing design principles of housing variety and affordability.

8. Address the implications of structural ageing within the community; DPA promotes flexible housing options

9. Increase the viability of centres and / or foster alternative uses and

recognise their importance as key community public places

DPA recognises the retail centre designation and nature of Mawson Lakes and aligns with planning

strategy typology and does not hinder development of other centres.

h) 15

APPENDIX C

Summary of Recommended Policy Changes

Issue Current Policy Comment and Recommended Policy Change

Sharp Court area Zoned as MFP (The Levels) Industrial activities occurring on sites. To be zoned as Industry, with associated

objectives and principles of development control. The BDP and General DPA is

converting the existing Development Plan to a BDP format. Planning controls should

be read in conjunction with BDP and General DPA.

The Rail Corridor Zoned as MFP (The Levels) To be zoned as Industry - Infrastructure Policy Area in the BDP and General DPA.

Interface issues have been considered in the development of the adjoining residential

areas but future considerations require the application of noise control measures.

Hudson Road area and Montague Road / corner Main

North Road area

Zoned as MFP (The Levels) Existing commercial activities of acceptable quality to be zoned as Commercial with

associated objectives and principles of development control. The BDP and General

DPA is converting the existing Development Plan to a BDP format. Planning controls

should be read in conjunction with BDP and General DPA.

Residential Village areas Zoned as MFP (The Levels) To become a Residential Zone, but with a Policy Area to allow separate policies for

requiring recycled water connections and some aspects of the encumbrances and

guidelines that can be applied through the Development Plan. The BDP and General

DPA will introduce the BDP format policies for the Residential Zone. Planning controls

should be read in conjunction with the BDP and General DPA.

Mawson Central, Mawson Central West, The

University of South Australia and Technology Park and

a District Centre extent.

Zoned as MFP (The Levels) Mawson Central, Mawson Central West, The University of South Australia, and

Technology Park to become an Urban Core Zone. The Core area within the Urban Core

Zone will be the District Centre extent and the remainder of the Urban Core Zone will

be the transition area as per the BDP module. This is a new module introduced in

Version 6 of the BDP. It will reflect a mixed use area, with higher residential density,

the extent of the District Centre area, and the TOD categorisation of Mawson Lakes

and the Interchange facility access.

Dry Creek corridor and the Salisbury Wetlands Zoned as MFP (The Levels) To be zoned as Open Space. The BDP and General DPA is converting the existing

Development Plan to a BDP format. Planning controls should be read in conjunction

with BDP and General DPA.


City of Salisbury

Appendices


e) 16


Technology Park and University of South Australia

relationships

Zoned as MFP (The Levels) Within the intended Urban Core Zone, but as the Mawson Innovation Policy Area. This

is to reflect as far as possible in an urban policy setting the business and research

relationships of the University of South Australia and the Technology Park.

Mary / Dan Street area Zoned as MFP (The Levels) An area of various industry and commercial activities that are of low amenity. Housing

has been built within the area. The area is to be within the Residential Zone with a

specific policy area to manage the transition period to accommodate both residential

and non residential uses.

Parafield Airport Runways safety areas Zoned as MFP (The Levels) A Public Safety Policy Area based on the Queensland Model to be created over the

University sports fields that will recognise the proposed extension of the airport

runway 03L/21R as identified in the Airport 2009 Master Plan.

District Retail area. Zoned as MFP (The Levels) Within the Urban Core Zone, a policy area will identify the main shopping area

bounded by Main Street, Light Common, Garden Terrace and Mawson Lakes

Boulevard. This will locate the higher level retail such as supermarkets in the policy

area. A District Centre identification will reinforce the appropriate locations within

Mawson Lakes for the higher level retail appropriate to its designation.

A District Centre classification to be created for the Mawson Central area and shown

on Structure Plan Map Sal/1 Overlay 1 Part B.

Dry Creek corridor adjacent Caltex Australia Pty Ltd

facility at corner of Main North Road and Montague

Road.

Zoned as MFP (The Levels) The Dry Creek corridor adjacent the Caltex Australia Pty Ltd facility at the corner of

Main North Road and Montague Road is within the Caltex facility land. The

development of the site results in a separation of the creek from the petrol facility.

The creek area is not used now or likely to be used in the business operations. It is

intended that the zone is aligned over part of the Petrol Filling Station land.

Mawson Lakes future development Zoned as MFP (The Levels) To use Desired Character Statements for the Mawson Lakes Residential Policy Area,

Mawson Innovation Policy Area, Mary / Dan Street Policy Area, Public Safety Policy

Area, and the Main Shopping Policy Area.

h) 17


Land use policy and other Development Plan

Amendments

Not relevant To use Version 6 of the BDP library and align the Mawson Lakes DPA with the BDP and

General DPA

DPA administration Not relevant Amend Maps, Plans and Tables within the Development Plan.


City of Salisbury

Appendices


e) 18

APPENDIX D

Planning Policy Library Update

Current Module New Module Comment / Noted Variations

Nil, but the City of Salisbury has undergone conversion

to BDP through its BDP and General Development Plan

Amendment.

Urban Core Zone in BDP version 6 A Core Area and a Transition Area have been identified. There is also a Mawson

Innovation Policy Area, a Runway Public Safety Policy Area and a Main Shopping Policy

Area. Separate Desired Character Statements apply to each of the Policy Areas.

Mawson Lakes is a District Centre classification and therefore the module has been

varied to reflect the higher order centre. There is no Main Street Policy Area and

therefore references to this in the module have been deleted where applicable.

The following zone modules in the BDP and General

DPA will apply to areas of Mawson Lakes:

Industry Zone and Infrastructure Policy Area

Commercial Zone

Residential Zone and a Mawson Lakes Policy Area and Mary / Dan Street Policy Area

Open Space Zone.

The Residential Zone module promoted in the BDP and General DPA will be varied

with the introduction of a:

Mawson Lakes Policy Area, which will identify specific requirements for water sensitive urban design measures some details previously controlled by encumbrances and guidelines.

and a Mary / Dan Street Policy Area which will identify the mixed use nature and transition away from industries and commercial activities to residential uses, and the need for recognition of noise treatments and standards of the EPA.

The BDP and General DPA also has the General

modules, Overlays, Zones, Tables and Mapping.

These may be varied as the meshing of the Mawson Lakes DPA and the BDP and

General DPA occurs.

h) 19

Current Module New Module Comment / Noted Variations


City of Salisbury

Appendices


e) 20

j)

City of Salisbury


The Amendment

For Consultation


City of Salisbury

Amendment Instructions Table

l)


Name of Local Government Area: City of Salisbury

Name of Development Plan: Salisbury (City) Development Plan

Name of DPA: Mawson Lakes Development Plan Amendment

The following amendment instructions (at the time of drafting) relate to the City of Salisbury

Development Plan consolidated on 20 March 2014.

Where amendments to this Development Plan have been authorised after the aforementioned

consolidation date, consequential changes to the following amendment instructions will be made as

necessary to give effect to this amendment.

Am

en

dm

en

t In

stru

ctio

n N

um

be

r

Method of

Change

Replace

Delete

Insert

Detail what is to be replaced or

deleted or detail where new

policy is to be inserted.

Objective (Obj)

Principle of Development

Control (PDC)

Desired Character Statement

(DCS)

Map/Table No.

Other (Specify)

Detail what material is to be

inserted (if applicable, i.e., use for

Insert or Replace methods of

change only).

Is R

en

um

be

rin

g re

qu

ire

d (

Y/N

)

Subsequent

Policy cross-

references

requiring

update

(Y/N) if yes

please specify.

COUNCIL WIDE / GENERAL SECTION PROVISIONS (including figures and illustrations contained in the

text)

Amendments required (Yes/No): No

ZONE AND/OR POLICY AREA AND/OR PRECINCT PROVISIONS (including figures and illustrations

contained in the text)


City of Salisbury


k) 4

Amendments required (Yes/No): Yes

MFP (The Levels) Zone

1. Delete All No

Mawson Lakes Policy Area

2. Insert Within the Residential Zone,

immediately after Salisbury

Residential Policy Area 18

All of Attachment A No

Urban Core Zone

3. Insert Immediately after the Rural

Living Zone

All of Attachment B No

Infrastructure Policy Area

4. Insert Immediately after PDC 4 in

the Industry Zone,

Infrastructure Policy Area 9

All of Attachment C No

5.

TABLES

Amendments required (Yes/No): No

MAPPING (Structure Plans, Overlays, Enlargements, Zone Maps, Policy Area & Precinct Maps)

Amendments required (Yes/No): "Insert Yes or No"

Map Reference Table

6. Replace Map Reference Table All of Attachment D

Map(s)

7. Replace Concept Plan Map Sal/8

Mawson Lakes

Attachment E No

8. Replace Zone Maps 39, 40, 46, 48,

53

Attachment F

9. Replace Policy Area Maps 39, 40, 46,

47, 48, 53

Attachment G

10. Insert New Policy Area Map 40 Attachment H


City of Salisbury


l)

11. Insert New Concept Plan Sal/30

Mawson Lakes Car Parking

Fund

Attachment I

k) 6

Attachment A


City of Salisbury

Attachment A

m) 7

MAWSON LAKES POLICY AREA

Refer to the Map Reference Tables for a list of the maps that relate to this Policy Area.

OBJECTIVES

1. A residential Policy Area comprising a range of low and medium-density dwellings, including a minimum of 15 per cent affordable housing, designed to integrate with areas of open space, neighbouring centres or public transport nodes.

2. Development that minimises the potential impact of garaging of vehicles on the character of the area.

3. Development that supports the viability of community services and infrastructure and reflects good residential design principles.

4. Development that contributes to the desired character of the policy area

5. Development that meets accepted best practice principles in environmental design.

6. Development that is compatible with existing and forecast noise nuisance from aircraft operations at Parafield Airport.

DESIRED CHARACTER

The Mawson Lakes Policy Area will primarily comprise of low-rise (1-3 storeys) dwellings,

generally of a low density nature, but with areas of medium density forms of housing. The Policy

Area will be developed with cost-effective and energy-efficient forms of housing, efficient layouts,

allotment sizes and shapes, and road widths, efficient use of sites and nodes of medium density housing.

k) 8

Medium density forms of housing, including detached dwellings designed for small allotments (e.g.

courtyard dwellings), semi-detached dwellings, row dwellings, residential flat buildings and group dwellings

will be encouraged in areas with good access to essential services, with concentrated nodes of medium

density development (3- 4 storeys) close to centres and shops, public transport or major employment

nodes or adjacent to areas of public open space.

Development will provide pleasant streetscapes, landscaping and local open spaces, with quality

fencing. Residential development, particularly medium density dwellings, will be designed to

minimise the impact of garaging and driveway crossovers on the streetscape. All development

accommodating living and employment activities will be designed and insulated to minimise effects

of predicted aircraft noise, and adjacent activities when located next to industrial zones.

Water Sensitive Urban Design systems, including the harvest, treatment, storage and reuse of

storm water, will be integrated throughout the area at the neighbourhood, street, site and building

level. Harvested storm water will improve the aesthetic and functional value of open spaces,

including public access ways and greenways. Properties will be expected to be connected to the

purple pipe water recycling system. .

PRINCIPLES OF DEVELOPMENT CONTROL

Land Use

1. The following forms of development are envisaged in the Policy Area:

affordable housing

domestic outbuilding in association with a dwelling

domestic structure

dwelling

dwelling addition

residential flat building (up to 4 storeys)

small scale non-residential use that serves the local community, for example:

child care facility

health and welfare service

open space

primary and secondary school


City of Salisbury

Attachment A

m) 9

recreation area

shop, office or consulting room

supported accommodation.

Form and Character

2. Low density residential development should:

a) achieve a net density of less than 35 dwelling units per hectare

b) be of a low rise form of 1-3 storeys.

3. Medium density residential development should:

a) achieve a net density of 35-70 dwelling units per hectare

b) be of a low/medium rise form of 3- 4 storeys.

4. Upper level balconies may extend 1 metre closer to the road boundary than the associated dwelling.

5. In the case of multiple dwellings on one site, access to parking and garaging areas from public streets should primarily be via a minimum number of common driveways.

Fencing

6. Fencing should not be a dominant feature in the streetscape.

7. Fencing for non-residential development should:

a) not occur along front property boundaries of commercial premises

b) be up to 2.4 metres in height for side and rear fences where required for security purposes

k) 10

c) be of quality materials that match the building, or be high quality painted steel railings where visible from the main and/or secondary street.

8. If to be provided, fencing:

a) may be located on front, side and rear boundaries where the building does not sit on the boundary

b) should be 1.2 – 1.8 metres in height at the front and 1.8 – 2.0 metres at the rear and side (behind the dwelling facade)

c) should match the residential building materials, style and colour

d) should preferably be of brick, render, stone or steel railing or feature panels.

9. If to be provided, fencing to reserve areas should be of quality materials of an open style that match the building in materials and design.

10. Privacy fencing, if required, should be set back from a reserve boundary.

11. Fencing to side and rear boundaries to residential development may be of colorbond where the fence is:

a) located behind the building line

b) not on a secondary street frontage.

Ancillary Buildings and Services

12. Ancillary buildings should comprise the same or similar style, materials, design and general form as the main building on the site.

13. All services should be supplied underground.

14. Microwave dishes, antennae, aerials and the like should, where practicable, be located to minimise their visual impact from public roads and public spaces.

15. Communication towers should, where practicable, be incorporated into the built form of the site and be of a complementary form to that building.


City of Salisbury

Attachment A

m) 11

16. Communication towers, where unable to be satisfactorily incorporated into the built form of the site, should be located at the rear of sites and away from public roads and public spaces.

17. Buildings should:

a) have provision for voice, data and video links

b) have service ducts in multi-tenant buildings to enable tenancy flexibility

c) be pre-wired

d) in the case of residential development have Home Management Systems

e) in the case of non-residential buildings have Building Management Systems.

18. Development should include provision of a:

a) connection to the Recycled Water System with the water used for various uses, including garden watering and toilet flushing

b) common service trench accommodating the various infrastructure services required, including electricity, gas and telecommunications

c) common service meter box accommodating the various utility service meters required

d) crossover (the area between the footpath and the kerb) that is constructed in the same material and design as the footpath.

k) 12

Mary Dan Policy Area (Policy area 34 maps 74, 76)

MARY DAN POLICY AREA

1. A residential Policy Area comprising a range of low and medium-density dwellings, including a minimum of 15 per cent affordable housing, designed to integrate with areas of open space, neighbouring centres or public transport nodes.

2. Development that recognises required additional acoustic treatments to maintain a quality living environment.

3. Development that minimises the potential impact of garaging of vehicles on the character of the area.

4. Development that supports the viability of community services and infrastructure and reflects good residential design principles.

5. Development that contributes to the desired character of the policy area


7. Development that is compatible with existing and forecast noise nuisance from aircraft operations at Parafield Airport.

DESIRED CHARACTER

The Mary Dan Policy Area is located in the south-eastern corner of Mawson Lakes and is part of the

Residential Zone. The area has been established with industrial activities for some years and has a low

amenity that has not enhanced Mawson Lakes during its development, and is inconsistent with the

Mawson Lakes standards.

The Policy Area is a gateway to Mawson Lakes, being on the corner of Main North Road and Montague

Road. Development which results in an improvement to the amenity of the area will be required. This will

be achieved in the short term in order to comply with the Environment Protection (Noise) legislation by


City of Salisbury

Attachment A

m) 13

having higher requirements and standards apply to the existing non residential activities, including for such

matters as the screening of operational and storage areas by landscaping and fencing. In the longer term,

the transition to residential uses is desired. The Policy Area is a prime location for residential uses,

providing opportunities to develop housing along the Dry Creek Linear Park which is a significant public

recreational asset and provides a pedestrian and bicycle link through Mawson Lakes.

Medium density forms of housing including semi-detached dwellings, row dwellings, residential flat

buildings and group dwellings are encouraged and are to be developed in a coordinated and orderly

manner. Development will be of a form and scale compatible with the adjoining residential development.

As part of the increase in residential density there will be an increase in the number of dwellings of two or

more storeys. Such development will recognise the proximity of adjoining development and will be

designed and sited to maintain the privacy of adjoining dwellings and their private open space areas, and

will be designed to integrate with the existing built form. Buildings will be designed to maximise solar

access within the development site. Installation of solar rooftops, green walls and other design initiatives is

to be considered.

Co-ordinated and efficient development of larger sites containing multiple allotments is encouraged in

order to achieve greater housing density and diversity. Development proposals for this Policy Area will be

required to demonstrate that appropriate site contamination assessment has been undertaken and that,

where necessary, the site has been remediated to ensure that it is suitable and safe for the proposed

use.

A long time unused cemetery site exists in an unknown location within the Policy Area.

Development will be required to undertake site investigations.





purple pipe water recycling system.

k) 14


Land Use


affordable housing

domestic outbuilding in association with a dwelling

domestic structure

dwelling

dwelling addition

residential flat building (up to 4 storeys)

small scale non-residential use that serves the local community, for example:

child care facility

health and welfare service

open space

primary and secondary school

recreation area

shop, office or consulting room

supported accommodation.

2. Existing industrial and transport activities located in the Mary Dan Policy Area should only expand where adverse impacts on adjoining uses are reduced as a result of the expansion.

3. Residential development adjacent to non-residential zones and land uses should be located, designed and/or sited to protect residents from potential adverse impacts from non-residential activities.

4. Sensitive uses likely to conflict with the continuation of lawfully existing developments and land uses considered appropriate for the zone should be designed to minimise negative impacts.


City of Salisbury

Attachment A

m) 15

Form and Character

5. Low density residential development should:

c) achieve a net density of less than 35 dwelling units per hectare

d) be of a low rise form of 1-3 storeys.

6. Medium density residential development should:

c) achieve a net density of 35-70 dwelling units per hectare

d) be of a low/medium rise form of 3- 4 storeys.

7. Upper level balconies may extend 1 metre closer to the road boundary than the associated dwelling.

8. In the case of multiple dwellings on one site, access to parking and garaging areas from public streets should primarily be via a minimum number of common driveways.

Noise

9. Development should be designed, sited and operated to meet current Environment Protection (Noise) Policy requirements.

10. Buildings should be constructed of materials providing appropriate acoustic properties to minimise the transmission of noise to adjacent premises and properties.

11. Industrial and commercial building facades facing land used for residential purposes should not contain openings or entrance ways that would result in the transmission of noise that would adversely affect the residential amenity.

k) 16

12. Any plant, equipment or operations with potential to cause an environmental nuisance (including a chimney stack or air conditioning plant) should be:

a) sited as far as possible from adjoining non-industrially zoned allotments

b) designed and operated to minimise its effect on the amenity of the locality.

13. Development should be sited, designed and constructed to minimise negative impacts of noise and to avoid unreasonable interference.

14. Development should be consistent with the relevant provisions in the current Environment Protection (Noise) Policy.

15. Development in areas which adjoin industrial land uses and areas affected by aircraft noise should be designed, sited and constructed to minimise the effects of noise.

Environmental Matters

16. Development including land division, should not occur unless the potential for site contamination has been assessed and the site remediated as necessary to ensure that it is suitable and safe for the proposed use.

17. Development should not generate odours with impact beyond the boundaries of the site.

18. Waste storage and recycling areas should be:

a) screened from public view

b) easily accessible for solid waste collection

c) be located to minimise impacts on residential uses

d) of a size appropriate to the amount of waste to be generated.

19. Development should not result in light overspill to adjoining properties.

Fencing




City of Salisbury

Attachment A

m) 17

d) not occur along front property boundaries of commercial premises

e) be up to 2.4 metres in height for side and rear fences where required for security purposes

f) be of quality materials that match the building, or be high quality painted steel railings where visible from the main and/or secondary street.

21. If to be provided, fencing:

e) may be located on front, side and rear boundaries where the building does not sit on the boundary

f) should be 1.2 – 1.8 metres in height at the front and 1.8 – 2.0 metres at the rear and side (behind the dwelling facade)

g) should match the residential building materials, style and colour

h) should preferably be of brick, render, stone or steel railing or feature panels.

22. If to be provided, fencing to reserve areas should be of quality materials of an open style that match the building in materials and design.


24. Fencing to side and rear boundaries to residential development may be of colorbond where the fence is:

c) located behind the building line

d) not on a secondary street frontage.





k) 18




f) have provision for voice, data and video links

g) have service ducts in multi-tenant buildings to enable tenancy flexibility

h) be pre-wired

i) in the case of residential development have Home Management Systems

j) in the case of non-residential buildings have Building Management Systems.


e) connection to the Recycled Water System with the water used for various uses, including garden watering and toilet flushing

f) common service trench accommodating the various infrastructure services required, including electricity, gas and telecommunications

g) common service meter box accommodating the various utility service meters required

h) crossover (the area between the footpath and the kerb) that is constructed in the same material and design as the footpath.


City of Salisbury

Attachment B

m) 19

Attachment B

k) 20

MAWSON LAKES URBAN CORE ZONE

Urban Core Zone

Refer to the Map Reference Tables for a list of the maps that relate to this zone.

OBJECTIVES

1. A mixed use zone accommodating a mix of employment generating land uses and medium to high density residential development in close proximity to a high frequency public transport corridor.

2. Development within a mixed use environment that is compatible with surrounding development and which does not unreasonably compromise the amenity of the zone or any adjoining residential zone.

3. Smaller dwellings, including innovative housing designs, located close to local services and public transport stops.

4. Mixed use development integrated with a high quality public realm that promotes walking, cycling, public transport patronage and positive social interaction.

5. A zone that provides a spatial separation, or transitions down, in scale and intensity to adjacent lower density residential zones.

6. Development that contributes to the desired character of the zone.

7. Development that is compatible with existing and forecast noise nuisance from aircraft operations at

Parafield Airport.


City of Salisbury

Attachment B

m) 21

DESIRED CHARACTER

This zone functions as a District Centre and supports housing at medium and high densities and a

range of dwelling types which are conveniently located in proximity to high frequency public

transport services, recreation, commercial, shop, office and other mixed use activities.

Development within this zone will result in significant employment generating activity closely

aligned to nearby public transport infrastructure and services.

Medium and high density housing, primarily in the form of row dwellings, residential flat buildings

and mixed use buildings, will be developed in the zone. Overall, the zone is intended to achieve an

average net residential site density of 150 dwellings per hectare.

Due to the scale and intensity of development, the zone will focus around a Core Area with a

Transition Area adjoining neighbouring zones.

The Core Area will provide the greatest intensity of land use and activity in the zone with a mix of

residential, commercial and employment generating activities integrated with adjacent public transit

stop(s). Located within the Core Area is the Main Shopping Policy Area, which will provide the

primary focus for convenience shopping, including supermarkets, and cultural and community

services in the zone.

Development adjacent to a fixed transit stop will be mixed both vertically and horizontally, with non-

residential uses encouraged on the ground floor to create visual interest and invite personal

interaction on street frontages. The exterior storage or display of goods will not compromise

pedestrian movement.

Student and aged accommodation, serviced apartments and affordable housing are also strongly

encouraged in the Core Area to assist in delivering an overall mix of residential activity in this area.

The Transition Area will provide a buffer between the Core Area and adjacent residential

areas/zones with development taking the form of high quality medium density housing and, subject

to Airport building height restrictions, the combination of four storey townhouses/terraces/mews

and residential flat buildings will provide a range of housing for a diverse community. There will be

some provision for mixed use buildings, where it does not negatively impact on the predominant

residential character of the area.

k) 22

Development in the zone will achieve high quality urban design. Buildings will contribute to the

provision of a coherent public realm by shaping the street space and, in particular, the physical and

functional character of development fronting the key arterial road or public transport corridor.

As development intensifies, overlooking, overshadowing and noise impacts will be moderated

through good design and noise attenuation techniques. Impacts on adjoining zones will also be

addressed through appropriate building envelopes, transition of building heights, design and

location of windows and balconies, and use of landscaping. Buildings will also be designed to

maximise solar access within the development site. Installation of solar rooftops, green walls and

other design initiatives is to be considered.

Development will contribute positively to the quality of the public realm by articulating buildings with

canopies, modelled façades and balconies that make use of light and shade, and by providing

architectural detail. Solid material will be balanced with glazed areas, and plant and service

equipment will be enclosed and out of view from the street and neighbouring sites.

A proportion of the public open space will be sited away from the transit corridor to ensure that

residents and workers have a quiet tranquil outdoor place to relax in.

Where appropriate, the range of setbacks provided in the zone to accommodate development

fronting a primary and/or secondary road frontage will be critical in softening the continuous edge

of new built form and provide a higher amenity streetscape and pedestrian environment which is

shaded by street trees and other forms of mature vegetation.

Where appropriate, landscaping features including public art will be used in communal open space

or public promenades to punctuate and identify spaces that may assist in establishing a sense of

place within the zone for the enjoyment and benefit of users.

Wide footpaths with associated landscaping will be provided throughout the zone to encourage the

development of active land uses at street level along key thoroughfares. Landscaping features,

including public art, will be used to create high amenity spaces that establish a sense of place

within the zone and promote community cohesion.

Cycling routes and pedestrian pathways, and high amenity public open space will create an

attractive living environment. Public open space will include a range of forms and sizes including

small pocket parks and formal plazas. Spaces will be designed as safe and attractive places for a

range of community activities as well as water management. A proportion of the public open space

will be sited away from the transit corridor to ensure that residents and workers have a quiet

tranquil outdoor place to relax in.


City of Salisbury

Attachment B

m) 23

On-site parking areas will be consolidated, shared and, where possible, not visible from the street

or public spaces. Provision of bicycle facilities is to be encouraged, including at any future multi-

deck car park at the Interchange.





purple pipe water recycling system.

The Mawson Interchange provides integrated bus and passenger train interconnection, provides a

drop off area for commuters and Park ‘n’ Ride facilities with car parking. As development in the

area continues the Interchange is expected to become busier. Development in the immediate

vicinity of the Interchange will cater for the users of the Interchange while development overall will

enhance the usage of the Interchange. The ground level car parking at the Interchange should

become a future multi-deck car park with commercial and retail ground floor tenancies to improve

the pedestrian linkages and activation.


Land Use

1. The following types of development, or combination thereof, are envisaged in the zone:

affordable housing

aged persons accommodation

art gallery

community centre

communication dish

consulting room

dwelling

dwelling and office

k) 24

educational establishment

emergency services

Entertainment venue

hall

hospital

library

licensed premises

nursing home

office

office and dwelling

Parking facility

Petrol Filling Station

pre-school

Public Transport Interchange

Recreation area

research and development

residential flat building

retirement village

shop or group of shops

supported accommodation

Swimming pool

telecommunications facility

theatre

under croft car parking

2. The following additional types of development, or combination thereof, are envisaged within the

Core Area of the zone, identified on Concept Plan Figure UC/1:

advertisement

discount department store (in the Main Shopping Policy Area)

hotel

indoor recreation centre


City of Salisbury

Attachment B

m) 25

place of worship

tourist accommodation.

supermarket (in the Main Shopping Policy Area)

3. Development listed as non-complying is generally inappropriate.

4. Core Areas, Transition Areas and other identified features should be developed in accordance with the relevant Concept Plan Figure UC/1.

5. Core Areas should be developed to include a range of land uses that are high pedestrian generators, directly promote public transport use and provide opportunities for multi-purpose trips.

6. Core Areas should incorporate integrated public open spaces, sport and recreation facilities, and community areas that act as social hubs for communal activity.

7. Except in Core Areas where a higher intensity of development is envisaged, non-residential development should comprise uses that:

(a) are of local or neighbourhood scale

(b) encourage walking to local shopping, community services and other activities

(c) do not detrimentally impact on the amenity of nearby residents.

Form and Character

8. Development should be consistent with the desired character for the zone.

9. Residential development (other than residential development in mixed use buildings), should achieve a minimum net residential site density in accordance with the following:

k) 26

Designated area Minimum net residential site density

Core Area 150 dwellings per hectare net

Transition Area 70 dwellings per hectare net

10. Residential development in a mixed use building should achieve a minimum net residential site density of 60 dwellings per hectare.

11. In Transition Areas, development should provide a built form that provides the transition between an intense core of development and neighbouring lower intensity development.

Design and Appearance

12. In Core Areas:

(a) the ground and first floors of buildings should be built to dimensions including a minimum

ceiling height of 4.5 metres to allow for adaptation to a range of land uses including shops,

office and residential without the need for significant change to the building

(b) a minimum of 50 per cent of the ground floor primary frontage of buildings should be

visually

permeable, transparent or clear glazed to promote active street frontages and maximise

passive surveillance.

13. Except in Core Areas, development of three or more storeys in height should ensure that:

(a) north-facing windows to habitable rooms of existing dwelling(s) on the same allotment, and

on adjacent allotments, receive at least 3 hours of direct sunlight over a portion of their

surface between 9.00 am and 3.00 pm on 21 June

(b) ground level open space of existing buildings receives direct sunlight for a minimum of 2

hours between 9.00 am and 3.00 pm on 21 June to at least the smaller of the following:


City of Salisbury

Attachment B

m) 27

(i) half of the existing ground level open space

(ii) 35 square metres of the existing ground level open space (with at least one of the

area’s dimensions measuring 2.5 metres).

14. Buildings should address public open space and defined pedestrian and cycle routes.

15. Masonry fences should be no more than 1.2 metres in height to maintain sight lines between

buildings and the street and to improve safety through passive surveillance.

16. Buildings should predominantly provide vehicle access via a side street or rear lane access way.

17. Side streets and rear lane access ways should be designed to:

(a) provide space between buildings that reduces building mass and creates a more interesting

public realm

(b) achieve active frontages at a lower intensity than the primary street frontage.

Fencing



a) not occur along front property boundaries of commercial premises

b) be up to 2.4 metres in height for side and rear fences where required for security purposes

c) be of quality materials that match the building or of black plastic coated open wire style.

k) 28

20. If to be provided for serviced apartments, student housing and SOHO housing, fencing:

a) may be located on front, side and rear boundaries where the building does not sit on the boundary

b) should be 1.2 – 1.8 metres in height at the front and 1.8 – 2.0 metres at the rear and side (behind the dwelling facade)

c) should match the residential building materials, style and colour

d) should preferably be of brick, render, stone or steel railing or feature panels.

21. Fencing to reserve areas should be of an open style or not provided at all.









a) have provision for voice, data and video links

b) have service ducts in multi-tenant buildings to enable tenancy flexibility


City of Salisbury

Attachment B

m) 29

c) be pre-wired

d) in the case of residential development have Home Management Systems

e) in the case of non-residential buildings have Building Management Systems.


a) connection to the Recycled Water System with the water used for various uses, including garden watering and toilet flushing

b) common service trench accommodating the various infrastructure services required, including electricity, gas and telecommunications

c) common service meter box accommodating the various utility service meters required

d) Home Management System or a minimum 1 kw Solar Photovoltaic Package for residential development or a Business Management System for non-residential development

e) crossover (the area between the footpath and the kerb) that is constructed in the same material and design as the footpath.

Building Envelope

Building Height

30. Except where airport building height restrictions prevail, building heights (excluding any rooftop locate mechanical plant or equipment) should be consistent with the following parameters:

k) 30

Designated area Minimum building height Maximum building height

Core Area 4 storeys 10 storeys and up to 40.5

metres

Transition Area 2 storeys 4 storeys and up to 16.5 metres

Setbacks from the Primary Road Frontage

31. Buildings (excluding verandas, porticos and the like) should be set back from the primary road frontage in accordance with the following parameters:

Designated area Minimum setback from the primary road frontage

Core Area No minimum

Transition Area 2 metres or as defined on the relevant Concept

Plan

Setbacks from side boundaries

32. Buildings (excluding verandas, porticos and the like) should be set back from side boundaries in accordance with the following parameters:

Designated area Minimum setback from side boundaries

Core Area No minimum

Transition Area 0.9 metres


City of Salisbury

Attachment B

m) 31

Other Setbacks

33. Buildings (excluding verandas, porticos and the like) should be set back in accordance with the following parameters:

Setback parameter Value

Minimum setback from secondary

road frontage

0.9 metres

Minimum setback from a rear access

way

No minimum where the access way is 6.5 metres

or

more

OR

Where the access way is less than 6.5 metres in

width, the distance equal to the additional width

required to make the access way 6.5 metres or

more, to provide adequate manoeuvrability for

vehicles

Minimum setback from the rear

allotment boundary

4 metres where the subject land directly abuts an

allotment of a different zone

3 metres in all other cases, except where

development abuts the wall of an existing or

simultaneously constructed building on the

adjoining land

k) 32

Incentives

34. Where a minimum of 3 hours sunlight access on 21 June to habitable rooms and open space of dwellings in adjoining zones can be maintained, the following incentives apply to development:

Form of development Additional building height above

maximum allowed height in the

zone

Car parking

Reduction (rounded to the

nearest whole number)

Development which

includes more than 15 per

cent of dwellings as

affordable housing

1 storey 30 per cent

Site of development

located within 200 metres

of a fixed public transport

stop

30 per cent

The development includes

under croft parking with

access from a road

located to the side or rear

of the site

1 storey 10 per cent

A building including non-

residential development

on the ground floor (or

first two floors) with

residential development

on the floors above

1 storey 10 per cent except on land

shown on Overlay Map(s) -

Strategic Transport

Routes

A building including a

child care facility

1 storey

A building including a

rooftop garden that

occupies a minimum 25

1 storey


City of Salisbury

Attachment B

m) 33

Form of development Additional building height above

maximum allowed height in the

zone

Car parking

Reduction (rounded to the

nearest whole number)

per cent of the building

footprint

area

Sympathetic

redevelopment of a local

or State heritage place

that retains the item and

its appearance to the

street

30 per cent

Maximum accumulated

allowance

For buildings 5 storeys or less - 1

storey (and less than 4) metres

additional building

height

For buildings of 6 storeys or

more - 2 storeys (and less than 8

metres) additional building

height

30 per cent

Off Street Vehicle Parking

35. Except where incentives apply, vehicle parking should be provided at the following rates:

a) for residential development, 0.75 parking spaces per dwelling

b) for shops, 3 parking spaces per 100 square metres of gross leasable floor area

k) 34

c) for tourist accommodation, 1 space for every 4 bedrooms up to 100 bedrooms and 1 space for every 5 bedrooms over 100 bedrooms

d) all other non-residential uses, 3 parking spaces per 100 square metres of gross leasable floor area at ground floor level and 1.5 parking spaces per 100 square metres of gross leasable floor area above ground floor level.

36. A lesser parking rate may be applied where justified based on local circumstances, for example where:

(a) the proposed development is adjacent to a designated pedestrian and/or cycling path

(b) the proposed development is in convenient walking distance to readily accessible and frequent

public transport

(c) convenient on-street car parking is readily available

(d) the proposed development is on or adjacent to the site of a heritage place which hinders the

provision of on-site parking

(e) there is the opportunity to exploit shared car parking areas between uses based upon compatible

hours of peak operation

(f) suitable arrangements are made for any parking shortfall to be met elsewhere or by other means

(g) for studio apartments, student accommodation, affordable housing, retirement villages or aged

persons’ accommodation.

37. Car parking at basement level, under croft parking or multi-level parking should be provided rather than ‘at grade’.

38. Multi-deck car parks should take the appearance of a commercial building.


City of Salisbury

Attachment B

m) 35

Land Division

39. A traditional street grid pattern should be reinforced in any comprehensive development of areas for mixed use activity to maintain clear sightlines and ensure maximum connectivity.

40. Wherever practicable, land division and site amalgamation should:

(a) create allotments that vary in size and are suitable for a variety of residential and

commercial uses

(b) improve the level of integration associated with the design and layout of buildings, vehicle

parking areas, access points and landscaping treatments.

k) 36

Mawson Innovation Policy Area 33

OBJECTIVES

1. A Policy Area catering for a quality education and business community of innovative, high technology organisations, including in the defence and aerospace, advanced electronics and information communication technology sectors.

2. Provision of facilities to accommodate a range of organisations, including global organisations, established small and medium enterprises and one person start-up companies.


4. The continued use, or adaptive re-use of State heritage places that supports the conservation of their cultural significance.

5. Development that contributes to the desired character of the Policy Area.

DESIRED CHARACTER

The Mawson Innovation Policy Area provides opportunities to bring together the innovation,

technology knowledge, and research and development resources of Technology Park, University

of South Australia, and Mawson Lakes for business and research collaboration.

The Mawson Innovation Policy Area will provide facilities for technology businesses with an

emphasis on the commercialisation of new technology and achieving sustainable growth in

technology employment within Mawson Lakes. It will provide flexibility for technology businesses

that want to grow and offer a range of accommodation solutions to suit businesses of any size,

including short term serviced offices, long term leased accommodation and fully serviced

commercial land with flexible allotment sizes. There will be opportunities for limited residential uses

of a higher density within the Technology Park area, particularly along the river front, and

maintenance of the park like setting.

Buildings will be of a form to accommodate information and communication technologies, software

design and development, wireless systems, satellite and mobile communications, sensor signals

and information processing, environmental and materials technologies, defence and aerospace

technologies, education and health technologies and associated support services. Buildings will be

located in landscaped settings, with staff car parking, service access, storage areas and external


City of Salisbury

Attachment B

m) 37

operations located to the rear of buildings. Visitor parking will be conveniently located adjacent to

the main entrance to buildings. Under croft car-parking is envisioned.

Development of the State listed heritage places (Former Levels Homestead and the Former Levels

Homestead Stables) in the Policy Area will provide for their continued use or adaptive re-use, in a

manner that supports the conservation of their cultural significance. Adjacent development will

conserve the setting of these State heritage places.

Development will have regard to the Parafield Airport operational requirements for matters such as

building height restrictions, and airplane noise, operational airspace intrusion, wildlife strike

management and lighting.

The Mawson Lakes campus of the University of South Australia will continue to provide a base for

the University’s computing and information technology, engineering, science, civil aviation, applied

science, sports science, e-commerce and environmental studies programs. It also houses many

internationally and nationally recognised research institutes and centres. The campus enjoys state-

of-the-art research facilities, an extensive library and collaborative links with nearby Technology

Park Adelaide. The Mawson Centre building provides a shared space for the campus and the

Mawson Lakes community, containing a library, lecture theatre and computer barn. Increased

pedestrian and vehicular traffic to the campus will continue from the north-west, from a

combination of higher residential densities, proximity to the railway station and bus interchange

and access from Elder Smith Road. Development of the campus will recognise these influences.

The existing building stock on the campus is principally rectilinear in nature, of two to three storeys

in height and with flat roofs. They create a series of courtyards and avenues, vistas and views.

This form of development will generally be continued for infill development, capitalising on the

existing precedent. However, a contrast in building form is appropriate at strategic sites around the

campus and at the three main entry points of the campus, in the south-east, south-west and north-

west corners. Developments at the interface with the Core Area of the Urban Core Zone will

respond to their individual contexts.

The Endeavour College campus will continue its educational activities with provision for community

uses. Built form will be consistent in style with the main building.

All development will be of high quality architectural design and build, and designed, sited,

constructed and operated to meet contemporary water and energy efficiency requirements.

k) 38


Form and Character

1. Mixed use developments should be:

a) compatible in nature

b) complementary in design

c) complementary in operation and management practices.

2. Development in the Mawson Innovation Policy Area should comprise:

a) small to medium enterprises and small corporate users

b) associated support services

c) limited residential uses.

d) Educational uses

3. Development in the Mawson Innovation Policy Area should provide:

a) a highly articulated building form, with a range of roof forms, including flat, pitched or curved roof shapes

b) vertical and horizontal articulation at appropriate intervals

c) variation in facades by the use of such means as balconies, porticos, verandahs and minor variations in building lines to create shadow lines

d) pedestrian shelter along major pedestrian routes

e) a continuous building form to the street frontage

f) a wide range of materials and finishes

g) legible entry points for both commercial and residential activities

h) orientation to public roads and/or public spaces.


City of Salisbury

Attachment B

m) 39

4. Residential development in the Mawson Innovation Policy Area should:

a) provide for small offices/home offices (SOHOs) in the form of a combination of a small office/small scaled business or research activities with a dwelling

b) be located adjacent to the lake and/or the alignment of Dry Creek

c) be designed to integrate with the commercial environment in which it is located, utilising contemporary design solutions of glass, steel, aluminium, concrete, fibre-cement and synthetic materials.

5. The non-residential component of SOHOs should:

a) not adversely impact on the residential component

b) be larger than 30 square metres but less than 100 square metres

c) comprise at least 30 percent of each unit and be permanently used for acceptable activities.

University of South Australia’s Mawson Lakes campus

6. Development of the campus as a pre-eminent tertiary institution particularly in the fields of information technology, engineering environment and education.

7. Integration of the campus with development in the adjoining Mawson Central Policy Area and surrounding facilities.

8. Improvement of the open space amenity of the campus.

9. Enhanced environmental conditions and sustainability of the campus.

10. Improved access, orientation and parking for regular campus users and visitors.

11. Development of integrated recreational areas and facilities that accommodate a range of activities accessible to the community.

k) 40


Runway Public Safety Policy Area 36

OBJECTIVES

1. Development that ensures the long-term operational and safety aviation requirements of Parafield Airport.

2. A Policy Area accommodating sporting, entertainment, cultural and recreational activities and associated spectator and administrative facilities.

3. Development of integrated recreational areas and facilities that accommodate a range of activities accessible to the community.

4. Buildings, facilities and car parks located and designed to blend in with existing or additional trees, vegetation and landscaping.


DESIRED CHARACTER

The Runway Public Safety Policy Area is located on the eastern side of the University campus and

extends to Main North Road. While identified in a separate Policy Area to the built form in the

Mawson Innovation Policy Area, the activities undertaken in this Policy Area are an integral part of

University life and a blurring of activities at the interface of the two Policy Areas is envisaged, but

that has regard to the operational requirements of Parafield Airport.

The focus of this eastern side of the campus will be on providing a landscaped outlook (both

natural and more formal), in contrast to the urban outlooks to the south and west. The open space

will be used for passive recreation, active recreation and educational purposes. Playing fields and

the golf course will continue to be developed.


City of Salisbury

Attachment B

m) 41

Enhancement of the wetlands will continue in combination with unstructured group planting. Long

and short walking paths will be provided through the Policy Area for both recreational and

educational purposes. Paths will be provided to the waters’ edge, along with hides for observing

birdlife and boardwalks over the water for collecting water and marine samples.

Any built development within the Policy Area will be in association with the recreational or

educational activities desired in the Policy Area, although some buildings for community use may

be appropriate adjacent to the Policy Area. All development will be designed, sited, constructed

and operated to meet contemporary water and energy efficiency requirements.

Development in the policy area will require special attention to ensure that land use conflicts with the

nearby Parafield Airport are minimised.


Land Use


car parking

clubroom associated with a sports facility

golf course

lighting for night use of facilities

office associated with community or recreation facility

playground

sports ground and associated facility

special event

spectator and administrative facilities ancillary to recreation development

k) 42

Form and Character

2. Development should not be undertaken unless it is consistent with the desired character for the Policy Area.

3. Development in the Policy Area should:

a) provide a landscaped outlook

b) provide long and short walking paths to the wetlands

c) be primarily for passive recreation, active recreation and educational purposes.

4. Development that involves the assembly or concentration of large numbers of people in locations

where there is a significant risk to public health or safety should not occur within the policy area.

5. Development should restrict the level of lighting to ensure it complies with the Australian Defence

Force Publication - 602 Part 5 Chapter 7 and the Civil Aviation Safety Authority Manual of Standards

Part 139 Aerodromes Section 9.21.

6. Lights with no upward light component (eg aero screen type designs) should be utilised to minimise the

potential conflict with aircraft operations.

7. Development (including roofs) should either be constructed in materials of non-reflective textures or

colours that blend with the natural environment and avoid light glare.

8. Development within the Public Safety Area as shown on Policy Area Map Sal/75 should not:

(a) contain any buildings, unless it is a clubroom or similar building for sport activities, or associated

buildings

(b) result in a significant increase in the number of people working or congregating in that area

(c) involve the use or storage of hazardous materials.


City of Salisbury

Attachment B

m) 43

Main Shopping Policy Area 35

OBJECTIVES

1. The Policy Area should be developed as the retail core and be comprised of the primary retail development within the district centre.

2. An integrated, modern centre design with human scale developed in stages

3. Additional development in the precinct should be integrated with, and form a logical extension of, the existing shopping complex

4. Landscaping and planting should include the use of native trees, shrubs and ground cover and should complement the overall landscaping of the Policy Area.


DESIRED CHARACTER

This policy area within the District Centre will encourage the development of a destination that attracts

people to its combination of and variety of retail uses such as supermarkets, discount department stores

and associated retail uses. Ground floor uses will be primarily shops, offices and consulting rooms, and with

residential uses above the ground floor. District scale retail activity is envisaged within the Policy Area,

Buildings will provide visual interest to the pedestrian, contain frequent pedestrian entries and clear

windows to the street. Buildings will establish a width, rhythm and pattern of façades that support a variety

of tenancies with narrow footprints, while building height will increase. Buildings will be built with zero set

back from the main street, with the occasional section of building set back to create outdoor dining areas,

visually interesting building entrances and intimate but active spaces. Under croft car parking or semi

basement car parking should not have an imposing impact on the street and footpath. The footpath will be

sheltered with verandas, shelters and the like to enhance the pedestrian experience.

k) 44

Safe, landscaped pedestrian walkways between buildings will encourage permeability to neighbouring

streets and enhance the sense of place and identity of the policy area. Vehicle access will be grouped. On

the footpath and at the front façade of developments, landscaping will be small scale or vertical, such as

through the use of creepers and green walls and in planter boxes on the footpath. Street trees will be

provided between parking spaces on the street.


Land Use

1 The following forms of development are envisaged in the policy area:

▪ bulky goods outlet

▪ consulting room

▪ Discount department store

▪ health facility

▪ hotel

▪ library

▪ office

▪ place of worship

▪ restaurant

▪ shop

▪ supermarket.

2 Development should be consistent with the desired character for the policy area.

3. Development on the ground floor of buildings should be non-residential.

Form and Character

4. Development should not be undertaken unless it is consistent with the desired character for the zone.

5. Development should be sited and designed to promote linkages between the various developments

within the centre and adjoining main roads.

6. Facilities within the policy area should be sited and designed with a view to promoting after-hours use

to reinforce the centre as the focus of social activity.

7. Under croft or semi-basement car parking areas should not project above natural or finished ground

level by more than 1 metre.


City of Salisbury

Attachment B

m) 45

8. There is no maximum floor area for shops or groups of shops in the policy area

9. Pedestrian shelter and shade should be provided over footpaths through the use of structures such as

awnings, canopies and verandas.

10. the ground level street frontages of buildings should contribute to the appearance and retail function

of the area by providing at least 5 metres or 60 per cent of the street frontage (whichever is greater) as

an entry/ foyer or display window to a shop (including a café or restaurant) or other community or

commercial use which provides pedestrian interest and activation

11. The finished floor level of the ground floor of buildings should be level with the footpath.

12. Development within the policy area should include covered pedestrian walkways to provide a link to

the bus stops and where possible buildings which are separate from the main retail area.

13. Major roadways within the policy area should:

a) be designed to ensure car parking areas are separated by a landscaped strip which is at least 3

metres wide

b) be designed so as not to provide direct access to car parking spaces

c) be designed to provide safe and convenient crossing places for pedestrians at frequent intervals,

with such crossing places being clearly distinguished from the roadway surface

14. Vehicle access/egress should not be provided from residential streets to commercial development

within the policy area.

15. Parking and access should be provided for emergency service vehicles, and provision should be made

where necessary for ambulance access to medical facilities established within the policy area.

16. Landscaping and planting of native trees, shrubs and ground cover should be undertaken extensively

to create favourable microclimatic conditions, to provide shade and for screening purposes with sites

adjacent to residential properties having landscaping strips at least three metres wide.

PROCEDURAL MATTERS

Complying Development

Complying developments are prescribed in Schedule 4 of the Development Regulations 2008. In addition, the following forms of development are designated as complying subject to the conditions contained in Table Sal/2 – Conditions for Complying Development:

(a) change in the use of land, from residential to office on the ground or first floor of a building in the Core Area shown in Concept Plan Fig UC/1.

k) 46

(b) change in the use of land, from residential to shop less than 250 square metres on the ground floor of a building in the Core Area shown in Concept Plan Fig UC/1 .

Non-complying Development

Development (including building work, a change in the use of land or division of an allotment) involving any of the following is non-complying:

Form of development Exceptions

Advertisement and/or advertising hoarding that achieves one or more of the following: (a) it moves, rotates or incorporates flashing

lights

(b) it is attached to a building and any part

extends above the roof line of the building.

Fuel depot

General industry

Light Industry

Public service depot

Road transport terminal

Service trade premises

Special industry

Store

Transport depot

Warehouse

Waste reception, storage, treatment or disposal

Public Notification

Categories of public notification are prescribed in Schedule 9 of the Development Regulations 2008. In addition, the following forms of development, or any combination of (except where the development is classified as non-complying), are designated:

Category 1 Category 2

Advertisement All forms of development not listed as Category 1

Aged persons accommodation

All forms of development that are ancillary and in association with residential development

Art Gallery

Consulting room

communication dish

Dwelling

Dwelling and office

Educational establishment

Hall

Hotel where located within the Core Area

Indoor recreation facility

Nursing home

Office

Parking facility

Pre-school

Primary school

Recreation area


City of Salisbury

Attachment B

m) 47

Research and Development where located in the Mawson Innovation Policy Area

Residential flat buildings

Retirement village

Shop or group of shops where located: (a) within the Main Shopping Policy Area (b) outside of the Main Shopping Policy Area, with a gross leasable area of 500 square metres or less

Supported accommodation

Telecommunications facility

Tourist accommodation

k) 48

Attachment C


City of Salisbury

Attachment C

n) 49

Infrastructure Policy Area 9


Noise

5 Acoustic treatment should be applied to development that impacts on adjacent residential areas

over and above that for which the existing acoustic fencing and noise dampening is designed.

Salisbury Council

Mapping Section

Map Reference Tables

o) 5

0

Attachment D

Salisbury Council

Mapping Section


p) 5

1


Index Maps

Map Reference

Council Index Map

Zone Maps

Zone Name Map Numbers

Airfield (Parafield) Zone Sal/33, Sal/34, Sal/40, Sal/41, Sal/42, Sal/47, Sal/48

Caravan and Tourist Park Zone Sal/23

Coastal Conservation Zone Sal/5, Sal/13, Sal/14, Sal/20, Sal/21, Sal/29, Sal/30, Sal/37, Sal/38,

Sal/44, Sal/45

Coastal Marina Zone Sal/13

Coastal Open Space Zone Sal/13

Coastal Settlement Zone Sal/13

Commercial Zone Sal/26, Sal/27, Sal/34, Sal/35, Sal/39, Sal/42, Sal/48, Sal/49,

Sal/53, Sal/54, Sal/56,

Community Zone Sal/33, Sal/34, Sal/39

Deferred Urban Zone Sal/15, Sal/16, Sal/22, Sal/23, Sal/38, Sal/39, Sal/44, Sal/45,

Sal/46, Sal/51, Sal/52

District Centre Zone Sal/24, Sal/25, Sal/26, Sal/33, Sal/34, Sal/55, Sal/57

Excluded Zone Sal/2, Sal/3, Sal/4, Sal/9, Sal/10, Sal/11, Sal/12, Sal/18, Sal/19

Salisbury Council

Mapping Section


o) 5

2


Hills Face Zone Sal/28

Industry Zone Sal/5, Sal/6, Sal/13, Sal/14, Sal/15, Sal/16, Sal/18, Sal/21, Sal/22,

Sal/23, Sal/25, Sal/26, Sal/27, Sal/30, Sal/31, Sal/32, Sal/33,


Sal/48, Sal/49, Sal/52, Sal/53, Sal/54, Sal/57

Light Industry Zone Sal/53

Local Centre Zone Sal/18, Sal/24, Sal/25, Sal/27, Sal/32, Sal/33, Sal/34, Sal/35,

Sal/40, Sal/41, Sal/49, Sal/53, Sal/56

Mawson Lakes Urban Core Zone Sal/39, Sal/40, Sal/47, Sal/48

Multi Function Polis (The Levels) Zone Sal/39, Sal/40, Sal/46, Sal/47, Sal/48, Sal/53

Mineral Extraction Zone Sal/5, Sal/6, Sal/13, Sal/14, Sal/20, Sal/21, Sal/29, Sal/30, Sal/31,

Sal/36, Sal/37, Sal/38, Sal/43

Neighbourhood Centre Zone Sal/17, Sal/18, Sal/23, Sal/24, Sal/25, Sal/26, Sal/27, Sal/32,



Open Space Zone Sal/15, Sal/16, Sal/17, Sal/23, Sal/24, Sal/25, Sal/26, Sal/27,



Sal/55, Sal/57

Primary Production Zone Sal/6, Sal/7, Sal/8, Sal/9, Sal/14, Sal/15, Sal/16, Sal/17, Sal/22,

Sal/23, Sal/31

Residential Zone Sal/9, Sal/10, Sal/16, Sal/17, Sal/18, Sal/12, Sal/24, Sal/25, Sal/26,




Residential Hills Zone Sal/27, Sal/28, Sal/36, Sal/42, Sal/43, Sal/50

Salisbury Council

Mapping Section


p) 5

3


Rural Living Zone Sal/9, Sal/10, Sal/17, Sal/18, Sal/28, Sal/31, Sal/38, Sal/39

Urban Employment Zone Sal/2, Sal/4, Sal/8, Sal/9, Sal/10, Sal/11, Sal/12, Sal/16, Sal/17,


Policy Area Maps

Policy Area Name Map Numbers

Globe Derby Park Policy Area 1 Sal/39

Ingle Farm Policy Area 2 Sal/55

Salisbury Town Centre Policy Area 3 Sal/25, Sal/26, Sal/34, Sal/57

Salisbury Downs Policy Area 4 Sal/24, Sal/25, Sal/33

Burton Poultry Processing Policy Area 5 Sal/16

Greater Levels Policy Area 8 Sal/46, Sal/47, Sal/53

Infrastructure Policy Area 9 Sal/5, Sal/6, Sal/15, Sal/16, Sal/21, Sal/22, Sal/23, Sal/30, Sal/31, Sal/32, Sal/46, Sal/47, Sal/52, Sal/54

Parafield Gardens Policy Area 10 Sal/31, Sal/32, Sal/39

Pooraka Policy Area 11 Sal/53

Pooraka Market Eastern Policy Area 12 Sal/53

Pooraka Market Warehousing Policy Area 13 Sal/53

Landscape Buffer Policy Area 14 Sal/16, Sal/17, Sal/31, Sal/32, Sal/39, Sal/46, Sal/47, Sal/48, Sal/53, Sal/54

Salisbury Council

Mapping Section


o) 5

4

Policy Area Name Map Numbers

Recreation Policy Area 15 Sal/23, Sal/24, Sal/25, Sal/26, Sal/27, Sal/28, Sal/31, Sal/32, Sal/35, Sal/36, Sal/38, Sal/39, Sal/42, Sal/43, Sal/50, Sal/53, Sal/54, Sal/55, Sal/57

Aircraft Noise Policy Area 16 Sal/9, Sal/17

Horticulture Policy Area 17 Sal/6, Sal/7, Sal/8, Sal/15, Sal/16

Salisbury Residential Policy Area 18 Sal/25

Bolivar Policy Area 19 Sal/31, Sal/38, v

Direk Policy Area 20 Sa/2, Sal/9, Sal/10, Sal/17, Sal/18

Salisbury Heights Policy Area 21 Sal/28

Mawson Lakes Sal/37, Sal/40, Sal/47, Sal/53

Mary Dan Sal/47, Sal/53

Mawson Innovation Sal/47, Sal/48

Main Shopping Sal/47

Run Way Public Safety Sal/36

Precinct Maps

Precinct Name Map Numbers

Precinct 1 Salisbury Plains Commercial Sal/35

Precinct 2 Deferred Urban Sal/38, Sal/39, Sal/44, Sal/45, Sal/46, Sal/51, Sal/52

Precinct 3 Deferred Industry Sal/15, Sal/16, Sal/22, Sal/23

Precinct 4 Community and Business Sal/55

Salisbury Council

Mapping Section


p) 5

5

Precinct Name Map Numbers

Precinct 5 Education Sal/55

Precinct 6 Medium Density Residential Sal/55

Precinct 7 Recreation Sal/55

Precinct 8 Retail Core Sal/55

Precinct 9 Civic Sal/25, Sal/57

Precinct 10 Commercial Sal/25, Sal/26, Sal/34, Sal/57

Precinct 11 Community and Tertiary Sal/25, Sal/26

Precinct 12 Interchange Sal/25, Sal/57

Precinct 13 Retail Core Sal/25, Sal/26, Sal/57

Precinct 14 Bulky Goods Sal/24, Sal/33

Precinct 15 Community Sal/33

Precinct 16 Mixed Use Sal/24, Sal/25, Sal/33

Precinct 17 Retail Core Sal/24, Sal/33

Precinct 18 Saints Road Neighbourhood Centre Sal/26, Sal/27, Sal/35

Precinct 19 Limited Residential Sal/9, Sal/17

Overlay Maps

Issue Map Numbers

Location Sal/1, Sal/2, Sal/3, Sal/4, Sal/5, Sal/6, Sal/7, Sal/8, Sal/9, Sal/10, Sal/11,

Sal/12, Sal/13, Sal/14, Sal/15, Sal/16, Sal/17, Sal/18, Sal/19, Sal/20, Sal/21,



Salisbury Council

Mapping Section


o) 5

6

Issue Map Numbers



Transport Sal/1, Sal/2, Sal/4, Sal/7, Sal/8, Sal/9, Sal/12, Sal/16, Sal/17, Sal/18, Sal/19,



Sal/50, Sal/51, Sal/52, Sal/53, Sal/54, Sal/55, Sal/56

Heritage Sal/1, Sal/10, Sal/11, Sal/12, Sal/18, Sal/23, Sal/24, Sal/25, Sal/26, Sal/27,


Development Constraints Sal/1, Sal/2, Sal/5, Sal/6, Sal/8, Sal/9, Sal/13, Sal/14, Sal/15, Sal/16, Sal/17,




Sal/48, Sal/49, Sal/50, Sal/51, Sal/52, Sal/53, Sal/54, Sal/55, Sal/56

Natural Resources Sal/1, Sal/5, Sal/6, Sal/13, Sal/14, Sal/20, Sal/21, Sal/29, Sal/30, Sal/31,

Sal/37, Sal/38, Sal/39, Sal/44, Sal/45, Sal/46, Sal/51

Strategic Transport Routes Sal/2, Sal/8, Sal/9, Sal/10, Sal/11, Sal/16, Sal/18

Bushfire Protection Overlay Maps

Bushfire Map Type BPA Map Numbers

Bushfire Protection - Bushfire Risk Sal/1, Sal/2, Sal/3

Concept Plan Maps

Concept Plan Title Map Numbers

Edinburgh Defence Airfield (Area Control) Regulations Concept Plan Map Sal/1

Edinburgh Defence Airfield Aircraft Noise Exposure Concept Plan Map Sal/2

Edinburgh Defence Airfield Lighting Constraints Concept Plan Map Sal/3

Salisbury Council

Mapping Section


p) 5

7


Globe Derby Park Concept Plan Map Sal/4

Salisbury Downs District Centre Concept Plan Map Sal/5

Urban Employment Zone Concept Plan Map Sal/6

Greater Edinburgh Parks Concept Plan Map Sal/7

Mawson Lakes Concept Plan Map Sal/8

Pooraka Light Industry Concept Plan Map Sal/9

North East Salisbury Concept Plan Map Sal/10

Waterloo Corner Road Neighbourhood Centre Concept Plan Map Sal/11

Bolivar Road Neighbourhood Centre Concept Plan Map Sal/12

Whites Road Neighbourhood Centre Concept Plan Map Sal/13

Shepherdson Road Neighbourhood Centre Concept Plan Map Sal/14

Kings Road Neighbourhood Centre Concept Plan Map Sal/15

Saints Rd Salisbury Plain Neighbourhood Centre Concept Plan Map Sal/16

The Paddocks Open Space Zone Concept Plan Map Sal/17

Parafield Gardens Residential Area 1 Concept Plan Map Sal/18

Pooraka Open Space Recreation Concept Plan Map Sal/19

Old Spot Hotel Concept Plan Map Sal/20

MOSS Open Space Recreation Concept Plan Map Sal/21

Burton Residential Area 1 Concept Plan Map Sal/22

Salisbury Council

Mapping Section


o) 5

8


Direk Residential Area Concept Plan Map Sal/23

Frost Road/Brown Terrace Salisbury Concept Plan Map Sal/24

Paralowie Residential Area 1 Concept Plan Map Sal/25

Paralowie Residential Area 2 Concept Plan Map Sal/26

Salisbury Downs Residential Area 1 Concept Plan Map Sal/27

Salisbury District Centre Car Park Fund Area Concept Plan Map Sal/28

Ingle Farm District Centre Car Park Fund Area Concept Plan Map Sal/29

Mawson Lakes Car Park Fund Area Concept Plan Map Sal/30


City of Salisbury

Attachment D

r) 59

Attachment E

r) 61

Attachment F

Version A 15/10/13

Urban CoreUC

OS

R

R

OS

C

UC

RuL

Cu

DU

C

OS

OS

R

In

70.00m

70.00m

A3

A2A25

A65

A201

A1

A200

A61

A38

A500

A3

A501

A1000

A1

A23A100

A22

A16

A6

A503

A502

A501

A20

A13

A1

A201

A24

A2

A57

A66

A1002

A67

A7

A191

A876

A507

A41

A2

A2

A2

A1

A17

A101

A46

A35

A502

A2

A71

A68

A101

A13

DANIEL A

Q UOND

ONG AV

MALTA DR

FLAV

IOA

MO

RTO

N ST

LANTA

NADR

ELDER SMITH RD

ST EL

IAS

ST

AIR

DR

IEAV

KINGBORNRD

CEDAR AV

HUDSON RD

BELF

REE DR

DIN

EER

D

TA HLIA CT

PO

RT

WA

KEF

IELD

RD GREENFIELDS DR

BERNO

CTALABA

RCR

GRAYLI

NG CT

TROTT

ERS

DR

NEWLAND WY

POR

TW

AKEF IE

LDR

D

GEORGE

STSANCTUA

RY

DR

LORD HOWE CR

INNES CC

T

VALE

TTA

CT

EVER

GL AD

E

ST

LAKEFIELD CR

GL O

B E D E R B Y

D R

SA

LI S

BU

RY

HW

Y

E L D E R D R

WH

I TE

S R

D

MA

RT

I NS

RD

R Y A N S R D

SALISBURY COUNCIL

Zone Map Sal/39

0 500m

MAP Sal/31 Adjoins MAP Sal/32 Adjoins


MA

P Sa

l/38

Adj

oins

MA

P Sal/40 Adjoins

Lamberts Conformal Conic Projection, GDA94

Zones

CommercialC

CommunityCu

Deferred UrbanDU

IndustryIn

Open SpaceOS

ResidentialR

Rural LivingRuL

Zone Boundary

361/D071/09

Version A 29/12/14

CommercialC

Open SpaceOS

Urban CoreUC

R

OSRR

InUC

UC

OS

C

UC

R

90°

90°

Af(P)

R

NCe

LCe

In

A998

A38

A1222

A3

A17

A17

A5

A3010

A2

A1002

Q50

A34 A97

A15

A101

A1

A96

A464

A11

A102

A125

A51

A13

A16

A27

A502

A280

A50

A75

A3

A4

A1001

A1003

A64

LANTA

NADR

AUGUSTINE ST

COVENTRY S

OLE

AND

ER D

R

M O

WB

RS

TRYDER A

ELD

ER

DR

CATALINA A

PONSFORD CR

HATHERLEIGHRD

TAYLOR ST

RIVERSIDE

ST

MACARTNEYRD

LINCOLN AV

BRAD

MAN

RD

QUICK

ST

WYA

TTR

STKITT PL

RIDLEY ST

BIMINI CR

HALIFAX A

LANCASTER AV

ST IVES DRLAMORNA PDE

OLDFIELD ST

ATIU ST

O'NEILL ST

RICHARDSON ST

GR

EN

ADA CT

BORDU

Y P

L

RESTHAVENRD

MOS

SMAN ST

O'REI

LLY

ST

KELLEWAY ST

TALLO

ST

ROSALIE TCE

THE

DR

IVE

BYST

MCCABE AV

ARMSTRO N

A

WAL

KER ST

DERW

ENTST

TYE

ST

GRI

MMET

TA

TAM

IR RD

WOODFU

LLST

HUONST

WAT

TLE

GR

JACKS

ON

S

JENNIFE

TCE

MAPL A

SUSA

NS

SHORNEY

RD

SWEET ST

WELLINGTON AV

OXFORD

ST

MEREDITHST

ANSO

N AV

MARY

ST

BOSTON

A

KATST

SOPHIA ST

ELLI

S LANE

ANTIGUA CT

JOCELYN TCELUCI

PL

SPEN

CER ST

NEWLY

NTC

E

ANNA ST

BIRCH

GR

LINDW

ALL

ST

PELLEW

S

GREENFIELDS DR

MIL

LER CR

BARNESCR

ORMSBY

AV

NUCERA CT

BLAC

KIE

AV

MACKAY CR

TRUMPE

RA

VIC

TOR

I APD

CASCADES D R

ADELINE ST

ISLA

CCT

MAPLETON CCT

SANT OR

INI

WA

LK

FRANKLIN A

WAT

ER

BROOK CT

NELSON CR

MCDONALD

RD

HILDITCH DR

MAI

LEYCR

BARDSL

EY AV

S HE P H E R D S O

N R D

SA

LI S

BU

RY

HW

YR Y A N S

R D

E L D E R

S MI T H

R D

SALISBURY COUNCIL

Zone Map Sal/40

0 500m


Zones

Airfield (Parafield)Af(P)

IndustryIn

Local CentreLCe

Neighbourhood CentreNCe

Zone Boundary



MA

P Sa

l/39

Adj

oins

MA

P Sal/41 Adjoins

ResidentialR

version A 28/5/14

ResidentialR

OS

In

RDU

OS

OS

InIn

70.00m

70.00m

Q16

A46

A302

A107

A71

A72

A500

A905

A300

A21

A1A100

A2

A51

A110

Q14

A54

A50

Q19

A51

A701

A101

A17

A2

A72

A700

A1

PO

RT

WA

KE

FIE

LD R

D

SALI

SBU

RY

HW

Y

PO

RT

WA

KE

FIE

LD R

D

JONA

L D

R

PO

RT

WA

KEFI

E LD

RD

CARDI

FF CT

KIDMAN RD

NEWC

AS

T LE C

R

MCL

EOD

CT

JON

ADR

VATE

RST

DR

Y C

RE

EK

I NT

G R

AM

P F

RO

M W

I NG

FIE

LD

DR

Y C

RE

EK

I NT

G R

AM

P F

RO

M S

AL

I SB

UR

Y

SALISBURY COUNCIL

Zone Map Sal/46

0 500m

MAP Sal/39 AdjoinsMAP Sal/38 Adjoins


MA

P Sa

l/45

Adj

oins

MA

P Sal/47 Adjoins


Zones

Deferred UrbanDU

IndustryIn

Open SpaceOS

Zone Boundary

!P

OS

UCUC

UC

UC

CIn

In

OS

OS

OS

R R

R

R

R

R

Version A 15/10/13

Urban CoreUC

CommercialC

Af(P)

OSR

In

A71

A877

A876

A54

A202

A998

A852

A544

A203

A900

A404

A9

A302

A231

A301

A12

A72

A500

A905

A65

A50

A61

A18

A49

A55

A843

A41

A100

A1000

A303

A501

A232

A700

A911

A14

A201

A899

A5

A541

A909

A200

A1

A51

A53

A780

A140

A600

A1002

A403

A10

A403

A271

A63

A50

A850

A10

A809

A153

A701

A312

A19

A56

A779

A101

A11

A11

A601

A601

A1

A101

A50

A966

A777

A3

A10

A5

A33

A62

A52

A3

A602

A681

A1200

A302

A402

PEPPERCORN CC T

LAKEWO OD CT

GAR

DE

NTC

E

WINDERMERE C R

DUTTON A

ST ATION LANE

ELD

ER CCT

THE

WA

LK

SH

EA

OA

K D

R

SHEARWATER DR

HE

RO

N W

ALK

TECHNOLOGY DR

FIRST

AV

ROSELLA ST

ELMWO OD CT

PRION CCT

HAMI LTON

PL

PIN CT

METRO

PD

GR

AS

SW

R

EN WY

COOPERS C

GOODALL PDE

CO

RM

OR

AN

T W

Y

YATE

S S

T

PE

NI N

SU

LAD

R

MARY

ST

JONAL

DR

BR

OO

KSIDE DR

MCKINLAY CT

MA

INS

T

PARK WY

YAR

LES

T

CARNEGIE PL

AVOCE

T D

R

MAIN

NORTH RD

BLUE WREN CCT

EM

ERAL

DST

AR

GY

LE S

T

HURTLE PDE

GRA

SSMERE PL

LAKESIDE CL

UNIVERSITY PDE

LIGHT CMN

MACMILLAN

A

HIN DMAR

SH CCT

PILL

IEC

PIKE

A

FOWLER ST

SIGNAL CT

SP

EN

CE

R

CT

PO

MAR

I NE

ST

PLO

VER

ST

CB

FISH

ER

DR

ORIO

LE WALK

DARBY LA

NE

CYGNET ST

DO

TTE

REL PL

SAL

ZMANN

DR

GANNET ST

BRIMPTON AV

E W

PITT

S AV

SHAR

P CT

KINGFISHER AV

TRIN

ITY

CCT

HA

RV

EY

CC

T

ELDER

DR

THE STRAND

C

REEKV IEW

DR

FROME C

SW

AN

CC

T

LOM

ON

D C

CT

FOURTH A

PAR

K VIE

WD

R

SHO

ALH

AVE

N C

CT

WIL

LOW

OOD C

T

ROBINSON ST

EUSTON

WAL

BAIR

ST

EGRET ST

PARKDALE C

DANST

STO

NY WY

W E ATH

ER

STO

NE

CR

PIE

R

LANE

DOUGLAS DR

MAW

SONLA

KES

BVD

MAWSOLAK

ESB

VD

MALLARD CR

THIR

DA

TH

MEW

E L D E R S M I T H R D

SAL I S

BUR

Y H

WY

L E V E L S R D

MA W

S ON

L A K E S B V D

CR

OS

S

KE

YS

RD

SALISBURY COUNCIL

Zone Map Sal/47

0 500 m



MA

P Sa

l/46

Adj

oins

MA

P Sal/48 Adjoins


Zones


IndustryIn

Open SpaceOS

ResidentialR

Zone Boundary

Version A 15/10/13

Urban CoreUC

UC

Af(P)

C

OS

OS

OS

R

R

NCe

NCe

NCe

In

A12

A231

A17

A24

A25

A501

A146

A770

A10

A14

A816

A3

A62A88

A753

A807

A3

A53

A5

A62

A10

A501

A808

A807

A16

A53

A152

Q50A26

A153

A150

A400

A18 A101

A1

A1000

A23

A583

A2

A1

A16

A247

A8

A13

Q51

A106

A182

A20

A7

A8

A402

A1200

A14

A52

A201

A52

A1

A100

FOSTE

R ST

QUIGLEY ST

PARK

WY

RESEARCH

RD

SCALES AV

LARSSON

ST

ABRAHAM ST

SANDOW

AV

MUSICKA AV

BURNS

A

BADCOE ST

NEW

FIEL

DRD

RAIN

SDR

WEE

NRD

BALOO ST

EMERAL DR

HENDERSON

AVCOW

AN DR

MAI

N NORTH

RD

RA

DOM

I AV

LEWIS CT

KAVANAGHCT

RIVETT

PL

HIL

LIE

RS

T

MITCHINSON GR

DUFFIE

LD

DR

COL

LINS

CT

JAY

ST

LANGFORD ST

BRAD

Y CT HARDY CT

CARLYLE CR

PAGE C

T

MCGOWAN ST

EARLE CT

LUSH RD

WHIT

ST

LYNCH

CT

STANW

AY ST

HOCKINGCR

JOSE CT

BAKER TCE

PALM

ER CT

MCBRYDE CT

SECOND AV

DE

VONCOURT AV

KINDAL

ECT

HOUSTON

TCE

DUKAS DR

TEMP

LACR

MAIN

NORTH RD

NO

AC

K P

L

WH

EE

L ER

A

WO

OD

CO

CK

CR

LOCK CR

CASTON

ST

PATER

SON

RD

HUGHES CR

VAN LEEUWEN DR

DAVIDSONCT

STEEN CR

BATT

EN CR

MAN

NIN

GC

R

MA X W

E L L

R D

MA W

S ON

L A K E S B V D

BR

I DG

E

RD

E L D E R

S M I T H

R D

SALISBURY COUNCIL

Zone Map Sal/48

0 500 m


MAP Sal/54 Adjoins

MA

P Sa

l/47

Adj

oins

MA

P Sal/49 Adjoins


Zones


CommercialC

IndustryIn

Neighbourhood CentreNCe

Open SpaceOS

ResidentialR

Zone Boundary

!P

Version A 15/10/13

COS

RIn

LIn

C

C C

OSOS

OS

R

R

LCe

In

180o

A20

A104

A50

A8

A5

A16

A200

A5010

A21

A53

A11

A302

A5020

A3

Q1012

A126

Q1010

A771

A12

Q97

A2

A1

Q95

A2

A1090

A77

A2

A53

A112

A21

Q203

A62 A57

A76

A14

A116

A400

A1

A136

A23

A23

A7

A6

A90

A104

Q19

A56 A101

A211

A17

Q17

A77

Q100

A5

A15

Q1011

A72

Q5005

A10

A96

Q20

A101

A2

A34

A75

A58

A1101

A24

A102

A152A201

A5001A5002

PO

RT

WA

KE

F IEL D

RD

ROYAL AV

ME

RC

HAN

T C

R

GOLD

SBORO

UGH

RD

GAR

NAUT

A

CAVAN RD

THOMAS ST

WHITE RD

SOUTH TCE

MAT

THEW

S RD

BURMA RD

MAI

N NO

RTH

RDED

WIN

ST

MAI

NNO

RTH

RD

SHAR

P CT

WILLIAMS

CCT

ALBERT ST

RIC

HA

RD AV

WIL

LIA

M S

T

CHERRY LANE

GLOVER AV

FREDERICKS

CHE LLAS

TON

AV

SCOTT

ST

ADAL

UMA

A

PO

RT

WA

KEF

IELD

RD

GOLD

SBO

ROUG

H RD

PRODUCE LANE

MARKET LANE

M O N T A G U E R D

P R A T T

A V

CR

OSS

KEYS RD

D I A G O N A L

R D

C A VA

N R

D

Port AdelaideEnfield Council

SALISBURY COUNCIL

Zone Map Sal/53

0 500m

MAP Sal/1 Adjoins

MAP Sal/47 AdjoinsM

AP

Sal/5

2 A

djoi

nsM

AP Sal/54 A

djoins


Zones

CommercialC

IndustryIn

Light IndustryLIn

Local CentreLCe

Open SpaceOS

ResidentialR

Zone Boundary

Development Plan Boundary

s) 62

Attachment G

Version A 15/10/13

37

37

Mawson Lakes

70.00m

70.00m

A2

A71

A68

A101

A876

A3

A2A25

A65

A201

A1

A200

A61

A38

A500

A3

A501

A1000

A1002

A1

A23A100

A22

A16

A6

A503

A502

A501

A20

A13

A1

A201

A24

A2

A57

A66

A67

A7

A191

A46

A507

A41

A2

A2

A2

A1

A17

A101

A13

A35

A502

EV

ERG

L AD

E

ST

LAKEFIELDCR

DANIEL A

QUOND

O

NA

MALTA DR

FLAV

IOA

MO

RTO

N ST

LANTA

NA DR

ELDER SMITH RD

ST EL

IAS

ST

AIR

DR

IE AV

KINGBORN RD

CEDAR A

HUDSONRD

BELF

REEDR

DIN

EER

D

TA HLIA CT

PO

RT

WA

KE

FIE

LD R

D GREENFIELDS DR

BERNO

CTALABA

RCR

GRAYLI

NGCT

TROTT

ERS

DR

NEWLAND WY

POR

TW

AKEF IE

LDR

D

GEORGE

STSANCTUA

RY

DR

LORD HOWE CR

INNES CC

T

VALE

TTA

CT

GL O

B E D E R B Y

D R

SA

LI S

BU

RY

HW

Y

E L D E R D R

WH

I TE

S R

D

MA

RT

I NS

RD

R Y A N S R D

19

1

14

14

15

10

SALISBURY COUNCIL

Policy Area Map Sal/39

0 500m


Policy Area Boundary

Policy Area 11014151937

Globe Derby ParkParafield GardensLandscape BufferRecreationBolivar



MA

P Sa

l/38

Adj

oins

MA

P Sal/40 Adjoins

361/D071/09

Version A 28/5/14

32

37

3237

Industry Zone - Infrastructure Mawson Lakes

70.00m

70.00m

A2

A72

Q16

A46

A302

A1

A71

A72

A500

A905

A300

A21

A1A100

A107

A700

A2

A51

A110

Q14

A54

A50

Q19

A51

A701

A101

A17

VATE

RST

PO

RT

WA

KEFI

E LD

RD

PO

RT

WA

KE

FIE

LD R

D

SALI

SBU

RY

HW

Y

PO

RT

WA

KE

FIE

LD R

D

JONA

L D

R

CARDI

FF CT

KIDMAN RD

NEWC

AS

T LE C

R

MCL

EOD

CT

JON

ADR

DR

Y C

RE

EK

I NT

G R

AM

P F

RO

M W

I NG

FIE

LD

DR

Y C

RE

EK

I NT

G R

AM

P F

RO

M S

AL

I SB

UR

Y14

14

8

9

SALISBURY COUNCIL


0 500m



Policy Area 8 914

Greater LevelsInfrastructureLandscape Buffer



MA

P Sa

l/45

Adj

oins

MA

P Sal/47 Adjoins

!P

Version A 28/5/14

37

37

37

37

35

37

34

33

33

33

32

3233343537

Industry Zone - InfrastructureMawson InnovationMary DanMain ShoppingMawson Lakes

A140

A302

A71

A877

A876

A54

A202

A998

A852

A544

A203

A900

A404

A9

A302

A231

A301

A12

A72

A500

A905

A65

A50

A61

A18

A49

A55

A843

A41

A100

A1000

A303

A501

A232

A700

A911

A14

A201

A899

A5

A541

A909

A200

A1

A51

A53

A780

A402

A600

A1002

A403

A10

A403

A271

A63

A50

A850

A10

A809

A153

A701

A312

A19

A56

A779

A101

A11

A11

A601

A601

A1

A101

A50

A966

A777

A3

A10

A5

A33

A62

A52

A3

A602

A681

A1200

TH

MEW

LAKEWO OD CT

PEPPERCORN CC T

GAR

DE

NTC

E

WINDERMERE C R

DUTTON A

ST ATION LANE

ELD

ER CCT

THE

WA

LK

SH

EA

OA

K D

R

SHEARWATER DR

HE

RO

N W

ALK

TECHNOLOGY DR

FIRST

AV

ROSELLA ST

ELMWO OD CT

PRION CCT

HAMI LTON

PL

PIN CT

METRO

PD

GR

AS

SW

R

EN WY

COOPERS C

GOODALL PDE

CO

RM

OR

AN

T W

Y

YATE

S S

T

PE

NI N

SU

LAD

R

MARY

ST

JONAL

DR

BR

OO

KSIDE DR

MCKINLAY CT

MA

INS

T

PARK WY

YAR

LES

T

CARNEGIE PL

AVOCE

T D

R

MAI

NNORTH

RD

BLUE WREN CCT

EM

ERAL

DST

AR

GY

LE S

T

HURTLE PDE

GRA

SSMERE PL

LAKESIDE CL

UNIVERSITY PDE

LIGHT CMN

MACMILLAN

A

HIN DMAR

SH CCT

PILL

IEC

PIKE

A

FOWLER ST

SIGNAL CT

SP

EN

CE

R

CT

PO

MAR

I NE

ST

PLO

VER

ST

CB

FISH

ER

DR

ORIO

LE WALK

DARBY LA

NE

CYGNET ST

DO

TTE

REL PL

SAL

ZMANN

DR

GANNET ST

BRIMPTON AV

E W

PITT

S AV

SHAR

P CT

KINGFISHER AV

TRIN

ITY

CCT

HA

RV

EY

CC

T

ELDER

DR

THE STRAND

C

REEKV IEW

DR

FROME C

SW

AN

CC

T

LOM

ON

D C

CT

FOURTH A

PAR

K VIE

WD

R

SHO

ALH

AVE

N C

CT

WIL

LOW

OOD C

T

ROBINSON ST

EUSTON

WAL

BAIR

ST

EGRET ST

PARKDALE C

DANST

STO

NY WY

W E ATH

ER

STO

NE

CR

PIE

R

LANE

DOUGLAS DR

MAW

SONLA

KES

BVD

MAWSOLAK

ESB

VD

MALLARD CR

THIR

DA

E L D E R S M I T H R D

SAL I S

BUR

Y H

WY

L E V E L S

R D

MA W

S ON

L A K E S B V D

CR

OS

S

KE

YS

RD

14

8

SALISBURY COUNCIL


0 500 m



Policy Area 814

Greater LevelsLandscape Buffer



MA

P Sa

l/46

Adj

oins

MA

P Sal/48 Adjoins

Version A 28/5/14

500m

180°

36

33

3336

Mawson InnovationRun Way Public Safety

A5 A1

A12

A231

A17

A24

A25

A501

A146

A770

A10 A14

A816

A3

A62A88

A753

A807

A3

A53

A16

A62

A10

A501

A808

A807

A16

A53

A152

Q50A26

A153

A150

A400

A18 A101

A1

A1000

A23

A583

A2

A1

A100

A247

A8 A13

Q51

A106

A182

A20

A7

A8

A402

A1200

A14

A52

A201

A52

FOSTE

R ST

MAN

NIN

GC

R

QUIGLEY ST

PARK

WY

RESEARCH

RD

SCALES AV

LARSSON

ST

ABRAHAM ST

SANDOW

AV

MUSICKA AV

BURNS

A

BADCOE ST

NEW

FIEL

DRD

RAIN

SDR

WEE

NRD

BALOO ST

EMERAL DR

HENDERSON

AVCOW

AN DR

MAI

N NORTH

RD

RA

DOM

I AV

LEWIS CT

KAVANAGHCT

RIVETT

PL

HIL

LIE

RS

T

MITCHINSON GR

DUFFIE

LD

DR

COL

LINS

CT

JAY

ST

LANGFORD ST

BRAD

Y CT HARDY CT

CARLYLE CR

PAGE C

T

MCGOWAN ST

EARLE CT

LUSH RD

WHIT

ST

LYNCH

CT

HARME

CT

STANW

AY ST

HOCKINGCR

JOSE CT

BAKER TCE

PALM

ER CT

MCBRYDE CT

SECOND AV

DE

VONCOURT AV

KINDAL

ECT

HOUSTON

TCE

DUKAS DR

TEMP

LACR

MAIN

NORTH RD

NO

AC

K P

L

WH

EE

L ER

A

WO

OD

CO

CK

CR

LOCK CR

CASTON

ST

PATER

SON

RD

HUGHES CR

VAN LEEUWEN DR

DAVIDSONCT

STEEN CR

BATT

EN CR

BR

I DG

E

RD

MA X W

E L L

R D

MA W

S ON

L A K E S B V D

E L D E R

S M I T H R D

14

14

SALISBURY COUNCIL


0 500 m



Policy Area14 Landscape Buffer


MAP Sal/54 Adjoins

MA

P Sa

l/47

Adj

oins

MA

P Sal/49 Adjoins

!P

Version A 15/10/13

3734

3437

Mary DanMawson Lakes

180o

A24

A102

A152A201

A5001

A5002

A20

A104

A50

A8

A5

A16

A200

A5010

A21

A53

A11

A302

A5020

A3

Q1012

A126

Q1010

A771

A12

Q97

A2

A1

Q95

A2

A1090

A77

A2

A53

A112

A21

Q203

A62 A57

A76

A14

A116

A400

A1

A136

A23

A23

A7

A6

A90

A104

Q19

A56

A101

A211

A17

Q17

A77

Q100

A5

A15

Q1011

A72

Q5005

A10

A96

Q20

A101

A2

A34

A75

A58

A1101

MARKET LANE

MER

CH

ANT

C

ROYAL AV

GOLDSBOR O U GRD

GAR

NAUT

A

PO

RT

WA

KE

F IEL D

RD

CAVAN RD

THOMAS ST

WHITE RD

SOUTH TCE

MAT

THEW

S RD

WILLIAMS

CCT

BURMA RD

MAI

N NO

RTH

RD

EDW

IN ST

MAI

N NO

RTH

RD

SHAR

P CT

ALBERT ST

RIC

HA

RD AV

WIL

LIA

M S

T

CHERRY LANE

GLOVER AV

FREDERICKS

CHE LLAS

TON

AV

SCOTT

ST

ADAL

UMA

A

PO

RT

WA

KE

FIE

LD R

D

GOLD

SBO

ROUG

H RD

PRODUCE LANE

M O N T A G U E R D

P R A T T

A V

CR

OSS

KEYS RD

C A VA

N R

D

D I A G O N A L

R D

Port AdelaideEnfield Council

14

13 12

11

15

8

SALISBURY COUNCIL


0 500m



Development Plan Boundary

Policy Area

81112131415

PoorakaPooraka Market EasternPooraka Market WarehousingLandscape BufferRecreationGreater Levels

MAP Sal/1 Adjoins

MAP Sal/47 AdjoinsM

AP

Sal/5

2 A

djoi

nsM

AP Sal/54 A

djoins

r) 63

Attachment H

Version A 29/12/14

37

3737

37

37 Mawson Lakes

Policy Area Map Sal/40Policy Area Boundary

Policy Area

90°

A998

A38

A1222

A3

A17

A17

A5

A3010

A2

A1002

Q50

A34 A97

A15

A101

A1

A96

A464

A11

A102

A125

A51

A13

A16

A27

A502

A280

A50

A75

A3

A4

A1001

A1003

A64

LANTA

NADR

AUGUSTINE ST

COVENTRY S

OLE

AND

ER D

R

M O

WB

RS

TRYDER A

ELD

ER

DR

CATALINA A

PONSFORD CR

HATHERLEIGHRD

TAYLOR ST

RIVERSIDE

ST

MACARTNEYRD

LINCOLN AV

BRAD

MAN

RD

QUICK

ST

WYA

TTR

STKITT PL

RIDLEY ST

BIMINI CR

HALIFAX A

LANCASTER AV

ST IVES DRLAMORNA PDE

OLDFIELD ST

ATIU ST

O'NEILL ST

RICHARDSON ST

GR

EN

ADA CT

BORDU

Y P

L

RESTHAVENRD

MOS

SMAN ST

O'REI

LLY

ST

KELLEWAY ST

TALLO

ST

ROSALIE TCE

THE

DR

IVE

BYST

MCCABE AV

ARMSTRO N

A

WAL

KER ST

DERW

ENTST

TYE

ST

GRI

MMET

TA

TAM

IR RD

WOODFU

LLST

HUONST

WAT

TLE

GR

JACKS

ON

S

JENNIFE

TCE

MAPL A

SUSA

NS

SHORNEY

RD

SWEET ST

WELLINGTON AV

OXFORD

ST

MEREDITHST

ANSO

N AV

MARY

ST

BOSTON

A

KATST

SOPHIA ST

ELLI

S LANE

ANTIGUA CT

JOCELYN TCELUCI

PL

SPEN

CER ST

NEWLY

NTC

E

ANNA ST

BIRCH

GR

LINDW

ALL

ST

PELLEW

S

GREENFIELDS DR

MIL

LER CR

BARNESCR

ORMSBY

AV

NUCERA CT

BLAC

KIE

AV

MACKAY CR

TRUMPE

RA

VIC

TOR

I APD

CASCADES D R

ADELINE ST

ISLA

CCT

MAPLETON CCT

SANT OR

INI

WA

LK

FRANKLIN A

WAT

ER

BROOK CT

NELSON CR

MCDONALD

RD

HILDITCH DR

MAI

LEYCR

BARDSL

EY AV

S HE P H E R D S O

N R D

SA

LI S

BU

RY

HW

YR Y A N S

R D

E L D E R

S MI T H

R D

SALISBURY COUNCIL

0 500m




MA

P Sa

l/39

Adj

oins

MA

P Sal/41 Adjoins

s) 64

Attachment I

PARK

MONTAGUE ROAD

MONTAGUE ROAD

BENNETTMA

IN

MAIN

NORTH R

OAD

SALIS

BURY

HW

Y

SHAR

P

MAWSON LAKES

HENDERSON

ELDER SMITH

ISLA

THIR

D

GA

RD

EN

METRO

LANGFORD

LEVELS

COWAN

ELDER

DAN

CROSS K

EYS

CA

SC

AD

ES

LIGHT

NA

LPA

RESEARCH

BADCOE

BAIR

D

THE STRAND

ABRAHAM

YATE

S

WH

EE

LER

MU

RIE

L

FIRST

HUDSON

DUTTON

ATIU

HILDITCH

CB FISH

ER

SANDOW

DIAGONAL

PAR

KV

IEW

TRE

NTO

N

BIMINI

STE

EN

BURNS

CASTO

N

SHOAL

HAVEN

FOURTH

DOUGLAS

MOWBRAY

MARY

LIN

CO

LN

BAR

U

MINTARA

RO

SE

LLA

BATT

EN

TEMPLA

R

E W

PIT

TS

SCHUIT

MA

NN

ING

BAR

OO

NA

DUFFIE

LD

GREENFIELDS

DOBSON

QUINLIVAN

AVOCET

SALZ

MANN

HA

RV

EY

TRIN

ITY

CO

RM

OR

AN

T

MCCABE

PILLIE

AUGUSTINE

CAPITAL

HOUSTON

VICTORIA

UNIVERSITY

INN

ES

PHILLIPSON

ADELINE

SHEARWATER

EUSTON

RIVET

T

PETREL

SECOND

VAN LEEUWEN

LOM

ON

D

RIDLEY

COLLIN

S

ST KITTS

RAFFEN

EMER

ALD

GOODALL

HOPE

NELSON

VIN

E

FRANKLIN

CYGNET

JACARANDA

PALM

ER

PLO

VE

R

MALLARD

FRO

ME

ORIOLE

NO

ACK

HUGHES

LAKESIDE

AR

GY

LE

HE

RO

N

BORLA

CE

OTW

AY

ANTIGUA

EGRET

GRASSWREN

PINE

PO

MA

RIN

E

BRAD

Y

BO

RD

UY

ST C

LAIR

CHAPMAN

MAPLE

COOPERS

LOGAN

WEIRA

DIX

ON

DAVIE

S

CA

RN

EG

IE

CHERRY

HOLL

Y

WHARFDALE

ELDER SMITH

ELD

ER

Car Park Fund Area

metres0 400 800Scale 1:15000

CITY OF SALISBURY

Concept Plan Map Sal/30MAWSON LAKES

CAR PARK FUND AREA

Version A 28/5/14

Documents

City of Salisbury · 22nd January 2015 until 5pm 20th March 2015 by the public at: City of Salisbury Library, John Street, Salisbury Council Offices, James Street Salisbury Polaris