34
EVALUATION OF CITREX® ACTIVITY VS. A CHLORINE SOLUTION AS A DISINFECTANT DURING RAW SHRIMP PACKING PROCESS

Citrex610 f-en-citrex vs cloro en camaron

  • Upload
    citrex

  • View
    357

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Citrex610 f-en-citrex vs cloro en camaron

EVALUATION OF CITREX® ACTIVITY VS. A CHLORINE

SOLUTION AS A DISINFECTANT DURING RAW SHRIMP PACKING

PROCESS

Page 2: Citrex610 f-en-citrex vs cloro en camaron

PROCEDURE

• Samples were collected using the following protocol:• Product must be prepared using potable water, in agreement

with the recommended dose rate:• 2 milliliters per liter of solution for a 400 ppm final

concentration. Concentrated product solution was 200,000 ppm (20%).

• A fresh working solution must be prepared on the day of use, even though the molecule is stable, and preparation on the previous day does not decrease product’s microbicidal potency.

• 1.- Technical shrimp processing steps were performed.• 2.- A 400 ppm Lonlife solution is used for final rinsing. This

solution is not rinsed, but allowed to act on shrimp.• 3.- Proceed with packing and freezing processes.

Page 3: Citrex610 f-en-citrex vs cloro en camaron

• These assays were performed using a 200 ppm dyed Lonlife, solution, consistent with company’s regular practices, and without the previous use of any disinfectants.

• Assays were carried out on both white shrimp (sea catch) and farm-harvested shrimp.

• Assays were performed during different working shifts. A total of 3 assays were performed per product (i.e. 3 assays for sea shrimp and 3 for farm shrimp).

Page 4: Citrex610 f-en-citrex vs cloro en camaron

DETERMINATION OF PRODUCT-ESCORT HETEROTROPHIC BIOMASS

• Total mesophyllic microflora count was determined using PCA agar and deep seeding.

• The first 1:100 dilution was obtained as follows: A 10-g shrimp sample was macerated using a sterilized mortar then diluted in 90 ml sterile 1% peptone water.

• Afterwards, 1:100 serial dilutions were prepared by adding 1 ml of the first solution to the next, until a 105 dilution was obtained.

Page 5: Citrex610 f-en-citrex vs cloro en camaron

• Preparation was then seeded by pipetting 1 ml of the mix to the bottom of a Petri dish. 20 ml PCA agar were added then incubated for 24 - 48 hours at 35°C. After this time results were read.

• During January 2006 the first 12 samples were received. All 12 samples were processed in duplicate.

Page 6: Citrex610 f-en-citrex vs cloro en camaron
Page 7: Citrex610 f-en-citrex vs cloro en camaron

Assay 1 Assay 2

Sample Mesophylls Sample Mesophylls

Sample 1 3,000 Sample 1 400

Sample 2 4,000 Sample 2 4,000

Sample 3 1,800 Sample 3 3,000

400 ppm Citrex

Page 8: Citrex610 f-en-citrex vs cloro en camaron

Assay 1 Assay 2

Sample Mesophylls Sample Mesophylls

Sample 1 7,800 Sample 1 11,000

Sample 2 12,000 Sample 2 4,500

Sample 3 16,000 Sample 3 7,000

200 ppm Chlorine

Page 9: Citrex610 f-en-citrex vs cloro en camaron

Farm shrimp 400 ppm Citrex

Assay 1 Assay 2

Sample Mesophylls Sample Mesophylls

Sample 1 520 Sample 1 280

Sample 2 310 Sample 2 1,500

Sample 3 5,400 Sample 3 1,100

Sample 4 2,700 Sample 4 950

Page 10: Citrex610 f-en-citrex vs cloro en camaron

Assay 1 Assay 2

Sample Mesophylls Sample Mesophylls

Sample 1 3,500 Sample 1 1,500

Sample 2 4,700 Sample 2 2,600

Sample 3 1,900 Sample 3 2,200

Sample 4 3,300 Sample 4 1,100

200 ppm Chlorine

Page 11: Citrex610 f-en-citrex vs cloro en camaron

COLIMETRIC DETERMINATION TO ASSESS PRODUCT SANITARY SATUS POSTDISINFECTION

• Coliforms and E. coli were quantified by colimetric analysis. For this purpose the most probable number (MPN) technique was applied, using Brilla medium.

Page 12: Citrex610 f-en-citrex vs cloro en camaron
Page 13: Citrex610 f-en-citrex vs cloro en camaron
Page 14: Citrex610 f-en-citrex vs cloro en camaron
Page 15: Citrex610 f-en-citrex vs cloro en camaron

Coliforms - 400 ppm CitrexAssay 1 Assay 2

Sample Coliforms E. coli Sample Coliforms E. coli

Sample 1 90 4 Sample 1 90 4

Sample 2 23 4 Sample 2 23 4

Sample 3 4 < 3 Sample 3 4 < 3

Page 16: Citrex610 f-en-citrex vs cloro en camaron

200 ppm Chlorine

Assay 1 Assay 2

Sample Coliforms E. coli Sample Sample E. coli

Sample 1 200 21 Sample 1 200 9

Sample 2 200 3 Sample 2 200 3

Sample 3 200 40 Sample 3 200 9

Page 17: Citrex610 f-en-citrex vs cloro en camaron

Coliform Assays:Only farm shrimp, 400 ppm Citrex (March)

Assay 1 Assay 2

Sample Coliforms E. coli Sample Coliforms E. coli

Sample 1 11 < 3 Sample 1 9 < 3

Sample 2 7 <3 Sample 2 4 <3

Sample 3 3 < 3 Sample 3 11 3

Sample 4 21 3 Sample 4 9 3

Page 18: Citrex610 f-en-citrex vs cloro en camaron

Farm Shrimp - 200 ppm Chlorine

Assay 1 Assay 2

Sample Coliforms E. coli Sample Coliforms E. coli

Sample 1 11 <3 Sample 1 9 4

Sample 2 70 7 Sample 2 15 3

Sample 3 9 3 Sample 3 <3 <3

Sample 4 21 <3 Sample 4 23 11

Page 19: Citrex610 f-en-citrex vs cloro en camaron

GENUS DETERMINATIONGENUS DETERMINATIONSalmonella Salmonella spp. spp.

Page 20: Citrex610 f-en-citrex vs cloro en camaron
Page 21: Citrex610 f-en-citrex vs cloro en camaron
Page 22: Citrex610 f-en-citrex vs cloro en camaron
Page 23: Citrex610 f-en-citrex vs cloro en camaron

Salmonella spp. Research400 ppm Citrex

Assay 1 Assay 2

Sample Salmonella spp. Sample Salmonella spp.

Sample 1 Negative Sample 1 Negative

Sample 2 Negative Sample 2 Negative

Sample 3 Negative Sample 3 Negative

Page 24: Citrex610 f-en-citrex vs cloro en camaron

Sea shrimp - Salmonella 200 ppm chlorine

Assay 1 Assay 2 ID

Sample Salmonella spp.

Sample Salmonella spp.

Sample 1 POSITIVE Sample 1 POSITIVE Salmonella enteritidis

Sample 2 POSITIVE Sample 2 POSITIVE Salmonella enteritidis

Sample 3 Negative Sample 3 Negative

Page 25: Citrex610 f-en-citrex vs cloro en camaron

VIBRIO GENUS RESEARCH

• The genus Vibrio was studied on the samples submitted, using the 101 dilution exhaustion technique. Positive samples and isolated colonies were then biochemically identified.

Page 26: Citrex610 f-en-citrex vs cloro en camaron

Sea shrimp – Vibrio: 400 ppm Citrex

Assay 1 Assay 2

Sample Vibrio spp. Sample Vibrio spp.

Sample 1 Negative Sample 1 Negative

Sample 2 Negative Sample 2 Negative

Sample 3 Negative Sample 3 Negative

Page 27: Citrex610 f-en-citrex vs cloro en camaron

Sea shrimp - Vibrio 200 ppm Chlorine

Assay 1 Assay 2

Sample Vibrio spp. Sample Vibrio spp.

Sample 1 Negative Sample 1 Negative

Sample 2 Negative Sample 2 POSITIVE

Sample 3 Negative Sample 3 Negative

Page 28: Citrex610 f-en-citrex vs cloro en camaron
Page 29: Citrex610 f-en-citrex vs cloro en camaron
Page 30: Citrex610 f-en-citrex vs cloro en camaron

Redución Mesófilos Muestras Enero

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

No muestreos

ufc/

gr

citrex

Cloro

Mesophylls Decrease – January Samples

No. of samplings

Chlorine

Page 31: Citrex610 f-en-citrex vs cloro en camaron

Reducción Mesófilos Muestra Marzo

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

No Muestreos

ufc/

gr

Citrex

cloro

Mesophylls Decrease – March Samples

No. of samplings

Chlorine

Page 32: Citrex610 f-en-citrex vs cloro en camaron

Reducción Coliformes Enero

0

50

100

150

200

250

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

No muestreos

ufc/

g Citrex

Cloro

Coliform Decrease – January

No. of samplings

Chlorine

Page 33: Citrex610 f-en-citrex vs cloro en camaron

Reducción E. coli

05

1015202530354045

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

no muestreos

ufc/

g Cloro

Citrex

E. coli Decrease

No. of samplings

Chlorine

Page 34: Citrex610 f-en-citrex vs cloro en camaron

CONCLUSIONS

• Microbiological studies and further result comparison showed that chlorine solutions had a lower performance (i.e.: they resulted in lower significant decreases of the organisms analyzed).

• More research is needed to further support the disinfectant effect of organic acid complexes like Citrex®.