Citokeratina en Esofago de Barret

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/12/2019 Citokeratina en Esofago de Barret

    1/5

    Cytokeratin Subsets for DistinguishingBarretts Esophagus From Intestinal Metaplasia

    in the Cardia Using Endoscopic Biopsy SpecimensHala M. T. El-Zimaity, M.D., and David Y. Graham, M.D.

    Gastrointestinal Mucosa Pathology Laboratory and Departments of Medicine and Pathology, Veterans

    Affairs Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas

    OBJECTIVES: It has been suggested that Barretts epithelium

    and intestinal metaplasia in the gastric cardia have different

    cyotokeratin (CK) staining patterns and that Barretts epi-

    thelium can be distinguished by CK staining pattern. The

    aim of this study was to test the utility of CK staining fordistinguishing Barretts esophagus from gastric intestinal

    metaplasia.

    METHODS: Topographically mapped gastric biopsy speci-

    mens were obtained from patients without Barretts esoph-

    agus, and esophageal biopsies were obtained from patients

    with long-segment Barretts esophagus (3 cm). Serial

    sections were stained with Genta or El-Zimaity triple stain,

    and biopsies with intestinal metaplasia were stained with

    antibodies against CK 4, 13, 7, and 20.

    RESULTS: Sections from 33 biopsies with Barretts esopha-

    gus, 23 with intestinal metaplasia of the gastric cardia, 27with intestinal metaplasia of the gastric body, and 33 with

    intestinal metaplasia of the antrum were examined. CK 4

    and CK 13 stained squamous epithelium only. The proposed

    diagnostic CK Barretts 7/20 pattern was found in only

    39% of long-segment Barretts compared to 35%, 4%, and

    24% in intestinal metaplasia from the gastric cardia, body,

    and antrum, respectively. The criteria proposed had a sen-

    sitivity of 45% and a specificity of 65%.

    CONCLUSIONS: These results do not support keratin pheno-

    typing as a tool for differentiating intestinal metaplasia

    originating in the cardia from intestinal metaplasia of

    Barretts. (Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:13781382. 2001by Am. Coll. of Gastroenterology)

    INTRODUCTION

    Intestinal metaplasia is a common finding in biopsy speci-

    mens taken from just below the gastroesophageal junction in

    patients with current or past Helicobacter pylori infection

    (15). This finding has prompted considerable discussion

    regarding whether it is a variant of gastroesophageal reflux

    disease (GERD) (6 9), (e.g., short-segment Barretts), a

    consequence ofH. pyloriof the stomach, or both (15).

    Barretts esophagus is considered a premalignant condi-

    tion such that the distinction between H. pylorirelated

    intestinal metaplasia of the cardia and short-segments Bar-

    retts esophagus is important. Recently, Ormsby et al.(10),

    using antibodies to cytokeratin (CK) 7 and CK 20, found

    that the staining pattern of gastric intestinal metaplasia wasentirely different from that of Barretts epithelium. The

    Barretts CK 7/20 pattern was defined as staining of the

    superficial epithelium with CK 20 and staining of both the

    superficial and deep metaplastic epithelium with CK 7. This

    pattern was present in 97% of specimens with long-segment

    Barretts and was not observed in gastric intestinal meta-

    plasia (10). They hypothesized that the Barretts CK 7/20

    pattern was specific for Barretts epithelium.

    The current study was designed to confirm their hypoth-

    esis and to extend the observation to biopsies taken at

    endoscopy by investigating the utility of CK 7, 20, 4, and 13

    in the histological distinction of Barretts esophagus fromintestinal metaplasia in the cardia.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Patients and Histology

    Mucosal biopsy specimens were obtained from patients who

    had previous upper GI endoscopy with gastric mapping

    which typically involved taking 14 biopsies from specified

    sites (11). The anatomic cardia was defined as the mucosa

    immediately below the site of the junction of the mucosa of

    the tubular esophagus and the stomach (Z-line) and above

    the beginning of the first gastric fold. Biopsies of the gastric

    cardia (mean and median of two biopsies) were always

    taken antegrade (not retrograde with retroflexion of the

    endoscope). None of the patients had tongues of gastric type

    epithelium. Each biopsy was placed in a separate bottle of

    10% buffered formalin. Biopsies were embedded on edge,

    sectioned at 5 m with six sections per slide, and stained

    with the Genta stain (12) or El-Zimaity triple stain (13). The

    median size of biopsy specimens (fixed tissue measured on

    a glass slide) was 8 4 mm. Each specimen was reviewed

    by one pathologist and scored using a visual analog scale

    from 0 (absent/normal) to 5 (maximal intensity) for intes-

    tinal metaplasia (14).

    THE AMERICANJOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY Vol. 96, No. 5, 2001 2001 by Am. Coll. of Gastroenterology ISSN 0002-9270/01/$20.00Published by Elsevier Science Inc. PII S0002-9270(01)02355-3

  • 8/12/2019 Citokeratina en Esofago de Barret

    2/5

    Cases were selected because of previously documented

    intestinal metaplasia. Indications for upper GI endoscopy

    included duodenal ulcer, gastric ulcer, and previous diag-nosis of intestinal metaplasia. Cases with previously docu-

    mented long-segment Barretts metaplasia were obtained

    from the files of the Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

    High IronDiamine Staining

    Biopsies with intestinal metaplasia were stained with high

    irondiamine/Alcian blue (HID/AB) to identify neutral,

    sialo-, and sulfomucins. Briefly, slides were immersed in

    HID solution for more than 18 h, at 2325C. Slides were

    then rinsed with deionized water and stained with 1% Alcian

    blue, pH 2.5 for 2 min (15). Subtyping intestinal metaplasia

    was done according to the system used by Jass and Filipe

    (16, 17). Type I is classified as complete intestinal metapla-sia and type II and III are grouped incomplete metaplasia.

    Immunohistochemical Studies

    For immunophenotyping, 5-m thick sections were stained

    using a modified streptavidin-biotin complex method with

    antigen retrieval as required. Briefly, the following reagents

    were used in sequential steps at 36C: inhibitor for endog-

    enous peroxidase, primary antibody for 12 h, biotinylated

    secondary antibody, avidin-biotin complex with horseradish

    peroxidase, 3,3-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride

    (DAB). When indicated, slides were pretreated for antigen

    retrieval by steam for 15 min in a Black and Decker(Schaumburg, IL) steamer in 10 mmol/L citrate buffer (pH

    6.0), followed by cooling for 20 min. Slides were counter-

    stained with hematoxylin. The antibody panel included CK

    7, 20, 4, and 13 from Dako (Carpinteria, CA). After grading

    slides for intensity of stain, intestinal metaplasia glands

    were visually divided into thirds (upper, middle, and lower).

    The staining pattern was considered superficial if the upper

    third or two thirds was positive. Slides were then analyzed

    for the different patterns as defined by Ormsby et al.(10),

    e.g., superficial staining with CK 20 and strong CK 7 stain-

    ing of both superficial and deep glands was defined as a

    Barretts CK7/20 profile. The whole area of metaplasia was

    also screened for patchy or diffuse staining.

    Statistical Analyses

    Scores were analyzed using Sigma Stat (Jandel Scientific

    Software, San Rafael, CA). Fishers exact test or, whenappropriate, the 2 test (both two-tailed) were used for

    comparison of proportions.

    RESULTS

    Intestinal Metaplasia

    A total of 116 biopsies with intestinal metaplasia from 102

    patients were examined (33 Barretts esophagus, 23 cardia,

    27 body, and 33 antral). CK 4 and CK 13 stained squamous

    epithelium only; areas with intestinal metaplasia remained

    unstained. Intestinal metaplasia was incomplete in 79% and

    65% of patients presenting with intestinal metaplasia in the

    esophagus and cardia, respectively.

    Intestinal Metaplasia in Barretts

    A total of 33 biopsies from 29 patients with Barretts esoph-

    agus were examined. The proposed diagnostic CK Barretts

    7/20 as defined by Ormsbyet al.(10) was found in only 39%

    of biopsies (Table 1) (Fig. 1).

    Incomplete intestinal metaplasia was present in 27 biop-

    sies from 23 patients; 11 biopsies had the esophageal pat-

    tern, 12 biopsies had a gastric pattern, and four had other

    patterns. Two patients had multiple biopsies. The first pa-

    tient had two biopsies and both had the esophageal pattern.

    The second patient had four biopsies, one had an esophagealpattern, and three had a gastric pattern.

    Six biopsies from six patients had complete intestinal

    metaplasia. Only three (50%) had the diagnostic Barrett

    pattern.

    Intestinal Metaplasia in the Stomach

    A total of 83 gastric biopsies with intestinal metaplasia were

    examined (23 cardia, 27 body, and 33 antral).

    Intestinal Metaplasia in the Cardia

    In all, 23 biopsies from 18 patients were examined. The

    proposed diagnostic CK Barretts 7/20 pattern as defined

    by Ormsby et al. (10) was found in eight of 23 biopsies

    Table 1. Cytokeratin 7/20 With Barretts Esophagus and Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia, by Site

    DiseaseN

    (biopsies)Barretts CK7/20

    PatternGastric CK7/20

    PatternOther

    Patterns

    Barretts esophagus 33 13 (39%) 15 (15%) 5 (15%)6 complete 2 (33%) 3 (50%) 1 (17%)

    27 incomplete 11 (41%) 12 (44%) 4 (15%)

    Gastric intestinal metaplasiaCardia 23 8 (35%) 7 (30%) 8 (35%)

    8 complete 2 (25%) 1 (13%) 5 (63%)15 incomplete 6 (40%) 6 (40%) 3 (20%)

    Body 27 1 (4%) 7 (26%) 17 (63%)12 complete 0 5 (42%) 7 (58%)11 incomplete 1 (9%) 3 (27%) 7 (64%)

    Antrum 33 8 (24%) 5 (15%) 20 (61%)14 complete 1 (7%) 2 (14%) 11 (79%)19 incomplete 7 (37%) 3 (16%) 9 (47%)

    1379AJG May, 2001 Cytokeratin Subsets in Barretts Versus Stomach

  • 8/12/2019 Citokeratina en Esofago de Barret

    3/5

    (35%), (Table 1). Incomplete intestinal metaplasia was

    present in 15 biopsies from 11 patients. The esophageal

    pattern was present in six (40%) (Fig. 2). Four patients had

    two biopsies each. An esophageal pattern was seen in both

    biopsies in one patient; the second patient had a gastric

    pattern in both biopsies; and two patients had a mixed

    pattern (i.e., one esophageal and one gastric in one patient,

    and one gastric and one other pattern in the other patient).

    Complete intestinal metaplasia was present in eight bi-

    opsies from seven patients. The diagnostic pattern was

    present in two of eight biopsies with complete intestinal

    metaplasia (25%). One patient had two biopsies, one biopsy

    had an esophageal pattern and the other biopsy had super-ficial staining of the glands with CK 7 and CK 20 (other

    pattern).

    Intestinal Metaplasia in the Corpus

    The proposed diagnostic CK Barretts 7/20 pattern as de-

    fined by Ormsby et al. (10) was found in only one of 27

    biopsies (3%) (95% C.I. 0% to 20%) (p 0.0036 com-

    pared to Barretts) (Table 1). The proposed diagnostic CK

    Barretts 7/20 pattern was found in only one of 11 biopsies

    (11 patients) with incomplete intestinal metaplasia. Al-

    though CK 7 stained two cases with incomplete intestinal

    metaplasia in the body, the characteristic Barretts stain-

    ing of the entire length of the gland was observed in one

    patient only. Similarly, complete intestinal metaplasia was

    present in 12 biopsies from 11 patients; none had the Bar-

    retts pattern.

    Intestinal Metaplasia of the Antrum

    The proposed diagnostic CK Barretts 7/20 pattern as de-fined by Ormsbyet al.(10) was found in nine of 33 biopsies

    (27%) (Table 1). Incomplete intestinal metaplasia was

    present in 19 biopsies from 16 patients. Seven biopsies

    (37%) had the esophageal pattern. Three patients had two

    biopsies each. One patient had an esophageal pattern and a

    gastric pattern. The other patient had an esophageal pattern,

    and superficial staining with CK 20 with no staining with

    Figure 1. Representative section for cytokeratins 20 (A) and 7(B) in the esophagus. The proposed diagnostic pattern was observed in only39% of biopsies. Contrary to the proposed diagnostic pattern, CK 20 was expressed in the entire length of the gland in 17 biopsies (59%),and CK 7 was superficial or mixed, with areas of no staining in eight cases (28%).

    Figure 2. Representative section for cytokeratins 20 (A)and 7 (B) in the cardia. The diagnostic cytokeratin Barretts 7/20 was found in35% of biopsies. Superficial staining with CK 20 was observed in 65% of biopsies, and CK 7 stained the entire length of the gland in 52%.

    1380 El-Zimaity et al. AJG Vol. 96, No. 5, 2001

  • 8/12/2019 Citokeratina en Esofago de Barret

    4/5

  • 8/12/2019 Citokeratina en Esofago de Barret

    5/5

    pattern of Helicobacter pylori gastritis in the gastric cardia.Am J Gastroenterol 1997;92:22204.

    3. Goldblum JR, Vicari JJ, Falk GW, et al. Inflammation andintestinal metaplasia of the gastric cardia: The role of gastro-esophageal reflux and H. pylori infection. Gastroenterology1998;114:6339.

    4. el-Serag HB, Sonnenberg A, Jamal MM, et al. Characteristics

    of intestinal metaplasia in the gastric cardia. Am J Gastroen-terol 1999;94:6227.

    5. Craanen ME, Blok P, Dekker W, Tytgat GN. Helicobacterpylori and early gastric cancer. Gut 1994;35:13724.

    6. Voutilainen M, Farkkila M, Juhola M, et al. Specialized co-lumnar epitheilium of the esophagogastric junction: Preva-lence and associations. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:913 8.

    7. Pereira AD, Suspiro A, Chaves P, et al. Short segments ofBarretts epithelium and intestinal metaplasia in normal ap-pearing oesophagogastric junctions: The same or two differententities? Gut 1998;42:65962.

    8. Oberg S, Peters JH, DeMeester TR, et al. Inflammation andspecialized intestinal metaplasia of cardiac mucosa is a man-ifestation of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Ann Surg 1997;

    226:52232.9. Spechler SJ, Zeroogian JM, Antonioli D, et al. Prevalence of

    metaplasia at the gastro-oesophageal junction. Lancet 1994;344:15336.

    10. Ormsby AH, Goldblum JR, Rice TW, et al. Cytokeratin sub-sets can reliably distinguish Barretts esophagus from intesti-nal metaplasia of the stomach. Hum Pathol 1999;30:28894.

    11. El-Zimaity HM, Al-Assi MT, Genta RM, Graham DY. Con-firmation of successful therapy of Helicobacter pyloriinfection: Number and site of biopsies or a rapid urease test.Am J Gastroenterol 1995;90:19624.

    12. Genta RM, Robason GO, Graham DY. Simultaneous visual-ization ofHelicobacter pyloriand gastric morphology: A newstain. Hum Pathol 1994;25:2216.

    13. El-Zimaity HMT, Ota H, Scott S, et al. A new triple stain forHelicobacter pylori suitable for the autostainer. Arch PatholLab Med 1998;122:7326.

    14. El-Zimaity HMT, Graham DY, Al-Assi MT, et al. Interob-server variation in the histopathological assessment of Heli-cobacter pylori gastritis. Hum Pathol 1996;27:35 41.

    15. Spicer SS. Diamine methods for differentiating mucosub-

    stances histochemically. J Histochem Cytochem 1965;13:21134.

    16. Rokkas T, Filipe MI, Sladen GE. Detection of an increasedincidence of early gastric cancer in patients with intestinalmetaplasia type III who are closely followed up. Gut 1991;32:11103.

    17. Silva S, Filipe MI, Pinho A. Variants of intestinal metaplasia

    in the evolution of chronic atrophic gastritis and gastric ulcer.A follow up study. Gut 1990;31:1097104.

    18. Moll R, Franke WW, Schiller DL, et al. The catalog of humancytokeratins: Patterns of expression in normal epithelia, tu-mors and cultured cells. Cell 1982;31:1124.

    19. Petras RE, Sivak MV, Rice TW. Barretts esophagus: A re-view of the pathologists role in diagnosis and management.Pathol Annu 1991;26:132.

    20. Krause WJ, lvey KJ, Baskin WN, et al. Morphological obser-vations on the normal human cardiac glands. Anat Rec 1978;192:5972.

    21. Appelman HD, Kalish RJ, Clancy PE, et al. Distinguishingfeatures of adenocarcinoma in Barretts esophagus and in thegastric cardia. In: Spechler SJ, Goyal RK, eds. Barrettsesophagus: Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management, 3rd

    ed. New York: Elsevier, 1985:16787.22. Ellison E, Hassall E, Dimmick JE. Mucin histochemistry of

    the developing gastroesophageal junction. Pediatr Pathol LabMed 1996;16:195206.

    23. Antonioli DA, Goldman H. Changes in the location and typeof gastric adenocarcinoma. Cancer 1982;50:77581.

    24. Blot WJ, Devesa SS, Kneller RW, et al. Rising incidence ofadenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia. JAMA1991;265:12879.

    25. Pera M, Cameron AJ, Trastek VF, et al. Increasing incidenceof adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastricjunction. Gastroenterology 1993;104:5103.

    26. Craanen ME, Dekker W, Blok P, et al. Time trends in gastriccarcinoma: Changing patterns of type and location. Am J

    Gastroenterol 1992;87:5729.27. Bensley RR. The cardiac glands of mammals. Am J Anat1902;2:10556.

    28. Miyagawa Y. The exact distribution of the gastric glands inman and in certain animals. J Anat 1921;55:5667.

    29. Takubo K, Mafune K, Tanaka Y, et al. Pathology of the cardia.Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 1998;9:54751.

    1382 El-Zimaity et al. AJG Vol. 96, No. 5, 2001