Upload
amena-hardy
View
39
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citizens Advisory Committee. December 10, 2009 Dr. Allan Markley. Purpose. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
December 10, 2009Dr. Allan Markley
PurposeThe CAC mission is to serve as an avenue of
two-way communication with the C-2 Board of Education and the community, to be an active partner with and to advise the C-2 School District and to achieve the most successful school system possible.
Task At HandC-2 Mission and Vision StatementRQS Mission Statement: As a diverse, caring
community, we will ensure all students the opportunity to develop a foundation that empowers them to create their future.
QuestionsDoes the current mission statement address the
current trends of data?Does the current mission statement define the
direction of the school districts purpose for its students?
ProcessReview
The Now Current Mission Statement
Supporting Data of That Time Period Academic Demographics Community Educational Trends
Academic DataAnnual Performance Report (APR)
MAP Index DataACT Advanced CoursesCareer Education CoursesCollege PlacementCareer Education PlacementGraduation RateAttendance RateAdequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
2009 District Summary of Annual Performance Report (APR)4th Cycle
{ Back to: School List | Summary | Data }
District Name: RAYTOWN C-2 County/District Code: 048073
Total Points Earned
GRADE SPAN GRADE LEVEL GRADE SPAN GRADE LEVEL
MSIP Standard/Indi
cator
Status Points
Progress
Points
Status Points
Progress
PointsStatus
Progress
StatusProgre
ssGap
Bonus
Status +
Progress
Points Requir
ed
Met/Not Met
9.1*1 MAP Grades 3-5 Mathematics
Avg =12
A=4 RA=4 3/2=0 @
Avg =24
A=0 RA=0 2/2=0
@
12 4 24 0 Y
Status Total=
36 Status
& ProgressTotal=40
40 Status
50 Status
+ Progress 40 Status
+ Progre
ss + Bonus
=Y
Met
9.1*2 MAP Grades 3-5 Communication Arts
Avg =12
A=12 RA=4 3/2=0
Avg =24
A=8 RA=0 2/2=0
@
12 12 24 8
Status Total=
36 Status
& ProgressTotal=56
40 Status
50 Status
+ Progress 40 Status
+ Progre
ss + Bonus
=Y
Met
9.1*3 MAP Grades 6-8 Mathematics
H2 =16
A=4 RA=4 3/2=0
Avg =24
A=8 RA=8 2/2=0
16 4 24 8 Y
Status Total=
40 Status
& ProgressTotal=52
40 Status
50 Status
+ Progress 40 Status
+ Progre
ss + Bonus
=Y
Met
9.1*4 MAP Grades 6-8 Communication Arts
Avg =12
A=0 RA=0 3/2=0 @
Avg =24
A=8 RA=8 2/2=8
12 0 24 8
Status Total=
36 Status
& ProgressTotal=44
40 Status
50 Status
+ Progress 40 Status
+ Progre
ss + Bonus
=Y
Not Met
Total Points Earned
GRADE SPANGRADE LEVEL
EOC GRADE SPANGRADE LEVEL
EOC
MSIP Standard/Indi
cator
Status Points
Progress
Points
Status Points
Progress
Points**
Status Points
Progress
Points***
StatusProgre
ssStatus
Progress**
StatusProgress***
Status +
Progress
Points Requir
ed
Met/Not Met
9.1*5 EOC Algebra I Mathematics
H2 =10
A=4 RA=2 3/2=0
Avg =22
A=12 RA=0
BA =8 10 4 22 12 8
Status Total=
40 Status
& Progre
ss Total=
56
40 Status
50 Status
+ Progre
ss
Met
9.1*6 EOC English II Communication Arts
H2 =10
A=4 RA=0 3/2=0 @
Avg =22
A=12 RA=0
BA =8 10 4 22 12 8
Status Total=
40 Status
& Progre
ss Total=
56
40 Status
50 Status
+ Progre
ss
Met
BONUS MAP ACHIEVEMENT
Not Met
SCIENCE BONUS POINTS
MSIP Standard/Indicator Status Points Total Points Earned Average
Average
Points Req
Met/Not Met
BONUS POINTS Grade 3-5 Science BA = 2 2
BONUS POINTS Grade 6-8 Science BA = 2 2
BONUS POINTS Biology I Science Avg = 3 3
TOTAL POINTS 7 2.3 3.3Not Met
Total Points EarnedPoints
Required (Minimum)
MSIP Standard/Indicator Status PointsProgress Points
Status Progress
Status +
Progress
Status +
Progress
Met/Not Met
9.3 ACT BA =2 A=2 RA=0 3/2= 0 @
2 2 4 4 Met
9.4*1 Advanced Courses H2 =4 Combined=4
A=2 RA=3 3/2=2
4 3 7 4 Met
9.4*2 Career Education Courses Avg =3 Combined=4
A=2 RA=2 3/2=2
4 2 6 4 Met
9.4*3 College Placement H2 =4 Combined=0
A=2 RA=1 3/2=0 @
4 2 6 4 Met
9.4*4 Career Education Placement Avg =3 Combined=0
A=2 RA=3 3/2=2
3 3 6 4 Met
9.5 Graduation Rate BA =2 A=2 RA=3 3/2=0
2 3 5 4 Met
9.6 Attendance Rate Avg =3 A=0 RA=0 3/2=0
3 0 3 4 Not Met
9.7 Subgroup Achievement F =0 0 NA 0 4 Not Met
Total Standards Met 11 Performance Accreditation Rating
2002-2008 APR’s
02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09
82 73 64 82 11 11 12 11
Map Index DataMissouri Assessment ProgramGRADE SPAN 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 STATUS LND
9.1*1 Grades 3-5 Mathematics 213.0 205.6 199.6 201.1 207.4 205.3
9.1*2 Grades 3-5 Communication Arts 190.7 193.6 190.5 192.7 195.2 192.5
9.1*3 Grades 6-8 Mathematics 163.4 171.2 169.3 170.7 171.4 169.2
9.1*4 Grades 6-8 Communication Arts 196.7 191.6 188.7 184.2 185.8 189.4
9.1*5 Grades 9-11 Mathematics 160.6 163.6 163.9 170.8 163.5 164.5
9.1*6 Grades 9-11 Communication Arts 187.5 190.2 182.7 176.6 183.5 184.1
Missouri Assessment ProgramGRADE LEVEL 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 STATUS LND
9.1*1 Grades 3-5 Mathematics 742.4 744.7 734.6 735.8 739.4
9.1*2 Grades 3-5 Communication Arts 742.7 746.9 737.9 735.8 740.8
9.1*3 Grades 6-8 Mathematics 735.6 730.1 735.6 737.4 734.7
9.1*4 Grades 6-8 Communication Arts 737.0 738.4 744.8 742.7 740.7
9.1*5 Grades 9-11 Mathematics 720.9 720.8 726.4 722.7
9.1*6 Grades 9-11 Communication Arts 732.0 744.1 730.0 735.4
Missouri Assessment ProgramEND-OF-COURSE 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 STATUS LND
9.1*5 Algebra I Mathematics 730.8 730.8
9.1*6 English IICommunication Arts 760.5 760.5
MAP Index DataMissouri Assessment ProgramBONUS ACHIEVEMENT
2008 2009
Number of MAP Standards Evaluated
6 6
Number Demonstrating Improvement
X 2
Percent of MAP Standards Evaluated
33.3 %
Missouri Assessment ProgramGAP BONUS
2008 2009Improveme
nt
9.1*1 Grades 3-5 MathematicsDistrict Minority
716.3 719.0 2.7
State Majority 757.6 758.7 1.1 District Free or Reduce Priced Lunch 716.0 718.8 2.8 State Non Free or Reduce Priced Lunch 767.2 770.2 3.0 9.1*2 Grades 3-5 Communication ArtsDistrict Minority
721.2 721.4 0.2
State Majority 761.6 762.6 0.9 District Free or Reduce Priced Lunch 717.8 717.4 -0.4 State Non Free or Reduce Priced Lunch 773.1 775.8 2.7 9.1*3 Grades 6-8 MathematicsDistrict Minority
711.9 720.6 8.7
State Majority 761.3 764.4 3.1 District Free or Reduce Priced Lunch 715.2 717.9 2.7 State Non Free or Reduce Priced Lunch 770.7 776.5 5.8 9.1*4 Grades 6-8 Communication ArtsDistrict Minority
727.0 728.4 1.4
State Majority 764.7 767.0 2.3 District Free or Reduce Priced Lunch 726.0 725.9 -0.1 State Non Free or Reduce Priced Lunch 774.5 779.3 4.8 9.1*5 Algebra I MathematicsGAP Bonus will not be available for the fourth year of Fourth Cycle9.1*6 English II Communication ArtsGAP Bonus will not be available for the fourth year of Fourth CycleBONUS POINTS Missouri Assessment Program Grade Level and End-of-Course
2008 2009 STATUS LND
Grades 3-5 Science 717.6 724.3 721.0 Grades 6-8 Science 705.6 715.1 710.4 BiologyScience 742.7 742.7
Index Data9.3 ACT 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 STATUSNumber of Graduates
558 572 642 608 611
Number of Graduates Scoring at or Above the National Average on the ACT
141 161 154 160 142
Percent of Graduates Scoring at or Above the National Average on the ACT
25.3 28.1 24.0 26.3 23.2 25.4
9.4*1 Advanced Courses
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 STATUS
Units of Credit Times Enrollment in Approved Advanced Courses
3658.5 3617.5 4928.0 4734.5 5322.0
Grades 11-12 Enrollment Times Credits Possible
9,093 9,695 9,849 9,933 9,632
Percent of Credits Earned in Advanced Courses
40.2 37.3 50.0 47.7 55.3 46.1
9.4*2 Career Education Courses
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 STATUS
Units of Credit Times Enrollment in Approved Career Education Courses
1759.0 1672.5 2121.0 2080.0 2243.0
Grades 11-12 Enrollment Times Credits Possible
9,093 9,695 9,849 9,933 9,632
Percent of Credits Earned in Career Education Courses
19.3 17.3 21.5 20.9 23.3 20.5
Index Data9.4*1 Advanced and 9.4*2 Career Education Courses
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 STATUS
Units of Credit Times Enrollment in Approved Advanced & Career Education Courses
5417.5 5290.0 7049.0 6814.5 7565.0
Grades 11-12 Enrollment Times Credit Possible
9,093 9,695 9,849 9,933 9,632
Percent of Credits Earned in Advanced and Career Education Courses
59.6 54.6 71.6 68.6 78.5 66.6
9.4*3 College Placement
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 STATUS
Number of Graduates Entering College
419 455 241 509 448
Number of Graduates
524 558 572 642 608
Percent of Graduates Entering College
80.0 81.5 42.1 79.3 73.7 71.3
9.4*4 Career Education Placement
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 STATUS
Number of Graduates Completing a Career Education Program
259 226 259 385 372
Number of Graduates Completing a Career Education Program Placed in Occupations Relating to their Training, Attending College, or in the Military
196 159 203 282 342
Percent of Career Education Completers who are Placed
75.7 70.4 78.4 73.2 91.9 77.9
Index Data9.4*3 College Placement & 9.4*4 Career Education Placement
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 STATUS
Number of Graduates Entering College or Placed in an Occupation Related to their Career Education Training or the Military
482 502 298 585 497
Number of Graduates
524 558 572 642 608
Percent College and Career Education Placement
92.0 90.0 52.1 91.1 81.7 81.4
9.5 Graduation Rate
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 STATUS
Number of Graduates
558 572 642 608 611
Cohort Dropouts Plus Graduates
692 705 775 729 695
Graduation Rate 80.6 81.1 82.8 83.4 87.9 83.2 9.6 Attendance Rate
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 STATUS
Grades K-8 94.3 94.0 94.5 94.6 94.9 Grades 9-12 92.7 94.1 92.8 92.9 93.3 Grades K-12 93.8 94.1 94.0 94.1 94.4 94.1 * 9.7 Subgroup Achievement
2009 STATUS
Number of Accountable AYP Subgroups
16
Number of Accountable Subgroups meeting AYP
4
Percent of Subgroups meeting AYP
25.0 25.0
AYP DataMissouri Department of Elementary and Secondary EducationRAYTOWN C-2 (048073 )FINAL Adequate Yearly Progress**
2009 Groups* Met
Communication Arts 8 2
Mathematics 8 2
Required Action: District Improvement Level 3, Corrective Action
Overall Status2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Communication Arts Status Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Mathematics Status Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Met Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Attendance Rate Met Met Met Met
Graduation Rate Met Met Met Not Met
COMMUNICATION ARTS
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Annual Proficiency Target
18.4 19.4 20.4 26.6 34.7 42.9 51.0 59.2 67.4 75.5 83.7 91.8 100.0
School Total (All Kids)
PROF 29.6 * 26.6 *
Y
24.6 * Y
28.3 * Y
40.4 * Y
41.7 * CI
40.2 * NP
42.5 * NP
GROWTH +
PROF PCT
50.6 53.7
LND/PR 0.8 1.3 1.4 0.8 0.6 0.1 0.2 0.2 Asian/Pacific Isl.
PROF 35.7
--
56 --
51.5 * Y
64.2 * Y
52.9 * Y
56.4 * CI
GROWTH +
PROF PCT
55.7 62.8
LND/PR 0 0 0 0 0 0
Black PROF 15.4 * 15.8 *
N
13.1 * N
16.2 * NP
26.9 * NP
28.1 * NP
28.3 * NP
32.4 * NP
GROWTH +
PROF PCT
39.8 45.2
LND/PR 1.2 1.3 0.8 1.1 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.1
Hispanic PROF 17.8 * 22.7 *
N*
15.7 * CI
24.7 * CI
32.4 * CI
29.8 * NP
36.6 * G
39.6 * NP
GROWTH +
PROF PCT
52.5 53.4
LND/PR 0 5.7 2.8 2.7 0.5 0.4 0 1 American Indian
PROF 25 28.6
--
0 --
16.7 --
42.9 --
42.1 --
52.6 --
50 --
White PROF 35.6 * 32 *
Y
31.3 * Y
35.6 * Y
50.9 * Y
54.1 * Y
50.9 * CI
52.3 * G
GROWTH +
PROF PCT
59.7 61.7
LND/PR 0.4 1 1.4 0.6 0.5 0 0.2 0.2 Other/Non-Response
PROF 0 0 --
42.9 --
66.7 --
0 --
13 --
. 0 --
GROWTH +
PROF PCT
. 0
LND/PR 42.9 0 22.2 0 20 0 . 100 F/R Lunch
PROF 17.2 * 16 *
N
13.8 * N
19.6 * NP
27.8 * NP
30.5 * NP
29 * NP
31.9 * NP
GROWTH +
PROF PCT
42.2 46.6
LND/PR 0.9 2.6 1.5 1.3 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.2
IEP PROF 5.9 * 8.8 *
N
8.1 * N
9.9 * NP
17 * NP
18.8 * NP
17.3 * NP
19.7 * NP
GROWTH +
PROF PCT
34.4 37.3
LND/PR 0.5 2.7 3.6 1.7 2.3 0.2 0.6 0.4
LEP PROF 20 8.3
--
0 --
10.5 --
15.2 * SC
11.8 * NP
14 * NP
16 * NP
GROWTH +
PROF PCT
39.8 33.3
LND/PR 0 25 13.3 5 0 1.1 0 3.6
MATHEMATICS 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Annual Proficiency Target
8.3 9.3 10.3 17.5 26.6 35.8 45.0 54.1 63.3 72.5 81.7 90.8 100.0
School Total (All Kids)
PROF 19.4 * 16.4 *
Y
18.5 * Y
19.4 * Y
42.3 * Y
41.7 * Y
40.6 * G
40.1 * NP
GROWTH +
PROF PCT
48.5 49.4
LND/PR 0.6 1.1 0.8 0.7 0.3 0 0.2 0.1 Asian/Pacific Isl.
PROF 29.2
--
30.8 --
59.1 * Y
57.8 * Y
68.4 * Y
63.8 * Y
GROWTH +
PROF PCT
72.4 73.9
LND/PR 0 0 0 0 0 0
Black PROF 9.7 * 5.5 *
N
6.2 * N
8.5 * NP
26.5 * CI
26.5 * NP
26.6 * NP
28.2 * NP
GROWTH +
PROF PCT
36.1 39.1
LND/PR 0.2 0.6 0.6 0.9 0.3 0 0.3 0.1
Hispanic PROF 15.7 * 14.8 *
N*
19 * Y
13.8 * CI
38.3 * Y
30 * CI
36.9 * G
36.5 * NP
GROWTH +
PROF PCT
46.6 45.6
LND/PR 3.8 7.6 1.2 1.2 0 0 0.3 0 American Indian
PROF 22.2 12.5
--
0 --
25 --
47.8 --
45.5 --
50 --
30.8
White PROF 23.2 * 21.9 *
Y
25.4 * Y
26.4 * Y
54.4 * Y
55.3 * Y
53.7 * Y
52 * CI
GROWTH +
PROF PCT
59.7 59.9
LND/PR 0.5 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0 0.2 0.1
Other/Non-Response
PROF 0 0 --
40 --
0 --
0 --
6.3 --
. 0 --
GROWTH +
PROF PCT
. 0
LND/PR 16.7 0 0 0 0 0 . 100
F/R Lunch
PROF 11.6 * 10.3 *
Y
12.3 * Y
12.2 * NP
30 * Y
30.8 * NP
29.8 * NP
30.6 * NP
GROWTH +
PROF PCT
38.7 42.1
LND/PR 0.7 1.4 0.6 0.3 0.4 0 0.3 0
IEP PROF 5.9 * 4.7 *
N
7.5 * CI
11 * NP
23.4 * CI
22.3 * NP
23.1 * NP
26 * NP
LEP PROF 12.5 7.7
--
12.5 --
5.3 --
12.3 * SC
13.9 * NP
17.3 * NP
14.9 * NP
GROWTH +
PROF PCT
33.7 27.7
LND/PR 0 13.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 ADDITIONAL INDICATOR--ATTENDANCE RATE 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
School Total (All Kids)
94.3 *
Met
94 * Met
94.5 * Met
94.6 * Met
94.9 * Met
ADDITIONAL INDICATOR--GRADUATION RATE 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
School Total (All Graduates)
80.5 * Met Y
81.1 * Met Y
82.7 * Met Y
83.5 * Met Y
78.1 * Not Met
Demographic DataEnrollment/Staff Data
Preschool EnrollmentK-12 EnrollmentFree/Reduced PercentagesDropout RateGraduate DestinationStaffing RatiosCertification Status of TeachersYears of Experience of Professional Staff
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Missouri 11,604 14,366 18,006 21,411 22,692
RAYTOWN C-2
166 173 121 173 128
Definition | More Data |
(2) Preschool Enrollment
Missouri 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Total 896,186 894,809 899,941 899,525 894,609
Asian 1.4% 1.5% 1.6% 1.7% 1.8%
Black 17.9% 17.9% 18.1% 18.1% 18.0%
Hispanic 2.5% 2.8% 3.1% 3.4% 3.6%
Indian 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4%
White 77.8% 77.4% 76.8% 76.4% 76.2%
RAYTOWN C-2 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Total 8,570 8,664 8,765 8,742 8,720
Asian 1.3% 1.4% 1.5% 1.9% 1.9%
Black 34.3% 36.9% 39.6% 41.1% 42.8%
Hispanic 4.3% 4.7% 5.3% 6.1% 6.7%
Indian 0.4% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.4%
White 59.7% 56.4% 53.1% 50.4% 48.1%
(3) K-12 Enrollment
Missouri 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Percent 40.5% 41.7% 40.8% 41.8% 42.1%
Number 354,534 364,441 367,461 366,547 367,724
RAYTOWN C-2
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Percent 37.8% 39.7% 40.8% 43.9% 46.2%
Number 3,227 3,431 3,506 3,756 4,022
(5) Students Eligible for Free or Reduced-Price Lunch
Missouri 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Total 3.3 3.6 4.0 3.7 4.2
Asian 1.1 1.5 1.9 2.4 2.3
Black 5.0 5.8 7.4 6.6 9.0
Hispanic 5.1 4.8 5.8 7.0 6.9
Indian 3.5 4.9 6.1 4.5 3.7
White 2.9 3.1 3.2 3.0 3.1
RAYTOWN C-2 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Total 3.5 4.6 4.4 3.1 3.4
Asian 0.0 0.0 4.5 3.3 0.0
Black 2.7 4.5 4.6 2.6 3.5
Hispanic 4.3 1.6 2.4 2.1 5.9
Indian 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 11.4
White 4.0 5.1 4.3 3.7 3.1
(7) Dropout Rate
Missouri 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Entering a 4yr. College/University
38.6 38.2 39.4 39.4 39.9
Entering a 2yr. College
26.7 26.5 25.8 26.2 26.8
Entering a Postsecondary (Technical) Institution
4.1 4.4 4.3 4.0 3.5
RAYTOWN C-2 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Entering a 4yr. College/University
48.8 39.5 37.6 25.0 32.7
Entering a 2yr. College
34.6 31.9 39.4 15.0 45.0
Entering a Postsecondary (Technical) Institution
3.90 8.60 4.50 2.10 1.60
Definition | More Data |
(8) Where Our Graduates Go
Missouri 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Students to classroom teachers
19 19 18 18 18
Students to administrators
206 204 203 197 189
RAYTOWN C-2 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Students to classroom teachers
21 19 19 19 19
Students to administrators
192 198 204 188 187
(10) Staffing Ratios
Missouri 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Teachers with Regular Certificates
96.9% 97.4% 97.1% 97.0% 97.0%
Temporary or Special Assignment Certificates
1.6% 1.7% 1.8% 1.9% 1.8%
Substitute, Expired or No Certificate
1.5% 1.0% 1.1% 1.1% 1.2%
Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers
95.3% 96.4% 96.7% 96.8% 96.4%
RAYTOWN C-2 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Teachers with Regular Certificates
97.1% 96.6% 98.3% 98.1% 97.3%
Temporary or Special Assignment Certificates
0.9% 1.2% 0.9% 1.5% 2.2%
Substitute, Expired or No Certificate
2.0% 2.2% 0.9% 0.5% 0.5%
Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers
94.8% 95.7% 98.1% 98.5% 98.6%
(11) Certification Status of Teachers
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Missouri 12.9 12.8 12.6 12.6 12.4
RAYTOWN C-2
12.3 11.2 10.5 9.5 9.1
(12) Years of Experience of Professional Staff
Demographic DataDemographic Data, 2005-2009
RAYTOWN C-2 MissouriYear 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Total Enrollment
8,664 8,765 8,742 8,720 8,622 894,809 899,941 900,781 895,833 892,279
Asian (Number|Percent)
1251.4
1301.5
1621.9
1701.9
1681.9
13,059 1.5
14,169 1.6
15,023 1.7
15,814 1.8
16,511 1.9
Black (Number|Percent)
3,19636.9
3,47239.6
3,59741.1
3,72842.8
3,88245.0
160,618 17.9
162,895 18.1
162,743 18.1
160,507 17.9
159,066 17.8
Hispanic (Number|Percent)
4114.7
4625.3
5346.1
5886.7
6257.2
25,166 2.8
27,935 3.1
30,464 3.4
32,500 3.6
33,994 3.8
Indian (Number|Percent)
460.5
460.5
450.5
390.4
320.4
3,444 0.4
3,640 0.4
3,739 0.4
3,913 0.4
3,952 0.4
White (Number|Percent)
4,88656.4
4,65553.1
4,40450.4
4,19548.1
3,91545.4
692,522 77.4
691,302 76.8
688,812 76.5
683,088 76.3
678,756 76.1
Free/Reduced Lunch (FTE)* (Number|Percent)
3,431.0039.7
3,506.0040.8
3,756.0043.9
4,022.0046.2
4,214.1049.4
364,441 41.7
367,462 40.8
366,547 41.8
367,720 42.1
380,376 43.7
ProcessReview
The Now Current Mission Statement
Supporting Board Goals Building Goals Academic Demographics Community Educational Trends (Current Research)
Where Were We?Mission Statement
RQS Mission Statement: As a diverse, caring community, we will ensure all students the opportunity to develop a foundation that empowers them to create their future.
QuestionsDoes the current mission statement address the
current trends of data?Does the current mission statement define the
direction of the school districts purpose for its students?
Raytown Quality SchoolsMSIP Accreditation as of July 2009 RAYTOWN C-2 school district is: Accredited
Number of Missouri Districts Accredited 512 (97.9%) Provisionally 8 ( 1.5%) Interim 1 ( 0.2%) Unaccredited 2 ( 0.4%) Source: Missouri Dept. of Elementary and
Secondary Education Core Data As Submitted by Missouri Public Schools
Table Updated July 6, 2009
Tonight’s AgendaGroup Data Review
Number 1-7Handouts
Does the current mission statement address the academic needs of our students?
Group DiscussionCommittee DebriefNext Meeting, February 18, 2010 6:00 p.m.
Raytown Demographics
I Have Changed My MindImagine That!Debriefing
Homework AssignmentGroup Reporter Provide Group Answers To Me
Via E-Mail, I Will Distribute To [email protected]
Where Were We?Mission Statement
RQS Mission Statement: As a diverse, caring community, we will ensure all students the opportunity to develop a foundation that empowers them to create their future.
QuestionsDoes the current mission statement address the
current trends of data?Does the current mission statement define the
direction of the school districts purpose for its students?
Tonight’s AgendaGroup Data Review
Group DiscussionCommittee Debrief
Raytown DemographicsNext Meeting
March 25, 2010, 6:00 p.m.
Raytown1990-2000See Handouts
What is Obvious?How Does the Current Mission Statement
Connect With the Data?
Raytown School Data 2005-2009
See HandoutWhat Are the Correlations With the Prior Data?Can we Connect our Current Mission
Statement?
Mission StatementGroups
Task Using Given Data, Each Group Will Write a New
Mission Statement for the District If Necessary, Write a Vision Statement That
Supports Your Mission StatementCompare Statements
Recommendation to the Board of Education
DATADemographic Trends
EthnicitySpecial EducationSocioeconomicDiscussion
Decision TimeGroup Work
Number 1-4Write a Mission Statement Based on Prior Data
If Necessary, Write 1-2 Vision Statements in Support
Compare Group Work Look for Commonalities
Final ProductRecommendation To Board Of Education
April 26, 2010