Citadel…on the MoveKick-of Meeting

1 February 2012Ghent, Belgium

Welcome and introduction of Partners

Karl-Filip Coenegrachts (City of Ghent)Geert Mareels (CORVE)

The CITADEL team• 1. CORVE (Flemish Region)

– Geert Mareels (eGovernment manager), Hans Arents, Jessica Van den Dries, Katrien De Smet, Jan Godderis

– External support by 21c (Julia Glidden, Susie Ruston)– WP1 and 2 lead

• 2. IS-practice– Hugo Kerschot– Project management

• 3. City of Ghent (Gent)– Karl-Filip Coenegrachts, Jelle Monstrey, Katrien Van

Goidsenhoven, Peter De Bock, Bart Rosseau– WP5 lead

• 4. Issy Media (Issy-les-Moulineaux)– Eric Legale, Catalina Vasilescu, Sébastien Levy

• 5. Manchester City Council (Manchester)– John Keys

• 6. DAEM (Athens)– Yannis Ramfos, Ira Giannakoudaki, Dimitra Tsakanika

• 7. Intrasoft International– Christos Georgousopoulos, Vasilis Koutsiouris– WP4 lead

• 8. Alfamicro– Alvaro Oliveira, Jean Barroca, Jesse Marsh, Francesco

Molinari– WP3 lead

• 9. IBBT– Shenja Van der Graaf, Bram Lievens– WP6 lead

• 10. ITEMS– Hervé Rannou, Sébastien Bachollet

• 11. ASTON University– Lim Ming

• 12. Fondation Euractive– Daniel Van Lerberghe– WP7 lead

• 13. Global Cities Dialogue– .

• 14. V-ICT-OR– Eddy Van der Stock, Raf Buyle, Ivan Stuer, Goedele

Van der Spiegel– Supported by SOCITM: Martin Ferguson

• 15. ATC– Yannis Kliafas, Eva Jaho, Leonidas Kallipolitis

The CITADEL team: CORVE (1)

• Who are we?– Flemish E-government administration – Built data sharing platform between federal, Flemish

and local administrations (MAGDA)– Initiators of the “Citadel Statement in December

2010• What’s our input in the CITADEL team?

– Coordinator– Monitoring progress of the project, dealing with

finances, reporting and administration.

The CITADEL team: IS-practice (2)

• Who are we?– Long-time experience in eGovernment and

Information Society projects– Local, national, EU level experience

• What’s our input in the CITADEL team?– Day-to-day project management– Back-up for the Coordinator

The CITADEL team: Ghent (3)

• Who are we?– Department of Strategy & Coordination / Team e-

Strategy• What’s our input in the CITADEL team?

– Experience with Open data on the local level (Apps for Ghent)

– Ghent Living Lab

The CITADEL team: ISSY MEDIA (4)

• Who are we?Issy Media, a public-private company in charge of the communication and the development of ICT in the city of Issy-les-Moulineaux. → Print and Web publications, press relations, management of special events and billposting. → Co-ordinating the ICT-projects of Issy since 1995.

• What’s our input in the CITADEL team?→ Pilot city in which public data from the cultural domain will be made available to stimulate the creation of shared services and applications.→ Liaison with local government data providers to help make government data openly available for use.→ End-user involvement and engagement to access collective knowledge and information→ Promotion and dissemination of the project findings to other cities administrations/decision makers and SMEs, at local, national and international level

The CITADEL team: MCC (5)Who are we?Manchester Digital Development Agency (MDDA) is part of Manchester City Council and works with a wide range of local, national and international partners from the government, academic, business and community sectors. MDDA Co-ordinates the Manchester Living Lab and information society initiatives across the Greater Manchester city‐region including community-based digital inclusion, next generation access (NGA) broadband and smart energy projects. Overall our role is to support the regeneration of the city-region through the strategic and practical work of our technology-focused projects.

John Keys – Project Officer

What’s MDDA’s input in the CITADEL team?WP2 - Policy and Business Requirements

T2.1 Current Situation Analysis – MCC will provide relevant information to the WP lead. WP3 – Open Access and Data Management

T3.1: Management of Open Data Governance Groups – To set up a local OD Governance Group and coordinate the on-going work of the Governance Group.T3.3 Privacy Impact Assessments - To carry out a local Privacy Impact Assessment.T3.4 Semantic Framework Agreement – Contribute to the development of the Semantic Framework Agreement.T3.5 Open Data Commons Repository - To support the creation of the Open Data Commons Repository.

WP4 - Innovation and Pilot PreparationT4.1 Scenario Development – Participate in the Internal workshop and host a scenario event.T4.2 User Requirements Gathering – To invite relevant stakeholders & host some of the meetings.T4.3 Technical Requirements Development - Revise Technical Specs and provide feedback.T4.4 Future Proofing with Geo-based technologies (IOT) – Support Co-ordinator of this task.T4.5 Template Mobile Applications Creation - Validate and provide Technology partners with feedback .T4.6 Testing and Review - Test & review the Template Mobile Apps.

WP5 - Opening up the Pilot SitesT5.1 Deployment Planning – To support the development of the deployment plan.T5.2 Closed User Group - To lead on MCC’s service trial .T5.3 Open User Group – To be part of the approval committee & support the Open User Group.T5.4 Shared Services Validation – To select and adopt one of the test applications to demonstrate proof of concept.

WP6 - Analysis and EvaluationT6.1 Evaluation planning – To support the development of the evaluation process and plan.T6.2 Collation of results – Collect and make available to the WP lead the evaluation data from MCC’s pilot.

WP7 – Dissemination and ExploitationT7.3 Dissemination activities - To undertake agreed dissemination activities.

The CITADEL team: DAEM (6)• Who are we?

- City of Athens IT Company-Mission: to develop eGovernment systems so as to support Municipality of Athens and other local government organisations-clients by providing integrated IT services-Areas of expertise: software development & engineering, integrated IT solutions development, IT infrastructure development (networks, systems etc), personnel & end-users training, technical support & maintenance services, National/E.U co-funded projects

• What’s our input in the CITADEL team?– Initiating Open data at the local level, providing access to

existing and suggesting more to become available– Open Governance groups and Service scenarios

The CITADEL team: INTRASOFT (7)• Who are we?

– Established in 1996. Member of INTRACOM Group of companies– We are established in 5 countries (Greece, Luxembourg, Belgium, Romania, Egypt), we have

Long-term operations in 10 countries (Greece, Luxembourg, Belgium, Romania, Egypt, UK, Holland, Spain, Germany, Portugal), and projects in most EU Countries (UK, Lithuania, Latvia, Denmark, Portugal, Norway, Ireland, Sweden, Cyprus, …)

– We have a Strong niche in public sector, specialising in services to EU Public Organisations (EU & National institutions) , as well as in the provision of (i) application development, (ii) information and communication services, (iii) outsourcing and managed services, (iv) professional services

– We are a multicultural team of 800 professionals operating out of 5 sites (Belgium, Luxembourg, Greece, Romania, Egypt), with a revenue of 90M in 2010

• What’s our input in the CITADEL team?– Contributor in WP3: ‘Open Access and Data Management’ – Leader and major contributor in WP4: ‘Innovation and Pilot Preparation’

– Responsible for the development of the project’s portal in the context of WP7: ’Dissemination and Exploitation’

– Support in Piloting activities (WP5:’Opening up the Pilot Sites’ & WP6:’Analysis and

Evaluation’)

The CITADEL team: Alfamicro (8)• Who are we?

– ALFAMICRO was founded in 1983, with the objective to do research, consultancy and engineering services to support advanced re-engineering and integrated IT solutions.

– Nowadays, Alfamicro is mainly devoted in applying Living Lab and User Behaviour Transformation methodologies to different sustainability scenarios, such as Energy Efficiency or the Smart Cities challenges of our times.

– Alfamicro currently coordinates two CIP European Projects: Save Energy and PERIPHÈRIA.

– At this moment, we are involved in three CIP Smart Cities Portfolio Projects: CitySDK, Citadel and PERIHÈRIA.

• What’s our input in the CITADEL team?– Alfamicro leads WP3– Connection to the the Living Lab community namely through the European

Network of Living Labs

The CITADEL team: IBBT (9)• Who are we?

– Interdisciplinary Institute for BroadBand Technology, a virtual research centre located in Flanders/Belgium

– Mainly demand-driven research within 5 domains: Digital society, Future Health, Future Media & Imaging, Future Internet, Security

– Develop and test environment: Living Lab expertise centre, Technical Lab– Stimulating entrepreneurship

• What’s our input in the CITADEL team?– WPLead WP6– Assist the local pilots

• Provide methodology• Coordinate and steer collation process• Evaluation framework• Validation

The CITADEL team: ITEMS (10)• Who are we?

– Expert SMEs• Specialized in strategy, marketing and international think-tank fora in the area of ICT• Market definition and opportunities, strategic studies for organization public and private• Organization of Conference with international experts in Technology, Sociology, Economy

– Hervé Rannou, CEO– Sébastien Bachollet, Consultant Manager

• What’s Items input in the CITADEL team?– WP2: Policy and Business Requirements

• T2.1 Current Situation Analysis– ITEMS will provide input to CORVE

» Each of the Pilot Cities will provide information for their country.

• T2.2 Shared Standards Planning– CORVE and ITEMS will led the planning process with support from, ASTON and VIC.

• T2.3 Creating Common Standards/Guidance for Using Open Data and Mobile Technology to Create Public Services

– CORVE, ITEMS, ASTON and VIC will lead the deployment of this task and will coordinate with all the other work packages as appropriate.

– WP7: Dissemination and Exploitation • T7.4 Market Analysis and business case development

– ITEMS will support FEAP leader of this task 1 February 2012

Ghent, Belgium

The CITADEL team: ASTON (11)

• Who are we?– Dr Ming Lim - currently leading RFID Advanced

Research and Lecturer in Logistics at Aston University (UK)

• What’s our input in the CITADEL team?– Data standardisation and management – Future proofing of geo-based technology (IOT) – Development of mobile application template

The CITADEL team: FOAP (12)

• Who are we?– Fondation EurActiv PoliTech– Part of the EurActiv Network– 1st Online EU Policy Media Network– EurActiv Network in 15 countries in 15 languages– 609000 Readers

• What’s our input in the CITADEL team?– WP7 Leader

The CITADEL team: GCD (13)

• Who are we?– …

• What’s our input in the CITADEL team?– ….

The CITADEL team: V-ICT-OR (14)

• Flemish ICT Organisation – ICT-professionals of the local authorities in Flanders– Representing LOLA (worldwide)– EU-Partners: SOCITM (UK), VIAG (NL), KOMMITS (SE)

• Expertise & Focus– In-depth knowledge of Local Authorities

• Role: – Benchmarking & Standardization– Dissemination & mainstreaming

The CITADEL team: ATC (15)• Who are we?

– ATC is an IT solutions and services provider (SME) , based in Athens, Greece– Sectors:

• Media, Banking, Retail sectors, Public sector organizations

– Range of IT solutions:• content management, human capital resource management, ERP, eLearning, web

and mobile applications.

– Expertise :• 21 years in R&D and technology transfer projects

• What’s our input in the CITADEL team?• Main involvement in WP4 Innovation and Pilot Preparation:• T4.3: Technical requirements development• T4.4: Future proofing with Geo-based technologies• T4.5: Technical implementation of the template mobile applications

Agenda for today

Hugo Kerschot (IS-practice)

The CITADEL project• WP1 Project and Quality Management

– CORVE and IS-practice– All partners

• WP2 Policy and Business Requirements– CORVE, IS-practice and all pilot cities (Gent, Issy, Manchester, Athens)– ITEMS, Aston, FEAP, GCD an V-ICT-OR

• WP3 Access data management– Alfamicro– All partners (ex. IBBT)

• WP4 Innovation and pilot preparation– Intrasoft– CORVE, all pilot cities, Alfa, IBBT, Aston, FEAP, GCD, ATC

• WP5 Opening up the pilot sites– City of Ghent– Other pilot cities, CORVE, Intrasoft, Alfa, IBBT, ITEMS, Aston, FEAP, ATC

• WP6 Analysis and evaluation– IBBT– CORVE, Pilot cities, Intrasoft, Aston, FEAP, V-ICT-OR, ATC

• WP7 Dissemination, exploitation– Fondation Euractiv– CORVE, IS-practice, Pilot cities, Intrasoft, ITEMS, GCD, V-ICT-OR, ATC

Agenda (1)08.30h Welcome coffee09:00h Welcome address and introduction of Partners

Karl-Filip Coenegrachts (City of Ghent), Geert Mareels (CORVE)09:20h Agenda of the day

Hugo Kerschot (IS-practice)09:25h Introduction to project administration and management

Hugo Kerschot (IS-practice)09:45h Citadel on the Move Vision

Geert Mareels (CORVE)10:00h CITADEL Vision: interactive session (first project deliverable)

Susie Ruston/Julia Glidden (CORVE)10.45h COFFEE BREAK11:00h Introduction to WP2 – Policy and business requirements

Susie Ruston/Julia Glidden (CORVE)11:15h Introduction to WP3 – Open Access and Data Management

Jean Barocca/Jesse March (Alfamicro)11:30h Introduction to WP4 – Innovation and Pilot Preparation

Christos Georgousopoulos (Intrasoft)11:15h Introduction to WP7 –Dissemination and Exploitation

Daniel Van Lerberghe (FEAP)12:00h LUNCH

Agenda (2)14:00h 2 parallel sessions:

A) WP2 – Policy and Business Requirements (CORVE/V-ICT-OR)T2.1 – Current Situation AnalysisD2.1 - Current Situation Analysis: Benchmarking report outlining the current state of open data policy and use in Europe. [due m2]T2.2- Shared Standards Planning – common approachD2.2 – Standard Development Strategy: Plan Team will follow to develop common standards [due m4]

B) WP3 & WP4 – Open Access and Data Management (Alfamicro) Innovation and Pilot Preparation (Intrasoft)

T3.1 - Management of Open Data Governance GroupsD3.1 - Open Data City Charters Iteration 1: Common open data agreement for the project in the four pilot cities. [due m4]T3.2 - Citadel Open Data CharterT4.1 -Scenario DevelopmentD4.1 - Scenario Specifications: Report provide a baseline on the existing levels of smart service delivery across Europe, as well as outlining the potential service applications in transport and tourism fields [due m3]T4.2 - User Requirements GatheringD4.2 - User Requirements: This deliverable will document and consolidate the results from the organization of the workshops in the form of user requirements and needs. [due m6]

16:00h COFFEE BREAK

Agenda (3)16:15h Feedback and action points from the parallel sessions

- Reporting Visioning session and WP2 tasks (20min)Susie Ruston/Julia Glidden (CORVE)

- Reporting parallel session WP3 (20 min)Jesse March (Alfamicro)

- Reporting parallel session WP4 (20min)Christos Georgousopoulos (Intrasoft)

17:15h Formal “General Assembly”Contract and payments, Proposal for Consortium agreement, consortium bodies and chain of decision, Consortium, Other business: Next GA, …(Geert Mareels)

17:45h Conclusions of the day:What’s next: agenda for next meetings, agreements on

reporting and communication (15min)Geert Mareels (CORVE) Hugo Kerschot (IS-practice)

18:00h END of meeting

Introduction to project administration and management(WP1)

Hugo Kerschot (IS-practice)

Project administration and management

Project Director Project Manager

Timing

Overview WP1

Project management tools

• Project management plan (D1.2, due M3)• Quality plan (D1.3, due M4)• Gantt chart (planning tasks and

deliverables/milestones)• MyBBT online workspace• Other communication tools: mails, conf. calls..• Consortium management structure (cfr. CA)

Partners

Overall Innovation Lead

CORVE

Open Data and Standards

ITEMS

Pilot 4: GreeceDAEM

Pilot 2: FranceIM

Pilot 1: BelgiumGHENT

Pilot 3: UKMCC

Common Data Formats

ALFA

IOT SupportASTON

Mobile Application Templates

INTRAS

Technology & R&D

Specialists

Other Living Labs Projects

National and European

Policy Makers

Citizens and Wider EU

Stakeholders

European Cities and Regions

Business and Sustainability

Experts

Existing Smart Cities

Consortium Links

Dissemination & Exploitation

FEAP

City and Living Lab Networks

GCD / IBBT

CIO Networks VIC

Living Labs, and Smart City Pilot

Sites

Platform Technology

Partners

CIT

AD

EL

C

ON

SO

RT

IUM

Coordination & Project MgmtCORVE/ISP

Evaluation & Results

IBBT

Management and Coordination Partners

Citadel HubATC

Open Data Advisory Panel

Andrew Stott, Richard

Kerby and Ahmad Ismail

Policy Partners

Dissemination and Exploitation

Partners

www.mybbt.be

Project management tools

• Project management plan (D1.2, due M3)• Quality plan (D1.3, due M4)• Gantt chart (planning tasks and

deliverables/milestones)• MyBBT online workspace• Other communication tools: mails, conf. calls..• Consortium management structure (cfr. CA)

Consortium management structure

• Base on Consortium Agreement• Reflected in PM plan• Starting point:

– General assembly (all partners represented, in GA terminology “project board”)

– Day-to-day: Steering Committee (Coordinator and project management)

– In between: Management board= Steering Com with all WP leads

• WP-lead is responsible for the management and the delivery of his WP

“CITADEL on the move…” VISION

Geert Mareels(CORVE)

Challenge

Malmo Declaration(2009)

Citadel Statement

(2010)

Citadel on the Move Project

(2011 – 2014)

eGovernment Vision Identification of Practical Steps Making the Vision Real

1

2

3

1

2

3

1

2

3

eGov services around citizens needs

Better access to information

Active citizen involvement

Common architecture, shared services and standards

Open data, transparency and personal rights

Citizen participation and involvement

TECHNOLOGY: mobile apps accessed easily and used anywhere

DATA: Open access data in common formats

INNOVATION: citizen created smart services

TECHNOLOGY

Facilitate development and use of smart mobile applications that can potentially be used anywhere by: Deploying a mobile web approach (based on HTML5) that will allow applications to be used on most

handsets Addressing IOT/geo-location developments that provide advanced, value-added data sharing

mechanisms

INNOVATION

Help unleash the full potential of Open Innovation Systems by: Developing template mobile web applications that can be used by ‘citizen developers’ to create their

own applications Using the Living Lab methodology to help ‘citizen developers’ understand and use these templates

DATA

Empower ‘citizen developers’ to create the type of ‘smart city’ services they want and need by: Creating and promoting the use of a common method for aggregating, transforming and publishing

government data from differing sources into a more easily accessible format Providing an easy way to link the use of mobile web app templates and "open access data" for use by

developers and ‘citizen developers’ alike

Objectives

Proposition

Open Data

Policy, Standard

formats and Business

Requirements and App

Templates

Dissemination Techniques

Government publishes Open Data with help of Citadel

Citadel (a) use’s Living Labs, Open Data Groups, Mobile App Communities to create and refine the solution, and

(b) markets availability of open data and application templates to its networks and provides support to users

where neccessary

Citadel Living Labs develop application Templates and investigate future proofing

Citadel Hub and open platforms – facilitating access to data and templates

End Users

New Mobile App New Mobile App New Mobile App

Governments Citizens (Developers/SME’s)

Smart Cities

Citizens access data and templates to develop new mobile applications – published

where citizens choose

Citizens able to deliver the services they want

and need.

Citadel unlocks new ways of interpreting information

Rapid innovation means a better range of services improving quality of life

in Cities

New partnerships with citizens to offer better end products/services

Template Applications (HTML5)

Europe as a Whole

Standardise access formats for open data to

help promote future shared services

Citadel Consortium Activity

Future Proofing Using IOT

Citadel…on the Move will use the Living

Lab approach to engage end-users/citizens

in the creation of innovative new mobile

applications in the pre-agreed areas of

transportation and tourism. In so doing,

Citadel…on the Move will help to bolster

the creation and use of shared, citizen-

generated mobile applications by using

open source / open platform technologies

for applications that can be built using

open access data.

To achieve key objectives, Citadel…on the Move will target three distinct communities of stakeholders – at the

city, national and European levels - to help 1) co-create & beta test and 2) market & push:

• Open Data Communities

• Mobile Application Communities

• Smart City/Living Lab Communities

Proposition

Pilot

Provide way for Gov to easily publish and

Citizens to easily access open data

Create html5 Templates for

applications for citizens to use to create own apps

Use geo-location technology in

apps to enable shared smart

services

Innovative Citadel Elements

Disseminate to innovation

ecosystems, cities, living labs, gov and

citizens using extensive Citadel

Network

Delivers open innovation for

Internet enabled services in Smart

Cities

Open Validation End Result

Open Data Innovation Technology

Pilot City Service Area Potential Areas of Focus

Ghent Tourism Services provided near transport hubs like railway stations

Issy-les-Moulineaux

Manchester Transport Environmental data about communities and neighbourhoods

Athens

Benefits of the Citadel…on the Move open innovation approach for cities are:

• Agility improves with opening up data to enable users' to rapidly and inexpensively create mobile

applications that cover public service gaps and needs – innovation at the speed of life!

• Costs for delivering public services may be greatly reduced as citizens contribute talent to R&D for free

• Device and location independence enables users to access systems using a web browser regardless of

their location or what ever handheld device they are using (e.g., iPhone, Android, Blackberry etc.)

• Scalability increased as all citizens can potentially create public services without the need for highly

skilled programmers, plus innovations can be shared across cities

• Economic growth & innovation as the power of Open Data enables SMEs to create new market

products

• Added value delivered through the sharing of new innovative services between cities – mobile service

apps that work anywhere

Outcomes

CITADEL Vision, Interactive Session

Julia Glidden, Susie Ruston

T1.1 Project Visioning• This task will focus on identifying the vision of what the project should achieve so the

Team has a clear view of the future scenario to work towards.

• It involves the organisation of an interactive session during the project Kick-Off meeting.

• This session will try to draw out the expectations and help the diverse participating groups to make the initial steps towards a common understanding.

• This interactive session is expected to be repeated annually, so that the project vision is revisited and up-to-date addressing any future challenges.

• Participating Partners: CORVE will lead the visioning workshop at the kick off meeting and will ensure the vision document is updated annually. All partners will be required to participate in this process. ISP, as project support will use the vision document to help measure progress. FEAP as the Dissemination lead will use the output in WP7 to help describe the project to stakeholders.

Visioning Exercise

“Imagine that it is 2015 and Citadel...on the Move has just finished. What are the desired project outcomes that you would need/expect?”

TECHNOLOGY

Facilitate development and use of smart mobile applications that can potentially be used anywhere by: Deploying a mobile web approach (based on HTML5) that will allow applications to be used on most

handsets Addressing IOT/geo-location developments that provide advanced, value-added data sharing

mechanisms

INNOVATION

Help unleash the full potential of Open Innovation Systems by: Developing template mobile web applications that can be used by ‘citizen developers’ to create their

own applications Using the Living Lab methodology to help ‘citizen developers’ understand and use these templates

DATA

Empower ‘citizen developers’ to create the type of ‘smart city’ services they want and need by: Creating and promoting the use of a common method for aggregating, transforming and publishing

government data from differing sources into a more easily accessible format Providing an easy way to link the use of mobile web app templates and "open access data" for use by

developers and ‘citizen developers’ alike

Citadel Objectives

Key Outcomes of the Citadel…on the Move open innovation approach for cities are:

• Agility improves with opening up data to enable users' to rapidly and inexpensively create mobile

applications that cover public service gaps and needs – innovation at the speed of life!

• Costs for delivering public services may be greatly reduced as citizens contribute talent to R&D for free

• Device and location independence enables users to access systems using a web browser regardless of

their location or what ever handheld device they are using (e.g., iPhone, Android, Blackberry etc.)

• Scalability increased as all citizens can potentially create public services without the need for highly

skilled programmers, plus innovations can be shared across cities

• Economic growth & innovation as the power of Open Data enables SMEs to create new market

products

• Added value delivered through the sharing of new innovative services between cities – mobile service

apps that work anywhere

Citadel Outcomes

Visioning Exercise

“Imagine that it is 2015 and Citadel...on the Move has just finished. What are the desired project outcomes that you would need/expect?”

Vision Exercise

Open Data Service Innovation Technology

COFFEE BREAK

(up to 11.00h)

Intro to WP2,3,4 and 7

WP2: Policy and Business Requirements

Susie Ruston

Objectives

Key Tasks

Timing

Responsibility

Partner No. Partner Man Months

1 CORVE 9

2 ISP 1

3 GENT 2

4 IM 1

5 MCC 1

6 DAEM 1

7 INTRASOFT 0

8 ALFA 0

9 IBBT 0

10 ITEMS 7

11 ASTON 7

12 FEAP 1

13 GCD 1

14 VIC 4.5

15 ATC 0

WP3: Open Access and Data Management

Jean Barocco (Alfamicro)

Work Package Lead Key Contributors

Timing

Timing and Responsibility

Overview

Approach

• Stakeholder involvement in «opening up» and governance of Open Data

• Cyclic «application-pull» development path: datasets defined by needs

• Select a user-friendly data format tool to perform the clean up of unstructured data

• Involving citizens and businesses in dataset «clean-up» and maintenance

• Procedures and standards are formalised on an on-going, incremental basis

Outcomes

• Open Data Governance Groups formed in each pilot city with key stakeholders

• Open Data Agreements for each city and Open Data Charter for the Citadel network

• Impacts and protocols for a) privacy and security and b) semantic frameworks

• Open repository of datasets and access tools in the Citadel Hub Service Catalogue

Results

• Activities in WPs 4 and 5 will be enabled by the required underlying datasets

• Open Data «literacy» spread to city governments and citizens and businesses– Enabling role for innovative smart services– Awareness of privacy and other implications– Dataset maintenance as civic engagement

• City governments made aware of the significance and impact of Open Data

WP4: Innovation & Pilot Preparation

Christos Georgousopoulos (Intrasoft)

Timing and Responsibility

Work Package Lead

Key Contributors

Timing

Main Objectives• This work package covers the operational and technical tasks needed

to prepare the four city sites for the pilot deployment that will validate the Citadel...on the Move solution

• Key objectives :– Understanding the elements that make a city and its services ‘smart’– Developing the Citadel solution taking into account the requirements and needs

of the end users– Integrating the most appropriate technical elements to create an easy-to-use and

access solution based on the work on Open Access and Data management (WP3)– Mobilising the key actors needed to deploy the pilot in real life setting in the four

cities participating in the project (as per the work in WP5)

The work package will be lead by INTRASOFT with the support of all the project partners.

Key activities• T4.1 Scenario Development

– creating a shared understanding among partners of what makes a city ‘smart’ through literature review and internal partner workshops

– organising workshops in each of the pilot cities to create detailed service scenarios explaining and putting in context the type of data and technology to be used, to define the role of the users and ensure that the mobile service application templates meet their requirements and check that the presentation of the overall solution is both compelling and easy to use, irrespective of the platform where it is hosted

• T4.2 User Requirements Gathering– organising a number of consultation meetings where relevant stakeholders (mainly Living Labs staff

and city administrators from the participating countries) will be invited to collect the necessary input that will drive the project developments.

D4.1. Scenarios Specifications - M3

D4.2. User requirements - M6

Key activities

• T4.4 Future Proofing with Geo-based technologies (IOT)– investigating the software adaptors and elements needed to deliver the ‘smart’ elements of the

potential service applications as per the scenarios developed– identifying the appropriate IOT middleware to ensure that any newly developed service applications

during the pilots utilize geo-based elements enabling the apps to be shared with other cities– exploring integration approaches for these innovative web-based apps to perform efficiently across

pilot cities– exploring infrastructure needs against the current (and foreseeable future) IOT platforms in the market– facilitating the creation of future-proofed Mobile Web Application templates

• T4.3 Technical Requirements Development– detailing the technical requirements for the Citadel solution – addressing elements related to the technical integration and cooperation of the various technology

components needed to develop smart mobile template applications for city services in the transport and tourism domains

– exploring requirements for the practical deployment of the envisaged applications on multiple platforms

– ensuring that interoperability is built into the process in tight collaboration with WP3 and WP5– adopting a cyclic, iterative development process and enabling the project to incorporate user demands

vertically throughout the data system

D4.3. Technical Requirements - M8

Key activities• T4.5 Template Mobile Applications Creation

– Developing the template mobile applications to assist any citizen (incl. non-professional developers) in leveraging Living labs and Smart cities service delivery innovation

– Providing working code consuming real available open data sources in the Citadel hub, to citizen developers under an open source license

– Targeting a number of predefined application scenarios, working across more than one city making uses of mobile technology

– Exploiting Open Source and Cross Platform technologies (HTML5, PHP, MySQL) to develop the template applications

– Demonstrating modern devices technologies, such as Geo-location, use of Camera, Near Field Communication and QR codes

• T4.6 Testing and Review– Testing the Mobile Applications templates with the newly formatted data made available in the

Citadel Open Data Commons – Opening up the templates for comments and refinements to the existing online innovation networks

that have an interest in smart mobile apps

D4.4.x Template Applications Iteration - M12,16,22,30

General Concerns …

• Shifting of Tasks’ duration & deliverable deadlines– need an official confirmation by the Coordinator/EC

• Issue with Deliverable D5.4 of WP5– leadership needs to be clarified

WP7: Dissemination & Exploitation

Daniel van Lerberghe (FEAP)

Timing and Responsibility

Work Package Lead Key Contributors

Timing

Overview

EurActiv Network: 15 countries + 15 Languages

Work Package Lead

LUNCH

Parallel Sessions

A) WP2 – Policy and Business Requirements(Room next door)

B) WP3 – Open Access and Data Management & WP4 – Innovation and Pilot Preparation

(this Room)

A1) WP2 – Policy and Business Requirements

Creation of Deliverable 2.1V-ICT-OR/SOCITM

D2.1 – Current Situation Analysis – Due M2

Benchmarking exercise to:

• Help understand the current situation in Europe around open data provision for innovation

• Learn about good practices in using government data

• Understand the problems that arise in its use

Participating Partners: CORVE, plus VIC –SOCITM and GCD networks will lead this activity with

input from ASTON and ITEMS. Each of the Pilot Cities will provide information for their

country.

Scope

• Define open government data provision for innovation in local public services

• Help understand the current situation in Europe around open government data

provision for innovation

• Drivers

• Policy

• Scope of open data

• Publication e.g. redaction, format, channels, marketing

• Learn about best practices in using open government data

• Stakeholders – Public bodies, private sector, social entrepreneurs

• Good practice examples and outcomes

• Understand the problems that arise in its use

Literature Review

Schedule Weeks -4 to -1 Weeks 1-2 Weeks 3-4

Literature discovery Extract key material Draft report

SOCITM 2 5 2

VICTOR 2

CORVE 2

GCD 2

ASTON 2

ITEMS 2

Discussion• Initial Sources• Framework

Consult with Stakeholders

Schedule Create database of

survey participantsDesign and pilot survey

Set-up and market online survey

Analysis of completed returns

Draft report

SOCITM 2 2 3 5ALL PARTNERS PROG OFFICE 2

Discussion• See next slides

Discuss

How important are the following drivers for open government data provision for local public

services innovation in your country? [Rate each on a scale of 0 to 5]

• Political i.e. policy frameworks, political support

• Economic i.e. cost reduction, efficiency

• Social i.e. transparency and accountability

• Technological i.e. consumerisation of ICT (e.g. ubiquitous smartphones, internet access,

etc.) and utility computing (e.g. apps, gps, etc.)

• Legal i.e. statutory or regulatory requirement(s)

• Environmental i.e. supporting environmental goals, carbon reduction etc.

• Other [please specify]

Discuss

What legal or policy frameworks (if any) exist for open government data provision in your

country?

o national

o local

What is the scope of open government data provision (if any) in your country?

o Public policy

o Service areas - strategy and performance

o Service areas – operational data

DiscussWhat guidance (if any) exists to support the publication of open government data in your country?o Title and sourceo What does this guidance cover?

redaction format channels Other

Exploitation of government open data :o How is open government data being exploited by stakeholders?

Public bodies, private sector, social entrepreneurs, other(s) [please specify] Services - health, social welfare, planning, environment, leisure, etc. Types – location-based; individual; family; community Technologies – apps, gaps, etc.

o Good practice examples and outcomeso Understand the problems that arise in its use

Discuss

Exploitation of open government data :

• Please provide details of up to five good practice examples of open government data

exploitation:

– Location and organisation details

– Purpose

– Method

– Assessment (using IBM 5-stage maturity model?)

– Outcomes achieved

A2) WP2 – Policy and Business Requirements

Creation of Deliverable 2.2CORVE/ITEMS

Plan outlining the strategic approach the Team will take to develop common standards

Methodology that will:•Meet the needs of key stakeholders•Ensure that only good practice is considered•Generate flexible recommendations that can easily adapt with tech advances

Key Questions to be Addressed:•What relevant standards already exist•What are the role and position of existing SDOs regarding Open Data issue•What are the gaps in standards?•Where does Europe need a common approach?•What information does the project and pilot need to deliver to help define standards?•How will common consensus be generated for standards?•What is the next step?

D2.2 – Standard Development Strategy– Due M4

B) WP3 – Open Access and Data Management& WP4 – Innovation and Pilot Preparation

Jean Barocca/Jesse March (Alfamicro)Christos Georgousopoulos (Intrasoft)

WP3 – Open Access and Data Management

T3.1 - Management of Open Data Governance Groups

D3.1 - Open Data City Charters Iteration 1: Common open data agreement for the project in the four pilot cities. [due m4]T3.2 - Citadel Open Data Charter

C) WP4 – Innovation and Pilot Preparation

T4.1 -Scenario Development

D4.1 - Scenario Specifications: Report provide a baseline on the existing levels of smart service delivery across Europe, as well as outlining the potential service applications in transport and tourism fields [due m3]

Scenario No.xx<partner acronym>

Scenario Title: <fill-in the title>

Scenario Description: <fill-in a short description>

• Open Data Sets (Available)– <list the available open data sets>– …– …

• Open Data Sets (To be Available)– <list the data sets that are likely to be provided to the public (as

‘open’)>– …– …

WP4 – Innovation and Pilot Preparation

T4.2 - User Requirements Gathering

D4.2 - User Requirements: This deliverable will document and consolidate the results from the organization of the workshops in the form of user requirements and needs. [due m6]

T2.1 Current Situation Analysis

• What kind of data can be “opened up” and if not, why? How to segment types of data (from transparency to

• operational services, from national to local)?• What similarities exist between the data formats, what are the key

differences?• What are the key barriers to using open data for city service

creation?• What are the specific organisations that members states have been

setup and what are their mandate ?• Which existing open innovation ecosystems are currently using

open data to develop mobile applications?• What legislation exists in this area, are there new European

regulations that could help?

COFFEE BREAK

(up to 16:15h)

Parallel sessions: feedback and action points

• Reporting Visioning session and WP2 tasks(20min)

Susie Ruston/Julia Glidden (CORVE)

• Reporting parallel session WP3 (20min)Jean Barocca/Jesse March (Alfamicro)

• Reporting parallel session WP4 (20min)Christos Georgousopoulos (Intrasoft)

“First General Assembly”

Geert Mareels

AGENDA

• Contract and payments• Proposal for Consortium agreement,

consortium bodies and chain of decision• Consortium• Other business: Next GA, …

Contract and payments

Proposal for Consortium agreement

• Section 1: Definitions• Section 2: Purpose• Section 3: Entry into force, duration and termination• Section 4: Responsibilities of Parties• Section 5: Liability towards each other• Section 6: Governance structure• Section 7: Financial provisions• Section 8: Foreground• Section 9: Access Rights• Section 10: Non-disclosure of information• Section 11: Miscellaneous• Section 12: Signatures

Consortium

Next GA

Conclusions of the day

Conclusions of the day

What’s next: agenda for next meetings, agreements on reporting and communication (15min)

Geert Mareels (CORVE) Hugo Kerschot (IS-practice)

Thank you!