48
. ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property Mandy One,Mandy Two, Mandy Three, Mandy Four, Mandy V, Mandy Six, and CM 21 to CM 25 Mineral Claims Omineca Mining Division i~.~~;T’i:-~~~~~’ NTS 93 FlOW and 93 F 15W j :~:!-::,~ ‘3 M/53 deg. 44 min., W 124 deg. 47.5 min. I ! Nathen Kencayd, owner Delbert Myers, P. Gee., author 9 November 2003

‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

.

‘CI’

Prospecting and Geochemical Report

Copley Lake Property

Mandy One,Mandy Two, Mandy Three, Mandy Four, Mandy V, Mandy Six, and CM 21 to CM 25 Mineral Claims

Omineca Mining Division

i~.~~;T’i:-~~~~~’ NTS 93 FlOW and 93 F 15W

j :~:!-::,~ ‘3 M/53 deg. 44 min., W 124 deg. 47.5 min.

I ! Nathen Kencayd, owner

Delbert Myers, P. Gee., author 9 November 2003

Page 2: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

Prospecting and Geochemid Report

Copiey Lake Property

Mandy One,Mandy Two, Mandy three, Mandy Four, Mandy V, Mandy Six, and CM 21 to CM 25 Mineral Claims

Omineca Mining Division NTS 93 FIlOW and 93 FI 15W

N 53 deg. 44 min., W 124 deg. 47.5 min.

Nathen Kencayd, owner Delbert Myers, P. Gee., author

9 November 2003 revised March 2004

c:\msworks\data\consult\copiey2.wps

Page 3: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

Table of Contents

A. Introduction

f3. Work Undertaken

C. Results and Discussion

0. Conclusions

E. References

F. Appendices Statement of Costs Statement of Qualifications Certificates of Analysis Rock Sample Descriptions

Figure 1. Location map

List of tables and figures

Figure 2. Claim map, Mandy and CM claims

Figure 3. Prospecting traverses and rock sample sites

Figure 4. Gold geochemical survey, rocks and soils

Figure 5. MO geochemical survey, rocks and soils

Table 1. Soil sample summary

Table 2. Rock sample summary

2

Page 4: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

A. Introduction

Location

The Mandy and CM claims lie within the Fraser Basin, near the Nechako Plateau, of the Interior Plateau of British Columbia (as defined by Holland, 1976), approximately 35 km south of the village of Fort Fraser (Figure 1).

The legal corner post of the Mandy One to Mandy Four claims is located at N 53 deg. 44 min. 02.8 sec., WI24 deg. 47 min. 28.4 sec.

as determined with a Garmin 45XL GPS receiver by N. Kencayd (Figure 2).

Elevations on the claims range from a low of about 2500’ along Targe Creek which drains Copley Lake (2582’). A number of steep hills, elongate in a SW-NE direction, rise to more than 3200’.

The claims lie within the Vanderhoof Forest District. Forest covers the most of the claims (except where logged) and is the primary land use. Removal of pine where killed by mountain pine beetle is ongoing in the area of the claims.

Access

Access is by truck on the Holy Cross Forest Service Road, south from Highway 16 at Lejac, between Fort Fraser and Fraser Lake. Three logging roads approach the claims. At kilometer 50 of the HCFSR , the 150 Road begins and leads east to the Mandy claims and Copley Lake. It crosses the Mandy claims from km 9.3 to km 13. A canoe was used to access parts of the claims north of Copley Lake. Another road (45 Road) from the HCFSR comes east to the area of the property. The third road approaches from the NE from Hallet Lake.

All work described in this report was undertaken by Nathan Kencayd during the summer of 2003. The author has prepared this report from information supplied him by Mr. Kencayd, but has not examined any of the work done in the field.

3

Page 5: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property
Page 6: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

9

0 , 5OD n ] Fig 2 Claim Map , , Handy and CM Claims NIS 93 F/10, A5

Page 7: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

Claims

The property consists of eleven mineral claims as shown in Figure 2 and as listed below:

lMQ2.Q record no reco d data Mandy One 387388 4 Jun; 2001 Mandy Two 387389 8 4 June 2001 Mandy Three 387390 8 4 June 2001 Mandy Four 387391 8 4 June 2001 Mandy V 389746 12 9 Sept. 2001 Mandy Six 389747 12 9 Sept. 2001 CM21 396188 15 18 Aug. 2002 CM 22 396189 10 18 Aug. 2002 CM 23 402995 IO lOJune CM 24 404297 2 8 Aug. 2003 CM 25 404804 16 18 Aug. 2003

total 109 units

The claims are wholly owned by Nathen Kencayd.

Previous work

exoirv da& 25 July 2004 25 July 2004 25 July 2004 25 July 2004 25 July 2004 25 July 2004 25 July 2004 25 July 2004 25 July 2004 25 July 2004 25 July 2004

The first claims staked at Copley Lake for precious metal mineralization, the Cop l-3 mineral claims, were staked in 1982 by D. R. MacQuarne on behalf of Abo Oil Corporation of Vancouver.

A program of soil and rock sampling and geological mapping, in 1982 and 1983, identified five areas anomalous in Au and Hg (BC Ass. Rpt. 11,850).

Laird (1985) cites a rock sampling program by Homestake Mineral Development Co. in 1985 which located two As-Hg-Sb anomalies, one of which was also anomalous in gold.

Rio Algom optioned the property. Work was done on the claims at Copley Lake in 1985 (BC Ass. Rpt. 13.944) under supervision of R.M. Cann. Four zones of epithermal mineralization were sampled on two prominent hills. The largest of these, the Eagle Zone on Clan Hill, is exposed over a 25x100 m area and is open to the north. Mineralization occurs in a brecciated zone of aphanitic rhyolite. The best of five trenches here, averaged 165 ppb Au and 0.8 ppm Ag over 4.5 m. Coincident, but more extensive, MO (to 183 ppm) and As (+30 ppm) anomalies occur at the Eagle Zone. Rio Algom dropped the option. This was probably because of low Au and Ag values in their rock samples. It should be noted that molybdenum prices were low at that time.

6

Page 8: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

Subsequently, prospecting in the claim area by N. Kencayd has located 100 ppb plus Au values in yellow stained, quartz veins on a cliff with lOO+ ppm MO values. One sample was found that contained 680 ppb Au and 797 ppm MO. This came from fresh-looking outcrop with 2 phases of quartz veining (Myers,2003)

Regional Geology

The Mandy claims lie within the lntermontaine Belt of the Canadian Cordillera. Regional mapping at I:253440 scale was done by the GSC (Tipper, 1963). Tipper’s stratigraphic interpretation has been updated (refer to GSC Map 1424A). The most recent mapping in the area (sheet 93 F/6) is by L.J. Diakow et al. More specifically, the claims lie within the accreated Stikine terrane.

The area containing the claims is underlain by Lower Jurassic Hazelton Group volcanics which are intruded by Late Jurassic intermediate intrusives of the Francois Lake suite. These intrusives host the Endako Mine molybdenum deposit near Endako, B.C.

Those rocks are overlain by upper Cretaceous to lower Tertiary Ootsa Lake Group volcanica These in turn are overlain by Oligocene and Miocene Endako Group volcanics. Miocene and Pliocene olivine basalts occur over a large area kxally centered on Vanderhoof.

Extensive Quatemary and Pleistocene deposits, mainly of glacial origin cover bedrock. Latest glacial movements in the Copley Lake area were to the NE to ENE.

Economic assessment of property

Work on the claims has located Au-Ag-As-MO mineralization in quartz veined, rhyolitic, volcanic rocks. The style of mineralization is suggestive of epithermal gold- silver deposits. Areas of significant MO mineralization have also been identified.

7

Page 9: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

8. Work Undertaken

The purpose of prospecting and sampling was to search for both precious metal (Au-Ag) and molybdenum mineralization.

Prospecting was extended from the Mandy daims onto the CM claims. Traverses and sample locations are shown on Figure 3. The six Mandy and five CM claims cover about 2725 hectares (109 claim units).

Soil and rrjck sampling ‘were undertaken in areas of particular interest (Fig 3.). Soil samples were taken using a Dutch soil auger from below the A horizon. A sampling interval of 20m was used along straight or curved lines (Fig. 3). Samples were placed in bags and shipped to Acme Analytical for analysis.

Rock samples (Fig. 3 and Appendix 4) are grab samples of particular interest or are representative of outcrops sampled. In many cases, samples where located ~~~.~ using a Garmrn 45XL GPS receivei. These samples were also sent to Acme for analysis

8

Page 10: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

The following rock types were observed on or near the claims (Fig. 3): rhyoRte(V4) and rhyolite porphyry(V4p) basalt(Vl), basalt porphyry(V1 p), and vesicular basalt(Vlv), breccias(bx) granodionte to diorite(P3 to PZ), lithic tuff(Vdl), and pebble conglomerate(S4)

Rhyolitic (unit V4) (to dacitic) volcanics are the unit hosting most mineralisation found to date. Clan Hill and several other hills, south of Copley Lake, composed of rhyolitic rocks stand above the surrounding area. These are believed to be Eocene Ootsa Lake Group rocks.

Just below the Mandy One to Mandy Four LCP is rhyolite outcrop with 2 stages of mineralization, near the Eagle Zone of Cann (BC Ass Rpt 13,944).

The black chalcedonic quartz veins on the Mandy Two claim are anomalous in Pb (to 1215 ppm) and Zn (to 6370 ppm), but not anomalous in Au (all IO ppb or less). High Pb values were also noted bout 750m N of the SE corner of Mandy Six (to 540 ppm Pb) (Myers, 2003).

Basalt (unit Vl)(or an&site) including porphyritic and vesicular members occur within the Ootsa Lake volcanic% In some cases these a just dark-colored dacites and have been misnamed. It is not clear if Oligocene and Miocene Endako Group or Miocene and Pliocene basalts occur on the claims. A NW trending series of outcrops of feldspar-porphyritic basalt, which is magnetic, occurs on the CM 25 claim and NW.

Pebble conglomerate (unit S4) occurs on the CM 23 claim. It is thought to be part of the Ootsa Lake Group, also.

Granodiorite (unit P3) is exposed near Targe Creek, E of the Mandy 3 claim, however exposure is limited by overburden. It is in Targe Creek downstream from both Copley Lake and the 90 degree elbow. It is assumed to be Late Jurassic Topley intrusive.

87 soil samples were collected from two lines at each of two locations (Mandy Six and CM 23 claims). A summary of the low, high, and number of anomalous samples for each element is given in Table 1. Lab reports are given in Appendix 3. Only two soil samples contained more than 100 ppb Au (cms7 and cms23). Both are on the CM 23 claim near its NW corner. 20 soil samples contained 10 ppb Au or more. In the future soil lines should be N-S to NW-SE in direction, to avoid sampling

w

9

Page 11: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

Table 1. Soil geochemical summary, Copley Lake claims, n= 87 samples

element low threshold high # anomalous Au, wb MO, wm Cu, fvn Pb, ppm Zn, ppm Aa wm Ni, wm Co, ppm Mn, ppm Fe, % As pm u, wm Th, PPm St wm Cd, ppm Sb. ppm Bi, wm v, wm Ca, % P, %

L La, wm Cr, pm Mg, % Ba, wm Ti, % 8, Pw Al, % Na, % K,% W rm TI, wm W. Pm

<2 10 1 1

<3 16

co.3 1

2: 0.84

<2 4

2 8

co.5 <3 <3

0.49 0.023

5 6

0.05 73

0.1 <3

0.53 0.01 0.03

<2 <5 <I

10 100

30 250 1.5 50 25

3000 5.00

20 20 20

100 5

10 IO ? 1

0.3 50 50

1 400

? ? 4

0.1 0.3 IO ?

10

366 20 18 6

429 2 361 5

1534 3 3.5 3 45 43 2

7605 6 7.15 4

47 4 33 1 16 80

5.4 1 11 1 4

122 0.98

0.322 1 50 1 53 1

1.69 2 570 6

0.14 8

5.61 2 0.07 0.32 2

4 <5

5

Analyses by Acme Analytical Laboratories Ltd., Vancouver ICP-ES analysis after hot HCI-HN03-HZ0 digestion

Page 12: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

“down ice” from known mineralization. MO, Pb, Mn, and Ba were also anomalous in 5 or more samples.

143 rock samples were taken during the course of prospecting the claims. A summary of the low, high, and number of anomalous samples for each element is given in Table 2. Samples were anaiyzed by Acme Analytical Laboratories by standard rock geochemical methods (Appendix 3). Three samples contained more than 1000 ppb Au (wrrl09,cml28, and-cm131-). All threearein the area~nearthe NW corner of the CM 23 claim. Three samples (m211, m221, m227) contained more than 500 ppm MO. All are at Clan Hill. Au (51 samples), Ba (37 samples), Pb (35 samples), and MO, Ag, As, and Mg (15 or more samples each) were most commonly anomalous elements in rock samples. Only the Au and MO values appear to be of economic interest.

Four areas of interest were examined in some detail this season by Kencayd. These can be located on Figure 3.

Area 1 is 400m east of the CM 23 LCP on the CM 23 claim. It has been recently logged. This is a new gold showing. The main outcrop is reddish to purplish rhyolite feldspar porphyry. SW across a small ravine, a small outcrop of conglomerate occurs. Mineralization outcrops to the NW across another small ravine. Three samples of red stained porphyry include:

cm107117ppbAu, cm108257 ppb Au, and cm109 1203 ppb Au.

cm 109 is taken from extremely hard, quartz-rich rock.

Further sampling of this area and of the porphyry to the SE, yielded scattered gold and silver with the hard, quartz veined rock yield Au values around 1300 ppb. Other samples ran as high as 4776 ppb Au (cm1 31; with 12.6 ppm Ag and slightly elevated Pb and Ba).

Soil samples were taken at 20 m intervals near by using a hand auger. Samples cm1 to cm47 contained up to 366 ppb Au, 429 ppm Cu, and 3.5 ppm Ag. MO values are low (less than 18 ppm MO).

Area 2 is 600m SE of Muskrat Lake on the Mandy Six claim, between Copley and Muskrat Lakes. Specular hematite was observed over a 30m diameter area. Copper staining was observed to the east. Rock sampling (cm1 14-l 16, ml 93- 194,m210) failed to give interesting Au and Cu values. The 45 Road was built into this area in 2002. More Cu staining was exposed, along with epidote, in porphyritic volcanic. Soil sampling near by (mlOl-114, m130-164) yield only weak Au anomalies (to 18 ppb Au) and background &I (to 75 ppm Cu) values.

11

Page 13: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

‘v Area 3 is located on the Mandy One to Mandy Four claims near the LCP,

near Clan Hill. This area was mapped and sampled in detail by Rio Algom circa 1985. The Eagle and Suvey Zones of Laird(l985) occur here. Kencayd’s samples of fresh rock surfaces have run up to 530 ppb Au, 790 ppm MO, and minor silver. Mineralization is best where two phases of quartz are seen. Several weeks of exposure to the air changes the appearance of minerlization, making it less visible.

12

Page 14: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

Table 2. Rock geochemical summary, Copley Lake claims, n= 143 samples

element LOW threshold high # anomalous 10 4776 51 Au, ppb

MO. mm Cu, pm Pb, Ppm Zn, ppm Aa wm Ni, wm Co, ppm Mn, w-n Fe, % As, wm Us wm Th. wm Sr, ppm Cd, fwm Sk PW Bi, ppm V, fwm Ca. % P, % La. wm 0, ppm Mg, % Ba, ppm Ti, % 0 pm Al, % Na. % K,% W wm TI, pm Hg, wm

e2 1

<I <3

1 co.3

1 4 17

0.22 <2 4 <2

2 CO.5

<3 <3

1 0.01

0.001 <I

1 0.01

10 <O.Ol

<3 0.05 0.01 0.03

4 4 4

10 100

30 250 1.5 50 30

3000 5.00

20 20 20

100 5

10 10

200 1

0.3 50 50

1 500

? ? 2

0.2 0.3 10 ?

10

604 19 4097 10

266 35 689 1 12.6 15 112 2 42 0

9619 9 10.67 13 1108~ 17

16 12

255 a 7.5 1 92 12

6 454 1

II.06 14 0.319 1

47 92 10

3.21 15 2069 37 0.027

10 4.12 7 0.48 4 0.33 7

13 2 6

12 1

Analyses by &me Analytical Laboratories Ltd., VaqqjVer ICp-(jS analysis after hof vC(-HN03-Ii20 digefitipn

,,

Page 15: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

A hypabyssal, carbonate-altered, dacitic dike was exposed by roadwork to the north of Clan Hill along the 50 Road.

Anomalous rock samples from area 3 include: rhyolite porphyry samples:

m.221 (594 ppb Au, 519 ppm MO, 145 ppm Pb, 337 As) - first hump, base of Clan Hill

m211 (530 ppb Au, 527 ppm MO, 155 ppm As), V4 w 2 phases of quarts m224 (132 ppb Au), m225 (480 ppb Au, 397 ppm MO), m226 (186 ppm

As) - second hump m227 (334 ppb Au, 604 ppm MO, 174 ppm As, 1452 ppm Ba) - third hump

breccia: m195,m196(1203 ppm Cu, 568 ppm Ba) in the burrow pit: ml97 (406 ppm Cu)

m212 (943 ppm Ba) m213 (137 ppb Au, 103 ppm Pb, 689 ppm Zn) m214 (1979 ppm Ba) m217-218 m219 (704 ppm Ba) m223 (484 ppm Cu)

Earlier sampling from area 3 (Myers, 2003) contained 680 and 550 ppb Au and high MO values. Earlier samples from an outcrop just NE of D contained 375 ppb Au and 220 ppm MO.

Sampling on the east and south sides of the hill south of area 3 returned some values in MO (up to 529 ppm). Arsenic values are highest here, up to 1180 ppm.

Area 4 is 500m S of Muskrat Lake on the Mandy Six claim. Samples ml99 207 were taken there. Sample m207 contained 4097 ppm Cu and 37 ppm MO. These rock samples appeared somewhat leached. IOOOm S to SSW of Muskrat Lake more Au (to 203 ppb in cm 135, yellow stained quartz) anomalies and MO anomalies (to 217 ppm in cm 124, quartz with minor fine grain pyrite?) were obtained on the CM 21 claim.

14

Page 16: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

w 0. Conclusions

Kencayd has noted that better gold and molybdenum values can be obtained in less exposed outcrops, suggesting that some leaching off mineralization has occurred. This suggests the possibility of better grades in fresher rock. Trenching by Rio Algom (AR 13,944) did not, however, find better grades within the trenches.

Two phases of quartz veining have been observed, but the differences between them have not been described.

A new gold showing was discovered near the NW corner of the CM 23 claim. Au values in rock to 4776 ppb were found. Ba values to 2069 ppm were also found. The mineralization is associated with silicification. Geological mapping and sampling should be undertaken. This area is the best drill target for Au mineralization at present

Sampling near Clan Hill has located additional AU-MO mineralization (530 ppb Au and 790 ppm MO) north of the h4andy One to Mandy Four LCP.

Compilation of soil geochemistry from AR 11,850 and rock geochemical results of AR 13,944 may suggest mineralized zones which do not outcrop. More detailed structural mapping or geophysical surveys would be valuable for detecting

‘clr recessive weathering zones (e.g. clay-altered), which could host more significant mineralization.

The age of known mineralization has not been established. It is not clear whether or not Endako group volcanics might host similar, precious metal mineralitation.

Molybdenum mineralization is significant. Known occurrences are more extensive and more consistent than Au mineralization. Two zones (S of Mandy Sii and at Clan Hill) outlined in AR 13,944 are open and warrant more exploration. The new MO anomalies outlined in Myers(2003) should be investigated.

15

Page 17: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

w E. References

Diakow, L.J, Green, K., Whittles, J., and Perry, A., Geology of the Natalkuz Lake Area. British Columbia Geological Survey Open File 1993-14, Victoria, B.C.

Gravel, J. and Allen, D.G.. 1983. Geology and Geochemistry of Cop l-3 Mineral Claims. B.C. Assessment Report 11,850, BCMEMPR, Victoria, B.C.

Holland, Stuart S., 1976. Landforms of British Columbia. British Columbia Dept. Mines and Petroleum Resources Bulletin 48, Victoria, B.C.

Laird, B., 1985. Geology, Geochemistry, and Trenching of Cop l-7 Mineral Claims. B.C. Assessment Report 13,944, BCMEMPR, Victoria, B.C.

Myers, D, 2003. Prospecting Report, Copley Lake Property, Mandy One to Six Claims. B.C. Assessment Report, BCMEMPR, Victoria, B.C.

Tipper, H., 1963. Nechako River Map Area, British Columbia. Geological Survey of Canada Memoir 324, Ottawa, Ontario, (includes Map1 131A).

Tipper, H.W., Campbell, R.B., Taylor, G.C., and Stott, D.F., 1979. Parship River, British Columbia. Geological Survey of Canada Map 1424A, Ottawa, Ontario,

16

Page 18: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

F. Appendices

ltemized cost statement

Labor: 36 man-days re Mandy claims at $200/day 46 man days re CM claims at $2OO/day

during the periods 12-27 Sep. 2002,16-24 April 2003, 3-6,l l-13,19,22-30 June, I-II, 26-29 July, and 9-11 August by N. Kencayd

Analyses: 78 rock and soil samples for Au(fire), 34 element ICP @ $25/sample

shipping 98 rock and soil samples for Au(fire) 34 element ICP

@$25/sample shipping

Rocm and board: 29 man-days at $40/manday 46 man-days at $4Olman-day

Transportation: 29 man-days at $35/man-day 46 man-days at $35/man-day

Field supplies: 29 man-days at $9/man-day 46 man-days at $9/man-day

Report preparation: 2 man-day, Del Myers at $5OO/day

total expenses

$7200. $9200.

$1950 $118

$2450 $118

$1160 $1840

$1015 $1610

$ 261 $ 414

$1000

$28,336

17

Page 19: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

Statement of Qualifications

I, Nathan Kencayd of Vanderhoof, B.C., have been prospecting for over 20 years. I have successfully completed a geology course from U.B.C. in the early 1980’s.

18

Page 20: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

Statement of Qualifications

I, Delbert E. Myers, Jr., of Prince George, B.C. have practiced mineral exploration geology from before 1970 until 1995.

I have received a B.S. degree in Geological Sciences from Pennsylvania State University in 1970 and an M. SC. degree in Geochemistry from the University of Toronto in 1973.

I have been registered as a Professional Geologist by both the APEGGNW and by the APEGBC. I am currently registered by the APEGBC.

---~------.----.---.----------------

Delbert E. Myers, Jr., P.Gao.(ret.) 21645 Hwy. 97 S Prince George, BC V2N 6A3 phone 250-330-4465 fax 250-330-4449

19

Page 21: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

L Appendix 3. Analysis reports

c:\msworks\data\consult\copiey2.wpS

19

Page 22: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

, 'ACKVANALYTICAL ,LABORATORIES LTD. ,, 852 E. HASTINGS ST.' VANCOWR, ~6~ v6A ,lR6 ~,~~0~(6,~~:)2:5~~3~1~8~~,FAXf60,4)'2~5~~-~~~,1~~~~:, Accredited Co.)

GE&iEtiIU+ Kenoavd, Nathen EiLe # A205598

9 - 2027 Skyline~Road, Prince George BC VZK lJ5 Sutmitted by: Nathen Kencayd

C.3 P ~a Cr Mg 8a Ti B Al Na K u Au" Pt*' Pd** % %PpnPpn % Ppn xppm % % Xppn ppb ppb ppb

SAHPLE# pi

i

2

5

MO Cu Pb Zn Ag Ni Co Hn Fe As u AU Th ST Cd Sb Bi V pn Ppn PpnFw Ppn PWPpn Ppn % Ppm PFm Ppn Ppn Ppn PpnPpn Ppn Ppn

.I0 <.OOl 1 2

.Ol ,002 2 7

.Ol ,010 4 5

.Ol ,004 7 6

.35 ,037 7 5

.01

.Ol .Ol .Ol .03

.Ol

.Ol

.01

.95 1.20

3 q.01 <3 825 <.Ol ~3 452 .Ol <3

.o, .46 c.01 <2 c2

.I2 .Ol .08 3 117

.I2 <.Ol .06 <2 257

.I4 c.01 .I2 4 1203

51 CM107 CM108 CM109 CM110

CM111 CM112 CM113 CM114 CM115

<I 2 <3 1 <.3 1 <I 5 .06 c2 SE e2 c2 2 <.5 <3 ‘3 Cl : 2 9 23 9 89 13 .6 .3 2 2 1 1 25 25 .22 .35 10 3 ~8 <8 ~2 <2 <2 <2 10 13 c.5 1.0 ~3 <3 ~3 <3 3 1

5 7 92 8 .9 2 <I 29 .27 7 12 <2 3 3 c.5 ~3 ~3 2 6 90 14 32 <.3 7 11 3769 1.68 6 11 <2 3 11 c.5 c3 c3 9

150 .Ol s3 442 .Ol -c3 .27 <.Ol .24 2 4

1 2 4 7 s.3 1 ‘I 26 .48 4 C8 <2 7 8 <.5 -c3 <3 2

: 3 3 9 6 19 6 c.3 c.3 3 1 1 1 250 56 .42 .51 4 5 C8 C8 s2 <2 7 5 II 5 c.5 c.5 i3 c3 s3 c3 2 3 1 2 <3 50 c.3 6 12 1310 5.33 5 <a <2 3 6 *.5 c3 <3 54 1 4 c3 71 c.3 6 14 1491 5.18 2 <a <2 3 8 c.5 x3 c3 84

.04 ,006 23 5

.05 ,008 11 2

.02: ,003 14 9

.23 ,111 19 7

84 c.01 <3 51 c.01 <3 28 .Ol <3 29 .07 3

.32 s.01 .26, 7 3

.34 c.01 .32 2 ~2

.21 c.01 .18 8 <2 1.16 .05 .09 2 ~2 1.60 .05 .06 ~2 <2 .15 .I17 7 6 10 .04 <3

CM116 CM117 CM118

2 2 ~3 60 <.3 4 21 1315 3.74 4 <8 c2 2 5 c.5 ~3 ~3 56 3 6 5 163 <.3 6 8 1031 2.46 2 ~8 ~2 3 10 c.5 <3 <3 28 1 24 8 39 <.3 1 3 445 .a7 2 ~8 ~2 2 4 c.5 c3 G 3 1 4 35 118 <.3 3 3 98 .49 8 -c8 <2 3 98 c.5 x3 <3 7 1 20 47 16 2.7 2 1 45 .70 19 C8 c2 2 31 c.5 10 x3 3

.I9 .I08 14 8 .99 25 .04 ‘3 1.22 .O‘ .09 ~2 <2

.47 ,077 18 11 .52 150 .Ol ‘3 .87 .05 .21 4 <2

.04 .028 5 2 .03 179 <.Ol ‘3 .27 c.01 .25 <2 ~2

.05 ,029 19 6 .04 2069 t.01 ‘3 .38 c.01 .23 2 4

.Ol ,005 3 6 .Ol 1211 <.Ol c3 .I, .01 .12 4 127

.Ol .005 4 6

.06 ,031 14 6

.07 ,006 47 3

.04 ,013 9 2

.03 ,003 4 11

.02

.03

.02

.02

.12 <.Ol .I2 4 128

.25 c.01 .23 3 ‘2 1242 .Ol ~3

329 .Ol <3 73 .01 <3

821 c.01 <3 1842 c.01. ~3

CM119 CM120

RE CM120 CM121 CH122 CM123 CM124

1 19 47 15 2.5 2 1 46 .70 19 ~8 <2 2 31 c.5 11 <3 3 2 3 6 47 c.3 1 2 521 1.19 2 <8 <2 2 7 c.5 s3 c3 5 1 1 17 31 c.3 1 4 362 .51 <2 <8 <2 12 8 c.5 s3 <3 2

15 10 7 115 c.3 3 2 806 .40 5 ** *2 3 12 <.5 <3 <3 3 17 6 35 27 2.3 6 4 150 .32 6 ~8 <2 ~2 50 c.5 3 c3 5

2 20 -z3 76 c.3 16 18 1043 5.08 7 <8 c2 3 48 <.5 3 c3 138 3 18 ~3 64 c.3 8 11 936 3.10 c2 <8 c2 3 48 q.5 <3 <3 71 5 406 79 58 .3 3 5 332 3.00 3 c8 ~2 3 7 c.5 <3 c3 3

19 8145 71.8 4 3 25 1.19 337 IO ~2 2 19 <.5 14 ~3 2

1.08 .150 10 47 1.86 .I23 10 27

.02 .023 32 3

.Ol .008 7 5

.34 q.01 .22 <2 i2

.27 <.Ol .21 2 7

.I4 .Ol .I0 4 60

1.68 .78 .03

59 .24 *3 1.31 .I2 .06 <2 <2 133 .04 c3 1.10 .05 .I3 c2 <2 140 *.01 <3 .44 .Ol .30 i2 3 161 .Ol ~3 .14 .Ol .I9 3 594

7 121 30 156 <.3 34 12 779 3.19 23 8 <2 4 27 5.4 5 5 73 .51 .096 16 161 .60 140 .09 <3 1.69 .03 .I5 4 488 493 493

GROUP 1D - 0.50 GM SAMPLE LEACHED WITH 3 ML 2-2-2 HCL-HN03-HZ0 AT 95 DEG. C FOR ONE HWR, OlLUTEO TO 10 ML, ANALYSED BY ICP-ES. UPPER tlM,TS - AG, A", HG, V = 100 PPM; MO, CO, CD, S8, 81, TH, " & B = 2,000 PPM; CU. P8, ZN, NI, MN, AS, V, LA, CR = 10,000 PPM. ASSAY RECOMMENDED FOR ROCK AND CORE SAMPLES IF C" P8 ZN AS ) 1%. A0 ) 30 PPM B AU > 1000 PPB

SAMPLE TYPE: ROCK R150 6OC AU** PT** PO" GROUP 38 BY FIRE ASSAY & ANALYSlS BY ICP-ES. (30 gm) Samples beginning 'RE' are Rerms and 'ME' are Reject Reruns.

DATE RECEIVED: OEC 30 2002 DATE REPORT MAILED:@‘+ 0. TOE, C.LEONG, J. UANG; CERTlFIEO B.C. ASSAYERS

All results are considered the confidential property of the client. Acme assumes the liabilities for actual cost of the analysis only. ,.&<A -

Page 23: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

SAMPLEY

SI <I <I <3 1 g.3 <I <I 4 .03 <2 ~8 e2 <2 2 e.5 <3 <3 Cl .13 S.001 CH127 2 5 32 6 .4 2 <I 24 .28 IO ~8 ~2 2 4 s.5 <3 <3 <I .26 .003 CM128 .+ 14 4 92 12 1.4 2 <l 22 .22 5 ‘8 ~2 <2 2 .5 5 <3 1 .Ob .004 CM129 1 5 98 37 c.3 3 Sl 88 .3b 14 ~8 <2 ~2 4 .5 <3 <3 3 .09 .009 CM130 4 2 9 24 c.3 2 ~1 30 .22 ~2 ~8 <2 ~2 2 q.5 <3 <3 Sl .Ob .005

CM131 CM132 CM133 CM134 CM135

JJ24 JJ25 RE JJ25

I4212 I4213 HZ14 M215

,~,,

MO Cu Pb 2n Ag Ni Co Mn Fe AS U Au Th Sr Cd sb ai V ca P ta cr MY3 Ba Ti B Al Na K U Tl Hg Au'* PnPpnPpnPpm PvPpnPpn Ppn x Ppn Ppn ppn Ppn w w PpmPWPpn 'X 74 Ppn Ppn x Ppn xppn

4 3 7 12 7 11

12 7 2 lb

8 110 195 27 12.6 3 1 41 1.28 146 37 b 6 22 s.3 6 1 46 .43 37

5 8 10 13 c.3 5 1 30 .4b 14 15 18 13 72 x.3 4 2 481 2.24 994

4 8 35 19 s.3 2 1 25 .50 15

5 <2 55 s.5 19 c3 1 .Ob ,011 11 14 <2 <2 27 s.5 3 <3 4 .04 .OOl <I 19 <2 <2 42 *.5 <3 <3 2 .09 .005 7 12 <2 3 lb *.5 42 <3 6 .05 ,015 25 6 <2 <2 29 .5 <3 <3 4 .05 ,020 11 14

.01

.04

.02

.04

.02

.02

.03

.03

.02

.02

2 e.01 <3 164 c.01 <3

69 <.Ol 6 la s.01 c3 35 s.01 7

640 s.01 4 1522 s.01 3 1712 s.01 ~3

677 q.01 8 921 c.01 ~3

x x XPWPP~PP~ wb

c.01 .39 .Ol <2 <5 <I <2 .15 <.o, .09 <2 s5 Cl a3 .lO .Ol .07 2 <5 Cl 1371 .31 c.01 .21 c2 <5 <I 140 .,a q.01 .13 2 <5 4 <2

.I3 q.01 .I5 ~2 ~5 <I 4776 .05 c.01 .03 6 ~5 *I 105 .20 q.01 .I3 ~2 ~5 -zl 146 .31 .Ol .2b 4 ~5 2 14 .I8 q.01 .12 ~2 ~5 *I 203

3 6 13 50 .3 2 2 321b <I 22 5 73 .7 22 10 3842 <I 4, q3 34 c.3 22 14 9446

2 2 3 6 q.3 3 1 121 3 2 <3 6 s.3 2 1 121

3 2 c3 33 c.3 4 3 658 1.71 6 2 5 2 .3 1 <I 21 .71 6 21 ~3 6 c.3 2 1 51 1.23 3 1 6 32 .4 3 4 4258 3.54 8 4 6 53 c.3 3 2 351 2.73

1.07 2.83 3.08

.81

.80

4 8

6

z 10

6

<2 <2 c2 <2 <2

<2 <2

4

8 *.5 56 <.5

103 c.5 a s.5 a c.5

23 q.5 32 g.5

6 s.5 7 c.5 9 s.5

<3 <3 1 <3 <3 77 <3 <3 94 <3 83 3

3 <3 4

<3 -z3 4 <3 <3 Cl

9 4 1 3 <3 1 3 c3 2

.39 .021 39 13 .03 2.32 .191 36 41 .b8

11.06 .I64 25 54 .47 .09 .019 35 11 .02 .09 .019 35 15 .02

.Ob

.05

.03

.05

.022 35 3 .02

.009 28 b .02 ,007 31 5 .Ol .020 32 11 .03 .013 19 9 .02

544 c.01 <3 121 .I2 7 106 .05 ~3

bb s.01 7 67 s.01 8

799 c.01 9 589 s.01 10 186 c.01 3

43 s.01 9 219 c.01 ~3

.30 c.01 .25 2 <5 <I <2

.71 .04 .14 <2 <5 <l 6

.87 .09 .08 <2 <5 <I 18

.24 s.01 .I5 2<5<1 5

.23 <.Ol .I5 2 <5 <l 2

.33 .02 .,a <2 ~5 ~1 *2

.31 s.01 .2b ~2 <5 <, <2

.31 <.Ol .23 ~2 ~5 4 .28 .02 .20 ~2 ~5 <l :

.28 .Ol .32 ~2 <5 *l 4

.35 s.01 .20 <2 <5 <I <2

.20 .Ol .22 <2 <5 4 207 5 2 6 37 <.3 4 2 84 2.48 8 ~8 ‘2 4 107 c.5 <3 3 4 .08 .024 24 4 .02 370 s.01 <3

11 11 99 6 2.2 3 2 23 1.66 453 *a <2 3 24 c.5 14 ~3 3 .02 .014 10 9 .Ol 333 s.01 4 6 125 30 152 s.3 34 12 769 3.11 22 <a ~2 4 27 5.2 5 b 74 .52 .088 17 161 .5a 142 .08 4 1.71 .03 .I4 6 <5 <I 489

GROUP 1O . 0.50 GM SAMPLE LEACHED UITH 3 ML 2-2-2 HCL-HN03-HZ0 AT 95 DEG. C FOR ONE HWR, OI,.“,EO TO 10 ML, ANALYSE0 8" ,CP-Es. UPPER LIMITS - AC, AU, HG. N = 100 PPM; MO, CO, CO, S8, 81, TH, " 8 B = 2,000 PPM; CU;PB, ZN, N,, MN, As, V, LA, CR z 10,000 ppM. ASSAY RECOMHENOEO FOR ROCK AN0 CORE SAMPLES IF C" PB 2N AS > 1%. PIG > 30 PPM 8 A" > 1000 PPB - SAMPLE TYPE: ROCK RI50 bOC AU*= GROUP 38 - 30.00 GM SAMPLE ANALYSIS BY FA,,CP. Sades beginning 'RE' are Reruns and 'RRE' we Reiect Reruns.

DATE RECEIVED: APR 25 2003 DATE REPORT MAILEDr c SIGNED BY...! 0. TOYE, C.LEONG, J. UANG: CERTIFIED B.C. ASSAYERS

ALI results are considered the confidential property of the client. Acme Bsstnws the Liabilities for actual cost of the analysis only.

Page 24: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

1 lde Cu Pb 2n Am Ni Ca nn Fe AS " A" Th SP Cd Sb 81 v ce P La cr ng Bali B Al Wa K W TI Hg AU+'

SI CM37 CM39 w139 CM140

‘1 4 <3 r1 <.3 4 55 119 50 10.2 4 28 51 15 3.1 4 is 18 2a .a 4 10 68 7'7 .b

MI41 2 3 23 12 c.3 CH142 I 1 I3 13 c.3 CMIW 2 4 29 24 s.3 Cnl44 3 1 3b I5 .9 CMILS 4 12 104 20 1.2

CHUb CHl46A CH147 CM148 CM149

5 16 26 34 c.3 4 19 12 20 <.3 3 1 14 5 .9

1: 3 lb 13 .4 b la9 35 .J

cldiso CM51 Cim2 CM153 cm154

at155 Ml56 Ml57 CM158 Cnl59

CUl60 BE Ml60 CMtb1 CMK? CM163

CM164 CH165 CHlb6 CM67 PP168

<I Tl 2 .Ol Q 4 s2 s2 I c.5 <3 d Cl .07s.o01 r1 2 s.01 Z'.Ol <3 e.01 xl .Ol (2 e5 <I Q 3 2 ,018 2.13 lb <B ~2 4 23 ,7 33 r3 13 .02 ,011 la II .Ol 1224<.01 6 .28 .Ol .I6 10 <5 <I 18

: I 1 54 47 .77 43 46 5 ~8 a ~2 Q 4 6 26 20 <.5 c.5 6 16 d <3 3 2 .02 .02 -011 .006 25 18 18 10 .ot .Ol 1050*.01 1621e.01 <3 6 .18 .23<,01 .Ol .I7 .18 4 2 <5 <5 41 <I 433 242 2 <I M .a 5 a Q c 15 c.5 4 .3 1 .02 .007 lb 15 .Oi 12bZe.01 0 .19<.01 .I7 5 6 t 59

3 I 30 .52 6 15 3 2 33 c.5 a s3 5 .07 .0X8 14 10 .03 BB!<.Ol 4 .33x.01 -24 d2 s5 (1 2 I 70 1.56 IO f8 Q 2 13 s.5 G 3 21 .OB .Ohh I7 16 .03 b35<.01 -3 .388.01 .2h b d <I 1; 2 ‘I 35 .39 6 Q Q 2 21 <.5 d SJ 3 .04 .018 I9 10 .02 782g.01 0 .29<.01 .20 c2 ~5 (1 40 2 4 37 .38 3 4 Q 2 I5 c.5 0 4 3 .05 .020 I6 17 -02 889<.01 a .za<.ol .21 3 r5 4 469 2 1 39 .49 0 <a ~2 4 I2 <.5 3 0 I .02 .OO7 I4 9 .Ol lJbl<.Ol 0 .27<.01 .21 42 d <, 34

3 5 30 7 .3 4 Cl 9 9 .3 2 2 4 1‘ c.3 4 t 29 9 r.3 4 15 34 23 1.1

4 3 62 20 4.J 2 2 a II <.s 4 9 39 5 1.B 4 2 19 9 <.3 4 1 7 6 s.3

2 2 7 5 s.3 7. 3 7 4 c.3 2 4 9 a s.3

31 b 4 11 .3 3 4 2, la c.3

11 35 .50 a <a <2 3 24 s.5 b 4 2 .02 .007 20 14 .02 %9~.01 0 .25<.0, .20 5 6 4 I85

2 1 49 .49 5 <a <z 2 7 <.5 6 0 I .02 ,005 17 a -02 19as.0, d .28~.01 .22 2 6 Cl 2 Cl 29 .30 9 4 2 r2 I <.5 es 6 2 .Ol .004 6 14 .01 ll3~.01 0 .16<.01 .I1 4 6 %I BP: 2 4 34 .33 5 <a <2 2 9 1.5 <3 a 2 .02 ,002 7 9 -01 SOI~.O, 0 .t9<.01 .I3 e2 6 r1 137 2 4 45 .55 11 <B <Z 3 4 .5 J G 3 .02 ,006 9 la .Ol 67c.01 ~3 .t9<.01 .lb 4 <5 <l 195

3 <l 40 .5b 16 ~0 <2 5 15 <.5 <3 G 2 .02 .007 18 12 .Ol 229c.01 a3 .24<.Ol .19 d2 '5 2 27 2 ~1 129~ .92 4 Q s2 6 9 ..5 *3 0 5 .o, .OOh 3 I3 .Ol 2w.01 3 .2&.01 .24 4<5a, 5 2 1 109 .99 5 4 <2 J 17 e.5 c3 6 6 .O, .OOh 2 7 .Ol 4571.01 <3 .35<.01 .2b d2 i5 cl 130 : 1 I 141 48 1.00 .5a 5 9 4 d <2 ~2 3 2 35 to <.5 s.5 4 5 6 0 3 1 .07 .02 .023 .006 19 2 16 I2 .Ul .Ol ,681~.01 704s.01 <3 ~3 .31*-O, .2&.01 .20 .20 C2 6 *5 ~5 <I <I 67 ‘2

1 <I 35 .3e 9 Q s2 <2 9 c.5 d3 3 2 .02 .OOO 9 9 .Ol 51bq.01 <3 .17<.01 .lZ I s5 <t 944

: : 42 48 1.26 .57 21 4 4 ~8 Q Q 4 2 46 24 c.5 c.5 -3 24 <3 3 7 6 .03 01 .OOB .Ola 28 I9 18 a :Ol 02 1721<.01 910< 01 0 0 :15<.01 32<.01 .I3 .24 Q 9 <5 s5 iI <I

2 <l 132 .70 5 4 Q 6 P s.5 D <3 3 :03 ,005 I9 11 .02 4biOl (1 .32<.01 -27 2 <5 *I t Cl 85 .61 6 <a R 0 6 c.5 il ~3 1 .03 -004 26 18 .Ol 21e.01 3 .278.01 .IV 5 <5 (1 .:

2 4 41 .3a 3 t.3 <2 3 9 r.5 6 a *1 .04 .OOl 2 5 .ot 120<.01 0 .36<..01 -22 2 <5 <I s2 I 4 JP .37 h <B <2 3 V *.5 a 0 1 .03 .002 2 b .01 121c.01 0 .3B<.O, .23 3 6 4 Q 1 4 3t -46 0 <a <2 3 11 q.5 <3 4 I -03 .ooz 1 8 -01 7s.01 3 JOG01 .20 3 d <I 13 5 1 74 .66 5 ~8 <2 Q 6 <.5 3 6 6 .Ol .005 1 13 .Ol 337<.01 0 .>5~.01 .OB 13 d ~1 r2 2 Xl 759 .73 7 a i2 4 13 *.5 d c3 I .3b ,011 79 11 .07 72 .Ol 4 .t6 .O.? .t5 I c3 ~1 Q

I 1 7 11 c.3 2 I 669 .55 2 <iI s2 s 4 q.5 4 6 t .oa .012 31 7 .02 IOP<.Ol 3 .Y .Ol .31 <2 s5 <l J 10 a 53 c.3 6 8 560 2.83 2 CB Q 3 43 <.5 <3 6 5f 1.36 .llO 10 24 .93 II6 .04 6 I.21 -04 .I5 2~5~1 i 3 2, 0 45 a.3 24 13 547 2.71 2 ~8 ~2 2 77 g.5 4 6 IO4 .b5 .133 11 60 .44 II9 -29 7 .77 .la .lO d2 r5 cl a2 2 12 a lot a.3 10 I4 1487 3.W 6 c6 <2 3 58 <.5 3 6 69 .b5 .l(M 25 14 .62 214..15 8 .b7 .I4 .17 2 <5 al 62 3 2a 12 62 <.J 6 ,2l 5?? 4.23 6 4 ~2 2 28 <.5 4 3 (I2 .47 .I91 16 B 1.0s 145 .02 7 t.81 -05 .09 <2 e5 ~1 4

7 126 32 151 s-3 34 12 BOO 3.12 24 ~3 Q 4 26 5.4 5 5 72 .52 .088 17 I71 -58 160 .OB 13 1.72 .03 .14 4 5 <I 492

-

GROUP 10 - 0.50 GM SAMPLE LEACHED MT" J UL 2-2-2 HCL-HUO3-HZ0 Al 95 DEC. C f(IR OHE HOUR, O,L",EO TO 10 HL, A,,AL"BEO BV ICP-ES. UPPER LlHIlS - AC. AU, HG, u = 100 Pm: )ro. CO, CD, SB, 61, TB, v & a = 2,000 PPM; CU, PB, ZN, HI, MN, AS. V. LA, CR = 10.000 PPM. ASSAY RECWNDED POR ROCK AlID CORE WWLEO If C" W 2U AS > 1X, A0 > 30 PPll h II" > ,000 PPB . SAMPLE IWE: ROCK R,50 b0t AU** GROUP M - 30.00 G11 SAMPLE ANALYSIS 81 FA,,CP. Semles beaimins 'RE' mre Reruns end 'ME' we Reject Rerurt.

DATE RECBIVgD: M&I 27 2003 DATB REPORT MMLZDr SIDNED &.kz??p . IOYE, C.LEO"O, J. v*$lc; CER,,F,ED B.C. ASBllYERS

I

the lisbilities for actual cost b I the analysis only.

Page 25: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property
Page 26: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

G-l CMS37 CM38 cts39

" CHS40

j

CMS4I CMS42 CNS43 Cm.44 Cm45

RE 01545 EMS46 CMS47 STAUDARD DS4fAU-S

I\

-

F

Rencayd, Nathe 4 FILE # A301686 1Df LWWVl

No Cu Pb zn Ag Ni Co Mn Fe Ao II Au Ih Sr cd sb gi v ca P L.e cr fig aa li At Ha 'pnWppnPPppnPPPpnppn SmppnppnppnwmmPpnwn, x x$

K U II Hg Au- XFmPpn xppn x x ~ppnmppn wa

I 2 4 s6 ~3 5 3 487 1.74 ~2 <a ~2 4 60 1.4 4 a 32 .51 ,081 7 ZD .46 178 .lO 1 9

4 6 44 <.J

.04 .07 .I5 <5 4 2. 12 7 295 2.14

<2 5 4 r2 3 39 G.3 a ., 56 .26 ,078 15 22 .22 165 .I2

1 6 8 145 0 1.25 .02

.3 IL 8 470 .00 ~2 ~5 <I

2.13 4 4 ~2 2 24 .b 4 <J 47 .I(1 .267 10 Ib .I9 219 .DS .3 2 6

1.6, V V3 .3 1J 811

.02 .07 <2 <, 8 I.911

<5 1.: 4 4 ~2 2 24 s.5 d 3 47 .I6 .081 II 17 .17 366 .08 ~3 b 16 V 41 1.59 .02 .b 14 10 356 .OV ~2 <I 2.48 17 Cs ~2 6 35 c5 <.5 ~3

Y 60 .25 .077 7.

t4 23 .26 372 -11 1 2.00 .oz .09 s2 r5 <I 20.

I 0 10 90 .4 lb 8 634 2.69 5 d g2 3 36 <.5 <3 ~3 59 .27 ;187 13 26 .33 365 .I3 I 8 5 39

3 <.s 13 7

1.80 .02 .DV 260 2.26 6

<2 ~5 <, c3 e2 3 35 8.5 d 83 60 .22 .OTB 14 .22

<I 7 7 44 21 275 .12

4 12 ~3

7 2aV 2.20 1.53 .02 .08

6 *a ~2 ,2 ‘5 <, <:.

3 33 C.S e d3 57 -23 .091 I3 22 .20 292 .H e3 2 10 57

1.48 9 .3 15 7 277

.02 .06 ‘2 2.39 7

d <l ‘2 4 ~2 2 37 c.5 ~3 4 54 .27 -134 I7 4 7 2, .24 327 iI d .07 e3 26 7 3 179 1.55 1.82 3 .02 -08 <2 cl <a ~2 3 35 c5 6~

<.5 d a 42 26 .D66 16 I8 .l6 121 .I? <3 .a2 .02 -06 <2 c5 <I <2

Cl 6 6 25 c.3 7 3 173 I.50 4 a <2 2 34 c.5 ~3 U 40 .2b .Ub5 14 16 .I7 II6 :I0 II 7 7 32 a 8.3 10 .79 .02 5 210 I.88 .06 5 4 ~2 e5 41 i. <2 2 IT6 d.5 <3 iJ 49 .25 ,091 <I 7 5 30 e.3 15 20 .I7 141 .10 IO 5 227 G 1.89 5 1.11 .02 .ob 88 ~2 3 <Z

35 s.5 <s <, Q

0 ~3 UI .27 ,075 15 6 122 29 150 21 .IV 139 .I1 <.J 35 11 ‘3 7-VI 3.23 1.14 .02 23 ~8 *2 .06 r;! <I 3 27 5.4 6

d 2 5 72 .51 .OVl I7 156 .57 146 -00 <3 I.68 .(13 -15 5 4 <‘I 5”

All results are canridered the confidmtiel property of the client. Acme BSS~SS the ligbilitjgg for actual CDSt of the gnalySiS Dn[V. Da& 71 _

Page 27: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

A%E~A&<LYTICAL LABORAT$XIES LTD. 852 E. HASTINGS ST. VANCOUVER BC V6A lR6 IS0 9002 Accredited Co.)

PIiONE(604~)?53-3,158 FAZ(604)253:&7+

f GEOCHEMICAL~AN

', P( :IS CERTIFICATE

'Kencavd,, N&then File # A30?.0?6,,:, 2 _ 4334 Hart Huy, Prince'George BC V2K 227 Wmitted,by;,'Nathen Kencayd

.&&:, ( ",

SAMPLE# MO tu Pb Zn Ag Ni Co Mn Fe AS U AU Th Sr Cd Sb Bi " ca P La CP Mg Ba Ti B Al Na K w TL Hg All**

G-l Ml01 "lo2 Ml03 Ml04

Ml05 Ml06 Ml07 "108 Ml09

m w w PW Pp” Pp” PW Pp” % Ppn Pp" Pp" Pp" Pp"PpnPp"Pp" Ppn % % PW PFm % PFm xppn % % % ppn ppn ppn ppb

1 3 <3 42 s.3 4 4 504 1.74 <2 4 c2 4 74 c.5 <3 s3 37 .50 .075 7 36 .50 240 .13 <3 .84 .07 .41 c2 *5 il <2 1 15 7 73 s.3 13 8 675 2.30 3 ~8 ~2 2 45 c.5 13 ~3 46 .48 .041 14 17 .42 150 .IO ~3 1.54 .o2 .,o <2 <5 <I <2 1 25 7 52 <.3 12 6 540 1.84 9 d3 ~2 <2 64 c.5 ~3 ~3 31 .98 .o56 15 16 .39 242 .ob <3 1.19 .02 .09 <2 <5 cl <2

1 14 8 126 c.3 9 5 586 1.79 7 C8 c2 2 42 c.5 ~3 <3 44 .63 .I09 1, 17 .23 259 .o7 <3 I.02 ,o2 .o7 <2 <5 <, 5

1 13 9 52 c.3 7 5 260 1.58 6 4 c2 2 34 c.5 ~3 ~3 30 .42 ,064 9 14 .25 143 .07 <3 1.21 .01 .06 <2 <5 <, 2

2 22 12 103 c.3 11 10 1201 2.52 12 4 ~2 2 46 c.5 <3 ~3 54 .78 ,109 13 18 .42 205 .07 <3 1.71 .02 .07 <2 ~5 ~1 3 1 6 7 45 c.3 9 5 235 1.58 6 43 ~2' 2 27 <.5 c3 e3 36 .32 ,091 11 15 .20 138 .07 <3 .98 .Ol .05 <2 <5 <I 5 1 5 6 48 c.3 4 3 196 1.06 2 ~8 *2 ~2 23 <.5 ~3 ~3 26 .23 .053 8 11 .I3 116 .05 <3 .69 .Ol .05 <2 ~5 <I ~2 1 6 6 74 s.3 8 6 575 1.75 5 4 <2 2 24 c.5 ~3 ~3 42 .24 .126 12 lb .,b 162 .07 ~3 .84 .Ol .07 ~2 <5 ~1 4 1 12 7 58 c.3 9 6 455 1.80 9 C8 <2 2 36 c.5 ~3 ~3 45 .38 .,OO 15 16 .29 144 .09 13 1.01 .02 .07 ~2 15 ~1 6

Cl 4 6 44 <.3 4 4 174 .97 2 -Z8 <2 2 23 <.5 <3 <3 26 .,9 ,064 ,, 9 .I2 123 .07 <3 .53 .O, .o5 <2 <5 <, <2 1 7 6 68 c.3 9 6 299 1.94 ? C8 <2 2 29 S.5 <3 <3 53 .23 ,167 12 16 ,,4 158 .o7 <3 1.26 J, ,,,b <2 <5 <, 18

16 5 96 c.3 7 4 224 1.63 4 ~8 ~2 2 29 <.5 <3 <3 40 .2, ,168 10 14 ~2 137 ~7 <3 ,94 ,o, .05 <2 <5 <, c2

1 7 5 48 c.3 8 5 340 1.63 4 4 <2 2 28 1.5 <3 ‘3 40 .27 .,I, 1, 14 .20 140 .~,a <3 .94 ,o, .07 <2 <5 <, <2

1 8 5 48 c.3 8 5 326 1.52 3 4 c2 2 27 c.5 c3 s3 38 .25 .,,3 1, 15 .,9 129 .08 <3 I.02 ,o, .07 <2 <5 <, 2

1 8 5 43 c.3 8 6 340 1.88 4 4 -c2 3 32 c.5 ~3 ~3 51 .29 .087 13 18 .22 117 .I1 <3 .97 .01 .07 ~2 -c5 ~1 ~2 6 125 31 156 c.3 34 12 761 3.12 23 ~8 <2 4 27 5.3 4 5 70 .50 .089 15 170 .58 139 .08 c3 1.78 .03 .13 3 <5 Cl 49

RoUP 10 - 0.50 GM SAMPLE LEACHED NIT" 3 ML 2-2-2 HCL-HN03-H20 AT 95 DEG. C FOR ONE HOUR, DILUTED TO IO ML, ANALYSED BY ICP-ES. UPPER LIMITS - At, A", HG, U = 100 PPM; MO, CO, CO, SB, BI, TH, " & B = 2,000 PPM; C", PB, ZN, NI, MN, AS, V, LA, CR = 10,000 WM.

SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL SS80 60C AU** GROUP 38 - 30.00 GM SAMPLE ANALYSIS BY FA,ICP. SampLes beginning 'RE' are Reruns and 'ME' are Reiect Reruns.

DATE RECEIVED: JUN 19 2003 DATE REPORT MAILED: TOYE, C.LEONG, J. WANG; CERTIFlEO B.C. ASSAYERS

ALI results are considered the confidential property of the client. Acme assumes the liabilities for actual cost of the analysis only. D&A _

Page 28: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

SAMPLEtl 1 no cu Pb 2n A9 Ni Co Mn Fe As U Au Tti Sr Cd Sb 8i V Ca P La Cr Mg 8a Ti 8 Al Na K u TI Hg Au'*

SI CM169 CM170 CH171 CM172

CH173 CM174 CM175 CM176 CM177

CM178 CM179 CM180 RE CM180 CM181

CH182 CH183 CM184 CM185 CH186

CH187 STANOARO OS4,AWR

P PpmppnPpmPpn Ppn Ppn Ppn % PW Ppn WPpn PFm Ppn Ppn PpnPpn % %ppnPpn %m %Ppn % % %ppnppnppm wb

4 <l <3 Sl c.3 4 *1

: 2 1 22 12 11 7 c.3 <.3 1 1 Xl *1 1 1 8 11 x.3 -4 1

54 ~1 22 125 .3 2 4

2 4 15 8 s.3 1 4 3 4 12 11 *.3 2 1 1 1 11 14 g.3 1 1 3 4 12 11 s.3 1 4 2 2 9 10 q.3 1 1

3 .02 20 .39

1:: .73 .71

9619 2.82

90 .66 14 <8 <2 3 11 <.5 <3 <3 2 160 .64 6 *8 <2 3 6 <.5 ~3 ~3 3 168 .75 7 ~8 ~2 4 15 s.5 ~3 <3 6 195 1.oa ~2 ~8 <2 4 5 q.5 ~3 ~3 6

57 .68 9 *8 ~2 4 5 g.5 *3 <3 4

~2 ~8 ~2 =z2 2 c.5 *3 <3 1 5 8 <2 6 11 <.5 <3 ~3 2 2 <8 <2 3 5 c.5 <3 <3 5 3 ~8 <2 4 7 <.5 <3 <3 2

12 16 <2 2 37 1.4 <3 <3 -4

.09 s.001

.04 .004

.03 .007

.03 .006 4.69 .020

.05 ,003

.03 .004

.03 .009

.03 ,009

.03 .OlO

<l 2 c.01 2 s.01 *3 .Ol .48 20 2 .02 257 e.01 <3 .28 .Ol 10 10 .02 91 .Ol 3 .34 .Ol

5 <l .02 362 c.01 ~3 .33 s.01 20 5 .79 212 g.01 7 .34 .Ol

3 1 .Ol 62 <.Ol ~3 .33 c.01 2 11 .Ol 33 c.01 3 .36 s.01

10 3 .02 983 .Ol 5 .32 c.01 12 12 .02 366 .Ol 3 .40 c.01 11 2 .02 148 s.01 <3 .36 c.01

.Ol <2 *5 *1

.22 <2 <5 Cl

.29 2 <5 <l

.31 2 <5 <l

.23 5 <5 <l

.28 <2 <5 2

.30 4 <5 3

.27 <2 ~5 4

.31 2 <5 4

.28 <2 <5 <l

3 1 11 15 c.3 1 1 440 .82 3 ~8 ~2 4 6 s.5 ~3 13 3 .03 ,005 6 10 .02 100 c.01 3 .38 e.01 .33 3 <5 4 3 2 13 17 s.3 2 1 328 .85 7 *8 ~2 4 4 q.5 <3 <3 3 .03 ,010 7 9 .Ol 44 .Ol <3 .33 s.01 .28 3 ~5 4

Sl 15 <3 57 <.3 9 10 684 3.15 3 ~8 ~2 2 42 C.5 *3 C3 65 1.00 ,123 10 21 1.16 150 .08 ~3 1.24 .09 .17 2 5 <I <l 14 <3 57 g.3 8 10 674 3.11 ~2 *8 ~2 2 42 .6 <3 ~3 65 .99 .119 9 26 1.14 148 .08 4 1.23 .09 .16 <2 <5 4

2 11 <3 66 .3 7 9 817 3.00 3 *8 ~2 3 37 c.5 *3 <3 61 .70 .122 14 14 .91 125 .09 6 1.41 .06 .14 2 <5 4

<I 13 ~3 61 c.3 6 8 481 3.00 *2 <8 ~2 2 36 <.5 <3 ~3 62 .58 .116 12 9 1.20 128 .09 4 1.24 .08 .12 <2 <5 1 1 15 <3 57 c.3 6 8 433 2.79 ~2 ~8 ~2 2 33 s.5 ~3 ~3 60 .52 ,117 11 15 .96 121 .OIl <3 1.10 .08 .ll <2 6 2

<l 53 <3 64 c.3 112 35 993 5.10 3 <8 <2 <2 255 c.5 <3 ~3 24 2.63 .138 10 15 3.21 64 .07 <3 4.12 .48 .17 5 <5 4 2 28 ~3 53 s.3 27 17 572 3.04 6 ~8 ~2 2 87 c.5 ~3 ~3 110 .74 .131 13 55 .83 154 .27 ~3 .85 .20 .14 ~2 c5 4

~1 38 3 37 c.3 28 19 1209 3.39 2 ~8 ~2 5 66 s.5 g3 ~3 67 .94 .177 26 27 .41 70. .Ol <3 1.13 .04 .ll <2 5 4

*2 39

3 2

34

2 2

<2 2 3

4 <2 <2

3 <2

<2 3 2 2 5

4 <l 12 <3 159 c.3 9 16 1834 2.34 13 4 ~2 2 11 c.5 ‘3 <3 54 .19 .059 17 7 .72 379 g.01 *3 1.29 .05 .13 4 <5 ~1 7 127 30 150 s.3 34 12 801 3.13 25 ~8 ~2 3 27 5.6 5 5 74 .53 .089 17 159 .59 145 .08 4 1.74 .03 .16 6 ~5 4 493

CROUP 1D . 0.50 GM SAMPLE LEACHED WTH 3 ML 2-2-2 HCL-HN03-HZ0 AT 95 DEG. C FOR ONE HOUR, OlLUTEO TO 10 ML, ANALYSED By ICP-ES. UPPER LIMITS - At, AU, HG, V = 100 PPM; MO, CO, CD, SS, 81, TH, " 8 8 = 2,000 PPM; C", PB, ZN, N,, MN, AS, Y, LA, CR = 10,000 PPM. ASSAY RECOMMENDED FOR ROCK AND CORE SAMPLES IF CU PS 2N AS ) 1X, AG > 30 PPM B A" > 1000 PP8 - SAMPLE TYPE: ROCK R150 60C AU" GROUP 38 - 30.00 GM SAMPLE ANALYSIS By FA,ICP. Samder beginning 'RE' are Rerun* and 'RRE' are Reiect Reruns.

DATE RECEIVED: JUN 19 2003 DATE REPORT MAILED: D. TOYE, C.LEONG, J. WANG; CERTIFIED B.C. ASSAYERS

1

All results are considered the confidential property of the client. Acme assuws the liabilities for actual cost of the analysis only. Da&A hl,

Page 29: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

Ppn PVPW PpmPtiPpmPpn ppn ~ppnPpnPwppn Ppn ppn PpnppnPpn x x PpnPpn x Ppn XPpn x x Xppnppnppn ppb

SI 4 4 <3 *I <.3 4 4 16 .07 <2 4 <2 <2 3 1.6 43 <3 1 .I0 .OOl 4 3 .04 3 c.01 13 .02 .50 .Ol <2 <5 4 2 "188 4 3 3 105 <.3 8 18 ,259 1.72 3 4 <2 3 7 e.5 -z3 <3 34 .,6 .055 10 10 .47 274 c.0, 3 .83 .06 .09 e2 <5 1 <2 Ml89 1 2 <3 34 q.3 17 11 872 1.39 2 43 <2 7 16 <.5 <3 ~3 20 .09 .022 10 8 .I0 89 .02 c3 .29 .05 .09 <2 4 <I s2 CH190 <I 2 47 12 <.3 1 1 30 .34 5 4 <2 <2 10 c.5 43 <3 2 .05 .020 10 3 .02 462 e.01 ~3 .23 <.Ol .I6 ~2 ~5 <I 8 Ml91 1 4 5 168 g.3 31 26 2386 5.86 c2 4 ~2 3 7 s.5 -G3 <3 135 .47 .,03 17 43 1.52 73 .04 ~3 1.78 .03 .I0 2 ~5 4 ~2

CM192 ; 12: ;: 15: .6 4 *I 30 .63 8 4 12 5 9 e.5 a ~3 5 .04 .022 24 3 .02 142 <.Ol ~3 .I9 c.01 .l6 6 ~5 4 ~2 STANOARO OS41AU-R .5 35 12 791 3.11 23 ~3 ~2 4 28 5.3 6 5 77 .54 .090 17 170 .59 146 .09 4 1.75 .04 .I7 5 ~5 <I 471

5 ORWP 10 - 0.50 GM SAMPLE LEACHED V,TH 3 "L 2-2-2 HCL-HN03-HZ0 AT 95 DEG. C FOR ONE HWR, DILUTED TO 10 ML, ANALYSED BY ICP-ES. UPPER LIMITS - AC. AU, HG, " = 100 PPM; MO, CO, CO, SB, BI, TH, U & B = 2,000 PPH: CU. PB, ZN, "1, MN, AS, Y, LA, CR = 10,000 WM. ASSAY RECOMHENOEO FOR ROCK AND CORE SAMPLES IF CU PB ZN AS > 1%. AC F 30 PP" &AU > 1000 PPB - SAMPLE TYPE: ROCK RI50 60C AU" GROUP 38 - 30.00 GM SAMPLE A,,ALYSIS BY FA,,CP.

DATE RECEIVED: JUN 30 2003 DATE REPORT IO 03 I

SIGNED ,,.c- . TOYE, C.LEONG, J. UANG; CERTIFIED B.C. ASSAYERS

All results we considered the confidential property of the client. Acme assumes the liabilities for actual cost of the analysis only. Oata- FA _

Page 30: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

C-l Ml30 Ml31 Ml32 Ml33

Ml34 Ml35 Ml36 Ml37 Ml38 n Ml39 Ml40 HI41 Ml43 Ml44

Ml61 Ml62 Ml63 Hlb4 STANDARD DS4/AU-S

1 4 d 37 <.3 6 4 523 1.84 <2 9 <2 5 70 s.5 ~3 ~3 40 .55 .083 7 32%.54 3~ 12 4 .93 .08 .43 2 <5 4 a 5 3 85 s.3 9 5 632 1.85 2 11 i2 2 26 c.5 ~3 ~3 45 .25 .086 10 21 .I8 %I : 07 e3 1.11 .Ol .lO 2 <5 4

.57 98 .I0 <3 1.59 .02 .I3 2 <5 4

.46 102 .08 <3 1.47 .02 .I1 ~2 <5 4 Cl 22 3 49 s.3 14 9 539 2.40 3 ~8 <2 2 41 .5 <3 <3 54 .52 ,063 16 17 Cl a 5 53 s.3 12 8 520 1.92 2 ~8 <2 ~2 30 s.5 ~3 ~3 42 .38 ,108 9 17

1 6 5 46 .4 9 7 502 2.28 2 12 i2 2 23 s.5 ~3 3 56 .25 ,051 10 20 .23 101 .06 ~3 1.15 .Ol .09 2 ~5 4

Cl 11 c3 73 s.3 11 9 976 2.48 <2 11 <2 2 31 s.5 ~3 ~3 57 .33 .068 13 23 1 32 3 137 d.3 22 24 4372 6.23 4 ~8 ~2 ~2 31 .6 3 ~3 108 .62 .I21 15 24

0 36 4 124 .4 17 13 1945 3.46 4 <8 ~2 2 24 q.5 3 x3 84 .37 .089 16 29 CF 20 5 119 .4 13 14 2975 3.65 <2 <8 ~2 3 32 .6 ~3 3 87 .62 .I41 15 19 ~1 78 ~3 155 .6 12 13 2987 2.71 <2 <8 -z2 2 44 x.5 s3 3 60 .72 .136 27 24

Cl 1 <3 120 x.3 8 14 3218 3.96 4 <8 ~2 2 14 .5 3 4 44 .35 .172 18 10 1.69 154 .Ol <3 2.35 .Ol .32 3 <5 1 14 1 8 3 58 .4 12 10 1906 2.46 2 X8 <2 ~2 34 ~5 ~3 ~3 52 .57 .096 IO 26 .20 231 .04 c3 1.01 .Ol .19 2 c5 4 <2 2 16 13 107 .4 27 18 368, 4.38 14 <8 ~2 2 28 s.5 ~3 ~3 122 .59 .126 11 49 .6d 279 .14 ~3 1.51 .04 .I8 3 <5 4 <2

Cl 3 6 112 .4 22 17 4050 4.28 <2 10 ~2 2 17 <.5 <3 <3 49 .27 .,,8 12 36 .17 306 .02 <3 .73 .Ol .25 3 ,<5 4 x2 1 3 12 70 s.3 15 15 2025 3.21 3 <a s2 2 16 C.5 <3 <3 79 .27 .,05 12 3, .50 188 .06 13 1.10 .02 .I5 ~2 ~5 4 <2

Cl 2 3 65 <.3 16 16 2181 3.09 5 <8 <2 3 24 c.5 *3 3 74 .26 .079 11 35 .58 159 .03 <3 1.11 .Ol .21 2 <5 4 2 11 8 203 .6 22 26 7605 5.03 4 ~8 ~2 2 37 .5 c3 3 81 .97 .196 37 45 .88 420 .02 4 2.36 s.01 .32 <2 <5 <I 3 78 ~3 284 .6 32 43 6204 7.15 7 -z8 <2 2 49 1.3 3 <3 107 .86 .216 24 44 .94 424 .06 <3 2.70 .Ol .25 q2 <5 1

Cl 12 5 90 .4 7 10 1666 1.59 <2 <a <2 2 32 s.5 ~3 ~3 33 .33 .214 11 18 .13 279 .06 4 1.03 .Ol .07 2 ~5 4 1 9 <3 119 .4 18 15 2132 3.72 5 <8 <2 3 25 c.5 <3 ~3 73 .42 .I29 19 33 .46 235 .07 5 1.84 .02 .I6 2 ~5 4

Cl 9 ~3 72 s.3 11 9 1174 1.88 <2 IO <2 2 43 c.5 <3 3 45 .63 ,143 12 20 .20 203 .07 3 1.07 .02 .08 2 <5 <l Cl 66 *3 78 .5 45 14 1340 5.22 43 15 ~2 6 a0 1.0 c3 s3 95 .a3 .070 50 53 .62 441 .09 ~3 4.76 .03 .26 2 ~5 4

1 4 3 42 s.3 7 6 362 1.68 ~2 13 ~2 2 25 s.5 ~3 <3 47 .28 .036 1, 16 .21! 108 .09 3 1.01 .02 .08 s2 <5 *1 Cl 7 5 38 .4 8 6 572 1.69 3 ~8 <2 3 32 c.5 *3 ~3 43 .37 ,023 14 18 .20 122 .09 6 1.03 .03 .08 ~2 <5 <I <I 7 6 37 .3 8 6 562 1.68 4 12 <2 3 32 s.5 ~3 ~3 44 .37 .023 13 18 .20 122 .09 8 1.02 .03 .08 2 <5 1

Cl 7 6 56 c.3 12 5 224 1.69 4 8 c2 2 25 c.5 <3 <3 41 .26 ,145 11 17 .24 112 .08 6 1.36 .02 .07 2 <5 <I <2 Cl 7 3 147 g.3 13 7 507 1.85 3 S8 <2 2 26 c.5 ~3 ~3 42 .27 ,207 11 20 .25 184 .07 ~3 1.65 .Ol .08 3 ~5 ~1 6

1 7 4 40 .3 IO 5 238 1.78 6 <8 ~2 3 22 C.5 S3 <3 55 .21 .092 10 20 .I4 204 .09 6 1.07 .02 .07 ~2 ~5 <I 2 Cl 6 8 37 q.3 8 5 407 1.67 5 IO ~2 3 21 q.5 <3 ~3 48 .23 .,03 1, 19 .14 199 .09 7 .92 .02 .07 2 15 4 <2

1 7 6 47 .4 IO 6 307 1.85 9 C8 s2 2 24 c.5 <3 ~3 48 .24 ,087 10 20 .21 185 .08 8 1.18 .02 .08 ~2 <5 1 2

4 8 9 37 .3 8 5 333 1.74 8 <a ~2 2 32 s.5 <3 <3 45 .36 '.023 ,2 14

.28 176 .08 3 1.30 .02 .20 2 c5 4 1.37 209 .07 ~3 2.24 .02 .20 3 es 1

.64 130 .06 7 2.00 .Ol .22 3 <5 4

.69 218 .06 <3 1.99 .Ol .23 3 ~5 <l

.41s 331 .05 6 1.99 .Ol .13 4 s5 4

4 9 7 34 c.3 9 4 220 1.84 6 12 <2 2 38 *.5 ~3 ~3 38 .4b .023 14 20 ~1 10 14 42 s.3 9 5 284 1.86 9 11 <2 3 37 q.5 <3 <3 38 .46 ,053 15 27 Cl 6 5 44 q.3 7 5 279 1.63 6 <8 ~2 2 18 g.5 *3 S3 46 .19 ,052 13 18

4 123 30 150 .4 33 12 839 3.06 21 IO ~2 4 27 5.3 5 5 74 .53 ,088 17 162 .59 144 .08 3 1.74 .04 .16 5 ~5 4 5,

.28 138 .lO 5 .98 .03 .09 <2 <5 4

.32 127 .09 6 .99 .03 .09 <2 <5 4

.30 151 .08 6 1.16 .04 .I1 <2 <5 <I

.I5 89 .lO 3 .92 .02 .07 <2 ~5 1

14 2 4 6

<2 <2 c2 <2 <2

: <2 <2

2

: 3 2

<2

2 *2

2 4

GRWP 10 - 0.50 CM SAMPLE LEACHED WITH 3 ML 2-2-2 HCL-HNOJ-H2O AT 95 DEG. C FOR ONE HWR, 0,t"TED TO IO ML, ANALYSED BY ICP-ES. UPPER LIMITS - AG, A", HG, U = 100 PPH; HO, CO, CO, SE, 81, TH, U 8. B = 2,000 PPM; C", PB, ZN, N,, HN, AS, V, LA, CR = 10,000 PPM. - SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL 5580 60C AU" CRWP 38 _ 30.00 GM SAMPLE ANALYSIS BY FA,ICP. San!oles beginning 'RE' we Reruns end 'RRE' are Reject Reruns. _ D

DATE RECEIVED: JUN 30 2003 DATE REPORT MAILED94 43 SIGNED ,,c.II,, . . . . . . . . . . 0. TOYE, C.LEONG, J. UANC; CERTIFIED B.C. ASSAYERS

v I J ALL results are considered the confidential property of the client. Acme a~sunes the Liabilities for actual cos of the analysis only.

Page 31: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

GROUP 6 - PREClOUS METALS BY FIRE ASSAY FROM 1 A.T. SAMPLE, ANALYSlS BY ICP-ES. SAMPLE TYPE: ROCK PULP

DATE RECEIVED: JUL 11 2003 DATE REPORT MAILED:

All rewkts are considered the confidential property of the client. Acme aswmes the Liabilities for actual cost of the analysis only.

Page 32: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

ANALYTICAL LABORATCRIES LTD.

m PpnPpnPpmPpmPWPpm PW % PW PW Ppn Ppm Ppn Ppm Ppm Ppm Ppm

SI :1 3 <3 3 <.3 I 1 8 .06 ~2 ~8 ~2 ~2 2 c.5 <3 3 2 .13 q.001 Cl 7 .02 MI93 3 10 <3 83 c.3 lb 42 1994 10.55 6 <a c2 <2 7 .5 <3 4 108 .24 .078 I3 22 .7a "194 2 2 5 52 c.3 9 8 3484 5.06 2 4 c2 C2 18 c.5 <3 ~3 90 2.79 .062 9 45 .52 Ml95 3 I23 7 93 <.3 5 8 3299 3.19 b <a <2 ~2 7 c.5 Ib ~3 I5 .OE .037 I5 9 .04 Ml96 2 ,203 IO 70 .5 5 3 2542 3.39 IO <a <2 2 12 c.5 92 ~3 29 .12 .049 7 6 .02

CM197 2 33 216 43 3.7 2 2 36 .38 7 4 x2 3 26 1.0 4 ~3 2 .02 .OI 1203 c.01 ~3 .21 <.OI .I3 <2 c5 2 500 MI98 18 46 11 42 s.3 18 II 98 1.50 430 4 <2 5 34 1.5 c3 <3 73 .32 .I7 90 .09 <3 .82 .08 .I7 <2 c5 Cl 5

ul99 1 3 12 I65 c.3 2 21 3213 5.75 IO ~8 ~2 ~2 13 c.5 <3 ~3 454 1.44 I.54 6, .I2 ~3 I.61 .02 .12 c2 c5 <I M200 2 336 ~3 53 c.3 3 7 1154 3.17 <2 4 <2 2 3 <.5 ~3 <3 29 .I4 .65 a3 .04 <3 1.02 .03 .I3 -c2 c5 Cl M201 3 8 <3 66 c.3 2 2 1078 2.57 <2 <B <2 ~2 4 c.5 <3 <3 8 .09 .37 139 q.01 <3 1.10 .04 .I6 ~2 4 ~1

.006 13 6 .I57 14 65 ,119 9 3 .053 18 3 ,034 21 4

"202 1 42 c3 40 S.3 2 3 ,767 1.77 ~2 ~8 ~2 ~2 3 c.5 <3 <3 3 .I4 .034 3, 6 I79 c.01 <3 .75 .02 .20 <2 c5 Cl 4 M203 t 742 4 67 c.3 4 8 ,442 3.18 ~2 ~8 ~2 3 I3 c.5 ~3 ~3 26 .33 .055 I7 9 412 .03 4 1.20 .03 .18 <2 -z5 <I b M204 4 33 <3 89 .3 3 19 ,650 7.21 2 <a <2 ~2 7 c.5 ~3 ~3 159 .40 125 .Ol ~3 2.18 .02 .I7 <2 <5 Cl ; RE M204 3 33 3 92 c.3 3 I9 1706 7.40 <2 ~8 ‘2 ~2 7 c.5 ~3 ~3 I63 .42 :,a7 181 I4 14 7 I 130 .OI c3 2.25 .02 .I7 c2 4 Cl <2 M205 2 3 3 I49 c.3 1 I7 2377 7.37 2 <8 ~2 <2 IO <.5 ~3 <3 I,, .53 .231 I5 5 I09 .03 <3 2.54 .03 .I2 c2 <5 <I <2

M206 3 56 c3 90 .3 2 I7 2339 6.73 3 4 c2 <2 8 c.5 <3 <3 133 .50 .I96 .'I8 2 .94 476 .06 ~3 1.63 .03 .14 c2 c5 Cl 3 ,go7 17 4097 x3 49 1.0 2 lb 1592 3.99 2 4 <2 2 10 <.5 4 5 59 .63 .319 I9 3 .20 329 .O2 8 .b1 .Ol .22 c2 c5 Cl 30 CM208 2 26 30 9 .3 1 1 46 .29 9 4 <2 2 lb c.5 ~3 ~3 2 .02 .007 1 IO .Ol 425 c.01 <3 .20 c.01 .I9 c2 -c5 Cl 22 CM209 1 11 I2 b <.3 1 I 37 .37 I3 <a <2 c2 16 <.5 <3 <3 2 .02 .004 I 2 .Ol 520 c.01 ~3 .24 <.Ol .20 c2 c5 Cl 12 MZIO 5 7 <3 142 .3 18 19 1898 10.67 4 4 <2 2 7 c.5 <3 <3 109 .I5 .080 6 40 I.54 145 .14 c3 2.16 .03 .I2 4 <5 Cl 2

"211 !7 8 44 I4 I.6 6 3 32 .59 155 a c2 c2 20 c.5 6 ~3 IO .04 ,042 4 B .02 234 x.01 ~3 .28 e.01 .21 <2 c5 Cl 530 STANDARD 13 145 25 137 .3 26 13 787 3.04 I8 9 <2 3 49 5.7 4 6 62 .76 .097 13 I87 .69 143 .lO lb 2.14 .04 .15 4 <5 cl 497

14

standard is STANDARD DSS/AU-R. GROW 10 - 0.50 GM SAMPLE LEACHED V,TH 3 ML 2-2-2 "CL-"N03-"20 AT 95 DEG. C FOR ONE HOUR, OlLUYED TO IO ML, ANALYSED BY ICP-ES. UPPER LIMIYS AG, A". HC, !d = 100 PPM; MO, CO, CD, SB, BI, TH, u a B = 2,000 PPM; CU. PB, ZN, LII, MN, AS, v, LA, CR = 10,000 WM. ASSAY RECOMMENDED FOR ROCK AND CORE SAMPLES IF C" PB ZN AS > m, At > 30 PPM & A" > 1000 PPB - SAMPLE TYPE: ROCK RI50 bOC AU'* GROW 38 - 30.00 GM SAMPLE ANALYSlS BY FA,ICP. Samples beginning 'RE' are Reruns and 'WE' are Reiect Reruns.

Ppn % Ppm

3 x.01 <3 74 .OP <3 84 .05 x3

390 .Ol <3 568 .03 <3

.02 .57 .OI <2 x5 <I 2 1.35 .01 .I6 ~2 ~5 <I 3

.77 .03 .I2 c2 <5 -3 4 .26 .Ol .22 c2 <5 <I 4 .24 c.01 .23 2 ~5 ~1 3

600 900 800

,000

2100 700

1400 1100

500

1100 800

1900

800

800 BOO 600 900

1000

,700

DATE RECEIVED: JUL 21 2003 DATE REPORT MAILED: SIGNED 0. TOYE, C.LEONG, J. WANG; CERTIFlEO B.C. ASSAYERS

'/, Ppn Ppn Ppn wb sfm

All results are considered the confidential property of the client. Acme assumes the Liabilities for actual cost of the analysis only. oata- FA __

Page 33: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

&Au5 AEI&ITL.u& lA3J5”IuY~“xIBs,: IrTU. 9002 Accredited Co.\

PHONE(604),253~-,3158,

‘\ 2 _ 4334~ Hart Huy, Prince George EC VZK,227 S&misted by: Nafhen Keticayd

I MO cu Pb 2n A9 Ni Co Mn Fe AS u AU Th ST Cd Sb Bi V Ca P La Cr Mg Ba Ti B AL Ya K U TL Ho Au** Sample SAMPLE# P Ppn lw PWPpnPpnPpn w % PFm Ppn Pp" PpnPpn PFm Ppn PFmPpm % %ppnPpn % Ppn % Pp" % % % PW w ppn ppb

.01 .44 c.01 c2 <5 Cl <2 .24 .Ol .18 ~2 *5 ~1 32 .21 c.01 .I8 <2 <5 12 137 .17 *.01 .12 <2 c5 3 55 .20 c.01 .I5 <2 S5 C? 12

gm 700

1800 1100 1000

1500 ,900 1500

900 100

1700 1100

51 CM212 CM213 CM214 CM216

CM217 CM218 CM219 M220 CM221

RE CM221' e4 CM222

"j,

HZ23 r

STANDARD DS5/AU-R

/I

Cl 2 <3 3 c.3 <I Cl 7 .03 <2 4 <2 ii! 2 c.5 <3 <3 Cl .09 c.001 <1 ‘1 G.01 2 <.01 c3 1 10 15 20 .3 Cl 1 65 .37 8 *8 c2 4 19 c.5 <3 <3 2 .02 ,004 18 2 .02 943 1.01 <3 2 12 103 689 2.9 4 ~1 29 .30 3 *8 ~2 3 8 7.5 <3 <3 1 .o, ,003 8 2 .Ol 371 c.01 <3 2 5 69 187 2.1 -cl 2 20 .27 4 4 ~2 2 97 .7 <3 <3 1 .Ol ,002 6 3 .Ol 1979 c.01 3 3 4 42 8 c.3 Cl <l 17 .48 28 4 <2 <2 11 *.5 x3 <3 1 .Ol ,003 1 4 .Ol 237 c.01 ~3

26 23 48 18 .4 1 1 570 .a5 10 15 <2 2 11 S.5 5 <3 2 .01 .006 1 2 .01 69 c.01 ~3 2 35 8 68 c.3 28 17 354 2.59 2 4 <2 4 65 q.5 ~3 <3 106 .6l .154 20 71 .28 99 .13 <3 2 2 13 9<.3 2 1 30 .51 24 4 <2 3 21 <.5 <3 <3 3 .02 ,006 3 3 .Ol 704 c.01 <3 5 55 7 14 c.3 3 5 70 1.66 5 4 c2 4 8 c.5 c3 c3 2 .01 ,012 19 1 .02 145 q.01 <3 7 331 4 49 ‘.3 3 3 1510 2.44 ~2 <8 ~2 3 6 c.5 ~3 ~3 8 .OB ,029 22 2 .I7 53 x.01 S3

7 328 3 48 s.3 3 2 1510 2.44 <2 ~8 (2 4 6 c.5 ~3 ~3 8 .09 .029 22 2 .17 52 c.01 ~3 .58 .03 .28 <2 <5 1 2 4 6 11 7 1.3 1 <I 55 1.04 10 ~8 <2 4 11 q.5 <3 <3 5 .05 ,005 2 1 .Ol 25 c.01 ~3 .33 .01 .23 4 <5 Cl 3 5 484 5 25 c.3 4 5 1107 1.52 <2 4 <2 3 5 <.5 *3 <3 4 .OP .038 28 3 .03 48 c.01 <3 .35 .04 .27 ~2 ~5 <I 5

13 145 24 138 .3 25 13 792 2.99 18 4 <2 3 49 5.6 4 6 61 .77 .098 13 191 .68 142 .10 16 2.13 .04 .15 5 c5 Cl 491 -

.23 .01 .15 <2 ~5 2 10

.75 .ll .17 <2 ‘5 c, 2

.27 c.01 .I7 <2 ~5 ~1 6

.36 <.Ol .27 <2 ~5 ~1 3

.59 .03 .2a <2 <5 4 2

GROUP 10 - 0.50 GM SAMPLE LEACHED WITH 3 ML 2-2-2 "CL-HNO3-"20 A, 95 OEO. t FOR ONE HOUR, OlLUTEO TO 10 ML, ANALYSED BY ICP-ES. UPPER LIMITS - At. AU, Ht. V = 100 PPM: MO, CO, CO, SB, BI, TH, " & B = 2,000 PPM; CU. PB, ZN, NI, MN, AS, V, LA, CR = 10,000 PPM. ASSAY RECOMMENDED FOR ROCK AND CORE SAMPLES IF C" PB 2N AS > 1%. At > 30 PPM & A" > 1000 PPB - SAMPLE TYPE: ROCK RI50 60C AU** GROUP 38 - 30.00 GM SAMPLE ANALYSIS BY FA,ICP. Sawles besinnins 'RE' are Reruns and 'RRE' are Reiect Reruns.

DATE RECEIVED: ALE 1 2003 DATE REPORT MAILED: c SIGNRD BY. .'. 0. TOYE, C.LEONG, J. U.&NO; CERTIFlEO B.C. ASSAYERS

J

All results are considered the confidential property of the client. Acme assumes the Liabilities for actual cost of the analysis only.

Page 34: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

SAMPLE% C^ .^ U AU Th ST Cd Sb Si v ta P ta cr Hg sa Ti a Al Na K % x PpnPpn

u TI Hg Au** I, h PWPPPpn PEm Ppnppn Pp"Ppn Pm -- zppn xppm x % X PF~PP~ ppn ppb

CM215 <1 42 <3 103 g.3 23 21 1057 5.92 4 <a ‘2 2 170 <.5 <3 <3 201 .1.09 .240 15 53 13 1.57 83 .06 STANDARD DSS,A"-S 145 24 136 .3 ~3 25 12 788 2.99 2.62 .07 .09 Ia <2 <a ~2 3 50 5.6 <5 <, <z 6 3 59 .73 ,096 12 190 .b0 143 .09 17 2.13 .04 .15 4 <5 Cl 49

\

GRWP 10 - 0.50 GH SAHPLE LEACHED UiTH 3 Ml 2-2-2 HCL-HN03-HZ0 AT 95 DEG. C FOR ONE HWR, DltUTED TO 10 ML, ANALISED BY ICP-ES. UPPER LIMITS - AG. AU. HG. U = 100 PPM; MO. CO, CD, SB, 81, TH, " B a = 2,000 PPH; CU. ~a, ZN, NI, no, AS, v, LA, CR i ,o,ooo pp~. - SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL SSBO 60C AU** GRWP 38 - 30.00 GM SA"PLE ANALYSIS BY FAIICP.

” z L?

DATE RECEIVED: A”G 1 2003 DATE REPORT MAILED: SIGNED FJ .O. TOYE, C.LEONG, J. WANG: CERTIFIED B.C. ASSAYERS

2

Page 35: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

51 CM232 CM233 CM234 CM235

-zl 5 <3 6 c.3 2 -4 8 .06 <2 <a c2 <2 6 c.5 ~3 ~3 <I .23 s.001 4 3 .Ol 7 s.01 <3 .Ol .90 .Ol <2 4 4 <2 1 43 4 73 s.3 IS 16 809 4.35 <2 4 ~2 ~2 167 s.5 ~3 13 164 2.02 .152 10 39 1.50 49 .07 <3 2.81 .42 .06 <2 <5 4 2 1 7 4 97 q.3 2 7 388 2.50 3 <a ~2 ~2 47 x.5 ~3 ~3 48 .62 ,167 7 7 .41 221 .oa 3 .75 .14 .23 ~2 <5 *I ~2 1 32 <3 83 <.3 29 14 404 2.68 7 <a ~2 3 68 c.5 ~3 ~3 106 .60 .159 22 73 .24 a7 .21 3 .a5 .12 .I3 c2 <5 <l <2 1 22 4 35 s.3 12 6 126 1.55 19 <a ~2 2 59 x.5 ~3 <3 52 .42 .oa4 9 51 .13 123 .09 ~3 .70 .12 .I1 <2 <5 s, <2

CM236 1 23 *3 34 s.3 1‘ a 305 2.00 ~2 <a ~2 ~2 lla <.5 q3 <3 98 .a2 .I10 9 42 .20 139 .22 13 1.09 .2a .,4 <2 <5 e, 6 24 11 3 14 s.3 8 5 34 2.23 1lOa <a <2 4 71 s.5 s3 s3 58 .26

'I .I23 10 45 .15 117 .03 <3 .al .09

a .26 ~2 ~5 4 ~2

ia 7 s.3 1 Sl 21 .90 15 <a ~2 3 9 g.5 s3 <3 2 .01 .007 2 6 .Ol 156 <.Ol <3 .31 .Ol ~2 <5 <I 7 1

.24 3 la 5 s.3 1 <1 20 .aa 16 <a <2 3 9 q.5 <3 <3 2 .Ol .007 2 4 .Ol 159 s.01 <3 .29 s.01 .22 <2 <5 ~1 ~2

3 97 266 14 5.7 2 1 26 .73 48 <a t2 s 40 s.5 12 <3 2 .02 .009 29 9 .Ol 1260 s.01 3 .24 .Ol .19 ~2 ~5 <l IS7 2 zi CM240 <l 34 4 ai s.3 <1 14 1333 4.39 3 4 <2 <2 109 c.5 <3 <3 a0 1.92 ,128 7 1 1.59 133 .07 4 2.38 .I3 <1

STANDARD DSS/AU-R 12 145 .04 -z2 ‘5 <2

24 136 .3 25 12 786 2.99 19 <a *2 3 51 5.7 4 6 61 .74 .097 13 la9 .6S 144 .lO 17 2.14 .04 .,s s 4 4 481

e 4 GROUP 10 _ 0.50 GM SAWLE LEACHED WITH 3 ML 2-2-2 HCL-HN03-H20 AT 95 DEG. C FOR OWE "CM, DILUTED TO 10 "L, ANALYSED BY LCP-ES. UPPER LIMITS - AG, AU. HG, U = 100 PPM; MO. CO, CD, SS, SI, TH, " 6 S = 2,000 PPW; C", PS, ZN, N,, "N, AS, V, LA, CR I ,o,ooD PPM. ASSAY RECCMIENOED FOR ROCK AND CDRE SA"PLES IF C" PS 2N AS x 1X, ,,G > 30 PPW 6 A" > ,000 PPS - SAMPLE TYPE: ROCK R150 60C AU*' GRWP 38 - 30.00 tin SMPLE ANALYSIS 8" FA,ICP. Samles beginning IRE' we Reruns and 'RRE' are Reiect Reruns.

DATE RECEIVED: m

D. TOYE, C.LEONG, J. YANG; CERTIFIED B.C. ,WSAYERS

5

AUG272003 DATE REPORT MAI,,,+ y,&

2 0

!z 2 52

is 2

E

% . .

s

Y E--

2 El IA

d

VI'

ALL results we c$nsidered the confidential properry of the client. Acme 85smes the liabilities fw acttml COST of the analysis only. Da&A _

., i /

Page 36: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

aL&.vs, N..%Y~~.LLt%u IYID”nl%I”IIJ.fiD LITU. 00‘ pi. iiASTINw3 ST. “ANCOWER BC V6A lR6 (IS0 9002 Accredited Co.)

PHONE(604)253-3158 FAX(60 )253-1716

GEOCHEMICAL AN c

SIS CERTIFICATE 4 Kencayd., Nathen File # A303405

,2 . 4334 Hart Huy. Prince George SC VZK,227 Submitted by: Nathen Kenceyd

SAHPLEll No Cu Pb 2n AS Ni Co Mn Fe A* U AU Th Sr Cd Sb Si V Ca P La Cr MS Ba Ti S AL Na K w TI II9 Au** Ppn Pw PpnPW Ppn Ppn w Fw 'h Ppn Ppn Ppn Ppn PpnPpnPpmPpn Ppm % %PpnPpn 9: Ppn %Ppn % % % ppn PW ~;m ppb

Xl 1 <3 <I <.3 1 <1 13 .,l 2 -3 <2 *2 5 <.5 <3 <3 c, .21 c.00, 4 2 .Ol 6 c.01 *3 .02 .89 .D, <2 ‘5 4 12 101 13 26 13 .5 1 1 37 .59 92 ~8 ~2 4 11 c.5 IO <3 6 .O4 .019 7 12 .02 66 c.01 *3 .26 .Ol .17 ~2 ‘5 4 397 11 41 IO 1.3 3 2 30 .75 161 4 ~2 ~2 31 s.5 4 <3 10 .04 .025 2 11 .02 172 c.01 ~3 .26 .Ol .19 <2 c5 Cl 138 7 15 1.5 2 1 31 .55 186 4 ~2 2 5 c.5 <3 c3 3 .02 .004 6 9 .02 32 c.01 ~3 .20 c.01 .I7 <2 <5 <, 57 604 5 79 19 I., 6 4 59 .9l 174 4 ~2 <2 55 c.5 5 <3 5 .02 .007 5 12 .Ol 1452 c.01 ~3 .27 .Ol .I8 <2 ~5 <I

CM228 4 3 20 28 <.3 1 1 32 .78 16 4 ~2 3 IO <.5 c3 <3 8 .OP .033 20 8 .03 287 <.Ol ~3 .41 c.01 .29 ~2 ‘5 ~1 8 M229 2 44 ~3 80 <.3 56 29 2372 4.70 5 ~8 C2 C2 131 c.5 <3 ~3 140 1.00 .,70 18 92 .79 136 .05 <3 1.38 .I7 .08 <2 ~5 <I ~2 M230 1 31 ~3 65 x.3 41 15 458 3.99 2 <a <2 2 97 c.5 -c3 <3 99 .92 .141 15 60 .60 139 .05 <3 1.15 .I5 .08 c2 s5 <, 4 M231 1 39 <3 74 c.3 44 19 1016 3.96 5 <a ~2 2 167 .5 <3 <3 141 1.15 .I74 18 79 .62 99 .I2 <3 1.49 .25 .08 ~2 <5 <, 2 STANDARD OS5/AU-R 13 138 27 135 .3 25 12 749 3.04 18 <8 <2 3 50 5.7 4 5 60 .76 .089 11 187 .68 136 .lO 16 2.12 .04 .I5 5 c5 4 489

8 GROUP 10 - 0.50 GM SAMPLE LEACHED WITH 3 ML 2-2-2 HCL-HN03-HZ0 A, 95 DEG. C FOR ONE "OUR, O,L"TEO TO ,O ML, ANALYSE0 S', ,CP-ES. UPPER LIMITS - AG. AU. HG, U = 100 PPM; MO. CO, CO, SE, SI. TH, U 6 B = 2,000 PPM; CU. PB, ZN, N,, MN, AS, V, LA, CR = 10,000 PPM. ASSAY RECMlMENOEO FOR ROCK AND CORE SAMPLES IF C" PB 2N AS > 1%. At > 30 PPM & A" > ,000 PPS - SAMPLE TIPE: ROCK R150 60C AU** GROUP 38 - 30.00 GM SAMPLE ANALYSIS BY FA,,CP.

DATE RECEIVBD: AUG 14 2003 DATE REPORT MAILED: . TOYE, C.LEONG, J. WANG; CERTIFIED B.C. ASSAYERS

ALL results are considered the confidential property of the client. Acme assumes the liabilities for actual cost of the analysis only.

Page 37: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

- ROCK PULP

DATE RBCSIVBD: SEP 13 2003 ~

Page 38: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

GROUP IFi5 - 15.00 CH SAMPLE LEACHED WITH W WI. 2-2-Z HCL-HNOS-HZ0 A, 95 DEG. C FOR DHE HOUR, D,LO,ED TO 300 ML, A,,AL"$ED BV [Cp,Gs & "3. UPPER LINllS . AC NUI. NO, Y, SE, 1E. TL, GA, SW = 100 PPN; MO, CO, CD, SB. El, V", ", B = 2,000 9~4: RI, pn, 2~. ~1, w, AS, y, LA, CR = ,0,00O 99". . SAMPLE IVPE: ROCK PUCP

MT8 RBCBIVED: BE9 !3 2003 DATE REPORT ..D. VOVE. C.LEONC, J. UAHG; CERTIFIED B.C. ASSAYERS

All results are conridered the confidentfal property of the cticnt. Acme Awmo the Liabilities for actlse( cost ol the snelysis anly. lb Data- A _

Page 39: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property
Page 40: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

SRCW 1~0 0.50 G,, SAMPLE LEACHED !,,,H J "L 2-2-2 HCL-HNO3-HZ0 AT 95 DEC. C FOR ONE HWR, DILUTED 10 10 ML, ANALYSED BY ICP-MS. UPPER LlMlTS - AG, A", HG. u - 100 PPM; no, CO, CD, SS, 81, YH, " b S = 2,000 PPM; CU. PB, ZN, NI, MN, AS, V, LA, CR = 10,000 PPM. . SAMPLE TYPE: ROCK PULP

DATE RECEIVETlr SEP 13 2003 DATE REPORT MAI~ED:~~+$?%QNEXl EW$@'!+. D. TOYE, C.LEC+ki, J. UANC; CERTIFIED B.C. ASSAYERS

All results are considered the mnfidentieI property of the client. Acme ~ssunes the liebilitiea for actual cost of the analysis MtV.

Page 41: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

SAHPLE% co Cn Ga Hf Nb Ab Sn SP TB lh " " U 2r Y La Ce pr Nd Sm E" Cd lb Dy Ho Er Tm "b L" PpnPpnP~WFw PpnPpn ppnppnPwppnmFv ppnppnppnppnPpnppnppnppnPpnPwPwppnwmPpnFv

CMZJa .7 10.1 9.1 4.7 7.8 103.3 ~1 31.6 .6 12.4 5.1 0 1.0 146.2 19.4 16.0 36.0 4.03 13.0 2.9 .29 1.98 .3b 2.73 .53 1.87 .33 2.45 .34 STAWOARO so-17 10.1 3.8 19.0 12.4 26.4 23.1 11 313.2 4.3 11.8 ll.2 123 10.9 357.4 27.8 10.7 24.6 2.97 13.2 3.5 1.06 3.90 .69 4.35 .97 2.01 .44 2.92 .43 I

AIL rerultr me conSidered the confidential property of the client. Acme ~SSUWI the liabilities for actual cost of the analysis only. O.&A _

Page 42: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

SAMPLEt SiO; ALZO; Fe20; "9; CaO Na20 K20 TiO2 P205 "1-0 Cr203 Se Ni SC LO, TOT,C TOT,S sun x x x x x % ~Fwppnppn x x x x

CM238 83.55 8.18 1.88 .16 .05 .04 3.15 .19 .03 .Ol <.OOl 288 ~20 3 2.4 x.01 .26 99.67 STANDARD SO-17lCSB 61.26 13.76 5.81 2.33 4.63 4.21 1.41 .59 .98 .52 .442 424 40 23 3.4 2.40 5.28 99.40

GROUP 4A - 0.200 Cn SAMPLE BY LIE02 FUSION, ANALYSIS BY ICP-ES. LOI BY LOSS ON IGNITION.

2 T0TAL.C 6 S 81 LECO. (NOT INCLUDED IN THE SUM,

r;

zi

% DATE RECEIVEDi SEP 13 2003 D::::F':- ,~:,&&+@jbIGIW EX.pj . .O. TOYE, C.LEONG, J. WANG; CERTIFIED B.C. ASSAYERS ~

z

I AtI results are conridered the confldentiel property of the client. Acm aw.meS the liabilities for actual cost of the analysis only. & -

Page 43: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

w Appendix 4. Rock sample descriptions, Copley Lake property

UTM Zone 10 Sample E N Description

CM 99 CM 100

CM 103 claim CM 22 CM 104 claim CM 21

CM 107 claim CM 23 CM 108 claim CM 23 CM 109 claim CM 23 CM 110 claim CM 22 CM 111 claim CM 21 CM 112 claim CM 21 CM 113 claim CM 21 CM 114 Mandy Six CM 115 Mandy Six CM 116 Mandy Six CM 117 claim CM 21 CM 118 claim CM 21 CM119 claimCM23 CM 120 claim CM 23 CM 121 claim CM 22 CM 122 claim CM 21 CM 123 claim CM 21 CM 124 claim CM 21 CM 125 off claims? CM 126 off claims7 CM 127 &aim CM 23 CM 128 claim CM 23 CM 129 claim CM 23 CM 130 claim CM 23 CM 131 claim CM 23 CM 132 claim CM 23 CM 133 claim CM 23 CM134 CM 135 claim CM 21 CM 136 claim CM 21 CM 137 claim CM 23 CM 136 claim CM 23 CM 139 claim CM 23 CM 140 claim CM 23 CM 141 claim CM 23 CM 142 claim CM 23 CM 143 claim CM 23 CM 144 claim CM 23 CM 145 claim CM 23 CM 146 claim CM 23

CM 146a claim CM 23 CM 147 claim CM 23 CM 148 claim CM 23

same ok as M 242, M 243 same o/c as M 242, M 243

quartz, red stained, med. gn. quartz, as per CM 107 quartz, v hard, siliceous, fn gn, no min. breccia, grains of specularite rhyolite, red/yellow stain, crystals, tiny pyrite, hematite gn rhyolite, yellow/black stain, crystals, no min. breccia granodiorite, feldspar crystals, massive, md gn specularite granodiorite, as per CM 114, w green stain granodiorite, same as CM 115 rhyolite rhyolite rhyolite, crystals, green stain quartz, red stain, fine to md gn rhyoiite breccia, v fn gn pyrite, hematite rhyolite, yellow stain, cs crystals quartz quartz, minor fn gn pyrite? ? rock w red stain and veins of red Fe oxide basalt porphyry, fn gn hematite quartz, hard, red stain, fn 9” quartz, hard, fn gn quartz, fn gn, green stain, v fn gn specularite?, grey rock quartz, rusty, md gn, some fissures, yellow veins, min quartz, similar to CM 131 quartz, similar to CM 131 basalt, sm qtz vein, minor hem quartz, yellow stain rhyolite breccia, rusty, red, yellow, and black stains quartz, rusty, red stain, mdffn go, some fissures, tiny veins, yellow stain quartz as per CM 137 quartz as per CM 137 quartz as per CM 137 porphyry, green, qtz xtals, md gn porphyry, green, qtz xtals, md gn porphyry, green, qtz xtals, md gn rhyolite, crust like icing sugar quartz, red stain, cs gn quartz, red stain, cs gn felspar porphyry, md gn, 6-12mm xtals quartz, red stain, mdifn gn quartz, red stain, md/fn 9n

Page 44: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

CM 149 claim CM 23 CM 150 claim CM 23 CM 151 claim CM 22 CM 152 claim CM 22 CM 153 claim CM 22 CM 154 claim CM 22 CM 155 claim CM 23 CM 156 claim CM 23 CM 157 claim CM 23 CM 158 claim CM 23 CM 159 claim CM 23 CM 160 claim CM 22 CM 161 claim CM 22 CM 162 claim CM 23 CM 163 claim CM 21 CM 164 claim CM 21 CM 165 CM 166 CM 167

soft rack w red stain quartz, v minor py soft rock w red stain quartz, v minor py feldspar porphyry, mauve/purple, some qtz, minor hem porphyry w quartz veinlets, red stain red stain quarts vein in porphyry red stain quartz vein in porphyry quartz, fn gn, some fissures quartz 8s per CM 155, w green stain quartz, red stain porphyry, sheared rhyoiite, red stain; and porphyry, yellow stain jasper in porphyry rhyolite porphyry, red, qtz veinlets, some yellow, orange stain conglomerate, rusty, fissures, yellow stain, quartz jasper, red to maroon basalt porphyry, fn gn hematite basatt porphyry, crowded biotite xtals basaltldiabase basalt porphyry, black, some quartz

CM 169 376842 5955381 rhyolite porphyry, qtz vein, fissure, red and yellow stain CM 170 376899 5955030 rhyolite feldspar porphyry, re stain, qtz veinlets, some fn hem?,black stain CM171 n II rhyolite feldspar porphyry, re stain, qtx veinlets, some fn hem?,black stain CM 172 porphyry, pale green, pyrite, hematite, brown and black stains CM 173 378784 5954625 rhydite feldspar porphyry, qtz veins, red and yellow stains CM 174 claim CM 23 rhyolite feldspar porphyry, qtz veins, red and yellow stains CM 175 376899 5955033 rhyofta feldspar porphyry, red stain, qtz veinlets, fn gn hem, black stain CM 178 376899 5955033 rhyolite feldspar porphyry, red stain, qtz veinlets, fn gn hem, black stain CM 177 376899 5955033 rhyolite feldspar porphyry, red stain, qt.? veiniets, fn gn hem, black stain CM 178 376899 5955033 rhyolite feldspar porphyry, red stain, qtz veinlets, fn gn hem, black stain CM 179 376899 5955033 rhyolite feldspar porphyry, red stain, qtz veinlets, fn gn hem, black stain CM 180 granodiorite porphyry, biotite xtals CM 181 claim CM 23 basalt porphyry, crowded, red veintetsfissures CM 182 claim CM 23 basalt porphyry, crowded, red veinletsfissures CM 183 claim CM 23 basalt porphyry, crowded, red veinletsfissures CM 164 on Holy Cross Road CM165 SofRoad45 basalt, black

CM 186 off claims M 187 381572 5955748 rhyolite, hematite Ml88 381572 5955748 rhyolite, brecciated, specularite M 189 claim CM 25 breccia, quartz w orange, yellow, and black stain, hematite

CM 190 claim CM 23 rhyolite, purple w yellow and green stains M 191 claim Mandy Six rhyolite w minor specularite

CM 192 claim CM 23 M 192 claim Mandy Two quartz, re stain in rhyolite porphyry M 193 N of Mandy Six porphyry, black, ?, purple, and green, common hematite M 194 claim Mandy Six granodiorite porphyry, mauve/violet, some hem M 195 claim Mandy Two bracoiated rhyolite. minor pyrite M 196 claim Mandy Two brecoiated rhyolite, minor pyrite

CM 197 quartz, red stain, pale pink stain, minor py, hem M 197 claim Mandy Two conglomerate. rusty Ml98 SofCM25 quartz, greenish, ca gn, in basalt M 199 claim CM 21 brecciated rhyolite, blue-black stain, minor hem M200 378709.5 5957061 granodiorite porphyry, malachite stain

Y-z/3

Page 45: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property

M 201 b M 202

M 203 M 204 M 205 M206 M 207

CM 208 CM 209 M 210 M211

CM 212 M212

CM213 M213

CM214 M 214

CM 21.5 M215

CM216 M216

CM 217 M217

CM 218 M218

CM 219

w M 219 M 220

CM 221 M 221

CM 222 M 223 M 224 M225 M 226 M 227

CM 228 M 229 M 230 M 231

CM 232 M 232

CM 233 CM234 CM 235 CM 236 CM 237 CM 238 CM 239 CM 240

M 242 L M 243

claim CM 21 rhyolite breccia, mottled green and pink, minor specularite claim CM 21 rhyolite breccia, mottled green and pink, minor specularite claim CM 21 granodiorite porphyry, minor py, mal, copy on fractures claim CM 21 basalt, hematite, gray of fractures claim CM 21 basalt w hematite veins claim CM 21 basalt, pit/scar qtz phenocrysts, hem, blue stain claim CM 21 rhyolite, pyrite, hematitechalcopyrite. red and black stain

377827 5954642 rhyolite porphyry, minor hem, red and green stains 377827 5954642 rhyolite porphyry, minor hem, red and green stains 379616 5956954 porphyry, hematite 381832 5955509 quartz, 2 phases- gray chalcedonic and coarse vuggy. pyrite, hematite

claim CM 23 quartz, red stain in rholite porphyry, fissures claim Mandy Two porphyry, black stain, hematite

376901.5 5955206 as per CM 212 claim Mandy Two porphyry, qtz veins, minor hematite, black stains, some pin claim CM 23 as per CM 212 claim Mandy Two as per M 213 claim CM 23 claim Mandy Two as per M 213 claim CM 23 rhyolae porphyry, red stain, md gn qtz w fissures, yellow stain

claim CM 23 rhyolite porphyry, red stain, md gn qtz w fissures, yellow stain claim Mandy Two porphyry, yellow stain claim CM 25 quartz, green stain, corroded, cs gn claim Mandy Two quartz, red stain, cs gn, minor hematite claim CM 24 rhyolite, pink, crystals, fissures, red stain claim Mandy Two SofCM25 quartz, 2 types burrow pit as per M lgidyke?, med. grn.; some v fine grn. chalcopyrite, hematite claim Mandy Four quartz, 2 phases, v fn gn pyrite,, hematite, porous claim CM 23 rhyolite, pink/red, crystals claim Mandy Two dike?, simitiar to CM 221

381647.5 5955478 quartz, 2 types, fn gn chalcedonic and cs gn, porous; red/yellow stains 0 1, quartz, as per M 224 ,, 4, quartz, as per M 224

claim Mandy Two quarts, as per M 224 376837 5955211 hornfelsic rock, altered limestone?, hematite

burrow pit, km 7 basalt, blue-black stained burrow pit, km 7 basalt, quartz phenocrysts burrow pit, km 7 basalt, green stained, fractured claim CM 23

377957 5954279 mixed-up rock, greenish, crystals claim CM 23 basalt, float?

basalt porphyry, some hematite SofCM25 rhyolite, red, quartz crystals, hematite claim CM 25 basalt, dense, minor hematite claim CM 25 basalt, greenish yellow stained, corroded, quartz claim CM 22 rhyolite, red stained, quartz wystals

rhyolite, red stained, quarts crystals not on claims

claim Mandy Six claim Mandy Six

Y-313

Page 46: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property
Page 47: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property
Page 48: ‘CI’ Prospecting and Geochemical Report Copley Lake Property