Upload
maria-teesdale
View
222
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CHIPS approximation of proton-nuclear Coulomb scattering
Mikhail Kosov, 12th Geant4 Workshop (GB, Sept. 2007)
M.Kosov. CHIPS G4QElastic G4.9.0 2September 12-20, 2007
Typical features of Elastic scattering The final state for electromagnetic and
hadronic scattering is the same, so they interfere on the amplitude level.
Nobody can separate the EM and Hadronic scattering, but the measured “EM” part (probably a “EM/H interference” part) can be approximated as an independent discrete process (with a correction for leptons: e, m)
The low t electromagnetic part can be still simulated by a continuous process
M.Kosov. CHIPS G4QElastic G4.9.0 3September 12-20, 2007
CHIPS (w Coulomb)CHIPS (hadronic)SAID (G4Lpp)G4LElastic (LHEP)
M.Kosov. CHIPS G4QElastic G4.9.0 4September 12-20, 2007
Fit (w Coulomb)8.2 (simulation)G4HadronElastic(8.2p2)G4LElastic (8.2)
nucleargloria
M.Kosov. CHIPS G4QElastic G4.9.0 5September 12-20, 2007
Approximation of “Coulomb scattering”
t
e
dt
d tb
q
e
dq
d bq
2
-t = q2
Infinite differential cross-section has a finite integral
a) at high energy it is only a few mb
b) at low energy it can be barns
c) Below Coulomb threshold it is pure electromagnetic
M.Kosov. CHIPS G4QElastic G4.9.0 6September 12-20, 2007
Fit (w Coulomb)8.2 (simulation)G4HadronElastic(8.2p2)G4LElastic (no 3He)
S-wave at low energiesAdditional t-cut
Dominance of Coulomb
nucleargloria
M.Kosov. CHIPS G4QElastic G4.9.0 7September 12-20, 2007
Fit (w Coulomb)8.2 (simulation)G4HadronElastic(8.2p2)G4LElastic (8.2)
M.Kosov. CHIPS G4QElastic G4.9.0 8September 12-20, 2007
Fit (w Coulomb)8.2 (simulation)G4HadronElastic(8.2p2)G4LElastic (8.2)
QE
?
M.Kosov. CHIPS G4QElastic G4.9.0 9September 12-20, 2007
QEQE
Fit (w Coulomb)8.2 (simulation)G4HadronElastic(8.2p2)G4LElastic (8.2)
Increased QE
Stops at 900 (CM)Continues to 1800
M.Kosov. CHIPS G4QElastic G4.9.0 10September 12-20, 2007
QEQE
Fit (w Coulomb)8.2 (simulation)G4HadronElastic(8.2p2)G4LElastic (8.2)
M.Kosov. CHIPS G4QElastic G4.9.0 11September 12-20, 2007
Quasi-ElasticQE
Fit (w Coulomb)8.2 (simulation)G4HadronElastic(8.2p2)G4LElastic (8.2)
M.Kosov. CHIPS G4QElastic G4.9.0 12September 12-20, 2007
QE
Fit (w Coulomb)8.2 (simulation)G4HadronElastic(8.2p2)G4LElastic (8.2)
QE
M.Kosov. CHIPS G4QElastic G4.9.0 13September 12-20, 2007
CHIPS Glauber calculation
Lack of data
Only QEQE
QE
Fit (w Coulomb)8.2 (simulation)G4HadronElastic(8.2p2)G4LElastic (8.2)
M.Kosov. CHIPS G4QElastic G4.9.0 14September 12-20, 2007
The same fit can be done for pions
There is a fundamental difference between the pion and the muon elastic scatteringMuons do not have the hadronic scattering partMuons do not have the EM/H interference partMuons do not have screening in the interactions
Data for pion and for muon Multiple Scattering should be found and compared
The discrete and continuous processes must be consistent, otherwise the Stopping Ranges for hadrons can be spoiled
M.Kosov. CHIPS G4QElastic G4.9.0 15September 12-20, 2007
CHIPSG4QElasticCoherent Elastic
M.Kosov. CHIPS G4QElastic G4.9.0 16September 12-20, 2007
CHIPSG4QElastic
M.Kosov. CHIPS G4QElastic G4.9.0 17September 12-20, 2007
Conclusion
If the Electromagnetic group is ready for the consistent improvement of “Multiple Scattering”, CHIPS can provide a discrete process G4QEMElastic for pions & protons
At high energies the cross-section is order of magnitude smaller than the hadronic part
At low energy the EM cross-section is huge and the small stepping should be avoided