52

Larry BehrmannJames E. BrooksSimon FarrantAlfredo FayardAdl Venkitaraman

Rosharon

Andrew BrownCharlie MichelAlwyn NoordermeerBP Amoco

Sunbury on Thames

Phil SmithBP Amoco

David UnderdownChevron &

1932 19321958

1 9 4 8

Rosharon Jim Almaguer BobbyCarroll John Corben Janet Denney Brenden GroveBrad Hoffman Manish Kothari Jason Mai SamMusachia Bob Parrott Mark Vella Ian WaltoonWenbo Yang Andy Martin

B i g s h o t C I P RCleanSHOT Enerjet FIV GunStackHSD HyperJet IRIS

NODAL PERFPAC Pivot GunPowerFlow PowerJet QUANTUM S.A.F.E.

Secure SPANUltraJet UltraPack X-Tools

532000

70 80

80

TCP

TCP

1. Behrmann L Huber K McDonald B Couët B DeesJ Folse R Handren P Schmidt J Snider P

8 3 199618-33

2. Martin A Choosing The Right Gun71 10 1998 10 59-72

3.

4. Cosad C Choosing a Perforation Stragegy4 4 1992 10 54-69

>

54

5

25

40

50

70

1

RosharonSRC

4.4 70.6

1

30020G

30 2G

AOF

5. Klotz JA Krueger RF Pye DS Effect of PerforationDamage on Well Productivity Journal of PetroleumTechnology 26 1974 11 1303

6.1998 11 25 PowerJetAPI

54.1 137

7. Smith PS Behrmann LA Yang W Improvementsin Perforating Performance in High Compressive StrengthRocks SPE38141 SPE

1997 6 2-3

>

7.5 500

552000

1.15

1.0

0.85

0.7

0.55

0.44 8 12 16 20 24

Power Jet

Ultra Jet

Hyper Jet

PowerJet

20% 30%

PowerJet

62

API 1

API 1

75%PowerJet

25,000172

12.614 32 3616 40

15.9

4

>

16 33/8 HSDPowerJet HyperJet

UltraJet

>

API

PowerJet

PowerJet

56

127

21/8 PowerJet

300-780 48-124470-1550 75-246

PowerJet20 2.7

2000 13.82 70.6

2502700 18.6

PowerJet17.6 159

50 4509

PowerFlow

PowerFlow

AOF

1998 Conoco

AOF7 95/8

PowerFlowAOF

47%AOF 31%

PowerFlow

95/8

AOF 7

78%

>

PowerFlowUltraPack PowerFlow

X UltraPackPowerFlow

8. Brooks JE, Lands JF, Lendermon GM, Lopez de CardenasJE Parrott RA Perforating Gun Including anUnique High Shot Density Packing Arrangement

5 673 760 1997 10 7

1999 10 8 7 PowerFlow18

1.14 2.89 18.5391.6

9. Javora PH, Ali SA Miller M Controlled debrisPerforating Systems Prevention of an UnexpectedSource of Formation Damage SPE58758

SPELafayette 2000 2 23-24

10.Behrmann LA, Pucknell JK, Bishop SR Hsia T-YMeasurement of Additional Skin Resulting From

Perforation Damage SPE2280966 SPE

1991 10 6-9

572000

300psi

11.Pucknell JK Behrmann LA An Investigation of theDamaged Zone Created by Perforating SPE22811

SPE661991 10 6-9

12.Swift RP Behrmann LA Halleck P Krogh KEMicro-Mechanical Modeling of Perforating Shock

Damage SPE39458 SPELafayette

1998 2 18-19

13.Behrmann LA Li JL Venkitaraman A Li HBorehole Dynamics Dur ing Underbalanced

Perforating SPE38139 SPE1997 6 2-

3

14.Blosser WR An Assessment of PerforatingPerformance for High Compressive Strength Non-Homogeneous Sandstones SPE30082

SPE1995 5 15-16

15.Behrmann LA McDonald B Underbalance orExtreme Overbalance SPE31083SPELafayette 1996 2 14-15 SPEProduction & Facilities 1999 8 187-196

>

>

58

3000-psi EOB

EOB

60

70 80

Amoco 1985 9090

1989

Amoco

16. Behrmann 1

17.Bell WT Perforating Underbalanced-EvolvingTechniques Journal of Petroleum Technology 36

1984 10 1653-1652

18.King GE Anderson A Bigham M A Field Studyof Underbalance Pressures Necessary to Obtain CleanPerforations Using Tubing-Conveyed PerforatingSPE14321 60 SPE

Las Vegas1985 9 22-25

19.Crawford HR Underbalanced Perforating DesignSPE19749 64 SPE

S a nAntonio 1989 10 8-11

20.Tariq SM New Generalized Criteria for Determiningthe Level of Underbalance for Obtaining CleanPerforations SPE20636 65

SPE1990 9 23-26

21.Hsia T-Y Behrmann LA Perforating Skins as aFunction of Rock Permeability and UnderbalanceSPE22810 66 SPE

1991 10 6-9

22.Behrmann 10

Hsia Behrmann 21

Pucknell Behrmannn 11

Behrmann LA Pucknell JK Bishop SR Effects ofUnderbalance and Effective Stress on PerforationDamage in Weak Sandstone: Initial ResultsSPE24770 67 SPE

1992 10 4-7

Bartus iak R Behrmann LA Hal leck PM

Experimental Investigation of Surge Flow Velocity andVolume Needed to Obtain Perforation CleanupSPE26896 SPE

Pittsburgh 199311 2-4 Journal of Petroleum

Science and Engineering 17 1997 19-28

23.Behrmann 10

Mason JNm Dees JM Kessler N Block TestsModel the Near-Wellbore in a Perforated SandstoneSPE28554 69 SPE

1994 9 25-28

24.Behrmann LA Underbalance Criteria for MinimumPerforation Damage SPE300811995 SPE 1995

5 15-16 SPE Drilling & Completion1996 9 173-177

>

592000

10,000

1000

10010,0001000100101

Behrmann (1995)King (1985)

1000

1500

30

2 4

SRC

King

Behrmann

STC 2

7 1811.5

24

>>

60

6000

4500

3000

1500

0

-1500

-30000.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000

80

60

40

20

0

-20

-40

>

>

2000

spf 50%

612000

N=4

P

N=8 N= ∞

2P + D

D

0

20

40

60

80

100

1000100

, β0 = PN3/2d1/2α-5/8

1010.1

%

P = N = d = α =

1.5

10% 20%

15%

100%64

>

spf

>

PD

>

25.Behrmann 13

26.Brooks JE Simple Method for Estimating WellProductivity SPE 38148 SPE

1997 6 2-3

62

21 3

65 8

4

7

RosharonSRC

API PR435 1

PR 19BPR43

>

1-3 4

5-6 7-8

>

632000

28

16/30 U.S.

SRC API

API API1

API RP43

25000

34.5 API RP 1

240120

SRC

1. API

2. API PR 19R 1 RP 19BRP 19R

PR 43

3. Brooks JE Yang W Behrmann LA Effect of Sand-Grain Size onPerforator Performance SPE39457 SPE

Lafayette 1988 218-19

>

>

> API SRC

APIAPI 1

API RP43API SRC

64

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

1

00 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

2

3

25-50-

100-200-

>30°

(PFP)

EOBEOB

6

27.

PFP

28. 11

29.Behrmann 1

68

10

30 180

PFP 10 PFP

>

>

PFP30

652000

60°

30 180PFP 30

PFP 6030

PFP PFP 180

PFP 60 60180

PFPPFP

30 PFP

30180

PFP 10

PFP60 120

30PFP 180

WOPTTCP

PFP 60180

PFP 75

30.Behrmann LA Nolte KG Perforating Requirementsfor Fracture Stimulations SPE 39453

SPE Lafayette 1998 2 18-19

31.Brie A Endo T Hoyle D Codazzi D Esmersoy CHsu K Denoo S Mueller MC Plona T Shenoy R

Sinha B10 1 1998 40-55

32.Behrmann LA Elbel JL Effect of Perforations onFracture Initiation SPE 2066165 SPE

1990 9 23-26

33.Romero J Mack MG Elbel JL Theoretical Modeland Numerical Investigation of Near-Wellbore Effectsin Hydraulic fracturing SPE30506

70 SPE 1995 10 22-25

>

66

A

B

C

A

B

C

AOF AOF

>

>

SEM

672000

QUANTUM

QUANTUMX-

TCP

TCP

IRIS

IRIS

> PERFPAC TCPTCP

QUANTUMLCM

8 10

LCMLCM

LCM

PERFPAC

12 16 1821 60 45

34.Bruce S A Mechanical Stability Log SPE199421990 IADC/SPE1990 2 27 -3 2

Weingarten J Perkins T Prediction of SandProduction in Gas Well: Methods and Gulf of MexicoCast Studies SPE24797 67SPE

1992 10 4-7

van den Hoek PJ Hertogh GMM Kooijman AP deBree P Kenter CJ Papamichos E A New Conceptof Sand Production Prediction: Theory and LaboratoryExperiments SPE36418 71 SPE

1996 10 6-9

Kooijman AP van den Hoek PJ de Bree P KenterCJ Zhang Z Khodaverdian M HorizontalWellbore Stability and Sand Production in WeaklyConsolidated Sandstone SPE36419

71 SPE1996 10 6-9

Blok RHJ wel l ing RWF Behrmann LA

Venkitaraman A Experimental Investigation of theInfluence of Perforating on Gravel-Pack ImpairmentSPE36481 71 SPE

1996 106-9

35.Behramn L Willson SM de Bree P Presles CField Implications from Full-Scale sand Production

Experiments SPE38639 72 SPESan

Antonio 1997 10 5-8

Presles C Cruesot M A Sand Failure Test Can CutBoth Completion costs and the Number of DevelopmentWells SPE38186 SPE

1997 6 2-3

36.Venkitaraman A, Li H, Leonard AJ Bowden PRExperimental Investigation of Sanding Propensity for

Andrew Completion SPE50387SPE

1998 11 1-42

37.Mason 23

38.Behrmann Nolte 30

8 100 180

PFP 30

68

4000

3000

2000

1000

0 20001000 400030000

0° 300° 360°240°180°120°60°

L1

L2

L3

39.Venkitaraman A Behrmann LA Noordermeer AHPerforating Requirements for Sand Prevention

SPE58788 SPELafayette 2000

2 23-24

40.Sulbaran AL Carbonell RS Lopez-de-Cardenas JEOriented Perforating For Sand Prevention SPE57954

1999 SPE1997 5 31 6 1

41.Behrmann LA Apparatus and Method forDetermining an Optimum Phase Angle for PhasedCharges in a Perforating Gun to Maximize DistancesBetween Perforations in a Formation5 392 857 1995 2 28 >

L1 L2 L3

>

692000

60° 99°

N

BraePiperClaymore

BuchanBeatrice

Montrose

Britannia

Forties

Fulmar

Erskine

Lomond

X300

X200

X100

X000

1000 10,000 0 300

BC

10.510

98.5620.3

89289346

%

15.7713.54

1227 (20)259 (5)

822 (40)643 (10)

1739 (60)1181 (15)

3401 (80)1935 (20)

2468

10

4.914.384.033.68

4.994.403.713.12

0.7960.6460.5730.526

0.8970.7110.6190.527

100 B (98.56 mD)

5 spf, A 12 spf, X 5 spf, A 12 spf, X C (20.3 mD)

Magnus BP Amoco

660 199790

Magnus60 90

4.88 7.61 12.419.4 56%

BritanniaChevron Conoco

NODAL

Britannia

> BP Amoco Magnus

33/8 606 1997

99

> Britannia

> BritanniaB C B 5 15%C X 12 10%

70

Enerjet Enerjet111/16 3.79

1.56 HSD4

2.0 HSD 6

60˚

2.25 HSD6

60˚

5.85 Bigshot18

120˚/60˚

6 5/8 Bigshot18

120˚/60˚

BritanniaRosharon SRC

10006.9

12

Enerjet Pivot

TCP HSDHSD

>

712000

X-Tool

10 100 1000 1 10 100 1000

TCP84

X-Tool

WXARSXAR

MAXRSXPV

SXVA

PCP

GunStackCDAD

WXAR MAXR GunStackCDAD

CIPR

CIPR

CIRP

2-4.52000 610

60

FIV

FIVFIV

FIV

FIVFIV

FIV

BP Amoco Andrew

FIVLTIV

LTIV

LTIV

>

42.1999 6HSD BP Amoco

Wytch Farm M-16

8583 2616 25000 CleanSHOT

43.Patel D Kusaka Mason J Gomersall S TheDevelopment and Application of the Formation IsolationValve

Rravenna 1997 3 9-21

Kusaka K Patel D Gomersall S Mason J DoughtyP Underbalance Perforation in Long Horizontal Wellin the Andrew Field OCT85321997

1997 5 5-6

Mason J Gomersall D Andrew/Cyrus HorizontalWell Completions SPE38183 SPE

1997 6 2-3

72

SXAR

MAXR

WXAR

FIV

CIRP

CIRP

GunStack (CDAD)

1

3

2

4

1

3

3

3

3 44

1

1

2

4

( )

TCP PCP

TCP

TCP PCP

WPAT WPAT27/8

231/2 21/4 21/2

WPAT

WPAT

1

WPAT

40 12

65

TCP PCPTCP

44.Huber KB Pease JM Safe Perforating Unaffectedby Radio and Electric Power SPE20635

65 SPE1990 9 23-26

Huber Method and apparatus for Safe TransportHandling Arming and Firing of Perforating Guns Using aBubble Activated Detonator 5 088 413

1992 2 18

Lerche Firing System for a Perforating GunIncluding an Exploading Foil Initiator and an OuterHousing for Conducting Wireline Current and EFICurrent 5,347,929 1994 920

>

732000

12345

4 1/2-in. HSD UltraJet4 1/2-in. HSD PowerJet1 11/16-in. Enerjet2 1/8-in. Power Enerjet4 1/2-in. HSD UltraJet

, Kc/K

251

4

3

00 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

0.3

0.6

0.9

1.2

1.5

: 10: 4 in.

,

Kd/K: 0.5: 1 in.

SPAN 6.0© 1999

135°72°0°0°

72°

125465

EPDTCP

S.A.F.E.

S.A.F.E.EFI

S.A.F.E.

S.A.F.E.S.A.F.E.

Secure S.A.F.E.EFI

Secure S.A.F.E.

SPAN

API

SPAN

SPAN

SPAN

45.Carnegie A Application of Computer Models toOptimise Perforating Efficiency SPE38042

SPE1997 4 14-16

46.Behrmann Elbel 32

47.de Araujo PF Coelho de Souza Padiha TCIntegrating Geology and Perforating World Oil

218 2 1997 2 128-131

> SPAN

5

74

TCP PCP

MET

>