Upload
montana
View
55
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Charge and Bunch Length Scope. Compression Scenarios for the European XFEL. Igor Zagorodnov 1st Meeting of the European XFEL Accelerator Consortium DESY, MPY 14. April 2012. Inhalt. Analytical and Numerical A pproaches Compression Scenarios for Different C harges - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
-2 -1 0 1 2
13.995
14
14.005
Compression Scenarios for the European XFEL
Charge and Bunch Length Scope
Igor Zagorodnov
1st Meeting of the European XFEL Accelerator Consortium
DESY, MPY14. April 2012
[GeV]E
[μm]s
Igor Zagorodnov| 1st Meeting of EXFEL Accelerator Consortium | 17. April 2012 | Seite 2
Inhalt
Analytical and Numerical Approaches Compression Scenarios for Different Charges Strong Compression Summary
Igor Zagorodnov| 1st Meeting of EXFEL Accelerator Consortium | 17. April 2012 | Seite 3
Analytical and Numerical ApproachesLayout
1 130MeVE 1,1M
Gun
1,3M
2M 3M 4M
LH
DL 1BC 2BC 3BC2 700MeVE 3 2400MeVE 4 14 /17.5GeVE
Igor Zagorodnov| 1st Meeting of EXFEL Accelerator Consortium | 17. April 2012 | Seite 4
Analytical and Numerical Approaches
1
56,1
1
130MeV?
?
ER
C
2
56,2
2
700MeV?
?
ER
C
3
56,3
2400MeV?
ER
Working points (11 macro-parameters)
What is the optimal choice?
1,1M
Gun
1,3M
2M 3M 4M
LH
DL 1BC 2BC 3BC
, ,C C C
Zagorodnov I., Dohlus M., A Semi-Analytical Modelling of Multistage Bunch Compression with Collective Effects, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams, 2011.
Igor Zagorodnov| 1st Meeting of EXFEL Accelerator Consortium | 17. April 2012 | Seite 5
-100 -50 0 50 1000
1
2
3
4
-5 0 50
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
[mm]s
1( )C s
3 [μm]s
[kA]I
(0) 0C
Analytical and Numerical ApproachesChoosing of machine parameters
very strong compression at the bunch head (spike)
(0) 0C
Igor Zagorodnov| 1st Meeting of EXFEL Accelerator Consortium | 17. April 2012 | Seite 6
Analytical and Numerical Approaches
ACC39 ACC4/5/6/7ACC39 ACC4/5/6/7
~ 1.5 kA
~2.5 kA
slice emittance > 2mm
slice emittance ~ 0.3 - 1mm
Q=1 nC
Q=0.5 nC
Rollover Compression vs. Linearized (FLASH)
Igor Zagorodnov| 1st Meeting of EXFEL Accelerator Consortium | 17. April 2012 | Seite 7
Analytical and Numerical Approaches[MeV]E
[μm]s
[kA]I[μm]s
[μm]s[μm]s
[MeV]E
[kA]I
0C 0C
Q=1 nC
Igor Zagorodnov| 1st Meeting of EXFEL Accelerator Consortium | 17. April 2012 | Seite 8
Analytical and Numerical ApproachesAnalytical solution without self-fields
10 0 0( )x A f
Solution with self-fields
0( ) A x f
10 ( )n nx A g
nonlinear operator (tracking with self-fields)
1 1n n n g g f
10 0 0( ) ( ) x A A x f A x
10 0 1 0 1( ) ( )n n n
x A A x f A x
numerical tracking
analytical correction of RF parameters
1 1( )n n f A x
1 0 1n n f f fresidual inmacroscopic parameters
1,1
1,1
1,3
1,3
2
2
3
3
V
V
V
V
x
1
2
3
10
2
EEECCCCC
f
Zagorodnov I., Dohlus M., A Semi-Analytical Modelling of Multistage Bunch Compression with Collective Effects, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams, 2011.
Igor Zagorodnov| 1st Meeting of EXFEL Accelerator Consortium | 17. April 2012 | Seite 9
Analytical and Numerical Approaches
1 130MeVE
Beam dynamics simulation
1,1M
Gun
1,3M
2M 3M 4M
LH
DL 1BC 2BC 3BC2 700 MeVE 3 2400 MeVE 4 14GeVE
ASTRA ( tracking with 3D space charge, DESY, K. Flötmann)
W1 -TESLA cryomodule wake (TESLA Report 2003-19, DESY, 2003)W3 - ACC39 wake (TESLA Report 2004-01, DESY, 2004)TM - transverse matching to the design optics
W3
W1
TM4W1
TM64W1
12W1
TM
Full 3D simulation method (200 CPU, ~10 hours)
CSRtrack (tracking through dipoles, DESY, M. Dohlus, T. Limberg)
1.6 kmz
Igor Zagorodnov| 1st Meeting of EXFEL Accelerator Consortium | 17. April 2012 | Seite 10
Compression for Different Charges
-40 -20 0 20 40 600
1
2
3
4
5
Q=1 nCE
[kA]I
Phase space
[MeV]E
0.9 [μm]projx
3.5 [μm]projy
Current, emittance, energy spread
[μm]x[μm]y
[μm]s [μm]s
178fs
bunch head
-40 -20 0 20 40 60
13.998
14
14.002
14.004
14.006
14.008
Igor Zagorodnov| 1st Meeting of EXFEL Accelerator Consortium | 17. April 2012 | Seite 11
Compression for Different Charges
-20 -10 0 10 200
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1E Phase space
[MeV]E
0.45 [μm]projx
1.5[μm]projy
Current, emittance, energy spread
[μm]x
[μm]y
[μm]s [μm]s
39fs
bunch head
5kAI
-10 0 10 20
13.995
14
14.005
14.01
Q=250 pC
Igor Zagorodnov| 1st Meeting of EXFEL Accelerator Consortium | 17. April 2012 | Seite 12
Compression for Different Charges
-2 -1 0 1 20
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
[MeV]E
0.14 [μm]projx
0.26 [μm]projy
Current, emittance, energy spread
[μm]x[μm]y
[μm]s
2fs
5kAI
E
[μm]s
-2 -1 0 1 2
13.995
14
14.005
Phase spaceQ=20 pC
Igor Zagorodnov| 1st Meeting of EXFEL Accelerator Consortium | 17. April 2012 | Seite 13
Compression for Different Charges
Parameter UnitBunch charge nC 1 0.5 0.25 0.1 0.02
Peak current (gun) A 43 24 13.5 5.7 1.2Bunch length (gun, FWHM) ps 25 22 20 17 17
Slice emittance (gun) mm 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.21 0.09Projected emittance (gun) mm 1 0.7 0.6 0.3 0.1
Compression 114 233 363 877 3833
Peak current kA 4.9 5.6 4.9 5 4.6Bunch length (FWHM) fs 178 72 39 12 2.2
Slice emittance mm 1 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.17Projected emittance mm 3.5 2.2 1.5 0.84 0.26Slice energy spread (laser heater off)
MeV 0.45 0.44 0.6 0.6 0.8
Beam parameters from S2E simulations
Igor Zagorodnov| 1st Meeting of EXFEL Accelerator Consortium | 17. April 2012 | Seite 14
Compression for Different Charges
-30 -20 -10 0 10 200
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0 50 100 1500
0.5
1
1.5
2
Radiation Q=1nC. SASE[GW]P
[μm]s
[mJ]W
[m]z
Genesis
ALICE
Genesis
ALICE
Zagorodnov I., Dohlus M., Numerical FEL studies with a new code ALICE, in Proceedings of FEL09, Liverpool, 2009.
Igor Zagorodnov| 1st Meeting of EXFEL Accelerator Consortium | 17. April 2012 | Seite 15
Compression for Different Charges
0 50 100 1500
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 50 100 150
10-4
10-2
100
Radiation energy statistics (1-25-120 runs) mJE
[m]z
250 pC
1 nC
Mean energy
20 pC
fsz
Radiation pulse width (RMS)
Charge, nC 1 0.25 0.02Mean radiation energy, mJ 1-4 1-2 0.1-0.4Pulse radiation width (FWHM), fs 25-50 10-20 1-2
250 pC
1 nC
20 pC
[m]z
Igor Zagorodnov| 1st Meeting of EXFEL Accelerator Consortium | 17. April 2012 | Seite 16
Compression for Different Charges
Bunch charge, nC 1 0.25 0.02Wavelength, nm 0.1
Beam energy, GeV 14Peak current, kA ~ 5
Slice emmitance,mm-mrad 1 0.5 0.2Saturation length, m 85 60 45
Energy in the rad. pulse, mJ 1-4 1-2 0.1-0.4
Radiation pulse duration FWHM, fs 25-50 10-20 1-2Averaged peak power, GW 10-50 10-100 50-150
Spectrum width, % 0.15-0.3 0.18-0.5
Radiation Properties from S2E
Igor Zagorodnov| 1st Meeting of EXFEL Accelerator Consortium | 17. April 2012 | Seite 17
Strong Compression
-40 -20 0 20 40 600
1
2
34
5
67
8
910
Q=1 nC, I=10kAPhase space
[MeV]E
0.9 [μm]projx
8 [μm]projy
Current, emittance, energy spread
[μm]x
[μm]y
[μm]s [μm]s
85fs
[kA]I
-20 0 20 40
14.002
14.004
14.006
14.008
14.01
14.012
14.014E
Igor Zagorodnov| 1st Meeting of EXFEL Accelerator Consortium | 17. April 2012 | Seite 18
Strong Compression
Parameter UnitBunch charge nC 1
Peak current (gun) A 43Compression 116 228Peak current kA 5 9.8
Bunch length (FWHM) fs 178 75Slice emittance mm 1 1
Projected emittance mm 3.5 8Slice energy spread (laser heater off)
MeV 0.45 1
Q=1 nC
Igor Zagorodnov| 1st Meeting of EXFEL Accelerator Consortium | 17. April 2012 | Seite 19
Strong Compression for 250 pC
[MeV]E
[kA]I
[μm]s
[μm]s [μm]s
[μm]s
[MeV]E
[kA]I
R56,3= -20 mm R56,3= -23.8 mm
Igor Zagorodnov| 1st Meeting of EXFEL Accelerator Consortium | 17. April 2012 | Seite 20
Strong Compression for 250 pC
Momentum compaction
factor in BC1
R56,1,[mm]
Compr.in BC1
C1
Momentum compaction
factor in BC2
R56,2,[mm]
Compr.in BC2
C2
Momentum compaction
factor in BC3
R56,3,[mm]
Totalcompr.
C
Second derivative
(C-1)'',[m-2]
-78 3.5 -50 8 -20,…,-24 385 1000
Macro-parameters
1 130MeVE 2 700 MeVE 3 2400MeVE
Igor Zagorodnov| 1st Meeting of EXFEL Accelerator Consortium | 17. April 2012 | Seite 21
Strong Compression for 250 pC
-10 0 10 20
13.995
14
14.005
14.01
-20 -10 0 10 20 300
0.5
1
1.5
R56,3=-20mm
5kAI
Phase space
[MeV]E
Current, emittance, energy spread
[μm]x
[μm]y
[μm]s [μm]s
Igor Zagorodnov| 1st Meeting of EXFEL Accelerator Consortium | 17. April 2012 | Seite 22
Strong Compression for 250 pC
-20 -10 0 10 20 300
1
2
3
-10 0 10 20
13.935
13.94
13.945
13.95
13.955
R56,3 =-21 mm
5kAI
Phase space
[MeV]E
Current, emittance, energy spread
[μm]x
[μm]y
[μm]s [μm]s
Igor Zagorodnov| 1st Meeting of EXFEL Accelerator Consortium | 17. April 2012 | Seite 23
Strong Compression for 250 pC
-10 0 10 200
2
4
6
8
10
[MeV]E-5 0 5 10 15
13.9
13.92
13.94
13.96
13.98
5kAI
[MeV]E
[μm]x
[μm]y
[μm]s [μm]s
R56,3 =-21.9 mmPhase space Current, emittance, energy spread
Igor Zagorodnov| 1st Meeting of EXFEL Accelerator Consortium | 17. April 2012 | Seite 24
Strong Compression for 250 pC
-5 0 5 10 150
2
4
6
8
0 5 10
13.92
13.93
13.94
13.95
13.96
13.97
5kAI
[MeV]E
[μm]x
[μm]y
[μm]s [μm]s
R56,3 =-22.6 mmPhase space Current, emittance, energy spread
Igor Zagorodnov| 1st Meeting of EXFEL Accelerator Consortium | 17. April 2012 | Seite 25
Strong Compression for 250 pC
-4 -2 0 2 40
1
2
3
4
5
-2 -1 0 1 2
13.92
13.93
13.94
13.95
13.96
13.97
5kAI
[MeV]E
[μm]x
[μm]y
[μm]s [μm]s
R56,3 =-22.6 mm (70% of particles)Phase space Current, emittance, energy spread
Igor Zagorodnov| 1st Meeting of EXFEL Accelerator Consortium | 17. April 2012 | Seite 26
Strong Compression for 250 pC
-10 -5 0 5 100
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
-4 -2 0 2 413.98
13.99
14
14.01
14.02
5kAI
[MeV]E
[μm]x
[μm]y
[μm]s [μm]s
R56,3 =-23.2 mm (70% of particles)Phase space Current, emittance, energy spread
Igor Zagorodnov| 1st Meeting of EXFEL Accelerator Consortium | 17. April 2012 | Seite 27
Strong Compression for 250 pCBeam core parameters vs. R56
20 21 22 23 240
10
20
30
40
50
20 21 22 23 240
5
10
15
20
25
20 21 22 23 240.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
20 21 22 23 240
1
2
3
4
[kA]I
[μm]slicex [μm]slice
y
[fs]t
56,3 [mm]R56,3 [mm]R
56,3 [mm]R56,3 [mm]R
70% of particles
Igor Zagorodnov| 1st Meeting of EXFEL Accelerator Consortium | 17. April 2012 | Seite 28
Strong Compression for 250 pC
20 21 22 23 240
2
4
6
8
20 21 22 23 24
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
0.55
0.6
0.65
20 21 22 23 240
2
4
6
8
20 21 22 23 240
10
20
30
40
50
[kA]I [MeV]E
[μm]y[μm]x
56,3 [mm]R
56,3 [mm]R
56,3 [mm]R
56,3 [mm]R
70% of particles
Beam core parameters vs. R56
Igor Zagorodnov| 1st Meeting of EXFEL Accelerator Consortium | 17. April 2012 | Seite 29
Strong Compression for 250 pC
0 50 100 1500
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3[mJ]E
[m]z
56.3 20mmR
56.3 21.6mmR
Radiation energy vs. R56 (with und. wake and taper)
20 21 22 23 240
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
60mz
[mJ]E
[a.u.]I
56,3 [mm]R
Igor Zagorodnov| 1st Meeting of EXFEL Accelerator Consortium | 17. April 2012 | Seite 30
Strong Compression (SLAC)
0.15 50.03
Q=20 pC
Igor Zagorodnov| 1st Meeting of EXFEL Accelerator Consortium | 17. April 2012 | Seite 31
Strong Compression for 250 pC
Radiation energy vs. compression rate
20 21 22 23 240
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
60mz
[mJ]E
[a.u.]I
56,3 [mm]R
Igor Zagorodnov| 1st Meeting of EXFEL Accelerator Consortium | 17. April 2012 | Seite 32
Strong Compression for 250 pC
20 21 22 23 240
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
60mz
[mJ]E
[a.u.]I
56,3 [mm]R
0.15 50.03
1 6
0.16
Radiation energy vs. compression rate
Igor Zagorodnov| 1st Meeting of EXFEL Accelerator Consortium | 17. April 2012 | Seite 33
Strong Compression for 250 pC
20 21 22 23 240
100
200
300
400
500
600
700175mz
[a.u.]I
56,3 [mm]R20 21 22 23 24
0
50
100
150
20060mz
max[GW]P
[a.u.]I
max[GW]P
56,3 [mm]R
Radiation power vs. compression rate
Igor Zagorodnov| 1st Meeting of EXFEL Accelerator Consortium | 17. April 2012 | Seite 34
Summary
Bunches with charge 20-1000 pC can be compressed to 5 kA and higher
Radiation energy drops down at “full” compression
Overcompression scenario can be used
Acknowledgements to M.Dohlus and T.Limberg for many useful discussions