1
Characterizing the Male Urogenital Tract Microbiome using 16S rRNA Gene Analysis Kirsty Lee Garson 1 , Enock Havyarimana 2 , Katie Lennard 2 , Clive Gray 2 , Heather Jaspan 2,3 , Nicola Mulder 1 1 Division of Computational Biology, Department of Integrative Biomedical Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa 2 Division of Immunology, Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town, South Africa 3 Seattle Children’s Research Institute, University of Washington, USA The male urogenital tract is the site of interactions between the microbiome, the immune system and various sexually-transmitted pathogens. A better understanding of these interactions may enable the development of interventions which decrease susceptibility to sexually transmitted infections (STIs), such as HIV. A number of randomized, controlled trials have found that medical male circumcision reduces susceptibility to HIV. To address these questions, young males scheduled to undergo circumcision were recruited into a longitudinal study. Penile swabs were collected at various time points pre- and post-circumcision for microbiome analysis. Figure 1: Principle coordinates analysis (PCoA) of samples by circumcision status. Each sample is represented by a single point, with the distances between points indicating their degree of similarity. A Permutation Multivariate Analysis Of Variance (PerMANOVA) confirmed that the composition of the two sets of samples were distinct (p = 0.001). Exploratory data analysis and statistical testing phyloseq, vegan, ape, etc. Assigning taxonomy and creating a phylogenetic tree QIIME, RDP classifier Grouping of reads into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) De novo OTU clustering using UPARSE How does circumcision influence the composition of the male urogenital tract microbiome? What effect does circumcision have on the specific taxa (genera/species) which have been associated with increased/decreased HIV susceptibility? Quality control of reads FastQC, UPARSE The analysis was funded by the SA National Research Foundation . It forms part of a study to investigate factors affecting HIV susceptibility in the genital tracts of young men, funded by the European & Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership . The analysis was carried out using the UCT High Performance Computing facility and the CBIO 16S Gene Analysis Pipeline . A travel fellowship was provided by the African Partnership for Chronic Disease Research. Sequencing of a marker gene V4 region, Illumina MiSeq The analysis of samples taken before and after circumcision revealed distinct bacterial community composition (Figure 1). Several taxa that have been linked to increased HIV susceptibility 1 , were decreased post-circumcision (Figure 2, Figure 3). In contrast, Lactobacillus species, which are considered to be protective in the female genital tract 2 , were increased substantially after circumcision (Figure 4). These findings have implications for the development of potential methods to reduce HIV susceptibility by modulating the (uro)genital tract microbiome. 1 Liu CM et al. Penile anaerobic dysbiosis as a risk factor for HIV infection . mBio 8:4, 2017. 2 Petrova MI et al. Lactobacillus species as biomarkers and agents that can promote aspects of vaginal health . Front. Physiol. 6:81, 2015. Figure 3: A comparison of the average composition of samples collected pre- and post-circumcision (* p<0.05, ** p<0.01). Figure 2: Average-linkage hierarchal clustering revealed patterns in the relative abundance of specific genera before and after circumcision (* p<0.05, ** p<0.01). Taxa highlighted in blue have been linked to increased HIV susceptibility 1 . Figure 4: No. of reads assigned to the Lactobacillus genus, which has been linked to decreased HIV susceptibility. (** p<0.01). After Circumcision Before Circumcision Mobiluncus ** Corynebacterium ** Porphyromonas * Prevotella * Staphylococcus * Facklamia * Lactobacillus ** Anaerococcus ** Finegoldia * Peptoniphilus ** WAL * Escherichia ** Samples Genus No. of reads Lactobacillus iners ** Lactobacillus reuteri Unassigned Lactobacillus species ** Pre-Circumcision Samples Post-Circumcision Samples Species Key: Genus 1-68 * Anaerococcus ** Campylobacter * Clostridium * Corynebacterium Dialister * Finegoldia * Mobiluncus * Peptococcus Peptoniphilus ** ph2 * Porphyromonas * Prevotella * Staphylococcus * WAL * Before Circumcision After Circumcision OTU_001 OTU_002 OTU_003 GATACAGAGATGCATGATACAGAGATGCAT GTATACAGAGATGCATGATACAGAGATGCAT GGATACAGAGATGCATGATACAGAGATGCAT GATCACAGAGATGCATGATACAGAGATGCAT ATAGATACAGAGATCATGATACAGAGATGCAT ATAGTATACAGAGACATGATACAGAGATGCAT TATGATACAGAGACATGATACAGAGATGCAT TATGTATACAGAACATGATACAGAGATGCAT TAGGGATACAGACATGATACAGAGATGCAT PCoA.1(21.3%) Before circumcision After circumcision PCoA.2(8.7%)

Characterizing the Male Urogenital Tract Microbiome using ...web.cbio.uct.ac.za/~gerrit/slides/kirsty/Poster.pdf · The male urogenital tract is the site of interactions between the

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Characterizing the Male Urogenital Tract Microbiome using ...web.cbio.uct.ac.za/~gerrit/slides/kirsty/Poster.pdf · The male urogenital tract is the site of interactions between the

Characterizing the Male Urogenital Tract

Microbiome using 16S rRNA Gene Analysis

Kirsty Lee Garson 1, Enock Havyarimana2, Katie Lennard2, Clive Gray2, Heather Jaspan2,3, Nicola Mulder 1

1Division of Computational Biology, Department of Integrative Biomedical Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa2Division of Immunology, Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town, South Africa

3Seattle Children’s Research Institute, University of Washington, USA

The male urogenital tract is the site of interactions between the

microbiome, the immune system and various sexually-transmitted

pathogens. A better understanding of these interactions may enable the

development of interventions which decrease susceptibi l ity to sexually

transmitted infections (STIs), such as HIV.

A number of randomized, controlled trials have found that medical male

circumcision reduces susceptibi l i ty to HIV.

To address these questions, young males scheduled to undergo

circumcision were recruited into a longitudinal study. Penile swabs were

collected at various time points pre- and post-circumcision for microbiome

analysis .

Figure 1: Principle

coordinates analysis (PCoA)

of samples by circumcision

status. Each sample is

represented by a single

point, with the distances

between points indicating

their degree of similarity.

A Permutation Multivariate

Analysis Of Variance

(PerMANOVA) confirmed

that the composition of the

two sets of samples were

distinct (p = 0.001).

Explorat ory dat a an alys is an d

s t a t i s t i ca l t e s t in g

phyloseq , vegan, ape, etc.

Ass ign in g t axon omy an d

c re at in g a phyloge n e t ic t re e

QIIME, RDP classif ier

Groupin g o f re ads in t o

ope rat ion al t axon omic un i t s ( OTUs)

De novo OTU clustering

using UPARSE

• How does circumcision influence the composition of the male

urogenital tract microbiome?

• What effect does circumcision have on the specific taxa

(genera/species) which have been associated with

increased/decreased HIV susceptibility?

Qual i t y con t ro l o f re ads

FastQC, UPARSE

• The analysis was funded by the SA National Research Foundation .

• It forms part of a study to investigate factors affecting HIV

susceptibi l i ty in the genital tracts of young men, funded by the

European & Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership .

• The analysis was carried out using the UCT High Performance

Computing facility and the CBIO 16S Gene Analysis Pipeline .

• A travel fel lowship was provided by the African Partnership for

Chronic Disease Research.

S e que n c in g o f a marke r ge n e

V4 region, I l lumina MiSeq

The analysis of samples taken before and after circumcision revealed

distinct bacterial community composition (Figure 1). Several taxa that

have been linked to increased HIV susceptibi l ity 1, were decreased

post-circumcision (Figure 2, Figure 3).

In contrast, Lactobacil lus species, which are considered to be

protective in the female genital tract 2, were increased substantial ly after

circumcision (Figure 4). These findings have implications for the

development of potential methods to reduce HIV susceptibi l ity by

modulating the (uro)genital tract microbiome.

1Liu CM et al . Penile anaerobic dysbiosis as a risk factor for HIV

infection. mBio 8:4, 2017.

2Petrova MI et al . Lactobacil lus species as biomarkers and agents that

can promote aspects of vaginal health . Front. Physiol . 6:81, 2015.

Figure 3: A comparison of the

average composition of samples

collected pre - and post -circumcision

(* p<0.05, ** p<0.01).

Figure 2: Average -l inkage hierarchal clustering revealed patterns in the

relative abundance of specif ic genera before and after circumcision

(* p<0.05, ** p<0.01). Taxa highlighted in blue have been l inked to

increased HIV susceptibil ity 1.

Figure 4: No. of reads assigned to

the Lactobacil lus genus, which has

been l inked to decreased HIV

susceptibil ity. (** p<0.01).

Af

te

r C

ir

cu

mc

is

io

nB

ef

or

e C

ir

cu

mc

is

io

n

Mobiluncus **

Corynebacterium **

Porphyromonas *

Prevotella *

Staphylococcus *

Facklamia *

Lactobacillus **

Anaerococcus **

Finegoldia *

Peptoniphilus **

WAL *

Escherichia **

S a m p l e s

Ge

nu

s

No

. o

f r

ea

ds

Lactobacillus iners **

Lactobacillus reuteri

Unassigned

Lactobacillus species

**

Pre-Circumcision

Samples

Post-Circumcision

Samples

Species

K e y :

Genus

1-68 *

Anaerococcus **

Campylobacter *

Clostridium *

Corynebacterium

Dialister *

Finegoldia *

Mobiluncus *

Peptococcus

Peptoniphilus **

ph2 *

Porphyromonas *

Prevotella *

Staphylococcus *

WAL *

Be

for

e

Cir

cu

mc

isio

n

Aft

er

Cir

cu

mc

isio

n

OTU_001

OTU_002

OTU_003

GATACAGAGATGCATGATACAGAGATGCATGTATACAGAGATGCATGATACAGAGATGCATGGATACAGAGATGCATGATACAGAGATGCATGATCACAGAGATGCATGATACAGAGATGCAT

ATAGATACAGAGATCATGATACAGAGATGCATATAGTATACAGAGACATGATACAGAGATGCAT

TATGATACAGAGACATGATACAGAGATGCATTATGTATACAGAACATGATACAGAGATGCATTAGGGATACAGACATGATACAGAGATGCAT

P C o A . 1 ( 2 1 . 3 % )

B e f o r e c i r c u m c i s i o n

A f t e r c i r c u m c i s i o n

PC

oA

.2(

8.7

%)