Upload
others
View
6
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Characterizations and classifications ofquasitrivial semigroups
Jimmy Devillet
University of LuxembourgLuxembourg
in collaboraton with Jean-Luc Marichal and Bruno Teheux
Part I: Single-plateauedness and 2-quasilinearity
Weak orderings
Recall that a weak ordering (or total preordering) on a set X is a binaryrelation - on X that is total and transitive.
Defining a weak ordering on X amounts to defining an ordered partitionof X
For X = {a1, a2, a3}, we have 13 weak orderings
a1 ≺ a2 ≺ a3 a1 ∼ a2 ≺ a3 a1 ∼ a2 ∼ a3
a1 ≺ a3 ≺ a2 a1 ≺ a2 ∼ a3
a2 ≺ a1 ≺ a3 a2 ≺ a1 ∼ a3
a2 ≺ a3 ≺ a1 a3 ≺ a1 ∼ a2
a3 ≺ a1 ≺ a2 a1 ∼ a3 ≺ a2
a3 ≺ a2 ≺ a1 a2 ∼ a3 ≺ a1
Weak orderings
Recall that a weak ordering (or total preordering) on a set X is a binaryrelation - on X that is total and transitive.
Defining a weak ordering on X amounts to defining an ordered partitionof X
For X = {a1, a2, a3}, we have 13 weak orderings
a1 ≺ a2 ≺ a3 a1 ∼ a2 ≺ a3 a1 ∼ a2 ∼ a3
a1 ≺ a3 ≺ a2 a1 ≺ a2 ∼ a3
a2 ≺ a1 ≺ a3 a2 ≺ a1 ∼ a3
a2 ≺ a3 ≺ a1 a3 ≺ a1 ∼ a2
a3 ≺ a1 ≺ a2 a1 ∼ a3 ≺ a2
a3 ≺ a2 ≺ a1 a2 ∼ a3 ≺ a1
Weak orderings
Recall that a weak ordering (or total preordering) on a set X is a binaryrelation - on X that is total and transitive.
Defining a weak ordering on X amounts to defining an ordered partitionof X
For X = {a1, a2, a3}, we have 13 weak orderings
a1 ≺ a2 ≺ a3 a1 ∼ a2 ≺ a3 a1 ∼ a2 ∼ a3
a1 ≺ a3 ≺ a2 a1 ≺ a2 ∼ a3
a2 ≺ a1 ≺ a3 a2 ≺ a1 ∼ a3
a2 ≺ a3 ≺ a1 a3 ≺ a1 ∼ a2
a3 ≺ a1 ≺ a2 a1 ∼ a3 ≺ a2
a3 ≺ a2 ≺ a1 a2 ∼ a3 ≺ a1
Single-plateaued weak orderings
Definition. (Black, 1948)Let ≤ be a total ordering on X and let - be a weak ordering on X .Then - is said to be single-plateaued for ≤ if
ai < aj < ak =⇒ aj ≺ ai or aj ≺ ak or ai ∼ aj ∼ ak
Examples. On X = {a1 < a2 < a3 < a4 < a5 < a6}
a3 ∼ a4 ≺ a2 ≺ a1 ∼ a5 ≺ a6 a3 ∼ a4 ≺ a2 ∼ a1 ≺ a5 ≺ a6
-
6
a1 a2 a3 a4 a5 a6
a6
a1 ∼ a5
a2
a3 ∼ a4
���� A
AA@@
r rr rr r
-
6
a1 a2 a3 a4 a5 a6
a6
a5
a1 ∼ a2
a3 ∼ a4
�� AAA@@
r r r r r r
Single-plateaued weak orderings
Definition. (Black, 1948)Let ≤ be a total ordering on X and let - be a weak ordering on X .Then - is said to be single-plateaued for ≤ if
ai < aj < ak =⇒ aj ≺ ai or aj ≺ ak or ai ∼ aj ∼ ak
Examples. On X = {a1 < a2 < a3 < a4 < a5 < a6}
a3 ∼ a4 ≺ a2 ≺ a1 ∼ a5 ≺ a6 a3 ∼ a4 ≺ a2 ∼ a1 ≺ a5 ≺ a6
-
6
a1 a2 a3 a4 a5 a6
a6
a1 ∼ a5
a2
a3 ∼ a4
���� A
AA@@
r rr rr r
-
6
a1 a2 a3 a4 a5 a6
a6
a5
a1 ∼ a2
a3 ∼ a4
�� AAA@@
r r r r r r
Single-plateaued weak orderings
Q: Given - is it possible to find ≤ for which - is single-plateaued?
Example: On X = {a1, a2, a3, a4} consider - and -′ defined by
a1∼a2≺a3∼a4 and a1≺′a2∼′a3∼′a4
Yes! Consider ≤ defined by a3 < a1 < a2 < a4
-
6
a3 a1 a2 a4
a3 ∼ a4
a1 ∼ a2
J
JJrr rr
No!
Single-plateaued weak orderings
Q: Given - is it possible to find ≤ for which - is single-plateaued?
Example: On X = {a1, a2, a3, a4} consider - and -′ defined by
a1∼a2≺a3∼a4 and a1≺′a2∼′a3∼′a4
Yes! Consider ≤ defined by a3 < a1 < a2 < a4
-
6
a3 a1 a2 a4
a3 ∼ a4
a1 ∼ a2
J
JJrr rr
No!
Single-plateaued weak orderings
Q: Given - is it possible to find ≤ for which - is single-plateaued?
Example: On X = {a1, a2, a3, a4} consider - and -′ defined by
a1∼a2≺a3∼a4 and a1≺′a2∼′a3∼′a4
Yes! Consider ≤ defined by a3 < a1 < a2 < a4
-
6
a3 a1 a2 a4
a3 ∼ a4
a1 ∼ a2
J
JJrr rr
No!
Single-plateaued weak orderings
Q: Given - is it possible to find ≤ for which - is single-plateaued?
Example: On X = {a1, a2, a3, a4} consider - and -′ defined by
a1∼a2≺a3∼a4 and a1≺′a2∼′a3∼′a4
Yes! Consider ≤ defined by a3 < a1 < a2 < a4
-
6
a3 a1 a2 a4
a3 ∼ a4
a1 ∼ a2
J
JJrr rr
No!
Single-plateaued weak orderings
Q: Given - is it possible to find ≤ for which - is single-plateaued?
Example: On X = {a1, a2, a3, a4} consider - and -′ defined by
a1∼a2≺a3∼a4 and a1≺′a2∼′a3∼′a4
Yes! Consider ≤ defined by a3 < a1 < a2 < a4
-
6
a3 a1 a2 a4
a3 ∼ a4
a1 ∼ a2
J
JJrr rr
No!
2-quasilinear weak orderings
Definition.We say that - is 2-quasilinear if
a ≺ b ∼ c ∼ d =⇒ a, b, c , d are not pairwise distinct
Proposition
Assume the axiom of choice.
- is 2-quasilinear ⇐⇒ ∃ ≤ for which - is single-plateaued
2-quasilinear weak orderings
Definition.We say that - is 2-quasilinear if
a ≺ b ∼ c ∼ d =⇒ a, b, c , d are not pairwise distinct
Proposition
Assume the axiom of choice.
- is 2-quasilinear ⇐⇒ ∃ ≤ for which - is single-plateaued
Part II: Quasitrivial semigroups
Quasitriviality
Definition
F : X 2 → X is said to be quasitrivial (or conservative) if
F (x , y) ∈ {x , y} x , y ∈ X
Example. F = max≤ on X = {1, 2, 3} endowed with the usual ≤
r r rr r rr r r
-
6
1 2 3
1
2
3
1
2
3
Quasitriviality
Definition
F : X 2 → X is said to be quasitrivial (or conservative) if
F (x , y) ∈ {x , y} x , y ∈ X
Example. F = max≤ on X = {1, 2, 3} endowed with the usual ≤
r r rr r rr r r
-
6
1 2 3
1
2
3
1
2
3
Quasitriviality
Definition
F : X 2 → X is said to be quasitrivial (or conservative) if
F (x , y) ∈ {x , y} x , y ∈ X
Example. F = max≤ on X = {1, 2, 3} endowed with the usual ≤
r r rr r rr r r
-
6
1 2 3
1
2
3
1
2
3
Projections
Definition.
The projection operations π1 : X 2 → X and π2 : X 2 → X are respectivelydefined by
π1(x , y) = x , x , y ∈ X
π2(x , y) = y , x , y ∈ X
Quasitrivial semigroups
Theorem (Langer, 1980)
F is associative and quasitrivial
m
∃ - : F |A×B =
{max- |A×B , if A 6= B,
π1|A×B or π2|A×B , if A = B,∀A,B ∈ X/ ∼
-
6
π1 orπ2
π1 orπ2
max-
max-
Quasitrivial semigroups
Theorem (Langer, 1980)
F is associative and quasitrivial
m
∃ - : F |A×B =
{max- |A×B , if A 6= B,
π1|A×B or π2|A×B , if A = B,∀A,B ∈ X/ ∼
-
6
π1 orπ2
π1 orπ2
max-
max-
Quasitrivial semigroups
-
6
1 2 3 4
1
2
3
4
< < <
s s s ss s s ss s s ss s s s����
1
2
3
4
-
6
2 4 3 1
2
4
3
1
∼ ≺ ≺
s s s ss s s ss s s ss s s s2
4
3
1
Order-preservable operations
Definition.
F : X 2 → X is said to be ≤-preserving for some total ordering ≤ on X iffor any x , y , x ′, y ′ ∈ X such that x ≤ x ′ and y ≤ y ′, we haveF (x , y) ≤ F (x ′, y ′)
Definition.
We say that F : X 2 → X is order-preservable if it is ≤-preserving forsome ≤
Q: Given an associative and quasitrivial F , is it order-preservable?
Order-preservable operations
Definition.
F : X 2 → X is said to be ≤-preserving for some total ordering ≤ on X iffor any x , y , x ′, y ′ ∈ X such that x ≤ x ′ and y ≤ y ′, we haveF (x , y) ≤ F (x ′, y ′)
Definition.
We say that F : X 2 → X is order-preservable if it is ≤-preserving forsome ≤
Q: Given an associative and quasitrivial F , is it order-preservable?
Order-preservable operations
Definition.
F : X 2 → X is said to be ≤-preserving for some total ordering ≤ on X iffor any x , y , x ′, y ′ ∈ X such that x ≤ x ′ and y ≤ y ′, we haveF (x , y) ≤ F (x ′, y ′)
Definition.
We say that F : X 2 → X is order-preservable if it is ≤-preserving forsome ≤
Q: Given an associative and quasitrivial F , is it order-preservable?
Order-preservable operations
(∗)
-
6
π1 orπ2
π1 orπ2
max-
max-
2-quasilinearity : a ≺ b ∼ c ∼ d =⇒ a, b, c, d are not pairwise distinct
Theorem
Assume the axiom of choice.
F is associative, quasitrivial, and order-preservable
m
∃ - : F is of the form (∗) and - is 2-quasilinear
Order-preservable operations
(∗)
-
6
π1 orπ2
π1 orπ2
max-
max-
2-quasilinearity : a ≺ b ∼ c ∼ d =⇒ a, b, c, d are not pairwise distinct
Theorem
Assume the axiom of choice.
F is associative, quasitrivial, and order-preservable
m
∃ - : F is of the form (∗) and - is 2-quasilinear
Order-preservable operations
(∗)
-
6
π1 orπ2
π1 orπ2
max-
max-
2-quasilinearity : a ≺ b ∼ c ∼ d =⇒ a, b, c, d are not pairwise distinct
Theorem
Assume the axiom of choice.
F is associative, quasitrivial, and order-preservable
m
∃ - : F is of the form (∗) and - is 2-quasilinear
Order-preservable operations
-
6
1 2 3 4
1
2
3
4
< < <
r r r rr r r rr r r rr r r r����
1
2
3
4
-
6
2 4 3 1
2
4
3
1
∼ ≺ ≺
r r r rr r r rr r r rr r r r2
4
3
1
-
6
1 2 3 4
1
2
3
4
< < <
r r r rr r r rr r r rr r r r� �
1
2
3
4
-
6
2 3 4 1
2
3
4
1
≺ ∼ ∼
r r r rr r r rr r r rr r r r� �� �2
3
4
1
Order-preservable operations
-
6
1 2 3 4
1
2
3
4
< < <
r r r rr r r rr r r rr r r r����
1
2
3
4
-
6
2 4 3 1
2
4
3
1
∼ ≺ ≺
r r r rr r r rr r r rr r r r2
4
3
1
-
6
1 2 3 4
1
2
3
4
< < <
r r r rr r r rr r r rr r r r� �
1
2
3
4
-
6
2 3 4 1
2
3
4
1
≺ ∼ ∼
r r r rr r r rr r r rr r r r� �� �2
3
4
1
Final remarks
In arXiv: 1811.11113 and Quasitrivial semigroups: characterizations andenumerations (Semigroup Forum, 2018)
1 Characterizations and classifications of quasitrival semigroups by meansof certain equivalence relations
2 Characterization of associative, quasitrivial, and order-preservingoperations by means of single-plateauedness
3 New integer sequences (http://www.oeis.org)
Number of quasitrivial semigroups: A292932Number of associative, quasitrivial, and order-preservingoperations: A293005Number of associative, quasitrivial, and order-preservableoperations: Axxxxxx. . .
Some references
N. L. Ackerman.A characterization of quasitrivial n-semigroups.To appear in Algebra Universalis.
S. Berg and T. Perlinger.Single-peaked compatible preference profiles: some combinatorial results.Social Choice and Welfare 27(1):89–102, 2006.
D. Black.On the rationale of group decision-making.J Polit Economy, 56(1):23–34, 1948
M. Couceiro, J. Devillet, and J.-L. Marichal.Quasitrivial semigroups: characterizations and enumerations.Semigroup Forum, In press. arXiv:1709.09162.
J. Devillet, J.-L. Marichal, and B. Teheux.Classifications of quasitrivial semigroups.arXiv:1811.11113.
H. Langer.The free algebra in the variety generated by quasi-trivial semigroups.Semigroup Forum, 20:151–156, 1980.