Upload
dangcong
View
237
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Characterization of EvothermCharacterization of EvothermWarm Mix BinderWarm Mix Binder
Koichi Takamura, Ph.D.
BASF CorporationCharlotte, NC USA
22
Plant Mixing Temperature
Harder the asphalt, higherthe mixing temperature withHot Mix
Independent on the asphalthardiness with Evotherm
The thin water film actsas the lubricant, as thecurling stone slides onthe ice
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
58 64 70 76 82
PG grading
Pla
nt
Mix
ing
Te
mp
era
ture
,°C
Hot Mix
Evotherm
3
Emulsion based Warm Mix
Significant reduction in CO, NOx and SO2 emissionsfrom stack
McAsphalt Trial in Oct. 4-5, 2005
Plant ProductionAggregate Asphalt Compaction
Hot Mix 155oC 155
oC 145
oC
Warm Mix 125oC *95
oC 85
oC
* Emulsion temp.Av. Stack Gas Temperature
Hot Mix 162oC
Warm Mix 121oC
Fuel Oil ConsumptionLitres/Tonne
Hot Mix 11.4Warm Mix 5.2
0
20
40
60
80
CO2 x10, % CO, ppm NOx, ppm SO2, ppm
Emissions from Stack
Warm Mix Hot Mix
46%
63%
58%
81%
4
Emulsion based Warm Mix
CO Emission
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
8:40 8:50 9:00 9:10 9:20 9:30
Time, minute
Co
ncen
trati
on
,p
pm
Hot mix (10/04/2005)
Warm Mix(10/05/2005)
SO2 Emission
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
8:40 8:50 9:00 9:10 9:20 9:30
Time, minute
Co
ncen
trati
on
,p
pm
Hot mix (10/04/2005)
Warm Mix(10/05/2005)
NOx Emission
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
8:40 8:50 9:00 9:10 9:20 9:30
Time, minute
Co
ncen
trati
on
,p
pm
Hot mix (10/04/2005)
Warm Mix(10/05/2005)
6
Temperature profile of emulsionbased Warm Mix
Recovery Procedure for Asphalt Emulsion Residue Need to represent the mixing and paving
conditions
Location Temp., °C
Mixing temperature 130Discharge temperature 100In hopper of paver 97Just behind the screed of paver 92
at edge of mat 87at center of mat 92
After pneumatic roller 73Pavement 4 hrs after lay down* 52
*25mm below the surface
77
Evotherm trial by McAsphalt
Base asphalt had apenetration of 124dmm at25°C, 5s.
Asphalt cement recoveredfrom field core samples
Recovered AC from HotMix asphalt = 81dmm(63% of original value)
Recovered AC fromWarm Mix asphalt =107dmm (86% of originalvalue)
Less heat aging ofasphalt cement at themix plant
40
60
80
100
120
Pe
ne
tra
tio
na
t2
5°C
,d
mm
Base
AC
Rec
'dAC
from
HM
A
Rec
'dAC
from
WM
A
63% of
original
86%
8
Residue recovery procedure
Dry the emulsion at 80°C for 20 hours
80g emulsion in a PAV pan (~ 50gresidue)
Maintain stable polymer network
Recovered residue = Equivalent ofRTFOT sample of the hot mix AC
RTFOT simulate heat oxidation of AC at thehot mix plant
SHRP and other bindercharacterizations of recoveredresidue
Emulsion Residuewith 3% SBR Latex
100m
99
Residue recovery procedure
The new procedure closely simulate heat hardening ofEvotherm warm AC as penetration values
40
60
80
100
120
Pen
etr
ati
on
at
25°C
,d
mm
Base AC Rec'd AC from
HMA
Rec'd AC from
WMA
Ramada trial
63% of
Base AC
86%
0
20
40
60
80
100
Pe
ne
trati
on
at
25°C
,d
mm
Base AC Base after
RTFOT
Rec'd WM
residue
Binder characterization
56% of
Base AC
89%
10
Residue recovery procedure
Asphalt binder becomes brittleupon oxidation in the field Reduce fatigue and cold fracture
resistance of pavement
PAV: Laboratory simulation ofoxidative aging of asphalt binder 100°C at 2.1MPa pressure for 20
hours
Stable polymer network even afterthe PAV-aging
Residue after PAV
100m
Recovered residue
Emulsion Residue with 3% SBR Latex
11
Before and After PAV (FTIR)
Polymer modification does not prevent asphalt oxidation
Unmodified
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
900100011001200130014001500160017001800
Wavenumber, cm-1
Ab
so
rpti
on
After PAV
R-SO-R'COOH
R-CO-R'
R-CHO
3% SBR polymer modified0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
900100011001200130014001500160017001800
Wavenumber, cm-1
Ab
so
rpti
on
After PAV
BdR-SO-R'COOH
R-CO-R'
R-CHO
12
Oxidative Hardening (Base asphalt/Unmodified residue)
Base asphalt shows sharp increase in complex modulus, G*, after PAV
Less significant hardening with Evotherm warm mix
Base asphalt after RTFOT Evotherm warm mix after PAV
Base asphalt
0.00001
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
-30 -15 0 15 30 45 60 75
Temperature, °C
Co
mp
lex
mo
du
lus
,M
Pa
After PAV
after
RTFOT
Neat asphalt
Unmodified Residue
0.00001
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
-30 -15 0 15 30 45 60 75
Temperature, °C
Co
mp
lex
mo
du
lus,
MP
a
after PAV
Rec'd residue
Unmodified Residue
0.00001
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
-30 -15 0 15 30 45 60 75
Temperature, °C
Co
mp
lex
mo
du
lus
,M
Pa
Base asphalt
after RTFOT
Rec'd residue
after PAV
13
Before and After PAV (Physics)
Modification with SBR latex-polymer reduces negativeeffects of hardened asphalt at wide temperature range
Unmodified residue
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
-30 -15 0 15 30 45 60 75 90
Temperature, °C
Co
mp
lex
Mo
du
lus
[G*]
,M
Pa
After PAV
Before PAV
Oxidative hardening
(a) SBR latex modified
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
-30 -15 0 15 30 45 60 75 90
Temperature, °C
Co
mp
lex
Mo
du
lus
[G*]
,M
Pa
After PAV
Before PAV
(b)
0.4 Hz
14
Before and After PAV
7°C reduction in Tg with 3% SBR latex polymer
5°C increase in Tg after PAV, both unmodified and modified residues
Unmodified
10
100
-30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5
Temperature, °C
Lo
ss
Mo
ulu
s(G
"),
MP
a
Tg=-16°C Tg=-11°C
After
PAV
(a) 3% SBR Latex
10
100
-30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5
Temperature, °C
Lo
ss
Mo
du
lus
(G")
,M
Pa
After PAV
Tg=-23°C
Tg=-18°C
(b)
0.4 Hz
15
Cold Fracture Resistance: Stiffness with BBR
Improved Cold Fracture Resistance with Evotherm warm mix
Base asphalt after RTFOT Evotherm warm mix after PAV
100
1000
1 10 100 1000
Time, s
Cre
ep
Sti
ffin
ess,
MP
a
-18°C
Base Asphalt after
PAV: m-value = 0.31
Base Asphalt after
RTFOT: m-value = 0.38
Rec'd Residue after PAV:
m-value = 0.35
16
Bending Beam Rheometer
All binder samples are afterthe PAV-aging
Even unmodified residue islower creep stiffness than thebase asphalt used to makethe emulsion
SBR latex polymer furtherreduce the stiffness, thusmaintain low temp. flexibility100
1000
1 10 100 1000
Time, s
Cre
ep
Sti
ffn
es
s,
MP
a
Unmodified
residue
3% SBR
modified
residue
-18°C
Base Asphalt
1717
Fatigue Resistance under Repeated StressesUnmodified Binders
Base asphalt after RTFOT Evotherm warm mix after PAV
Unmodified Residue
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
0 30 60 90 120
Cumulative time, minutes
Co
mp
lex
mo
du
lus
,M
Pa
10%strain
5%strain
1%strain
0.1% strain
Unmod. Res., after PAV
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
0 30 60 90 120
Cumulative time, minutes
Co
mp
lex
mo
du
lus,
MP
a
7°C
Base AC, after RTFOT
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
0 30 60 90 120
Cumulative time, minutes
Co
mp
lex
mo
du
lus,
MP
a
1% strain
5%strain
10%strain
0.1% strain
1818
SBR Polymer Modified Residue
Evotherm with 3.0% SBR latex maintains excellent fatigue resistance
even after PAV --- Extended service life with >2% latex
1.5% SBR, After PAV
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
0 30 60 90 120
Cumulative time, min.
Co
mp
lex
mo
du
lus,M
Pa
1% strain
5% strain
10%
strain
1.5% SBR modified
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
0 30 60 90 120
Cumulative time, min.
Co
mp
lex
mo
du
lus,
MP
a
3.0% SBR, After PAV
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
0 30 60 90 120 150 180
Cumulative time, min.
Co
mp
lex
mo
du
lus,
MP
a
7°C
20%strain
19
Pavement Longevity
4, 20, 44 and 94 hours PAV-aging
FTIR for Chemistry
DSR for rheological measurements
– Binder samples were too brittle to do theBBR measurements after 44 hrs PAV-aging
20
Accelerated oxidative aging test (PAV)
SBR polymers remain even after 94 hrs PAV
McAsphalt PG58-28, 3% SBR Latex Modified Residue
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
900100011001200130014001500160017001800
Wave number, cm-1
Ab
so
rpti
on
6hr PAV
44hr
94hr
Butadiene
Neat asphalt
McAsphalt PG58-28, Unmodified Evotherm Residue
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
900100011001200130014001500160017001800
Wave number, cm-1
Ab
so
rpti
on
Neat asphalt
24 hr PAV
44 hr
94 hr R-SO-R'
R-COOH
R-CO-R'
R-CHO
2121
Accelerated oxidative aging test (PAV)
SBR polymers remain even after 94 hrs PAV-aging
McAsphalt PG58-28, 3% SBR Latex Modified Residue
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
900100011001200130014001500160017001800
Wave number, cm-1
Ab
so
rpti
on
6hr PAV
44hr
94hr
Butadiene
Neat asphalt
McAsphalt PG58-28, Unmodified Evotherm Residue
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
900100011001200130014001500160017001800
Wave number, cm-1
Ab
so
rpti
on
Neat asphalt
24 hr PAV
44 hr
94 hr R-SO-R'
R-COOH
R-CO-R'
R-CHO
50m
After 94hrs PAV-aging
22
Pavement Longevity: Ergon/Valero in Texas
Reduced Oxidative hardening of SBR latex modified residue.
0
3
6
9
12
1 10 100
Hours in PAV-aging
Co
mp
lex
Mo
du
lus
[G*]
at
25°C
,M
Pa
Base Asphalt
Unmod. Residue
3% SBR Mod. Residue
SHRP Procedure
25
35
45
55
65
1 10 100
Hours in PAV-aging
Ph
as
eA
ng
le,
deg
ree
Valero PG64-22
2323
Pavement Longevity: McAsphalt in Canada
Reduced Oxidative hardening of SBR latex modified residue,even after >20 years of service
25
35
45
55
65
1 10 100
Hours in PAV-aging
Ph
ase
an
gle
,d
eg
ree
McAsphalt PG58-280
5
10
15
20
1 10 100
Hours in PAV-aging
Co
mp
lex
Mo
du
lus
at
19
°C,
MP
a Base asphalt
Unmod. Residie
3% SBR Mod. Residue
24
Pavement Longevity: Shell China
Reduced Oxidative hardening of SBR latex modified residue
Consistent conclusion with 3 widely different asphalt
0
5
10
15
20
1 10 100
Hours in PAV-aging
Co
mp
lex
Mo
du
lus
at
13
°C,
MP
a
Base Asphalt
Unmodified Residue
3% SBR Mod. Residue
25
35
45
55
65
1 10 100
Hours in PAV-aging
Ph
ase
An
gle
at
13°C
,d
eg
ree
Shell China PG64*-22
25
Conclusions
Potential Pavement Longevity with WarmMix System Reduced oxidative hardening of asphalt binder during
the mixing and paving processes
D. Newcomb, the Vice President-Research & Technology,National Asphalt Pavement Association, states “Binder aging is directly related to the production temperature of the
mixture. The majority of binder hardening due to aging takes place inthe hot-mix plant. If the plant temperature is reduced, the oxidativehardening of the binder will be reduced. Less hardening of the binderduring construction could mean more flexibility and resistance tocracking in service. ---”
26
Reference
Davidson, J.K., Lubbers, C., Takamura, K., Proc.Canadian Technical Asphalt Assoc. 52, 297-324(2007)
Takamura, K., Road Materials and PavementDesign 9, 87-102 (2008)