Upload
vudat
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Ill illls lill,ll ch;lpLcl a illllllllary of the observations dwlllg ti,e study
of Llle coollclallve supel b;l/a<l~s ol Alldllra Pradesll and collc]uslons dlaWll we
p~ese~ltctl Aftel $1 5tully ol'tllc f~lcts, leal~tles and ncba] financial pelfonnmce
In gcllCI.ll illlll ~ l l lk l l l l : ~ c l l ~ l t : l I ~ ] ~ l f ~ l l I I ~ l l c e 111 pattlcular of fifteen selected
COnFLllllCl C O - O ~ ~ C I C ~ I I V I : i I I I l C I bil~dfll? of tllc Illlee leglons of Alldlua Ptadesll
(klyai;l5cclll~l. ('0;lii;ll i<cyloll alltl l'elengalla), ( l u n g a pellod of tell yeus,
(1991-92 lo 2000-OI), solne wo~knble measules ale suggested in tlus chapter to
ovclcotnc tllc bnt~le~lccks [ I ~ ; I L have bcc11 obshschng the workulg of the smple
nolls I : t~~t l~e l , lo tollc 111) t l~c pcr[olm;ll~ce of these soc~et~es some viable
\llggChtlOllb i l lC i11'10 ~llgg~'1tCd I11 t l l l~ ~ ~ l i l l l t ~ l
I hc~~tct~c; l l ly lilt L O I I S ~ I I I ~ C I as the creatol and ptovlder of appottutnty to
V ~ I I I O I I S sectols of ccotlolny l ~ k c ~lldustty, agrlcaltu~e, trade etc, 1s supposed to be
a leal h111g 111 llle ~ I I S I I I C S S wotltl 11'i the entlle economlc actlvlty revoIves uound
Ill111 13111 111 teal~ty 11c llns lclegilted to s backwmtl posltlon, as a pelson of no
conscqucncc In tllc lliilrket l n ~ l ~ c u in fact he has been the vichm of the ~uthless
ant1 exploltll~g ~n~tltllctnca 111 the cl~annels of d~sfnbubo~i slncc tune nnrnc~nor~d
Wttllo~tt tile CUS~OII IC~ 'S rteetl al~tl demmd for a product or semces, no llldustry
call extst ~ l l e survival i~nd prosperity of an uldustry lnnlnly depends upon the
extent to which it meets the sitoshct~on of the consumer Butyethls lntelests
the most neglected by those who prosper at hls expense. They have created an
ellvtronlnent in whtch they seem to enjoy all monopoly and abnormnl at
the coql ol Loll~il~rlcfs fh'cil f l k l live decr~tles aftel. tlie dawn of lIldependetlce
am counlty. lhc cll l l~lllnc~ co11lll1llCS to trap In the explo~tatlv~ siluattoll
Exl~loltlng bi~s~tlcuilnen 111111 ln~dtlle~ncn lntlulge 111 v ~ l o l l s malplactlces
such ;IS L I I I ~ ~ C I - W ~ I ~ ~ I I I I ~ I I ~ , atlultelat~oi~ of goods, sellltig of tnfetio~, spmlous and
dlipJ~~;ile ~ n o ~ l r . ~ni?cl~~cvrior :and eiideatlrng adve~t~sements, fixlllg i~ratlotial
and c x o l l ~ ~ l ; ~ ~ ~ t pllbCi, llc-1111 $ale\, fill% glolilllg of goods 81id lilbellng, l l ~ d l r ~ ~
I I I ~ ~ ~ T I , I I I U I I 1111 llle pack111g slrout (lie Feattules of goods, lack of ptonipt setvlce
artct siilca, lllc hcllltlg uf cxplletl mctilcltles, snd a f i ~ ~ f e r ~ o ~ and dupllcnie and
llillllllul lllcrll~lllcs llllll $0 on
I'llc qltoc~llon of cotison~e~s i u fa1 1io111 snt~sfilctory, not ollly in India but
illso 111 tlic I I ~ I I C I ( I C V C ~ O ~ ) I I ~ ~ Coi~nllles COIISLI I~~IS ale getielally taken for
gtantetl 'llic clltlic c ~ i ~ s l ~ i t ~ g burden of exo~bitant prlces of co~nlnod~hes IS
t ~ a n s f c ~ ~ c i l to I ~ I C I I ' i l~~illdets It IS nntli~al that a cotnpcllll~g need is felt not o~ily
to club tllc melpiaclices o r plofit-scckiug bi~s~nessmen but illso for an effective
alte~nntlve t l ~ s l ~ ~ b a t ~ o n system to safeguard the 111tetest of consumels A system
has to bc rlcslgncd, adoptctl and ~ml~lemented III such a way as to elllnlnate
~ ~ n s c t u p o l o ~ s m~dillc~nco, and ilnetl~~oal bustnessmen md all the~r m~des~rable
and llatrnfill busll~ess ptnct~ces
In oui comltry a numbel of mensules have been introduced fiom m e to
tlmc to t l ~ ~ e c t ;lnd cotltrol the d~slrlbution system However, expellence has
diown that these coj~trols have not been sufficiently effective to Pfotect
Interest of consumers. Sometllnes the efforts of the government seem to have
becirlne futilc exelclscs 11 Is ev~denl that the state ltitemelltloll alone is not
adequate to solve lllc ploble~ns in t l~e ma~ket er~vllollmellt tllose
consumets I-lcn~c, the llcetl for ndopttng c o m p l e ~ n e n t ~ uld supplemetltuy
rneil?liruq I~ac [)OCII i l l~ l lg ly felt to tackle effic~entiy the social alld
menacc 01 L(III$IIIIIL.I C X P I O I ~ R ~ I O I I III fact t h ~ n k ~ ~ ~ g 011 S U C ~ I lines 8s tliese llJs led
to l l ~ c s t ; ~ ~ t ~ n g (11 con5~1111el co-opelilbves to handle the lmpoltant d ~ s n t b ~ t ~ ~ ~
actlvlly
C o ~ ~ s u m c l co-opc~altves arc voluataly ilssoctatlons of coilsulncls
theu~selvcs lo ntgillllsc tlie procurerneat ant1 dlstrlbut~on of essent~al food ~ t e ~ ~ i s
to cu111 lllu cnpll)~litlt~)r~ in the rnil~ket In 0111 coi~i~try they ale ass~gned a p~votnl
~o lc , 21s oilc of v ; ~ ~ l o u s incnsutes takct~ lby tlre govelnrnerlt to a11e~t the pllce h~ke,
IIIIII as a soili~blc rncalls ~ O I consurnel plotectlon agirlrlsl explo~lat~on S~nce there
IS also at1 i ~ n l n ~ ~ l c n t need f o ~ add~t~onal cl~t~linels to supplement tllc eKo~ts or the
c1v11 suppl~os t l cp i~~tn~enl III tlrc d1~111butto11 of esseiltlal goods to consumers,
consume] co-opelatives alc expected to fulfil that need They ate also expected to
sul~ply goods of cltrallty at ~ensollnble pricei The Gova~lment of India has been
c o n ~ ~ n ~ t t l l ~ g 11sc1f in its silccesslvc plans to help both finnnc~ally and phystcally
constllner co-opelat~vcs on R pr~onty basls. It has been telteratlng its policy to
shcngthetl the public dlstribut~on system thtough the develo~mellt of consllmw
ca-operatives to safeguatd the Interest of consumers
The many nets enacted by t ~ t e government even firom the days before
illdependence to safeguard the atstomer, are comprehensive and ellmmate
tile i ~ t ~ l ~ c a l ~ l i y t 1 ~ 1 1 ~ 1 ~ 111 ttlc lllillktt e n v l l o n ~ n e ~ ~ t alitl prolect consumers, plovlded
[]ley ale leipeLtcctl ;lllCI llnplclnelltct~ fnltllfillly by all concerned ln iettel Nld
s11111t Ih~ t t11:lt is !lot ll,lll~clllng All the ~ncasuies taken by the goverllment
illiecrerl : I ~ ~ I I I I \ ~ 1110 i l l l t l - \ o c I : ~ ~ clc~lletlts In the p~odiict~on atld
sy$tcm ('o~isolncl L I I - L I ~ I C ~ ; I ~ ~ V C I ilte asilgnerl all impoltult role to plolriote a
~ l l o l ~ g con\11111c1 ~p111lcc11o11 lllovcllielit, ape11 fioln plovldlng trade to suppott to
tlic pi~blic tl~\trlIxltlon system [ti Ihe collntly But 111 leal~ty these cooperatives
hnvc 11ot p c ~ l o l ~ n c t l ~ ~ ~ ~ l ~ ~ c s s ~ v e l y tlue to v a ~ ~ o u s wcnkncsses In the11 bllslness
Iplacllcc 'l'hcy i1:lvc fllllctl 111 lnlnllagltlg tllell ciilierit fi~llds piope~ly The11
I~qulrl~ty I ~ O S I ~ I O I I I S vcly wc;lI(, citlicl because tiley do not have the lequ~~et l
liltitls 01 111cy 1;111 lu I I I C ~ I I ; I ~ ~ I ~ I ~ I I I wlict~ tliey liavefilnds
~ ' ; I s ~ I , w111ch 1s tllc nlost I~quld cu~lent asset, 1s the lifeblood of an
~ I ~ I I I I ~ I O I I AII o~gilnlsatlon would keep 11s buslliess health as long as t11e1e 15 a
ficc flow ol' ci~sli Wl1c11 tliia ti1115, it falls slck Therefole, the management uC
cash 15 \ I I ~ I I ~ I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ [ i o ~ l a ~ i t Unless cash resources ale prope11y used arid
c b ~ ~ n ~ ~ c l c t l illto plotluctlvc nlcns, the deslred lesults In profit ~naxlmrsat~on would
!lot malc~~al t sc
A b ~ ~ s ~ ~ i c s s concern sllould have suffic~ent cash balances to remaln 10 h e
~ l u s ~ ~ i e s s w o ~ l d and to meet its obllgahons ~roperly The success of cash
inana&cmcnt depetrtls on the stnlchtre of the org~nisation The fmmcid
executive plays 8 tleclstve role in the management of oflsh, and has to perform the
valious Ful~otions in the day-to-tl;iy mwagement colltr0l of cash' The sfmcture of
otgntllmtloll V>ltlc5 IrOlll otlc lltllt LO i l t l~ t l l~ l AS CO-Operahve supel.bnzaus, ae
p~ltely tlildltlt: LI)IILC1115, [[ICY II'LV(: 110 sepalilte orga~usatlon fol cash
~nanagcn~cllt, ~ l l l i l l h ~ ~ ~ L S I I I C \ S toanegel himself pe~ororms the duties alld
flinct~oni ol the iilld11~1:l~ CXCCllltv~ '11111s 811 tlie fin~nclal nctlvttie~ levo]Ye
810111111 llllll
111 I ~ I L I 11 1 5 , I I L ~ I I O I I Lo I I I I ~ ~ C tI1c op~lat~ol ls of n co-opelnttve hus~ness, as it
effictcncy of tlch~o15 111 o ~ a k ~ n g pilymeots, size of lnveatoly, slze of sales tn
telalion to lixcil ,ts$cls illlll 50 011 1 o cetlillll exteet, by cornpat~~ig tlte h~sto~lcal
I C C U I ( I \ 01 011c C O - O I ) C I B I I V ~ lltiit w~lll Illo~e of anothel, ant1 also its owti iecotds
ove~ 11 I ~ C I I I K I rll IIIIIC, 61 L O - ~ P C I B ~ I V C 11ii1t CBEI a~i lve nt an ~ d e a of tts ~ U S I I I ~ S S
o p c ~ n t l o ~ ~ s I ) ~ l l c t c ~ i t latlos can lie ~ ~ l c u l a t e d and nntilysed to assess the use of
caih f o ~ rlic bu51ncss upctilrlons I ; ~ r ~ a ~ ~ c t a l lut~os l ~ k e cash to cullent assets, cusll
lo cutlcnt l ~ , ~ b ~ l ~ t t c s , c s d ~ lo total oscets n~ld casl~ tultiover of bustness, uluts cat1
be lnatle to 115ec.i~ ~l lcu ctfic~c~icy in the lnnllhgelnellt of cash Any slgnlficn~~t
vallatlon 111 LIICSC I ~ L I O S 111ay be v~ewetl as clue to a lack of propel rnnnagc~nellt af
cnsl~ balacwcs 'I'hc co-opc~atlve super bazoals of Andun Pmdes11 have been
viewed from thls po~n t o f view 111 the presellt study.
The stzc of cash balances 111 the super bnzaals of Matnatha, Bala~1, Kadhin,
h a n t a p a r stid f+oddnhl~ Supel Baanors In Raynlaseema, wiuch 1s a p a of the
&lea, 1s seem slgruficu~tly fluch~als dur~ng the penod of shldy. In the Bal&jl
Super Bnzaa~ 8 large amoullt of cash balance (4 04 lnkhs) remmed, wluch was
mucli l a~gc i Lllili~ tllc b ~ i l a ~ i ~ c + in (lie othei fom co.operatlves ~h~ cash
ba lan~c lcgl\tclctl 111 tllc Mao~atlia Supel Ri~znal was Rs 0 65 lalths, tile
Kntlhi~~ Srl[)cl I{n/;l;il 0 64 lakiis, in tlie Anantapur Sllper Bazaar was R~ 1 35
lakl~? iii~tl III 1l1c I'lotltlnlu~ Supel Raz;~ai was Rs 2 43 18Hls while the co.
erficiciit 01 vtilliln~c ~lltlic~ite\ inLonriitellcy in the malntenaice of casll balallces
atnong tllc I tinit$, tlic ~oi i \ol ld~ted CO-efficleiit of V ~ I I ~ I I O I I
c o l ~ s ~ s t c ~ ~ c y (0 41) III tlic illallagelneilt of cash
'l'lic S I / C 01 c;lil~ bala~ice:, II I lhe siiper bazaars of tile Coastal 1eg;on
fl~~ccn;~lctl ~nodc~atc ly tluiiiig tlic slutly pe~lod The Visakl~apalnam Supel Bazaa~
l~atl t l ~ c I,lil:csL 'iniount ot ~IVeliIge ~ t ~ s h balance (Rs I l 20laklis) The Kalpavalli
icco~rlctl 1111 ;iveiiigc li:~l;~i~cc ot Rs I IXlakhs, Stikekulam lecolded Rs 1 2lla!&s,
tllc VSI' Rs 5 L)ll;lklis, V~s;~kl~al~nt i~am Rs 11 20 Iaklis, aiid Oligole recorded a
1ial;111cc o i Ks 2 31 l a l t l ~ ~ 'The s u e of ave~age cash balances shows vatlances 111
ioaintaisocc ol'casli in thcse salnlile supei bazaa~s of the Constal ~ e g ~ o n The co-
cfficlelit of vailnncc nltllcatcs consistency in tile Kalpavalli Super Bazaai (0 34)
In the inillntcmincc of cnsh balances bettel than the otl~er supcl bazaals
rile size of cast1 bdances 111 the selected supet bazaars of Telalgana
var~ed sl~glltly during the study pelloci In Katnadhenu the aYera8e size of cflsl~
was Rs 0.861akhs, 111 Anjeni Rs.1 39lakhs, m Neelaglrl Rs 0 891dls,
Kalpnlilthn Rs, 2 57 and la Adalsha it was RS 0.6llakhs The covefficle1lt
v ;u~a~ice tndioates l~igll in~oiisistency ln die Kmadienu SnPei Bazaal 'Id
conclrtcncy 111 lhc i l l ; l i ~ ~ l c ~ ~ ; t ~ ~ c c ol cc~sh balances In tile ~ ~ [ ~ ~ l ~ t h ~ supel B~~~~~
(0 27)
' 1 1 1 ~ c:l\ll I Ll l l lC l l t IlF5CtS latlo In the sample supel bazaals of
Rayal:~~ccrn~l ~ i l t ~ l ~ ; ~ l c ~ n I I I C ~ I I I V , I I U C I0 59 per cent [t observed that all he
sopci l)i~/;IiIl~ IliItI ltllc C;I \~I l ) a l ; l ~ i ~ e ~ III Illell bilslness operations TIle average
llic fatlo ~ e g l \ l c ~ c t l 111 MillllillIld WiIT 2 78 pet cent, 111 B a l ~ j ~ 13 05 pel cent,
Katll1111 17 43 p c ~ ccnl, la Aaantliapul 3 70 pet cent, and in Ploddab1 it wns
15 98 11" cud 1311t lllc vtllue or co-cffic~ent of vanatton was least (0 5 8 ) in the
A I ~ ~ I I ~ ~ ~ I I I S I I ~ C I I(a/ael, w l l ~ c l ~ illtl~cates conl~ol over cash bnlences
I hc ~ d ' i h 10 C I I I I C I I L a\sct\ lloslt~on in the snmple supel bazaais in the
CoilsL;~I I C ~ I ~ I I ~ c v c , ~ l i i l ~ i i t lllc lucati value l~nged fiom 3 81 pel cent to 9 54 pel
cell1 W I I I I ell i ivc~i~ge of 6 XO pcl ccllt Among the md~vtdunl units, I<alpavnlll
leco~tlutl it11 ;rvclagc [atlo of 5 20 11c1 cent, Sl~kakslam 7 I9 per cent, (he VSP
8 12 1x1 CCIII V~s;~l,lrapatnnm 7 67 ~ I C I cent, I U I ~ Ongole reg~steted 5 63 pel cent
Rut tile v;lIuc of co-crfic~cnt of vai~iit~oil was least (0 32) in the Knlpavnll~ Super
Raznar, wli~ch ~ ~ i d ~ c a t e s tllc en te~pl l~e ' s control over cash balances
' I ' I I ~ cash to cllrtent asset$ posltlon III the smple super bazntu8 of
Telaegii~in ~cvenls that the iuean value ranged from 8.55 per cent to 16 63 Per
cent wtll it11 averwge of 12 19 pel celit The avemge ratio recorded In K m d h e n u
was 5 19 per cent, m hnjani 8 77 per cent, in nee la^ 679 pel cents
Kalpalatlia 5 62 pel ccllf and 111 Adarsha 34 56 per cent during the s l u r i~ period
~h~ co-cl l i~ lc l \ t t l f V i l l ~ t I t l t l ~ l was lowest ((1 15) In the Kalpnlatha Supel B~~~~
wlllcll i ~ ~ t l ~ c , ~ l e ~ collrlstcllcy Ill tllc LOI~IIO[ ofcasl~ balanceS
III l< . i y~~ l~ l \~c i l l i l tllc aveiagc c.1i11 to tot111 assets labos of the ~lalllapm
~ u p c ~ Il.~/,r;lr ( 1 (15 IICI LCIIO c l l l ~ l llle Mrunalha S I I ~ ~ ~ I Bazaar (1 97 pel cent) wele
less t11~111 l1111it: (11 IIIC lllll~l 5II1lCI ~ l c l / i ~ i l l ~ 111 the otlle~ thee slipel bazaals tile
~ntros rvcic 7 '10 IICI LL.III. 11) 5 IJCI cc11t i111d 10 58 llcr cent in tlle Btli~Jl, 1 i ~ d i ~ ~ ~ ~
al l t l ~~Io~II~:~IIII S l l l l ~ l Iiil/iiill': ICSIICC~IVCIY It I S filltl~ei cvident that legaldlng the
COIISI~ICIILY 01 L.ISII llillilli~~ i l~ ld l l lg In lelatiori to total assets, tile A o a l ~ t ~ ~ ) ~
Sul)c~ I~~I/,I:II (11 55) I111(1 J:IC:IICI COIISI~~CIICY than tl~c clthets In the legloll
111 l l lc ~(lil'lllll ICgIOII, Lllc tIVelIlgl: CHS~L to total assets ratla was less in the
IC:IIP,IV,IIII SII~ICI I~:I/:IIII ( I 611 IICI ccr~t), whrcli itid~~ates effectwe ulilisritron o f
C I S I I L N C X ~ LOIIIC 111 LIIII~'I l l le Ongole Supei Bazaa~ (4 08 pel cent), the
VI~,I~~I,I~),IIII~IIII SIIIICI liillilr~~ (4 31 1x1 cent), Si~kakulilrn Supel Bazaal (5 56 pn
ccot), end r11c VSI1 Sopel Ib,i/;i;it (6 21 pet cent) Regaid~ng the cons~stei~cy of
c,lsli II:I~IIIIC~ ho ld~~ ig 111 ~e l i i l lo l~ to tolal assets, the Kalpavalll Supel Bazan~
(0 21) hat1 fi~v;~iet collalstctlcy Illail ihc otl~ei super bazaats
111 I clnnjiail;~, tcgartl~ng the avelage ens11 to total assets ratio of the sample
supci hs~aars Kii~nnrllicnu hnd n lesser latlo with 3 37 P cent than the otllels
I<eg;ll~[lllN tile conslstency of iioldil~g cash balance in relation to total assets,
Kalpnlntllo lla(l consistency o f 0 20 wlirle Katmdhenu ]lad an lnconslstency
of1 3 1
In all tllc \:1111llle UIl l tS 01 lllc Coastal legloll the pelcentage of cash to
~utlcti! I I~II) I I :~ICS st[:i~lli~i~lllly t l ~ l ~ t l l i ~ l ~ d TIIC iivelnge ratio valtetl between 5 56
pet L C I I ~ ~ I I I ( I I? 51 C C ~ I ~ tvltll a conslstellcy o r 0 2 9 l~td~v~doally I<nlpavall~
~c~c l~ t l e t l 5 1 5 [ICI Lcnl, S t ~ I ( i ~ h t ~ l i t t ~ ~ l l O l pel ccol, tllc VSP 11 36 pel cent,
Vtc:1ltlral1:1111,11n 0 5 0 pct cenl, ilntl 011gole icco~tlcd 12 46 per cent The co-
cffic~ellt ol v i ~ r i i ~ l ~ o ~ ~ dlows tl~;it Ki1l1mvnlli mnlnt81neil co~ts~ste~ioy 111 the othel.
S!I~IU I I I I ~ ~ I ~ I I S IIOWCVCI 1 1 1 ~ C O - C ~ ~ ~ C I C I I ~ O ~ V ~ I I B ~ I O I I valttes wete as Iitgll as 0 86 In
S~ ik i tku l i~~~l , il 61 ill llle VSI', 0 51 111 V~snkllap~t~la~n, and 0 49 111 0:lgoIe These
petcc11t;tgc~ sllow I ~ S I C I C~II IPISICIICY
I:, Iclcngimn 111c 11ctcc:ltcge of cash to cunent i~abtl~iles ltnd wlda
f l ~ ~ c t u a t i o ~ ~ s 111 lllc r \ d n ~ s l ~ a natl the Neelnglrt Super B a a a s l%e nvelage ratlo
ataotig Ilslu vocIed betwcc~l 3075 per ce11t and 331 15 per cent with a low
collslsiency of 1.08.
Ful[hcr tllc coefficiellt of variat~on regatdlflg cash to cwellt )~~bl]ll les
iatlo, Kalpale(hn (0 16) ll]d~cnted consistency lrnpiyillg that tl1e super bazaiU'had
nn cffect1ve colltro] over ~ t s cnsh and current Labditles. On the ConUaT m lhe
OIIICI \111icl l r ; l / ~ , l l \ 1 1 1 ~ LO-~~~~LICIII o f V~II~CI~IO~I viill~e was as hlg6 as 123 ," the
kiolleilllcllil ~ i l l d Ill? A(lrllgjld SUIICI ll:l/:14l'i, 0 90 111 Neclaglrl, 0 54 ln
AII~~III I c ' ~ L ( I I I Z I \ I C I I L Y \VII\ II(IIICC~ Ill tlicse supei irazaals 111 exelclslng
c r r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ( ~ t n l ( ~ l ov t :~ l l l c l l I~'IIICLIIVC LII~II [II~SIIIO~IS
I<C~!.IIIIIIII! IIIC LII~I IIIII~OVCI ICIIIU orilie wlle1 bazaa~s of Rayalaseema, all
lllc \ ; i l~ l l~ lc illill'r HCIICI~IC~ I~IKIICI VI~~LIIIIU ~ f b t l l ~ s w l t l ~ lessel casll balances all([
Ir;ld (1 LLIIIZI\L~IIL~ 111 (1 54 OII tln livclsgc (l~ll~ll: tlle study period Mamatliahad a
vcly lllj!li CIV~I . I~C ~ d \ I l L L I I I I ~ V ~ I 1il110 (303 10 Illiles) a~ld P~oddaim hnd oiily a
Iovv l:lllo ill ,I2 3 0 l l I l l C S
avclagc t l u ~ ~ n f i tllc slrldy I~CIIII~ S~~kakulem had a lughel ilverage casll hrl:lover
I;lllo ( 1 X X I I 1111ics) nlitl tile V~sakhi~pi~tnam Supel Bazaar had only n ~nnove i of
83 5111111c\
'I lit ~c l ;~ t lon t l l~p l~c twcc~ l cash and sales of the sample supel bnznnts 111
7'clnt1g;ln;i icvct~ls ( l~al allliost all tile sample umts generated hrghet volume of
sales w ~ l h lcsacr casll bnlarlces The Adnshn Super Bazaar, howeve1 had a
Co~~s~stcncy 011 all nvelsge of 0.49. Kalnodhenu had the h~ghest average casll
t l l l i love~ lntlrl (207.34 times) and Adarshs had tlie lowest (16.01 tlmes) Alld
I(8lpaltithn llad better co~lsistency m respect of effective Uollsatlon of ash
lesolr~cc ill I~JJIIS orsales than the otl~er sa~nple units
In I<,~y.il,irccli~~i .ill lllc s ~ l i l ~ l i l c allpci ba~an~s ieg]stered a mixed
tiaid In s.iic\ ant1 L i l 4 l l>dlli~1~cs I IIC ~i\ill balances ~eco~t led posittve glowtll
late lrclwcull 2') l1)l]cl LC l l l ill 1 'J')l-')i illid 153 10 11e1 cell[ clullng 1997.98 over
llie IIIWYIII\ yc,II l l~l l i l l l~~\ 111 L~ ls I l ( ~ ~ g i l l d l i l g the sales volu~ne of the supel
ba~;i;lis 111 tllc ICgI(III. I~IC W(I\VI~I IiilC vc l l l~d b13w~ell il positive late o f 33 56 per
ceill .~ i i t l .I ~ i cg~ i l l v c i a l l e 111 111 25 11ci LCI I~
l l l c c',lllllIltctl i l l i C i i l l c g l c s ~ l ~ l i l cq111Llloil shows no slgnllicii~~t effect of
sales t r l l L,I~II ~ ' i ~ 1 1 1 1 I/IC IC~IIIL (11 I'-V~I~UC, i t IS foeid flint 21 05 pel cent of
vi111iitit111 III ~ i ~ s l ~ II~IIBIILC\ I\ C\~II~II~IC~ l)y tile sales volume d ~ l ~ ~ n g the pellod of
,tilily
I l ~ c ji i lcr iilltl L~I\II IIII~~IIILCI oI' ~IIC SBII~~I~C SII~CI bmaars of h e Coastal
~cg~orr iel:ialc~ctl i~ 1111xct1 t~ct l t l t r l 110111 posit~vc iltld llegatlvc g~owths The cash
b;ll;~n~ci t lc~ l inor l clvc~ l l ~ c IIICVIII~I:. yeiil's bnlaaces, 19 14 per cellt in 1992-93,
51 94 11ci c c n ~ 111 1001-91, 3 0 51 pel cc~ i t in 1995-96,3446 per cent in 1997-98,
i111t1 43 84 pci cent in 190'1-2000 13ut the supel bazaars iegzstered a positive
g i t ~ w l l ~ 111lc o l b!, 06 11~1 ccnl in 1994.95. 155 52 per cent m 1996-97, 75 94 pel
cellt III 1908-99 i i i l t l 30 62 pcl cell1 i n 2000.01 Tlielr sales volume recoldcd a
IIOSI~IVC g ~ o w t l i I:I~C. ,Ille glow111 late in sales volu~ne v a ~ ~ e d betweell 1 58 per
cent ant1 I 9 1') per cclit,
F l o ~ i i h e I- vnfuc it 1s ~IIOWII that the ~elatiollslup between sales md
casl~ ~BIIIIICCS wfis very weak, ?he estimated llnear regression equahon i l l so
iod~ca(es thilt ulcle wns 110 slgnificailt effect o f the sales 011 the cash balances in
tile 1cg1o11 i ' l o l n l f l c l c ~ l l f ~ o f 1'-vilfuc, ~t is fount1 tliat tile 11 80 per cent of
vali;ltloil III Ihc LII\~I II~I~~IIILC~ 19 ~ ~ p l ~ l i i l e d by the sales
IIIC i.ilc9 ~111 i l LII\~I ~~I I I I ILC~ o f tlle sample sllper bazaars of Tc!allgana
i l low 11oll1 ~ i o ~ i l l v c #mil r~cg t~ t i vc g iow t l~s Tile g i o w l l ~ vatled f i o~n a posrtlve
1i11e o f 07 06 lpcl ~ c l l l i f i l l l l lg 1095-06 a llcglltrve ratC of 36 94 pel ce~ l t dullng
O X i l ~ c w l c \ v o l ~ i ~ ~ r c iil t11c \rlinl]le super bazail~s va~let l betweell a
pos~trvc i , ~ t c (11 26 75 pcr ceril i r i 1912-93 to a negalrve rflte of 10 95 pcr cerit 111
1990-2000 I hc I- v'liuc i i i i l~cwle i I l lat tile re la l i o~~sh~p behveel~ tllc sales ilnd
caslr 11al:in~ci was v c ~ y wc~llc A i l i l IIOIII tlic t-vi1111e i t IS ~IIOWII Illat tlieie was no
\ ~ g r i l l i ~ : ~ l ~ l IC~IIII~III~III~I OCLWCCII llre sales atid casli balnnces in the legloll The
expl;rii~crl lry l l l c salcs vo lu l l~e dnlrrig tlre pclsod
111 tile coi l lcx l of global colnpetltlve buslness rnll~eo, ieceivables
m ; i ~ i ; i g c ~ t ~ c ~ ~ t 11ilr b c ~ i ~ ~ n e no ~i lcvi tabie fentu~e of most rnrlusa~nl uluts as they rue
a t l o l~ t r i ~g c ~ c t l ~ t r a l o as cliic ol Lhe ~ n o s l IIII~IOI~~II! sales devlses Rece~~ables are
ill1 I l l l l l o ~ l a ~ ~ c LOIII~~IICII~ ol' w o ~ k111g capilal, ncxt onIy to lilvesltones
111e iivclirgc $Ire of ~ecervables in the supel bazaars of Rayalseema v i u ~ e d
fiol l l Rs 5 02 liiklls lo Its.13 63Iakhs with a cons~steacy o f 0 28 i n the
l l lnl l l tena~lce o f rcccivablcs ?'he ave:agc slze registered was US 12 51 lakhs 111
Msmatlin, i t s 8 6s liikl,s u~ UaIaj1, Rs.0 86 Lakhs In Kadlllrs, Rs 21 86 lakbs m
Anantal,ut, and 8 76 Iak11s m Pmddahlr Regarding ConslstencY In ho1dln8
~ e o c ~ v a b l e q tllc Anantapv Supel Baznnr was more consistent than the othels
llhc tivciagc il/c of lccetvnblcs in the tive super bazaus the coastn]
legion v i ~ i ~ c t l l i ~ l l l 16 12 lnklis to Rs 30 57 IRkhs Regaldlng consistency m
il"ltlil~g llte I C L C I V ~ I ~ ~ ~ C S . (he V~silkllapah~atn Supel Bazau was mole cons~stent
tllilll lllc OI I ICIS
lilt ;~vci,igc 51/c of ~c~clvt ibles In the siipet bazaats of Telangana vatted
Sioln K\ X ' ) ' ) lC~hl~j 10 It1 15 hhlt~kl~r wltll all nvvclagc of Rs 12531akl1s Arnnllg
Ll~e ~ t ~ t l i v ~ ~ l ~ i i ~ l SIIIICI I ~ i i / i i n l ~ ~ the avelage slze of recervnbles was Rs 12 41 lnklls
111 K;r~n;till~cn~t, Ila H 65 lr~k1ls 111 Alllatt~, Rs 6 57 laklls 111 Neelag~l~, Rs 3 1 81 I n
I<alp:~lall~,~ 8rntl IRs 0 21 l;~klis I I I At la~?l~a. Regadtt~g cotis~stency i n holdlt~g the
i c ~ c ~ v ~ ~ h l c i . lllc K:tll)i~lolli;i Ss1)et Bazaai was Inole consistent, and Anjnnl,
K i t ~ ~ ~ ; ~ t l l i u ~ ~ r ~ . NCC~;I~:III :111tl Atlatsha Super Aazaais followed it 111 this ottlei
'I lic avcltigc dcl~lots ttr total assets latlo in h e supel biizaals of
Ray;tl;~scc~~ia v;~tlcti w11l1 bettc~ cotlslstellcy (CV of 0 11) In the ~i~vestrnent of
tlel1lo15 111 the lolrll t~?sets l ' l~e s h a ~ e of debtors m the total assets of [he supel
b;~zoais ol llic tcgloi~ 011 ;III incinge was as follows 38 51 per cellt 111 Mn~n~tlla,
11 67 pct c c t ~ l in Ih!>i]l, 15 21 pet cent m Kadhnt, 27 32 pel cent m h l a l t ~ p u ,
alltl 37 40 pel c e ~ ~ t la Prodda(111 111 respect of the coefficient of vnllance, but ffl
the Ktttlli l~~ Supet Bazaat all 1118 others had good control over the lnvestmellt of
debtots in the total assets
In the coastal region tlre rntlo of receivables to total assels m the sample
supet b a ~ n a t s voncd slightly. The average ~ n h v ~ d u a l unit ratio was regtstercd as
15 00 pel cent 111 Kt~lpavklllfi, 25.60 per cent in Srkah~lam, 12.10 per cent
VSI', 25 70 17cl ccll l 111 Vls:ikliapntnnrn and 50 00 pel cent Ill ollgole ~~~~~d~~~
coas~stcli~Y, l l lc L ~ ~ l l i ~ ~ C l l t O f vnllallce sllows that all the supei baanls ille
cunslifcn~
111 I cl,lngllll~l, l l ic (1ebt010 to totnl ilssets valled a11 an average betweell
26 89 pul LCIII illld '11 8 5 IICI C C l l l wltll tnole collslstency dut~ng the pei~od of
5tll(ly I,IIIIII lllu ~ o c l l i ~ ~ c ~ i t of vi~tlatlce i t 1s clea~ tlliit the Kalpalatha n11d An,a~\l
SUOCI II;I/II~I( )VCIC IIIOIC COIISISLCIII t l l a ~ ~ the othets
l l ~ c ~ i l l ~ o o l tlcl~lois lo ctulenl assets a i ~ ~ o r ~ g the srlpcl bazan~s of
K i~y t~ l i ~sccn i~~ wtli l\\ oil l 1111 i111 ~velage to 43 37 pet ccnt F1or11 t l ~e col~siste~~cy
11u1111 01 vlcw ,111 llic uiiiI# lhntl I l ie l~ debto~s t~ i ide~ couhol Howevei, the
AI~IIIIIJ~IIII SIIJICI I(II/II~II l l i ~d 111oie co~~s~sbncy tl ln~i the otl~ets, w111le the l<arlllu~
SII~ICI (311/iliii liild LO III~C IIICBSLIICS icgnld i~~g the quatlhi~n of invest~nent In
rlebto~s 111 IIIIIII ovc 1111: ~(lllslbtCI1~y
I Ilc i ;~ i io 111 tlcb~ais Lo cu~ient nssets III the s11pe1 bazaars o f the Coastal
1e&to11 LVOI kb 0111 10 42 31 pet ccnt on nn avetnge 'The lltd~v~dual avelage ~a t ln
WiIS lcco~tled >IS 43 80 per ccm~t 111 Knlpavalll, 35 16 per cent in Sl~knkuinm, I b 48
p c ~ ccllt $11 VSI', 45 73 ]pel cent in V~sakl~apattlam ;ill(! 6928 per cult In Ongole.
The cor~stalc~icy shows t l~at except the VSP Bazaiu nll the otllel umts had wtder
contrill the rccclvables i n respect of current wets.
Tile iavern&e tatto of debtors to cunent assets UI the sample units uf the
Coastal legton vnned between 35 21 tunes and 45 75 times FuIdler, legardlng
tllc conskstenoy debtols' it~vestment m c~nrent assets Kalpalahfl was Inore
111 l l lu $II~ICI l l i l / l l i l 1 5 01 i(i~y,lla?eelna, tile debtors t11111ovel
\larv\ ~II;II ~ l l c rlcli lol\ j:c~lctttlcd dll l l l lg l h ~ SLMIY peuod snles with an aveingc of
I0 87 l i inc\ I ~ c ~ ~ ~ l t l l l l s ~ O l l ~ l t l C I l ~ Y 01 ~Ichi017 111 tellns of sales, the Protldatut
Supci i4ir/i1i11 \VII\ IIIOIC LOIIYIS~CII( t1li111 the otlle~ snmplc llnlts
111 t l ~ c ( ' o i ~< t~ l l ic[:loll fhc iivcl;~gc tlcbtols lulnove~ rntlo ~allged between
IS S X IIIII~\ ,intl 17 110 t1111cr l'lle average worketl oul to 2208 tunes In
gci lc~,i t l i~g ti1lc5 I I ~ 1l1c tlcllloir, lllc S~ihi~kulam wits male conslstellt tl1n11 thee
oillci < t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i I v IIIII~S 111 llic 11:1:1oii IIIC Kal[ l i~vi l l l~ S11lie1 Bazaa~ llowevet was
I I I C ~ I I I ~ I ~ I C I I I
111 IC~,III[:BIIII 111~: ilvc~ilgc i lcbt~ ls ' IUIIIOVCI ratlo among the sample units
Lllcqc I~IICIIIIIIC~~ IICIW~~II 7 OX IIIIIC? illld 47 37 tlmes, a11d the avelaged walked
I I I 1 I C 'I'IIc Adi~~sl l i i S I I~~ I B~IZIIIII was tncot~s~stel~t 111 tllis lespect
(C:V O 87) Atnl)lly lllc ol l le~ fool, the Kalpalatha Supel Bnznnr was Inole
COIISIS~CIII 1lli111 ~IIC OIIICIS It IS clcal l l ~ n l the Adusha Super B ~ ~ a a l will hnve to
cxelclsc t1811t colltlol 111 LIIC innlsteonllce o f debto~s to Improve ~ t s cons~stency
'rllc tlclltors find sales volume of the sample u~uts In Rayalaseema Wall
lccordetl n gtowitlg h.entl tlurmg thc pet~od of study excc~~t durlng two Yeas
1995-96 tint1 199(r47, In tllese two yeus the balances of debtors decreased
Col~sitlel;iI~ly the previous year's balances Tile sales volume of tile super
bs7,ilnt\ v,tllctl hi1111 lln\fllvc 1;llc O l 37 56 11el Cctlt Ill 1994-95 to altegntlve rate
of 16 25 lpcl ~ c l l r Ill I1)')X-')" ill^ l - ~ i l ~ l l e leveal~ a shong posltlve lelatlmlshlp
betweun (Ielllolll llll(1 +IIICI It 15 CII~O L ~ C ~ I I tllat there wal 8 srgnlficmi effect of
I I Ill I 1 Ill? V ~ l l t c l l l ~ ~ t l 111 79 87 pet cerlt tn the
eup l r i~~~c t l IIY Ill? r:lii'\ 111s LOIIC~IIIIIII~IIIL: I-villrie IT 5364, and i t ts lljg]lly
$ ~ g ~ r i t i ~ , ~ t r l ill I 11e1 LCIII lcvcl
1110 5,1le\ t~ntl i l c l ~ l (~ t \ ' vul~rr~rc III the rarliple liti~ts of the Coastal leglon
lecortlctl l~o l l ! [ ~ { ~ \ t l l v c ,III~ IIC!:IILIVC jilowtll rates The balances o f debto~s varred
fiort~ l<h XI) (11 li1ld15 Io 152 K 5 lc~ l~hs, a~ttl tlie e~owth rate va~tetl between a
I IC~ I I~ IV~ X *I l11c1 Lcni CIIIII l i o \ ~ l ~ v e 01 11 10 p c ~ cent The sales volutne 111 ihc
IIIIIIS ICCOI~I~II i t I~O'II~IVC !:III\VIII idle 'I'lie tln~~ual gtowtll late 111 sales volutlle
t1t1101ig 1llct11 v i~~ r i - t l 11clwec11 I 58 1pc1 cent allti 19 I9 pel cent 'rheie was a
s l ~ o t ~ g 11i1sr11w: IC~IILIIIII~~II~I bclwcetl tlte tlebtors and sales in the supet bazaats
'lhc r2-v,rluc \IIII\V\ t1t:11 llrc snlc.: cxjl lall~ the vatliition of 77 77 per cent m
tlcblots 11 15 f i ~ t ~ r ~ t l tIiii( ~IIIC t l~t i t (II'CIIRII~~ III snles ~esulted i n 0 06 amount of
chsl~gc III tlcblots 5 201 1s lllc cir~ tcy~ol ld~ng t-velue, wh~ch IS 111ghly slgalfic~at
at I 11ct CCII~ lcvcl
I'llc I~I~~IIIICC~ ol' llebto~s 111 l'elangarra supel bazaars fluctuated mall~edly
[l~tltlg ll lc pclltrtl '1.h~ volume of debtors vatled from Rs 44 96 lnkhs In 1991-92
to Its 78 3 1 lnkhs tlulltlg 1999.2000 The sales vollllne varred between Rs 213 86
lakl~s otld ~ s , i 1 8 2 67 lilklls AI,~ tile g~owth late in the sales volume ranged konl
n negative of 10 9s per cetlt to a poslt~ve rate of 26 75 pel cent The i-value
S~Iows CIC,IIIY tll<it ~ ~ I : ~ t ~ ( ~ l i l l i p I I C ~ W C C I I tlebtols nr~d sales thouglj posltlve
latl~cr wcak Ihc le\llll 111 I ' - ~ , I ~ u c SIIOWS that the sales volulne explains the
38 52 p c ~ L C I I ~ of ViI l lc l t lOl l 111 tIl:1)tlll\ I'he glvcll t.va111e (2 239) shows tllat tllere
1% 110 i i g i ~ i l i ~ i i i ~ t IlllllilCt (11 Liie uillc\ 011 lllc bnlallces of debto~s duril~g tile pellod
of tile \il~tly 5 pci L C I I ~ I C V C ~ 01 ~ I ~ I ~ I ~ ~ C : I I I C C
~11vellI~li y WIIILII 101 111s 11 ~ l lb~ l l l l l t l~ l~ 1lOltlOll ofclll~ent assets, accounts for
a p l n o ~ ~ ~ m ~ c l y 5 0 to 60 11ci ccnL ol' LI I I ICI I~ assets in [nost bus~~iess enteqlllses
P I I I ~ ~ I I ~ inilnitgclnciil of illveiltoly 1 9 lllc yilnlst~ck of effic~ency III woik~ng
cap~till ili;llI;tjiclnerll lillicicnt l ~ l i i i ~ ~ ~ g e ~ n e ~ ~ t of lllvelltory IS not an eary task and
tlc~iinntl! I);IIIILIII:II cilie of ~ I I C lillil~~clal Ileait11 oat1 earlling capacity of the
C I I ~ C I I J I ISC II:I$ 11) be i t~~l)~nvct l
'I'l~c rl/c ol tllvei1to1y in tllc sclected super bazaa~s of Rayaiaseema dm~ng
tile pci~otl t r f ' ~ t ~ ~ t i y got illole ~II;III tloobled, Ao~n Rs6391akhs a 1991-97. to
Rs I5 07lakl1s 111 2000-01 i<cgrittl~ng the ilveinge investments in l i ~ v e ~ ~ t o ~ y ,
Mi~tn~itbi~ ~cgi'itelcd KS l l 07 i;tkl~s, Hiilaji Rs 22 95 Ioklls, Kadhli Rs 2 13 lakhs,
~ l l ~ l l ~ i l ~ ~ l l l I7 26 I R ~ ~ I F illid I'l(l(ldilti11. RS 3 53 hkhs
'The co-cffic~cut of viilratlorl sliows that the Kadh~n nr~d Annntnpur super
bazaass wcle cor~slstet~t (0 20) 111 m a l ~ l i a ~ n l ~ y the Investment In mvcntones, but
the Proddat~~i Sul~cr Baznar was ~ i~co~ls~s ten t (0.54).
The avernge size of inventory in the selected super bazaars of die Coastal
legLon vr111ed only lnorlelate]y between Rs.22.73 lakhs and Rs.31.88 Iaklls, ~ l d l
an aveioge of ~s 28 62 ]&ha Tl~eir consolidated of 1nventorY shows
~oi~yt'ltCtICy 111 llliltlilji~llg l l lC I I IVCll lOl lCF, ~ l l d t h ~ CV stood at 0 I1 dullng the
~hltly I ~ ~ ~ o t I 'Ilic ~ o - c l f i c ~ ~ t l t 01 v a ~ l i ~ t ~ ~ t l I I I lllatvagtng tnvestlnent in tnverltnrles
~lltlicatci IIlzlL lllc V~i:lkIl:lpillo;lt~~ S U ~ C I Bazaat was conststent, and the other
S I I ~ I C I I I~I , I ; I IS (Sl~k:lkuldlll. VSI) i i ~ ~ ( l 1<alapavdll1, and Otlgole) following 11 111
l/ld1 O l ( l ~ 1
In lclcr~j:.~ti:~ Illc t~vct:~gc ii/c ol i t~vc l~ lo~ ic? 111 tlte sample super bazaals t:ingetl
fiom It9 'l 42 l:tkh< lo Its 8 01 iilldls, lllei~ nvetage stutds at l<s 5 33 lakils They
w c ~ c L ~ I I I C I \ I C I I ~ ( ( 'V ~too t l ill 0 24) 111 I ~ I ~ I I I ~ I ~ I I I ~ IIivcntoltes. The co-efficient of
vaii:lltoll I I I ~ I I C ~ L I I I I ~ l l~e N c c l ~ i ~ i ~ t S u p c ~ I3axaat lo bc more consistent (0 33) thnti
I<cj;,~~tI~lil; o l invc1111111c\ lo lolal asset\ the selected umts of Rayiliaseema
~ I I I I I I I ~ llle slttdy pcilotl vnrlctl liotn 20 94 pcr cent to 31 86 per cent The
ilVCl;lgC t;lllo t c#~s le~e t l 111 M:~I)I;I~~I:I was 31 99 per cent. In Balajt 39 84 pel cent,
In ICiltIIlitl 36 48 IICI C C I ~ ~ , III AIIIUI~III)UI 16 97 pel cent, a id 111 Proddatu~ 15 55
Ilcl cctlt Rcgartl~tlfi collslstelicy in ltlvestlnent the Baln~l Silper Bazaat
t ~ l ~ ~ ~ i t t n ~ n c ~ l ;I cotlsislc~~cy o r 0 10 111 pro poi trot^ to total assets In the othel supel
billnnts 111 (lie leg1011 the co-cfiicrellt of vat~atlon was tltgher.
It1 llle s;iinple ui~rts of tlie coastal legroll the average tatlo of Inventones to
total sssets varied from 25 91 per ceiit to 39 72 per cetlt. The nverage rnttus
registered were 17.61 per cellt m Kalapav~l l~, 4272 pel cent ln ~rtkakulatn, m
l l ~ e VSP 59 09 per cent, 25.03 per cent in Visakhapatnam, and 18 06 pel cent111
the Ongole Supw B;lznar h d the co-efficient of vannaon shows that the O W l e
Supu IHa/llal ll;ld Its lllvcsllllel~t 111 lllvclltoiles cons~sklltly (0 11) plopol.tlon
to total as?cl\ 1111d t l l ~ o l l l~ l l l l l l l F followed it - Kalpaval11 (0 LI), Vlsnlihapaham
(O 17)- S~~knkl l la ln (0 18) illld VSP (0 27), 111 thi~t oldel
111 1 clc1lg;lllcl lilt RVCIIIgC I11IIl) IllveIllOlieS to total assets of the
. ; I I~CI I I ,~ /~I , I I . ; va11ctl htt\vccn I8 73 pel cent alld 29 74 pel cellt w~th m~ avelagc
of 24 I ? 11cl ccllt ,lllll il LOllslStC111 L O - C ~ ~ ~ C I E I I L of VnllntlOll (0 16) 111 rnanagillg
~ a t i o 'I l1e11 nveliigc iallos wele - 14 95 p e ~ cent in Kmadlieau, 24 86 pcr cent
I I I AIIJIIIII S I I ~ C I I ~ ~ I / : I z I I , 35 09 ce1111llNeelng111, 12 01 pel cclrt lnK;llpalatl~a,
I I I I ~ 1 3 71 11c1 cent III AtldlsBn W I I ~ tegaltl to consistency in the latio 4tlarshn
Sulic~ I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I ~ I ~ I I COI IYISICI I~ IY (023) wll~le Kflmndi~e~~u tlld not
I I I ~ I I I I ~ : ~ I I ~ I I , 11s LII-CIITCICII~ ol 'vfl~~nt~nn stn~ldit~g a t0 56 [luiltlp the stti(Iy pellad
111 I<ay,~l;lrecl~ii~ I I I ZIII 111c five nape1 bazaars the ~nvenlosy const~(uted on
:~vcl;~gc 40 p c ~ ccl~t of ~ I I C I I curtent assets They all sliow conststwlcy 111
I I I ~ I I I ~ ~ I I I L : I ~ I C I I I ~ I ( I , whose cu-erfic~ca of vnriat~o~l stood at 0 10
A5 St11 tllc avctegcs oS latto, Mamatha ~eglste~ed 43 80 pol cc~it, Balali 65 19 per
cent, 1<11tllu11, 59 13, Anaotnpu~, 36 19 pel cent, nr~d P~oddatu~ 25 27 per cent,
1l1e11 avcrngc becilg l(j 04 pet cent rlullng the study Thus, the co-effic~ent of
Vnlliltloll m the latlo of ll1ve)itolies to cunellt assets was lowest m Ba111~1 atld,
Allflntapur, Kildhiri, h.f~natlla sad Prodtlatur units followcd it in that ordel In this
regru tl
In tllc Coastal legion the K~lpavalli, Snkaklllml and the VSP super
h n m a ~ s I ~ a d Inore than 50 per oent of their ourrent assets In mventol'Y, whvhlie the
V~sakl~np:ltna~~l ('15 39 llcl cent) :mtl 011gole Super Bazaals ]lad only half of it
(25 09 pel ccllt) J'hc co-etliclenl of varliit~oll of the ratlo shows conslstellcy
111 I I I ~ L I I ~ I ~ I I I ~ lllc IIlVC5t1II~ilL 111 IIIVClltOlles In plopo!lro~~ to cu l~e~l t assets On tJle
WIIOIC, ill1 lllc \a1111!1e ~ l t l l l % WCIC LOnFIstellt ~ U I I I I ~ lllc pet~od of stlldy
I Ilc 5alnple su11c1 b:~i.ail~s ~n 'lelnl~gama had atr aveiage 20 to 40 pel cent
ol I I I ~ ~ I I ~ O : I ~ \ 111 cullelit a w l 5 'V!e avelages of ]atlo were 27 26 per cellt 111
I<ami~dl~cl~u, 37 04 l!cl cenl 111 Alljanl, 45 32 In Neclagr~r, 17 87 pel cent m
ICall!nl;1111;1 dl111 5 1 4') p c ~ cc~il Atlil~rlla
I 11c A I I ~ ~ I I I I Supe~ B a ~ a n ~ wils inolc cot~s~stent a1 managlng tile latlo than
l l~c ol11c1 +u11c1 baraals i~ntl IIS co-etliclcnt of vatlatlon stood at 0 21
'171~ lnvclllrrly luillove~ r1llia of'tbe selectetl super bazaals ~n Rayalaseema
fl~icto~~lctl 1111 , ~ v e ~ n g c bclwecn 0 61 t~lnes and 14.63 tlmes, w ~ t h conslstetlcy m
thc 1al111 'l'llc ilvc~i~gc liltlo ol ~~id~vldua l supel bazaars registe~ed wns fbul~d to
hc 12 OX lllncr 111 Manlntha, I? 16 li111es III Bnlajl, 10 36 t ~ ~ n e s in Kadhirl, 1027
t1111es 111 Al~i~nlnl~or nlltl 14 49 tlrnes 111 Pioddatu~ And the Bala~r Supel Bazaa~
wos conslrlcnl in 111vei11o1.y tulllovel latlo bene~ than the otlre~s, aid its CV stood
al 0 10 It ~cvcnls cffic~ent management of mventory.
In Lllc Coastal regior~ the avelage inventory turnover ratlo 111 the sample
lltllts s l~g l~ t ly fluctuatetl bc&$een 10 31 ttme and 12 38 tlmes, wth consistency In
tatlo, and tile co-effieent of varlatrarl was 0.05. hdimdudly, tile average
ratlo in K:klpavnl]i was 8.80 times, rn Srikakulam 11 92 t~mes, in the VSP 11 09
tlrncs, 111 Vlsnkh:lpatrlanl 10.88 tunes and in Ongole 14 37 times dulmg h e shldy
liellod IIegc~ldlllg C O ~ I S I \ ~ C I ~ C ~ 111 inatntatn~ng tlie ratlo ~ ~ l ~ ~ ~ ~ l l ~ was
~ncoos~r lc~ l t (0 (12) dlld 01igoIc SUPCI Uazaa~ wus consistent, its co-efficlellt of
vat~il!~oii 5ldild1111: $11 0 14. illid ~ I l l ~ l llnlts followed it V ~ s a k h a ~ ~ ~ ~ i m (0 15). and
Sl~kilk~il:ti~i. I I I C VSI' I1 22) I I I 1111s 01(1ct
lltc , ~ v c i ~ u ~ c i~lvclilrrly ti~~iiovcl lnllo 111 tlle selected supei bazaars of
'I C ~ ~ I I I ~ ~ I I I ~ I I I U L I I I ~ I ~ C ~ I I I C ~ \ V C C I I I0 K4 tiliies ant1 11 04 tlmes wlth consistency ~n
tile I;IIIO, , I I I ~ lilt LO-cllicicnt oI"vi1lialioi1 stood at 0 17
I lie iivcl , ~ g c ititin ~ c g ~ $ t c ~ c t l by iiitlnidual sapel bazaars was16 10 tlmes in
1<~1iiii1dl1c1111, I 1 7 4 I I I I I C ~ 111 A I I I ~ I ~ I . I6 08 tllnes 111 Neelagiti, 1626 tlmes in
l i \ c ~ l l r i ~ l ~ ~ ~ l ~ ~ ~ . , I I I ~ 10 711 1 1 1 1 1 ~ 111 Atlat~ha tluilng the pel~od of stutiy The co-
cl l ic ic~~t t r l v i~~ii~t ioi l S I I O W S I I I C O I I S I S ~ ~ I ~ C ~ in Neelagill In maIiaglllg tliis iat~o
(0 70), llui lllc rilllc~? colisiatcllcy ml~~ntn~netl Kalpnlntha (0 19) followed by
ICa~ii;itll~cii~~, A I I ~ I J I I I ~ I (0 10) iilltl Atlillsl~n (0 32) 111 tlus orde~
I'luc ~tcilrl\ 111 ii~vcilto~y n1ut1 sales vollime in ~ l l the selected supei bazaais
of Ilt~yi~liieccitla ~ c ~ o i t l c t l a glowiilg [lent1 in all tlie years of ~l le study pe~iad
cxccl)t 1997-08 find 1098.9') l'llat tlieie was ~d le investment in inventoues ul
lilctn 1s showii by t l ~ c bnlances of inveiitoly wh~ch varled from Rs 31 93 lnkhs to
Its 75 34 lakllr .sllc giowtll late m the sales volume also varied, from a Poslkve
Glowif1 late of 33 56 per cellt to a iiegotive late of 16.25 percent
Thc correlrt~olu value sliows that there was a strong relation between
viilinbles v i z , inve~itory find sales in the selected super bazaars. The t-value
poq~l~vc ~.llc 01 I X 88 Ilci ~ C l l l r1111l il tlcgiltlve u f I l I4 per cent The lecotded
g~owtli 1;11c I I I lllc s'1lc5 vr!lulnc of lilt salnplc supel bazaars vmed between 158
pel cent I I I I ~ I 1') I'J ~ I C I L C I I ~
lllc t-v,~luc (4 (1x2) sllow; that ll~eie was a slgn~ficmt ~elat~ollsh~p
Ircl\vco~~ I I I V C I I ~ I I I ~ : I I I ~ ~ ~ I I I C S V O I I I I I I C nl 5 pel cent level of s~gnlficance 111 the
legloa Illc IIIIC,II ]cl:leaalil!l crllltillon lnaltes it clea~ that one mut change In
111 I C ~ I I I I ~ ~ I I I ~ I I I I C g10wt11 liltcs I I I ~nvento~y ant1 sales volume In all the
selc~tetl S ~ I ~ I C I II:I/:II~IF I U C O ~ ~ C ~ I gc~~elally a posltlve trend In aU the yeals of the
6latly c x ~ e p t 1997-08, 1998.09 ; I I I ~ 1999-2000 The balances of ulvetltoly vmed
ffoln Its 17 09 111kl1s to l<s10 17 li~khs and tile sales volume valed between
Rs 213 86 11ikl1~ arltl Rs 482 67 Irktls. TIlc cot~elatlo~l value reveals a weak
l c l n t ~ o ~ ~ s l ~ l p bctwccll tlic vaitoblcs vrz, lnve~ltory a11d sales. Tlle t-value (I 832)
of the lnventoly ;ll,tl sales sllows that thele was no slgnlficant ~elat~onship
between both llie varlnbfes at 5 per cent level of s~gruficaice m the leglon
Tuu~ilng to assessing tile overall workrng callltal management of tile super
bnznilrs 1s the t ]u~c lei3jolls of llle state, by means of different financing latlos
ilntl I I I I I ~ ~ ~ t l i l l ~ ~ l i , I t 15 fOllllil lllat tilt avelngc mvestment lnatle In culTel1t
;~\ict$ clr~tlng tllc 1)cllotl 01 ilutiy by tile selected super bmaa~s 111
v a ~ ~ c t l 1)ctwccll Ri 12 ?2 I ;~kl~i III IL~LlI-92 and Rs 31 03 lakhs 111 2000-01 ~h~
,Ivcl.lgc I I I V ~ ~ I I I I C I I ~ in Lllllelll iIS(et5 leglste~ed hy ~ n d ~ v ~ d u a l milts was in tills
I ~ I ~ ~ I I ~ I I I I < \ 21 20 Iclhlli In Mu~~liithzl. RS 35 64 lnklis 111 Balqi, Rs 3 63 lakhs in
I < I I ~ I I I I I I , I < \ '30 47 Ii1kl15 I I I AI IEI I I~I I~I~I I I I I I ~ I I4 72 I&hs 111 P10ddab1 The I<a(lh111
Su11c1 I~II/:I:II I I I I I I I I ~ B I I I C ~ I conslsleilcy IB the maltltenance of c~lnent assets bette~
111rlr1 llic c~tlicr 51i11cr bii/ildrh ~n lllc luglurl, 11s ctl-efficient of vauabon standing at
0 l(l
~ ~ L ; I ; I I ! , ol tllc I'o;lsi;ll I C ~ I ~ I I woi III tl115 I I I ~ I I I I ~ I Rs 24 80 lakhs in I<alpavalh,
Ila 16 67 lilkhs in S ~ ~ k n k ~ ~ l a ~ n , Rs 62 76 lakhs III the VSP, Rs 144 83 lnkhs in
V I S ; I ~ ~ ~ ; I ~ ; I L I I ; I I ~ , ,111~1 Rs 30 21 lakhs 111 Ongole
I < c ~ s ~ t l ~ l i g collslstcncy III milnuglng tile cunent assets V~sdthapatnatn
51111c1 I I ~ L ~ I I I I was ITIOIC CnIIsIstcIIi (co-efic~eilt of vatlance 0 09) than thc othc~s
I t wds lbllowctl by the Srrknkulnm, I<alpavf~IIi, Ongnlc, and VSP supei bazaas 111
l l~e 01 t l c ~
III 'I.cltu~goaa tI~e avclago c111le11t assets of the sample super bazaars vaned
fioln Rs 13 73 I ~ k h s in 1991-92 to Rs 23.27 laklls In 2000-01, the average belng
IL 19 1 I lrklls Ullit-wlse, on nvetage Karnadhenu registe~ed Rs. 18 40 lakhs,
Anlam Rs 11, 30 ]akIls, Neelagiri Rs. 13 60 lakhs, Kalpalatha Rs 45 54 lakhs,
and Adatslln ~ 8 , 173 lakhs, The ca-efficient of varifltlon shows thnt be
Ncciaglll Sullvl H:I/:I;I~ i'f;l< ctI~lS1~lc11t 111 collholl~ng the Investnlenr of
assel7
I t I\ 111111111 Illill l l l ~ CIIIICII~ 1 8 1 1 ~ OF III~IVI~U~.~ sllper beaars did not
tlle 5tiIlltlilltl liltlo o f 2 1. i l l l t l l l l C clvclagc lavcstments 111 curieilt assets the
rsr~lj)lr UJ)ICJ [)il/rlill\ WCIC 111 I!IC I~IIIOWIII~ ~i18111rer M R I ~ ~ ~ I R ] 87 tjjnes, ~~l~~~~
1 48 ~IIII~\. I< r~r l l i r~ r 1 7 7 tlrllc\, AI~~III~~I~LII 1 16 tlrncs, and Ptoddatu~ 1 22 trines
'rlrc co-clticlcnt of v:ilf:lllon lcvcal.; lllat the Baid~l and Proddatur Supel Baznars
I~?II~I~IIIIIC(~ L O I I ~ I ~ I C I I ~ ~
111 lllc ('o;r\lirI IC~~IOII solvei~cy Ilosltlon of all the sallrple supel bazaars
i v i r i L V C I I ~ cuccl)l l l ~ c Ongoic supcl bi~zi~iir As Lor tile nveiage latro Kalpnvall~
~cco~tlci l I OX Irii~cu, SII~~I~I~~~IIII I 42 tl i l ies, the VSP 1 37 ~IIII~S, Vlsakhapatnam
1 22 IIIII~$. :lrltl Orlgole rcglstcretl 2 25 times However in conhollmg the laho
KIIII)IIV:~III wi~s IIIOI~ coesrsrcnt illan l l le othw super baznars, its co-effic~ent of
villr;lLlIlll \l;llllllil~ ,I1 0 06
'I'llc cur~cnl tatlo of Lllc salnple urrits in Tela~gana regstered o fluctuahng
tlelltl , w111cl1 sllowq n pool solva~cy posltlar~ The avaage la110 legrsteled ln
Kamatlhclw was 1 46 tlmcn, 111 AIIJ~III 2 77 times, In Neelaglrl 2 84 times, m
Kalpalnthil I 25 lfrnes i ir l t l a 111gl1 latlo of 10 14 times In A h h a The
efficlct~t of vatln1jon shows ~nconsrslency in con@ollmg the raf~o In Adarshn
slipel baznsr, its co.eficient of vanonoe stantllng at 1.16 during the period of
sllldy
I h~ 11(11111I l i l l l i l 01 1 1 1 ~ ' S C I C L I C ~ 'illllCl ~ I B % ~ ~ I S 111 the Rayaiaseema leglo"
leco~tlcrl ;I i l u ~ l u a l l l l ~ llclltl thlo~lglli)ot the peilod or shldy The avelage latlas
I C C O I I I C ~ I I I I ~ I C S1111CI [)cllll015 lilll 11111\ Manlatlin I 0 0 tunes, Balil~l 0 5 0 tlInes
I w i 1 i 1 l l l l l 1 66 t ~ n 111 the Ananlaplit and ploddatul
$1117~1 I I . I / ~ I : ~ I ~ 1 1 1 ~ illlliid~ty 1)051t1~)11 Wrl5 \ve,ik dlld tile avelage railos recolded by
ll~clri w c ~ c 0 74 l l f l l c~ : I I I I ~ 0 'J I lil11c5 lesl~ectlvely However, the Manatlla Slipel
Baz;~;lr W ~ I S CUIISIS~CI I I 111 ~ i ~ l l t l ~ ~ l l l l g llle liltlo better thm the other supel bazaas
Ill lllc lCg1"ll
111c 11(l111il1ty 1ro\111~r11 of llie sillnple sllpel bazaals in the Constal legion
t lu~ i i~g I I I C pc~icltl irl stl~tly WIIS 1101 111) lo lilt ~t,2titlards The Ongole Snpel BUZ,R~I
lhirwcvc~ w.15 ;In c\ccplnrn, 115 irvc~dgc oI' IIIC ratlo ben~g 1 68 tllnes However,
K I I I I V I I I I wi~s CIIIISISICIII (CO-CII~CICIII of vurallce 008) III cniit~oll~ng the
Ilioi~gli 115 Ili1111i11ty ]IOSIII(III WIIS w ~ a k
I Ilc .ivc~;lge 1rqt11il 1111111 111 IIIC selected untts of Telangana shows a shollg
Ilqii~(l~ly I I O \ I ~ I ( I I I I I I~I IVI~U~IIY, Kaninrlllenu ~eco~derl an avelage laho of 106
tlmcs, AIIJ~~I I I 1 75 tlli~cs, Ncclng1111.62 tlmes, Kalpnlatl~al 03 tlmes, md
Atia~sli;~ 5 02 LIIIICS 'I'lic i \d~ lsha Super Bnzaar was lncons~stent (CVI 53) UI
co t~ t lo l l~~ig the intlo, but Kalpalatl~a was more co~~slste~lt than the othe1 sample
super bazni~rs in tile icyloi~
'rlic nvcraye ratio of currmlt asset to total assets ul the smple umts of
R~yrlascctna varied tl~~ougllout the per~od of study wltl~ more cons~stency m the
tatto I ~ l r l l - w t ~ c lllc Ilvcltlgc t ~ l l l o lcglclclcd w;la 6945 ltcl cent ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f i ~ ,
61 112 11Ct ~ C t l l Ill I~clI1111, (2 20 IIPI LCttt I11 KR~IIIII, 45 93 ~ C I cent In ~ lan~p lv
allti 61 5 3 11" ~w"Lt1 ~ ' l (~ l~d l l ( t l l dlltttlg the ~ lc l lod of studY Tile co-efficlctlt of
valtettoll \III)W\ l l l i t l 1111: I{:l1:111 d11d I\III~I~~~I~)L~I Silpet Baznals mole coilslstent
ih;~tl l l ~ e othct\. ;~ t l t i tltclt ( ' V slootl .II O 00
I hc I~I~III o l , ivc l ,~~c LIIIICII~ cl\scts to totill assets In the selccled supet
btlzne~r o l tlie ('trltcl:~l lcgtotl villlerl Ltotn 51 93 per cent to 68 99 pel cent d u n g
1i1c study [)elloll '1 ilc t l l l l l ~ c 111 tllc llltllvltlunl lltilts ~ecotded a fluchlat~ng bend
'l'ltc ,IVCI;I~:~\ ICLOI(ICII 11y l l l ~ t l t :IIC $15 lollows 3432 pet cent 111 ICalpavalll,
73 KO pet ~ c t l l In Stlhd/~llkltll, 77115 [ICI cent 111 tile VSP, 55 08 pel ccnt m
Vlsnltlt:~l)alti~~tti 11ncl 72 1.1 pet ccnl ltr Ongole 'The co-effic~e~lt o f vnllet~or~ shows
cotts~slcn~y 111 II~~IIII~IIIIIIII~ LIIC III~III, l l ~ e Onpole super bazaat 1s collsistetlt (CV
0 03) ;rtttl i t t i lo l lo~vctl Iry K;tlp;~v:~llt (0 09), S~rkakulnm a11d Vtsnkhapnmam
(0 I?.), ;ttl(l VSI' (0 16)
'1 (11: 1iiL10s of i lvc~iigc clltletlt assets to total assets taho 111 the salnple super
bt~z;lnr~ n l 'I el~wgan;~ wclc 58 9') pei cent, 6651 pet cent, 77 45 pet cent, 67 13
pel ccnl nntl 65 61 per cent in KrunadCetiu, An~an~, Neel~gm, Kalpalatlla, and
Atlol.slln super bitzanrs tespect~vely durlng the shldy pellod Tlle co-effictent of
valtatlon rangeti betwcell o 03 alld 0 50 111 all the five super bazaa~s These
values reveal consistency In tile management of the tatto UI the units except 111
the Kn l~ lndhe l ,~ Sllper BnznU, whmh d ~ d ,lot collslstentl~ manage the ratlo, its
CV stsntllng O 50
I Ilc :iVcl:lge CIIIICIII assets lo fixed assets ratlo in the selected supel
l~a!;~;lls It1 I~~ly: l l : l~~cl l l i l V ~ I I C ~ fioln 3 60 tllileb to 523 tmies The un2 t .w~~~
;~vclngc l:lLloj l e~o l t l e t l wclC Ill Lhe following m m e r Marnatl~a 4 22 hmes,
rjel;ill 1 07 Iitnc<, klt(lli~ll 5 3 1 tlliie?, Allantaplit 6 69 t~lnes and Proddntur 2 77
[llncq I tic A~i . t~~ t i i [~ l i i SIII)CI Llaz~ial was colislstcnt 111 conboll111g the tiltlo benet
I lie c u ~ t c l l t osscl? to fixctl assets iatlo in the selected ur~its of Coastal
icgloli iccoltlctl a l luc lu ;~ t i~~g iiend lliiouglioi~t the petiotl of study The nveiage
latlo tccoltlctl I I I K i~ l l~avn l l~ w;~? 0 97 Limes, in Srikak~ilaln 6 95 tlmes, in the VSP
5 20 ilnic\. I I I V ~ \ , ~ l t l ~ , ~ p ; ~ l n ~ i ~ i i 1 49 LIIIICS atld 111 Ongole 3 16 times Fuitliel the
'IVCI~I[:C ~iiiio', I I I ~ I L ~ I I C Lliat S ~ i k ~ ~ k ~ i l a i n liatl sountl 11qu1dlty pos~t~on, followed 111
llils ieg;iitl by llic VSI1, 011yole. Vlsaltl~apntoam and l<alpa~all~ And also
S~~kal ,~i l ; l ln W;I\ co~~$i.; tei~t 111 c o n ~ o l l ~ ~ i g the i a t~o better than the othe~ sample
lIlllLS
I llc avelngc ctlllcnt assets to fixed assets raho UI the selected supei
baznai\ ol i cli~~lg:m;l vaiictl fioln 30 77 [lines 111 1993-94 to 47 22 tunes In 2000-
01 'Ilic ;Ivclaye lntlo lecoidcd was 196 93 tlmes in Adasha, 7 79 times m
b l p a l a t h ; ~ . (I 8 I tilncs in K~madheliu, 3.80 tiines 111 Neelagn~, and 2 17 times in
Anja~u duling thc stody. However, Neelagtn was oons~stent 111 mnnag~ng the
Inlio, followed by Kalpalatha, Adarslia, Anjani and Kamadllenu 111 that nrdel
Ailtl A(larslln ]la([ a liquidity posltlon better than that ofthe other supel kizflus
I'IIc ,~VclLlk!c Ll l l lC l i l fI\YCI? LLIIIIOVCI ratlo III the s;unple supel bazaius of
R~y;ll;i\CClll~l v:lllcll iloln 4 70 tlrnes to 5 83 hlnes a11t1 thne was a consistency
tile avctcigc tdllcr l l l l l ln~ llle rtlldy llellod The unit-wlse stutly leve~led that the
avcl;igc t ;~tto 111 M , I I I I C \ ~ ~ ~ I Wd\ 4 51 IltllCr. 111 Ralaj1 8 62 htnes, in Kadhttl 6 40
I ~ I I I C S . 111 Aii;i111:111111 3 '11 t i l t l ~ \ iltid 111 P~odrlatm 3 24 tunes du~irig the study
l~citorl I i 15 cvttlclli irOll1 lilcll ilvClclgC tU[ooVCl latios Bala~i hnd alughtumovei
of citiic~il ;IN%? ;in11 It Wt19 followetl by Kndhll~, Mamatha, hiantapur and
I'tod~l,~ii~i I I I ll~itt O I ~ I C I I:III ( IICI, tile co-effic~ent of vatiatlon shows c o ~ ~ s l s t c ~ ~ c y
I I I llic lidldlt S O ~ I C I Hiilai~i 111 co11tio111i1g tlie ln t~o liettei tllan the o t l ~ e ~ sainnple
lllul\
'I hc ;ivcid&c L I ~ I I C I I ~ i i s s~ t \ li1111ovel tatlo 111 tlie sample units of the Coastal
~cgtoil v;i~tctl trclwcc~i 5 29 ant1 6 41 tltnes w1t11 an average of 5 90 tuner wllh
L I I I I Y I S ~ ~ I I C ~ I IIC ~ I V C I I I ~ C 111t10 OF tnd~v~tlunl 1111its showed that it was 4 63 ttmes
111 K;IIIIIIV:IIII, 7 22 illnes in S i i k ~ k ~ d a m , 8 63 tlines in the VSP, 5 21 tltnes in
V t r a k I i r i ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ t i i ~ ~ IIIIII 1 7 0 times In Ongole duting the penod of shidy The
V~s;iklinl~;i~i~;rt~i super ba/~lal tnn~ntaued a consistency ratto bettel than the 0 t h
supct l~;va;irs, j t s co-efficient o f vanonce standing at 0 14
'I.ltc ;Ivcritgc ~ , t t ~ e r i t assets hllnover latin In the sample SilPer bmaars of
Tclnag;ina viuicd l)etwcen 3.24 tlrnes and 6 92 times As for the UnIt-wlse
avelage ratio registeied, was 4 15 times m Kamadhenu, 4.00 hmes m An~anl,
6 29 timcs ln Neclllg,ri, 2 81 times in Kalpalnthn, 5 31 tunes u1
'l'llc ,1vc111gc Wol king cilplkll trrlliove~ tiltlo of t11c sample supel bazaas
Kay~lrl~celrln I~rglily lluchl~~lcd t l ~ ~ n l i g l ~ o t ~ t the perrod of study, varylug \=been
13 28 tlitic$ iilltl 101 07 t1111C5 A5 f 0 1 tile ~ndivldual avelage ratlo in Mnlllatha
wi15 I I 0 I ilnlc$. 111 11~11iil1 I t Wcli 27 0 2 (~~IIeS, 111 Kadllrir 9 38 hmes, III Atlantapur
3 Z I I I I ' I J I ! : ~ ~ I 2 07 L I I S The avoage ratlo tlep~cts ll~at the
A I I ~ I I I ~ ~ I ~ L I I ' I I I~ ICI [ I C I / ~ ~ I I ilild il lllglt tr~lllovc~ ol net wolk~ng capital dutmg Ltle
~pcliotl of ~ l u d y ill111 it Wilb lo i lo~e t l by Itlie B ~ I ~ J I , Praddatu, Mnlnrltl~a and
I I I I I I I I : I S AIIIIII~:I~IUI llatl a co-efficient of varlatroll hlgller than that
n f lllc olllct vllpcl ~ l i l l i i i i l 5 It S~IOWS [OW COllSlStenCy In controll~ng tile ratlo
dulrng Lhc pcilatl of 5totly A11t1 Llaialt was lnole cor1nste11t ~n cottholllng the
latlcl thsn tllc cilhcl!,
I'llc worklug capilai illlnovct atl lo III the sample supel bulzaats of the
Co;icf:iI ICI;IOII ~ ~ ~ : t ~ i t i c i ~ i ~ t l y varlcd tlullsg tile silrtly perm! Tlie avelage ~iir~t-
WISC tatlo 111 tile legloo showcd \ha\ 111 Kalp~~vnlli ~t wos 68 98 tlmes, 111
Slikakulirln 27 73 ii~~ic'i , in llle VSI' 46 97 tlrnes, 111 VlsRkhnpatnam 100 53 tl~nes
lilttl 111 O n f i o l ~ 6 05 t inle~ 'I'hc co-cffiolent of v~rration shows that Ongole (CV
0 09) had coclslslclmy belter tllilrl the otller lu11ts In controlhg the tuulovel ~a t ro
'l'hc w o ~ k t n g capital turnover m t ~ o m the samplc un~ts of Teliingana
moderately vnrletl The averagc inito in the legton vnrled between 6 62 t~mes In
1991-92 ~ t l d 23 77 tunes 111 1998-99 wltl~ an average of 11 79 times The average
lnllo of Kalpalatlla sl~owcd a lllgl~ and favourable turnover of netwolkmg
and rt was follr~wctl by Kamadl~enu, Neelagti, A d a h and h ~ m l mths Order
11 IS ( I ~ Y C I V C L I hlllll ( 1 1 ~ . ~ O - c l ~ i ~ l ~ t l ( of vnllalloli tllat Anjanl hat\ consistency in
C o t ~ l ~ ~ ~ l l i ~ ~ g 1110 till10 l l ~ t l ~ l lllllfl tile 0thc1 sarnllle units, ;uld 11s co.efticlcllt of
VnllarlLc ~lorltl :It 0 12
111 1llc fclc~cctl 111111f (11 i<iiyala5ccma tlle cul~ent assets legisteled both
~~osi l ivr wr l nrgcillvo I:IIIWIII l t t lus, v,ilyii~y between il poslllve rate of 45 32 per
I I I I l t I l V I : 1 1 I I l'ile siltne tlcnd is obseived in tile
volrlllic o l v ~ l c \ , which vil~tcd b a w c c t ~ a posittve rnte of 33 56 pel celrt in 1994.
05 to ,I ilcl:;rl~vc iaitc 111 16 25 pei cent 111 1998-99 From the ~esults of l 2 value
OO 25 1 1 1 ~ CCII I of v;~~lelicrtr W;IS iboi~rl 111 co~ lc i~ t assets and snles, ant1 tile t-value
(X 97.) \Iii~wctl 111;iI l l lc~c wns II sign~ti~tlti( llnpnct of sales 011 cuuents assets 81 I
I'hc vohimc ol cl~t tc~tc ns.;els n~ld sales in the selected supel bnzaius ortlte
('o;~sl:ll IC~:IOII v i t~~c t l I)C(WCCII R5 243 55 lakhs and Rs 334.65 lnkhs The sales
vl~lutllc 111 llic i c g ~ o o icgc.;tclctl a ylowlng nentl over the pevtous year's sales
[ l ~ t ~ ~ n g llrc I I C I I O C I of P I I I ~ Y nod t t v a ~ ~ e d fioin Rs 1251 49 lakhs to Rs 2028 43
1:tkhs 'l'lic csl~~rletctl ilnea~ reglesston equatlon sho~vs that t l ~ e ~ e was a
sigtlllica~ll cffcct of lilt sales on the current assets at 1 pet cent level of
a~l:l~llicnocc ]?lorn the ~csl,lts of i2, 80 80 per cent of variabon was found In
Cllllellt assets and sales
'file cutrcnt assets find snle balance of the imts in l'elnngana dllrlng the
1)crlod of s t~rdy m g e t l from Rs.66.66 l ~ k h s to Rs.116 34 lakbs, by teglstellng a
glowlag hencl, except in 1998.99 And the sales volume of the regton vaied
1>cl,lcc11 I < \ 213 811 i;lhll\ <111(l 1182 07 lakhq, leg~ste~ lng bath neg80ve
OOSIII~L! g l~ l cv t l l l t l tc \ OVcl llle IllCvIoos ycnl's sales volume T l ~ n t thele lvaY,ls a
algal l i~:rr l l IilllltILl (11 l l l C G~IICI 011 llle Lll l lel i t assets in the legion 4924 per cent
oi thc v,lll,ltlol1 111 ~ l l l l C l l l iI\sCI\ I\ C X P I R ~ I I ~ ~ by tile sales 2786 tile
LOIICI~I~II(~III~ I-v~IIIc. lvI11~I l I\ \ l& l l l l i ~ i l l l t ilt 5 pel cellt level o f s l g n ~ f i ~ ~ n ~ e
l l l c L,LIIICII~ II~IIIIIIICS III tl lc sn11111le S I I ~ ~ I b:lzaals of Rayalaseema
s ~ g l l ~ l i c : ~ n l l y v i l l led IIC~WCCII I<\ 49 48 lakbs and Rs 99 52 lnkhs l'he sales
volu111c III ll lc IC[:IOII s ~ g ~ ~ ~ l i ~ i ~ i ~ t l y l l lc~eased 111 all the yeas except d111111g 1998-
1)') 11 ~ , I I I C ~ l ~ c l w c c ~ ~ Rs 751 70 I~ILIIs t111t1 RS 809 78 lnkhs But 111 1998-99 Ule
c:ilcs (ICLIC~I~ICII 111 10 25 [lei LCI~I OVCI the prcvlous ycal's sales The eshmnted
IIIIC;II IL!~IC\\I~III C(~II,I~I~II~ III(IIC;I~CI Illat lllcre was n siglrlficant effect o f tile sales
OII L~IC L ~ I I I ~ I I ~ II:I~II~IIIC\ I t IS CIC~II L a m Ibc ~ ~ - v a l i ~ e , that 73 22 per cent of Ule
v~l l lc l l l l ) l l I11 I~IC LIIIICII~ I~dI i l l i t le\ IS e~p la l l l cd by the sales One urnt o f change 111
5nlc g ~ v c \ 0 0 0 IIIIIOIIII~ 01 C~I~III~C 111 cunelit i lab~lr t~es l'he conesponda~g t-
vc1111e 4 067, rvirs s ~ g n t f i c ~ ~ l ~ t ; ~ t I ~ICI c c i ~ t level
(:IIIICIII l ~ n b ~ l t l t c s 111 (Ire snelgie supcl bazaars o f tllc Constal legion va led
horn i t s I 5 7 18 lakhs to Rs 281 15 lak l~s l'he sales volutne in the reglon
~ e y l s t c ~ c t l ;I gtowrr ig t ~ c n ~ l ovel the prev~ous yeal's sales d1u111g the penad af
slurly, v l ny lng fro111 1251 49 lokhs i n 1991-92 to 202843 lakhs ln ~ 0 0 0 4 ' 'i''he
estllnetctl I I I I~~~ legtcsslon equictlon strows that there was a slgtuficmtrnpactof
Llle sales 011 ti le culrent liobilitles in the region. The *.value shows that 8227
pel cc~l t ol vi~lldllOll 111 tile CLlllCllt l l l ibllltle~ IS explalnetl by the sales 6 092
gives tile ICII)CL~IVC (-~illll~, W~ILII I S ~ l~ l l l f i c l l l l t at I pet cent level
l l ic ~IIII~II~ Ilnb~l~tlcs 111 tlie selected supel bazanrs of ~~l~~~~~
~ ~ , l ~ d c ~ a l c l y vdllctl 11~1111 1K%4[) 45 ialklls In 1911-92 to Rs 85 00 lakhs 11, 2000.01
/\tltl rllc r.11~5 vir l~~mc r r l l l lu IC~IOII vf~rled bel~vcett Rs213 86 Inklls and 482 67
I , I 1cy15tc1111g Ilolll ~lcgal~vc alid posltlve growth lntes Tllele was a
s i g ~ ~ ~ l i c ~ ~ ~ ~ t cllcct or ~IIC sillcs 011 the cutlent Ilabtlltles 'The 6 1 94 per cent
V;III,I~I~II 111 lhc LIIIICII~ l ~ a b ~ l ~ t ~ e ~ IS expl~lllcd by the sales One llnrt cliange III
~;llcs 1cr111l\ III O I I ;Ilnoulll or cllallge III cllllellt I~alr~l~t~es The collespond~ng t-
VIIIIIC ( 3 OOX) IS s l g ~ ~ l l i ~ , ~ n t ill I 11c1 LCII~ level
I'l~i, r l c l wc11h111g ci~p~lnl 111 tllc selected supel bazaas of Rayalasccma
Ilucl~~nlctl l~clweur~ KF 12 10 lnklls ilttrl Rs55 65 ldfl~s, ~cg is te~~~ lg a mixed
g1owl11 1,11c 111 lilt S I I I ~ ~ pc~lol l '[hc sales volllme In die regloti bad an lllclciislng
Ilcllcl csccpl 111 1998-99 VIOIII the estlrnatcd llrieiu regresston equatlon it is clear
tllill t l lc~c WII? 81 s~p~~~ f i ca l i t llnpact o f tllc sales on the net working cnp~tal 111 the
~cg to~ l ~ I I I~ IIIC Y~I IC of I' S~IOWS that 91 63 pa cent o f vmat~on m the worklng
cal)ltill 19 ex],li~~nctl tllo sales. 9,359 glve tile respective t-value, wlltch Is
hlgllly ilglllficnr~t a l I per c e ~ ~ t level.
'[.he sales worklrtg cap11a1 In the Coashi regloll satnple lllllts
allglitly va~lcd Tile net working capital va~~ed between Rs 44 79 l u l s and
Rs 92 73 I;tkhs by ,cgrstering a ln~xed growth rate The sales volufl1e the
legloti va~l~ctl f ~ o m 1251.49 lnklls m 1991.92 to 2028 43 l k l l 3 in 2°00-01 it Is
,l[15c~vcll ~111111 I l lC ~\ l l l l l i l t~d 1111~:ll leylcsslon equatloll that ,here nos a
e,lgnifi~;lnt tlc~lc;lililg Ilcgil(1Vc effect of llle sales on tllc worltlllg capital tile 2
legirrn I llc V I I ~ I I ~ tlt 1 i l l 0 ~ 5 lllflt 54 78 [)el Cellt of vallatlo~l m the worklng
c w l ~ ~ t t ~ l I \ c\l~l.ill~ctl IIY lilt ?ale\ i ' l~c co~iesponti~~~g t-value 1s 3 113, which
y ~ g l ~ ~ l i ~ i i ~ i l .11 5 I I C I ~ c n l Icvcl
I hc wr11lt111~, ~~ll) l Ial 111 liie 5i111111lc supel bazaais of Telangruia iallged
I I ~ I I I I I < $ 28 2 1 Ialtll\ lo Its 40 82 lnklls tillllng the peltod of study And the sdes
vol i i l~~c of llic ]ci:itrli vi~iictl bclwcm~ Its213 86 lakl~s in 1991-92 arid 18267
I I I I I I t 15 clcili 11o11l tile csillnnted lrncar reglesslon equat~on tk~at
lilc~c W;I\ 1111 s ~ l : i ~ ~ f i ~ a ~ ~ l ~ 1 1 ~ ~ 1 of tile sales on tlie wo~ki~lg capital III the legloll
llic v,ll~ic 01 I ' \Ilow$ tI1i11 1) 81 pel ccnl of valllit~on in the wolklng capllal is
cnl~lii~~rctl by l l ~ c siilci 0 255 gives lllc co~~espondlng t-value, whlch is not
s i g i i ~ l i ~ i ~ i ~ l ill 5 [ICI C C I I ~ level
11 I \ w e l l - ~ I I ~ W I I tllnt the fullds now statement analys~s of a busmess 1s an
C ( ~ G I I V C I ~ I C ~ I I I & lo as5c)b l l~e wily curlellt filnds nie employed It also gtves a
clcf~l 11lc101c ol 117 I ~ q ~ t i d ~ ~ y status In Rayalasee~na the Mmatha S11pe1 Bazaar
~ ~ ~ o b ~ l l \ c t l the lnalol 11a1t oF 11s funds from loans and bus~ness opelat~ol~s The
[Iloculemclil of la;lll vnrred from a high of 98.02 pet cent La a low of 19 76 per
cent C)ot of l l ~ c total geneinted funds, 25 to 95 pet cent were used to meet the
worklrlg cilf>l[nl llceds And tile lelnattung were uailsed fol the ~ Y m e n t of
govclilmcllt lilvcs,mellts, repayment of loans, pulchase of Investments, pulchase
of f u r ~ ~ i t u ~ e nlicl olliels assets.
I llc I~IIIIIII ~t~- I~ l lC~dt lV( ' S l l l l ~ l [ i d ~ B l l l I p ~ ~ ~ l l ~ e d tile o n ~ o l pat of fil,,ds
ll~tclllgll \ l l I ~ l l l c i ~ lIl l l: l i lt lOll [ l l l l l l lg ill1 the YCalS except in 1997-98, rind [Ile rest
I 1 1 t I 1 Ill11 [Illlllifi YCiit 97-9R, it llloblllsed fijllds ~ l o u & l
WOI~,III~: ~ i r l i~ t~ l l A III~IOI llilll 01 115 I l r lnl fr111il5 WBS clla~~i~elled 111to worklng
ci~l)lt i~l. ~cl).ry~)lclIl 01 Wl~vurlllllClll 10illl5, /)LIIC~I~IS~ orllluestments and pu~chns~
lt11ri11111c. IIII' ~ r l l l t l l l5 t i l~loi l t I ? ? I I)el CCl l t 111 1tsf1111tIs dmlng 1997-98
I llc K~IIIIIIII SII~ICI llil~i~ii~ IIIO~IIIZC~I IIIC III~~JOI pa~t o f its filntls tIuough
loall5 illrd \v~l~kl l l i : ~illlllil~, 11111~ il 'illltl1I illllnUllt o f flln(fs tfuough short tetm
cepttill IIIIIIII~ lllc l)c~itlt l 01 itutly Al l ol ih EIIIII~S were l~t i l~sed fox Lllc l~ulcllnse
111 IIVCIIIICII~, lul l l l lu~c. I111 lhc ]iiiylncllt of govelrl~nellt invest~neilts and
ICJ)~I~IIICII~ 111 O ~ ~ I C I 1c iC~i1 \ 11 I1i\I I'IIII~F III ~IISIII~SS opelations tluling all the ycats
x i 7 i\ntl tlils ELI~~CI l)i~/iltli ~~t i l i$et l the funds to inclease the voiume
111 115 w o ~ k i ~ ~ g ci1p1ti11
I l ~ e Anenla l i~~l Sulic~ Bi l~aai gene1 11tcd fiintls thiougll business opeiations,
~(IIIIIS, c;~p~tal e l ~ t l w o ~ krllg cnl)lial tlurlng Llle pc~iod of study Of its total filnds,
40 lo 65 pa co l t wn, ilscd to lepny tlle loans dur~ng 92-93, 96-97, 97-98, and
2000-01 0llllng 1994.95 imtl 1995-96 the 1111rt lost o tnnjol pait of its funds
tll10ugh 111 its business operntraiis
'Sllc Prodrlatl~l Supe~ Baznai mob~l~sed the gleater !Jafi of its filnds
th~otigl l business operations, I t varied iiotl l a hi811 of 99 70 per cent 1995-96 to
II low of. 28.15 per cent 1997-98 Ant! the temaimg funds Were llrocured
l h i o u g ~ ~ cnlrltal, loans, RII~ sale of investments and wopklng ca~ltal The
111 lilt ~ lh l f l a l ICglOll tile kftlpavalll Slipei Bazoa~ t~~ob~l i zed the
oi Its I I I I I ~ I ~ I l ~ i O I I ~ I I ~ O V C I I I I I I C I I ~ I O ~ I I ~ nil[[ otlte~ loatls U I ~ tile test wfis gellelated
I I ~ I I I llic wol hliij: ct1111ti1I All the f~ltitls wele ottltsed f o ~ tile paymetlt of
govcl~illlCllt illld O ( ~ I C I l ~ i l l l ~ , [ l l l l~l l i l~e of ptOpellleS, inveslmcnts, furaltt~ie, olller
;~siel:, arltl f o ~ lllc wo~killg cajlllnl iltlnng tlle pellod of study Moteovet t l~is
S I I ~ U I I ~ / I I : I I 511~111i1iod locscs ll11o11gI1 its busmess opeintlon duitiig nil the yeals
C Y C C ~ I I I I I 101)1-01 ,111d 2000-0 1
l llc Si1hill~1il81111 S ~ i l ~ e t U ~ L ~ I R I 1110~1tied ~ t s fiinds fiom its busltiess
~ I C I I ~ I O I I S I I I I I I - 0 7 9 to 2 0 0 0 Af~d the rest of the fiuids wele
t l l o ~ ~ l l ~ s c ~ l I I I I I ~ vnliorls so~itccs sech ns capital fioru tnetnbets and goveinloet~t,
l l l d l l ~ iltld ~ ( ~ i k ~ i l g ~ i t l ~ l t i l l rile total nv~llable futlds of the untts wete t~til~sed to
icl~ily lllc govctnmetlt lni~ils, p~~tcliese of investments, filrnitute and for the
p l o c u ~ c m c ~ ~ t of w o ~ k t t ~ g cnpltal And the stipel bazm lost some of its fwds In
bustncsa ollei;~(io~ls d u t ~ n g tltc rnlt~al years.
'J'ltc VSI' Super Baznai seculed ttle major pat of its filntls from bllsiness
opotnt~oss, wluch vaued betweell a hidl of 81 84 per cent and a steep low of
4 I8 p a cent, and tile I ~ I I I ~ I I I I I I I ~ fulids weie mobillsed though capital, loans,
sole of lllvestlnents ctc, The amtlable f i ~ ~ t d s of the super bazaar were used to
1c11,ly ~ l l c g o v r ~ l l ~ l l c ~ l l :ind otllcl I~ i i t lq . pi~ichn?e o f illvcstme1lts, pmchase of
f ~ l i ~ l l l u l c ;llltl 9lllllc wits ~~l i l l l l l~ I~( i Ill lo the wolklllg capllal
VI~,I~~I,I~':I~II:IIII ( '0-IIPCI~IIIVE SU~ICI Bazaa1 li iob~l~zed the better pa,[ of
luntls 110111 IIII\IIICI\ o~lcl~l l lOl l \ (lllllllg 1091-92, 1992-93 and 1998-99 10 2000.
0 1 111 l l lc IUIIII~IIIIII~: IICIIOII i l l l i ly I[ nLlta111ed f1111ds tl11011gIl IO~IIS, ~~~k~~~~
I I I I I I I I V I I ~ I I T'l~e total nvallable filncls of the supel haaar
w c ~ c 1111l1\ctl lo1 lllc 11ay11lcnt of loi1111, pnlcIli~?e of Investment and i"uln~tu~e etc
M u ~ c o v c ~ . 11 ;II$II loul WI~IC o l it$ lulitls III Its bus~neis ope~at~uns du~lng the years
11o1n l'Y)'I-O,l 10 lOlJ7-08
l llc I )111:i1lc Supc1 Ilil/ilnl ~ l ~ o b ~ l ~ s c t l the major palt of its funds t111uugh
1 1 1 1 1 I I I ~ I I I I I I~IIIIII~ 1'102-97 aboul 7278 per cent of the CIITI~S was
l i l~cu lc i l 1111ln rlio wr11 l.1111: c11111ldl 'I ilc sllpel bazna~ ullllzed all of ~ t s funds for
tllc ~I I IC~I , I \~ (11 IIIIIII~~II~ all11 to ~ l~c~c i l s c tlie work~ng cnp~tal Dutlng Llle yes1
I1lO[i-05 tllc \LIPCI l~ i~/ i~i i~ c~seti 67 I? per cent of funds for the pflymeut of loans
Anti i t ~ I I ~ I I O ~ L colnc o f ~ t c filntls t lul~ng the yea1 1998-99
In thc I'clcngi~l~n ~eg~on, the Katnatll~ena Super Bazaar obta~ned 8 liuge
illnollnt o l l i l~lr ls r l l ~o~ lg l i I~us~ness opelntlolls 111 nll the yenrs of the study Dulvlg
1995-06, It illso p roc~~ led some fillids thlough woihng capltnl in 1997-98, and
(hlougl~ lo;lns 1998-99 A I~RJOI. portion 01 its filnds were used to actlulre
wark~ng cllplta[ ~~t also lost some of its filnds In business npelatlous dull%
1997.98
1 1 /\llllll 1 1 1 H.i/a,l~ tllclbi~i5crl il ialge pait of its funds througll
o l ) c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i c i l i~c t l v l i l r r l~c lwccl l 1')')1-02 a ~ l t l 1096-97, and in 2000-01 B U ~ dlwmg
it l ~ ~ i ~ ~ i ~ l c ( ~ ~~llll(' f l l i l ( ~ s 1 ~ 1 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ o ~ l l l ~ Ill lcB7-98, niit~ In 1998-99 ant1 1999.2000
I I I I I ~ ~ 0 1 1 1 : ~ l l l l l A { : l l l i l lC I [lilll 115 fillllls WRS use11 to Increase wolklng
ciil)llill lillllli l ~ ~ l d l(.il wc l i I I ( C ~ t t l ( ) I I I C ~ ~ ~ ~ Y Z filtllltllle, Inveslments, properties
alitl lo ~ c j l ~ i y lhc IIIIIII\ I I~rwcvci. t l u l ~ i ~ g peilotl f i no 1977-98 to 1999-2000 die
sullct II~/;I:II 1051 iolnc i r l 11s luntl.; t l l~ougli it? bus~~~css opelat~ol~s
I hc Ncclal:i~ I Sullcl llil/i~i~l obta~~ietl collsiderable funds tluo~igli i t s
I ~ t ~ \ i i ~ c \ s o ~ ~ t ~ t , i I ~ t r t ~ ~ , (lu11i1g IIIC ~li lc ly l ~ e ~ i t ~ d But i n 1994-95 11 obtalned some
c1tp1111l lu11tl5 allti 10 IJIII~I~NC Investincnk tlu1111g the per~od of shidy I-Iowever,
11 iil5o IOSI SOIII~ 111 I(\ IUIIIIS LIIIOII~II its bi~s~iiess ol)e~atioi~s dt111ng 1994-95,
1006-97 IIIICI 1007-08
lilt K i ~ l l ~ i ~ l i ~ ~ h i ~ SIIIICI i3ilflnl got R 1118JOr part Of Its funds t~ii0Ugh Its
w01k111g C;I]II~I~ cllllulg tllc yeais 1994-95, nntl 1996-97 to 2000-01 But in
lernalntllg yc i i~s of tllc stutly period, i t obtniiied fui~ds through govelnrnel~t and
0tl1e1 l o ~ ~ n s I t coultl plocure funds fiom its busmess operahons only in 1991-92
111tt1 2000-01 ( 3 ~ tile totill funds ;I mfljor p n ~ t w u lost in tts bllslness opelations
r i u i ~ ~ l g 1992-93 lo 1999-2000 ~ u t in 2000-01 about 51 62 Per cent of futids
were used to purch~se ~nvestillents ~ n d tlie remaining was uhllsed fol the
purclrasc o f ~nvestments and to repay the 10811s of the government
I 1 1 ~ At1111 h i 1 Sllllcl l~t l / i l : l l l l l ~ b l ~ ~ ~ e ( ~ a lnajol pill.t of l t ~ fundS tluouyh
b~lslne\s 1qlc1~1lOli~ O I ~ ~ Y , ~ l l l ~ l l ~ i l l l ~ d fl01n an enviable iilgll of 97 7zpe, cent
1996-'J7 lo ,i I I I W ol 10 6h 1)Cl Lent 111 1993-94 A I I ~ dlomg 1993-94 about 6799
11" LCIII ~11111 111 2(1(11J-(II ill10111 4 5 26 per eelit of fillids were moblllsed tluUugll
V I I ~ I I 1 1 A llli1101 l l i l l l 111 l I 1 ~ totill filllds wtis clia~~nelled to inclease the
wa~Llll[: ~:illlI~11 full~l'l l ~ ~ l l l l f i t l l ~ 5111dy pcllod tIoweve~., ~ I I I I I I ~ 1993.94 find
20011-01 11 I , I I & ~ ~ I I I I O I I I ~ I wil5 I I S C ( ~ lo I ) I I I C ~ I ~ S C 111vest111ents And tlie lest of the
l ~ l l t l \ Wil\ ll\cll lo ~ ~ I l l ~ l l i l \ ~ Slllllltlll~
I lie ~ ~ h o v c ~ I I I I I I I I ~ I I ~ i ~ c ~ e l i t ol'tlle stody of the selected supel baraars of
llic llllcc ic1;lolir ol Alltlll~a I'~~itlc$Ii, aliows clearly that most of tlle111 have
s ~ ~ c c c s ~ l u l pcil{l~ 1n;mt.c l J~~ lc$a ionic coliclete ~emctl~al steps ale taken w~thout
ilny [lelc~y liy [IIC ~UVCIIIIIICIIL, n5 those connectetl w~tli the cotisurnel
C U O ~ ) C I : ~ ~ I V C S , I : ( I O I ) C I ~ ~ I V C S ~ I P C I bil~ilals 111i1y have only n l~oinlnal existence
SU(;(;I<S'I'IONS
0 1 1 tllc bas^$ of the I i ~ ~ d ~ a g s of tlie study peita~n~ng to Workrng Caplml
Mau~~gcnicnt in tllc selectctl silpel bnzaa~s of Andhra Pradesh, ~t IS npposlte to
lnakc iI Icw vlntle suggestions to 1111p1ove Lhe perfor~nance of the sample umts 111
~)niticirlat arlrl the coopc,eriltlvc slrpel bazaars ill general md to help them to
siliinounl Ltie problems tlley have been facing m their dny-to-day b s l n e s ~ The
sopcr bazaars Intended to serve (hex members by proculng essenbal food
and otllcr [terns 11, bulk from product~on polnts and dlstnbutlng among
~ l lc tn i l c~ \ ~II ~ ~ c ~ + ( l l l , l l l l c c111(1 ,1Ih)11l~111le ~ I I C C S They alc also to
gootl$ 111 ll11'lh:~ c~nli PlI11lY Oll ly by la l f i l l~ng theye icglttrnate expectatlolls can
I l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ 5 1 I I l lc l l custotner ,uld protect tlleln agalnsl
LIIIILIIC~ 0 1 l l l l c l l l l ~ i l l I~II~IIIC\IIIICII I I i ~ ~ e v e l , tllcse ob~ectlon a1.e ralely fulfilled
By illc ( 'OII\~IIIILI ('IIOIILIII~IVC ,S\IIICI U i i / . ~ d l ~ 111 Antlh~a I'latiesh n~ ld elsewllele
11 15 IIICII.IIIIC IIIOLII IIII~IOI(~III~ 10 l i~ l (~ II~I~I~I~I I I~~C steps to see hat tlley llnplove
~IICII IICI IOI III:IIII,C illlil wvc IIC~CI 111~11 collsllineis By dolng so tlle consume]
~ o o p u ~ ~ l ~ v c IIIIIVI:III~II~ 15 ;11so ~ l l i e ~ l g t l ~ e ~ ~ e d F~rst o f 011 the coopeiatlve supel
/bcl/il;l~$ II~IVC 10 ire l~clpud to t ~~c l i l c llle plolllen~s vexlng lhem
r I.II+I l r i IIIL IIIIIIIICIII\ I\ IIIC IIC~II~II of financl~l I~SOUIC~S 'l'he fina~lcial
ICSOIIILCI 01 l l l ~ ~II~ICI II:I(:IIII$ $II~LI~(~ 11c sliengthenetl by lncteaslng the11
III~II~IICIL~III~ a t~d C I I ~ I ~ ~ I I I ~ ~IICIII to get loat~s fioln colnrnerc~al b~nks But 111
Ihc LIIIIIIICIIIIVC II~I~III~~Y CIIVII(IIIII~CII~ even fi~ln~lctal Inshtutlons, whlch ale 111
111c IILIIIIIC (CCIOI II~IYC {lot bec11 extetitl~ng sul~port to supel bnzaa~s for
III~~~IIIJ: t11c11 ICIIIIIICII~CII~S I t lias to be admrtted, hawevel, that gettlng
WOI~IIIG C:I~II:I~ illllds [IOIII bn~lks ult~tnately depend3 upon the performance
of Ihc soclctlcs thc~nsclves A$ a mntter o f fact Inany o f these supel bazaats
iwc ao i III ;I posltlon ta SU~II~IL the~r ilnnual reports as silrety as the11
p~of i i ;~ I ) l I~ ty p ~ ~ l t l o n IS very weak So, their probleln of finding filnds 1s
~ntcr-llnkcd with ,101 only tl~ett perfotmatlcc but the lending policy of the
bi~nks. 'I'herefolc, the Gove*lment should take the lnltiative and intervene In
this Il l i l l let so that banks libocnllsc lhe~r financial suppod P Q ~ ~ C Y ow^*^ the
L~I~IIICI:I!IVC ~IIIICI l ~ d / ~ t ~ t t \ . \[I l l t i i t IIIOY sl te~~g lhe~t thetr finmclal resources
;~tl t I t c t ~ i l c ~ ~CIV ILC to c ~ l b t ~ l t l ~ l i d l best they cnu
P I h c ~)~l~(lilllilll~~: 111 l 1 l C \:ltlllll~ ll l l l t? tnakes i t e ~ d e n t tilot tlley have llotpald
I ~ I I I I I I w ~ k n c p a Purtl ln tlIose who ate
~~III~\III~: ,l l lcl 111c f i t ~ ~ l l ~ ~ t : t l II~.II~CIS of [IIC ulpet liazaa~s ate not well velsed in
l l ic I~I.I~~~IJ:CIIICII~ 111 ~vo lh l t l g ~ ~ l l l l l a l 1111111s, titt(i llielt ~11p10acll to 1l1e11 task 18
IIOI $CICI~~I ( iC I ICY (111 110t I l i l~~: i l l ly 111 tl(1~llt tinilflclnl rnarrRge1nent piacttces,
WIIILII ittc vcty vl l t l l 10 l i l l i i l t ~ t i t l t ~ l n ~ i n g e ~ ~ i e t ~ t It is very m p o ~ t m t t l t l~t
LIIIIJICI~IIIVC ~IILICIIC\ ~ V C SO~IIIIIY t11011gl1t to t l ~ i s aspect of W O I ~ I B ~ . ~ U I I ~ S
I""'lc1llly
r l Ill: III~SCIII \(IIIIY \II(IWS 111~1t CIIOOCI~~IV~ super bseaets SII~~CI Eloin scuity
I I I I I L I'llcy tln tlot ltavc st~rfioeat casl~ balances They ruli the11
II~\IIIC$\ r ~ ( ~ u r i i ~ ~ ~ r n c i v ~ r l t ~ ~ t ~ l $ctllicrcal casli ~csomces, whah damage badly
tltctt I I ( JL I I~ I~~ II~\III(III Ibis i r e ~ r l is t tone~snl
I1 I$ i ~ t l v ~ \ i i l ~ l c lor tlrc cooperdtlve lllstlh~ttons to have n co~iip~ehensivc
l o t c ~ d s t ~ n g 111 ciirh, so tllrrt t l ~ c y II~KY be prellnted to meet any shoitage of cosh
a1 ;tr!y i inrltorlar porn1 of ~IJIIC 7 o be able to do so, they have to b~~ng about n
b i ~ l i ~ n c c bclwccit l t ~o f i t ab~ l~ t y and Ilquldity. It1 m y case, if they have excess of
cash II;~I~zK~, tjtcy ~~IOIIJ~J Invest i t 111 short-te~m secllrlties Or deposit In
commclc la l banks i t is suggested that managements PrePue s ~ a t e ~ e l l f i of
casll i l l f lows anll outflows penotlicnlly and assess their finanma1 Posltlon, so
; hi w~11hi111: ~ ~ l l ~ l i t l ilcrl\lollr ~ i l c lafluenccd by vatlous act~v~ties of super
ba/,~:il\. 1:~lllll:illoll (11 CXclLI \V(lll\llig ca[11taI iequ~re~ne~l t IS always a difficult
t i I\\ p r ~ i l ~ c pic!c111 tlcntl. III tile lllniket environnie~it supel bazaars
*IiotiI(I I I ~ ~ ~ I I I ~ ~ I I I I I I IOIC \ I ( I L ~ ( . ~ V I I I L I I I C ~ I I I I I ~ tno~e furitls But they ale not III a
I X ~ Y I I I O I I 10 I ~ I C C ~ W O I L I I I J : ~ i i l l l l i i l lequllements It is also ev~dent fol the
111mc11l ~ni]\i l iy ~111dy Illill 1 1 1 ~ ~ i i%~i~igc~nents of supei bazaa~s ale 110t 111 a
I I I I \ I ~ I I ~ I I lo r i t o l ~ ~ l ~ / c lilt tcclctcrcti illtltls by co i iv~ t~c~r~g fiiial~c~al instilutlons
A\ ' ~ ~ I I ~ L I I O I ~ F 111 ~ ( I ~ I I I ,111: lilikc~l wit11 [lie fina~~cinl performance of coopetat~ve
supel I ) :~ / ; I ; I I \ l l~cy h,nc 10 liiclcaie 1Iie11 bus~ness volume, as tills also e~iables
1111: i i~llci I ~ i l / i l i l ~ \ 111 lllect ll~cii CiIrrciII obl~gal~ons T!~e~cfoie wh~le
I O I I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I I ~ ! I I I I ~ IIIIIILY il~i(I ta1(111l: a dec~s~oii w~th legard to w o ~ k ~ n g capltal
l i~iid\, I I ~ ; I ~ I : I ~ C I I ~ C I ~ ~ 111 ~ I I ~ I C I I I ~ A I I ~ I I S would do well to take all the necessaly
Iiicasiile$ lo rlnpil~vc IIICII cffic~ency In managmg cull'ent futlds
r As 111c~c lilac 70 pcr celit tlf cuileril assets of most super bazaius ale invested
011 invclito~icc tlicy have lo focus mole 011 efficient mmagc~ncnt or
Invcllloilcs. 'Sbc liivcntoly luniover stloulld be speeded up so that the uillts
lnrnlinlze t l~elr il~ve~rtoires hr tlie pieseat Inqelry it is found that all most all
tllc supcr bazn:\rs have problems of pdmg up of i l l v e n t o ~ m clad1 Because
o r p"blems blocklllg of tnventorles III cloth, some societies have already
wltildrnwn clolll llelns, Therefore it is a dire t~ecesslty that they keep a close
r 111 olllcl to ~ lv l l l l l \V:l$l,lI:c 111 lllvclltoly lnanage~~ient, plopel Rllmlgcmen+ for
grrtrtl\ III i:otlt~~vil$ ~ l i ~ l l l t l llc i l~aile If the stock 1s on a [;lrge scale, any
, l j ~ l t r r l j ~ r ~ ~ ~ l t ' I I I~CI I~I~I~~ I~L~IIII~~IIC 1s to be adooled fol stock~ng atld piotectrng
I I I I I Y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I llcie ~lic;~slllcS ~!lhlniitely lead to rnllllmlsmg the
p ~ t l h l c ~ r ~ t III ~ ~ ~ v c l i l u i y alltl ~n~~x~rn i rep~of i l ab~ l i ty
, 11 15 .1lw I~II~CIVC~I llli~l 1111: ~)e~sorlnel who ale look~ng aRer lliventorles we
cllllcl IIIII vcly sc~ IIIII\ II(IOII~ I~ICII WOI k 01 ullaware of the lrnportarlce o f the
III~IIIII~:CIIICIII (11 IIIVCIIIIIIY I IICIC~OIC i t IS VCIY r l l ~~~o~ tan t tl~at the p e ~ s o ~ ~ ~ ~ e i
wlli l ,IIC* Irroh111): , l l lc~ VIIIIOII\ I~~IIIS of lllventuty ale educated and haineri m
~ I I I ~ ICK~IIII 11) I~IIIII~v ;I SLICII~I~~C apjjioacli 011ly then the ef'fic~er~cy of
~IIVcaioly ilcli111l111cr11 \vollltl ilnplove I t i s also uecessary to fix n nor111 f o ~
IIIV~II~CII~ IUIIIIIVCI III cernlc (11 lllc lilllllber oFti~nes These nomls cnn be set
by Lllrryttlfi 0111 III~C~~III-~~IIII COIII~II~IIFOII i n 1111s regnld the supel bazaars crrn
111kc tlle l t c l l~ ol (:nl~sultnllcy nlitl l'lomotion Cell of NCCF Llmrted, New
I ) c l h~
i I1 IS trlso r)l)savcd ~IIIIL ihe coupelnt~ve siipel bazilars have only a rnxrbqnal
love[ of C I C ~ I ~ sdcs partlcuIt~rIy to the Govemlnent deparments and
~[~r i tv~r l i te [ consllnlcrs. I t scetns the11 collect~o~l efficiency too 1s nlodelate
IS rcceFsaly to c~llloucc credit snles to all the govemtnent departmellls,
institutlons, find I[I((IYL~UBI COIISIIJII~~S by form~1atmfi 8 ~ ~ e ~ l f i ~ uedlt !Jal'cy
I I I I I I I 'i'lnr would augmellt tllc sales volllme At
11lc j.1111~ IIIIIL' 111~ CI~IICLIIOII ?Y\(CIII lras to be rmproved anti speeded up
\VII~I(IIII IC,IVIII~: IO 11,lil 11ch 11 15 .~lao advrsecl to forznulaie an npproplliite
clc(llt II~IILY '11111 l l ) l l ~ ~ II sI~I I I~~I I I I~
r I:IIIIIICI 11 I\ II~)\CIVC(~ IIlIlt ~ C W LO-o]lelat~vc soc~eties follow ally lnventoly
LOIIIIO~ 1(,1 IIIII~IIV* I\\ IIIVCIII(IIY ~( l t i t lo l teci~~~lq~les would glve beltel result$,
11 I\ w l f i l o ~ l ~ 111 ,nir~pt llrvetitoly colrllol ineasules Tot enhanc~ng eficlency 10
I:L~II~IIIIIC OIIICI ~)II:IIIIII~ (I:O()), ABC allalysls ctc ate adopted by the
, l l ~ l ~ ~ t l l ! \
r I t IS 11ll\c1 v t ~ l I~I,II 111 ~I~IIIIISI 1111 (IIC ~III~IC sllper bazaars the~e 1s a low p~ofi le
01 III(IIIIIII) II'~ &veII :I\ [ ~ ~ i ~ l i l i ~ ( ~ ~ l ~ t y ~OSI~IOII l'he cunent tatro and I ~ q u ~ d ~ t y
I ,11111 IIIC I)CIII\V ~IIC ~ta110~1rds 'I'l~clcfore i t 1s su1g8ested that they Increase the
VII~IIIII~ 111 cilrlcrlt ;laguts wl11c11 leads to a so1111d llquldlty posllton
.P I'lrc illrntrvcl tl lttoi rn a l l lllc sarlrplc bnzaatq ale lower than the stnndclrd 1Iis
t i LI~IC aectl to nnplovc the clneover of Invcntoly, debtors and cash component
by w l~ l c l l tllc (irofitsblllty a l~d Ilquld~ty can be improved. It IS suggestctl tilot
tire nl;l~l;cycnicnts tllke care or a11 tlrese tlinrgs by propaly analyzulg the
vllllouh cclnlponclllr ofculrel~t ilssets
2. DI~.,II~ tllc study i t rvns observed t l ~ t the major sources of the supel bszaals
w c ~ e clinlrr~cllscd towards workrrlg c~pltal COmpOnefltE, p;utlculflrl~ t ~ w g d s
rllc lnvcrltory was also observed that tlie tnwntory turnover was at fl low
clib IVIIILII LIII)\VC~ (IIJ\VII l l te t ~ l l c ~ ~ ~ t l a g cycle Theiefole I[ 1s llecessary tllat
IIIC WOI~III~: luntls CIIC prclpcrly lltilisetl to Illcrease tlie h~tnover on vailous
~ ~ ~ i i ~ p o n c l t l ivll~11)lll c\Lc\\lvciy 5Id~hClllllg any particulal componellt of the
I~,llhll1~~, ~illlllill
r Il lc ~ ) ~ ~ ~ l l l r ~ t l c i i ~LCIIIIY l i l t i t l l ~ l i l l l cso~~~cef IS colnlnon to al~nosr all the super
II.I/II,II\. I)CL.III'I~ (11 i ~ ~ > ~ ~ - i i ~ i ~ ~ l i l ~ ~ l l ~ l y 01 ?llfticleltt runtis, lnab~l~ty to get the
~ c c l ~ ~ ~ l c t l 1111ttl\ tllc IC(IIIIIC~ ~I I I~C Anil tile cost orlrorrow~ng is vety h ~ g l ~
111 11119 1c1(~11(1 ~IIC (;~VCIIIIIICII~ IIIII~ biillks come forward to offel financial
lo nll~pil I illld 'li~l~~:li,l~(l Ill(> III~CICSI\ of ~ o ~ l ~ l l l l l e l Coopeiatlves as these ale
LAII~:~II 111 t11c 11i1y 111 g10l111l CLIIII~~C~I~IOII Fulthei, ptlvatc Lladc~s tile
~s~;IIIII$IIIII~: ~II~ICI III~II hcts 011 11 lit~ge scale il~aklllg athactivc anangernents to
IIIIO COIISIIIIICI\ tci\vi~~~Is ll1e11 $11011~
r I:llo~ts \ l i t ~ t ~ l d i i l50 IIC IIIII~C to shengthen the ~nternal soulces of the
co1)pci:1t1vc5 hy IIICIC:I'~III~ ~IIC ICVCIV eiiliilngs by means of lnc~easlng the
slllcr volu~nc 111 11rr$ lega~tl lntctlslve sales cnmpnlgn, product
d~vcisrt i~ntroer, witlc pliblrnlty will llelp rn aclt~ent~g the tslgeted sales
l ,u l t l le~ i t wris obse~vcd tllal tile ovcil~ead expenses o f the stunple rm1t.3 were
c o n s ~ d ~ l ; l b ( ~ ll,yh 'rllerefore i t 1s advisable for them to reduce the ovclllead
exl~e~rscr, by ndopling bi~dget~ng and budgetary oonkols.
r III ir~clcl III l l l l ~ r l ~ i v c l l lc ~lvt'l,lll c f f i ~ l ~ l i c y I11 filiallee atltl other aspects
~it,ln,il:cinclll. ~ ~ u l c ~ ~ n ~ ~ l ' l l in:lll:lgcls \lioul[l be employed by tlie lllslltuhon to
,111~:"'"" Illlill \<ll?., .1111I ~ I C t l ~ l l l l l i l I l L C
.- 11 1s ;II\II i~ l i i c i vc r l 1l1,rl IIOIIIIL~II i l i tel fclel~~e in ilte wolk~rig of cooper,ltlve
\II~I~I ll,l/dd19 1111s II~UII 1111 Llle 1nuc:ite Mnl~y people ate uslllg tilese
LOI~J)CIIIIIVI~\ il\ ~ I c l l j l l l l ~ : FIUIICS 1111 lll~ll ~ l ~ \ l l l c a i caleei and oftell lo plomote
I I I I I I I I I I I It 15 I I ~ L C I ~ R I ~ lo kee11 nway po~llrcill ~ntetfeletice ntld
.- ( ' ~ ~ c i l r c l ~ i l ~ v r ~IIIIUI II,I/;I;IIS lhilvc ccitrlc llito belng to supply the essential food
ilcliia 1l1,ul ,tic 11;ltlly IC(IIIIICII by lllc tnajoi segrnetlt of people To seme the
CIIIIIIIIIIUI'~ I ic i (c~, IIIC ~ ~ ( i l ~ e i i l l ~ v c silpel ~ B Z ~ R I S sllould p~acuse all the food
Ilcln\ l i o i l l l l ic ~III~~IICIIIIII 1io11i1 in bulk, l~u~cl~ase all rnate~lals in bdk at low
IIIILUI r~llll 11111~ I~IOVIIIC ;ill 1110 i ~ r l t ~~ tea~e r~ t s ofco~~sumers
r 1'0 n~:ikc [)li~ch;isc.;, llielc is ;I system o f i"o~~ttlnga purcl~ases co~nlnlttee fiom
illliong ll lc nlctrtbcis of coopctntive super bazaars Whtle fonnlng such a
COIIIIIIIIICC i t i'i CSSCIIIIII~ to lnitke sule that the persons selected as membels
Ilavc ~~dcquntc ktloruledge 111 the area of purcltases, so that the qua11@ of
guotls pc~rchasetl 1s assutetl aitd tlre prlce pattl 1s sensonable
i. Al111os~ nll coopelatwe supet baznats have tlie problem of plllllg UP ~ l l s ~ i d
stock :kfclotlls Tills problen~ usually nr~scs because of i r l a b ~ n d purchase of
vmious itc,lls of cloth lrrcspective o f their requltetnent, designs, fashion and
I~IL:?CIII I I I O V C I I I C I I ~ lhelc IS ,I lot uf c r ~ t ~ c i s ~ n f ~ o ~ collsumels lhat tllose who
alc lC9l;i~l5lbl~ f i l l 111~ plll~iltI.;e ale peisuaded by un-saleable clotll, beonuse
r l l q ~dic o l l l c l ~ l t c gi:ltltietl I1 1s suggested tllnt purchas~ng
~ I I I ! I I ~ ~ clln\l5l (!I lllcnlIlcl5 111 lionesty, tntegsl& atld dlgnlty a~rd have tile
I ~ ~ ~ U I I C ' I L ~ ~ o w l c d ~ c 111 tlilt lcgald Ccllal~lly ~t wollld rellcve supel b u n a s
i io l l~ l l ~ c ~ ~ I I I ~ I I I I I ~ ~ I I ( ~ ~ J I C I I ~ of I I I I S L I J ~ I I I V ~ I I ~ O I Y If tile i~~isoirl stock 1s
ali~roi 111i1l I I I WC, 1Irc I I ~ ~ I I I C I ~ C I I I C I ~ ~ sl lo~~ld tnke im~ned~ale rneasu~es to dlspose
I I oli , CVCII by ollc11irg ~ I S C O I I I I ~ Accumm~latian woulrl only wo~sell the
Sllll,IllllIl
r I he C I I I I { I C I I I ~ I V L : SI I I ICI bnllllll~ ille atlvl~ctl 10 m11it81n RIKI have in dlsplily all
v,~!lcllc\ ol collaulnci goods, as consualels expect to yet all of the11
rcc[irllclllcrlir i~r~tlct rlnc itrol'
'I llc ~ I U L I , s l i o~~ ld i ~ t l i ~ r ~ g ~ i l I I I 811 alhactlve way The propel classrficat~an of
~:ootl\ i \ vcly es\c~~tlal 111 t l~is lcga~d Val~ous categories of goods have to be
I I oltlcr 1111tl 10 be arrirrtged in dlfferer~t depnrhne~its as pel tlle
CIl~Cg011Li111011E if tile (I~spIay of goods IS ath~ctlve nnd irnplesslve
cons i~ i i r e~s would bc el~couli~ged to wslt the super bazants
111 ntlil~llor~ to propel tnangc inc~~l of stock, tlie shops should be fulnlsbed
~ v l t h olodeln locks and colouiful showcases It is what 1s osually done by
111 ivak t l adc~s , Of course, investlnent is the first co11sldclaL1on However, the
srrpct. l)azans slloIj[d mobilize the requr~td funds to ]nett all sllch nddlt~oll~l
expellt l~[u~c l o keep tllc shop alhaclrve, wheh u sure to Pay dividends
I Ilc hllc\ lrc~\(lllrlcl jhoaltl be corii teous towa~ds tlle consuiners and attend to
tllc~lr 111ollll)Lly nll(1 ll(1lltcly '['lie lritclest of co~lsuiners m tile supel bazaar
I I I I I I I I ~ ~ ~le])clld+ li~lI1ll ~ I O W t l l ~ [lelronne~ 111 the sllop heat lhern Tlielefole +Ile
+ ; I I C ~ ~ J ~ I \ ~ I I I I I ~ ~ \I~olll(l Ilc 11:nnetl p ~ o p e ~ l y 011 modetn business l~nes in tllis
1cgai11, lllc t~~l l l l l~ lg prOgli111llllc5 conducted by coopelahve lnstih~tlor~s urlder
tile , N I S ~ I I L ~ \ ol tllc Ni~l~ollal Coi~petatlve UIIIOI~ of Iildia (NCUI) are wort11
I I I C I I I I O I I I I I ~ I'IIc $IIIICI IIII/IIIII\ ctiii gct ilsslstalice fioln the Goverrlment fol
r SOIIIC YII ] )CI bir~ilil~i iIIC localcrl III leinote atld inconveilrent places As aiesult
llrcy 11111 1 0 i c ~ v c lllc puil)o$c ~ O I wllich ll~ey aic ~ttterlded Therefole they
\11i)11l(l I)c IIICIIIC(I III t l i ~ I I C I I I ~ of tile low11 and III l~laces whelc peoplc move
, I ~ I ~ I I ~ lo1 l l r c ~ ~ ~lcetls It 1s colnluoll expellence that people go to places wlieie
; I I I 1lcr11s ~crlltr~ctl 11y tllet~l rue f o u ~ ~ d , and w111cl1 ale located m collvenlent and
: I C L C \ \ I I I I C I I ~ B C C S NO COIISIIIIICI go to a coopelntive sl~pci bazaals whlcl~ IS
lociilc(l I I I ;I w~nolc oi fill on' place Hence, ~t 1s desi~nble to locate supel
O;I/.IIIIIS I I I ~ ~ I I V C I I I C I I ~ places ptefelably 111 the fiist floo~s of buildings Of
cou~sc, ihcy can be located 111 multl-stored buildmgs if they have the l t f l
f i l c~ l~ ty Wflclcver h e y ate located ttrey have to be wthlll the reach of
COilStllllClS
2. I t IS obce~ved tlur~ng tlie study thtt tllere are many pr~vnte super bazaars,
wlllcll ale lllaklng very goo(! p~ofits and ntnnlng 011 most successfil ]mess
w h e ~ c a s cooperative super bazna~s are elther rumung on losses or minimal
~ " o l i l I Ilcl(:folc 11 I., \ l l ~ g ~ \ l c d 111,lt ttlelc shoulti be plopel plmlIlg of ole
,II~ICI II~I/:I~II\ l ~ ~ i d [IICII ~ ~ I R C I I'IYucI kecp~l~g 111 view tile exlst,ng dnnand and
~ ~ ~ ~ u ~ ~ c l l l l ~ l l l ~111111 I ~ I I V I I I C [ l ~ l d ~ l \ '1'11~ vely pulpose of starting coopaatlve
\ I I ~ C I II~I/.I~III 111 0111 LOIIIIIIY I!, to nuke tliclll offer keen compehtlon to
IN IV,IIC ic.~dc~'. 111 OI~ICI 10 LIICL~ [lie ~nalp~ncllces pacticed by 1111sc1upulo~~~
111 IV~IIC II,I~LI \. 411 111~11 I~IC III~(: IC\I+ ill collslllltels ibre plotected nt~d served
r 111 lllr i.onlr.il 0 1 [ : l ~ I i ; ~ l ~ s ; ~ t ~ o ~ i 11 lot of cllangea ]lave been made the consume1
flotur b l i ~ l t t ~ ~ ; ~ l ~ o n ; i l Lonlp;illlcs ;ale entellng III to trade in essential f ~ o d
IICIII.,, I:I(ILCI IPI, i l ~ i l l l s IIII~ OIIICI ~elillcil icilllllelnents of consumels eve11 111
IIICI~IIIIII \IIC~ III\VII\. IVIIII ;I InI 01 I!lvestment and antacllon Tfie coopelnllve
1 1 1 1 1 ~ II,I/,I;III II;I~C 111tr1 IIIV~~III~~L;III~C betc~ie tlle~n for wallt of tesoulces
r I0 \IILLCC~ 111 LOIISIIIIICI IIII';IIICSY, comlr~tment, determlnatlon, competitlve
1111111 ,III~ ~CYOIIOII ~IIC ICI~IIIIC~ 111 tliose who lire l~~volved tn i t These are
I I I~~I I I~ III ~lrc ~ I I C ~ ~ I I L ',i~ilclulc ot supel bazaars in Alldhrii P~adesll and in
I I I 11 I+ r i t111c llectl to llnprove the competitlve spirlt, busmess
LICIII~ICII. E~~~CICIICY, tillcrlt iltld I)roper pl~ulln! to boost up the sales and
I I I ~ ~ I C ~ ~ of 's~~l)cr ba~iiars
'I'lle salts ~ ~ c ~ s t r t ~ n e l workllig III cool~elatlve supel bazaats should fee l a sense
of' beloog~n@ers, wlllcli is very essential m a cooperative movement The11
sllccess ]argcly clepentls upon it They also should work with sense of
conun~tlncnt and detllcnhon to promote the success of the11 units T l l c ~ must
constantly bear ill nund that they serve a good and altruishc CaIIses dlts
I C ; I 1 1 1 1 1 1 l l t ~ l ~ ~ l l l i l I I I I C Fmthe~ tllc conceptof Human Resoulce
~ ) c v c l o l i i l i ~ ~ ~ l II;I\ to be ttlkca t c~~ol i s ly ru~d plalu~ed fol enrrchlng tilerr
Itoorvlcrl~c on 111oclc111 Iincf
r 111 o~clcl 10 i l l : l l ~ ~ t i ~ ~ ~ l ~ C I I I ~ I L I I I L ~ 111 Y I I ~ I ~ I bazai~ts elections to dlffelent elected
Iiodlci 111 tllc iul~ci I I~/ , I I I I \ \1111111d be coiltluctetl ~eg~llally So that electeci
I I I C I I I ~ I C I \ I C I I I I I LO ~ I I I V L : ([I IIC ~lfictciit and those who gel elected afiesll wlll
le<l~n 11r1w lo er111t111ct tl~cr~~scivcs cfficrently Regiilar democrat~c elect~ons
n ~ t r i ~ l ~ l L I C I I ~ C 111 I I I ~ I I I ~ ) C I ~ boll1 tl~telcst i111d II sense of responslbll~ty towaids
COIISIIIIICI L~I[I I )CII I I IVC ~ I I I I C I 11ali1,11$, and tl~ert develop~nent
r I 1 w.15 i l l ~ l l IIOIILCCI ~ I U I I I I ~ l l ~ e ~Illdy that 111ost of the sntnple supel bazaus
w c ~ c 1101 ic j i~~l i~r ly t~~i(l~tiiig tllct~ accou~lts I'lopei atid tlinely audlting of
acLcuirtr wul~lcl p ~ o v ~ ~ i c ~ I ~ ~ I I I I I I I ~ I I ~ I I to assess the perfolmnnce 111 drffeleut
tl~incntlons In I ; I ~ I sucl~ ;~sacss~~leill wodd fncll~tnte tlie super bazaars to plan
1111 I I I I U I C dcvclop~nent As ihesc Super bmaius are ~ireyl i l r in gemtlg the11
;Iccclolll\ ,~i~dltetl, tllcy ale III tlo~k~less regardrag the11 financ~al petfo~mnnce
I I IS very ln l l~or t~u~l that tile soc~et~es get theu accounts regula~ly aud~ted
Ally soclcty, whrcl~ 11ns islletl to finel~se the accounts every year, should be
[)ciinl~sctl.
2. is t~lso suggested to colnputellze the bllllt~g system m the coopelatlve supe
bnznnls as 111 private sbops, which glves perfect recording of accounts and
ell~ninntes inalpmctices, and also saves a lot of time and manuer labour
i II I S Y(.I\, I I ~ I I ~ C I C I I I V ( : 11) IIY IC\O(III$IIIIII~ICS rill t l~e sales pelsonlle[ relabng to
I I I I 1 1 I1 15 ;~dv~sct l to fix target olIeIltetl lncentlves to
C~ILI~~II~IJ 'C tlir \:IIP\ IICI\OIIIIC~ to L'XCI~ tl~c~liselves e r i t h ~ s ~ a s t ~ c ~ j l ~ for the
Iictlv1111r111 111 thv LIIIIJII~I~~IIVC \IIIICI II;ITR~IIS
r I l icrc \ l io i i l ( l l i c .I ICJ:III,II iillil ~ c l r r r d ~ ~ i i l V~II~~C~I~IOII of the stocks l'Ills
IN,IC~IC r 1,11:1iiir.5 thc i l l l ~ k ]1~191i1111~~ ti1 k l i o ~ v the stock posibon, its rnovcrnei~l
{t i i t i rciliiilctlic.llt I1 IICI~I\ llicro to icicntlfy fast end slow m o v ~ s g rtefns,
~ l l c i c l ~ y . , l r i l l (IcLI(~L. to II~II~I~III~U ~IIC slow 1noYitlg items, 8114 to cleai 1111sold
r A l l t l lc l1111,c Iocld i lcl i ir n r ld III tlie su]lc~ bazaals should be 11ackcd nrtd
iv;i lct l n'1tl1 1r101iu I i i I ~ : l l ~ag A\ coitsumeis prefcl to bity atl lnct~vely pte-
I';ILL~II OII~I~IICI\, coc l~c~s l i ve wpe l bazaa15 too sliould adopt tills system.
;Is.;rlllill: :it 1111: \,~IIIC ~IIIIC, Co~leCl welgl1111e11t altd qual~ty A l l the tequlled
t l ~ : t ~ i ~ l i ;llrtic~t 111c p i ~ i t l l ~ c t shooltl be tllspleyetl correctly on the label for the
I l c l l c i i l o l c l l l lwl l le ls
r l Ilc (iovc1111,lcnt s l iot~l t l arr;lilge f o ~ the pu~chase of stillroi~ery anti otller
1lc111s ~ c c l t l ~ l e t l by 119 vartoIIs tleprrrtments, f i o ~ n fire coopernfive supel bazam.
'I'hrs g l v c ~ I K J ~ ~ ~ lnojnl arrd ina~c i la l boost to them and strengthen and sustalrls
Ihc i r ~ n l c s vnlun~o
7 ' rhc very purpose of a consuarcr cooperative is to serve the aveiage consumer
by providin8 1tcms of (IURII~Y at reasonable price i t is expected to supply
uiladuliel:lted foot1 items nccolrling to c o r i ~ c t quult l ly and welgllt
I I L ' I I V flII)CI b:l/;l:ll\ i l l C C X ~ I C L ~ C ~ ti1 b l ~ y productS 111 bulk from
l ~ ~ i ~ i ~ ~ ~ l l l I I 1 I 0 1 To Ct~lllfiI the11 objectlves and
~r1111(:,1111111'1 10 L(lll'llllllL'I1. I i l e ~ I I C C i I ail tile fads rerl~r~red It 1s wllli to
I~II,III(.III~ I ( . I ~ I I I L C I I1I!I\I L 0 l I I ) C l i ~ l l ~ ~ Sllllel baz881s ale sevelely liimdlc.apped
~IIII<:\\ lllclr I l~o$c la $Ilci~gthelletl they calmat serve the people
+II~I+I,ILIIIIII~ IIICY IC~JIIIIC ~)I[I~ICI WOI~III~ rulitls, wlilch IS the secret of
\IILL~J\ 01 ,IIIY II~I~IIII!Y\ ~ ~ i g i t ~ i l / i l t ~ t l ~ i i'iieiefore they must have a sound
JJ~~III 1111 IUIII~~ irtiil I I I ~ I I I ~~C ll1e111 wller~ ol~ti~lned wltll ut~nost cue ruld
L L ! : I I ~ I : ~ I i l ; i ~ l o y f'lic$e societies ~lroirld adopt asclent~fic spp~oacl~ to
I l~cr i I~ l l \ r r r rv ,II,(IYIIIUI i15 well ;IS nlnllaging fhen scale fi~lanc~ai resouices
I'r~ltlct~c I I I I o C thcii wo~krng ca111tai certamly Implove Ulet
IICI~IIIIII~~IICC, llces 111cti1 tru111 l l ~e vrc~oas circles of serious financ~ill pioblems,
atltl 11clps lllclrl to illlprove Ihelr ptof i t~bl l~ty and I I ~ U I ~ I ~ Iiltlmately the
I~II~KISC, ((11 w l l l ~ l l t l~cy tire sta~kctl, I e rendellllg sernces to the consumels,
,voc~ld i l l~o ~ l ~ ~ l r l c t j t l y selved To repent, efficient managemellt of wolklng
cap1t;ll is tllc llani,ccfi .- tile cu~e-ali.fol all the problems menacing the
/I 5CL.1115 III'LC~IIIIY 111 dlld I/ltlI t i le LoIlSlllnel, wllo IS expected to derive the
l ~ c t t c l i l j ill LOIIIIIIIICI L l ~ - ~ ~ I l C l d l I v ~ ~OCICIICS a11d bdzaats, also has ~ ~ ~ n p ~ f i ~ ~ t
~ t l l c 111 11l~tv 111 5115111111 l l l ~ s ~ . III'~~I~~I~IOIIY a l ld help them to Implove tIiell
C I I I I I I ~ I I I I lllil~~lil 111 o ~ l l l g 11 I11155tVC obse l~e l a~hwlng t111np.s to dilft 01
c\llccrtrlja IIIIILI* (111~ I:O~~(.~IIIIIL.II~ c ~ ~ ~ ( l t l ~ e ipclso~~ael o f the supel banlais etc) to
IIICIII~ 111~1IItt\. IIC Ild5 LII IIIISCII 11~1 c ~ ~ l l v ~ IIILCICS~ 111 the collsitlnel inovelnent mid
CIILO~IIII~:~: ,I\ III~IL~I i15 1111<'11111e ~IIC co011c1at1ve super bazaars to do well and
I I I IC~~I I I I I I I IL I I c 5ho1t111 1101 illlow llllnself to be lu~ed away by the
ICIII~IIIII~: 111111 LICLCII~IV~ 11 I L ~ Y ~ I I I ~ OIICIS 111 the pllvate i ladels and supel 111n~kets
WIIILII ,IIC 1101~ III~I\~IIIIIIIIIIII~ CVCI~LVIICIC I h e collsumel must shake 1111nself
IICC (11 111c II;IIIII (11 11cl11g ;I tr lu~c o~ i ioo i te~ a l t l v~ctlin, to w l ~ ~ c h he has been
LOI~C~IIIIIIIC(~ 11y CIILIIIII<~;IIICCI 1111 aye5