Upload
jessica-terry
View
243
Download
7
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Chapter 9: Distribution Channels and Supply Chain
Management in High-Tech Markets
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
How do prices of goods in direct and indirect channels compare?
What challenges must the sales and marketing departments overcome in working together?
Which intermediaries are prominent in high-tech channels?
Why do companies choose to “green” their supply chain?
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Comprised of the various players in the
flow of product: producer consumer
Distribution channels are used to establish
brand identity and preference
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Distribution activities
◦ Logistics and physical distribution functions
◦ Structure and management of the channel
Manufacturers must manage:
◦ flow of product
◦ relationships between firms
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
The goals of effective distribution channels:
◦ Eliminate redundancies and inefficiencies in the system
◦ Develop relationships and alliances with key players
◦ Provide value to the end customer effectively and efficiently
◦ Achieve both cost advantages and customer satisfaction
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
The number of levels and companies involved in the flow of product from producer to end user
A.Direct Channels: Manufacturer Customer
Provide full control over the execution of marketing strategy and a performance benchmark for indirect channels
• Company sales force
• Company web site
• Company owned retail outlets
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
B. Indirect Channels: Rely on Intermediaries• provide amount/variety assortments for
customers• provide service and other facilitating
functions• communicate with end users
Contact efficiencies• Cybermediaries
Delegate to core competencies of distribution and logistics
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
C. Hybrid, Dual, or Concurrent Channels: combination of direct and indirect channel structure
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
C. Hybrid, Dual, or Concurrent Channels (cont.)
This structure is more prevalent when:
• market size and growth are strong
• the offering is perceived as less standardized
• customers don’t form buying groups to increase their bargaining power
• customers’ needs and buying behavior are stable across purchasing occasions
Intrabrand Competition
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Channel Design◦What determines customer channel selection?
ease-of-use price search effort service
information quality aesthetic appeal convenience assortment enjoyment
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Direct Sales
◦Gain control of the product message and CRM
◦Sales force management of interface between:
Direct sales force and indirect channels
Sales Department and the Marketing Department
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Type Characteristics UsefulNeeds to Change
“Undefined”- Independent
Lack of knowledge about what other is doing
Small company, Marketing supports Sales
Regular conflicts, inefficient
“Defined”- Clear Roles
Clear processes, boundaries, & responsibilities
Simple products, traditional roles
Demand for customization, accelerating technology
“Aligned”- Cooperate
Joint planningSimple sales process, short sales cycle
Common process can generate more revenue
“Integrated”- Collaboration
Shared structure, systems and metrics
See Table 9-2
Four Types of Relationships Between Sales and Marketing
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Sales Over Company Website
◦Brick & Clips Distribution Model: Company-direct Website in addition to traditional
offline channels
◦A variety of factors must be considered before going to this model including:
Backlash from existing channels Cannibalization
Disintermediation
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Company Owned Retail Outlets
◦Fully integrate retail sales into marketing strategy
◦Channel Evolution Theory Consumers are more comfortable going to a single
brand store
◦Can also cause conflict with intermediaries in indirect channels
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Offline retail stores, online retail stores, catalogs, kiosks
IntermediariesWhich type?
◦Distributors: Buy from manufacturer, sell to other resellers Typically national
◦Resellers: Provide products/services to match end user needs Typically local
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
VAR/VADSystems
IntegratorsInbound vs. Outbound
Traditional Intermediari
es
Add value through own
expertiseSpecialized
Store-front for walk-ins
Mass merchandisers
, Category killers,
Customize for vertical
markets
Manage large or complex projects
Calls on customers
Mom-and-pop stores,
franchises
Types of Resellers
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
IntermediariesHow Many?
◦Coverage, Penetration Degree of coverage vs. Degree of intrabrand competition
◦ Interbrand Competition: Different brands = healthy
◦ Intrabrand Competition: Same brand = unhealthy Use of territorial restrictions
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
High-Tech Channels
Need for indirect channels to provide value to
manufacturer
Blurring of distinctive members in the supply chain
Evolution of high-tech channels
The Internet
Gray markets
Black markets, piracy and export restrictions
Supply chain management
software
Vertical hubs
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Distributors (To grow base of VARs)
Direct Sales to CEMs and Integrators S
AL
ES
Early, Early
Market
High Growth/ Critical
Mass
Mature Market/ Technology
Standardized
Time
Early Adopters
Traditional Retailers
Mass Merchant
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Retail channel useful for mainstream market rather than crossing the chasm
Does not create demand nor help develop “whole product”
To “cross the chasm”◦ Direct sales channel useful, but requires volume
and predictability of revenues
May need VARs and Systems Integrators
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Governance Mechanisms
◦Authoritative (unilateral) control Ownership Formal centralized decision making (franchising) Power
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Governance Mechanisms
◦Bilateral controls Mutual interest Flexibility/adaptation Mutual sharing of benefits/burdens Collaborative communication Relational norms (shared expectations) to work
together Information sharing Joint interdependence and commitment Trust
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Governance Mechanisms
◦Coercive influence Promises and threats Effective when the channel member is highly
dependent on the marketer
◦Non-coercive influence Information and persuasive arguments Rational argument
1. Make a claim2. Provide evidence3. Exhort the channel member to act
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Governance Mechanisms
◦Legal Issues
Tying Sale of product linked to second product Bundled rebates
Exclusive Dealing Restrict dealer to carry only one brand of a
product Designed to ensure incentive for service Antitrust issues arise if access to competition
restricted
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Reseller’s contribution to supplier profits Reseller’s contribution to supplier sales Reseller’s contribution to growth Reseller’s competence Reseller’s compliance Reseller’s adaptability Reseller’s loyalty Customer satisfaction with reseller
Assessing both quantitative and qualitative
performance indicators is pertinent.
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Objectives:
◦ Increase coverage
◦ Maintain cost efficiency
◦ Minimize conflict
Steps (see following slides)
1.Gather market data
2.Harmonize following the contingency theory
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Assess:◦ Market opportunity◦ Coverage models◦ Channel-specific benefit/cost analysis◦ Magnitude of conflict
Degree of cannibalization
Effectively communicate justification for distribution strategies◦ Logic
◦ Quantification
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
CHANNEL PERFORMANCE
CHANNELS
TASKS
TARGETS
Contingency Approach to Developing Hybrid Channels
The type of channel used must match particular “contingent” factors to optimize outcomes
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Effective Implementation of the Contingency Theory:
a) Identify customer target segments
b)Delineate the tasks to sell to those segments
c) Allocate the most efficient/effective channels to those tasks
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Allocating Tasks to Channels
Lea
d G
ener
atio
n
Qua
lify
Sale
s
Pres
ales
Clo
se
Sale
s
Post
Sal
es
Serv
ice
Acc
t. M
gmt.
National Acct. Mgmt.
Big
Direct Sales
Telemarketing Medium
Direct Mail
Small
Retail Sales
Distributors
Dealers/ VARs
Tasks
Channels
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
The tenor of the relationshipo Relational vs. adversarial
CRM◦ Effectively track customers◦ SOA: Service-oriented
Compensation & Communication
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Long tail strategy:
◦ “Blockbuster” vs. Niche 80/20 rule
◦ Slow-moving 80% Profitable
Number of products in: the “long tail” > the “head”?
Total sales from: “long tail” products > “head” products?
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Diversion of goods to unauthorized distributors, sold at discounted prices
◦ Intra-brand competition, channel conflict
◦ Legitimate channels lose:
Business
Incentive to push sales/provide service
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Causes Solutions
Volume discount price policiesEliminate sales to the source of
the gray marketDifferentials in int’l exchange
ratesEliminate the arbitrage
problem: one-price policyDifferent resellers’ cost
structuresIncrease market penetration
Highly selective distributionGather information on gray
market problem
Producers performing many marketing functions
Institute consistent performance measures internally
Inconsistent internal policies
(Table 9-4)
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Black Markets Counterfeits
Piracy
◦ Especially problematic with unit-one cost structures
Export Restrictions ◦ To protect U.S. security interests
Do controls actually undermine the U.S.’ position as a technology leader?
Inevitably transfer: “friendly” restricted countries
Strict restriction drives countries to other suppliers
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Considerations:
◦Affordability and experiential learning
◦Physical distribution and product promotion
◦Alternative energy sources
◦Direct channels or training new channel members
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Logistical management of incoming components in the manufacturing process
Match inflow with market demand◦ Demand-backward approach
Challenges:◦ Increasingly shorter life cycles of high-tech products
◦ Demand is constantly changing
Standard supply chain management practices are ill-equipped to deal with the risks and uncertainties
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Goals:◦ Reduce inventory as work-in-progress
◦ Reduce cycle time
◦ Electronically link customers
Requirements:
◦ Accurate forecasts
◦ Flexibility
◦ Focus on the customer
◦ Effective collaboration across both intra- and inter-organizational boundaries
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Demand Uncertainty Difficult to predict end-consumer demand
Bullwhip effect: Market signals get distorted up the supply chain
LOW for functional products ◦ Familiar to end-consumers
HIGH for innovative products ◦ End-consumer risk
To reduce demand uncertainty: Supply chain members must share information about market
demand
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Supply Uncertainty Difficult to predict the necessary quality and quantity
of raw materials, components, infrastructure, supplies and services
LOW for a stable supply process, mature technology
HIGH for an evolving supply process, changing technology, unknown supplier base
To reduce supply uncertainty: Early design collaboration Joint product development with suppliers Participation in on-line marketplaces for synchronized planning
with suppliers
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Supply Chain
Functions
Type of Innovation
Incremental Breakthrough
Physical Function
Market Mediation Functions
= Appropriate Match, = Inappropriate Match
Match of type of product to supply chain functions
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Efficient supply chains◦ Economies of scale◦Reduce non-value-added activities◦Share accurate/timely information with suppliers
Example: Wal-mart, Costco
Risk-hedging supply chains ◦ Pool resources to avoid disruptions◦ Cultivate second sources◦ Maintain extra inventory◦ Manufacturing facilities in alternate locations
Example: military supply chains
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Responsive supply chains ◦ Flexible in meeting changing needs of customers◦ Rely on accurate order information/mass
customization Example: Dell
Agile supply chains◦ Combination of risk hedging and responsive supply
chain strategies◦ Work with alternate suppliers on different technologies◦ Share resources with others in the industry◦ Flexible in mass customization
Example: Amazon
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Online Platforms
◦ Electronic hubs/exchanges◦ Allow for price-based competition◦ Useful for short-term transactions of commodity
products between businesses◦ May undermine the tenor of some relationships
E-procurement: a large Web-based marketplace encompassing many different vertical industries
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Reverse Auctions
Method of e-procurement 1.The seller bids for the rights to supply the buyer’s
purchasing needs2.The lowest price bid wins
Buyers: save on procurement costs for buyers Suppliers: engage in destructive price competition
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Supply Chain Management (SCM) Software
1. Includes more than procurement: manufacturing and distribution planning systems, forecasting, management modules, and more
2. Installed on local computers rather than on the Web.
More expensive than Web-based e-procurement
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Outsourcing Traditionally: production
Now: knowledge services
◦ fueled by the need to lower costs in a competitive, slow global economy
Offshoring
RFID (see Chapter 6)
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
The “Greening” of the Supply Chain Cut costs and gain a competitive advantage through
environmentally-friendly choices in:
◦ Product design
◦ Purchasing and materials sourcing
◦ Manufacturing processes managing toxins in production, waste, energy utilization, etc.
◦ Delivery transportation, waste in packaging
◦ E-waste and reverse logistics.
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Opening Vignette: Cisco Systems
Technology Expert: Cisco Systems
Technology Solution: Big Boda World Bikes
End-of-Book Case: TiVo, Xerox, Selco
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic,
mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Printed in the United States of America.