23
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. Chapter 8 Corporate Strategy: Vertical Integration and Diversification

Chapter 8 Corporate Strategy: Vertical Integration and Diversification

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Chapter 8 Corporate Strategy: Vertical Integration and Diversification. Chapter Outline. 8.1 What Is Corporate Strategy? 8.2 The Boundaries of the Firm Firms vs. Markets: Make or Buy? Alternatives on the Make-or-Buy Continuum 8.3 Vertical Integration along the Industry Value Chain - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Chapter 8 Corporate Strategy:  Vertical Integration and Diversification

Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

Chapter 8Corporate Strategy: Vertical Integration and Diversification

Page 2: Chapter 8 Corporate Strategy:  Vertical Integration and Diversification

8-2

Page 3: Chapter 8 Corporate Strategy:  Vertical Integration and Diversification

8-3

Chapter Outline8.1 What Is Corporate Strategy?

8.2 The Boundaries of the Firm • Firms vs. Markets: Make or Buy?

• Alternatives on the Make-or-Buy Continuum

8.3 Vertical Integration along the Industry Value Chain• Types of Vertical Integration

8.4 Corporate Diversification: Expanding Beyond a Single Market• Types of Corporate Diversification

• Leveraging Core Competencies for Corporate Diversification

• Corporate Diversification and Firm Performance

8.5 Implications for the Strategist

Page 4: Chapter 8 Corporate Strategy:  Vertical Integration and Diversification

8-4

ChapterCase 8

Refocusing GE: A Future of Clean-Tech and Health Care?

In 2008, more than half of GE’s profits came from GE Capital.

Global financial crisis hit the company hard. • Stock price fell from $42.12 to $6.66 in 17 months!

GE launched two strategic initiatives: 1. Ecomagination − clean-tech focus

2. Healthymagination – increase access and reduce costs of health care services

Also sold 51% of NBC to Comcast in 2011 and the rest in 2013.

Courtesy of GE Healthcare

Page 5: Chapter 8 Corporate Strategy:  Vertical Integration and Diversification

8-5

Corporate strategy determines the firm’s boundaries along three dimensions: 1. Industry value chain

2. Range of products and services

3. Where to compete: geography

Key strategic management concepts used here:• Core competencies – unique strengths

• Economies of scale – average cost per unit decreases

• Economies of scope – savings producing two (or more) outputs

• Transaction costs – all internal and external costs associated with an economic exchange

8.1 What Is Corporate Strategy?

CORPORATE-LEVEL STRATEGY

Page 6: Chapter 8 Corporate Strategy:  Vertical Integration and Diversification

8-6

Explains and predicts the scope of the firm• "Market vs. firms" have differential costs

External transaction costs• Costs associated with economic exchanges

Ex: negotiating and enforcing contracts

Internal transaction costs• Costs pertaining to organizing an exchange within a firm

Ex: recruiting & training employees

8.2 The Boundaries of the Firm

TRANSACTION COST ECONOMIES

Page 7: Chapter 8 Corporate Strategy:  Vertical Integration and Diversification

8-7

Exhibit 8.2 Organizing Economic Activity: Firms vs. Markets

Page 8: Chapter 8 Corporate Strategy:  Vertical Integration and Diversification

8-8

Principal – owner of the firm, i.e., shareholders Agent – manager performing activities on behalf of the

principal Separation of ownership and control – one of the hallmarks

of a publicly traded company Principal−agent problem is almost inevitable.

• A manager may pursue his or her own interests such as job security and managerial perks (e.g., corporate jets and golf outings that conflict with the principal’s goals – in particular, creating shareholder value)

• One potential way to overcome the principal−agent problem is to give stock options to managers, thus making them owners.

PRINCIPLE-AGENT RELATIONSHIP

Page 9: Chapter 8 Corporate Strategy:  Vertical Integration and Diversification

8-9

Short-term contacts• Competitive bidding process• Less than one-year term• Lower prices cost advantages

Strategic alliances• Facilitate investment without administrative costs

Ex: Long-term contacts, equity alliances, joint ventures

Parent–subsidiary relationship• Most integrated alternative • Parent companies have command and control

Ex: GM owns Opel and Vauxhall in Europe

Alternatives on the Make-or-Buy Continuum

Page 10: Chapter 8 Corporate Strategy:  Vertical Integration and Diversification

8-10

Strategy Highlight 8.1

Toyota Locks Up Lithium for Car Batteries World demand for lithium-ion batteries for cars• Grew from $278 million in ‘09 to $25 billion in 2014

Toyota wants to secure long-term supply to power its hybrid fleet of over 5 million hybrids sold.

Orocobre holds rights to a large lithium deposit.• Upfront investment to extract of lithium is very high.

To encourage investment, Toyota invested $120 million in an equity position.

Page 11: Chapter 8 Corporate Strategy:  Vertical Integration and Diversification

8-11

In what stages of the industry value chain should the firm participate?

Vertical integration• Ownership of its inputs, production, & outputs in the

value chain• Vertical value chain• Industry-level integration from upstream to downstream

Examples: cell phone industry value chain• Many different industries and firms

8.3 Vertical Integration along the Industry Value Chain

Page 12: Chapter 8 Corporate Strategy:  Vertical Integration and Diversification

8-12

Exhibit 8.5 HTC’s Backward and Forward Integration along the Industry Value Chain in

the Smartphone Industry

Page 13: Chapter 8 Corporate Strategy:  Vertical Integration and Diversification

8-13

Securing critical supplies Lowering costs & improving quality Facilitating investments in specialized assets

Increasing costs & reducing quality

Reducing flexibility

Increasing the potential for legal repercussions

Benefits and Risks of Vertical Integration

SOME BENEFITS OF VERTICAL INTEGRATION

SOME RISKS OF VERTICAL INTEGRATION

Page 14: Chapter 8 Corporate Strategy:  Vertical Integration and Diversification

8-14

Exhibit 8.6 Taper Integration along the Industry Value Chain

Page 15: Chapter 8 Corporate Strategy:  Vertical Integration and Diversification

8-15

Degrees of diversification• Range of products and services a firm should offer

Ex: PepsiCo also owns Lay's & Quaker Oats, but sold off KFCDifferences in corporate strategy between KFC & Chick-fil-A

Diversification strategies• Product diversification

Active in several different product categories

• Geographic diversificationActive in several different countries

• Product–market diversificationActive in a range of both products and countries

8.4 Corporate Diversification: Expanding Beyond a Single Market

SECOND CORPORATE STRATEGY QUESTION

Page 16: Chapter 8 Corporate Strategy:  Vertical Integration and Diversification

8-16

Single-business firm derives >95% from one business Google revenues from online search

Dominant-business firm 70% to 95% from one businessHarley-Davidson yields 10% revenues from clothing

Related diversification strategy <70% from one business• Related-constrained – leverage current competencies

ExxonMobil strategic move into natural gas

• Related-linked – share only limited links to current businessAmazon move into cloud computing, Kindle tablets, & video

streaming

Unrelated diversification <70% and few if any links among businesses (a conglomerate)

GE, LG, Tata

Types of Corporate Diversification

Page 17: Chapter 8 Corporate Strategy:  Vertical Integration and Diversification

8-17

Strategy Highlight 8.2

The Tata Group: Integration at the Corporate Level

Tata Group of India founded in 1868 – uses unrelated diversification • Tea, hospitality, steel, IT, power, and automobiles • 500,000 employees and $100 billion in annual revenues

Tata Motors• The luxury division with the Jaguar and Land Rover brands

focused differentiation strategy for developed markets

• The Nano car division with the Tata Nano brand Focused cost-leadership strategy for emerging markets Targets non-consumers moving up from mopeds and bicycles

Page 18: Chapter 8 Corporate Strategy:  Vertical Integration and Diversification

8-18

Exhibit 8.8 The Core Competence-Market Matrix

Page 19: Chapter 8 Corporate Strategy:  Vertical Integration and Diversification

8-19

Does corporate diversification lead to superior performance?

The critical question to ask:• Are the individual businesses worth more under the

company’s management than if each were managed in separate firms?

Research finds an inverted U-shaped relationship• Type of diversification

• Overall firm performance

Corporate Diversification and Firm Performance

Page 20: Chapter 8 Corporate Strategy:  Vertical Integration and Diversification

8-20

Exhibit 8.11 Restructuring the Corporate Portfolio: The Boston Consulting

Group Growth-Share Matrix

Page 21: Chapter 8 Corporate Strategy:  Vertical Integration and Diversification

8-21

8.5 Implications for the Strategist

Effective corporate strategy helps to gain and sustain a competitive advantage.

Corporate strategy needs to be dynamic over time. • GE CEO Jeffrey Immelt formulated a new corporate

strategy in clean-tech and health care. (ChapterCase 8)

• Strategic positions of Nike and adidas another exampleadidas founded in 1924 focused on athletic shoes

Integrated manufacturing model

Globalization led adidas to less integration and wider sports apparel 2013 − 40% shoes, 50% apparel, 10% equipment

Nike started in 1978 as a vertically disintegrated firm.

Page 22: Chapter 8 Corporate Strategy:  Vertical Integration and Diversification

8-22

ChapterCase 8

Consider This…• 2012 – GE split the energy business into three SBUs: Power

and Water; Oil and Gas; and Energy Management.This move has both internal and external benefits.

• GE increasing its global footprintInternational sales were 19% in 1980; to over 52% in 2012.Tackling big problems isa strength for a conglomerate.

• India is seeking to replicate a “leap frog” approach in energy similar to that used in telecommunications.Challenges for firms based in developed economiesNeed robust solutions yet very economical

Courtesy of GE Healthcare

Page 23: Chapter 8 Corporate Strategy:  Vertical Integration and Diversification

8-23