Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
RPS V4 - 2012 Part 11 – Planning Scheme Policy 3 Contributions and Security Bonding – Chapter 8 - Page 1
1
Chapter 8 – Framework for Infrastructure Contributions (Stormwater – Mainland) 3.8.1 Purpose (1) The purpose of this Policy is to implement an equitable developer contributions scheme for the
trunk stormwater network servicing the mainland of Redland Shire. The contributions will be used to fund new and improved infrastructure needed to manage future growth on the Shire’s mainland.
3.8.1.1 Nature and Intention of Planning Scheme Policy (1) This planning scheme policy sets the basis for infrastructure contributions for trunk stormwater
infrastructure for Redland Shire. The policy provides the basis for the contributions. (2) A new Priority Infrastructure Plan and related Infrastructure Charges Schedule will ultimately be
adopted and form the basis for infrastructure provision. In the interim, this Chapter 8 of Planning Scheme Policy 3, Stormwater – Mainland, will be the basis for receiving contributions towards trunk stormwater infrastructure needed to service growth within the Shire.
3.8.1.2 Nature of Development to which Policy applies and triggers (1) This planning scheme policy applies to applications for material change of use and
reconfiguration of a lot on the mainland in Redland Shire. 3.8.2 Background 3.8.2.1 The Need for Stormwater Infrastructure (1) Strong growth is expected to continue in Redland Shire creating an increasing demand on trunk
stormwater and other infrastructure. To cater for this growth, and to ensure the mainland within the Shire have an effective trunk stormwater network with the capacity to cater for daily demands, continued upgrades to the network will be required.
(2) Development required to accommodate ongoing population growth typically results in increased
quantity of stormwater runoff and pollutants loadings to waterways. Stormwater infrastructure is required to manage runoff quantities and quality and help protect the natural waterways, including Moreton Bay.
3.8.2.2 Adoption Date and Superseded Policies (1) Applications received on or after the adoption date will be required to pay a contribution in
accordance with the Planning Scheme Policy 3 –Contributions and Security Bonding, Chapter 8, Stormwater - Mainland).
(2) The Infrastructure Contribution will not be applied to
a. A properly made application received prior to the adoption date; or b. An application which has received a Development Permit or Preliminary Approval prior to the
adoption date in respect of one or more of the following;
Concurrent Material Change of Use and Reconfiguration; Material Change of Use; Reconfiguration.
Page 2 - Part 11 – Planning Scheme Policy 3 Contributions and Security Bonding – Chapter 8 RPS V4 – 2012
3.8.3 Network Planning Assumptions 3.8.3.1 Definition of Infrastructure Covered by Policy (1) The trunk stormwater infrastructure items covered by this policy include:
infrastructure required for stormwater quality management; infrastructure required for stormwater quantity management; and waterway enhancement works.
The trunk infrastructure items are listed in Table 1.
Table 1 Stormwater (Open Waterways) Infrastructure Items
Quality Wetlands Bioretention Systems
Quantity Land Acquisition Flood Mitigation / Levees Erosion Protection
Waterway Enhancement Rehabilitation
3.8.3.2 Stormwater – Desired Standards of Service 3.8.3.3 Objectives and Design Philosophy (1) The objectives and design philosophy of the trunk infrastructure within this policy is consistent
with ‘Objectives and Design Philosophy’ as detailed in Queensland Urban Drainage Manual (QUDM) Section 2.
3.8.3.4 Stormwater Quantity Management (1) Stormwater drainage systems shall be designed in accordance with Redland Planning Scheme
Policy 9 Chapter 6 – Stormwater Management, QUDM Section 5 and Australian Rainfall and Runoff (AR&R) 1997 unless otherwise specified.
(2) When calculating stormwater runoff flow rates the acceptable methods are described in Redland
Planning Scheme Policy 9 Chapter 6 – Stormwater Management, ARR 1997 and QUDM Section 5 unless otherwise specified.
(3) Intensity Frequency Duration (IFD) tables are to be created using methods outlined in AR&R
1997. (4) The design criteria for the major and minor drainage system must satisfy the criteria detailed in
QUDM Section 5.08. (5) The recommended Design Average Recurrence Interval for Major System Infrastructure is 100-
years. NOTE: where QUDM and the RSC requirements differ, the RSC requirements take precedence.
RPS V4 - 2012 Part 11 – Planning Scheme Policy 3 Contributions and Security Bonding – Chapter 8 - Page 3
3
3.8.3.5 Stormwater Quality Management (1) For the construction phase, the standard of service must comply with the Soil Erosion and
Sediment Control - Engineering Guidelines for Queensland Construction Sites (Queensland Division of the Institution of Engineers Australia, June 1996).
(2) For the operational phase, stormwater runoff treatment must be provided to achieve the water
quality objectives stated in “Redland Shire Council Water Quality Objectives”. These water quality objectives depend on the specific location of the proposed trunk infrastructure.
(3) The stormwater runoff treatment measures can be comprised of traditional engineering methods
or incorporate elements from Water Sensitive Urban Design (WSUD). The following references can be used in the design of the treatment measures:
Australia Runoff Quality, 2004, Institute of Engineers Australia, and Water Sensitive Urban Design Engineering Guidelines: Stormwater, 2004, Brisbane City
Council. 3.8.3.6 Waterway Enhancement (1) Enhancement such as rehabilitation, re-vegetation and stabilisation of the riparian zone is to be
undertaken in accordance with Redlands Planning Scheme Policy 14 – Waterways, Wetlands and Moreton Bay which identifies two main areas of the riparian zone as identified in Redlands Planning Scheme Part 5 - Overlays, Division 12 - Waterways, Wetlands and Moreton Bay Overlay (refer to Table 1);
The core riparian area (40m either side of waterway); The outer core riparian area.
(2) Re-vegetation is to be undertaken using native species complying with the standards outlined in
Redlands Planning Scheme Policy 4- Ecological Impacts, Section 4.11. (3) Works undertaken on bed and bank stabilisation including erosion protection are to provide
habitat enhancement, adopt soft engineering approaches and follow, as a minimum, the standards outlined in Redlands Planning Scheme Policy 14 – Waterways, Wetlands and Moreton Bay.
3.8.3.7 Growth Assumptions (1) Growth assumptions used for this planning scheme policy are those population and household
growth rates prepared for Redland Shire Council’s Priority Infrastructure Plan, Table 3.
Page 4 - Part 11 – Planning Scheme Policy 3 Contributions and Security Bonding – Chapter 8 RPS V4 – 2012
Hou
seh
old
s
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
20
14
20
15
20
16
20
17
20
18
20
19
20
20
20
21
Ale
xand
ra H
ills
5,95
1
5,95
9
5,96
7
5,97
5
5,98
4
5,99
2
6,00
0
6,00
8
6,02
1
6,03
4
6,04
6
6,05
9
6,07
2
6,07
6
6,08
0
6,08
5
6,08
9
6,09
3
Bir
kdal
e4,
888
4,95
0
5,01
2
5,07
4
5,13
7
5,20
0
5,26
3
5,32
6
5,42
0
5,51
4
5,60
9
5,70
4
5,80
0
5,86
9
5,93
8
6,00
8
6,07
8
6,14
9
Cap
alab
a6,
290
6,39
0
6,49
2
6,59
4
6,69
7
6,80
1
6,90
6
7,01
2
7,16
2
7,31
4
7,46
7
7,62
2
7,77
9
7,86
5
7,95
3
8,04
1
8,13
0
8,21
9
Cle
vela
nd5,
661
5,74
0
5,81
9
5,90
0
5,98
1
6,06
2
6,14
5
6,22
8
6,36
0
6,49
3
6,62
7
6,76
3
6,89
9
6,93
8
6,97
7
7,01
7
7,05
6
7,09
6
Orm
isto
n2,
106
2,13
0
2,15
4
2,17
9
2,20
3
2,22
7
2,25
2
2,27
6
2,33
8
2,40
0
2,46
2
2,52
4
2,58
6
2,64
4
2,70
3
2,76
3
2,82
4
2,88
6
Red
land
Bay
3,49
2
3,70
1
3,91
1
4,12
1
4,33
1
4,54
2
4,75
2
4,96
3
5,28
9
5,61
5
5,94
1
6,26
8
6,59
5
6,81
7
7,03
9
7,26
2
7,48
4
7,70
7
She
ldon
-Mt
Cot
ton
1,61
4
1,69
3
1,77
1
1,85
0
1,92
8
2,00
6
2,08
4
2,16
2
2,30
0
2,43
9
2,57
9
2,71
9
2,86
1
3,00
9
3,15
6
3,30
3
3,45
0
3,59
7
Thor
nesi
de1,
489
1,50
0
1,51
1
1,52
3
1,53
4
1,54
6
1,55
7
1,56
9
1,58
5
1,60
0
1,61
5
1,63
1
1,64
6
1,64
7
1,64
7
1,64
8
1,64
8
1,64
9
Thor
nlan
ds3,
341
3,52
2
3,70
5
3,89
0
4,07
8
4,26
7
4,45
9
4,65
3
4,93
5
5,21
8
5,50
2
5,78
7
6,07
2
6,31
6
6,57
0
6,83
5
7,11
1
7,40
0
Vic
tori
a Po
int
4,92
3
5,03
2
5,14
2
5,25
2
5,36
4
5,47
6
5,58
9
5,70
3
5,89
1
6,08
1
6,27
3
6,46
7
6,66
2
6,67
3
6,68
4
6,69
5
6,70
6
6,71
7
Wel
lingt
on P
oint
3,57
3
3,64
2
3,71
1
3,78
0
3,85
0
3,91
9
3,99
0
4,06
0
4,16
1
4,26
3
4,36
5
4,46
8
4,57
1
4,61
2
4,65
3
4,69
4
4,73
6
4,77
8
The
Bay
Isl
ands
3,15
3
3,21
2
3,27
1
3,33
0
3,38
8
3,44
5
3,50
2
3,55
9
3,61
6
3,67
2
3,72
8
3,78
4
3,83
9
3,89
5
3,95
2
4,00
7
4,06
3
4,11
8
46,4
81
47,4
72
48,4
67
49,4
68
50,4
73
51,4
83
52,4
98
53,5
19
55,0
77
56,6
43
58,2
15
59,7
95
61,3
82
62,3
62
63,3
54
64,3
58
65,3
77
66,4
09
Com
mu
nit
y O
f In
tere
st
Tab
le 2
H
ou
seh
old
Gro
wth
Rat
es –
Red
lan
d S
hir
e C
ou
nci
l
Po
pu
lati
on
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
20
14
20
15
20
16
20
17
20
18
20
19
20
20
20
21
Ale
xand
ra H
ills
17,6
92
17,7
15
17,7
38
17,7
61
17,7
83
17,8
06
17,8
29
17,8
52
17,8
84
17,9
16
17,9
49
17,9
81
18,0
13
18,0
20
18,0
26
18,0
33
18,0
39
18,0
46
Bir
kdal
e14
,440
14,5
95
14,7
49
14,9
04
15,0
58
15,2
13
15,3
67
15,5
22
15,7
62
16,0
02
16,2
41
16,4
81
16,7
21
16,8
66
17,0
11
17,1
55
17,3
00
17,4
45
Cap
alab
a17
,799
18,0
05
18,2
12
18,4
18
18,6
24
18,8
30
19,0
37
19,2
43
19,5
55
19,8
67
20,1
79
20,4
91
20,8
03
20,9
52
21,1
00
21,2
49
21,3
97
21,5
46
Cle
vela
nd13
,889
14,0
18
14,1
48
14,2
77
14,4
06
14,5
35
14,6
65
14,7
94
15,0
49
15,3
04
15,5
60
15,8
15
16,0
70
16,1
20
16,1
70
16,2
20
16,2
70
16,3
20
Orm
isto
n5,
669
5,72
7
5,78
6
5,84
4
5,90
3
5,96
1
6,02
0
6,07
8
6,23
9
6,39
9
6,56
0
6,72
0
6,88
1
6,98
7
7,09
3
7,20
0
7,30
6
7,41
2
Red
land
Bay
9,53
5
10,1
02
10,6
68
11,2
35
11,8
01
12,3
68
12,9
34
13,5
01
14,3
79
15,2
57
16,1
35
17,0
13
17,8
91
18,4
89
19,0
87
19,6
85
20,2
83
20,8
81
She
ldon
-Mt
Cot
ton
4,93
5
5,18
2
5,42
9
5,67
6
5,92
4
6,17
1
6,41
8
6,66
5
7,06
6
7,46
7
7,86
7
8,26
8
8,66
9
9,12
1
9,57
3
10,0
25
10,4
77
10,9
29
Thor
nesi
de3,
496
3,50
3
3,51
0
3,51
7
3,52
4
3,53
1
3,53
8
3,54
5
3,59
1
3,63
7
3,68
2
3,72
8
3,77
4
3,78
6
3,79
9
3,81
1
3,82
4
3,83
6
Thor
nlan
ds9,
695
10,1
62
10,6
28
11,0
95
11,5
62
12,0
29
12,4
95
12,9
62
13,7
31
14,5
00
15,2
69
16,0
38
16,8
07
17,1
35
17,4
64
17,7
92
18,1
21
18,4
49
Vic
tori
a Po
int
13,6
74
13,9
24
14,1
74
14,4
24
14,6
73
14,9
23
15,1
73
15,4
23
15,8
60
16,2
97
16,7
35
17,1
72
17,6
09
17,6
96
17,7
84
17,8
71
17,9
58
18,0
45
Wel
lingt
on P
oint
10,1
96
10,3
70
10,5
44
10,7
18
10,8
93
11,0
67
11,2
41
11,4
15
11,6
66
11,9
17
12,1
69
12,4
20
12,6
71
12,7
42
12,8
14
12,8
85
12,9
56
13,0
27
The
Bay
Isl
ands
6,75
7
6,91
3
7,07
0
7,22
6
7,38
2
7,53
8
7,69
5
7,85
1
8,00
1
8,15
1
8,30
1
8,45
1
8,60
1
8,75
3
8,90
5
9,05
7
9,20
9
9,36
1
Tota
l12
7,77
7
130,
216
13
2,65
5
135,
094
13
7,53
4
139,
973
14
2,41
2
144,
851
14
8,78
3
152,
715
15
6,64
7
160,
579
16
4,51
0
166,
668
16
8,82
5
170,
982
17
3,14
0
175,
297
Com
mu
nit
y O
f In
tere
st
Tab
le 2
P
op
ula
tio
n G
row
th R
ates
– R
edla
nd
Sh
ire
Co
un
cil
RPS V4 - 2012 Part 11 – Planning Scheme Policy 3 Contributions and Security Bonding – Chapter 8 - Page 5
3.8.4 Process for Determining Developer Contributions 3.8.4.1 Procedures Used to Calculate Stormwater Infrastructure Charges on the Mainland (1) The adopted stormwater infrastructure contributions scheme is based on charging new
developments on the mainland the shared cost of Council’s planned program of trunk stormwater infrastructure upgrading through to the year 2021. The trunk infrastructure elements are identified in the Plans for Trunk Infrastructure, included in Appendix A.
(2) The charges presented do not cover the cost of providing a new development with access to the
trunk stormwater infrastructure network. The cost of providing such access is a cost borne by the developer.
(3) The process used to calculate Trunk Stormwater Infrastructure Contributions for new
developments on the mainland of the Shire is detailed below. 3.8.4.2 Determination of Infrastructure Costs for each Catchment (1) The total costs of stormwater infrastructure, which meets the desired standards of service for both
quantity and quality management, has been calculated for each catchment on the mainland within the Priority Infrastructure Area, and is shown below in Table 4.
Table 4 Total Infrastructure Costs by Catchment
Catchment Total Cost ($)
Cleveland 30 022 000
Eprapah Creek 34 805 000
Hilliards Creek 21 045 980
Lower Tingalpa & Coolnwynpin Creek 50 445 000
Moogurrapum Creek 15 495 000
Native Dog Creek 10 744 000
Serpentine Creek 11 591 000
Southern Redland Bay 10 257 000
Tarradarrapin Creek 32 505 000
Thornlands 19 103 000
TOTALS 236 012 980
3.8.4.3 Apportionment of Costs Across Land Use Categories (1) The cost contribution for each land use was calculated by the most applicable procedure to fairly
allocate cost based on impact and infrastructure requirement. The characteristics of increased quantity of runoff are best associated with the increased impervious area occurring in the development. The proposed future land use zoning characteristics of the Shire, as outlined in Master Zoning Document Reference, have a typical fraction impervious value associated with them, as listed in Redland Planning Scheme Part 11 - Planning Scheme Policy 9 – Infrastructure Works – Chapter 6. These fraction impervious values were adopted for the assessment of quantity impacts, as listed in Table 5.
(2) Public open space land use categories (i.e. Open Space, Environmental Protection and
Conservation) were included for defining the Water Quality Objectives, but excluded for the distribution of infrastructure contribution charges. The cost of treatment for pollutant load
Page 6 - Part 11 – Planning Scheme Policy 3 Contributions and Security Bonding – Chapter 8 RPS V4 – 2012
reduction from these land use zones were shared evenly across all other land use categories within each catchment. It reflects Redland Shire Council’s water quality objectives of pollutant load reductions within waterways that does not discriminate by the source of the pollutants. This does not occur for quantity mitigation requirements, as the fraction impervious value of public open space is nil, hence no quantity impacts arise from its land use.
Table 5 Land use Characteristics
Land Use Category Fraction Impervious (Fi)
Commercial Industry 0.90
Community Purposes 0.90
Conservation 0
District Centre 1.0
Emerging Urban Community 0.45
Environmental Protection 0
General Industry 0.90
Investigation Zone 0.45
Local Centre 1.0
Low Density Residential 0.30
Major Centre 1.0
Marine Activity 0.90
Medium Density Residential 0.80
Neighbourhood Centre 0.90
Open Space 0
Park Residential 0.20
Rural Non-Urban 0.05
Urban Residential 0.45
3.8.4.4 Use of Fraction Impervious to Apportion Costs by Land Use (1) The basis of apportioning costs for works required to address trunk stormwater is the impervious
area for each land use. The total treatment cost for each catchment within the Priority Infrastructure Area was apportioned across the total impervious area within each catchment.
(2) The contribution for stormwater quantity and quality management infrastructure per impervious
hectare for Urban Residential Land is provided in Table 6. To calculate the contribution payable for various land use types, refer to Section 3.8.7 Calculating Infrastructure Contributions.
RPS V4 - 2012 Part 11 – Planning Scheme Policy 3 Contributions and Security Bonding – Chapter 8 - Page 7
Table 6 Stormwater Contribution per Impervious Hectare for Urban Residential Land
Catchment Contribution per Ha ($)
Cleveland 65,780
Eprapah Creek 45,049
Hilliards Creek 31,412
Lower Tingalpa and Coolnwynpin Creek 52,994
Moogurrapum Creek 49,347
Native Dog Creek 67,003
Southern Redland Bay 45,969
Serpentine Creek 53,885
Tarradarrapin Creek 62,462
Thornlands 63,550
3.8.4.5 Indexation (1) Developer contribution rates for stormwater infrastructure are in August 2006 dollars. Land
required for waterway corridors and infrastructure construction costs have been included in the Stormwater Infrastructure Contribution. Contributions payable shall be at the rate applicable at the time of payment. The Stormwater Infrastructure Contribution will be indexed on 1st July each year by the Australian Bureau of Statistics Road and Bridge Construction Index.
3.8.4.6 Subsidies and Grants (1) Any subsidies or grants that could be identified at the time of the planning for the Plans for Trunk
Infrastructure have been removed from the overall cost of facilities. 3.8.4.7 Creditable Contributions (1) Generally and at its discretion, Council will seek either a financial contribution based on the above
charge rates, works or land in lieu in accordance with the Infrastructure Contribution Schedule (refer Appendix A) and individual infrastructure agreements.
(2) Where a condition of development approval (imposed by Council) requires the applicant to
undertake works or dedicate land which are identified as part of the infrastructure charges schedule it is appropriate for the Council to offset the agreed costs of such works or land from the Stormwater Infrastructure Charge contribution. The value of such works will need to be agreed by Council prior to works commencing and will need to be documented in an Infrastructure Agreement.
(3) Credit may be sought for previous stormwater infrastructure charges attached to a parcel of land
where conclusive documentation is presented to Council that detail: How and the extent to which the previous charges or works complies with requirements of
the Infrastructure Charges Schedule; The date the previous charges works was dedicated to Council; The lawful development potential and actual development that accompanied the charges for
works; and A breakdown of credit per lot for each lot that resulted from a previous residential material
change in use or reconfiguring of a lot for which credit is sought.
Page 8 - Part 11 – Planning Scheme Policy 3 Contributions and Security Bonding – Chapter 8 RPS V4 – 2012
(4) An existing use has a credit value as stated in Tables 5, 6 and 7. 3.8.5 Charge Areas 3.8.5.1 Definition of Charge Areas, (1) The mainland stormwater contribution will apply to all development on the mainland within the
Priority Infrastructure Area that is serviced by the trunk stormwater network. 3.8.5.2 Master Planned Communities and Infrastructure Agreement Areas (1) Existing Infrastructure Agreements are not subject to this policy. (2) All Community Title Schemes or similar development will be charged in accordance with the rates
in Table 8. 3.8.6 Cost and Timing of Infrastructure (1) Details regarding cost and timing of infrastructure can be found in supporting documents - Refer
to Infrastructure Charges Schedule in Appendix A. 3.8.7 Calculating Infrastructure Contributions (1) The process for determining the stormwater infrastructure contribution for different development
types on the mainland and within the Priority Infrastructure Area is outlined below. (2) Step 1: From Table 5, determine the fraction impervious for each proposed land use in the
development. (3) Step 2: From Table 5, determine the fraction impervious for each existing land use in the
development. (4) Step 3: For each proposed land use, determine the net fraction impervious by subtracting the
existing impervious area determined in step 2 from the proposed impervious area determined in step 1.
(5) Step 4: Divide the net fraction impervious determined in step 3 by 0.45. (This converts the
fraction impervious to an equivalent urban residential land value) (6) Step 5: Determine the developable land area for each proposed land use type (in hectares). (7) Step 6: From Table 6, determine the contribution per ha for the appropriate catchment. (8) Step 7: Determine the contribution payable by multiplying the equivalent impervious value
determined in step 4 by the developable land area determined in step 5 by the charge per hectare determined in step 6.
Note: If there is a discrepancy between the nature of development proposed and the land use zone in which it is proposed, Council will determine the charge rate to be applied. 3.8.8 Terms and Definitions “DSS” Means the Desired Standard of Service “ICS” Means Infrastructure Charges Schedule “Dedication [of land]” Means the transfer of land to Council in fee simple.
RPS V4 - 2012 Part 11 – Planning Scheme Policy 3 Contributions and Security Bonding – Chapter 8 - Page 9
“Minor Drainage System” Means that part of the overall stormwater drainage system which controls flows from the minor design storm eg. kerb and channel, inlets, underground drainage etc. for the purposes of providing pedestrian safety, convenience and vehicle access. “Trunk Stormwater System” Means that part of the overall stormwater drainage system (including natural flow paths and creeks) which controls flow greater than those controlled by the minor drainage system. The trunk stormwater system excludes street flows not contained in the minor system. “Lot” A separate distinct parcel of land created on the registration on a plan of subdivision, under the land title act 1994. “Fraction Impervious” Proportion of site impervious to stormwater infiltration for different land use categories “Access” Means connection of individual developments to the trunk stormwater network. 3.8.9 Appendices Appendix A – Infrastructure Charges Schedule. Appendix B – Maps of existing and future infrastructure
Page 10 - Part 11 – Planning Scheme Policy 3 Contributions and Security Bonding – Chapter 8 RPS V4 – 2012
Appendix A – Stormwater Infrastructure
RPS V4 - 2012 Part 11 – Planning Scheme Policy 3 Contributions and Security Bonding – Chapter 8 - Page 11
Page 12 - Part 11 – Planning Scheme Policy 3 Contributions and Security Bonding – Chapter 8 RPS V4 – 2012
RPS V4 - 2012 Part 11 – Planning Scheme Policy 3 Contributions and Security Bonding – Chapter 8 - Page 13
Page 14 - Part 11 – Planning Scheme Policy 3 Contributions and Security Bonding – Chapter 8 RPS V4 – 2012
RPS V4 - 2012 Part 11 – Planning Scheme Policy 3 Contributions and Security Bonding – Chapter 8 - Page 15
Page 16 - Part 11 – Planning Scheme Policy 3 Contributions and Security Bonding – Chapter 8 RPS V4 – 2012
RPS V4 - 2012 Part 11 – Planning Scheme Policy 3 Contributions and Security Bonding – Chapter 8 - Page 17
Page 18 - Part 11 – Planning Scheme Policy 3 Contributions and Security Bonding – Chapter 8 RPS V4 – 2012
Appendix B – Stormwater Infrastructure
RPS V4 - 2012 Part 11 – Planning Scheme Policy 3 Contributions and Security Bonding – Chapter 8 - Page 19
Page 20 - Part 11 – Planning Scheme Policy 3 Contributions and Security Bonding – Chapter 8 RPS V4 – 2012
RPS V4 - 2012 Part 11 – Planning Scheme Policy 3 Contributions and Security Bonding – Chapter 8 - Page 21
Page 22 - Part 11 – Planning Scheme Policy 3 Contributions and Security Bonding – Chapter 8 RPS V4 – 2012
RPS V4 - 2012 Part 11 – Planning Scheme Policy 3 Contributions and Security Bonding – Chapter 8 - Page 23
Page 24 - Part 11 – Planning Scheme Policy 3 Contributions and Security Bonding – Chapter 8 RPS V4 – 2012
