Upload
reese-norman
View
44
Download
7
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Chapter 53: Community Ecology. Trophic Structure, Predation, and Competition. Biological Community. Assemblage of populations of various species living close enough for potential interaction. Interspecific interactions:. Symbiosis. Competition. Disease. Herbivory. Predation. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Chapter 53: Community Ecology
Chapter 53: Community Ecology
Trophic Structure, Predation, and Competition
Trophic Structure, Predation, and Competition
Assemblage of populations of various Assemblage of populations of various species living close enough for potential species living close enough for potential
interaction interaction
SymbiosisPredation
Competition Herbivory
Disease
+/- interaction; predator kills & eats prey
+/- interaction; herbivore eats plant, kills it
PredatorPrey Have senses
that enable them to locate prey
Self-defense mechanisms: camouflage, bright coloration, mimicry
Herbivore
PlantHave special sensors to recognize appropriate food
Chemical weapons/thorns protect them
+/- interaction; one organism (parasite) gets nourishment from other organism (host), which is harmed
endoparasite
Live within host’s body
ectoparasiteparasitoidism
Feed on external surface of host
Insect lays eggs in/on living host, leaving the larvae to feed on body, and kill it
Inflict lethal harm, can limit populations
Pathogen: disease-causing agent; unlike parasite: microscopic, lethal; +/- interaction
+/+ interaction; both species help each other
+/0 interaction; 1 species benefits, & the other is not affected; hard to find true example in nature
Total # of different species
Variety of diff. kinds of organisms that make up the community
Proportion each species represents of total individuals in the community
Feeding relationships between organismsFeeding relationships between organisms Food
Chain:
Eventually to decomposers
Energetic Hypothesis: length of food chain is limited by inefficiency of energy transfer along chain Dynamic Stability Hypothesis: long food chains are less stable than short food chains; population fluctuations at lower levels are more profound at higher levels, causing potential extinction of high level predators
Food Web: food chains are linked together; 1 species, such as plant, is eaten by several species
Biomass: total mass of all individuals in a populationDominant
species
Species that: collectively have highest biomass OR most abundant
Keystone species Not necessarily abundant;
exert strong control on community by their ecological roles
Ecosystem engineers
“foundation species”; facilitators; cause physical changes that benefit community, by increasing survival and reproduction
Mineral nutrients control community organization; nutrients control plant #’s, which control herbivore #’s, which control predator #’s
Predation controls community organization; predators control herbivores, which control plants, which control nutrient levels
Model of community organization
Fish Abundant Rare
Zooplankton Rare Abundant
Algae Abundant Rare
Biomanipulation
Polluted State
Restored State
Primary Succession: occurs in virtually lifeless area, with no organisms or soil; only autotrophic prokaryotes are presentSecondary Succession: occurs where an existing community was cleared by disturbance, that leaves soil intact; first plants to recolonize: grow from wind-blown/animal-borne seeds
Geographic Location Size
Tropical habitats have the most species; tropical habitats are older (long growing season), and greatest evapotranspiration
Greater area=more diverse habitats, more species
New Species Immigration Rate
Species Extinction Rate
Influenced By:
Island Size Island’s
Distance from Mainland
# of Species Already Present
new colonizers: unlikely to reach small island = low immigration rate, high extinction rate (less resources)
Islands near mainland: high immigration rate, low extinction rate (new colonizers sustain presence of species)
# Species
Extinction rate (competitive exclusion)
immigration rate (those reaching island are less likely to represent species not already there)
States that species are found in the same area simply because they happen to have similar abiotic requirements
Integrated Hypothesis (Clements)
Individualistic Hypothesis (Gleason)
Describes a community as an assemblage of closely linked species, locked into association by mandatory biotic interactions
These interactions cause the community to function as an integrated unit
**Walker agrees with Gleason
Rivet Model Redundancy ModelSuggests: most of the species in a community are associated tightly with particular other species in a web of life
**the Ehrlich’s agree with Clements
Exact opposite of the rivet model
Suggests: species in a community are redundant; species operate independently, & aren’t affected if one species increases/decreasesEx. – if one pollinator disappears, then another species will do the job
DDT and other toxins, when in tissues and fats of an organism, can accumulate and be passed onto the next level of the food chain, affecting many organisms. Rachel Carson states in Silent Spring that the concentration of DDT in a low level organism’s fat is a lot lower than that of a higher level organism on the food chain
If phytoplankton is infected
Zooplankton & other primary consumers, secondary consumers, etc. are affected
Everything occurring at low food chain levels is magnified at high food chain levels, causing possible extinction of top level predators
Similar effect of DDT; If organism is affected by pollution, it can spread through food chain, greatly affecting top-level predators
If water is polluted and filled with garbage, the fish living there drink bad water and aren’t
getting the right nutrientsMake fish sick, and all those who eat them: fish’s predators, fish’s predators’ predators, and even
human who eat fish for dinner
**If one organism is infected by either DDT, pollution, or by several other possibilities, the harms done to
that animal certainly don‘t stop there**
The spraying will cover the soil and the nutrients it contains.
•The producers absorb the DDT and are eaten by the consumers.
•The predators will continue to consume the DDT laden prey, accumulating the DDT in their body fats.
imbalance of predators to prey will cause the ecosystem to go out of balance
DDT Impacts Predation
The reduction of 4th level predators, for example, will cause:
overabundance of the 3rd level prey, which consume so much 2nd level prey
Decrease 2nd level prey, so there’s not as many organisms to eat primary producers
As the environment becomes increasingly warmer each year, organisms might not be able to adapt or migrate to other areas
The introduction of organisms disrupts and changes the ecosystem of the environment.
This migration will bring new predators and new prey, which would alter the trophic structure.
Altering the trophic structure would change the predator-prey relationships; the top level carnivores may not be the top level carnivores anymore, having an effect like the top-down model
Effects of Global Warming on Predation
If organisms die, their predators would starve, and there would be an increase in the dying organisms’ prey
DDT Affects Competition
• DDT can increase competitionDDT may kill many organisms of a
species that two other species compete for.
Because the resource is in short supply, interspecific competition between the two competing species will increase, hurting both species
eventually eliminating one of the two competing species (competitive exclusion).
•DDT can also lessen competitionBiological Magnification
DDT’s concentration with each link in the food chain. By eating DDT-contaminated food, DDT accumulates in carnivores, which may be enough to kill the carnivores.
Reproduction RatesDDT influences reproduction ratesEx.: Eagles in Silent Spring by
Rachel Carson-DDT stored in eagles’ fatty cells
cause the deposition of calcium in their eggshells to be hindered.
DDT Affects Competition
less competition among remaining
carnivores for resources.
Less carnivores; some organisms’ populations from lower trophic levels (top-down model), providing more of those organisms for the surviving carnivores (more food for them).
Weak eggs, so many parent eagles accidentally crushed the egg during incubation; some eggs also didn’t hatch eagle population; the population of eagles’ prey increased, so competition for those prey isn’t as intense.
Global Warming’s Impact on Competition
Some organisms may not be able to adapt fast enough to the rapidly changing conditions of the world
Species may become extinct; its predators may starve/be eliminated & its prey is more abundant
Some organisms may adapt well to the new conditions caused by global warming
Have edge over other species to get resources, reproduce rapidly; lead to local elimination of interior competitor (not able to obtain resources)
Survivors reproduce, pass genes onto offspring; over evolutionary time, may evolve to new species
If species is extinct or adapts, a competitor is still eliminated, leading to less competition for resources
A.P. Biology Pd. A9/15/08