19
Chapter 5: CPU Scheduling Chapter 5: CPU Scheduling

Chapter 5: CPU Scheduling

  • Upload
    sol

  • View
    28

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Chapter 5: CPU Scheduling. Chapter 5: CPU Scheduling. Basic Concepts Scheduling Criteria Scheduling Algorithms Multiple-Processor Scheduling Real-Time Scheduling Thread Scheduling Operating Systems Examples Java Thread Scheduling Algorithm Evaluation. Basic Concepts. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Chapter 5:  CPU Scheduling

Chapter 5: CPU SchedulingChapter 5: CPU Scheduling

Page 2: Chapter 5:  CPU Scheduling

5.2 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts – 7th Edition, Feb 2, 2005

Chapter 5: CPU SchedulingChapter 5: CPU Scheduling

Basic Concepts

Scheduling Criteria

Scheduling Algorithms

Multiple-Processor Scheduling

Real-Time Scheduling

Thread Scheduling

Operating Systems Examples

Java Thread Scheduling

Algorithm Evaluation

Page 3: Chapter 5:  CPU Scheduling

5.3 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts – 7th Edition, Feb 2, 2005

Basic ConceptsBasic Concepts

Maximum CPU utilization obtained with multiprogramming

CPU–I/O Burst Cycle – Process execution consists of a cycle of CPU execution and I/O wait

CPU burst distribution: a large number of short CPU bursts and a small number of large CPU bursts

Page 4: Chapter 5:  CPU Scheduling

5.4 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts – 7th Edition, Feb 2, 2005

Alternating Sequence of CPU And I/O BurstsAlternating Sequence of CPU And I/O Bursts

Page 5: Chapter 5:  CPU Scheduling

5.5 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts – 7th Edition, Feb 2, 2005

Histogram of CPU-burst TimesHistogram of CPU-burst Times

Page 6: Chapter 5:  CPU Scheduling

5.6 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts – 7th Edition, Feb 2, 2005

CPU SchedulerCPU Scheduler

Selects from among the processes in memory that are ready to execute, and allocates the CPU to one of them

CPU scheduling decisions may take place when a process:

1. Switches from running to waiting state

2. Switches from running to ready state

3. Switches from waiting to ready

4. Terminates

Scheduling only under conditions 1 and 4 is nonpreemptive or cooperative.

Scheduling under conditions 2 and 3 is preemptive

Page 7: Chapter 5:  CPU Scheduling

5.7 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts – 7th Edition, Feb 2, 2005

CPU SchedulerCPU Scheduler

CPU scheduling conditions:

1. Process switches from running to waiting state

2. Process switches from running to ready state

3. Process switches from waiting to ready

4. Process terminates

Nonpreemptive or cooperative scheduling (1 and 4): Under this type of scheduling, once the CPU has been allocated to a process, the process keeps the CPU until it releases the CPU either by terminating or by switching to the weighting state (Windows 3.x).

Preemptive Scheduling (2 and 3): (Windows- 95, NT, 2000, XP, Vista; Mac OS X, UNIX)

Page 8: Chapter 5:  CPU Scheduling

5.8 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts – 7th Edition, Feb 2, 2005

DispatcherDispatcher

Dispatcher module gives control of the CPU to the process selected by the short-term scheduler; this involves:

switching context

switching to user mode

jumping to the proper location in the user program to restart that program

Dispatch latency – time it takes for the dispatcher to stop one process and start another running

Page 9: Chapter 5:  CPU Scheduling

5.9 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts – 7th Edition, Feb 2, 2005

Scheduling CriteriaScheduling Criteria

CPU utilization – keep the CPU as busy as possible

Throughput – # of processes that complete their execution per time unit

Turnaround time – amount of time to execute a particular process

Waiting time – amount of time a process has been waiting in the ready queue

Response time – amount of time it takes from when a request (I/O )was submitted until the first response is produced

Page 10: Chapter 5:  CPU Scheduling

5.10 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts – 7th Edition, Feb 2, 2005

Optimization CriteriaOptimization Criteria

Max CPU utilization

Max throughput

Min turnaround time

Min waiting time

Min response time

Page 11: Chapter 5:  CPU Scheduling

5.11 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts – 7th Edition, Feb 2, 2005

Scheduling AlgorithmsScheduling Algorithms

Page 12: Chapter 5:  CPU Scheduling

5.12 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts – 7th Edition, Feb 2, 2005

First-Come, First-Served (FCFS) SchedulingFirst-Come, First-Served (FCFS) Scheduling

Process Burst Time

P1 24

P2 3

P3 3

Suppose that the processes arrive in the order: P1 , P2 , P3

The Gantt Chart for the schedule is:

Waiting time for P1 = 0; P2 = 24; P3 = 27 Average waiting time: (0 + 24 + 27)/3 = 17

P1 P2 P3

24 27 300

Page 13: Chapter 5:  CPU Scheduling

5.13 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts – 7th Edition, Feb 2, 2005

FCFS Scheduling (Cont.)FCFS Scheduling (Cont.)

Suppose that the processes arrive in the order

P2 , P3 , P1

The Gantt chart for the schedule is:

Waiting time for P1 = 6; P2 = 0; P3 = 3

Average waiting time: (6 + 0 + 3)/3 = 3

Much better than previous case

Convoy effect (one big CPU-bound process may force other processes to wait for completion of its CPU burst if this big process arrives first)

Hence, execution of short processes prior to a long process is desirable

P1P3P2

63 300

Page 14: Chapter 5:  CPU Scheduling

5.14 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts – 7th Edition, Feb 2, 2005

Shortest-Job-First (SJF) SchedulingShortest-Job-First (SJF) Scheduling

Associate with each process the length of its next CPU burst. Use these lengths to schedule the process with the shortest time (the smallest next CPU burst).

Two schemes:

nonpreemptive – once CPU given to the process it cannot be preempted until completes its CPU burst

preemptive – if a new process arrives with CPU burst length less than remaining time of current executing process, it can preempt the current process. This scheme is known as the Shortest-Remaining-Time-First (SRTF)

SJF is optimal if it gives minimum average waiting time for a given set of processes

Page 15: Chapter 5:  CPU Scheduling

5.15 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts – 7th Edition, Feb 2, 2005

Process Arrival Time Burst Time

P1 0.0 7

P2 2.0 4

P3 4.0 1

P4 5.0 4

SJF (non-preemptive)

Average waiting time = (0 + 6 + 3 + 7)/4 = 4

Example of Non-Preemptive SJFExample of Non-Preemptive SJF

P1 P3 P2

73 160

P4

8 12

Page 16: Chapter 5:  CPU Scheduling

5.16 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts – 7th Edition, Feb 2, 2005

Example of Preemptive SJFExample of Preemptive SJF

Process Arrival Time Burst Time

P1 0.0 7

P2 2.0 4

P3 4.0 1

P4 5.0 4

SJF (preemptive)

Average waiting time = (9 + 1 + 0 +2)/4 = 3

P1 P3P2

42 110

P4

5 7

P2 P1

16

Shortest-Remaining-Time-First (SRTF)

Page 17: Chapter 5:  CPU Scheduling

5.17 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts – 7th Edition, Feb 2, 2005

Determining Length of Next CPU BurstDetermining Length of Next CPU Burst

Can only estimate the length

Can be done by using the length of previous CPU bursts, using exponential averaging

contains the most recent information, contains the past history

α is the relative weight of recent and past history; more commonly it is taken α=1/2, so recent history and past history are equally weighted

nt n

1

1. actual length of CPU burst

2. stores the past history

3. predicted value for the next CPU burst

4. , 0 1

5. Define:

nth

n

n

nt

1 1n n nt

Page 18: Chapter 5:  CPU Scheduling

5.18 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts – 7th Edition, Feb 2, 2005

Philosophy of Exponential AveragingPhilosophy of Exponential Averaging

=0 n+1 = n

Recent history does not count =1

n+1 = tn

Only the actual last CPU burst counts If we expand the formula, we get:

n+1 = tn+(1 - ) tn -1 + …

+(1 - )j tn -j + …

+(1 - )n +1 0

Since both and (1 - ) are less than or equal to 1, each successive term has less weight than its predecessor

Page 19: Chapter 5:  CPU Scheduling

5.19 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts – 7th Edition, Feb 2, 2005

Prediction of the Length of the Next CPU Prediction of the Length of the Next CPU BurstBurst

0 010; 1/2; 6t

1 1n n nt