16
Chapter 5 Analysis of Engineering Business Decisions

Chapter 5 Analysis of Engineering Business Decisions

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Chapter 5 Analysis of Engineering Business Decisions

Chapter 5

Analysis of

Engineering Business Decisions

Page 2: Chapter 5 Analysis of Engineering Business Decisions

Two kind of problems

Cost• Find the least cost machine; find the most economical way of

doing something.• Cash flows involve only cost, possibly with the exception of a

salvage value at the end of an item’s useful life.Investment• Find the most profitable investment = The investment that has

the highest present worth.• Cash flows involve both costs and revenues. Usually there are

high initial costs (capital investment) followed later by revenues.

This class will mostly concern repeatable cost problems.

Page 3: Chapter 5 Analysis of Engineering Business Decisions

• PW Present worth

• AW Annual worth

• Capitalized Worth– Present worth with an infinite time horizon and

repeatability

• Incremental Investment Analysis– IRR with delta method

Techniques

Used for cost-based or investment-based problems

Used only for investment problems

Page 4: Chapter 5 Analysis of Engineering Business Decisions

Repeatability:Does the problem repeat?

Cost problems (repeatability often useful)• Are the cash flows necessary to provide essential

equipment that must be replaced when no longer operational?

• If a machine must be purchased again and again at regular intervals, then the cash flows for purchase, O&M, and salvage repeat.

Investment problems• Usually does not apply.

Page 5: Chapter 5 Analysis of Engineering Business Decisions

Repeatability: analysis

• It will be easier to compare AW of costs than PW. – The AW converts all the cash flows into a steady annualized cost.– The AW can be used to take account of differences in life cycles and

convert cash flows into common units.

• If PW must be used:– The PW study period is critical and must be the same for each alternative

studied. Otherwise the comparison is biased (example: you can not directly compare $5000 for 10 years service vs. $4000 for 7 years. You need common units first)

– The simplest way is to align the PW study period in years, with the life cycles of the equipment so that a whole number of life cycles is considered.

– If the PW study period does not match the life cycles of the alternatives, then end-of-study market values may be needed for the portions of analysis where the study period does not match the life cycle.

– CW or Capitalized Worth is PW with an infinite study period.

Page 6: Chapter 5 Analysis of Engineering Business Decisions

Cost-based exampleCompany needs to buy an

Industrial Drill

MARR = 10%

Drill must be kept running

(Repeatability)

Mitsubishi

Life 4 years

Initial Cost $200 000

O&M $40,000/year

Salvage value $50,000

General ElectricLife 6 yearsInitial Cost $250

000O&M $50,000/yearSalvage value

$30,000

Page 7: Chapter 5 Analysis of Engineering Business Decisions

Compare different methods

• Annual worth method

• PW method with 12 year study period

• PW method with 5 year study period

• CW method

Page 8: Chapter 5 Analysis of Engineering Business Decisions

Annual worth method

AW(Cost)= (Initial Cost)*(A/P,marr%,life)- (SalvageValue)*(A/F,marr%,life)+Annual O&M cost

MitsubishiAW = ($200,000)*(A/P,10%,4)-($50,000)*(A/F,10%,4)+$40,000

=($200,000)*(0.3155)-($50,000)*(0.2155)+$40,000=$63,100-$10775+$40000=$92325 ($/year)

GEAW = ($250,000)*(A/P,10%,6)-($30,000)*(A/F,10%,6)+$50,000

= ($250,000)*(0.2296)-($30,000)*(0.1296)+$50,000=$57400-$3888+$50000=$103512 ($/year)

The Mitsubishi unit has the lowest AW, and therefore the lowest cost.

Page 9: Chapter 5 Analysis of Engineering Business Decisions

PW method with 12 year study period

In 12 years, the company will go through 3 life cycles of Mitsubishi drill vs. 2 life cycles of GE drill

We’ll use an excel spreadsheet for this

Page 10: Chapter 5 Analysis of Engineering Business Decisions

PW method with 5 year study period

Mitsubishi: Need to buy a 2nd drill at end of year 4, then sell it at end of year 5.

GE drill: Need to buy only 1 drill, sell it at end of year 5

Do we know the market values of each drill when they are sold as used? If yes, use them. If no, estimate.

Page 11: Chapter 5 Analysis of Engineering Business Decisions

Estimation of Used Value• The most accurate used “market values” are used

market prices, at which a good actually sold. (example: prices from completed trades or auctions) This data can be difficult to find.

• Used “market values” are not:– Ask prices in a newspaper. Asking prices are usually a

bit too high.– Historical prices. Used market prices change over time.– Prices estimated from a formula

(unless that formula comes from statistical research of the used market… and then it will be a different formula for every product)

Page 12: Chapter 5 Analysis of Engineering Business Decisions

Textbook Method• Is only a rough estimate.• You need the new price, the salvage value S, the

Life L, and an interest rate to use the formula.1. Assume the item generates annual value

A over the life L. Find A from A = (A/P, i%, Life) * New Price - (A/F,i%,L)*SThis particular “A” value is often called the “Capital Recovery value”

2. Suppose that N years are left in the Life.3. Then

Used Value = A * (P/A,i%,N) + S*(P/F,i%,N)

Page 13: Chapter 5 Analysis of Engineering Business Decisions

CW method

The company buy drills forever.

Two ways to solve

1. Use AW for 1 life cycle;then CW=AW/i

2. Or use PW directly over an infinite study period

Hint: Use (P/A,i%,)=1/i and the compounding-interval trick for adjusting i% (i*=(1+i)N-1)for non-yearly cash flows such as purchasing a new drill every 4 or 6 years.

Page 14: Chapter 5 Analysis of Engineering Business Decisions

Let’s switch problems and cover one last topic left over from last

week.

Page 15: Chapter 5 Analysis of Engineering Business Decisions

Incremental Investment Analysis

Procedure1. Sort investments from low to high by capital requirements

2. Determine IRR, select investment with lowest capital requirement having IRR>MARR. Delete investments with IRR<MARR.

3. Call this investment the current alternative

4. Calculate deltas and IRR(deltas) of all remaining investments vs. current alternative.

5. Eliminate any investments where IRR(delta)<MARR.

6. If any of the remaining investments have IRR(delta)>MARR, then select the investment with lowest capital requirement as the “new” current alternative and go back to 3.

Page 16: Chapter 5 Analysis of Engineering Business Decisions

Summary• Repeatable cost-based economic problems are common to equipment selection

and certain public projects (choosing a road surface or hill slip cover) • Common problem variables:

– MARR (I%)– the lifetime for each alternative choice of equipment (L)– Purchase price P for each alternative– Salvage value F for each choice of equipment– Annual O&M Cost for each choice of equipment

• Goal: find lowest cost alternative• Techniques

– PW for N years – create an N year plan for each alternative. Compare the PW of each plan

– AW – Consider a single cycle (buy, use, salvage) of each alternative of equipment and calculate the AW of each alternative.

– CW – Consider plans involving an infinite stream of replacement purchases for each alternative. Calculate the PW of each alternative.

• In theory, these can all produce the same answers.• In practice, concerns such as actual values for used equipment can produce

differences.