Upload
alvin-foster
View
259
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Chapter 4Exploring the External Environment: Macro and Industry Dynamics
2
OBJECTIVES
Explain the importance of the external context for strategy and firm performance
1
Use PESTEL to identify the macro characteristics of the external context
2
Identify the major features of an industry and the forces that affect industry profitability
3
Understand the dynamic characteristics of the external context
4
Show how industry dynamics may redefine industries5
Use scenario planning to predict the future structure of the external context
6
3
THE COLA WARS
“Coca-Cola sells a billion servings – in cans, bottles, and glasses – every day. You can grab a Coke in almost 200 countries. Its archrival, Pepsi, isn’t too far behind. Like ford versus Chevy, theirs is a battle not just for customer dollars, but for their hearts and minds as well.
– The History Channel, “Empires of industry. Cola Wars”
4
THE COLA WARS (TIMELINE)
Coca-Cola
Coca-Cola invented
“Kick Pepsi's can” Diet CokeNew Coke
Repair Coke and restore Stock price Diversify product line
1886
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
Pepsi
“Beat Coke”
“Pepsi Generation”
“Pepsi Challenge”
Foster entrepreneurial spirit of Pepsi’s people
Jettison slow-growing businesses
Diversify beyond soft-drinks
5
EXTERNAL CONTEXT OF STRATEGY
• An internal analysis is just half of what is needed to build strategy
• The SWOT and more complicated frameworks help us understand the full picture
Internal
• Strengths
• Weaknesses
• Capabilities
• Relationships
• Etc.
6
COMPARATIVE INDUSTRY – WIDE LEVEL OF PROFITABILITY, 1995 – 2004
Source: Data from Standard and Poor’s CompuStat
Weighted average return on invested capitalPercent
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
Bever-ages
Ciga-rettes
Pharma-ceuticals
Eatingesta-blish-ments
Steel Rail-roads
Truck-ing
Bott-lers
Comp-uters
Agri-cul-turalproducts
Pre-packagedsoftware
Air-lines
Wire-lesspro-viders
7
THE EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT OF THE ORGANIZATION
Macro Environment Political, Economic, Sociocultural,
Technological, Environmental, Legal
Industry Environment
Strategic Group
The Organization
8
KEY QUESTION TO ASK
What macro environmental conditions will have a material effect on our ability to implement our strategy successfully?
How stable are these characteristics?
What is our firm’s industry?
What are the characteristics of the industry?
9
UNDERSTANDING THE MACRO ENVIRONMENT USING A PESTEL ANALYSIS
• How stable is the political environment?• Tax policies• Etc.
• Projected interest rates?• Inflation?• Etc.
• Lifestyle trends?• Demographic changes?• Etc.
• Level of government research funding?• How mature is technology?• Etc.
Political
Economic
Socio-cultural
Technological
• Is intellectual property protected?• Relevant consumer laws? • Etc.
Legal
10
PRESSURES FAVORING INDUSTRY GLOBALIZATION
• Interdependent countries
• Homogeneous customer needs
• Favorable trade policies
• Large scale and scope economies
• Global competitors
• Global customer needs
• Common technological standards
• Learning and experience
• Global channels • Common manufacturing and marketing regulations
• Sourcing efficiencies
CompetitionMarkets GovernmentsCosts
• Favorable logistics
• Arbitrage opportunities
• High R&D costs
• Transferable marketing approaches
Source: Adapted from M.E. Porter, Competition in Global industries (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1986); G. Yip, “Global Strategy in a World of Nations, “ Sloan Management review 31:1 (1989), 29-40
11
COMPETITION DRIVES PROFITS TO A “NORMAL” LEVEL
CompetitionProfits (abovenormal)
CostsRevenue
Profits (abovenormal)
CostsRevenue
Co
mp
etit
ion
12
KEY SUCCESS FACTORS AS BARRIERS TO ENTRY
Key asset or requisite skill that all firms in an industry must possess in order to be a viable competitor
Key success factor (KSF)
Ability to meet competitive pricing
Extensive distribution
Ability to raise consumer awareness
Broad product mix
Global presence
Well positioned bottlers and bottling capacity
KSFs:
SOFT DRINK EXAMPLE
13
INDUSTRY FRAGMENTATION AND CONCENTRATION
Monopoly Duopoly Fragmented
14
CONCENTRATION IN SELECT U.S. INDUSTRIES
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, “Economic Census: Concentration Rations”, Economic Census 2002 (accessed July 15,2005),www.census.gov/epcd/www/concentration.html
Percent of market
Entirefoodindustry
Animal
food
Break-fastcereal
Dairy pro-ducts
Entireapparel industry
Men’s and boys’ apparel
Women’s and girls’ apparel
Others
Top four competitors
15
ANALYZING INDUSTRY STRUCTURE USING FIVE – FORCES
Complementors
•Number of complements
•Relative value added
•Barriers to complement entry
•Difficulty of engaging complements
•Buyer perception of complements
•Complement exclusivity
Buyer Power (Channel and End consumer)• Bargaining leverage• Buyer volume• Buyer information• Brand identity• Price sensitivity• Threat of backward integration• Product differentiation• Buyer concentration vs. industry• Substitutes available• Buyer’s incentives
Supplier Power• Supplier concentration• Importance of volume to supplier• Differentiation of inputs • Impact of inputs on cost or differentiation• Switching costs of firms in the industry• Presence of substitute inputs• Threat of forward integration• Cost relative to total purchases in industry
Threat of New Entrants (and Entry Barriers)• Absolute cost advantages • Proprietary learning curve• Access to inputs• Government policy• Economies of scale• Capital requirements• Brand identity• Switching costs• Access to distribution• Expected retaliation• Proprietary products
Threat of Substitutes• Switching costs• Buyer inclination to substitute • Price-performance tradeoff of
substitutes• Varity of substitutes• Necessity of product or service
Degree of Rivalry• Exit barriers • Industry concentration• Fixed costs/value added• Industry growth• Intermittent overcapacity• Product differences • Switching costs• Brand identity• Diversity of rivals• Corporate stakes
Source: Adapted from M.E. Porter, Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors (New York: Free Press, 1980)
Industry value chain – from raw materials and other inputs, to channel to end consumer
16
CAUSES OF RIVARLY
Barriers to Entry
• Strong brands • Proprietary technology• Start-up costs • Etc.,
Barriers to Exit
• Few other opportunities • Sunk investments• Etc.,
In addition to entry and exit barriers,many factors drive rivalry
• History of price wars
• Level of fixed costs
• Industry concentration
• Market growth
• Etc.
17
SUPPLIER POWER
When firms in the supply industry can dictate terms, they can extract greater profits
Diamond supplyPercent
DeBeers
Others
50
Diamond Retailers
50
18
BUYER POWER
Suppliers Buyers
Profits
ILLUSTRATIVE
In industries characterized with many suppliers and few buyers, buyers often capture a greater share of profits
Industry A
Suppliers Buyers
Industry B
Profits
19
THREAT OF SUBSTITUTES
Soft drinks
Coke Pepsi
Movie rentals
Block buster
Hollywood videoB
ott
led
wat
er
Cab
le T
V
20
IMPACT OF COMPLEMENTOR
Any factor that makes it more attractive for suppliers to supply an industry on favorable terms or that makes it more attractive for buyers to purchase products or services from an industry at prices higher than it would pay absent the complementor
Complementor:
Hot dogs
+
Buns
More sales
Three Examples
Music
+
MPS player
More attractive offering
Delta plane
orders+
American Airlinesplane orders
Lower costs from Boeing
21
MAPPING STRATEGY GROUPS: U.S. BICYCLE INDUSTRY
Cannondale, GaryFisher, Klein
Huffy,Murray,Brunswick
Schwinn/GTMongoose
TrekSpecialized
Independentdealers
Independentdealers and massmerchandisers
Massmerchandisersonly
Principal distribution channels
Pri
ce/q
ual
ity/
imag
e
Low
High
22
HOW WOULD YOU DO THAT? – U.S. AIRLINE INDUSTRY
Rivalry?
Newentrants?
Buyerpower?
Substitutes?
Supplierpower?
Complementors?
How would youdefine the industry?
23
IMPORTANCE OF DYNAMIC STRATEGIC ANALYSIS
Pineapple industrypre-1980s
Fresh Del-Monte introduces the “Extra Sweet Gold” brighter
color, sweeter, resistant to nothing
FreshDel-Monte
(70%)
Pineapple industry post introduction
24
INDUSTRY LIFE CYCLE
Source: Adapted from K. Rangan and G. Bowman, “Beating the Commodity Magnet,” Industrial Marketing Management 21 (1992), 215-224; P. Kotler, “Managing Products through their Product Life Cycle,” in Marketing Management: Planning, Implementation, and Control, 7th ed (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1991)
Mar
ket
Siz
e
Time
Embryonic
Technological uncertainty
Niche market – selected products for selected markets
Participants emphasize problem solving – product as “solution”
Growing
Customers become better informed
Market expands beyond niche
More competitors enter
Mature
Aggressive customers
Proliferation of products and markets served
Market volatility and beginnings of industry consolidation
In Decline
Product/market contraction
Further consolidation and industry regeneration
25
TECHNOLOGICAL DISCONTINUITIES
Discontinuities
Process-related
Product-related
Southwest airlines radically changed the airline business model by adopting new processes (e.g., a point-to-point model)
In disk-drive industry, virtually every new generation of technology led to demise of market leader
Example
26
Modems
WHEN INDUSTRIES DIVIDE OR COLLIDE
Industries Divide
Invents new interface
Radio
Cable
TV Production
TV networks
Media conglomerate
• Time Warner
• Viacom
• Disney
• Etc.
Launches palm pilot/ creates first PDA
Industries Collide
3-Com
Modems
27
SCENARIO PLANNING
Assess the strategic implications of each scenario
6
Specify indicators that can signal which scenario is unfolding
5
Flesh out the picture4
Develop the framework by defining two specific axes3
Brainstorm key drivers, decision factors, and possible scenario departure or divergence points
2
Define target issue, time frame, and scope for scenarios1
An understanding of the big picture and a plan to manage uncertainty
28
HOW WOULD YOU DO THAT? – CREDIT – UNION INDUSTRY
Changes in the playing field
Minor Major
Source: Adapted from Credit Union Society, 2005: Scenarios for Credit Unions, an Executive Report (Madison, WI: Credit Union Executives Society, 1999)
Tec
hn
olo
gic
al C
han
ge
Rad
ical
Gra
du
al
Technocracy 2005:
The wide-scale adoption of the internet by U.S. consumers has led to massive technological innovation for financial-services companies, increasing their range of distribution channels, as well as their products, services, and geographic scope. Regulations and other changes in the playing field, however, have been slow to follow
Chameleon 2005:
Radical changes occurring in the playing field and in technology make this a highly tumultuous scenario for all credit unions. The nature of competition has evolved so much that banks and credit unions compete directly – under the same rules of the game. This situation has caused a wide-scale convergence of cultures among various financial-services providers, testing the boundaries of the traditional credit-union mission
Credit-Union Power 2005:
Both technology and the playing field have changed at a moderate pace, making this the most stable scenario. Even with moderate change in these areas, however, the changing basis of competition, new business models, human resource challenges, and industry dynamics are different enough to pose significant challenges for many financial-services companies
Wallet Wars 2005:
Prompted by free-market economics, the playing field is changing radically, enabling credit unions and other financial-services institutions to compete more intensely. At the same time, technical innovations have not developed as quickly as many observers and analysts had predicted
29
SUMMARY
Explain the importance of the external context for strategy and firm performance
1
Use PESTEL to identify the macro characteristics of the external context
2
Identify the major features of an industry and the forces that affect industry profitability
3
Understand the dynamic characteristics of the external context
4
Show how industry dynamics may redefine industries5
Use scenario planning to predict the future structure of the external context
6