47
Chapter 3: Processes Chapter 3: Processes

Chapter 3: Processes

  • Upload
    teo

  • View
    40

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Chapter 3: Processes. Chapter 3: Processes. Process Concept Process Scheduling Operations on Processes Cooperating Processes Interprocess Communication Communication in Client-Server Systems. Process Concept. An operating system executes a variety of programs: Batch system – jobs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Chapter 3:  Processes

Chapter 3: ProcessesChapter 3: Processes

Page 2: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.2 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

Chapter 3: ProcessesChapter 3: Processes

Process Concept

Process Scheduling

Operations on Processes

Cooperating Processes

Interprocess Communication

Communication in Client-Server Systems

Page 3: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.3 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

Process ConceptProcess Concept

An operating system executes a variety of programs:

Batch system – jobs

Time-shared systems – user programs or tasks

Textbook uses the terms job and process almost interchangeably

Process – a program in execution; process execution must progress in sequential fashion

A process includes:

program counter

stack

data section

Page 4: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.4 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

Process StateProcess State

As a process executes, it changes state

new: The process is being created

running: Instructions are being executed

waiting: The process is waiting for some event to occur

ready: The process is waiting to be assigned to a processor

terminated: The process has finished execution

Page 5: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.5 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

Process Control Block (PCB)Process Control Block (PCB)

Information associated with each process

Process state

Program counter

CPU registers

CPU scheduling information

Memory-management information

Accounting information

I/O status information

Page 6: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.6 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

CPU Switch From Process to ProcessCPU Switch From Process to Process

Page 7: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.7 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

Process Scheduling QueuesProcess Scheduling Queues

Job queue – set of all processes in the system

Ready queue – set of all processes residing in main memory, ready and waiting to execute

Device queues – set of processes waiting for an I/O device

Processes migrate among the various queues

Page 8: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.8 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

Representation of Process SchedulingRepresentation of Process Scheduling

Page 9: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.9 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

SchedulersSchedulers

Long-term scheduler (or job scheduler) – selects which processes should be brought into the ready queue

Short-term scheduler (or CPU scheduler) – selects which process should be executed next and allocates CPU

Medium-term schedulers (or swapping):

Page 10: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.10 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

Scheduler issues (Cont.)Scheduler issues (Cont.)

Short-term scheduler is invoked very frequently (milliseconds) (must be fast)

Long-term scheduler is invoked very infrequently (seconds, minutes) (may be slow)

The long-term scheduler controls the degree of multiprogramming

Processes can be described as either:

I/O-bound process – spends more time doing I/O than computations, many short CPU bursts

CPU-bound process – spends more time doing computations; few very long CPU bursts

Page 11: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.11 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

Context SwitchContext Switch

When CPU switches to another process, the system must save the state of the old process and load the saved state for the new process

Context-switch time is overhead; the system does no useful work while switching

Time dependent on hardware support:

Intel provides Task Switch Segments (TSS)

Not used in Linux because of lack of flexibility

Page 12: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.12 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

Process Creation OptionsProcess Creation Options

Parent process create children processes, which, in turn create other processes, forming a tree of processes

Resource sharing

Parent and children share all resources

Children share subset of parent’s resources

Parent and child share no resources

Execution

Parent and children execute concurrently

Parent waits until children terminate

Page 13: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.13 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

Process Creation Steps (Cont.)Process Creation Steps (Cont.)

Address space

Child duplicate of parent

Child has a program loaded into it

UNIX examples

fork system call creates new process

exec system call used after a fork to replace the process’ memory space with a new program

Page 14: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.14 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

C Program Forking Separate ProcessC Program Forking Separate Process

int main(){pid_t pid;

/* fork another process */pid = fork();if (pid < 0) { /* error occurred */

fprintf(stderr, "Fork Failed");exit(-1);

}else if (pid == 0) { /* child process */

execlp("/bin/ls", "ls", NULL);}else { /* parent process */

/* parent will wait for the child to complete */

wait (NULL);printf ("Child Complete");exit(0);

}}

Page 15: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.15 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

A tree of processes on a typical SolarisA tree of processes on a typical Solaris

Page 16: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.16 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

Process TerminationProcess Termination

Process executes last statement and asks the operating system to delete it (exit)

Output data from child to parent (via wait)

Process’ resources are deallocated by operating system

Parent may terminate execution of children processes (abort)

Child has exceeded allocated resources

Task assigned to child is no longer required

If parent is exiting

Some operating system do not allow child to continue if its parent terminates

– All children terminated - cascading termination

Page 17: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.17 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

Process HierarchyProcess Hierarchy

Process ID

Process Group ID

Session ID

Parent Process ID

Page 18: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.18 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

Process Group Process Group

A process whose process group ID is the same with its PID is called a process group leader.

setpgid(pid, pgid), setpgrp() A process group can be signalled (e.g. stopped, resumed, killed)

#kill -s SIGSTOP 0 //^Z

#kill -s SIGSTOP -23090

Page 19: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.19 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

Foreground Process Group Foreground Process Group

Foreground processes of a controlling terminal are those whose pgid=pgid(terminal). Only foreground processes can read from terminal, while the other ones block (getting SIGTTOU SIGTTIN).

The pgid of a terminal is changed with TIOGPGRP and TIOCSPGRP: #include <termios.h> int tcsetpgrp (int fd, int grppid), int tcgetpgrp (int fd)

Ex: bash %n brings job n in foreground (see ‘man bash’ #JOB control) %n & moves job n in the background

Page 20: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.20 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

SessionsSessions

A session is a group of process groups related to a login shell or to a daemon. They provide an isolated environment for these processes and their children.

E.g. A process cannot be moved between groups in different sessions.

The level of isolation is lower than for Solaris zones.

Page 21: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.21 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

SessionsSessions

1. Session leader: created with setsid(), becomes also process group leader.

All processes in a session have the same controlling terminal or none.

Acquiring a controlling terminal: ioctl (fd_terminal, TIOCSTTY, 0);

(non-POSIX behavior) the first terminal opened by a session leader becomes its controlling terminal.

On hangup, SIGHUP is sent to the session leader, and on its exit forwarded to foreground and to process groups with stopped members. On the exit of a sesion leader, SIGHUP is sent to its children.

Page 22: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.22 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

UNIX DaemonsUNIX Daemons

A controlling terminal is the terminal that can send SIGINT, SIGTERM to the process.

When its controlling terminal is closed, a process receives a signal that kills it.

The controlling terminal is associated to a session by the session leader

A process (preferably not a session leader to avoid involuntary terminal aquisition) without controlling terminal is called daemon

Page 23: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.23 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

daemon_init()daemon_init()

void daemon_init(){

int i;

pid_t pid;

if((pid = fork()) != 0) exit(0); // parent terminates, make sure can may call sedsid

setsid();

signal(SIGHUP, SIG_IGN); // ignore hangup of controlling terminal

if ( (pid = fork()) != 0 ) // first child –session leader-- terminates, make sure not acquire control tty

// DONE. can open a log, set umask, close file descriptors....

chdir(“/”); umask (0); close(0); close (1); close (2);

// logging can be done automatically using syslogd via a socket when syslog is called first

// alternatively, one can use openlog() and closelog()

}

Page 24: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.24 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

daemondaemon

Some systems offer you the system call:

#include <unistd.h>

int daemon(int nochdir, int noclose);

Unless nochdir is non-zero, the current directory is changed to root “/”

Unless noclose is non-zero, daemon() will redirect stdin, stdout and stderr to /dev/null

Page 25: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.25 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

fork()fork()

Inherited: process credentials (real/effective/saved

UIDs and GIDs) environment stack memory open file descriptors (note that the underlying

file positions are shared between the parent and child, which can be confusing)

close-on-exec flags signal handling settings nice value scheduler class process group ID session ID current working directory root directory file mode creation mask (umask) resource limits controlling terminal

Unique to the child: process ID different parent process ID Own copy of file descriptors and

directory streams. process, text, data and other memory

locks are NOT inherited. process times, in the tms struct resource utilizations are set to 0 pending signals initialized to the empty

set timers created by timer_create not

inherited asynchronous input or output

operations not inherited

Page 26: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.26 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

Cooperating ProcessesCooperating Processes

Independent process cannot affect or be affected by the execution of another process

Cooperating process can affect or be affected by the execution of another process

Advantages of process cooperation

Information sharing

Computation speed-up

Modularity

ConvenienceConvenience

Page 27: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.27 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

Producer-Consumer ProblemProducer-Consumer Problem

Paradigm for cooperating processes, producer process produces information that is consumed by a consumer process

unbounded-buffer places no practical limit on the size of the buffer

bounded-buffer assumes that there is a fixed buffer size

Page 28: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.28 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

Bounded-Buffer – Shared-Memory SolutionBounded-Buffer – Shared-Memory Solution

Shared data

#define BUFFER_SIZE 10

typedef struct {

. . .

} item;

item buffer[BUFFER_SIZE];

int in = 0;

int out = 0; Solution is correct, but can only use BUFFER_SIZE-1 elements

Page 29: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.29 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

Bounded-Buffer – Insert() MethodBounded-Buffer – Insert() Method

while (true) { /* Produce an item */

while ( ( (in + 1) % BUFFER SIZE) == out)

; /* do nothing -- no free buffers */

buffer[in] = item;

in = (in + 1) % BUFFER SIZE;

}

Page 30: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.30 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

Bounded Buffer – Remove() MethodBounded Buffer – Remove() Method

while (true) {

while (in == out)

; // do nothing -- nothing to consume

// remove an item from the buffer

item = buffer[out];

out = (out + 1) % BUFFER SIZE;

return item;

}

Page 31: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.31 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

Interprocess Communication (IPC)Interprocess Communication (IPC)

Mechanism for processes to communicate and to synchronize their actions

Message system – processes communicate with each other without resorting to shared variables

IPC facility provides two operations: send(message) – message size fixed or variable receive(message)

If P and Q wish to communicate, they need to: establish a communication link between them exchange messages via send/receive

ways to look at the implementation of communication link physical (e.g., shared memory, hardware bus) logical (e.g., logical properties) – the way we will look now

Page 32: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.32 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

Logic Implementation QuestionsLogic Implementation Questions

How are links established?

Can a link be associated with more than two processes?

How many links can there be between every pair of communicating processes?

What is the capacity of a link?

Is the size of a message that the link can accommodate fixed or variable?

Is a link unidirectional or bi-directional?

Page 33: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.33 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

Communications Models Communications Models

Indirect Direct(sockets) (signals)

Page 34: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.34 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

Direct CommunicationDirect Communication

Processes must name each other explicitly:

send (P, message) – send a message to process P

receive(Q, message) – receive a message from process Q

Properties of communication link

Links are established automatically

A link is associated with exactly one pair of communicating processes

Between each pair there exists exactly one link

The link may be unidirectional, but is usually bi-directional

Page 35: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.35 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

Indirect CommunicationIndirect Communication

Messages are directed and received from mailboxes (also referred to as ports)

Each mailbox has a unique id

Processes can communicate only if they share a mailbox

Properties of communication link

Link established only if processes share a common mailbox

A link may be associated with many processes

Each pair of processes may share several communication links

Link may be unidirectional or bi-directional

Page 36: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.36 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

Indirect CommunicationIndirect Communication

Operations

create a new mailbox

send and receive messages through mailbox

destroy a mailbox

Primitives are defined as:

send(A, message) – send a message to mailbox A

receive(A, message) – receive a message from mailbox A

Page 37: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.37 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

Indirect CommunicationIndirect Communication

Mailbox sharing

P1, P2, and P3 share mailbox A

P1, sends; P2 and P3 receive

Who gets the message?

Solutions

Allow a link to be associated with at most two processes

Allow only one process at a time to execute a receive operation

Allow the system to select arbitrarily the receiver. Sender is notified who the receiver was.

Page 38: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.38 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

SynchronizationSynchronization

Message passing may be either blocking or non-blocking

Blocking is considered synchronous

Blocking send has the sender block until the message is received

Blocking receive has the receiver block until a message is available

Non-blocking is considered asynchronous

Non-blocking send has the sender send the message and continue

Non-blocking receive has the receiver receive a valid message or null

Page 39: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.39 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

BufferingBuffering

Queue of messages attached to the link; implemented in one of three ways

1. Zero capacity – 0 messagesSender must wait for receiver (rendezvous)

2. Bounded capacity – finite length of n messagesSender must wait if link full

3. Unbounded capacity – infinite length Sender never waits

Page 40: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.40 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

Client-Server CommunicationClient-Server Communication

Sockets

Remote Procedure Calls

Remote Method Invocation (Java)

Page 41: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.41 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

SocketsSockets

A socket is defined as an endpoint for communication

Concatenation of IP address and port

The socket 161.25.19.8:1625 refers to port 1625 on host 161.25.19.8

Communication consists between a pair of sockets

Page 42: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.42 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

Socket CommunicationSocket Communication

Page 43: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.43 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

Remote Procedure CallsRemote Procedure Calls

Remote procedure call (RPC) abstracts procedure calls between processes on networked systems.

Stubs – client-side proxy for the actual procedure on the server.

The client-side stub locates the server and marshals the parameters.

The server-side stub receives this message, unpacks the marshaled parameters, and performs the procedure on the server.

Page 44: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.44 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

Execution of RPCExecution of RPC

Page 45: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.45 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

Remote Method InvocationRemote Method Invocation

Remote Method Invocation (RMI) is a Java mechanism similar to RPCs.

RMI allows a Java program on one machine to invoke a method on a remote object.

Page 46: Chapter 3:  Processes

3.46 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006

Marshalling ParametersMarshalling Parameters

Page 47: Chapter 3:  Processes

End of Chapter 3End of Chapter 3