Upload
ishthee
View
227
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/14/2019 CHAPTER 3 p74
1/20
CHAPTER 111
METHODOLOGY
3.1 Box and Behnken Design
The Box-Behnken design is an independent quadratic design that does not contain
an embedded factorial or fractional factorial design. In this design the treatment
combinations are at the midpoints of edges of the process space and at the center. These
designs are rotatable (or near rotatable) and require 3 levels of each factor. The designs
have limited capability for orthogonal blocking compared to the central composite
designs.
Figure 2: This figure shows the Box and Behnken Design for Three Factors
The geometry of this design suggests a sphere within the process space such that
the surface of the sphere protrudes through each face with the surface of the sphere
tangential to the midpoint of each edge of the space.
For three factors, the Box-Behnken design offers some advantage in requiring a
fewer number of runs. For 4 or more factors, this advantage disappears.
56
8/14/2019 CHAPTER 3 p74
2/20
Table 5: This table shows the Camote Flour, Fat, Cake Flour and its parameters
Camote flour (X1) Fat (X2) Cake flour (X3)
+1 = 45 +1 = 25 +1 = 45
0 = 40 0 = 20 0 = 40-1 = 35 -1 = 15 -1 = 35
Coded
Table 6: This table shows the Coded samples of Camote flour, Fat, Cake Flour and the different
formulations
X1 X2 X3
1 +1 -1 02 -1 -1 0
3 +1 0 +1
4 -1 +1 +1
5 +1 +1 +1
6 -1 0 0
7 0 +1 -1
8 0 -1 +1
9 0 0 0
10 -1 -1 -1
11 -1 +1 0
12 0 -1 -113 0 +1 +1
14 0 +1 +1
15 0 +1 +1
57
8/14/2019 CHAPTER 3 p74
3/20
Uncoded
Table 7: This table shows the Uncoded samples of Camote flour, Fat, Cake Flour and the different
formulations
X1 X2 X3
1 45 15 40
2 35 15 40
3 45 20 45
4 35 25 45
5 45 25 45
6 35 20 40
7 40 25 35
8 40 15 45
9 40 20 40
10 35 15 35
11 35 25 40
12 40 15 35
13 40 25 45
14 40 25 45
15 40 25 45
58
8/14/2019 CHAPTER 3 p74
4/20
3.2 Materials
Table 8: This table shows the Raw Materials, Quantity, Unit and Specifications
Raw Materials Quantity Unit Specifications
Sweet Potato * Kilograms fresh
Cake flour * Kilograms
Sugar 50 Grams refined
Baking powder 2 Grams
Salt 0.5 Grams
Egg 55 Grams fresh
Milk 100 Milliliter evaporated
Butter * Kilograms*Quantity depends on different formulations
Sweet Potato
The sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas), commonly
called a yam in parts of the United States (especially in the
southern and western portions of the country; this
terminology causes some confusion with true yams), is a
crop plant whose large, starchy, sweet tasting tuberous
roots are an important root vegetable.Figure 3: Shows the raw sweet potato
Cake Flour
Soft flour is comparatively low in gluten and so results in a
finer texture. Soft flour is usually divided into cake flour,
which is the lowest in gluten, and pastry flour, which has
slightly more gluten than cake flour.
Figure 4: Shows the cake flour
Sugar
Sugar (the word stems from the Sanskrit sharkara) consists
of a class of edible crystalline substances including sucrose,
59
8/14/2019 CHAPTER 3 p74
5/20
lactose, and fructose. Human taste-buds interpret its flavor
as sweet.
Figure 5: Shows the sugar
Baking Powder
Baking powder is a dry chemical used in cookery, mainly
baking. Traditional baking powder was composed of a
mixture of tartaric acid and bicarbonate of soda (baking
soda), a quantity of flour usually being added to reduce the
strength.
Figure 6: Shows the baking powder
Salt
Salt is a dietary mineral essential for animal life, composed
primarily of sodium chloride. Salt for human consumption
is produced in different forms: unrefined salt (such as sea
salt), refined salt (table salt), and iodised salt. It is a
crystalline solid, white, pale pink or light grey in color,
normally obtained from sea water or rock deposits. Edible
rock salts may be slightly greyish in color due to this
mineral content.
Figure 7: Shows the salt
Egg
An egg is a round or oval body laid by the female of many
animals, consisting of an ovum surrounded by layers of
membranes and an outer casing, which acts to nourish and
protect a developing embryo and its nutrient reserves.
Figure 8: Shows the chicken egg
Milk
Milk is an opaque white liquid produced by the mammary
glands of female mammals (including monotremes).
60
8/14/2019 CHAPTER 3 p74
6/20
Figure 9: Shows the milk
Butter
Butter is a dairy product made by churning fresh or
fermented cream or milk.
Figure 10: Shows the butter
Muffin
A muffin is somewhat like a small cake, and though it doesresemble a cupcake: they have cylindrical bases, rounded
conical tops, and are usually not as sweet as cupcakes;
savory varieties (such as cornbread muffins) also exist.
They generally fit in the palm of an adult hand, and are
intended to be consumed by an individual in a single
sitting.
Figure 11: Shows the muffin
3.3 Utensils and Equipment
Table 9: This table shows the utensils and equipment that are used in sweet potato muffin.
Description Quantity Specification Source
61
8/14/2019 CHAPTER 3 p74
7/20
Knife
Chopping board
Utility tray
Mixing bowl
Dietetic scale
Ladle
Casserole
Cookie sheet
Strainer
Peeler
Oven thermometer
Measuring cup (liquid)
Measuring cup (solid)
Measuring spoon
2 pcs.
2 pcs.
2 pcs.
1 set
1 unit
1 pc.
1 pc.
2 pcs.
1 pc.
2 pcs.
1 unit
1 set
1 set
1set
Metal
Metal
Metal
Metal
Metal
PFP storage room
PFP storage room
PFP storage room
PFP storage room
PFP storage room
PFP storage room
PFP storage room
PFP storage room
PFP storage room
PFP storage room
PFP storage room
PFP storage room
PFP storage room
PFP storage room
The raw materials used were of good quality fresh sweet potato of Ipomoea
Batatas specie, of medium size and yellow color; cake flour, refined sugar, baking
powder, salt, fresh egg, evaporated milk and butter. The utensils were borrowed from
PUP Pilot Plant.
Process Flow of Sweet Potato Muffin
Selection of Raw Materials
Preparation of Raw Materials
62
8/14/2019 CHAPTER 3 p74
8/20
Peeling
Slicing
Soaking
Sun Drying
Oven Drying
Sorting
Grinding
Mixing
Baking
Cooling
Packing
Labeling
StoringFigure 12: This figure shows the Process Flow of Sweet potato muffin
3.4 Process in Making Sweet Potato Muffin
3.4.1 Selection and Preparation of Raw Materials
63
8/14/2019 CHAPTER 3 p74
9/20
Quality assurance was employed in checking the quality of the raw sweet
potato that will be used in making sweet potato noodles. It was test according to
color, appearance and texture.
Any soil on the roots must be removed before the root is peeled using a
clean kitchen knife. Any damaged parts of the raw sweet potato should be
trimmed off.
3.4.2 Peeling
The skin of sweet potato is peeled using a clean kitchen knife.
3.4.3 Slicing / Chipping
After washing, the sweet potatoes are dried in a clean place in the sun for
about 10 minutes to remove the surface water. A manual or mechanical chipper /
slicer is then used to cut the sweet potato into uniform pieces.
3.4.4 Soaking
Slices are soaked in clean tap water for 5-10 minutes. The volume of water
used is twice the weight of the slices and is just enough to cover all the slices.
3.4.5 Drying (Sun Drying and Oven Drying)
64
8/14/2019 CHAPTER 3 p74
10/20
The slices are then either sun dried on a raised tray for approximately 4-6
hours if weather conditions are suitable, or in an oven dryer. The drying tray
should be raised off the ground to prevent dust and dirt contaminating the chips. If
drying rate will depend on the thickness of the slices, rate of turning chips as they
dry and the amount of sliced chips place on the tray.
3.4.6 Sorting and Grinding
The dried sweet potato chips can now be milled into flour. The dried sweet
potato chips can be sorted for uniformity before packaging or further processing,
if this might affect the quality, intended use or price.
3.4.7 Mixing
In a large bowl, combine sweet potato flour, cake flour, sugar, baking
powder, salt, egg, milk and butter based on different formulations.
3.4.8 Baking
65
8/14/2019 CHAPTER 3 p74
11/20
Pre-heat the oven. Bake the muffin at 200C (400F) for 20-25 minutes.
3.4.9 Cooling
Turn onto wire racks to cool.
3.4.10 Packing and Storage
Sweet potato muffin can be safely packed and stored in polythene bags as
well as baskets and tins.
3.5 Methods of Evaluation
The different finished products of muffin made from the sweet potato flour were
evaluated. The formulations were different in percentage of the three (3) variables (Sweet
potato flour, Fat and Cake Flour). Finished products were subjected to sensory
evaluation.
3.6 Subjective Evaluation
The fifteen (15) experimental samples were coded with random numbers. All the
product samples including the Control were presented to a panel of ten (10) students for
sensory evaluation. Samples were labeled identically and were placed in identical paper
plates and each panelist were asked to evaluate the experimental samples according to the
paneling parameters namely; color, texture, taste / flavor, tenderness, odor / aroma, and
firmness.
66
8/14/2019 CHAPTER 3 p74
12/20
Panelists were asked to strictly follow the instruction given in the score sheet. It
was important that the panelist drank or gargled with water to remove any lingering taste
or flavor brought about by the previous sample.
67
8/14/2019 CHAPTER 3 p74
13/20
Flow Chart
Selection of Raw Materials
Preparation of Raw Materials
Peeling
Slicing
Soaking
Sun Drying
Oven Drying
Sorting
Grinding
Subjective Evaluation Objective Evaluation
Mixing
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Baking
Cooling
Subjective Evaluation Objective Evaluation
Packing
Labeling
StoringFigure 13: This figure shows the flow chart of Sweet Potato Muffin
68
8/14/2019 CHAPTER 3 p74
14/20
3.7 Objective Evaluation
The best produced finished product which is formulation 12 was subjected to
microbial analysis wherein yeast and mold count were determined.
3.7.1 Microbial Analysis
3.7.1.1 Yeast and Mold Count
One gram of sample was weighed and dissolved in 99 ml. distilled water in an
Erlenmeyer flask, serial dilution was made by transferring one ml of diluted sample to a 9
ml. of distilled water as 1:10. Further dilution were made as 1:1000, one ml. of each
dilution was transferred into a petrifilm. Incubated for 24 hrs. at 25C in incubator. After
incubation, number of colonies of at least 2 plates was counted, rounded up to 2
significant figures. Then, was multiplied by the dilution of the water (Bryan, 1973).
3.7.1.2 pH Count
pH can be measured:
by addition of a pH indicator into the solution under study. The indicator color
varies depending on the pH of the solution. Using indicators, qualitative determin-
ations can be made with universal indicators that have broad color variability over
a wide pH range and quantitative determinations can be made using indicators
that have strong color variability over a small pH range. Precise measurements
can be made over a wide pH range using indicators that have multiple equilibri-
ums in conjunction with spectrophotometric methods to determine the relative
abundance of each pH-dependent component that make up the color of solution,
or
69
8/14/2019 CHAPTER 3 p74
15/20
by using a pH meter together with pH-selective electrodes (pH glass electrode,
hydrogen electrode, quinhydrone electrode, ion sensitive field effect transistor and
others).
by using pH paper, indicator paper that turns color corresponding to a pH on a
color key. pH paper is usually small strips of paper (or a continuous tape that can
be torn) that has been soaked in an indicator solution, and is used for approxima-
tions.
3.7.2 Proximate Analysis
3.7.2.1 Ash
Ash is the inorganic residue remaining after the water and organic matter have
been removed by heating in the presence of oxidizing agents, which provides a measure
of the total amount of minerals within a food. Analytical techniques for providing
information about the total mineral content are based on the fact that the minerals can be
distinguished from all the other components within a food in some measurable way. The
most widely used methods are based on the fact that minerals are not destroyed by
heating, and that they have a low volatility compared to other food components. The
three main types of analytical procedure used to determine the ash content of foods are
based on this principle: dry ashing, wet ashing and low temperature plasma dry ashing.
The method chosen for a particular analysis depends on the reason for carrying out the
analysis, the type of food analyzed and the equipment available. Ashing may also be used
as the first step in preparing samples for analysis of specific minerals, by atomic
spectroscopy or the various traditional methods described below. Ash contents of fresh
foods rarely exceed 5%, although some processed foods can have ash contents as high as
12%, e.g., dried beef.
3.7.2.2 Moisture
Weigh out 5 g of sample into a tared porcelain crucible or aluminum drying dish
spreading the sample as thin as possible over the base of the dish. Put the dish and
contents in an oven maintained at 105C and dry for 4 hrs. Remove cool in a dessicator
70
8/14/2019 CHAPTER 3 p74
16/20
and weigh.Return the dish to the oven and ready for a further 30 minutes. Remove, cool
and weigh. Continue drying until a constant weigh has been reached. Calculate the
moisture content from the weight loss of the sample.
Calculation:
% Moisture = Initial Weight Final Weight x 100
Weight of Sample Used
3.7.2.3 Crude Protein
Laboratories measure the nitrogen (N) content of the forage and calculate crude
protein using the formula: CP = % N x 6.25. Crude protein will include both true proteinand non-protein nitrogen. Cattle can use both types to some varying degree. Crude
protein values give no indication if heat damage has occurred, which may alter protein
availability.
3.7.2.4 Crude Fat
The traditional method for the analysis of fat was developed by German chemist
Franz von Soxhlet in 1879. Essentially, the sample is suspended between a flask of
boiling solvent and a condenser. The solvent evaporates, is condensed onto the sample,
and thereby extracts the fatty matter en route back to the bulk solvent. Since freshly
distilled solvent is continually contracting the sample, the solute's affinity for the solvent
continues until the extraction is complete. By evaporating the excess solvent, the residual
matter is quantified gravimetrically as fat. Soxhlet's procedure was significantly
improved in 1974 by American chemist Edward Randall. The Randall technique
immerses the sample in boiling solvent and then continuously elutes the sample with
freshly condensed solvent.
71
8/14/2019 CHAPTER 3 p74
17/20
3.7.2.5 Total Carbohydrates
By difference :
This involves obtaining the variable carbohydrates content by calculation having
estimated all the other fractions by proximate analysis as shown below:
% Available Cabohydrates = 100 % - (% Moisture + % Ash + % Fat + % Protein
+ % Fibre)
3.8 Cost Evaluation
The cost of the product must be evaluated based on raw materials used in the
preparation including utilities and packaging material, production cost and mark-up
which is based on the weight of every formulation of each product.
Table 10: This Table shows the cost analysis of sweet potato flour
Unit Cost Quantity Actual Cost
Sweet Potato 28.00 / kg 3 kg 84.00
Overhead Cost
Labor (minimum) 15.00 / hr 3 hrs 45.00
Electricity 5.00 5.00Water 2.00 2.00
Fuel 10.00 10.00
Packaging 5.00 5.00
Total Cost 67.00
Unit Cost 151.00
10% mark-up 15.10
Selling Price 166.10 / kg
72
8/14/2019 CHAPTER 3 p74
18/20
Table 11: This table shows the cost analysis of sweet potato muffinS-45
C-40
F-15
S-35
C-40
F-15
S-45
C-45
F-20
S-35
C-45
F-25
S-45
C-45
F-25
S-35
C-40
F-20
S-40
C-35
F-25
S-40
C-45
F-15
S-40
C-40
F-20
S-35
C-35
F-15
S-35
C-40
F-25
S-40
C-35
F-15
S-40
C-45
F-25
S-45
C-40
F-25
S
C
F
Unit
Cost
Quantity F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8 F9 F10 F11 F12 F13 F14 F
weet Potato
lour
166.1 /
kg
7.5 5.8 7.5 5.8 7.5 5.8 6.6 6.6 6.6 5.8 5.8 6.6 6.6 7.5 6
Cake Flour 38 / /kg 1.5 1.5 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.5 1.3 1.7 1.5
ugar 35 / kg 50 g 1.75
Bakingowder 16 / 100g 2 g 0.32
alt 6 / kg 0.5 g 0.00
3
Egg (137.5 /
c)
35 / pc 55 g 1.4
Milk 20/100
ml
100 ml 20
Butter 35 / kg 0.53 0.53 0.7 0.88 0.88 0.7 0.88 0.53 0.7 0.53 0.88 0.53 0.88 0.88 0
Total Cost ofngredients
33.00
31.3 33.37
31.85
33.55
31.47
32.25
32.3 32.27
31.1 31.65
31.9 32.65
33.35
3
Overhead Cost
Labor
minimum)
15.00 /
hr
1 hr 15.0
0Electricity 5.00 5.00
Water 2.00 2.00
uel 8.00 8.00
ackaging 5.00 5.00
Total Cost 35.0
0
35.0
0
35.0
0
35.0
0
35.0
0
35.0
0
35.0
0
35.0
0
35.0
0
35.0
0
35.0
0
35.0
0
35.0
0
35.0
0
3
Unit Price 68.00
66.3 68.37
66.85
68.55
66.47
67.25
67.3 67.27
66.1 66.65
66.9 67.65
68.35
6
0% mark-up 6.80 6.63 6.837
6.685
6.855
6.647
6.725
6.73 6.727
6.61 6.665
6.69 6.765
6.835
6
7
8/14/2019 CHAPTER 3 p74
19/20
elling Priceer 12 pcs.
74.8 72.93
75.21
73.54
75.41
73.12
73.98
74.03
74 72.71
73.32
73.59
74.42
75.19
7
elling Priceer pc.
6.23 6.08 6.27 6.13 6.28 6.09 6.17 6.17 6.17 6.06 6.11 6.13 6.2 6.27 6
7
8/14/2019 CHAPTER 3 p74
20/20