CHAPTER 3 p74

  • Upload
    ishthee

  • View
    227

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/14/2019 CHAPTER 3 p74

    1/20

    CHAPTER 111

    METHODOLOGY

    3.1 Box and Behnken Design

    The Box-Behnken design is an independent quadratic design that does not contain

    an embedded factorial or fractional factorial design. In this design the treatment

    combinations are at the midpoints of edges of the process space and at the center. These

    designs are rotatable (or near rotatable) and require 3 levels of each factor. The designs

    have limited capability for orthogonal blocking compared to the central composite

    designs.

    Figure 2: This figure shows the Box and Behnken Design for Three Factors

    The geometry of this design suggests a sphere within the process space such that

    the surface of the sphere protrudes through each face with the surface of the sphere

    tangential to the midpoint of each edge of the space.

    For three factors, the Box-Behnken design offers some advantage in requiring a

    fewer number of runs. For 4 or more factors, this advantage disappears.

    56

  • 8/14/2019 CHAPTER 3 p74

    2/20

    Table 5: This table shows the Camote Flour, Fat, Cake Flour and its parameters

    Camote flour (X1) Fat (X2) Cake flour (X3)

    +1 = 45 +1 = 25 +1 = 45

    0 = 40 0 = 20 0 = 40-1 = 35 -1 = 15 -1 = 35

    Coded

    Table 6: This table shows the Coded samples of Camote flour, Fat, Cake Flour and the different

    formulations

    X1 X2 X3

    1 +1 -1 02 -1 -1 0

    3 +1 0 +1

    4 -1 +1 +1

    5 +1 +1 +1

    6 -1 0 0

    7 0 +1 -1

    8 0 -1 +1

    9 0 0 0

    10 -1 -1 -1

    11 -1 +1 0

    12 0 -1 -113 0 +1 +1

    14 0 +1 +1

    15 0 +1 +1

    57

  • 8/14/2019 CHAPTER 3 p74

    3/20

    Uncoded

    Table 7: This table shows the Uncoded samples of Camote flour, Fat, Cake Flour and the different

    formulations

    X1 X2 X3

    1 45 15 40

    2 35 15 40

    3 45 20 45

    4 35 25 45

    5 45 25 45

    6 35 20 40

    7 40 25 35

    8 40 15 45

    9 40 20 40

    10 35 15 35

    11 35 25 40

    12 40 15 35

    13 40 25 45

    14 40 25 45

    15 40 25 45

    58

  • 8/14/2019 CHAPTER 3 p74

    4/20

    3.2 Materials

    Table 8: This table shows the Raw Materials, Quantity, Unit and Specifications

    Raw Materials Quantity Unit Specifications

    Sweet Potato * Kilograms fresh

    Cake flour * Kilograms

    Sugar 50 Grams refined

    Baking powder 2 Grams

    Salt 0.5 Grams

    Egg 55 Grams fresh

    Milk 100 Milliliter evaporated

    Butter * Kilograms*Quantity depends on different formulations

    Sweet Potato

    The sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas), commonly

    called a yam in parts of the United States (especially in the

    southern and western portions of the country; this

    terminology causes some confusion with true yams), is a

    crop plant whose large, starchy, sweet tasting tuberous

    roots are an important root vegetable.Figure 3: Shows the raw sweet potato

    Cake Flour

    Soft flour is comparatively low in gluten and so results in a

    finer texture. Soft flour is usually divided into cake flour,

    which is the lowest in gluten, and pastry flour, which has

    slightly more gluten than cake flour.

    Figure 4: Shows the cake flour

    Sugar

    Sugar (the word stems from the Sanskrit sharkara) consists

    of a class of edible crystalline substances including sucrose,

    59

  • 8/14/2019 CHAPTER 3 p74

    5/20

    lactose, and fructose. Human taste-buds interpret its flavor

    as sweet.

    Figure 5: Shows the sugar

    Baking Powder

    Baking powder is a dry chemical used in cookery, mainly

    baking. Traditional baking powder was composed of a

    mixture of tartaric acid and bicarbonate of soda (baking

    soda), a quantity of flour usually being added to reduce the

    strength.

    Figure 6: Shows the baking powder

    Salt

    Salt is a dietary mineral essential for animal life, composed

    primarily of sodium chloride. Salt for human consumption

    is produced in different forms: unrefined salt (such as sea

    salt), refined salt (table salt), and iodised salt. It is a

    crystalline solid, white, pale pink or light grey in color,

    normally obtained from sea water or rock deposits. Edible

    rock salts may be slightly greyish in color due to this

    mineral content.

    Figure 7: Shows the salt

    Egg

    An egg is a round or oval body laid by the female of many

    animals, consisting of an ovum surrounded by layers of

    membranes and an outer casing, which acts to nourish and

    protect a developing embryo and its nutrient reserves.

    Figure 8: Shows the chicken egg

    Milk

    Milk is an opaque white liquid produced by the mammary

    glands of female mammals (including monotremes).

    60

  • 8/14/2019 CHAPTER 3 p74

    6/20

    Figure 9: Shows the milk

    Butter

    Butter is a dairy product made by churning fresh or

    fermented cream or milk.

    Figure 10: Shows the butter

    Muffin

    A muffin is somewhat like a small cake, and though it doesresemble a cupcake: they have cylindrical bases, rounded

    conical tops, and are usually not as sweet as cupcakes;

    savory varieties (such as cornbread muffins) also exist.

    They generally fit in the palm of an adult hand, and are

    intended to be consumed by an individual in a single

    sitting.

    Figure 11: Shows the muffin

    3.3 Utensils and Equipment

    Table 9: This table shows the utensils and equipment that are used in sweet potato muffin.

    Description Quantity Specification Source

    61

  • 8/14/2019 CHAPTER 3 p74

    7/20

    Knife

    Chopping board

    Utility tray

    Mixing bowl

    Dietetic scale

    Ladle

    Casserole

    Cookie sheet

    Strainer

    Peeler

    Oven thermometer

    Measuring cup (liquid)

    Measuring cup (solid)

    Measuring spoon

    2 pcs.

    2 pcs.

    2 pcs.

    1 set

    1 unit

    1 pc.

    1 pc.

    2 pcs.

    1 pc.

    2 pcs.

    1 unit

    1 set

    1 set

    1set

    Metal

    Metal

    Metal

    Metal

    Metal

    PFP storage room

    PFP storage room

    PFP storage room

    PFP storage room

    PFP storage room

    PFP storage room

    PFP storage room

    PFP storage room

    PFP storage room

    PFP storage room

    PFP storage room

    PFP storage room

    PFP storage room

    PFP storage room

    The raw materials used were of good quality fresh sweet potato of Ipomoea

    Batatas specie, of medium size and yellow color; cake flour, refined sugar, baking

    powder, salt, fresh egg, evaporated milk and butter. The utensils were borrowed from

    PUP Pilot Plant.

    Process Flow of Sweet Potato Muffin

    Selection of Raw Materials

    Preparation of Raw Materials

    62

  • 8/14/2019 CHAPTER 3 p74

    8/20

    Peeling

    Slicing

    Soaking

    Sun Drying

    Oven Drying

    Sorting

    Grinding

    Mixing

    Baking

    Cooling

    Packing

    Labeling

    StoringFigure 12: This figure shows the Process Flow of Sweet potato muffin

    3.4 Process in Making Sweet Potato Muffin

    3.4.1 Selection and Preparation of Raw Materials

    63

  • 8/14/2019 CHAPTER 3 p74

    9/20

    Quality assurance was employed in checking the quality of the raw sweet

    potato that will be used in making sweet potato noodles. It was test according to

    color, appearance and texture.

    Any soil on the roots must be removed before the root is peeled using a

    clean kitchen knife. Any damaged parts of the raw sweet potato should be

    trimmed off.

    3.4.2 Peeling

    The skin of sweet potato is peeled using a clean kitchen knife.

    3.4.3 Slicing / Chipping

    After washing, the sweet potatoes are dried in a clean place in the sun for

    about 10 minutes to remove the surface water. A manual or mechanical chipper /

    slicer is then used to cut the sweet potato into uniform pieces.

    3.4.4 Soaking

    Slices are soaked in clean tap water for 5-10 minutes. The volume of water

    used is twice the weight of the slices and is just enough to cover all the slices.

    3.4.5 Drying (Sun Drying and Oven Drying)

    64

  • 8/14/2019 CHAPTER 3 p74

    10/20

    The slices are then either sun dried on a raised tray for approximately 4-6

    hours if weather conditions are suitable, or in an oven dryer. The drying tray

    should be raised off the ground to prevent dust and dirt contaminating the chips. If

    drying rate will depend on the thickness of the slices, rate of turning chips as they

    dry and the amount of sliced chips place on the tray.

    3.4.6 Sorting and Grinding

    The dried sweet potato chips can now be milled into flour. The dried sweet

    potato chips can be sorted for uniformity before packaging or further processing,

    if this might affect the quality, intended use or price.

    3.4.7 Mixing

    In a large bowl, combine sweet potato flour, cake flour, sugar, baking

    powder, salt, egg, milk and butter based on different formulations.

    3.4.8 Baking

    65

  • 8/14/2019 CHAPTER 3 p74

    11/20

    Pre-heat the oven. Bake the muffin at 200C (400F) for 20-25 minutes.

    3.4.9 Cooling

    Turn onto wire racks to cool.

    3.4.10 Packing and Storage

    Sweet potato muffin can be safely packed and stored in polythene bags as

    well as baskets and tins.

    3.5 Methods of Evaluation

    The different finished products of muffin made from the sweet potato flour were

    evaluated. The formulations were different in percentage of the three (3) variables (Sweet

    potato flour, Fat and Cake Flour). Finished products were subjected to sensory

    evaluation.

    3.6 Subjective Evaluation

    The fifteen (15) experimental samples were coded with random numbers. All the

    product samples including the Control were presented to a panel of ten (10) students for

    sensory evaluation. Samples were labeled identically and were placed in identical paper

    plates and each panelist were asked to evaluate the experimental samples according to the

    paneling parameters namely; color, texture, taste / flavor, tenderness, odor / aroma, and

    firmness.

    66

  • 8/14/2019 CHAPTER 3 p74

    12/20

    Panelists were asked to strictly follow the instruction given in the score sheet. It

    was important that the panelist drank or gargled with water to remove any lingering taste

    or flavor brought about by the previous sample.

    67

  • 8/14/2019 CHAPTER 3 p74

    13/20

    Flow Chart

    Selection of Raw Materials

    Preparation of Raw Materials

    Peeling

    Slicing

    Soaking

    Sun Drying

    Oven Drying

    Sorting

    Grinding

    Subjective Evaluation Objective Evaluation

    Mixing

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

    Baking

    Cooling

    Subjective Evaluation Objective Evaluation

    Packing

    Labeling

    StoringFigure 13: This figure shows the flow chart of Sweet Potato Muffin

    68

  • 8/14/2019 CHAPTER 3 p74

    14/20

    3.7 Objective Evaluation

    The best produced finished product which is formulation 12 was subjected to

    microbial analysis wherein yeast and mold count were determined.

    3.7.1 Microbial Analysis

    3.7.1.1 Yeast and Mold Count

    One gram of sample was weighed and dissolved in 99 ml. distilled water in an

    Erlenmeyer flask, serial dilution was made by transferring one ml of diluted sample to a 9

    ml. of distilled water as 1:10. Further dilution were made as 1:1000, one ml. of each

    dilution was transferred into a petrifilm. Incubated for 24 hrs. at 25C in incubator. After

    incubation, number of colonies of at least 2 plates was counted, rounded up to 2

    significant figures. Then, was multiplied by the dilution of the water (Bryan, 1973).

    3.7.1.2 pH Count

    pH can be measured:

    by addition of a pH indicator into the solution under study. The indicator color

    varies depending on the pH of the solution. Using indicators, qualitative determin-

    ations can be made with universal indicators that have broad color variability over

    a wide pH range and quantitative determinations can be made using indicators

    that have strong color variability over a small pH range. Precise measurements

    can be made over a wide pH range using indicators that have multiple equilibri-

    ums in conjunction with spectrophotometric methods to determine the relative

    abundance of each pH-dependent component that make up the color of solution,

    or

    69

  • 8/14/2019 CHAPTER 3 p74

    15/20

    by using a pH meter together with pH-selective electrodes (pH glass electrode,

    hydrogen electrode, quinhydrone electrode, ion sensitive field effect transistor and

    others).

    by using pH paper, indicator paper that turns color corresponding to a pH on a

    color key. pH paper is usually small strips of paper (or a continuous tape that can

    be torn) that has been soaked in an indicator solution, and is used for approxima-

    tions.

    3.7.2 Proximate Analysis

    3.7.2.1 Ash

    Ash is the inorganic residue remaining after the water and organic matter have

    been removed by heating in the presence of oxidizing agents, which provides a measure

    of the total amount of minerals within a food. Analytical techniques for providing

    information about the total mineral content are based on the fact that the minerals can be

    distinguished from all the other components within a food in some measurable way. The

    most widely used methods are based on the fact that minerals are not destroyed by

    heating, and that they have a low volatility compared to other food components. The

    three main types of analytical procedure used to determine the ash content of foods are

    based on this principle: dry ashing, wet ashing and low temperature plasma dry ashing.

    The method chosen for a particular analysis depends on the reason for carrying out the

    analysis, the type of food analyzed and the equipment available. Ashing may also be used

    as the first step in preparing samples for analysis of specific minerals, by atomic

    spectroscopy or the various traditional methods described below. Ash contents of fresh

    foods rarely exceed 5%, although some processed foods can have ash contents as high as

    12%, e.g., dried beef.

    3.7.2.2 Moisture

    Weigh out 5 g of sample into a tared porcelain crucible or aluminum drying dish

    spreading the sample as thin as possible over the base of the dish. Put the dish and

    contents in an oven maintained at 105C and dry for 4 hrs. Remove cool in a dessicator

    70

  • 8/14/2019 CHAPTER 3 p74

    16/20

    and weigh.Return the dish to the oven and ready for a further 30 minutes. Remove, cool

    and weigh. Continue drying until a constant weigh has been reached. Calculate the

    moisture content from the weight loss of the sample.

    Calculation:

    % Moisture = Initial Weight Final Weight x 100

    Weight of Sample Used

    3.7.2.3 Crude Protein

    Laboratories measure the nitrogen (N) content of the forage and calculate crude

    protein using the formula: CP = % N x 6.25. Crude protein will include both true proteinand non-protein nitrogen. Cattle can use both types to some varying degree. Crude

    protein values give no indication if heat damage has occurred, which may alter protein

    availability.

    3.7.2.4 Crude Fat

    The traditional method for the analysis of fat was developed by German chemist

    Franz von Soxhlet in 1879. Essentially, the sample is suspended between a flask of

    boiling solvent and a condenser. The solvent evaporates, is condensed onto the sample,

    and thereby extracts the fatty matter en route back to the bulk solvent. Since freshly

    distilled solvent is continually contracting the sample, the solute's affinity for the solvent

    continues until the extraction is complete. By evaporating the excess solvent, the residual

    matter is quantified gravimetrically as fat. Soxhlet's procedure was significantly

    improved in 1974 by American chemist Edward Randall. The Randall technique

    immerses the sample in boiling solvent and then continuously elutes the sample with

    freshly condensed solvent.

    71

  • 8/14/2019 CHAPTER 3 p74

    17/20

    3.7.2.5 Total Carbohydrates

    By difference :

    This involves obtaining the variable carbohydrates content by calculation having

    estimated all the other fractions by proximate analysis as shown below:

    % Available Cabohydrates = 100 % - (% Moisture + % Ash + % Fat + % Protein

    + % Fibre)

    3.8 Cost Evaluation

    The cost of the product must be evaluated based on raw materials used in the

    preparation including utilities and packaging material, production cost and mark-up

    which is based on the weight of every formulation of each product.

    Table 10: This Table shows the cost analysis of sweet potato flour

    Unit Cost Quantity Actual Cost

    Sweet Potato 28.00 / kg 3 kg 84.00

    Overhead Cost

    Labor (minimum) 15.00 / hr 3 hrs 45.00

    Electricity 5.00 5.00Water 2.00 2.00

    Fuel 10.00 10.00

    Packaging 5.00 5.00

    Total Cost 67.00

    Unit Cost 151.00

    10% mark-up 15.10

    Selling Price 166.10 / kg

    72

  • 8/14/2019 CHAPTER 3 p74

    18/20

    Table 11: This table shows the cost analysis of sweet potato muffinS-45

    C-40

    F-15

    S-35

    C-40

    F-15

    S-45

    C-45

    F-20

    S-35

    C-45

    F-25

    S-45

    C-45

    F-25

    S-35

    C-40

    F-20

    S-40

    C-35

    F-25

    S-40

    C-45

    F-15

    S-40

    C-40

    F-20

    S-35

    C-35

    F-15

    S-35

    C-40

    F-25

    S-40

    C-35

    F-15

    S-40

    C-45

    F-25

    S-45

    C-40

    F-25

    S

    C

    F

    Unit

    Cost

    Quantity F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8 F9 F10 F11 F12 F13 F14 F

    weet Potato

    lour

    166.1 /

    kg

    7.5 5.8 7.5 5.8 7.5 5.8 6.6 6.6 6.6 5.8 5.8 6.6 6.6 7.5 6

    Cake Flour 38 / /kg 1.5 1.5 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.5 1.3 1.7 1.5

    ugar 35 / kg 50 g 1.75

    Bakingowder 16 / 100g 2 g 0.32

    alt 6 / kg 0.5 g 0.00

    3

    Egg (137.5 /

    c)

    35 / pc 55 g 1.4

    Milk 20/100

    ml

    100 ml 20

    Butter 35 / kg 0.53 0.53 0.7 0.88 0.88 0.7 0.88 0.53 0.7 0.53 0.88 0.53 0.88 0.88 0

    Total Cost ofngredients

    33.00

    31.3 33.37

    31.85

    33.55

    31.47

    32.25

    32.3 32.27

    31.1 31.65

    31.9 32.65

    33.35

    3

    Overhead Cost

    Labor

    minimum)

    15.00 /

    hr

    1 hr 15.0

    0Electricity 5.00 5.00

    Water 2.00 2.00

    uel 8.00 8.00

    ackaging 5.00 5.00

    Total Cost 35.0

    0

    35.0

    0

    35.0

    0

    35.0

    0

    35.0

    0

    35.0

    0

    35.0

    0

    35.0

    0

    35.0

    0

    35.0

    0

    35.0

    0

    35.0

    0

    35.0

    0

    35.0

    0

    3

    Unit Price 68.00

    66.3 68.37

    66.85

    68.55

    66.47

    67.25

    67.3 67.27

    66.1 66.65

    66.9 67.65

    68.35

    6

    0% mark-up 6.80 6.63 6.837

    6.685

    6.855

    6.647

    6.725

    6.73 6.727

    6.61 6.665

    6.69 6.765

    6.835

    6

    7

  • 8/14/2019 CHAPTER 3 p74

    19/20

    elling Priceer 12 pcs.

    74.8 72.93

    75.21

    73.54

    75.41

    73.12

    73.98

    74.03

    74 72.71

    73.32

    73.59

    74.42

    75.19

    7

    elling Priceer pc.

    6.23 6.08 6.27 6.13 6.28 6.09 6.17 6.17 6.17 6.06 6.11 6.13 6.2 6.27 6

    7

  • 8/14/2019 CHAPTER 3 p74

    20/20