Upload
lambert-stevenson
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Chapter 11: AggressionChapter 11: Aggression
What is Aggression?What is Aggression?Aggression- physical or verbal behavior intended to harm
someone Living vs. nonliving accident vs. intention actual damage vs. no damage self-defense duty or job responsibility instinctual behavior survival acts involving nonhumans covert acts inaction self-injury killing for sport
Handout 11.1
Measuring Human AggressionMeasuring Human Aggression
Buss Technique (similar to Milgram’s) Participants (“teacher”) told to shock a “learner” each
time they made an error on a simple learning task
Note: teachers chose how strong the shocks were Competitive Reaction Time task (Taylor et al.)
Participants compete with “opponent” on reaction-time trials. After losing a trial, they receive shock levels ranging in intensity from very mild to painful. After winning a trial, they pick shock level to administer to opponent
11.8Baron & Byrne- Social Psychology 9/e, Allyn and Bacon
Theoretical Approaches to Theoretical Approaches to Understanding AggressionUnderstanding Aggression
Biological Instinct theory - innate (unlearned) behavior pattern
Freud- redirecting the “death instinct” (thanatos) to others Lorenz- inherited “fighting instinct” developed through the course of
evolution (strongest survive)
Neural Influences Genetic Influences Blood Chemistry
high testosterone linked to higher aggression and less helping low levels of serotonin inhibit ability to restrain aggressive urges
Theoretical Approaches to Theoretical Approaches to Understanding AggressionUnderstanding Aggression
Psychological Drive theories- externally elicited drives arouses
motive to harm others Frustration-aggression theory
Social learning theories Instrumental learning Observational learning
Frustration-Aggression TheoryFrustration-Aggression Theory
Frustration(Goal)
Other additional responses(e.g., withdrawal)
Instigationto aggress
Outwardaggression
Inward aggression(e.g., suicide)
Indirect
Direct
Bandura, Ross, & RossBandura, Ross, & Ross
Subjects were exposed to either aggressive or nonaggressive models
Nonaggressive model assembled tinker toys
Aggressive model hit Bobo doll Subject then spent 20 mins
alone in room with various toys including Bobo. 0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
Physical Aggression
Female Male
Explaining School ShootingsExplaining School Shootings
Social Causes violent media easy access to weapons poor parenting social outcasts substance abuse male inability to
express emotion narcissistic
Biological Causes high testosterone low serotonin damaged prefrontal cortex damage to cingulate gyrus
How do these factors interact to create a disposition toward violent behavior?
FrustrationProvocationExposure to aggressive modelsCues associated with aggressionCauses of discomfort/negative affect
High irritabilityBeliefs about aggressionProaggression valuesType A behavior patternHostile attribution bias
ArousalAffective
StatesAggressiveCognitions
Aggression
Modern Theory of AggressionModern Theory of Aggression
Social DeterminantsSocial Determinants
frustration elicits aggression esp. when cause is unjustified
direct provocation (physical or verbal) exposure to media violence
primes aggressive thoughts; desensitizes viewers heightened arousal (provocation, exercise)
arousal in one situation can persist and intensify reactions in another, unrelated situation
11.9Baron & Byrne- Social Psychology 9/e, Allyn and Bacon
Chermack, Berman, & TaylorChermack, Berman, & Taylor
Subjects competed against “opponent” in reaction time game
After each trial, loser received a shock
2 conditions Low provocation - shocks stayed
at setting #2 High provocation - shocks
gradually increased from 2 to 9
3.83.4
3.94.6
4
7.2
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Shoc
k Se
ttin
g
Block 1 Block 2 Block 3
Low Provocation High Provocation
Excitation Transfer TheoryExcitation Transfer Theory
Aggressionis increased
Aggression is not increased
Arousal andirritation
attributed todelay at gate
Arousal andirritation are
attributedmainly to nearmiss in traffic
Frustration(delay at gate)
Near missin traffic
Heightenedarousal
Residualarousal
Personal DeterminantsPersonal Determinants Type A behavior pattern
Hostile attributional style
Narcissism (inflated self-esteem)
Gender (higher in males when not provoked) males tend to use direct forms (push, shove, insult) females tend to use indirect (gossip, spread rumors)
11.10Baron & Byrne- Social Psychology 9/e, Allyn and Bacon
Situational DeterminantsSituational Determinants
high temperatures hotter years (and
summers) increased rates of violent crimes, but not property or rape crimes
01234
56789
-5 15 35 55 75 95
Temperature
Inde
x of
Ass
ault
s
Situational DeterminantsSituational Determinants
alcohol intoxicated participants
behave more aggressively and respond to provocations more strongly
low aggressors became more aggressive when intoxicated, whereas high aggressors did not
3.2
4.2
4.94.4
0
1
2
3
4
5
Low Aggressors HighAggressors
Sober Intoxicated
Controlling AggressionControlling Aggression
Catharsis (“blowing off a little steam”) does not reduce aggression
Punishment must be prompt, strong, and justified
Exposure to nonaggressive models place prosocial models in violent situations
11.14Baron & Byrne- Social Psychology 9/e, Allyn and Bacon
Controlling Aggression (con’t)Controlling Aggression (con’t)
Cognitive interventions apologizing can be effective engage in activities that distract attention away
from causes of anger Teach social skills
better communication (e.g., saying no to requests) Induce incompatible responses
humor
11.15Baron & Byrne- Social Psychology 9/e, Allyn and Bacon