Chaopraya Water

  • Upload
    avi-das

  • View
    213

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Where is global warming going and its effect on water tables

Citation preview

  • 8/6/15Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16*

    Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16

  • 8/6/15Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16*

    Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16

  • 8/6/15Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16*

    Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16

  • 8/6/15Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16*

    Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16

  • 8/6/15Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16*

    Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16

  • Global warming.8/6/15Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16*

    Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16

  • GDP growth rates of China, India and Pakistan 2000-2010.8/6/15Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16*

    Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16

  • 8/6/15Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16*

    Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16

  • 8/6/15Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16*

    Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16

  • 1. India - 1,692,008,0002. China - 1,295,604,0003. United States - 403,101,0004. Nigeria - 389,615,0005. Indonesia - 293,456,0006. Pakistan - 274,875,0007. Brazil - 222,843,0008. Bangladesh - 194,353,0009. Philippines - 154,939,00010. Democratic Republic of the Congo - 148,523,000Top 10 in 20508/6/15Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16*

    Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16

  • 1) India - 1,550,899,0002) China - 941,042,0003) Nigeria - 729,885,0004) United States - 478,026,0005) Tanzania - 316,338,0006) Pakistan - 261,271,0007) Indonesia - 254,178,0008) DR of the Congo - 212,113,0009) Philippines - 177,803,00010) Brazil - 177,349,000Top 10 in 2100.8/6/15Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16*

    Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16

  • Population growth, urbanization, industrialization and increased reliance on irrigated agriculture have steadily increased regional demand for water.

    These trends are only expected to accelerate in coming decades. In addition, as climate change alters weather patterns and shrinks glaciers, the quantity of water in these river systems is expected to become increasingly erratic, leading to a higher frequency of severe floods and droughts.

    In the long-term, experts predict, the quantity of water in these river systems will decrease, especially in the Indus River system.

    The combination of these two trendsincreasing demand plus decreasing supply and access is likely to exacerbate disputes over regional water resources.The South Asia scenario.8/6/15Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16*

    Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16

  • 8/6/15Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16*

    Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16

  • With the largest rural population in the worldestimated at more than 1 billion in 2010 agriculture-dependent South Asia relies heavily upon water resources for agriculture.

    In India in 2000, for example, 86.4 percent of annual freshwater withdrawals were for agricultural use, while 8.1 percent were used domestically(UN, 2009).

    In South Asia, as elsewhere, water is not only important for drinking, but is essential to food and industrial production.Water dependent Agriculture8/6/15Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16*

    Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16

  • Agriculture constitutes 90 percent of all water use in South Asia, making it by far the most significant sector for water demand.

    Agriculture is also the most important economic activity and largest employer in the region.

    Approximately 68 percent of Indias workforce rely on farming, though agricultural contributions accounted for 19 percent of total gross domestic product in 2010.

    According to the World Bank (2008), agriculture accounts for one-quarter of Pakistans gross domestic product, two-thirds of its employment and 80 percent of its exports.The continued importance of Agriculture.8/6/15Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16*

    Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16

  • The developing world alone will be home to 90 percent of the 3 billion people expected to be added to the global population by 2025.

    The changes in lifestyle of those living in developing countries, where rising rates of economic development will increase demand for water as diets shift from primarily grain-based to include a greater diversity of meats and vegetables, is also an important factor.

    As the latest UNESCO World Water Assessment Report notes,the relevant question for contemporary water issues is often not How much water do people drink? but rather How much water do people eat? Eating more water!8/6/15Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16*

    Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16

  • Distribution of glacier area percentage.8/6/15Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16*

    Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16

  • Snow leopard range.8/6/15Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16*

    Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16

  • 8/6/15Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16*The Indus basin.

    Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16

  • Distribution of glaciers and areas.8/6/15Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16*

    Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16

  • The glacial waters of the Himalayas feed South Asias major river systems.

    The accelerating retreat of these glaciers as a direct result of global warming has already had troubling consequences for the region. These consequences are projected to worsen:

    Some climate change scenarios suggest these glaciers could shrink by as much as 80 percent by 2030.

    The glaciers retreat will increase supply in the short term, in many cases leading to flooding.

    Over the long run, however, diminished glaciers will be incapable of sustaining consistent supplies to the major rivers of the region Consequences of glacial melt.8/6/15Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16*

    Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16

  • Climate change is likely to limit the flow of the Indus River.

    Unlike the Ganges and Brahmaputra River systems, which rely more heavily on rainfall, the Indus River system is fed primarily by glacial meltwater.

    Meltwater provides approximately 70 to 80 percent of all the water in the Indus River. Global warming thus has a disproportionate impact on the amount of water entering the Indus and its tributaries.

    The precise effects of climate change on the Indus River system are highly dependent on how climate change is modeled.

    However, widely referenced estimates indicate a troublinglong-term trend for the flow of the Indus River.Immediate consequences for the Indus.8/6/15Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16*

    Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16

  • 8/6/15Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16*

    Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16

  • 8/6/15Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16*

    Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16

  • Water availability in Pakistan.8/6/15Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16*

    Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16

  • 8/6/15Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16*

    Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16

  • River water provides 80 percent of all irrigation water for Pakistans critical agriculture sector. These water sources are already near their limits, with most water diverted to northern Pakistans agricultural regions at the expense of the south. In fact, so much water is diverted from the Indus before it reaches the ocean that seawater has invaded the river channel miles inland.

    Based on current projections, the Indus River system is expected to fall below 2000 flow levels between 2030 and 2050. The drop-off is estimated to be most serious between 2030 and 2040, with a new equilibrium flow of 20 percent below that of 2000 reached after 2060.IPCC prognosis for Pakistan.8/6/15Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16*

    Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16

  • Demographic factors in Pakistan's problems.

    8/6/15Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16

    Pakistan has a population growth rate of 2.13 percent, compared to 1.27 percent in India and .61 percent in China. More people are a source of prosperity only to the extent that they are engaged in productive activity. Pakistan scores poorly in that regard.

    Pakistan's dependency ratio, as of 2010, was 69, compared to 56 for India and just 39 for China.

    Pakistan's total fertility rate remains high, and as long as it does so, its dependency ratio will remain high as well.*

    Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16

  • The Importance of Agriculture in India.8/6/15Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16Provides employment to 56.7% of the workforce of over 460 million. Work force growing by about 8 million a year now.Provides livelihood to 56% of populationAccounts for 18% of the GDP ($ 1.142 trillion in 2007 or $205 bn.). It was 42.8% in 1980 and supported almost 60% of the population.Indias population will stabilize around 2060 at 1.8 billion.To support a 8-9% GDP growth, Agriculture needs to grow at 4%.

    *

    Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16

  • 8/6/15Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16*Indias Irrigated and Rainfed Areas.

    Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16

  • % of Irrigated Acreage by Source.8/6/15Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16*

    Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16

    Sheet1

    CANALSTANKSWELLS

    GOVTPRIVATETUBE-OTHEROTHERNETtube and wells

    WELLSWELLSSOURCESIRRIGATED

    1980-811445084231829531816425513872017695

    1985-8615715465276511903851525024186520418

    1990-91169734802944142571043729324802324694

    1995-96165615593118178941180334675340229697

    1999-00175504452706209531267929055723833631.585

    CanalstanksTube-wells and wellsOther Sources

    GovtPrivateOTHER

    SOURCES

    Table: Proportion of area irrigated by source (%)

    YearsCanalsTanksTube-wells and wellsOther Sources

    GovtPrivate

    1980-8137.322.178.2245.706.591980-8114450842318295318164255138720

    1985-8637.541.116.6048.775.981985-86157154652765119038515250241865

    1990-9135.341.006.1351.426.111990-911697348029441425710437293248023

    1995-9631.011.055.8455.616.491995-961656155931181789411803346753402

    1999-0030.660.784.7358.765.081999-001755044527062095312679290557238

    Source: Ministry of Agriculture

    Sheet2

    Sheet3

  • Distribution of land-holdings and area owned. 8/6/15Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16*

    Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16

    Sheet1

    Table: Percentage distribution of households and area owned over landholding size

    Landholding sizeProportion of Household (%)Proprtion of Area owned (%)

    Marginal69.3816.93

    Small21.7533.97

    Semi- Medium5.0617.63

    Medium2.8417.64

    Large0.9513.83

    Source: 48 NSS round (1991-92)

    69.3816.93

    21.7533.97

    5.0617.63

    2.8417.64

    0.9513.83

    99.98100

    Sheet2

    Sheet3

  • 8/6/15Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16*The Sutlej moved westward and became a tributary of the Indus River while the Yamuna moved eastward and became a tributary of the Ganges, in the early 2nd millennium BCE. The Sutlej shifted its channel northwards repeatedly, and was eventually captured by the Indus system. The water loss due to these movements caused the Ghaggar-Hakra (Sarasvati) river to dry up in the Thar Desert and the Harappan settlements disappeared.

    Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16

  • 8/6/15Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16*Clearly global warning is inevitable and hence water problems in the sub-continent will get further exacerbated.We can only hope to mitigate effects by early and meaningful co-operation.We suffer from a knowledge deficit about the state of the glaciers and on changing monsoon patterns.We know even less about our groundwater resources. Aquifers have no borders.What can be done together?Finally!

    Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16

  • 8/6/15Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16*Thank you!

    Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16

  • 8/6/15Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16*

    Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16

  • Cheap water.8/6/15Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16*

    Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16

  • Climate change is the second major driver of pressure on water supply and access.

    As temperatures rise, glaciers that feed the worlds most important rivers are retreating at an accelerating rate.

    Rainfall patterns are becoming more extreme, with greater rainfall during the monsoon monthsleading to more frequent and severe floods in vulnerable lowlandsand less rainfall in the dry season, when it is needed mostThe impact of climate change.8/6/15Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16*

    Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16

  • Distribution of operational holdings in India.8/6/15Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16*

    Mohan Guruswamy Chaopraya 16

    Sheet1

    Distribution of Operational Holdings - Sizewise

    (1970-71, 1980-81 and 1990-91)

    Category of HoldingsNumber ( ' 000 )Area ( ' 000 Hectares)Average Size (Hectares)

    1970-711980-811990-911970-711980-811990-911970-711980-811990-91

    Marginal (Less Than 1 Hectares)3568250122633891454519735248940.410.390.39

    (50.6)(56.4)(59.4)(09.0)(12.0)(15.1)---

    Small (1.0 to 2.0 Hectares)1343216072200921928223169288271.441.441.43

    (19.1)(18.1)(18.8)(11.9)(14.1)(17.4)---

    Semi-Medium (2.0 to 4.0 Hectares)1068112455139232999934645383752.812.782.76

    (15.2)(14.0)(13.1)(18.4)(21.2)(23.2)---

    Medium (4.0 to 10.0 Hectares)7932806875804823448543447526.086.025.90

    (11.3)(09.1)(07.1)(29.8)(29.6)(27.0)---

    Large (10.0 and above )27662166165450064377052865918.1017.4117.33

    (03.9)(02.4)(01.6)(30.9)(23.0)(17.3)---

    Total70493888831066371621241637971655072.301.841.55

    (100.0)(100.0)(100.0)(100.0)(100.0)(100.0)

    Note: ( ) : Percentage share of various categories to the total (vertical) of a particular year

    Source : Fertiliser Statistics, 1999-2000, The Fertiliser Association of India

    CategoryNumber ( ' 000 )Area ( ' 000 Hectares)Average Size (Hectares)

    1970-711990-911970-711990-911970-711990-91

    Marginal (Less Than 1 Ha)356826338914545248940.410.39

    (50.6)(59.4)(09.0)(15.1)--

    Small (1.0 to 2.0 Ha)134322009219282288271.441.43

    (19.1)(18.8)(11.9)(17.4)--

    Semi-Medium (2.0 to 4.0 Ha)106811392329999383752.812.76

    (15.2)(13.1)(18.4)(23.2)--

    Medium (4.0 to 10.0 Ha)7932758048234447526.085.90

    (11.3)(07.1)(29.8)(27.0)--

    Large (10.0 ha and above )27661654500642865918.1017.33

    (03.9)(01.6)(30.9)(17.3)--

    Total704931066371621241655072.301.55

    (100.0)(100.0)(100.0)(100.0)

    ( ) : Percentage share of various categories to the total (vertical) of a particular year

    Source : Fertiliser Statistics, 1999-2000, The Fertiliser Association of India

    Sheet1

    50.6

    56.4

    59.4

    Year

    Share of marginal holdings in operational holdings (%)

    Sheet2

    19.1

    18.1

    18.8

    years

    Share of small holdings in operational landholdings (%)

    Sheet3

    15.2

    14

    13.1

    Years

    Share of small and medium holdings in operatinal landholdings (%)

    11.3

    9.1

    7.1

    Years

    Share of medium holdings in operatoinal landholdings (%)

    3.9

    2.4

    1.6

    Years

    Share of large holdings in operational landholdings (%)

    *****